Abstract
The creation of municipal solid waste produces serious ecological and community health problem throughout the world, particularly in emerging countries. Undeveloped scrapyards are the eldest and most communal method of solid waste disposal. If this is not properly managed, the migration of leachate from dump yards or landfills and the discharge of pollutants creates subsurface water pollution. Among different pollution measures, biofilm accumulation is the major choice. These studies indicate that biological barriers may be a promising technology to suppress pollutant plumes in the field. The present research focused on, the theory of biofilm aggregation in sand columns has been further to estimate the hydraulic conductivity of synthetic leachate and changes in organic pollutant concentration. Two different column research combinations were completed by using synthetic leachate as substrate solution. One column is used as a blank, and the other column is corrected with a mixed microbial culture separated from the leachate. The layered experimental mode using two different sizes of sand (0.3 mm and 0.6 mm) is used for column packing. The tower continuously supplies synthetic leachate for 50 days. Compared with the layered sand column, the hydraulic conductivity of the layered sand microbial column has the largest decrease, which is 88.42%. The analysis of organic pollutants in wastewater leachate also clearly shows that, compared with natural and synthetic liners used to control the migration of leachate in the underground environment, layered sand modified with microorganisms has appropriate remedial measures.
Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
This article (and all articles in the proceedings volume relating to the same conference) has been retracted by IOP Publishing following an extensive investigation in line with the COPE guidelines. This investigation has uncovered evidence of systematic manipulation of the publication process and considerable citation manipulation.
IOP Publishing respectfully requests that readers consider all work within this volume potentially unreliable, as the volume has not been through a credible peer review process.
IOP Publishing regrets that our usual quality checks did not identify these issues before publication, and have since put additional measures in place to try to prevent these issues from reoccurring. IOP Publishing wishes to credit anonymous whistleblowers and the Problematic Paper Screener [1] for bringing some of the above issues to our attention, prompting us to investigate further.
[1] Cabanac G, Labbé C and Magazinov A 2021 arXiv:2107.06751v1
Retraction published: 23 February 2022