Articles

THE WHITE DWARFS WITHIN 25 pc OF THE SUN: KINEMATICS AND SPECTROSCOPIC SUBTYPES

, , , , , and

Published 2014 May 1 © 2014. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Edward M. Sion et al 2014 AJ 147 129 DOI 10.1088/0004-6256/147/6/129

1538-3881/147/6/129

ABSTRACT

We present the fractional distribution of spectroscopic subtypes, range and distribution of surface temperatures, and kinematical properties of the white dwarfs (WDs) within 25 pc of the Sun. There is no convincing evidence of halo WDs in the total 25 pc sample of 224 WDs. There is also little to suggest the presence of genuine thick disk subcomponent members within 25 pc. It appears that the entire 25 pc sample likely belongs to the thin disk. We also find no significant kinematic differences with respect to spectroscopic subtypes. The total DA to non-DA ratio of the 25 pc sample is 1.8, a manifestation of deepening envelope convection, which transforms DA stars with sufficiently thin H surface layers into non-DAs. We compare this ratio with the results of other studies. We find that at least 11% of the WDs within 25 pc of the Sun (the DAZ and DZ stars) have photospheric metals that likely originate from accretion of circumstellar material (debris disks) around them. If this interpretation is correct, then it suggests the possibility that a similar percentage have planets, asteroid-like bodies, or debris disks orbiting them. Our volume-limited sample reveals a pileup of DC WDs at the well-known cutoff in DQ WDs at Teff ∼ 6000 K. Mindful of small number statistics, we speculate on its possible evolutionary significance. We find that the incidence of magnetic WDs in the 25 pc sample is at least 8% in our volume-limited sample, dominated by cool WDs. We derive approximate formation rates of DB and DQ degenerates and present a preliminary test of the evolutionary scenario that all cooling DB stars become DQ WDs via helium convective dredge-up with the diffusion tail of carbon extending upward from their cores.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. INTRODUCTION

Extending the census of local white dwarfs (WDs) to increasingly large volumes of space around the Sun offers a plethora of crucial astrophysical insights, including (1) identification of the lowest luminosity, hence oldest, WDs in the immediate neighborhood of the Sun; (2) the distribution of WD spectroscopic subgroups and their mix of progenitor stellar populations; (3) a direct measurement of the local space density and mass density of WDs; and (4) a window into the history of star formation and stellar evolution in the Galactic plane as well as the age constraint of the Galactic disk (Liebert et al. 1988; Oswalt et al. 1996) by enabling the determination of the cool WD luminosity function. The sample of WDs out to 20 pc was presented by Holberg et al. (2008b) and Sion et al. (2009), who utilized available temperatures, gravities, and spectral types from the literature to attempt a full characterization of the local sample of WDs. With the publication of new atmospheric parameters and more accurate distances for a larger sample of local WDs out to 25 pc, the statistical and kinematical properties of the volume-limited sample of local WDs merit re-examination.

The local 25 pc WD sample is a well characterized, volume-limited population with a high degree of completeness. It contains a sample of 224 WDs including double degenerate systems. While it has an overall completeness of 65%, the 20 pc and 13 pc samples have completenesses of 85% and 100%, respectively. As such, it lends itself to a number of analyses that can be used to anchor larger, less complete spectroscopic and photometric surveys that are not volume-limited. The results of the current 25 pc sample will be discussed in J. Holberg et al. (2014, in preparation), which will include an evaluation of the spatial distribution, the space density, and the completeness of the sample, as well as the mass distribution, local luminosity function, and binary fraction.

In this paper, we discuss the kinematics and the distribution of WD temperature and spectroscopic subtypes in the 25 pc sample around the Sun, and propose tests of scenarios of cool WD spectral evolution. We briefly describe the enhanced 25 pc sample in Section 2. The kinematic properties of this sample are discussed in Section 3. The DQ and DC components of the 25 pc sample and their temperature distributions are discussed in Section 4. The magnetic and cool DZ stars are discussed in Sections 5 and 6, respectively. In Section 7 we describe preliminary tests of cool WD spectral evolution using the volume-limited 25 pc sample. Section 8 contains our conclusions.

2. CENSUS OF WHITE DWARFS OUT TO 25 pc

Table 1 presents the sample of WDs within 25 pc of the Sun. The basic observational data with which we examined the distribution of WD spectral types and the data used for space motions are given in Table 1, which contains by column: (1) the WD number, (2) the coordinates (R.A. and decl. are in decimal degrees), (3) Teff, (4) DIST (distance in parsecs), (5) PM (proper motion in arcsec yr−1), (6) PA (position angle in degrees), (7) the method of distance determination, denoted by p for trigonometric parallax and s for spectrophotometric distances, and (8) a reference abbreviation to the bibliography. Many of the distances are obtained from trigonometric parallaxes, the remainder from spectrophotometric distances.

