Chemical Abundances of Main-sequence, Turnoff, Subgiant, and Red Giant Stars from APOGEE Spectra. II. Atomic Diffusion in M67 Stars

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and

Published 2019 March 27 © 2019. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Diogo Souto et al 2019 ApJ 874 97 DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0b43

Download Article PDF
DownloadArticle ePub

You need an eReader or compatible software to experience the benefits of the ePub3 file format.

0004-637X/874/1/97

Abstract

Chemical abundances for 15 elements (C, N, O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, and Ni) are presented for 83 stellar members of the 4 Gyr old solar-metallicity open cluster M67. The sample contains stars spanning a wide range of evolutionary phases, from G dwarfs to red clump stars. The abundances were derived from near-IR (λ1.5–1.7 μm) high-resolution spectra (R = 22,500) from the SDSS-IV/Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE) survey. A 1D local thermodynamic equilibrium abundance analysis was carried out using the APOGEE synthetic spectral libraries, via χ2 minimization of the synthetic and observed spectra with the qASPCAP code. We found significant abundance differences (∼0.05–0.30 dex) between the M67 member stars as a function of the stellar mass (or position on the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram), where the abundance patterns exhibit a general depletion (in [X/H]) in stars at the main-sequence turnoff. The amount of the depletion is different for different elements. We find that atomic diffusion models provide, in general, good agreement with the abundance trends for most chemical species, supporting recent studies indicating that measurable atomic diffusion operates in M67 stars.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. Introduction

M67 (Messier 67; NGC 2682) is a well-studied open cluster, with an age and metallicity (4 Gyr and [Fe/H] = 0.0, respectively) similar to those of the Sun. A number of studies have determined the distance to the cluster (Yadav et al. 2008), its age (Yadav et al. 2008, Sarajedini et al. 2009), photometric colors and reddening (Taylor 2007, Sarajedini et al. 2009), as well as metallicity and individual chemical abundances (Cohen 1980, Foy & Proust 1981; Tautvaišiene et al. 2000; Pancino et al. 2010; Jacobson et al. 2011; Önehag et al. 2014; Liu et al. 2016; Bertelli Motta et al. 2018; Gao et al. 2018, and Souto et al. 2018). M67 is a "benchmark" Galactic open cluster and an excellent laboratory in which to study poorly understood processes in stellar astrophysics, such as abundance variations in open clusters.

The chemical composition of a star is inherited from the interstellar matter from which it forms; however, this composition changes over time due to internal stellar processes, such as gravitational settling or atomic diffusion. The approximation employed in the determination of abundances can also induce systematic errors in the inferred abundances, creating an apparent lack of homogeneity. Examples of such simplifications are the assumptions of hydrostatic equilibrium or local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE).

Stellar clusters are useful astrophysical environments to study elemental abundance variations because of the reasonable assumption that stars in a cluster were born from the same molecular cloud at the same time. Several authors have studied the initial chemical homogeneity of open and globular clusters (De Silva et al. 2006, 2007, Reddy et al. 2012; Bovy 2016) and have, so far, not found any evidence of inhomogeneities in the initial stellar populations of open and globular clusters.

One well-known process that has been extensively observed in clusters is that as stars evolve into red giants, their surface carbon and nitrogen abundances are altered by the convectively driven first dredge-up of material from the stellar interior that has been exposed to H burning via the CN cycle (Bressan et al. 2012; Lagarde et al. 2012; Choi et al. 2016). This process does not, however, explain the lack of uniformity in the elemental abundances of main-sequence and turnoff stars found in metal-poor globular clusters (Korn et al. 2007, Lind et al. 2008; Nordlander et al. 2012). These variations are instead explained by atomic diffusion, a fundamental process predicted by theory (Michaud et al. 2015, references therein) and operating in all stars, which is often ignored in stellar evolution models and abundance studies. Atomic diffusion represents the physical process that involves the transport of material in the stellar atmosphere that is described by a diffusion equation, for example, gravitational settling. Atomic diffusion has a physical basis, with diffusion coefficients predicted by theory; see Chapman (1917a, 1917b), Aller & Chapman (1960), Michaud et al. (1976), Vauclair et al. (1978), Michaud (1980), Vauclair & Vauclair (1982), and Michaud et al. (2004).

Diffusion in stars having a solar age and metallicity, as is the case for members of M67, has been theoretically investigated by Michaud et al. (2004), who analyzed 28 elements, finding that He, Li, Be, B, Mg, P, Ti, Fe, and Ni were those most affected by this mechanism. One of their conclusions was that atomic diffusion models can have a significant impact on the stellar ages derived from isochrones. More recently, theoretical calculations by Dotter et al. (2017) concluded that atomic diffusion also plays an important role in stars with a solar age and metallicity (not only metal-poor stars), and they found that the photospheric iron abundance in turnoff stars can be depleted by ∼0.12 dex compared to their initial surface abundance as a consequence of atomic diffusion processes. Dotter et al. (2017) noted that ignoring diffusion in models would cause an additional uncertainty of about 10% in the stellar ages derived from isochrones.

Evidence for the occurrence of diffusion in M67 stars has been found previously by Önehag et al. (2014), who studied a sample of 14 stars belonging to M67, including main-sequence stars (six), turnoff (three), and the early subgiant branch (five), using high-resolution optical spectra from FLAMES/UVES on the Very Large Telescope (VLT). Önehag et al. (2014) found abundance differences among the groups of 0.05–0.10 dex for Al, Ca, Cr, Mn, and Fe, with turnoff stars having lower abundances than subgiants. Blanco-Cuaresma et al. (2015) compiled a sample of 42 stars in M67 (28 main sequence and 14 red giants) using spectra from the ESPaDOnS twin spectropolarimeter atop Pic du Midi (NARVAL), High Accuracy Radial velocity Planet Searcher (HARPS), and Ultraviolet and Visual Echelle Spectrograph (UVES). The authors observed that the abundances of Na, Mg, and Si show variations of up to 0.10–0.20 dex between dwarf and giant stars in the cluster.

