Brought to you by:

A Catalog of Galactic Multiple Systems with a Red Supergiant and a B Star

, , , and

Published January 2020 © 2020. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation M. Pantaleoni González et al 2020 Res. Notes AAS 4 12 DOI 10.3847/2515-5172/ab712b

2515-5172/4/1/12

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. Introduction

Binary stars are useful to study many aspects of stellar structure and evolution and the systems where the two objects have very different spectral types are especially so, as (barring interactions between them or with third objects) they signal coeval evolutionary phases. In this context, Neugent et al. (2019), from now on N19, indicate that "until a year ago (2018), the total number of known Galactic binary RSGs was 11" (RSG = red supergiant) and then go on to wonder about where the missing binaries are and to point toward 87 new RSG+B binary systems in M31, M33, the SMC, and the LMC. In this work we examine that quoted text.

2. Methods

We have searched the literature and Simbad to find Galactic RSG+B binary systems. More specifically, we define RSGs as objects with spectral type G, K, or M and luminosity classes II to Ia for consistency with N19, but we note that criterion includes some Cepheids, which can be of spectral type G-K0 in some phases. Results are listed in Table 1 along with some useful information. The separation column is populated if a visual component with Δm small enough to contribute to the spectral type at short wavelengths is listed in the Washington Double Star Catalog (Mason et al. 2001).

Table 1.  Objects, Spectral Classifications, Galactic Coordinates, V Magnitudes, Separations, References, and Comments, Sorted by l