Table 1. Observational Data Used in Space Motions

WD Type Teff R.A. Decl. DIST PM PA Method Ref.
0000−345 DCP8.1 6643 000.667 −34.222 13.21 0.7578 169.046 p L20
0008+424 DA6.8 7380 002.843 +42.678 22.00 0.2328 191.648 sp L20
0009+501 DAH7.6 6502 003.061 +50.422 11.03 0.7150 219.920 p L20
0011−134 DAH8.4 5992 003.553 −13.183 19.49 0.8990 217.337 p L20
0011−721 DA7.8 6325 003.457 −71.831  ⋅⋅⋅ 0.3260 141.300 sp GBD
0029−031 DA11.3 4470 008.041 −02.900 23.47 0.6505 76.305 p pi
0038+555 DQ4.6 10900 010.337 +55.834 23.04 0.3396 103.627 p pi
0038−226 DQpec9.3 5529 010.358 −22.350 9.04 0.6047 232.600 p L20
0046+051 DZ7.4 6215 012.291 +05.388 04.31 2.9780 155.538 p L20
0053−117 DA7.1   13.959 −11.458  ⋅⋅⋅ 0.4396 350.045 sp G11
0108+048 DA6.4 8530 015.958 +05.075 21.32 0.3924 053.393 p G11
0108+277 DA9.6 6428 017.686 +27.970 13.8 0.2270 219.321 p L20
0115+159 DQ5.6 9119 019.500 +16.172 15.40 0.6480 181.805 p L20
0121−429 DAH7.9 6299 021.016 −42.677 18.31 0.5941 151.000 p L20
0123−262 DC6.9   021.351 −26.012  ⋅⋅⋅ 0.5945 154.8143 sp GBD
0123−460 DA8.5 5898 021.325 −45.752 24.90 0.7483 136.299 sp Sub08
0134+883 DA2.8 18311 025.369 +83.583 25.60 0.1500 306.870 sp G11
0135−052 DA6.9 7118 024.497 −04.995 12.34 0.6810 120.838 p L20
0141−675 DA7.8 6248 025.754 −67.308 09.72 1.0797 199.000 p L20
0145+360 DA7.8 6470 27.168 +36.258 24.2  ⋅⋅⋅  ⋅⋅⋅ sp Lim
0148+467 DA3.8 14005 028.012 +47.001 15.85 0.1240 0.569 p L20
0148+641 DA5.6 9016 027.963 +64.431 17 0.2854 123.857 sp DR7
0208+396 DAZ6.9 7264 032.836 +39.922 16.72 1.1450 115.746 p L20
0210−508 DQ+K1 6000 032.608 −50.823 10.91 2.1920 72.666 p SL
0213+396 DA5.4   034.068 39.857  ⋅⋅⋅ 0.1873 239.876 sp G11
0213+427 DA9.0 5507 034.281 +42.977 19.92 1.0470 125.065 p n L20
0227+050 DA2.7 18779 037.569 +05.264 24.30 0.0783 107.764 p G11
0230−144 DA9.2 5477 038.157 −14.197 15.62 0.6870 177.114 p L20
0231−054 DA3.7 13550 038.532 −05.194 22.7 0.2655 69.722 sp GBR11
0233−242 DC9.3 5312 038.840 −24.013 15.3 0.6220 189.015 sp L20
0236+259 DA9.2 5500 039.832 +26.165 21.00 0.3591 117.35 p Pi
0243−026 DAZ7.4 6839 041.628 −02.456 21.23 0.5342 155.21 p G11
0245+541 DAZ9.5 5319 042.151 +54.389 10.35 0.5735 227.827 p L20
0252+497 DA7.9 6370  ⋅⋅⋅  ⋅⋅⋅ 16.7  ⋅⋅⋅  ⋅⋅⋅ sp Lim
0255−705 DAZ4.7 10560 044.071 −70.369 21 0.6596 99.776 sp G11
0310−688 DA3.3 16865 047.628 −68.600 10.15 0.1112 158.097 p L20
0311−649 DA4.0 11945 048.107 −64.736 21.00 0.1661 101.107 sp Sub08
0322−019 DAZ9.9 5195 051.296 −01.820 16.80 0.9090 164.625 p L20
0326−273 DA5.4 8483 052.203 −27.317 17.36 0.8503 071.629 p L20
0340+198 DA7.0 7160 055.846 19.970 18.4 0.178 24.55 sp Lim
0341+182 DQ7.7 6568 056.145 +18.436 19.01 1.1990 159.771 p L20
0344+014 DC9.9 5170 056.778 +01.646  ⋅⋅⋅ 0.4730 150.400 sp L20
0357+081 DA9.2 5478 060.111 +08.235 17.82 0.5352 222.274 p L20
0413−077 DA3.1 17100 063.839 −07.656 05.04 4.0880 213.216 p L20
0416−594 DA3.3 14000 064.122 −59.302 18.23 0.1740 195.838 p SL
0419−487 DA8 6300 065.273 −48.652 20.12 0.5402 178.302 p G11
0423+044 DA 5140 066.658 +04.541 20.72 0.8469 131.936 p Pi
0423+120 DA8.2 6167 066.473 +12.196 17.36 0.2446 335.866 p L20
0426+588 DC7.1 7178 067.797 +58.977 05.53 2.4267 147.602 p L20
0431−279 DC9.5 5330 068.390 −27.890 24.7 0.388 90.738 p Sub08
0431−360 DA10.0 5153 068.232 −35.395 25.0 0.301 84.1 sp Sub08
0433+270 DA9.0 5629 069.187 +27.164 17.85 0.2760 124.196 p L20
0435−088 DQ8.0 6367 069.447 −08.819 09.50 1.5740 171.103 p L20
0454+620 DA4.3 11610 24.663 +62.152 24.9 0.188 149.6 sp Lim
0457−004 DA4.7 10800 074.930 −00.377 21.93 0.2926 142.778 sp L20
0503−174 DAH9.5 5300 076.498 −17.378 20.27 0.6876 14.4 p Pi
0511+079 DA7.7 6590 078.514 +08.004 20.26 0.3642 216.178 p G11
0532+414 DA6.8 7739 084.084 +41.498 23.81 0.1668 284.903 sp G11
0548−001 DQP8.3 6070 087.831 −00.172 11.07 0.2510 025.810 p L20
0552−041 DZ10.0 5182 088.789 −04.168 06.41 2.3760 166.600 p  
0553+053 DAP8.7 5785 089.106 +05.363 07.99 1.0272 204.993 p L20
0615−591 DB3.2 16714 094.063 −59.206 23.80 0.379 166 p Pi
0618+067 DA8.1 5940 095.198 +06.754 22.62 0.5352 91.392 p G11
0620−402 DZ6 5919 095.423 −40.217 21.50 0.379 166 p L20
0628−020 DA 6912 097.661 −02.097 21.50 0.2088 253.300 p G11
0642−166 DA2 25967 101.288 −16.713 02.63 1.3394 204.057 p L20
0644+025 DA6.8 22288 101.842 +02.519 18.45 0.4234 272.572 p L20
0644+375 DA2.4 22288 101.908 +37.515 15.40 0.9624 193.561 p L20
0649+639 DA8.1 6230 103.560 +63.932 21.1 0.200 225.0 sp Lim
0651−398A DA7.0 7222 103.397 −39.925 25.10 0.2125 341.906 sp Sub08
0655−390 DA7.9 6311 104.274 −39.159 17.2 0.3400 242.600 sp GBD
0657+320 DA10.1 4888 105.215 +31.962 18.69 0.6910 149.362 p L20
0659−063 DA7.7 6627 105.478 −06.463 12.34 0.8984 184.981 p L20
0706+377 DQ7.6 6590 107.559 +37.672 24.27 0.3577 220.010 p Pi
0708−670 DC9.9 5097 107.217 −67.108 17.5 0.2460 246.300 sp GBD
0727+482.1 DA10.0 4934 112.678 +48.199 11.11 1.2868 190.070 p L20
0727+482.2 DA10.1 4926 112.697 +48.173 11.11 1.2868 190.070 p L20
0728+642 DAP11.1 5135 113.378 +64.157 13.4 0.2660 171.352 sp L20
0736+053 DQZ6.5 7871 114.827 +05.227 03.50 1.2590 214.574 p L20
0738−172 DZA6.6 7650 115.086 −17.413 09.09 1.2634 116.600 p L20
0743−336 DC10.6 4462 116.410 −33.931 15.19 1.7360 352.670 p L20
0744+112 DA6.2 8160 116.875 11.126 25.7 0.1907 161.66 sp Lim
0747+073.1 DC10.4 4366 117.563 +07.193 18.28 1.8049 173.414 p L20
0747+073.2 DC12.0 4782 117.560 +07.196 18.28 1.8049 173.414 p L20
0749+426 DC11.7 4585 118.305 +42.500 17.8 0.420 165.845 sp L20
0751−252 DA9.8 5085 118.485 −25.400 17.68 0.3622 304.700 p L20
0752−676 DA8.8 5735 118.284 −67.792 07.89 2.1499 135.867 p L20
0753+417 DA7.3 6880 119.129 +41.664 24 0.3481 181.316 sp Kilic-10
0805+356 DA7.3 6900 122.296 +35.465 21.1 0.1051 220.873 sp Trem11
0806−661 DQ4.9 10205 121.723 −66.304 19.16 0.4468 130.400 p L20
0810+489 DC6.9 7300 123.546 +48.758 17.00 0.258 166.5 p GBD
0816−310 DZ7.6 6463 124.667 −31.172 23.80 0.8163 164.074 sp GBD
0821−669 DA9.8 5088 125.361 −67.055 10.65 0.7623 329.500 p L20
0827+328 DA6.9 7490 127.664 +32.696 22.27 0.5412 196.090 p L20
0839−327 DA5.5 9081 130.384 −32.942 08.81 1.7020 322.700 p G11
0840−136 DZ10.3 4874 130.701 −13.786 19.3 0.2720 263.000 sp L20
0843+358 DZ6 9041 131.685 +35.642 23.1 0.174 244.466 sp GBD
0856+331 DQ5.1 9920 134.811 +32.953 20.49 0.334 269.657 p Pi
0912+536 DCP7 7235 138.983 +53.423 10.30 1.5630 223.997 p L20
0946+534 DQ6.2 8100 147.571 +53.254 22.98 0.2642 259.753 p Pi
0955+247 DA5.8 8621 149.451 +24.548 24.44 0.4200 219.848 p L20
0959+149 DC7 7200 150.455 +14.689 22.2 0.339 269.493 p GJ
1008+290 DQpec11.0   152.923 28.766  ⋅⋅⋅ 0.7201 189.593 p Pi
1009−184 DZ8.5 6036 153.007 −18.725 18.30 0.5114 269.000 p L20
1012+083.1 DA7.5 6750 153.760 +08.109 25.80 0.3339 300.405 sp G11
1019+637 DA7.2 6742 155.787 +63.461 16.33 0.3790 053.160 p L20
1033+714 DC10.3 4727 159.260 +71.183 15.15 1.9170 256.008 p L20
1036−204 DQpecP10.2 4694 159.731 −20.682 14.28 0.6100 334.000 p L20
1043−188 DQ8.1 5780 161.412 −19.114 12.15 1.9780 251.636 p L20
1055−072 DA6.8 7491 164.396 −07.523 13.42 0.8270 276.328 p L20
1105−048 DA3.5 15141 166.999 −05.157 24.2 0.4445 188.148 sp G11