Souto et al. (2018, Paper I) studied a small sample of eight M67 stellar members spanning a range of evolutionary phases, including G dwarfs (two), G-turnoff stars (two), G subgiants (two), and red clump K giants (two) using high-resolution spectra from the Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE; Majewski et al. 2017). They found abundance variations in 14 elements across the Hertzsprung–Russell (H-R) diagram, confirming that most chemical species display changes in the range of 0.05–0.20 dex (Fe, Na, Mg, Al, Si, Ca, and Mn), with the lower abundances observed in turnoff stars, with M ∼1.2M. Souto et al. (2018) also showed that the abundance variations found in M67 stars compare very well with theoretical models of atomic diffusion for stars having solar age and metallicity. Also using APOGEE spectra, Bertran de Lis et al. (2016) found significantly more dispersion in [O/Fe] for M67 stars than for other clusters with similar metallicity but younger ages, such as NGC 6819 or NGC 2158. Bovy (2016) and Price-Jones & Bovy (2018) found strong constraints on the chemical homogeneity in M67 red giant stars from APOGEE. The authors showed that M67 red giants are homogeneous based only on their stellar spectra, without the need of modeling the stellar atmosphere. The uniformity within the red giant stars may indicate that changes in the stellar abundances across different evolutionary phases in the H-R diagram for M67 might be related to physical processes operating within these stars.

The works of Bertelli Motta et al. (2018) and Gao et al. (2018) have confirmed, using independent data, that atomic diffusion operates in M67 stars. Both works used high-resolution optical spectra. Bertelli Motta et al. (2018) used UVES/FLAMES (R ∼ 20,000–32,000) observations from the Gaia/ESO survey (Gilmore et al. 2012, Randich et al. 2013), reporting abundances of 11 elements in 15 stars from the main sequence, turnoff, and red giant branch (RGB). Bertelli Motta et al. (2018), using APOGEE data, find abundance variations of up to 0.20–0.30 dex for elements like Al, Mn, and Ni, where non-LTE effects are unlikely to explain the observed trends. Gao et al. (2018) use spectra from the GALAH survey (De Silva et al. 2015), with a resolving power of R ∼ 28,000, to report abundances for seven elements in 66 stars from the turnoff, subgiant, red giant, and red clump phases. Gao et al. (2018) conclude that deviations from non-LTE can explain some of the observed abundance trends as a function of the evolutionary stage, in particular for oxygen and sodium. However, for Al and Si, non-LTE does not explain the remaining trend, which the authors argue might be a consequence of diffusion processes in M67.

This work provides a complementary verification of the atomic diffusion mechanisms acting in M67 stars as reported by Souto et al. (2018). We use APOGEE results obtained with the qASPCAP15 pipeline using a much larger stellar sample; qASPCAP is a simple IDL script that substitutes the entire ASPCAP (APOGEE Stellar Parameters and Chemical Abundances Pipeline, García Pérez et al. 2016) for boutique work.

APOGEE targeted M67 as one of its calibration clusters, observing about 100 stellar members from the lower main sequence, the turnoff, the subgiant branch, and the RGB. The M67 APOGEE sample is well suited both to probe the limits on chemical homogeneity in the cluster members and to search for signatures of atomic diffusion in the chemical abundances of a number of elements. APOGEE spectra are used here to derive detailed chemical abundances of 15 elements: C, N, O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, and Ni.

The paper is structured as follows: in Section 2 we describe the adopted sample, in Section 3 we report on the atmospheric parameters and the methodology employed to derive the individual abundances, in Section 4 we analyze the abundance trends, and in Section 5 we suggest possible explanations for them. In Section 6 we discuss the obtained results, summarizing in Section 7.

2. APOGEE Data on M67

The APOGEE spectrographs are cryogenic multifiber near-infrared instruments covering the H band between λ1.51 μm and λ1.69 μm, obtaining high-resolution (R = λλ ∼ 22,500) spectra for 300 objects at a time (Gunn et al. 2006; Wilson et al. 2010). The spectrographs are currently mounted in both hemispheres on 2.5 m telescopes at APO (Apache Point Observatory, New Mexico, USA) and at LCO (Las Campanas Observatory, La Serena, Chile). The M67 stellar spectra analyzed in this work were all obtained at APO and reduced with the APOGEE pipeline, described in Nidever et al. (2015).

APOGEE is part of the SDSS-III and SDSS-IV projects (Eisenstein et al. 2011, Blanton et al. 2017), and M67 is one of the calibration clusters for the ASPCAP pipeline (Mészáros et al. 2013; Zasowski et al. 2013; Holtzman et al. 2015; García Pérez et al. 2016). APOGEE has observed a dedicated field in the direction of M67 (location ID 4162), obtaining spectra for 563 targets. The stars had multiple visits, generally more than three, to reach the required signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of the combined spectra (higher than ∼100 per half a resolution element); this was achieved for stars brighter than H ≤ 11.

To verify membership of the observed stars in the M67 APOGEE field, we adopt two approaches, one using membership studies from the literature and another using distances and proper motions from Gaia DR2 (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2018). We initially used the radial velocities (RV) measured by the APOGEE pipeline available in the 14th SDSS data release (DR14, Abolfathi et al. 2018), following the proper motion and RV membership criteria of Yadav et al. (2008) and Geller et al. (2015) as guidelines. Yadav et al. (2008) determined proper motions for 2462 stars using the Wide-Field-Imager from the MPG/ESO 2.2 m telescope at La Silla, Chile, with a field of view of 34 × 33 arcmin2. The authors reported 434 stars having membership probabilities ≥90%. Using the same data, Bellini et al. (2010) derived the cluster average proper motion to be μα cos(δ) = −9.6 ± 1.1 mas yr−1 and μδ = −3.7 ± 0.8 mas yr−1. The radial velocity survey by Geller et al. (2015) used spectra obtained from various sources, including a total of 1278 stars in the vicinity of M67. Geller et al. (2015) reported 590 stars having membership probabilities ≥90%, where the mean radial velocity of the sample is 33.64 km s−1, with high internal precision (0.03 km s−1).

