Chapter 2

The Sakharov conditions


Published Copyright © IOP Publishing Ltd 2022
Pages 2-1 to 2-2

Download ePub chapter

You need an eReader or compatible software to experience the benefits of the ePub3 file format.

Download complete PDF book, the ePub book or the Kindle book

Export citation and abstract

BibTeX RIS

Share this chapter

978-0-7503-3571-3

Abstract

Perhaps the most convincing motivation for requiring an explanation for the BAU is the fact that inflation, a cornerstone of modern cosmology, will wash out any initial BAU. Before inflation was proposed, however, Sakharov proposed that any explanation of the BAU must satisfy three conditions, now famously known as the 'Sakharov conditions'.

This article is available under the terms of the IOP-Standard Books License

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher, or as expressly permitted by law or under terms agreed with the appropriate rights organization. Multiple copying is permitted in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, the Copyright Clearance Centre and other reproduction rights organizations.

Permission to make use of IOP Publishing content other than as set out above may be sought at permissions@ioppublishing.org.

Graham White has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

Perhaps the most convincing motivation for requiring an explanation for the BAU is the fact that inflation, a cornerstone of modern cosmology, will wash out any initial BAU. Before inflation was proposed, however, Sakharov proposed that any explanation of the BAU must satisfy three conditions, now famously known as the 'Sakharov conditions'. These conditions are:

  • violation of baryon number conservation;
  • violation of C and CP;
  • departure from equilibrium.

The conditions are intuitively obvious as they basically say in crude terms that you need a process that allows you to create baryons, treat particles differently to anti-particles 1 and the future different to the past, and you need the process to change something in the Universe [1]. Even though the last condition is the most obvious it actually has a well-known loophole if CPT invariance is violated in a theory [2]. This can be seen from the proof of the third condition. Consider the equilibrium average of the baryon asymmetry B using standard thermal quantum mechanics 2 ,

Equation (2.1)

The proof is quite elementary but does reveal that in asserting that baryon asymmetry production requires a departure from equilibrium you are implicitly assuming CPT invariance. This, however is a safe assumption in the vast majority of models including any this author is aware of that use the electroweak baryogenesis mechanism. Despite these conditions being intuitively obvious they are useful for the organization of this book, which is structured around these conditions. Remarkably one can, in principle, satisfy all three conditions using Standard Model particle content. However, the precise values of parameters within the Standard Model rule out it being sufficient to explain the BAU.

References

Export references: BibTeX RIS

Footnotes

  • 1  

    A mild subtlety is that C or CP violation separately does not achieve this. One requires both C and CP violation as a necessary condition for the rate of total baryon production to be different to total anti-baryon number.

  • 2  

    An astute reader might note that this argument implies that the baryon asymmetry is zero when the Universe returns to equilibrium. Indeed, processes that violate baryon number conservation do conspire to return the baryon number to zero on a time scale much larger than the age of the Universe. The key point of the argument however is that the baryon number of the Universe should be zero without some departure from equilibrium (or a violation of CPT).