All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information:
• Type of peer review: Double-blind
• Conference submission management system: AI Scholar System
• Number of submissions received: 186
• Number of submissions sent for review: 176
• Number of submissions accepted: 99
• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 53.2%
• Average number of reviews per paper: 2
• Total number of reviewers involved: 50
• Any additional info on review process:
• Step 1. Each of selected paper will be reviewed by two/three professional experts in the related subject area.
• Step 2. Review Reports received from the experts will be judged by one of the editors either Review Reports are logical or not?
• Step 3. If not logical, then editor can assign new reviewer or can also judge at his/her own.
• Step 4. If logical, then Review Reports will be sent to authors to modify the manuscript accordingly.
• Step 5. Authors will be required to revise their papers according to the points raised.
• Step 6. Revised version will then be evaluated by the editor for the incorporation of the points raised by the reviewers.
• Step 7. Then the editor will send the revised manuscript to the reviewers again for re-evaluation.
• Step 8. If the reviewers approve the revise version of the manuscript, then will be accepted for publication.
• Contact person for queries:
Xuexia Ye
publication@keoaeic.org
AEIC Academic Exchange Information Centre