Based on this information, an initial membership cut was performed, selecting from the targets observed in the M67 APOGEE field (563 stars), those within the radial velocity range 30.64–36.64 km s−1. Figure 1 (top left panel) shows a histogram of the RV distribution of all the stars in the field. The peak of the RV distribution compares well with the mean radial velocity for the cluster reported by Geller et al. (2015), with 140 stars falling within the RV limit (red dashed lines). We then performed a cross-match between the stars within the limit in radial velocity and those stars reported by Yadav et al. (2008) and Geller et al. (2015) having membership probabilities ≥90%. A total of 119 stars satisfied these criteria.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Top left panel: radial velocity distribution obtained from ASPCAP for all of the targets observed in the APOGEE M67 field. Bottom left panel: vector-point diagram with the adopted stellar proper motions. Top right panel: (JKs)0 vs. H0 diagram showing the sample of this work. We represent the main-sequence stars as blue diamonds, blue squares are the turnoff stars, the blue triangles are the subgiants, and the blue circles represent the red giant stars. We also include the stellar sample of Souto et al. (2018) using the same symbol notation for the stellar classes, but colored as red. The 2MASS color–magnitude diagram of the APOGEE targets in the M67 field is shown as orange dots. Two isochrones for an age of 4 Gyr, (m–M)0 = 9.60, and [Fe/H] = 0.00 from PARSEC (black line) and the MESA Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST; brown line) are also shown. We left as open symbols the stars with S/N < 100. Bottom right panel: same as top right panel, expect the color–magnitude diagram using Gaia DR2 data for (GBPGRP)0 vs. G0.

Standard image High-resolution image

We then adopted Gaia DR2 (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2018) proper motions with distances from Bailer-Jones et al. (2018) to refine the sample. From those 140 stars within the RV limits, we find 109 within the ranges in distance and proper motion for M67. We accepted stars with distances in the range 796.2–992.0 pc, which corresponds to a distance modulus of 9.56–9.88, as reported in the literature for the cluster (Yadav et al. 2008, Yakut et al. 2009). We then adopted the mean proper motions observed for the stars within the adopted distance limits, where μαcos(δ) = −11.02 ± 0.07 mas yr−1 and μδ = −2.97 ± 0.05 mas yr−1. We consider as members the stars within ±1 mas yr−1 from those mean values. Figure 1 bottom left panel displays the proper motions for the sample.

We removed from the sample two hot stars (2M08512643 + 1143506 and 2M08513259+1148520) likely to be blue stragglers. In the final sample, we will only retain the stars with Gaia DR2 data, confirming the membership criteria based on distances and proper motions. We searched for binary stars in our sample looking for RV variations in the multiple spectral visits, with none found. Also, we verify the lack of binary stars in comparing our sample (44 stars in common) with the recent work of El-Badry et al. (2018), where the authors detected more than 3000 binary stars in the APOGEE data. To ensure the quality of the observed spectra, we keep only those having S/N ≥ 100, resulting in a sample of 83 stars spanning the H-R diagram, from the main sequence to the red clump. The threshold in S/N is intended to minimize the uncertainties in the parameters derived. As we are searching for small abundance variations across the H-R diagram, we assemble the best possible sample. We will include the results reported by Souto et al. (2018) as a control or comparison sample. In Table 1 we present our sample, with the adopted radial velocity and S/N (from DR14), proper motions and distances (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2018), membership probabilities computed by Geller et al. (2015) and the adopted magnitudes, V (Zacharias et al. 2015), and 2MASS infrared magnitudes J, H, and KS (Skrutskie et al. 2006). At the bottom of the table, we also provide data for those stars with S/N < 100.

