The following article is Free article

Erratum: "The Fractional Ionization of the Warm Neutral Interstellar Medium" (2013, ApJ, 764, 25)

Published 2020 September 3 © 2020. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Edward B. Jenkins 2020 ApJ 900 90 DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/abb084

Download Article PDF
DownloadArticle ePub

You need an eReader or compatible software to experience the benefits of the ePub3 file format.

This is a correction for 2013 ApJ 764 25

0004-637X/900/1/90

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Some numerical values in Table 3 of the published article are incorrect. There was an error in the code for the program that computed the secondary ionization rates caused by radiation from internal sources (main-sequence stars, active binaries, and white dwarf stars). The most significant changes are in the listed fractional values in the columns for ${{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{s,{{\rm{H}}}^{0}}$, ${{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{s,{\mathrm{He}}^{0}}$, and ${{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{s,{\mathrm{He}}^{+}}$ that apply to the rows for ${\rm{\Gamma }}{({{\rm{H}}}^{0})}_{\mathrm{MS}}$, ${\rm{\Gamma }}{({{\rm{H}}}^{0})}_{\mathrm{AB}}$, and ${\rm{\Gamma }}{({{\rm{H}}}^{0})}_{\mathrm{WD}}$. The numbers for ${\rm{\Gamma }}({\mathrm{He}}^{0})$ and ${\rm{\Gamma }}({{\rm{Ar}}}^{0})$ arising from ${{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{s,{\mathrm{He}}^{0}}$ and ${{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{s,{\mathrm{He}}^{+}}$ for these three internal sources have also changed. After correcting the errors in these relative rates, the total ionization rates changed by amounts that are small and do not have a significant impact on conclusions elsewhere in the paper.

The ionization rates for Ar+ are different than before because they now include the additional cross sections for inner shell electrons and somewhat lower rates for the outermost shell (Verner & Yakovlev 1995). Again, these changes do not impact the results expressed elsewhere.

In Table 4, the rate for Total Γ(H0) in column (2) should be revised to equal that in the new version of Table 3.