1116−470 DC8.6 5801 169.613 −47.365 17.9 0.3220 275.100 sp GBD
1121+216 DA6.7 7434 171.054 +21.359 13.42 1.0400 269.240 p L20
1124+595 DA4.8 10747 171.718 +59.321 25 0.1569 108.204 sp L20
1132−325 DC   173.623 −32.832 09.53 0.9400 038.955 p L20
1134+300 DA2.4 22469 174.271 +29.799 15.31 0.1480 267.948 p L20
1142−645 DQ6.4 7966 176.458 −64.841 04.62 2.6876 097.500 p L20
1148+687 DA7.6  ⋅⋅⋅ 177.718 +68.521 16.8  ⋅⋅⋅  ⋅⋅⋅ sp DR7
1149−272 DQ8.1 6200 177.900 −27.539 24.40 0.229 283.126 sp Sub08
1202−232 DAZ5.8 8767 181.361 −23.553 10.82 0.2458 16.600 p L20
1208+576 DAZ8.6 6200 182.872 +57.404 20.44 0.5486 132.414 p G11
1214+032 DA8.0 6272 184.216 +02.968 19.72 0.6947 291.357 sp Pi
1223−659 DA6.6 7594 186.625 −66.205 16.25 0.1858 186.900 p G11
1236−495 DA4.3 11599 189.708 −49.800 16.39 0.4902 255.709 p L20
1241−798 DC/DQ 9556 191.219 −80.157 22.10 0.5524 309.858 sp Sub08
1242−105 DA6.3   191.219 −10.852  ⋅⋅⋅ 0.3488 257.079 sp GBD
1257+037 DA9.0 5616 195.037 +03.478 16.58 0.9696 206.195 p L20
1309+853 DAP9 5440 197.171 +85.041 16.47 0.3213 140.811 p L20
1310+583 DA4.8 10544 198.241 +58.086 21.1 0.1995 112.708 sp G11
1310−472 DC11.9 4158 198.248 −47.468 15.03 2.2047 105.253 p L20
1315−781 DC8.8 5619 199.856 −78.391 19.17 0.4700 139.5 p Pi
1327−083 DA3.6 14571 202.556 −08.574 16.86 1.2049 246.761 p L20
1334+039 DA11 4971 204.132 +03.679 08.23 3.8800 252.775 p L20
1344+106 DAH7.1 7059 206.851 +10.360 20.04 0.9032 260.569 p L20
1337+705 DAZ2.5 20464 204.710 +70.285 24.79 0.405 266.035 p G11
1338+052 DC11.6   205.340 5.012  ⋅⋅⋅ 0.438 271.6 sp Say
1339−340 DA9.5 5361 206.508 +57.009 21.20 0.2758 315.881 sp GBD
1344+572 DA3.8 13389 206.510 +57.008 20 0.273 315.9 sp G11
1345+238 DA11 4581 207.012 +23.579 12.06 1.4960 274.637 p L20
1350−090 DAP5 9518 208.314 −09.275 22.73 0.3618 174.226 sp G11
1401+457 DC19 2600 210.853 +45.558 24.00 0.2840 251.947 sp Kilic10
1425−811 DAV4.2 12098 218.282 −80.157 22.72 0.5524 201.418 p G11
1436−781 DA8.1 6270 220.714 −78.398 24.65 0.4096 275.1 p Pi
1444−174 DC10.2 4982 221.855 −17.704 14.49 1.1440 252.643 p L20
1532+129 DZ6.7 7500 233.774 +12.795 22 0.2464 222.039 sp Koe11
1538+333 DA5.6 8940 235.139 +33.147 22.72 0.186 296.152 p Pi
1542−275 DB4.0   237.658 27.656  ⋅⋅⋅ 0.246 235.9 sp Ber11
1544−377 DA4.8 10610 236.875 −37.918 15.24 0.4685 242.838 p L20
1609+135 DA5.4 9041 242.856 +13.371 18.34 0.5510 178.513 p L20
1620−391 DA2.1 25985 245.890 −39.229 12.86 0.0755 89.962 p L20
1625+093 DA7.3 7038 246.972 +09.204 23.36 0.4872 192.325 p G11
1626+368 DZA6.0 8507 247.104 +36.771 15.94 0.8881 326.668 p L20
1630+089 DA9.0 5640 177.717 +68.521 13.2 0.4  ⋅⋅⋅ sp Lim
1632+177 DAZ5.0 10225 248.674 +17.609  ⋅⋅⋅ 0.0885 108.435 sp L20
1633+433 DAZ7.7 6608 248.755 +43.293 15.10 0.3730 144.151 p L20
1633+572 DQ8.2 5958 248.589 +57.169 14.45 1.6440 317.229 p L20
1639+537 DAH6.7 7510 250.238 +53.685 21.09 0.2369 212.416 p Pi
1647+591 DAV4.1 12738 252.106 +59.056 10.95 0.3236 154.498 p L20
1655+215 DAB5.4 9179 254.291 +21.446 23.25 0.5820 178.040 p L20
1658+440 DAP1.7 30510 254.951 +44.017 22.00 0.1012 341.869 sp G11
1705+030 DZ7.7 6584 257.033 +02.960 17.54 0.3790 180.907 p L20
1748+708 DQ9.0 5570 267.033 +70.876 06.07 1.6810 311.394 p L20
1756+143 DA9.0 5466 269.595 +14.293 22.40 1.0054 235.045 sp GBD
1756+827 DA6.9 7214 267.458 +82.773 15.64 3.5897 336.542 p L20
1814+134 DA9.5 5251 274.277 +13.473 14.22 1.2070 201.500 p L20
1817−598 DA5.8 4960 275.497 −59.863 24.87 0.3653 194.911 p Pi
1820+609 DA10.5 4919 275.332 +61.018 12.78 0.7133 168.517 p L20
1829+547 DQP8.0 6345 277.584 +54.790 14.97 0.3991 317.234 p L20
1840+042 DA5.8 9090 280.857 +04.339 24.87 0.187 296.935 p G11
1900+705 DAP4.2 11835 285.042 +70.664 12.98 0.5064 10.467 p L20
1911+536 DA2.9 17670 288.202 +53.720 22.1 0.018 225.0 sp Lim
1912+143 DA7.3 6940 288.650 +14.473 19.4 0.161 225.0 sp Lim
1917+386 DC7.9 6459 289.744 +38.722 11.69 0.2510 174.028 p L20
1917−077 DBQZ4.9 10396 290.145 −07.666 10.08 0.1740 200.602 p L20
1919+145 DA3.3 15280 290.418 +14.678 19.80 0.0743 203.806 p L20
1935+276 DA4.2 12130 294.307 +27.721 17.95 0.4361 088.686 p L20
1953−011 DC6.4 7920 299.121 −01.042 11.38 0.8270 212.314 p L20
2002−110 DA10.5 4800 301.395 −10.948 17.33 1.0740 095.523 p L20
2007−303 DA3.5 14454 302.736 −30.218 17.09 0.4280 233.492 p L20
2008−600 DC9.9 5080 303.132 −59.947 16.55 1.4276 166.100 p L20
2008−799 DA8.5 5800 304.207 −79.764 24.96 0.4339 127.979 p Pi
2011+065 DQ7 6400 303.481 +06.712 22.37 0.6297 203.39 p Pi
2032+248 DA2.4 19983 308.591 +25.063 14.65 0.6920 215.554 p L20
2039−202 DA2.5 19207 310.644 −20.076 21.10 0.3672 104.831 p G11
2039−682 DA3.1 15855 311.089 −68.089 22.00 0.3269 144.462 sp G11
2040−392 DA4.5 10830 310.955 −39.055 22.63 0.306 179 p G11
2047+372 DA3.6 14070 312.277 +37.470 17.28 0.2190 047.150 p L20
2048+263 DA9.7 5200 312.586 +26.511 20.08 0.5149 235.044 p L20
2048−250 DA6.6 7630 312.749 −24.867 22 0.2776 129.885 sp GBD
2054−050 DC10.9 4620 314.199 −04.844 17.05 0.8020 106.562 p L20
2058+342 DB4.1   315.089 34.439  ⋅⋅⋅ 0.168 42.6 sp Ber11
2105−820 DA4.7 10620 318.320 −81.820 17.06 0.5164 146.372 p L20
2111+072 DA7.8 6470 317.370 +07.451 24.1 0.341 70.289 sp Lim
2115−560 DA6 9736 319.902 −55.837 22.00 0.4652 115.463 sp G11
2117+539 DA3.6 13990 319.734 +54.211 19.72 0.2130 336.371 p L20
2118−388 DC9.6 5244 320.523 −38.643 22.00 0.1786 112.009 sp Sub08
2119+040 DA9.0   320.551 4.232  ⋅⋅⋅ 0.3897 28.341 sp Say
2126+734 DA3.8 16,104 321.740 73.645 21.23 0.2915 171.119 p G11
2133−135 DA5.0 9736 324.068 −13.309 20.40 0.2935 118.486 sp Sub08
2138−332 DZ7 7240 325.489 −33.008 15.62 0.2100 228.500 p L20
2140+207 DQ6.1 8200 325.670 +20.999 12.51 0.6819 199.445 p L20
2149+021 DA2.8 17353 328.105 +02.388 24.50 0.3003 177.328 p G11
2151−015 DA6 8400 328.526 −01.285 19.60 0.2851 178.191 sp G11
2154−512 DQ8.3 6100 329.421 −51.006 16.12 0.3746 184.738 p L20
2159−754 DA5.6 9040 331.086 −75.223 15.62 0.2042 238.300 p L20
2210+565 DA3.0 16790 332.973 +56.829 18.1 0.147 217.0 sp Say
2211−392 DA8.1 6920 333.638 −38.983 18.69 1.068 109.6 p Say
2211−392 DA8.1 6920 333.644 −38.985 18.79 1.0560 110.100 p Say
2215+386 DC10.6 4700 334.448 +37.130 25.12 0.4691 78.69 p Pi
2226−754 DC11.9 4230 337.665 −75.232 12.8 1.8680 167.500 sp L20
2226−755 DC12.1 4177 337.638 −75.255 14.0 1.8680 167.500 sp L20
2246+223 DA4.7 10647 342.273 +22.608 19.04 0.5253 83.551 p L20
2248+293 DA9 5580 342.845 +29.662 20.92 1.2575 83.745 p G11
2251−070 DZ12.6 4000 343.472 −06.781 08.51 2.5718 105.600 p L20
2253+054 DA9 5600 343.982 +05.755 24.46 0.4471 127.101 p Pi
2311−068 DQ6.8 7440 348.604 −06.546 25.1 0.3815 244.039 p Pi
2322+137 DA10.7 4700 351.332 +14.060 22.27 0.37 71.565 p L20
2326+049 DAV4.3 12206 352.198 +05.248 13.62 0.4934 236.406 p G11
2336−079 DA4.6 10938 354.711 −07.688 15.94 0.0500 140.000 p L20
2341+322 DA4.0 13128 355.961 +32.546 17.60 0.2290 252.150 p L20
2347+292 DA9 5810 357.479 +29.567 22.39 0.5065 185.666 p Pi
2351−335 DA5.7 8850 358.504 −33.275 23.35 0.5081 219.4 p G11
2359−434 DA5.9 8648 000.544 −43.165 08.16 0.8878 138.400 p L20