Table 1.  Stellar Properties

2Mass ID RV σ(RV) PM (R.A.) PM (R.A.) PM (Decl.) PM (Decl.) Dist BJ18 Dist (σ) S/N Prob Prob Prob Prob Prob J H Ks
  (km s−1) σ(km s−1) (μα cos(δ)) σ (μδ) σ parsec parsec   G15 Y08 Z93 G89 S77      
Red Giants                                  
2M08492491+1144057 35.09 1.51 −11.06 0.07 −2.87 0.05 829.45 28.15 460 98 99 99 99 2 10.296 9.831 9.708
2M08503613+1143180 34.29 0.11 −11.06 0.07 −2.74 0.06 873.89 24.21 138 72 100 93 97 94 11.131 10.644 10.552
2M08504964+1135089 34.92 0.07 −10.96 0.08 −2.96 0.06 832.42 28.06 344 98 99 94 99 95 9.410 8.848 8.722
2M08511269+1152423 34.34 0.07 −10.95 0.06 −2.98 0.04 818.41 12.56 1445 98 99 99 96 95 8.650 8.122 7.976
2M08511704+1150464 33.58 0.06 −11.16 0.07 −3.32 0.05 829.68 28.19 371 98 99 77 97 95 9.284 8.712 8.606
2M08511897+1158110 34.01 0.10 −11.08 0.06 −3.09 0.04 847.08 23.29 384 98 100 94 98 51 10.587 10.095 10.012
2M08512156+1146061 34.87 0.06 −11.10 0.08 −2.66 0.05 834.37 31.65 314 97 98 91 99 95 9.602 9.085 8.947
2M08512618+1153520 34.16 0.04 −11.00 0.07 −2.88 0.05 842.43 14.79 982 97 97 77 99 95 8.619 8.113 7.960
2M08512898+1150330 33.46 0.04 −11.14 0.08 −3.22 0.05 812.29 18.46 481 98 100 94 98 95 8.566 8.072 7.958
2M08512990+1147168 36.28 0.01 −11.27 0.09 −3.73 0.05 795.23 34.60 884 98 99 0 96 96 7.314 6.681 6.489
2M08513577+1153347 34.05 0.11 −11.06 0.06 −2.93 0.04 801.49 20.07 205 98 93 99 72 95 10.522 10.023 9.941
2M08513938+1151456 33.98 0.11 −11.10 0.07 −3.12 0.04 834.61 26.61 469 98 100 95 99 93 10.383 9.889 9.795
2M08514234+1150076 34.27 0.05 −11.02 0.07 −2.80 0.05 805.95 23.64 271 98 0 99 99 96 9.829 9.339 9.187
2M08514388+1156425 32.94 0.05 −11.18 0.11 −3.16 0.07 844.60 22.86 505 95 100 99 98 91 8.618 8.114 7.996
2M08514507+1147459 32.97 0.04 −11.05 0.07 −3.03 0.04 839.67 26.03 281 97 99 2 92 92 9.684 9.183 9.045
2M08514883+1156511 34.35 0.05 −10.96 0.08 −3.26 0.05 858.95 35.02 135 97 99 99 99 94 11.256 10.779 10.705
2M08515611+1150147 34.68 0.04 −11.13 0.08 −3.89 0.05 843.67 28.77 133 98 99 99 98 95 11.197 10.726 10.634
2M08515952+1155049 34.39 0.05 −11.00 0.09 −3.10 0.06 868.56 21.45 543 98 99 88 91 90 8.597 8.084 7.959
2M08521097+1131491 33.82 0.03 −11.06 0.06 −2.76 0.04 822.72 23.87 672 98 100 92 98 96 8.921 8.388 8.252
2M08521656+1119380 33.82 0.03 −11.05 0.07 −2.88 0.05 808.61 30.73 1073 97 100 71 38 94 7.875 7.233 7.119
2M08521856+1144263 33.65 0.06 −11.13 0.07 −3.14 0.05 818.62 13.28 504 96 100 95 98 94 8.572 8.087 7.923
2M08522636+1141277 33.41 0.10 −10.77 0.08 −2.99 0.05 784.76 28.62 196 97 99 99 99 0 10.845 10.314 10.263
2M08525625+1148539 32.84 0.07 −11.02 0.08 −3.10 0.05 870.52 33.96 195 97 99 99 99 77 10.839 10.315 10.224
2M08534672+1123307 33.04 0.07 −11.24 0.08 −2.79 0.05 864.38 32.99 370 nan nan nan nan nan 10.225 9.730 9.624
2M08493465+1151256 33.98 0.08 −10.98 0.06 −2.92 0.04 904.59 nan 1369 98 98 99 91 96 7.203 6.546 6.394
2M08505816+1152223 34.03 0.11 −11.13 0.08 −2.86 0.05 884.25 34.01 287 98 99 99 96 91 11.197 10.707 10.626
2M08510723+1153019 32.99 30.95 −10.92 0.07 −2.41 0.05 903.98 21.87 604 11 100 99 97 71 11.175 10.771 10.695
2M08510839+1147121 33.52 0.18 −10.91 0.08 −2.93 0.06 888.63 28.60 171 98 98 99 99 93 10.691 10.195 10.112
2M08522003+1127362 33.94 0.05 −11.22 0.07 −2.91 0.04 893.78 28.66 260 98 99 93 91 89 10.839 10.383 10.253
Subgiants                                  
2M08504994+1149127 33.83 0.10 −10.83 0.07 −3.27 0.05 809.79 28.26 110 98 100 94 97 93 11.372 10.960 10.890
2M08510325+1145473 35.11 0.21 −11.07 0.08 −2.91 0.06 829.30 27.10 103 61 96 54 99 95 11.491 11.220 11.187
2M08511564+1150561 34.01 0.03 −10.73 0.07 −2.78 0.05 785.07 21.58 209 86 100 99 98 94 11.485 11.094 11.013
2M08511670+1145293 35.48 0.21 −11.26 0.13 −2.41 0.09 843.16 51.73 140 nan nan nan nan nan 11.021 10.662 10.570
2M08512122+1145526 33.49 0.69 −11.74 0.09 −2.47 0.06 852.74 38.64 110 98 98 95 99 95 11.135 10.888 10.835
2M08512879+1151599 33.59 0.13 −10.91 0.07 −3.04 0.05 840.04 26.19 116 98 97 99 99 92 11.433 11.104 11.024
2M08512935+1145275 33.14 0.06 −10.74 0.07 −2.98 0.04 837.93 27.28 135 98 98 99 99 95 11.287 10.864 10.754
