Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS
Some numerical values in Table 3 of the published article are incorrect. There was an error in the code for the program that computed the secondary ionization rates caused by radiation from internal sources (main-sequence stars, active binaries, and white dwarf stars). The most significant changes are in the listed fractional values in the columns for , , and that apply to the rows for , , and . The numbers for and arising from and for these three internal sources have also changed. After correcting the errors in these relative rates, the total ionization rates changed by amounts that are small and do not have a significant impact on conclusions elsewhere in the paper.
The ionization rates for Ar+ are different than before because they now include the additional cross sections for inner shell electrons and somewhat lower rates for the outermost shell (Verner & Yakovlev 1995). Again, these changes do not impact the results expressed elsewhere.
In Table 4, the rate for Total Γ(H0) in column (2) should be revised to equal that in the new version of Table 3.
Table 3. Ionization Rates from Known Sourcesa
Ionization | Rate | Relative Contributionb | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sourcec | () | |||||
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
5.36 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.52 | 0.013 | 0.048 | |
2.53 | 0.69 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 1.9e-3 | 0.033 | |
0.202 | 0.11 | 0.050 | 0.17 | 4.5e-3 | 0.67 | |
2.09 | 0.96 | 0.033 | 4.6e-3 | 4.2e-5 | 1.0e-5 | |
0.166 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | |
4.60 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | |
12.4 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | |
Total Γ(H0) | 27.4 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ |
31.5 | 0.87 | 0.037 | 0.088 | 2.3e-3 | 7.5e-3 | |
21.4 | 0.96 | 0.015 | 0.019 | 2.2e-4 | 3.6e-3 | |
0.449 | 0.63 | 0.022 | 0.071 | 1.9e-3 | 0.27 | |
16.9 | 0.99 | 4.8e-3 | 6.1e-4 | 5.6e-6 | 1.2e-6 | |
0.912 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | |
6.61 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | |
14.4 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | |
Total | 92.2 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ |
16.9 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | |
8.31 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | |
0.0977 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | |
0.224 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | |
0.316 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | |
Total Γ(He+)d | 25.8 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ |
250.0 | 0.93 | 0.018 | 0.043 | 1.1e-3 | 3.9e- 3 | |
66.0 | 0.95 | 0.018 | 0.022 | 2.7e-4 | 4.9e-3 | |
8.77 | 0.92 | 4.4e-3 | 0.015 | 4.0e-4 | 0.059 | |
44.8 | 0.99 | 5.9e-3 | 8.2e-4 | 7.5e-6 | 1.8e-6 | |
1.35 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | |
87.1 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | |
113.0 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | |
Total | 571.0 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ |
207.0 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | |
44.3 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | |
8.98 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | |
6.87 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | |
0.925 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | |
Total Γ(Ar+)d | 305.6 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ |
Notes.
aThe internal rates (with subscripts MS, AB, and WD) are based on a volume density . Such rates scale inversely with density (although not exactly so, because the secondary ionization efficiencies change when xe changes). bFractions of the values shown in column (2). See Equations (6), (A1), (A2), (A3), and (A4). cMeaning of the subscripts that follow the different forms of Γ: ext. = external X-ray background radiation (Section 7.1), MS = embedded main-sequence stars (Section 7.2.1), AB = embedded active binary stars (Section 7.2.2), and WD = embedded WD stars (Section 7.2.3). dThe total ionization rates for the ions He+ and Ar+ do not include the ionizations from secondary electrons or cosmic rays. Hence, these totals underestimate the true rates.The author thanks Dr. Jean-Marc Casandjian for posing questions about the internal secondary ionization rates that led to the discovery of the errors.