Notes. s, spectrophotometric; p, trigonometric parallax; a, weighted mean average. References. G11: Gianninas et al. (2011); Lim: Limoges et al. (2013); Say: Sayres et al. (2012); Pi: Trig. Parallax; DR7: J. Holberg et al. (2014, in preparation); Sub08: Subasavage et al. (2008); GBR11: Gianninas et al. (2011); Sub07: Subasavage et al. (2007); Ber11: Bergeron et al. (2011); GJ: Gliese & Jarheise (1995); Kilic10: Kilic et al. (2010); Koe11: Koester et al. (2011); Trem11: Tremblay et al. (2011).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2 3 4

A substantial fraction of the data in Table 1 was taken from the detailed survey of the local WDs out to 20 pc by Holberg et al. (2008b) and Sion et al. (2009). To this sample of 129 WDs, we have added 95 WDs out to a volume of 25 pc radius, giving a total sample of 224 WDs including double degenerates known out to 25 pc. As in Holberg et al. (2008b) and Sion et al. (2009), the photometric distances were computed based on spectroscopic and photometric measurements following the methods described in Holberg et al. (2008a). Proper Motions are taken from the McCook and Sion Catalog, or where available, were determined from NOMAD. Radial velocities were available from the literature for approximately 50% of our sample, and correspond either to direct measurements of the WD, or the system velocities or radial velocities of the main sequence companions (McCook & Sion 1999 and references therein; Maxted et al. 2000; Silvestri et al. 2001, 2002; Pauli et al. 2003, 2006). For radial velocities derived from individual WDs, we applied corrections for the gravitational redshift based on the individual masses and radii of each star. These mass and radius determinations were interpolated from within the synthetic photometric tables described in Holberg & Bergeron (2006) and were based on temperatures and gravities given in Holberg et al. (2008b, hereafter, LS08). Using the spectral types and temperatures given in LS08 and Holberg (2008), we assembled the local population of WDs lying within 25 pc of the Sun using a number of compilations, including Gliese & Jarheise (1995), LS08, Sion et al. (2009), Sayres et al. (2012), Bergeron et al. (2011), Giammichele et al. (2012), Dufour et al. (2007), Limoges et al. (2013), Subasavage et al. (2007, 2008), Gianninas et al. (2011), Kilic et al. (2010), Koester et al. (2011), and Tremblay et al. (2011).

We summarize the percentage breakdown of spectral subtypes among the 25 pc sample of local WDs in Table 2. As expected, the DA stars dominate the sample. If we take the total DA sample to include DAZ stars and magnetic DA stars, then there are 150 DA stars within 25 pc.

Table 2. Distribution of WD Spectral Subtypes within 25 pc

Spectral Type Range of Teff Number of Stars % of Total
DA 4590–25193 125 54%
DAZ 5093–20464 11 5%
DAH/DAP 4500–30510 14 6%
Magnetic Non-DA   5  
DB 16714 2 0.8%
DBQZ 10200 1 0.4%
DC 2600–7300 28 12%
DCP 6010 3 1.3%
DQ 5590–10900 23 8%
DQP 4948–6070 3 0.9%
DQZ 7740 1 0.4%
DZ 4000–7500 13 5%
DZA 7600–8440 2 0.9%

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

In Figure 1 we display a histogram with the number versus Teff distribution function of DA stars in the lower panel and non-DA stars in the upper panel. The skewing of their distribution toward lower temperatures not only reflects the predominance of cool DAs and cool non-DAs in a sample so close to the Sun, but the variation of this ratio, DA/non-DA, as a function of Teff, also holds key physical significance to our understanding of WD spectral evolution.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Histogram of the number vs. surface temperature distribution function for all DA white dwarfs (lower panel) and all non-DA white dwarfs (upper panel) within 25 pc of the Sun.

Standard image High-resolution image

The overall DA to non-DA ratio of the 25 pc sample is 1.83. This is a slightly larger ratio than found in the 20 pc sample and is likely a lower limit since a few of the cool non-DAs (especially DC stars) may actually prove to be H-dominated. Sion (1984) uncovered the first empirical evidence of this transformation of WD surface compositions and attributed the lowering of the DA/non-DA ratio with decreasing Teff to the mixing and dilution of hydrogen into the deepening helium convection zone (Sion 1984; see also Greenstein 1986). Sion (1984) estimated that this convective mixing away of surface hydrogen in cooling DA stars occurs at Teff ∼ 10–12,000 K. Subsequent more detailed work with evolutionary models (Tremblay & Bergeron 2008; Bergeron et al. 2001), using a larger, more homogenous sample of WDs, presented a more complex picture of spectral evolution at temperatures below 15,000 K. They showed that as a DA WD cools, the bottom of the hydrogen convection zone eventually reaches the helium convection zone but only if the hydrogen layer is thin enough, with the actual temperature at which the conversion occurs depending on the thickness of the hydrogen layer. In other words, DA WDs with thicker hydrogen layers will mix at lower Teff. They showed that the H layer mass that would mix at a given temperature depends on the assumed convective efficiency, with ∼85% of all DA stars between 10,000 K and 15,000 K having hydrogen layer masses large enough for them to remain recognized as DA stars down to 8000 K. It is clear from the results of Tremblay & Bergeron (2008) that the details of WD spectral evolution remain murky below 12,000 K. This can only be clarified with further theoretical modeling predictions confronted by ever larger samples of cool WDs with high quality spectra.

