The ITER cable-in-conduit conductors (CICCs) are built up from sub-cable bundles, wound in
different stages, which are twisted to counter coupling loss caused by time-changing
external magnet fields. The selection of the twist pitch lengths has major implications for
the performance of the cable in the case of strain-sensitive superconductors, i.e.
Nb3Sn, as the electromagnetic and thermal contraction loads are large but also for the
heat load from the AC coupling loss. At present, this is a great challenge for the
ITER central solenoid (CS) CICCs and the solution presented here could be a
breakthrough for not only the ITER CS but also for CICC applications in general.
After proposing longer twist pitches in 2006 and successful confirmation by short
sample tests later on, the ITER toroidal field (TF) conductor cable pattern was
improved accordingly. As the restrictions for coupling loss are more demanding
for the CS conductors than for the TF conductors, it was believed that longer
pitches would not be applicable for the conductors in the CS coils. In this paper we
explain how, with the use of the TEMLOP model and the newly developed models
JackPot-ACDC and CORD, the design of a CICC can be improved appreciably,
particularly for the CS conductor layout. For the first time a large improvement is
predicted not only providing very low sensitivity to electromagnetic load and thermal
axial cable stress variations but at the same time much lower AC coupling loss.
Reduction of the transverse load and warm-up–cool-down degradation can be reached by
applying longer twist pitches in a particular sequence for the sub-stages, offering a large
cable transverse stiffness, adequate axial flexibility and maximum allowed lateral strand
support. Analysis of short sample (TF conductor) data reveals that increasing the twist
pitch can lead to a gain of the effective axial compressive strain of more than 0.3% with
practically no degradation from bending. This is probably explained by the distinct
difference in mechanical response of the cable during axial contraction for short and long
pitches. For short pitches periodic bending in different directions with relatively short
wavelength is imposed because of a lack of sufficient lateral restraint of radial pressure.
This can lead to high bending strain and eventually buckling. Whereas for cables with
long twist pitches, the strands are only able to react as coherent bundles, being
tightly supported by the surrounding strands, providing sufficient lateral restraint
of radial pressure in combination with enough slippage to avoid single strand
bending along detrimental short wavelengths. Experimental evidence of good
performance was already provided with the test of the long pitch TFPRO2-OST2,
which is still until today, the best ITER-type cable to strand performance ever
without any cyclic load (electromagnetic and thermal contraction) degradation.
For reduction of the coupling loss, specific choices of the cabling twist sequence are needed
to minimize the area of linked strands and bundles that are coupled and form loops with
the applied changing magnetic field, instead of simply avoiding longer pitches. In addition
we recommend increasing the wrap coverage of the CS conductor from 50% to at least 70%.
A larger wrap coverage fraction enhances the overall strand bundle lateral restraint.
The long pitch design seems the best solution to optimize the ITER CS
conductor within the given restrictions of the present coil design envelope,
only allowing marginal changes. The models predict significant improvement
against strain sensitivity and substantial decrease of the AC coupling loss in
Nb3Sn
CICCs, but also for NbTi CICCs minimization of the coupling loss can obviously be
achieved. Although the success of long pitches to transverse load degradation was already
demonstrated, the prediction of the elegant innovative combination with low coupling loss
needs to be validated by a short sample test.