All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.
• Type of peer review: Single-blind
Single-anonymous: authors' identities are known to the reviewers, reviewers' identities are hidden from authors
Double-anonymous: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other
Triple-blind: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other, and from the Editor(s)
Open: author and reviewer identities are known to each other
• Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions?
• 1. Does the paper address relevant scientific questions within the scope of the conference?
• 2. Does the paper present novel concepts, ideas, tools, or data?
• 3. Are the results sufficient to support the interpretations and conclusions and substantial conclusions reached?
• 4. Is the overall presentation well structured and clear and the language fluent and precise?
• 5. Do the authors give proper credit to related work and clearly indicate their own new/original contribution?
Resubmission is allowed.
• Conference submission management system:
Easychair.org and ai-conf.org
• Number of submissions received:
32
• Number of submissions sent for review:
32
• Number of submissions accepted:
20
• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100):
62.5%
• Average number of reviews per paper:
2
• Total number of reviewers involved:
4
• Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system):
Plagiarism check was performed on all accepted papers.
• Contact person for queries:
Igor Balk Global Innovation Labs, USA (science [at] ai-conf.org)