3. KINEMATICS OF THE LOCAL WHITE DWARFS

The vector components of the space motions are U, V, and W, where U is positive in the direction of the galactic anti-center, V is positive in the direction of the galactic rotation, and W is positive in the direction of the north Galactic pole (Wooley et al. 1970). The U, V, and W components and total motions were computed along with the average velocities and velocity dispersions for the different spectroscopic subtypes in the 25 pc sample in Table 1. In Table 3, we present the computed vector components of the space motion for each WD in Table 1. We note that for some of the WDs in Table 1, there are two sets of space motions from slightly different input parameters, such as proper motion and position angles. For these objects, two different sets of U, V, W, T values were computed and used to compute the averages and dispersions tabulated in Table 4. These mean velocities and velocity dispersions reveal no clear evidence that different spectral subtypes have significantly different space motions.

Table 3. Space Motions of White Dwarfs within 25 pc

WD No. Type U V W T
0000−345 DCP9 −11.9 −43.7 3.2 45.4
0008+424 DA6.8 −10.0 −1.9 −17.4 20.2
0009+501 DAH7.7 −28.1 8.6 −24.1 38.0
0011−134 DCH8.4 −75.5 −31.1 −9.8 82.3
0011−721 DA8.0 10.3 −23.2 12.2 28.2
0029−031 DA11.3 68.3 −23.0 2.6 72.1
0038+555 DQ4.6 39.4 −2.0 −11.9 41.2
0038−226 DQ9.3 −24.9 −4.6 −1.2 25.3
0046+051 DZ8.1 −2.8 −53.6 −30.3 61.6
0108+048 DA6.4 38.2 −0.1 11.8 40.0
0108+277 DAZ9.6 −11.9 0.3 −9.9 15.5
0115+159 DQ6 −21.4 −27.2 −32.0 47.2
0121−429 DAH7.9 −0.7 −46.8 11.1 48.1
0123−460 DA8.5 24.3 −91.0 24.9 97.4
0134+883 DA2.8 −11.1 5.1 6.1 13.7
0135−052 DA6.9 16.8 −37.2 −1.6 40.9
0141−675 DA7.8 −21.8 −22.8 21.5 38.2
0148+467 DA3.8 2.6 1.8 8.3 8.8
0148+641 DA5.6 12.3 −11.2 −6.8 18.0
0208+396 DAZ7.0 43.0 −62.9 −6.7 76.5
0210−510 DA10 85.6 −42.1 24.0 98.4
0213+427 DA9.4 37.8 −67.3 −19.8 79.8
0227+050 DA2.7 −0.1 −8.9 7.1 11.4
0230−144 DC9.5 −20.7 −43.3 −13.3 49.9
0231−054 DA3.7 68.5 −6.7 −56.4 89.0
0233−242 DC9.3 −24.2 −34.1 −9.8 43.0
0236+259 DA9.2 29.1 −21.1 −8.9 37.0
0243−026 DAZ7.4 8.9 −51.6 −34.5 62.7
0245+541 DAZ9.7 −16.4 10.9 −24.2 31.3
0255−705 DAZ4.7 22.2 −82.0 −0.6 84.9
0310−688 DA3.1 0.1 −4.2 2.8 5.1
0311−649 DA4.0 7.9 −12.8 9.5 17.8
0322−019 DAZ9.7 −21.5 −66.8 −20.7 73.2
0326−273 DA5.4 46.7 −29.7 47.2 72.8
0341+182 DQ7.7 −16.0 −94.9 −23.8 99.1
0344+014 DQ9.9 −7.9 −43.8 −4.9 44.8
0357+081 DC9.2 −25.3 −4.3 −36.8 44.9
0413−077 DAP3.1 −44.2 −34.8 −73.0 92.2
0419−487 DA8 −1.2 −91.1 −57.4 107.7
0416−594 DA3.8 −4.9 −5.7 −1.6 7.7
0423+044 DA9 −6.9 −80.5 17.2 82.6
0423+120 DA8.2 5.3 18.1 3.8 19.3
0426+588 DC7.1 0.9 −35.4 −3.7 35.6
0431−360 DA10.0 10.8 −19.6 27.0 35.1
0431−279 DC9.5 11.5 −28.8 33.3 45.5
0433+270 DA9.3 −0.1 −19.8 7.0 21.1
0435−088 DQ8.0 −25.1 −63.2 −21.6 71.4
0457−004 DA4.7 −6.1 −23.8 2.5 24.7
0503−174 DAH9.5 32.2 42.5 41.0 67.2
0511+079 DA7.7 −14.5 −9.2 −30.6 35.1
0532+414 DA6.8 1.2 12.4 −13.4 18.2
0548−001 DQP8.3 4.6 6.3 10.5 13.1
0552−041 DZ11.8 −25.3 −65.7 −20.2 73.3
0553+053 DAP8.9 −12.2 −19.8 −31.2 38.9
0628−020 DA −5.2 −7.7 −17.7 20.0
0615−591 DB3.2 −11.3 −0.1 7.1 13.3
0618+067 DA8.1 −9.0 −26.9 49.9 57.4
0620−402 DZ6 −13.9 −25.0 −7.2 29.5
0627+299 DA5 −0.80 −1.4 −0.6 1.7
0628−020 DA 61.0 −34.5 −27.2 75.2
0642−166 DA2 −0.6 −10.2 −14.5 17.7
0644+025 DA8 9.4 15.1 −30.9 35.7
0644+375 DA2.5 −19.7 −39.6 −32.7 55.1
0651−398A DA7.0 5.2 28.7 8.9 30.5
0655−390 DA8.0 2.7 2.3 −28.2 28.4
0657+320 DC10.1 −31.7 −52.9 13.2 63.1
0659−063 DA7.8 −19.7 −37.5 −29.5 51.6
0708−670 DC 4.7 4.9 −19.9 21.1
0706+377 DQ7.6 −7.2 −13.0 −31.6 34.9
0727+482.1 DA10.0 −14.6 −40.5 −14.7 45.5
0727+482.2 DA10.0 −14.9 −41.1 −14.9 46.3
0728+642 DAP11.2 −4.5 −9.2 3.9 11.0
0736+053 DQZ6.5 0.6 −12.0 −18.4 21.9
0738−172 DAZ6.7 −30.5 −29.2 30.2 51.9
0743−336 DC10.6 49.4 67.6 61.4 103.9
0747+073.1 DA12.1 −76.7 −126.3 −49.0 155.7
0747+073.2 DA11.9 −76.7 −126.3 −49.0 155.7
0749+426 DC11.7 −17.8 −29.6 5.6 35.0
0751−252 DA10.0 19.1 15.5 −13.8 28.3
0752−676 DC10.3 −29.3 −15.4 13.6 35.9
0753+417 DA7.3 −13.8 −28.6 −3.5 31.9
0806−661 DQ4.2 −17.2 −6.5 7.3 19.8
0805+356 DA7.3 0.5 −4.9 −6.6 8.3
0810+489 DC6.9 −9.0 −15.1 5.0 18.3
0810+489 DC6.9 −14.5 −22.8 8.6 28.3
0816−310 DZ7.6 −45.0 −52.7 −37.0 78.6
0821−669 DA9.8 16.8 4.5 4.4 18.0
0827+328 DA6.9 4.1 −45.4 −6.6 46.1
0839−327 DA5.3 38.2 26.6 4.6 46.8
0840−136 DZ10.3 14.0 −0.0 −21.0 25.2
0843+358 DZ6 7.6 −5.5 −13.6 16.5
0856+331 DQ5.1 21.4 0.883 −24.3 32.4
0912+536 DCP7 21.0 −42.5 −24.3 53.3
0946+534 DQ6.2 20.2 −7.3 −16.1 26.9
0955+247 DA5.8 6.1 −28.1 −17.7 33.8
0955+247 DA5.8 19.1 −40.3 −11.8 46.2
0959+149 DC7 −39.4 56.1 −127.2 144.5
1009−184 DZ7.8 36.1 −8.8 −26.4 45.6
1009−184 DZ8.5 35.1 −6.0 −26.8 44.5
1012+083.1 DA7.8 38.4 10.1 −12.2 41.5
1019+637 DA7.3 −14.7 17.9 3.5 23.4
1033+714 DC9 138.8 −73.2 −58.0 167.3
1036−204 DQP10.2 36.0 17.9 20.7 45.2
1043−188 DQ8.1 110.7 −71.1 −107.8 170.1
1055−072 DA6.8 42.3 −10.4 −16.3 46.5
1105−048 DA3.5 −17.3 −37.8 −29.8 51.2