2M08513540+1157564 33.39 0.05 −11.10 0.07 −3.01 0.04 848.14 24.64 238 98 96 96 99 95 11.447 11.143 11.030
2M08513862+1220141 33.74 0.12 −10.95 0.08 −3.00 0.05 858.14 32.96 251 98 25 99 97 93 11.298 10.866 10.791
2M08514401+1146245 33.11 0.13 −11.10 0.07 −2.89 0.05 870.91 29.12 116 95 99 99 98 95 11.438 11.110 11.027
2M08514474+1146460 33.12 0.06 −11.06 0.07 −3.12 0.04 798.50 23.63 351 98 100 99 98 92 11.357 10.918 10.822
2M08514994+1149311 33.33 0.13 −11.35 0.07 −3.10 0.04 858.19 27.21 205 98 99 99 99 0 11.494 11.196 11.148
2M08515335+1148208 34.28 0.04 −11.44 0.07 −2.94 0.04 817.06 26.68 189 98 99 7. nan 99 90 11.625 11.390
2M08521134+1145380 33.05 0.04 −10.98 0.07 −2.99 0.04 858.43 27.32 113 98 98 99 37 0 11.452 11.082 10.993
2M08503667+1148553 35.36 0.22 −11.43 0.06 −3.11 0.04 899.99 30.68 162 97 99 99 98 96 11.930 11.628 11.578
2M08505569+1152146 34.08 0.09 −11.01 0.18 −2.84 0.13 930.54 57.06 425 97 99 99 95 95 10.852 10.586 10.515
2M08510106+1150108 32.90 0.14 −10.79 0.09 −2.93 0.06 899.78 30.39 117 97 100 93 98 87 11.380 11.018 10.951
2M08510951+1141449 32.36 0.08 −10.33 0.07 −3.11 0.06 897.57 30.12 113 97 100 99 47 0 11.445 11.102 10.997
2M08511877+1151186 34.07 0.10 −10.98 0.07 −2.74 0.05 883.67 33.72 333 98 0.0 99 99 95 11.502 11.089 11.020
2M08515567+1217573 33.52 0.05 −10.99 0.08 −2.86 0.06 935.73 37.02 226 96 100 99 98 96 11.516 11.115 11.005
Turnoff                                  
2M08503392+1146272 33.78 0.14 −10.97 0.08 −3.05 0.06 869.53 32.54 241 98 99 99 99 96 11.824 11.596 11.517
2M08504079+1147462 34.59 0.06 −10.89 0.07 −3.08 0.05 847.32 28.41 170 98 99 86 98 93 11.793 11.540 11.498
2M08505177+1200247 33.72 0.25 −11.22 0.05 −2.85 0.05 867.93 21.00 146 75 99 16 94 95 12.377 12.106 12.051
2M08505702+1159158 33.96 0.22 −11.06 0.05 −3.72 0.03 840.73 21.18 178 98 100 99 98 94 12.003 11.726 11.673
2M08505762+1155147 33.07 0.24 −10.71 0.04 −2.85 0.03 870.75 17.25 148 98 100 94 98 93 12.294 12.038 11.973
2M08505903+1148576 33.67 0.44 −10.97 0.05 −2.73 0.03 867.89 21.19 118 94 100 99 99 96 12.386 12.206 12.094
2M08505973+1139524 33.21 0.19 −10.62 0.07 −2.74 0.05 831.18 28.29 104 98 100 99 99 96 12.025 11.735 11.703
2M08510969+1159096 33.98 7.27 −10.79 0.04 −2.93 0.03 857.36 14.81 154 98 99 99 72 94 12.658 12.348 12.298
2M08511576+1152587 35.82 0.08 −11.96 0.07 −2.03 0.05 844.46 29.65 162 98 99 99 99 64 11.728 11.453 11.391
2M08512240+1151291 33.44 0.16 −10.94 0.05 −2.96 0.04 853.50 20.51 132 98 99 94 84 79 12.195 11.952 11.862
2M08513710+1154599 34.85 0.05 −10.85 0.04 −2.95 0.03 858.09 19.44 127 96 99 99 0 0 12.096 11.819 11.763
2M08513806+1201243 32.14 0.12 −11.03 0.06 −3.40 0.04 839.80 28.69 144 98 99 99 99 69 11.844 11.551 11.495
2M08514122+1154290 33.61 0.21 −11.15 0.07 −3.06 0.05 820.44 25.67 213 83 98 99 81 94 11.703 11.466 11.397
2M08514475+1145012 34.89 0.20 −10.87 0.04 −2.81 0.03 855.48 18.41 136 98 97 99 99 95 12.288 12.039 11.969
2M08520741+1150221 34.19 0.16 −11.12 0.04 −2.95 0.03 864.00 18.90 202 98 99 99 77 83 12.097 11.823 11.806
Main Sequence                                  
2M08502805+1154505 34.95 0.20 −10.55 0.04 −2.41 0.03 860.00 19.59 122 98 100 99 99 93 12.968 12.665 12.563
2M08511229+1154230 35.13 0.26 −10.81 0.05 −2.87 0.04 850.83 21.65 118 98 97 99 98 91 12.986 12.708 12.623
2M08512314+1154049 33.62 0.33 −10.83 0.05 −2.76 0.03 846.83 20.20 119 98 98 99 93 94 13.017 12.741 12.681
2M08512604+1149555 32.89 0.30 −11.76 0.06 −3.28 0.04 853.19 25.88 137 98 97 99 98 92 13.344 12.987 12.897
2M08512996+1151090 34.82 0.23 −11.07 0.05 −3.08 0.03 855.38 22.12 192 98 99 89 99 93 12.926 12.630 12.599
2M08513119+1153179 34.17 0.30 −10.82 0.04 −2.98 0.03 858.47 19.64 156 98 99 99 97 95 12.603 12.327 12.267
2M08513701+1136516 33.18 0.67 −10.80 0.06 −3.31 0.04 848.99 24.24 100 98 100 92 98 94 13.341 12.932 12.829
2M08514189+1149376 35.88 0.28 −11.02 0.06 −2.92 0.04 862.75 25.07 112 98 98 99 98 95 13.626 13.262 13.189
2M08514742+1147096 31.44 6.03 −11.11 0.05 −3.09 0.03 840.28 19.47 113 98 99 95 99 96 12.880 12.496 12.372
