All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information:
• Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other
Double-blind peer review was arranged via the system by editors and reviewers.
• Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions?
Scope, organization, originality, grammar and as well as the significance of the papers would be considering when accepting/declining papers. It is ok to resubmit articles if minor or major revision is needed.
• Conference submission management system:
Bosen Academic Conference Submission System with URL as below:
http://www.academicconf.com/Identity/Account/Login?confName=ABS2021
• Number of submissions received: 230 submissions with 158 full papers
• Number of submissions sent for review: 50 papers
• Number of submissions accepted: 14 papers
• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 28%
• Average number of reviews per paper: 2
• Total number of reviewers involved: 35
• Any additional info on review process (ie plagiarism check system): iThenticate Plagiarism Testing System
• Contact person for queries:
Xuqiao Feng
feng_xq@hotmail.com
Bohai University; Institute for Science and Technology of Fruits and Vegetables, China
Please submit this form along with the rest of your files on the submission date written in your publishing agreement.
The information you provide will be published as part of your proceedings.