Name Alternate Name RSG   B Star l b V Sep. References Comments
    ST LC Q.   ST LC Q. (deg.) (deg.)   ('')    
HD 161 387 V777 Sgr K5 Ib   B6: 2.43 1.27 7.5 P98  
HD 173 297 V350 Sgr F5/G2 Ib   B9 V 13.76 −7.96 7.5 S17 Cepheid
HD 168 701 V4390 Sgr K3 II   B3/5? 15.08 −1.04 7.7 G02  
FR Sct HIP 90 115 M2.5 Iab ep   B 18.47 0.34 11.6 S17  
β1 Cap Dabih Major G9 II:   B8 p:Si: 29.15 −26.37 3.1 0.1 G02 Visual and spectroscopic binary
HD 169 689 V2291 Oph G9 II   B9 V 37.21 9.36 5.7 G02  
η Aql 55 Aql F6-G2 Ib   B9.8 V 40.93 −13.08 3.8 0.7 E13 Cepheid
χ Aql 47 Aql G2 Ib   B5.5 49.34 −5.70 5.3 0.4 G02  
δ Sge 7 Sge M2.5 II-III   B9 V 55.77 −3.38 3.8 0.1 S17 Visual and spectroscopic binary
HD 187 321 BD +18 4252 G5 Ib-II:   B7 IV 56.21 −3.49 7.1 0.4 G02  
HD 190 361 BD +20 4406 K4 Ib   B4 IV-V 59.93 −5.41 7.3 G02  
HD 187 299 BD +24 3889 G8 Ib   B6/9 V 61.48 −0.31 7.3 S14  
HD 199 378 BD +14 4478 K1.5 II   B7: 61.83 −19.25 7.3 G02  
β Cyg A Albireo A K3 II   B9 V 62.11 4.57 3.1 0.3 B18 Red star has low mass?
HD 186 518 PS Vul K3 II   B6 62.82 1.61 6.4 0.3 G02 Visual and eclipsing binary
22 Vul HD 192 713 G4 Ib   B7/9? 63.47 −6.36 5.2 G02 In Neugent et al. (2019)
BD +27 3542 Tyc 2148-00114-1 K3 Iab   B3 II 64.02 0.18 8.7 N20  
HD 186 688 SU Cyg F2-G0 I-II   B7 V 64.76 2.51 6.4 S17 Cepheid
HD 186 097 BD +30 3692 G1: Ib-II   B8 III 65.65 3.90 7.3 0.8 G02  
HD 196 753 BD +23 4085 K1 II   B7 66.65 −10.61 5.9 G02  
V2028 Cyg ALS 10 651 K2 Ib/II   B4 III [e] 67.63 1.26 10.9 Z01  
V2417 Cyg AS 381 K: I:   B1 [e] 70.58 0.57 14.4 M02  
47 Cyg HD 196 093 K6: Ib   B2.5: 75.43 −2.93 4.6 0.3 G02 Visual and spectroscopic binary
HD 193 469 BD +38 4003 K4.5 Ib   B8 V 76.76 1.68 6.3 3.5 G02  
o1 Cyg 31 Cyg K4 Iab   B4 IV-V 82.68 6.78 3.8 S17 In Neugent et al. (2019)
o2 Cyg 32 Cyg K5 Iab   B4 IV-V 83.67 7.05 4.0 S17 In Neugent et al. (2019)
V1068 Cyg BD +41 4100 G8 II-III   B9 86.69 −5.28 10.3 S17  
HD 205 114 BD +51 3079 G2 Ib   B7/8 IV: 95.22 0.86 6.2 G02  
HD 203 338 V381 Cep M1 Ib ep   B2 ep 98.18 6.36 5.8 0.1 M69  
5 Lac HD 213 310 K6-M0 I   B7/8? IV: 99.66 −8.65 4.4 G02  
HDE 235 749 BD +54 2698 M2 Ib   B 101.47 −0.80 8.9 D18  
ALS 12 387 LS III +57 47 K3 Ib   B 104.52 0.75 10.7 6.3 D18 Gaia DR2 vis. comp. not in WDS
HD 208 816 VV Cep M2 Ia-Iab ep   B8: V e 104.92 7.05 4.9 S17 In Neugent et al. (2019)
δ Cep 27 Cep F5-G2 Ib   B7-8 105.19 0.53 3.8 E13 Prototype Cepheid
U Lac HD 215 924 M4 Iab ep   B 105.82 −3.55 9.4 S17  
HD 214 369 W Cep K0-M2 Ia ep   B0/B1 106.02 0.06 7.6 S17  
HD 218 393 BD +49 4045 G8 II   B3 pe 106.36 −9.29 6.9 P04  
HD 217 476 V509 Cas F8-K Ia-0 e   B1 V 108.16 −2.70 5.1 S17  
HD 213 503 BD +67 1443 K2 II:   B8 IV: 110.36 8.88 7.9 G02  
ψ And 20 And G5 Ib   B9/A0 IV: 111.34 −14.97 5.0 0.3 G02  
KN Cas BD +61 8 M1 Ib ep   B3 V 118.15 0.19 9.5 0.2 S17  
V641 Cas BD +63 3 M3 Iab e   B2.5 118.34 1.46 8.3 S17  
HDE 236 429 DL Cas F5-G2 Ib   B9 V 120.27 −2.55 8.6 S17 Cepheid
HD 3210 BD +48 177 K4 II-III   B2 120.30 −6.63 7.0 0.3 G02 Visual and spectroscopic binary
V554 Cas BD +61 219 M2 I   B e 125.11 −0.28 9.5 S17  
BD +59 224 Tyc 4030-00149-1 K4.5 Ib   B3 V 126.13 −2.33 9.5 G04 In Neugent et al. (2019)
HD 9352 BD +57 320 K3 Ib-II   B7/8: 128.44 −4.09 5.7 G02  
AZ Cas BD +60 310 M0 Ib e   B0-B1 V 128.97 −0.85 9.2 S17  
55 Cas HD 13 474 G0 II-III   B9 V 131.08 4.98 6.1 0.1 M69  
HD 12 401 XX Per M4 Ib   B 133.10 −6.22 8.2 S17 In Neugent et al. (2019)
γ And Almach K3 II   B9.5 V 136.96 −18.56 2.1 9.4 A95 Triple system (next line)
            A0 V       9.4 A95  
