All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.
• Type of peer review: Single-blind
Single-anonymous: authors' identities are known to the reviewers, reviewers' identities are hidden from authors
Double-anonymous: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other
Triple-blind: author and reviewer identities are hidden to each other, and from the Editor(s)
Open: author and reviewer identities are known to each other
• Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions?
• scientific quality
• style and organization
• appropriate level of English
• good level of figures and tables
• adequate references and discussion to related work
There was the opportunity to resubmit an article after minor as well as major revisions.
• Conference submission management system:
Each article undergoes assessment by the given editor and then it is sent to 2 or 3 reviewers. According their reviews and recommendations the paper is sent back to the author for revisions. The final approvement of the paper is done by the editor.
• Number of submissions received: 30
• Number of submissions sent for review: 26
• Number of submissions accepted: 26
• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 26/30*100=86,67
• Average number of reviews per paper: 2,8
• Total number of reviewers involved: 58
• Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system):
Each article is checked by a plagiarism detection software (PlagScan).
• Contact person for queries:
Martin Nejedlík, Research Institute for Building Materials, e-mail: conference@vustah.cz