Focus on Nature-based Solutions Toward Sustainability

Guest Editors

  • Xu Yue, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, China
  • Ge Sun, USDA Forest Service, USA
  • Mariska te Beest, Utrecht University, Netherlands
  • Jun Zhang, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Netherlands
  • Maricar Aguilos, North Carolina State University, USA
  • Xianglan Li, Beijing Normal University, China
  • Jintai Lin, Peking University, China

Eddy flux measurement at the Mt. Fuji site, credit by Jiquan Chen from Michigan State University

Scope

The nature-based solutions (NbS) aim to achieve co-benefits for human well-being and ecosystems through effective actions, including practices and policies, in the management of natural and modified ecosystems. The application of NbS causes impacts on the carbon, water, and energy cycles among the Earth systems. In turn, the efficiency of NbS is influenced by environmental perturbations resulting from the dynamic interplay of climate change, societal factors, and technology advancements. To acquire a comprehensive understanding of the benefits and tradeoffs associated with NbS, emerging efforts are required for the integration of various methodologies, including direct measurements, remotely sensed information, Earth System Models (ESM), up-to-date analyses such as meta-analyses, numerical simulations, artificial intelligence, and cross-disciplinary investigations.

This special issue for Environmental Research Letters (ERL) provides an interdisciplinary outlet to advance the understanding of the effective roles of NbS by exploring feedback mechanisms within Earth systems. While not exhaustive, the proposed topics for this collection include:

  • Responses of diverse ecosystems to the climate, environment, and societal changes.
  • The role of NbS in enhancing land carbon sink strength and improving water quality and quantity, and other ecosystem services.
  • State of art in integrating cross-site and long-term measurements and modeling of ecosystem fluxes.
  • Advances in big data fusion, modeling, and integration technology through ESM and machine learnings.
  • The economical and societal benefits of NbS in context of ecosystem functions and dynamics.
  • Mechanistic understanding of coupling human and nature systems through the lens of climate, environment, and ecosystem interactions.

Submission process

Focus issue research articles must be of the same format and meet the same publication criteria as regular research Letters in ERL. They are also subject to the same rigorous review process, high editorial standards and quality/novelty requirements. Read the about the journal page for more information before submitting.

For more comprehensive information on preparing your article for submission and the options for submitting your article, see our author guidelines.

Please submit your article via our online submission form. You should submit the appropriate article type for your submission then choose 'Focus on Nature-based Solutions Toward Sustainability' from the drop-down menu.

We encourage authors to include a cover letter, or separate justification statement (in the 'File Upload' step) outlining how your article meets the requirements of ERL, and why it is suitable for consideration in the journal, and focus issue (see the 'special requirements' section).

Deadline for submissions

The target deadline for submissions is 31 March 2024 though we can be flexible where necessary. We encourage early submission where possible, as articles will be published on acceptance without being delayed by other papers in the collection.

Publication charges

All articles published in ERL are completely free to read in perpetuity, and the journal is funded solely by article publication charges. The standard article publication charge can be found here.

Various discounts, waivers and funding arrangements are available to support our authors; visit our paying for open access page to find out whether you qualify.

Participating Journals

Journal
Impact Factor
Citescore
Metrics
Impact Factor 6.7
Citescore 10.1

Letter

Open access
Distinguishing the main climatic drivers to the variability of gross primary productivity at global FLUXNET sites

Hao Zhou et al 2023 Environ. Res. Lett. 18 124007

Climate exerts both short-term and long-term impacts on the ecosystem carbon assimilation. However, the main climatic drivers for the variability of gross primary productivity (GPP) remain unclear across various timescales and vegetation types. Here, we combine the state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms with a well-established explanatory method to explore the impacts of climatic factors on long-term GPP variability at global FLUXNET sites across four timescales and six plant functional types. Results show that diffuse shortwave radiation (SWdif) dominates GPP variability at the sub-daily (half-hourly to three hourly) timescales especially for the tree species, and acts as the secondary contributor after air temperature at the daily or longer timescales. Attribution analyses further showed that the main effects of SWdif are much higher than their interactive effects with other climatic factors in regulating the GPP variability. By identifying the main climatic drivers, this study improves the understanding of the climate-driven GPP variability and provides important implications for the future projection of ecosystem carbon assimilation under global climate change.

Open access
Solar radiation variation weakened the boost of gross primary production by vegetation restoration in China's most forestry engineering areas during 2001–2020

Yanlian Zhou et al 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 014082

Over the past decades, ecological restoration initiatives in China have made great progress in restoring degraded forests and increasing vegetation coverage, yet the carbon sequestration effects of these initiatives in the context of climate change are not clear. In this study, we assessed the effects of vegetation restoration on gross primary production (GPP) in China's forestry engineering areas, where large-scale vegetation restoration programmes were launched, during 2001–2020 by disentangling the respective roles of land cover change (LCC), CO2 fertilization, and climate changes using a two-leaf light use efficiency model. We found that LCC attributed by the vegetation restoration dominantly accelerated the increase of GPP in seven out of the eight areas, and CO2 fertilization played a near-equivalent role in all areas. By contrast, the changes in different climate factors contributed to GPP variations diversely. The solar radiation variation greatly inhibited the vegetation GPP over time in seven out of these areas, and the changes in air temperature and vapor pressure deficit regulated GPP inter-annual variations without clear trends in all areas. This study advances our understanding of the contribution of China's afforestation on its forest GPP in a changing climate, which may help to better manage forests to tackle the challenge of the climate crisis in the future.