1116−470 DC 24.3 −9.2 −7.0 27.0
1121+216 DA6.7 57.8 −25.3 −21.5 66.7
1124+595 DA4.8 −12.2 1.3 6.0 13.7
1132−325 DC −11.4 22.5 35.8 43.8
1134+300 DA2.5 9.2 −4.6 −2.9 10.7
1142−645 DQ6.4 −52.1 25.3 6.6 58.3
1149−272 DQ8.1 24.9 −8.5 −0.8 26.4
1202−232 DAZ5.8 3.0 6.1 8.6 11.0
1208+576 DAZ8.6 −45.5 −10.6 23.0 52.0
1214+032 DA8.0 64.0 −11.2 2.3 64.9
1223−659 DA6.5 0.7 0.1 −8.4 8.4
1236−495 DA4.4 24.0 −17.0 −8.6 30.7
1241−798 DC/DQ 38.1 −36.9 33.3 62.6
1242−105 DA6.3 13.8 −44.3 24.3 52.4
1257+037 DA8.7 −6.2 −69.4 −25.6 74.2
1309+853 DAP9 −16.3 −1.3 15.4 22.5
1310+583 DA4.8 −16.3 6.7 5.7 18.5
1310−472 DC11.9 −133.6 81.4 −51.5 164.8
1315−781 DA −23.5 +26.4 −32.3 47.8
1315−781 DC8.8 −30.2 34.0 −41.7 61.7
1327−083 DA3.7 49.2 −76.6 −7.4 91.3
1334+039 DZ10.0 87.5 −122.2 8.5 150.5
1337+705 DAZ2.8 43.7 −15.5 29.9 55.1
1339−340 DA9.5 55.0 108.0 177.4 214.8
1344+572 DA3.8 27.3 26.8 37.5 53.5
1344+106 DAZ7.1 54.6 −62.3 14.1 84.1
1345+238 DA10.7 67.0 −47.4 20.1 84.5
1350−090 DAP5 −21.7 −23.0 −23.2 39.2
1401+457 DC19 16.9 −27.6 5.5 32.9
1403+451 DB 3.9 −2.1 1.2 4.5
1425−811 DAV4.2 −7.9 −26.2 −44.0 51.779
1436−781 DA8.1 29.7 −32.5 23.3 49.8
1444−174 DC10.1 33.0 −61.4 17.6 71.9
1529+141 DA9.6 −10.6 −13.1 −7.2 18.3
1532+129 DA9.6 −1.8 −26.2 3.9 26.5
1538+333 DA5.6 12.0 −5.2 11.8 17.6
1544−377 DA4.7 5.5 −22.4 7.6 24.3
1609+135 DA5.8 −25.2 −35.3 −17.4 46.8
1620−391 DA2 −1.3 2.8 −3.2 4.5
1625+093 DA7.3 −23.9 −46.7 −12.3 53.9
1626+368 DZ5.5 35.1 15.5 35.6 52.3
1632+177 DA5 −2.7 2.3 −5.3 6.4
1633+433 DAZ7.7 −12.7 −4.2 −13.9 19.4
1633+572 DQ8.2 45.4 −3.0 54.5 71.0
1639+537 DAH6.7 −3.6 −19.1 8.9 21.4
1647+591 DAV4.2 −6.0 −3.0 −5.4 8.6
1655+215 DA5.4 −25.9 −35.9 −18.4 47.9
1655+215 DA5.4 −38.0 −39.0 −17.7 57.3
1658+440 DAP1.7 −6.6 33.0 28.2 43.9
1705+030 DZ7.1 −16.6 −23.1 −13.4 31.5
1729+371 DA7.3 −28.2 21.2 13.8 37.9
1748+708 DQP9.0 5.8 −10.8 34.2 36.3
1756+143 DA9.0 −36.3 −86.3 49.1 105.7
1756+827 DA7.1 8.8 −30.3 106.4 111.0
1814+134 DA9.5 −47.7 −72.0 −8.6 86.8
1817−598 DA5.8 −15.1 −22.9 2.3 27.6
1820+609 DA10.5 −9.8 −9.0 −19.7 23.7
1829+547 DQP7.5 2.8 −0.7 24.3 24.4
1840+042 DA5.8 32.0 −23.6 19.9 44.4
1900+705 DAP4.5 6.7 5.5 6.0 10.5
1917+386 DC7.9 −5.2 −5.7 −8.6 11.6
1917−077 DBQA5 −5.4 −6.4 −0.5 8.4
1919+145 DA3.5 −4.2 −5.0 −0.7 6.6
1935+276 DA4.5 16.0 10.2 −31.7 37.0
1953−011 DAP6.5 −32.3 −31.9 3.7 45.6
2002−110 DA10.5 40.4 9.8 −76.6 87.2
2007−303 DA3.3 −22.0 −18.3 18.0 33.8
2008−600 DC9.9 −17.7 −62.3 −3.3 64.9
2008−799 DA8.5 18.0 −6.5 −20.7 28.2
2011+065 DQ7 −64.2 −24.8 −17.0 70.9
2032+248 DA2.5 −36.9 −24.9 −2.8 44.7
2039−202 DA2.5 15.9 −3.9 −30.9 35.0
2040−392 DA4.5 −13.6 −25.2 −0.3 28.7
2039−682 DA3.1 0.698 −17.8 −9.9 20.4
2047+372 DA4 13.4 5.5 −1.4 14.6
2048+263 DA9.7 −37.6 −16.2 11.8 42.7
2048+263 DA9.7 −79.5 104.1 −13.4 131.7
2048−250 DA6.6 5.3 −13.6 −20.0 24.8
2054−050 DC10.9 31.1 −11.4 −54.1 63.5
2105−820 DAP4.9 12.5 −17.4 3.6 21.8
2117+539 DA3.5 −0.8 2.1 18.3 18.5
2115−560 DA6 17.5 −18.6 −31.4 40.5
2118−388 DC9.6 9.3 −6.3 −11.6 16.1
2126+734 DA3.8 3.2 11.8 −23.5 26.5
2133−135 DA5.0 11.7 −12.8 −20.3 26.7
2138−332 DZ7 −15.0 −8.3 8.4 19.1
2140+207 DQ6.1 −28.0 −18.9 −17.1 37.9
2149+021 DA2.8 −28.4 −3.2 −37.7 47.3
2151−015 DA6 −59.0 52.4 −85.8 116.6
2154−512 DQ7 −12.4 −22.4 9.9 27.5
2159−754 DA5 −27.6 7.6 18.5 34.1
2211−392 DA8 57.8 −43.7 −44.5 85.1
2207+142 DA6.6 21.1 83.8 −45.7 97.7
2209−147 DA6.6 54.9 −21.5 30.4 66.3
2211−392 DA8.1 46.6 −43.1 −61.1 88.2
2215+386 DC10.6 48.7 −7.1 −20.6 53.3
2226−754 DC9.9 −0.5 −88.5 71.5 113.8
2226−755 DC12.1 −0.5 −88.5 71.5 113.8
2246+223 DA4.7 42.4 −10.4 −16.9 46.8
2248+293 DA9 111.2 −29.8 −43.0 122.9
2251−070 DZ13 68.0 −48.2 −50.0 97.2
2253+054 DA9 20.3 −33.8 −34.2 52.2
2311−068 DQ6.8 −45.3 −1.7 7.4 45.9
2322+137 DA10.7 3.2 −0.5 −0.3 3.2
2326+049 DAZ4.4 −31.6 −2.1 −1.3 31.7
2336−079 DAZ4.6 −5.8 −13.4 −5.9 15.8
2341+322 DA4.0 −18.8 5.6 −0.4 19.6
2347+292 DA9 −18.3 2.7 −57.2 60.1
2351−335 DA5.7 −62.0 −22.5 −38.2 76.2
2359−434 DAP5.8 13.9 −16.4 −27.6 35.0

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2 3 4

Table 4. Kinematical Statistics of Spectroscopic Subgroups within 25 pc

Type Number U V W T
DA/DAZ 133 2.5 −18.4 −5.8 48.9
    33.9 33.8 28.6 33.0
DQ 15 −2.4 −16.0 −3.3 46.8
    38.7 26.8 25.2 22.2
DZ 14 2.0 −21.5 −14.0 47.0
    35.0 20.4 25.3 25.0
DC 26 −4.1 −27.0 −7.8 66.6
    46.7 49.8 41.3 50.8
DAP/DAH 11 3.3 −10.2 0.9 42.0
    30.6 30.7 26.3 27.5
Mag.non-DA 5 4.2 −19.5 −0.4 47.0
    25.4 28.5 16.9 25.0

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

If we take T  >  150 km s−1 as the lower cutoff for halo space motions, then there are seven stars or 3% of the total sample that have possible halo Population II stars in extreme galactic orbits that could happen to be interlopers in the solar neighborhood. These objects are WD0747+482.1 (DC10.4; 156 km s−1), WD0747+482.2 (DC12.0; 156 km s−1), WD0959+149 (DC7; 144 km s−1), WD1310−472 (DC11.9; 166 km s−1), WD1334+039 (DA11.0; 151 km s−1), WD1339−340 (DA9.5; 215 km s−1), and WD1756+827 (DA6.9; 156 km s−1).