2M08521649+1147382 33.91 0.27 −11.01 0.07 −2.74 0.04 814.76 28.03 120 98 99 99 99 77 13.558 13.221 13.157
2M08505439+1156290 33.73 0.11 −10.74 0.07 −3.19 0.05 919.56 34.20 270 98 98 99 99 95 11.706 11.435 11.372
2M08510076+1153115 34.05 0.28 −10.76 0.06 −2.93 0.05 914.22 28.97 119 96 100 96 97 93 13.474 13.157 13.105
2M08511176+1150018 33.53 0.29 −11.02 0.08 −3.20 0.05 899.09 29.78 127 3 100 96 98 92 13.665 13.120 13.031
2M08512080+1145024 33.77 0.11 −10.51 0.06 −3.81 0.04 889.07 28.43 109 nan 89 97 95 99 11.928 11.679 11.603
2M08512742+1153265 34.28 0.18 −10.87 0.06 −3.09 0.04 948.69 34.44 273 95 96 99 98 95 11.667 11.382 11.342
2M08512788+1155409 36.06 0.18 −11.13 0.04 −2.40 0.03 893.36 18.68 129 98 100 99 99 95 12.168 11.831 11.813
2M08513012+1143498 33.53 0.23 −11.11 0.09 −3.09 0.06 887.79 38.35 102 98 1 99 99 99 12.011 11.761 11.694
2M08513455+1149068 33.53 0.41 −11.05 0.08 −3.20 0.05 887.52 27.47 104 98 91 96 99 95 13.717 13.229 13.121
2M08521868+1143246 32.73 0.18 −10.97 0.07 −2.86 0.04 877.95 32.18 143 98 99 88 99 75 11.590 11.352 11.259
2M08512643+1143506 33.45 0.26 −11.37 0.11 −2.69 0.08 835.57 38.90 121 98 100 96 99 95 11.020 11.011 10.993
2M08513259+1148520 33.74 0.27 −11.30 0.08 −3.11 0.05 791.70 28.99 146 96 98 99 87 0 10.645 10.541 10.526
Excluded sample due                                  
to low S/N (<100)                                  
Subgiant                                  
2M08503438+1139566 33.77 0.21 −10.79 0.07 −2.94 0.05 850.43 27.79 99 98 99 91 98 96 11.513 11.244 11.177
2M08504198+1136525 34.46 0.10 −11.12 0.07 −3.10 0.05 852.64 27.51 91 99 99 99 99 0 11.410 11.062 10.998
2M08510811+1201065 33.83 0.23 −11.70 0.04 −3.02 0.03 875.47 20.06 99 98 96 99 99 95 12.469 12.159 12.073
2M08511826+1150196 34.28 4.21 −10.89 0.06 −2.59 0.04 863.61 27.89 86 98 99 94 98 96 13.042 12.680 12.592
2M08520356+1141238 34.15 0.07 −10.82 0.07 −2.76 0.04 852.79 27.94 99 98 99 99 99 89 11.634 11.365 11.306
Main Sequence                                  
2M08502833+1142097 33.75 0.39 −10.85 0.07 −2.83 0.05 832.76 25.30 64 98 97 99 98 88 11.899 11.654 11.587
2M08503788+1252295 32.37 0.30 −11.83 0.07 −3.44 0.05 801.51 25.81 99 nan nan nan nan nan 13.662 13.239 13.139
2M08505334+1143399 32.72 0.33 −10.89 0.05 −3.92 0.04 841.16 21.35 89 98 100 99 98 94 13.058 12.746 12.628
2M08505923+1146129 31.98 1.78 −10.90 0.05 −2.84 0.03 810.49 18.26 55 98 100 99 98 96 12.271 11.998 11.934
2M08512386+1138521 34.61 0.35 −11.04 0.06 −2.81 0.05 849.79 23.97 89 98 99 99 80 95 13.313 12.952 12.942
2M08513215+1136126 34.34 0.41 −11.22 0.04 −2.83 0.03 869.31 17.26 52 94 96 99 99 89 12.207 11.965 11.910
2M08513444+1137574 34.02 0.12 −10.78 0.04 −2.66 0.03 829.37 17.97 58 98 97 99 67 1 12.102 11.864 11.778
2M08514375+1145148 32.40 0.19 −11.22 0.06 −2.94 0.04 848.12 24.69 55 98 97 99 99 95 12.027 11.805 11.729
2M08514465+1141510 32.95 0.27 −11.33 0.04 −2.95 0.03 860.46 17.58 67 97 99 99 98 95 12.120 11.887 11.802
2M08515290+1146358 34.00 0.53 −11.09 0.09 −2.78 0.05 865.42 23.43 97 98 94 99 99 94 13.961 13.429 13.282
2M08521664+1142300 32.23 3.99 −10.94 0.05 −2.95 0.03 805.89 17.43 70 98 96 99 97 92 12.403 12.144 12.104
2M08504511+1136023 31.15 13.33 −10.81 0.08 −2.70 0.07 842.68 17.27 76 97 99 99 98 71 13.800 13.210 13.123
2M08510131+1141587 32.07 10.61 −11.04 0.04 −2.81 0.03 879.70 20.72 80 96 100 99 98 95 12.420 12.167 12.075
2M08510156+1147501 32.93 0.23 −10.89 0.05 −3.60 0.04 876.51 23.19 57 98 100 93 98 96 12.371 12.067 11.991
2M08511229+1146212 31.51 0.28 −10.93 0.05 −3.04 0.04 919.79 20.28 73 98 99 93 91 91 12.060 11.751 11.704
2M08511810+1142547 33.88 0.11 −10.96 0.05 −2.89 0.04 923.46 25.50 97 99 99 0 84 94 12.186 11.879 11.844
2M08512033+1145523 33.66 0.29 −10.89 0.06 −2.96 0.04 876.62 24.68 76 98 84 99 99 94 12.061 11.822 11.767
2M08512176+1144050 32.79 0.46 −11.28 0.05 −3.12 0.04 881.45 24.05 60 96 99 96 97 96 12.907 12.547 12.498
2M08512467+1143061 32.01 0.32 −10.88 0.07 −2.18 0.05 926.54 36.75 82 98 99 99 83 94 13.258 12.863 12.806
2M08513424+1145535 34.19 0.46 −10.83 0.07 −2.81 0.05 941.80 35.23 77 98 4 99 99 95 13.374 12.976 12.852