Open access
Widespread reduction in gross primary productivity caused by the compound heat and drought in Yangtze River Basin in 2022

Tingyu Li et al 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 034048

Terrestrial ecosystems play a pivotal role in the global carbon sequestration process, and their photosynthetic capacity is highly susceptible to fluctuations in climate conditions. In 2022, the Yangtze River Basin (YRB) in China experienced an extensive and severe compounded heat and drought event. Compared with the past two decades, our results revealed that the temperature increased by approximately 0.78 ± 0.45 °C and precipitation decreased by about 45.20 ± 30.10 mm from July to October 2022 over the whole YRB. Region I (west from the Sichuan Basin and east to the easternmost of the basin) experienced a more severe temperature increase (0.98 ± 0.35 °C) and precipitation decrease (−60.27 ± 23.75 mm) compared to the other regions in the YRB. Changes in temperature and precipitation resulted in an increase of 0.14 ± 0.06 kPa in vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and a decrease of 5.28 ± 2.09 m3 m−3 in soil moisture, ultimately leading to a total loss of 26.12 ± 16.09 Tg C (about −6.08% compared to the 2001–2021 mean) in gross primary productivity (GPP) of July to October in 2022. It is noteworthy that broadleaf forests, which comprise 12.03% of the natural vegetation in region I, contributed only 6.46% of the GPP loss between July and October compared to other vegetation types, showing greater resistance to this climate event. Our findings from multiple linear regressions highlight that high temperatures and reduced soil moisture together contribute up to 94% photosynthesis loss in July–October in natural vegetation in region I, while the contribution of reduced VPD is minimal. In the future, we will further explore the impacts of compound heat and drought events on the coupled carbon and water cycles across different ecosystems, in order to better understand the ecosystem response mechanisms to extreme climates.

Open access
Climate policies for carbon neutrality should not rely on the uncertain increase of carbon stocks in existing forests

Caspar TJ Roebroek et al 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 044050

The international community, through treaties such as the Paris agreement, aims to limit climate change to well below 2 °C, which implies reaching carbon neutrality around the second half of the century. In the current calculations underpinning the various roadmaps toward carbon neutrality, a major component is a steady or even expanding terrestrial carbon sink, supported by an increase of global forest biomass. However, recent research has challenged this view. Here we developed a framework that assesses the potential global equilibrium of forest biomass under different climate change scenarios. Results show that under global warming carbon storage potential in forest aboveground biomass gradually shifts to higher latitudes and the intensity of the disturbance regimes increases significantly almost everywhere. CO2 fertilization stands out as the most uncertain process, with different methods of estimation leading to diverging results by almost 155 PgC of above ground biomass at equilibrium. Overall, assuming that the sum of human pressures (e.g. wood extraction) does not change over time, that total forest cover does not change significantly and that the trend in CO2 fertilisation as it is currently estimated from satellite proxy observations remains, results show that we have reached (or are very close to reaching) the peak of global forest carbon storage. In the short term, where increased disturbance regimes are assumed to act quicker than increased forest growth potential, global forests might instead act as a carbon source, that will require even more effort in decarbonization than previously estimated. Therefore, the potential of forests as a nature-based solution to mitigate climate change brings higher uncertainties and risks than previously thought.

Open access
Increased harvested carbon of cropland in China

Peiyang Ren et al 2024 Environ. Res. Lett. 19 054036

Crop harvested carbon (HC) is one of the most important components of the carbon cycle in cropland ecosystems, with a significant impact on the carbon budget of croplands. China is one of the most important crop producers, however, it is still unknown on the spatial and temporal variations of HC. This study collected statistical data on crop production at the province and county levels in China for all ten crop types from 1981 to 2020 and analyzed the magnitude and long-term trend of harvested crop carbon. Our results found a substantial increase of HC in cropland from 0.185 Gt C yr−1 in 1981 to 0.423 Gt C yr−1 in 2020 at a rate of 0.006 Gt C yr−1. The results also highlighted that the average annual carbon sink removal from crop harvesting in China from 1981 to 2020 was 0.32 Gt C yr−1, which was comparable to the net carbon sink of the entire terrestrial ecosystems in China. This study further generated a gridded dataset of HC from 2001 to 2019 in China by using jointly the statistical crop production and distribution maps of cropland. In addition, a model-data comparison was carried out using the dataset and results from seven state-of-the-art terrestrial ecosystem models, revealing substantial disparities in HC simulations in China compared to the dataset generated in the study. This study emphasized the increased importance of HC for estimating cropland carbon budget, and the produced dataset is expected to contribute to carbon budget estimation for cropland ecosystems and the entire China.