Brought to you by:

On the Secular Behavior of Irregular Satellites

and

© 2004. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A.
, , Citation Matija Ćuk and Joseph A. Burns 2004 AJ 128 2518 DOI 10.1086/424937

1538-3881/128/5/2518

Abstract

Although analytical studies on the secular motion of the irregular satellites have been published recently, these theories have not yet been satisfactorily reconciled with the results of direct numerical integrations. These discrepancies occur because in secular theories the disturbing function is generally averaged over the Sun's orbital motion, whereas instead one should take into account some periodic terms, most notably the so-called evection, which can be large for distant, slow-moving satellites. This problem is identical to that initially encountered by Newton and other historical researchers when studying the Moon's motion. Here we demonstrate that the evection and other terms from lunar theory can be incorporated into the more modern Kozai formalism and that our synthetic approach produces much better agreement with results from symplectic integrations. Using this method, we plot the locations of secular resonances in the orbital-element space inhabited by the irregular satellites. Our model is found to predict correctly those satellites that are resonant or near-resonant. We also analyze the octupole term in the disturbing function to determine the strengths of resonant locking for satellites whose longitudes of pericenter are librating. By independently integrating these satellites' nominal orbits using a symplectic integrator, we show that the strength of this resonance can be successfully obtained from simple analytical arguments. We note that the distribution of irregular satellite clusters in the space of proper orbital elements appears to be nonrandom. We find that the large majority of irregular-satellite groups cluster close to the secular resonances, with several objects (Pasiphae, Sinope, Siarnaq, formerly S/2000 S3, and Stephano, formerly S/1999 U2) having practically stationary pericenters. After proposing the name "main sequence" to describe this grouping, we point out that none of the largest satellites (those with radii R > 100 km) belong to this class. Finally, we argue that this dichotomy implies that the smaller near-resonant satellites might have been captured differently than the largest irregulars.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Please wait… references are loading.
10.1086/424937