Note. Proper motions and distances from Gaia DR2.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2 3 4 5 6

In the top right and bottom right panels of Figure 1, we display the color–magnitude diagram (CMD) (JKS)0 versus H0 and (GBPGRP)0 versus G0 for the studied sample using 2MASS and Gaia DR2 photometry, respectively. We show all 563 stars observed in the M67 field by the APOGEE survey with orange dots. Our sample stars are shown as filled symbols, and the ones with S/N < 100 as empty symbols. We note that four early G and K dwarfs show a small offset compared to the adopted isochrones presented in the CMD diagrams of Figure 1, which could indicate nonmembership; however, we opt to use these stars because their RVs, proper motions, and distances suggest membership. The same symbol notation adopted by Souto et al. (2018) was used in this work, where diamonds correspond to main sequence, squares to turnoff stars, triangles for subgiants, and the circles represent the red giant stars, in blue for this work and red for Souto et al. (2018).

In Figure 2, we display a portion of the observed APOGEE spectra between 16150 and 16260 Å for the sample stars. From top to bottom, we plot the spectra of the red giant stars followed by the subgiant, turnoff, and main-sequence stars. The individual stellar spectra are very similar within a class, with rms differences at any given wavelength of about σ = 0.01. The largest star-to-star differences in Figure 2 are associated with CO, CN, and OH lines in the red giant spectra, suggestive of the changes produced by H burning in the stellar interior brought to the surface by the first dredge-up, as discussed in Section 5. Fe i and Ca i show the largest spread among G-type stars.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. Portion of the APOGEE observed spectra for the stellar sample. From top to bottom, we shown the spectra of red giant, subgiant, turnoff, and main-sequence stars.

Standard image High-resolution image

3. Stellar Parameters and Chemical Abundances

In this paper, we need to determine abundances in different classes of stars (dwarfs to red giants) homogeneously and precisely. One important factor in such analysis is the determination of the stellar parameters. It is known that the raw log g values derived using the ASPCAP pipeline contain systematic offsets for dwarfs (being systematically low) as well as red giant stars (being systematically high).

Figure 3 shows the effective temperature and surface gravity diagrams for our sample. The left panel shows the DR14 raw ASPCAP Teff and log g results. It is clear that the log g values derived by ASPCAP do not match the isochrones from Bressan et al. (2012) and Choi et al. (2016) (presented in the figure). Using such log g values in the analysis would introduce systematic uncertainties in the derived abundances. In the next section, we discuss the determination of the log g's and adopted Teff values in this study.

Figure 3.

Figure 3. Left panel: Teff–log g diagram showing the APOGEE DR14 raw ASPCAP results for the M67 members. Note the mismatch with the isochrones due to systematic uncertainties in the log g values derived by ASPCAP. Right panel: Teff–log g diagram showing the stellar parameters adopted in this study. The Teff values are the same raw values from ASPCAP DR14 shown in the left panel, but the surface gravities were derived from fundamental relations. The symbol notation is the same as in Figure 1.

Standard image High-resolution image

3.1. Effective Temperatures

We adopted the effective temperatures derived from ASPCAP DR14. We used the purely spectroscopic raw Teff values from ASPCAP (given in the FPARAM array in DR14). For comparison, we also determined photometric temperatures by adopting the calibration of González-Hernández & Bonifacio (2009) and using five different colors, BV, VJ, VH, VKs, and JKs, with an adopted cluster reddening of $E(B-V)$ = 0.041 mag (Sarajedini et al. 2009) and a metallicity of [Fe/H] = 0.00. González-Hernández & Bonifacio (2009) provide photometric calibrations for red giant and dwarf stars; we adopted the coefficients for giants for those stars with log g < 4.00 dex and for dwarfs for those stars with higher gravities. Good agreement between the photometric and the adopted raw ASPCAP Teff scales is obtained, where $\langle \delta ({T}_{\mathrm{eff}}(\mathrm{ASPCAP}-\mathrm{GHB})\rangle =-25\pm 106$ K. The effective temperatures obtained from the ASPCAP pipeline have an internal precision of ±50 K (Holtzman et al. 2015, García Pérez et al. 2016).

3.2. Surface Gravities

We determined surface gravities from the fundamental Equation (1), where the adopted Teff values are from the raw ASPCAP DR14 values, with stellar masses and bolometric magnitudes obtained from interpolation in the MIST isochrones (Choi et al. 2016; [Fe/H] = 0.00; age = 4.00 Gyr; $E(B-V)$ = 0.041; distance modulus (μ) = 9.60). The adopted solar values are log g = 4.438 dex, ${T}_{\mathrm{eff},\odot }=5772$ K, and ${M}_{\mathrm{bol},\odot }=4.75$, following the IAU recommendations in Prša et al. (2016):

Equation (1)

We adopted the surface gravities derived from Equation (1) in the abundance analysis in this study. The uncertainties in the determined surface gravities are similar to the ones reported in Souto et al. (2018), where σ = ±0.10 dex. The comparison between the derived log g values in this work with those from ASPCAP confirms the log g offset, where we obtain $\langle $δ(log g(Physical-ASPCAP)$\rangle $ = −0.18 ± 0.16 dex for red giants, −0.16 ± 0.11 dex for subgiants, −0.19 ± 0.07 dex for turnoff, and 0.17 ± 0.13 dex for main-sequence stars.

Figure 3 (right panel) shows the Teff–log g values adopted in this study. The effective temperatures for the studied stars are well spread out in the H-R diagram, with effective temperatures ranging between 4200 and 6250 K. The surface gravity values for the studied stars span a range in log g = 1.78–4.71.

3.3. Individual Abundance Analysis

In this work, we derive individual abundances for 15 elements: C, N, O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, and Ni. Individual abundances were determined with the qASPCAP code. The qASPCAP code basically corresponds to the ASPCAP pipeline, but for custom work, providing flexibility to change the analysis parameters. The methodology in the analysis is the same as adopted in ASPCAP, and the optimization is based on the FERRE code.

The procedure for determining individual abundances and microturbulent velocities with qASPCAP is similar to the one in ASPCAP. The ASPCAP pipeline (described in detail in García Pérez et al. 2016) uses a grid of synthetic spectra (Zamora et al. 2015) computed with the turbospectrum code (Alvarez & Plez 1998, Plez 2012) using KURUCZ model atmospheres (Castelli & Kurucz 2004, Mészáros et al. 2012) and the APOGEE DR14 line list, which is an updated version of the one published in Shetrone et al. (2015). The stellar parameters and chemical abundances are obtained by χ2 minimization with the FERRE code (Allende Prieto et al. 2006) controlled by an IDL wrapper (the qASPCAP in this work).