To further investigate the question of population membership, we point out that the assignment of reliable population membership for local WDs must involve not only the vector components of the space motion but also the cooling ages derived from their surface temperatures and total stellar age. In contrast, the population membership of main sequence stars utilizes kinematical characteristics as well as chemical abundance data, e.g., metallicity. Despite this difference in the way population membership is assigned for the two types of stars, it is useful to compare the velocity distribution of the WD sample in the U versus V velocity plane with the velocity distribution (velocity ellipsoids) characterizing a well-studied sample of main sequence stars (Chiba & Beers 2000; Sion et al. 2009).

However, a halo or thick disk member star cannot be identified on the basis of kinematic data alone. The candidate star must also have a total stellar age that is of the order of 12 billion years or older. The temperature of the six stars given in Table 1 indicates cooling ages well below 12 billion years. Thus, their space motions together with their total stellar ages lead to the conclusion that there is no clear evidence of halo WDs among the WDs within 25 pc of the Sun.

In Figure 2, we display the U versus V space velocity diagram for the 25 pc sample of WDs, with the assumption of zero radial velocity, relative to velocity ellipses for main sequence stars (Chiba & Beers 2000; see also Kawka & Vennes 2006; Sion et al. 2009). DA stars are denoted by closed circles, while non-DA stars are denoted by closed triangles. In the diagram, the 2σ velocity ellipse contour (denoted by the solid line) of the thin disk component is displayed, as well as the 2σ ellipse of the thick disk component (short-dashed line) and the 1σ contour of the halo component (long-dashed line). The vast majority of WDs lie within the thin disk, as expected for the local sample. However, we see that nearly equal small numbers of DAs and non-DAs lie outside the thin disk ellipsoid but within the thick disk ellipse, while three stars, two DAs and one non-DA, lie clearly within the halo velocity ellipse. Finally, one non-DA and two DA stars have anomalous velocities, placing them at very large positive V velocity components.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. U vs. V space velocity diagram for the 25 pc sample of white dwarfs with the assumption of zero radial velocity. DA stars are denoted by closed circles, while non-DA stars are denoted by closed triangles. For comparison, three velocity ellipses for main sequence stars are shown following Chiba & Beers (2000): the 2σ velocity ellipse contour (solid line) of the thin disk component, the 2σ ellipse of the thick disk component (short-dashed line) and the 1σ contour of the halo component (long-dashed line).

Standard image High-resolution image

Given the concentric, nested nature of the thin and thick disk velocity ellipses in the U − V plane, it is difficult to clearly disentangle the two populations. Age is a strong discriminate, and careful consideration of this together with the use of individual galactic orbits (see Pauli et al. 2006 and others) may help to better separate these populations.

4. DQ STARS WITHIN 25 pc

In Figure 3, we display the distribution of Teff for the 23 DQ WDs (upper panel) and 28 DC WDs (lower panel) within 25 pc. Although any comparison with the non-DA subgroups suffers from small number statistics, the number of DQ stars appears to peak at lower temperatures, as expected since the C2 molecular absorption bands strengthen with decreasing Teff. Although the number of stars in both distributions is small, it is noteworthy that the DC stars extend to even lower temperatures than the DQ stars. The previously known precipitous cutoff in the number of DQ stars at surface temperatures cooler than ∼6500 is seen in Figure 3. This real cutoff was first noted by Bergeron et al. (2001) and subsequently found in the much larger Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) sample of DQ stars by Dufour et al. (2005) and by Koester & Knist (2006).

Figure 3.

Figure 3. Histogram of the number vs. surface temperature distribution function for all DQ white dwarfs (upper panel) and all DC white dwarfs (lower panel) within 25 pc of the Sun. Note the pileup of DC stars near the temperature at which the DQ stars show a real cutoff.

Standard image High-resolution image

Returning to the temperature distribution of 28 DC stars and 23 DQ stars, while mindful of small number statistics, it is nonetheless interesting that we see a large increase in the number of DC stars beginning at or near the temperature at which the DQ cutoff is seen. While some of these DC stars may show line features at high enough spectral resolution and sensitivity while other DCs may turn out to be hydrogen-dominated, we suggest the possibility that some of the 28 DCs within 25 pc could possibly be heretofore unidentified DQ stars with extreme pressure shifts that render their spectra unrecognizable. Alternatively, there may be some physical mechanism that removes carbon from the smallest optical depths in the atmosphere.

The peculiar DQ stars, the so-called C2H stars, appear at the low temperature end of the DQ distribution of Teff. Hall & Maxwell (2008) pointed out that the peculiar absorption features first identified as C2H in the spectra of cool (Teff < 6000 K) peculiar DQ stars were misidentified as hydrocarbon molecules, and instead are the extremely pressure-shifted Swan bands of C2. Kowalski (2010) showed that the distortion of Swan bands originates in the pressure-induced increase in the electronic transition energy between states involved in the transition. Unfortunately, the predicted Swan band shifts are too large compared to the observed ones. Thus, the need for further work in this area is indicated.

5. MAGNETIC WHITE DWARFS WITHIN 25 pc

The true incidence of magnetic WDs in a volume-limited survey remains an open question. Out to 25 pc, we count a total of 19 magnetic degenerates, among which there are 14 DA magnetics and 5 non-DA magnetics. Liebert et al. (2003) presented evidence that the true incidence of detected magnetism among field WDs at the level of ∼2 MG or greater, is at least 10%, and may be higher. The incidence of detected magnetism in our volume-limited sample is 8% but would be as high or higher than the Liebert et al. (2003) percentage if surveys of field strengths below 2 MG were carried out for our sample.

The relatively small number of magnetics within 25 pc prevents a determination of whether or not the field strength of a magnetic WD varies as a function of time (stellar age). For the same reason, we cannot say if the fraction of magnetic WDs is higher among cool star samples (e.g., samples of field WDs near the Sun) than among surveys of field WDs that extend out to greater volumes of space and hence sample hotter WDs. It remains an open question whether the number of magnetic WDs increases with decreasing Teff, luminosity, or cooling age. The answers to these questions must await volume-limited surveys sufficiently large in radius to encompass substantial numbers of hot WDs across a broader range of Teff.

6. COOL WHITE DWARFS WITH METALS

We count 26 cool WDs in the sample that exhibit absorption features due to accreted metals. This number excludes the DQ stars because although some may accrete metals, the carbon in their atmospheres is either primarily due to convective dredge-up (Dufour et al. 2005) or is primordial (Dufour et al. 2007). There has been no definitive explanation for why the DZ stars and DQ stars appear to have mutually exclusive spectra; almost no DQ stars reveal absorption features due to metals (other than carbon), while the DZ stars rarely exhibit absorption features due to carbon. It is unlikely that accreted metals may be easier to hide in DQ atmospheres due to increased opacity provided by carbon. We note that Weidemann & Koester (1989) analyzed a DZ star that contained carbon. More recently, Koester et al. (2011) reported a DQ star from the SDSS that reveals a decrease in flux at the blue end, which could be explained with calcium and possibly iron. It is also possible that the apparent dichotomy between DQ and DZ stars could be due to selection and small number statistics. Moreover, since the DQ stars require very deep convection zones to dredge up carbon, it is also possible that any accreted metals are diluted to such an extent that metal features are too weak to be detected.