HDE 237 006 BD +57 641 M1 Ib e   B: 138.02 −1.37 9.3 H69  
HD 16 082 BD +51 599 K0 II   B6 138.94 −7.60 7.3 G02  
HD 17 306 BD +53 574 K3 Iab   B: 139.65 −4.85 7.9 B57  
HD 19 278 BD +56 779 K2 II   B7/8 140.97 −1.34 8.2 1.7 G02  
HD 23 089 BD +62 604 G2 Ib/II   B7 III/IV 141.10 6.81 4.8 G06  
HD 24 480 BD +60 768 K3 II   B8/9 143.54 5.90 5.1 1.7 G02  
HD 17 245 BD +43 576 G8 II-III   B8: 143.89 −13.82 6.5 G02  
HDE 237 190 RW Cam F5-G1 Ib   B8 III 144.85 3.80 8.7 0.3 S17 Cepheid
HD 21 771 BD +44 732 K3 II   B8 150.56 −9.23 7.3 G02  
HD 27 395 BD +49 1165 G9 II   B 153.60 0.12 7.2 2.0 C05 Visual and spectroscopic binary
μ Per 51 Per G0 Ib   B9.5 153.94 −1.82 4.2 G02  
f Per 52 Per G9 II:   B9.5/A0: IV: 159.45 −7.54 4.7 G02  
BD +43 1041 ALS 8026 G5/K0 II/III   B8: V 160.29 −1.48 8.7 S14  
58 Per HD 29 094 G7 Ib   B8/9.5: 161.76 −4.03 4.3 G02  
ζ Aur 8 Aur K5 Ib-II   B6.5 IV-V 165.02 −0.43 3.8 S17 In Neugent et al. (2019)
HD 36 947 BD +43 1315 G7 Ib:   B7 III: 166.22 6.54 7.3 0.1 G02  
HD 33 203 BD +37 1067 K4 II:   B2 II: 168.95 −1.49 6.1 1.6 P98  
36 Tau HD 25 555 K1 II   B7.5 IV: 169.67 −20.79 5.5 <0.1 G02 Visual and spectroscopic binary
HD 27 639 BD +20 744 K5: II   B7/8 175.26 −19.98 6.0 1.9 G02  
HDE 246 901 BD +33 1138 G5: Ib:   B1: 176.00 2.26 8.1 M55  
HD 42 474 WY Gem M2 Iab ep   B2-B3 V 187.91 2.26 7.4 S17  
HD 39 286 BD +19 1110 K0 IIb   B8 IV 188.57 −3.34 6.0 G00  
HD 47 086 BD +23 1433 G: I   B/A 190.31 7.72 6.7 0.1 B83  
HD 44 990 T Mon G8 Iab-Ib   B9.8 V 203.63 −2.56 6.0 E94 Cepheid
HD 39 118 BD +01 1148 K0 II   B7/8 204.02 −12.57 6.0 G02  
HD 45 910 AX Mon K1 II-III   B1 IV eq 205.33 −1.95 6.9 S17  
HD 50 820 BD −01 1446 K2 II   B3 IV e 214.87 −0.08 6.2 H82  
HD 52 690 V926 Mon M2 Ib   B7/9? IV: 217.49 0.66 6.6 G02  
V838 Mon Nova Mon 2002 M I   B3 V 217.80 1.05 var M07 In Neugent et al. (2019)
HD 55 684 BD −04 1862 K3 II   B7.5 III: 220.07 2.59 7.3 G02  
μ CMa 18 CMa K3 II   B8.5 225.99 −5.34 4.9 2.8 G02  
BD −12 1805 NGC 2345-34 K3: II   B 226.57 −2.29 9.9 M74  
HD 59 067 BD −11 1951 G4: Ib   B2 227.37 2.67 5.9 0.7 G02  
HD 60 415 KQ Pup M2 Iab ep   B2 V 230.67 2.52 5.0 S17  
F Hya HD 74 395 G1 Ib   B9.5/A0 233.29 20.97 4.6 G02  
π Pup HD 56 855 K3 Ib   B5 249.01 −11.28 2.7 S14  
V624 Pup CD −32 4694 M2 Iab   B1 V 249.58 −1.42 10.9 S17  
HD 31 244 CPD −51 600 K3 II-III   B5 259.03 −39.32 6.6 J60  
HD 81 137 WY Vel M3 Ib: ep   B 274.14 −1.82 8.8 S17  
NGC 3105-24 [AMN2018] 348 K3 Ib   B2 V: 279.91 0.28 13.0 A18  
HDE 300 933 CPD −56 3586 M2 Iab/Ib   B 285.42 1.45 8.3 H72  
HDE 303 344 CPD −57 3805 M2 Ib   B 287.08 1.09 9.3 D79  
HD 93 281 V730 Car M1 Iab   B 287.70 −0.86 7.8 S17  
HD 101 007 CPD −60 3178 M3 Ib   B 294.08 0.40 7.0 K89  
HD 101 947 V810 Cen F5-G0 Ia-0   B1 Iab 295.18 −0.64 5.0 S17  
HD 101 712 V772 Cen M2 Ib ep   B 295.24 −1.59 7.9 S17  
CD −61 3575 Tyc 8992-00314-1 M2 Ia ep   B 302.09 0.92 9.9 S14  
KN Cen HIP 66 383 G8 Iab   B6 V 307.76 −2.11 9.9 0.3 S17 Cepheid
HD 119 796 V766 Cen G8 Ia-0   B0 Ib p: 309.30 −0.41 6.8 0.1 S17 In Neugent et al. (2019)
26 Cir HD 130 702 F2-G2 II   B4 315.83 −4.01 6.0 0.3 S17 Cepheid
HD 134 270 CPD −54 6367 G2/5 Ib   B8 V 321.96 2.27 5.4 N85  
CPD −58 6053 ALS 3371 M2 Ia   B 322.79 −2.28 9.9 D79  
HD 146 323 S Nor F8/G0 Ib   B9.5 V 327.75 −5.40 6.5 E13 Cepheid
HD 135 345 CPD−41 7104 G5 Ia   B 329.98 13.66 5.2 0.2 J60  
HD 145 415 CPD −53 7442 K2 Ib   B 329.85 −2.18 8.9 A17  
α Sco Antares M0.5 Iab   B3 V: 351.95 15.06 0.9 3.2 C84  
HD 172 991 CPD −39 8163 K3 II   B7 356.00 −15.77 5.4 J60  