Table 3.  Ionization Rates from Known Sourcesa

Ionization Rate Relative Contributionb
Sourcec (${10}^{-17}\,{{\rm{s}}}^{-1}$) ${{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{p}$ ${{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{s,{{\rm{H}}}^{0}}$ ${{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{s,{\mathrm{He}}^{0}}$ ${{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{s,{\mathrm{He}}^{+}}$ ${{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{{s}^{{\prime} }}$
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
${\rm{\Gamma }}{({{\rm{H}}}^{0})}_{\mathrm{ext}.}$ 5.36 0.20 0.22 0.52 0.013 0.048
${\rm{\Gamma }}{({{\rm{H}}}^{0})}_{\mathrm{MS}}$ 2.53 0.69 0.12 0.15 1.9e-3 0.033
${\rm{\Gamma }}{({{\rm{H}}}^{0})}_{\mathrm{AB}}$ 0.202 0.11 0.050 0.17 4.5e-3 0.67
${\rm{\Gamma }}{({{\rm{H}}}^{0})}_{\mathrm{WD}}$ 2.09 0.96 0.033 4.6e-3 4.2e-5 1.0e-5
${{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{{\mathrm{He}}^{+}}({{\rm{H}}}^{0})$ 0.166
${{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{{\mathrm{He}}^{0}}({{\rm{H}}}^{0})$ 4.60
${\zeta }_{\mathrm{CR}}({{\rm{H}}}^{0})$ 12.4
Total Γ(H0) 27.4
${\rm{\Gamma }}{({\mathrm{He}}^{0})}_{\mathrm{ext}.}$ 31.5 0.87 0.037 0.088 2.3e-3 7.5e-3
${\rm{\Gamma }}{({\mathrm{He}}^{0})}_{\mathrm{MS}}$ 21.4 0.96 0.015 0.019 2.2e-4 3.6e-3
${\rm{\Gamma }}{({\mathrm{He}}^{0})}_{\mathrm{AB}}$ 0.449 0.63 0.022 0.071 1.9e-3 0.27
${\rm{\Gamma }}{({\mathrm{He}}^{0})}_{\mathrm{WD}}$ 16.9 0.99 4.8e-3 6.1e-4 5.6e-6 1.2e-6
${{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{{\mathrm{He}}^{+}}({\mathrm{He}}^{0})$ 0.912
${{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{{\mathrm{He}}^{0}}({\mathrm{He}}^{0})$ 6.61
${\zeta }_{\mathrm{CR}}({\mathrm{He}}^{0})$ 14.4
Total ${\rm{\Gamma }}({\mathrm{He}}^{0})$ 92.2
${\rm{\Gamma }}{({\mathrm{He}}^{+})}_{\mathrm{ext}.}$ 16.9
${\rm{\Gamma }}{({\mathrm{He}}^{+})}_{\mathrm{MS}}$ 8.31
${\rm{\Gamma }}{({\mathrm{He}}^{+})}_{\mathrm{AB}}$ 0.0977
${\rm{\Gamma }}{({\mathrm{He}}^{+})}_{\mathrm{WD}}$ 0.224
${{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{{\mathrm{He}}^{+}}({\mathrm{He}}^{+})$ 0.316
Total Γ(He+)d 25.8
${\rm{\Gamma }}{({\mathrm{Ar}}^{0})}_{\mathrm{ext}.}$ 250.0 0.93 0.018 0.043 1.1e-3 3.9e- 3
${\rm{\Gamma }}{({\mathrm{Ar}}^{0})}_{\mathrm{MS}}$ 66.0 0.95 0.018 0.022 2.7e-4 4.9e-3
${\rm{\Gamma }}{({\mathrm{Ar}}^{0})}_{\mathrm{AB}}$ 8.77 0.92 4.4e-3 0.015 4.0e-4 0.059
${\rm{\Gamma }}{({\mathrm{Ar}}^{0})}_{\mathrm{WD}}$ 44.8 0.99 5.9e-3 8.2e-4 7.5e-6 1.8e-6
${{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{{\mathrm{He}}^{+}}({\mathrm{Ar}}^{0})$ 1.35
${{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{{\mathrm{He}}^{0}}({\mathrm{Ar}}^{0})$ 87.1
${\zeta }_{\mathrm{CR}}({\mathrm{Ar}}^{0})$ 113.0
Total ${\rm{\Gamma }}({\mathrm{Ar}}^{0})$ 571.0
${\rm{\Gamma }}{({\mathrm{Ar}}^{+})}_{\mathrm{ext}.}$ 207.0
${\rm{\Gamma }}{({\mathrm{Ar}}^{+})}_{\mathrm{MS}}$ 44.3
${\rm{\Gamma }}{({\mathrm{Ar}}^{+})}_{\mathrm{AB}}$ 8.98
${\rm{\Gamma }}{({\mathrm{Ar}}^{+})}_{\mathrm{WD}}$ 6.87
${{\rm{\Gamma }}}_{{\mathrm{He}}^{+}}({\mathrm{Ar}}^{+})$ 0.925
Total Γ(Ar+)d 305.6

Notes.

aThe internal rates (with subscripts MS, AB, and WD) are based on a volume density $n({{\rm{H}}}_{\mathrm{tot}})=0.5\,{\mathrm{cm}}^{-3}$. Such rates scale inversely with density (although not exactly so, because the secondary ionization efficiencies change when xe changes). bFractions of the values shown in column (2). See Equations (6), (A1), (A2), (A3), and (A4). cMeaning of the subscripts that follow the different forms of Γ: ext. = external X-ray background radiation (Section 7.1), MS = embedded main-sequence stars (Section 7.2.1), AB = embedded active binary stars (Section 7.2.2), and WD = embedded WD stars (Section 7.2.3). dThe total ionization rates for the ions He+ and Ar+ do not include the ionizations from secondary electrons or cosmic rays. Hence, these totals underestimate the true rates.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

The author thanks Dr. Jean-Marc Casandjian for posing questions about the internal secondary ionization rates that led to the discovery of the errors.

Please wait… references are loading.
10.3847/1538-4357/abb084