Among these 26 WDs within 25 pc are 2 DZAs, 13 DAZs, and 11 DZ stars. For these objects, the most likely source of the accreted metals is from debris disks (Farihi et al. 2009 and references therein).

On this basis, we speculate that all 26 non-DAs with photospheric metals accreted from dust/debris disks of tidally disrupted asteroids, or in the case of DAZ stars, from volatile-rich matter such as comets. Thus, we speculate that at least 11% of the WDs within 25 pc have circumstellar debris disks with rocky, metallic debris and very likely descended from main sequence progenitors that had planetary systems. By comparison with frequencies of occurrence of exoplanets among Sun-like stars, Howard (2013) and Mayor et al. (2011) find that 15% of Sun-like stars host one or more planets with mass Msini = 3–30 Earth masses orbiting within 0.25 AU, and another 14% of Sun-like stars host planets with Msini = 1–3 Earth masses. The similarity between the frequency of occurrence of exoplanets and the fraction of WDs with metal lines within 25 pc is almost certainly just a coincidence since we do not know exactly how many of the WDs in the 25 pc sample have been observed with high resolution.

Among the 25 pc sample in Table 1, we have uncovered three WDs with IR excesses from WISE photometry that were previously unknown. This is suggestive of debris disks (Cox et al. 2014) associated with the three WDs.

7. PRELIMINARY TESTS OF COOL WHITE DWARF SPECTRAL EVOLUTION

The total space density of WDs within 25 pc remains unchanged from the 20 pc sample (Holberg et al. 2008b), while the completeness drops from 85% at 20 pc to ∼60% at 25 pc. The space density of WDs in Holberg et al. (2008b) is derived from the virtual completeness of the WDs within the core 13 pc sample. This can be determined in two ways: from a direct count of WDs within 13 pc, or by matching the slope of a log N – log (distance) plot to an expected slope of −3. The completeness estimates for the 20 pc and 25 pc samples are then simply computed with respect to the measured space density. Nevertheless, by considering the 20 pc sample, the nature of the incompleteness at 65% can be considered well characterized. We can use this knowledge to conduct a simple, preliminary, prospective test of WD spectral evolution to test the hypotheses that the ordinary DQ stars (i.e., excluding the class of hot DQs) are descendants of cooling DB stars (Koester et al. 1982; Wegner & Yackovich 1984).

The formation rate of DB stars can be estimated from the following expression:

where f is the ratio of DB degenerates (Kleinman et al. 2004) to all other WD types within the observed range of Mbol for DB stars, Nwd is the local space density of WDs in the same range of Mbol as the DB stars, and tDB is the time spent by DB stars cooling within their observed range of Mbol. Nwd is obtained from a cool WD luminosity function.

The temperature range of the DB WDs is 30, 000 K > Teff > 12, 000 K, corresponding to a luminosity range −1.01 > Log(L/L) > −2.52. For DB stars, the local space density within the interval 12, 000 K < Teff < 30, 000 K is

and the parameter f = 20% for DB stars (Kleinman et al. 2004). The 20 pc sample of Holberg et al. (2008) contained no spectroscopically identified DB stars. Bergeron et al. (2011) conducted a comprehensive analysis of 108 DB stars, including spectroscopic distance estimates, finding four DBs within 25 pc. One, WD2147+280, has a trigonometric parallax that yields a distance of 35.7 ± 0.4 pc, which, as the authors point out, is difficult to reconcile with the estimated distance unless the spectroscopic gravity is reduced to 8.2, in which case it becomes consistent with the larger distance. After calculating distance uncertainties from the results of Bergeron et al. (2011), we included three of these stars, WD1542−275, WD2058+392, and WD2316−173, in our new local sample including appropriate distance uncertainties. Overall, Bergeron et al. found a DB space density of 5.15 × 10−5 pc−3 that gives an expected number of approximately four DB WDs in the 25 pc sample, which compares favorably with the three DB stars included in our sample. If we assume an average DB mass, MDB = 0.6 M, then the cooling timescale for a DB from 30,000 K to 12,000 K tDB ≈ 3.95 × 108 yr, according to the cooling models of Bergeron et al. (2011 and references therein).4 Hence, the formation rate of DB stars, dNDB/dt, is

Likewise for the formation rate of DQ stars from the following expression:

where f is the ratio of DQ degenerates to all other WD types within the observed range of Mbol for DQ stars, Nwd is the local space density of WDs in the same range of Mbol as the DQ stars, and tDQ is the time spent by DQ stars cooling within their observed range of Mbol. Nwd is obtained from a cool WD luminosity function.

The temperature range of the DQ stars is 12, 000 K > Teff > 5500 K, corresponding to a luminosity range of −2.52 > Log L/L > −3.88. For the DQ stars, f = 9%. Assuming that DQ masses are Mwd = 0.6 M, the cooling time for a DQ through its interval of Mbol is tDQ = 3.6 × 109 yr. The local space density of DQs within the interval 12, 000 K > Teff > 5500 K is NDQ ≈ 2 × 10−3 DQs pc−3. Thus, the formation rate of DQ stars, dNDQ/dt, is dNDQ/dt = 4.5 × 10−14 pc−3 yr−1. The lower formation for the DQ stars relative to DBs presumably may reflect that not all cooling DB stars become DQ stars and may become DA stars either through accretion of volatile-rich tidally disrupted bodies, interstellar H, or diffusive float up of H as the DB cools. This very tentative result must be confirmed with larger, more complete samples of WDs.

Although this evolution test is only preliminary (given the uncertainties in the parameters used), it is nonetheless illustrative of the far-reaching potential of enlarging the volume of space around the Sun containing known WDs, thus increasing the sample size of WDs in each astrophysically important spectroscopic subclass including the magnetic degenerates as well as the DA, DB, DQ, DZ, and DC degenerates.

8. CONCLUSIONS

Our study has revealed the distribution of WD spectral types for 224 degenerate stars in a volume-limited sample out to 25 pc. We find the following characteristics of the sample.

  • 1.  
    There is little or no evidence of halo or thick disk component members within 25 pc, but seven degenerates with extraordinarily high space motions.
  • 2.  
    The sample includes a sizable number of DQ stars and cool (mostly DC and DZ) WDs. We note a possibly significant pileup of DC stars at the low temperature cutoff of the DQ stars.
  • 3.  
    The incidence of magnetic WDs within 25 pc is 8% of the total sample. This is close to the estimate of the true incidence of field WDs in the galactic disk by Liebert et al. (2003).
  • 4.  
    We carry out a preliminary test of one scenario of WD spectral evolution theory, namely, that all of the DQ stars (excluding the "hot" DQs) are the evolutionary descendants of the DB WDs. Within the uncertainties in the true space densities of DB stars and DQ stars, we find preliminary evidence that the formation rate of DQ stars is smaller than the DB rate, suggesting that not all DB stars evolve into DQ stars below 12,000 K.
  • 5.  
    We find no compelling evidence of any significant differences between the space motions of the various spectroscopic subtypes.

As this study indicates that the local WD population, with its high degree of completeness, provides an invaluable ground truth sampling of the WD population, particularly in the galactic disk. As such, it affords a number of ways to help characterize much larger, deeper, and more distant WD samples that are not volume limited, for example, those from the SDSS. Toward that end, compelling motivation now exists to both increase the completeness of the current 25 pc sample and extend it to a greater distance, thus providing a larger basic sample. Such efforts will also set the stage for a time during the next decade when the European Space Agency Gaia mission will make possible a virtually complete determination of all WD distances and proper motions (but not necessarily stellar spectra) out to ∼100 pc. Also within the same time frame, large surveys such as the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope will be sampling WD populations well into the halo.

This work is supported by NSF grant 1008845. We are grateful for several helpful comments and corrections from an anonymous referee. We thank John Debes for comments on the frequency of exoplanets around Sun-like stars. J.B.H. also wishes to acknowledge NASA Astrophysics Data Program grant NNX1OAD76. This research has made use of the White Dwarf Catalog maintained at Villanova University and the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France.

Footnotes

Please wait… references are loading.
10.1088/0004-6256/147/6/129