References. A95: Abt & Morrell (1995), A17: Alonso-Santiago et al. (2017), A18: Alonso-Santiago et al. (2018), B57: Bidelman (1957), B83: Bidelman (1983), B18: Bastian & Anton (2018), C05: Carquillat et al. (2005), C84: Corbally (1984), D79: Drilling (1979), D18: Dorda et al. (2018), E94: Evans & Lyons (1994), E13: Evans et al. (2013), G00: Griffin & Griffin (2000), G02: Ginestet & Carquillat (2002), G04: Gray & Skiff (2004), G06: Griffin et al. (2006), H69: Humphreys (1969), H72: Humphreys et al. (1972), H82: Hendry (1982), J60: Jaschek & Jaschek (1960), K89: Keenan & McNeil (1989), M55: Morgan et al. (1955), M69: Markowitz (1969), M74: Moffat (1974), M02: Miroshnichenko et al. (2002), M07: Munari et al. (2007), N85: Noordanus et al. (1985), N20: Negueruela et al. (2020, submitted). P98: Parsons & Ake (1998), P04: Pourbaix et al. (2004), S14: Skiff (2014), S17: Samus' et al. (2017), Z01: Zickgraf (2001).

A machine-readable version of the table is available.

3. Results

We have found 108 Galactic RSG+B binary systems in the literature, with 61% of the sample already present in two references alone (Ginestet & Carquillat 2002; Samus' et al. 2017). A significant number of the objects have two entries in the HD catalog, a likely consequence of the composite nature of the spectra. The total number in the sample has to be taken with care, as literature spectral classifications can include gross errors (see e.g., Maíz Apellániz et al. 2016). Also, RSGs in the spectral classification sense we are using here should not be identified with RSGs in the stellar evolution sense: some in our list are Cepheids and others may be bright AGB stars or even more peculiar objects (e.g., β Cyg A, Bastian & Anton 2018, or V838 Mon, Munari et al. 2007). Nevertheless, the number of known Galactic RSG+B systems is much larger than the one claimed by N19 and indeed it is not that different from the value found by those authors for the other four large galaxies in the Local Group. Nine of the eleven stars in N19 are in our sample.AL Vel and Algol are missing because they do not satisfy the luminosity class requirement.

Obviously, there must be many more Galactic RSG+B systems to be discovered. Two biases are a sign of this. 71% of the sample is brighter than V = 8 and 67% is in the northern hemisphere (despite the southern hemisphere containing many more Galactic disk stars). Future studies are required to find them and improve our statistics on these important systems. Interestingly, there are no known Galactic RSG+O binary systems. There are, however, known Galactic BSG+O systems (e.g.,HD 115 071, Sota et al. 2014, BSG = B-type supergiant) and at least one ASG+O system (6 Cas, Bartaya et al. 1994, ASG = A-type supergiant). This is a likely manifestation of the H-D limit (Humphreys & Davidson 1979).

(a) M.P.G. and J.M.A. and (b) I.N. acknowledge support from the Spanish Government Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades through grants (a) PGC2018-095 049-B-C22 and (b) PGC2018-093 741-B-C21, respectively. R.H.B. acknowledges support from DIDULS Project 18 143 and the ESAC visitors program. This research has made extensive use of the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France.

Please wait… references are loading.
10.3847/2515-5172/ab712b