In a first phase, seven parameters are determined through a 7D optimization (Teff, log g, [M/H], [C/Fe], [N/Fe], [α/Fe], and ξ) using the entire wavelength range of the APOGEE spectra. During the second phase, individual abundances are obtained by repeating the fitting in predetermined windows that are sensitive to elemental abundances using the set of atmospheric parameters determined in the previous phase. It is possible to determine individual abundances for more than 26 elements from the APOGEE spectra; see Holtzman et al. (2018), Hasselquist et al. (2016, for Nd), and Cunha et al. (2017, for Ce). In this work, we adopt the same molecular and atomic lines as Souto et al. (2018) to derive individual abundances (see also Smith et al. 2013 and Souto et al. 2016). Even though Souto et al. (2018) reported Na and Cr abundances for main-sequence and turnoff stars, we opt in this work to not present these abundances (for these stellar classes) as the comparisons between the observed and synthesis were not satisfactory due to the weakness of the Na i and Cr i lines.

All M67 targets studied here have similar v sin (i), in the range 0 ≤ v sin (i) ≤ 7 km s−1. In fact, the threshold to detect the star's v sin (i) from APOGEE spectra is 7–8 km s−1. The effect of macroturbulence on the line profiles is similar to that of stellar rotation, and, as an approximation, qASPCAP treats rotation and macroturbulence as a single Gaussian profile.

The stellar parameters adopted in this work are shown in Table 2, with individual abundances presented in Table 3. The uncertainties in the derived abundances adopted in this work are the same as the ones reported in Table 4 of Souto et al. (2018). We note that, using ASPCAP calibrated abundances, the average $\langle \delta A(\mathrm{El})\rangle $ between the results derived in this work minus ASPCAP is smaller by 0.10 dex for all elements.

Table 2.  Stellar Parameters

2Mass ID Teff (K) Teff (K) Teff (K) log g (cm s−2) log g (cm s−2) log g (cm s−2) Mass (M) ξ (km s−1)
  ASPCAP raw ASPCAP calib GB09 ASPCAP raw ASPCAP calib Physical Mass isochrone ASPCAP raw
Red Giants                
2M08492491+1144057 4848.2 4893.5 4899.0 3.31 3.17 3.15 1.32 1.14
2M08503613+1143180 4973.6 5023.9 5019.9 3.53 3.41 3.51 1.31 1.24
2M08504964+1135089 4727.8 4774.7 4710.9 2.96 2.80 2.77 1.33 1.33
2M08511269+1152423 4758.1 4805.4 4702.4 2.83 2.49 2.50 1.33 1.45
2M08511704+1150464 4707.8 4757.9 4764.2 2.87 2.71 2.71 1.33 1.42
2M08511897+1158110 4907.5 4956.5 4909.9 3.35 3.22 3.30 1.32 1.11
2M08512156+1146061 4731.2 4776.9 4748.2 3.01 2.85 2.86 1.33 1.35
2M08512618+1153520 4750.6 4798.5 4714.2 2.81 2.48 2.49 1.33 1.40
2M08512898+1150330 4693.6 4741.1 4691.2 2.79 2.46 2.47 1.34 1.43
2M08512990+1147168 4247.5 4302.4 4274.0 1.95 1.68 1.82 1.34 1.47
2M08513577+1153347 4911.4 4959.5 4882.8 3.37 3.24 3.29 1.32 1.19
2M08513938+1151456 4878.3 4927.4 4871.1 3.32 3.20 3.22 1.32 1.20
2M08514234+1150076 4778.7 4825.8 4803.5 3.13 2.99 2.97 1.33 1.27
2M08514388+1156425 4747.5 4795.8 4711.9 2.76 2.44 2.50 1.33 1.64
2M08514507+1147459 4765.1 4812.5 4799.6 3.08 2.93 2.88 1.33 1.35
2M08514883+1156511 4976.0 5027.4 5028.8 3.56 3.44 3.57 1.31 1.25
2M08515611+1150147 4950.8 4994.9 4927.9 3.70 3.56 3.56 1.31 0.92
2M08515952+1155049 4740.0 4789.0 4708.4 2.76 2.45 2.49 1.33 1.51
2M08521097+1131491 4602.3 4649.1 4633.6 2.75 2.56 2.55 1.33 1.38
2M08521656+1119380 4345.3 4394.8 4406.8 2.32 2.09 2.08 1.35 1.39
2M08521856+1144263 4702.7 4750.1 4737.3 2.75 2.44 2.44 1.35 1.49
2M08522636+1141277 4912.3 4962.6 4957.1 3.39 3.26 3.37 1.31 1.30
2M08525625+1148539 4899.5 4944.1 4874.3 3.42 3.28 3.38 1.31 1.29
2M08534672+1123307 4850.6 4899.3 4880.3 3.23 3.11 3.05 1.32 1.10
2M08493465+1151256 4190.5 −9999.0 4347.6 1.62 −9999. 1.78 1.34 0.53
2M08505816+1152223 4983.5 5030.7 5021.5 3.59 3.46 3.46 1.31 1.05
2M08510723+1153019 4661.0 −9999.0 5335.0 3.44 −9999. 2.62 1.33 0.72
2M08510839+1147121 4901.4 4948.9 4995.6 3.40 3.27 3.22 1.32 1.25
2M08522003+1127362 4932.4 4980.3 4973.2 3.42 3.29 3.28 1.32 1.20
Subgiants                
2M08504994+1149127 5160.9 5213.0 5196.8 3.74 3.62 3.65 1.30 0.96
2M08510325+1145473 5884.4 5928.1 5932.2 4.17 −9999. 3.84 1.30 0.77
2M08511564+1150561 5282.5 5331.6 5271.0 3.81 −9999. 3.74 1.30 1.04
2M08511670+1145293 5280.6 5335.8 5312.0 3.86 −9999. 3.72 1.24 0.87
2M08512122+1145526 5926.6 5971.3 6019.4 4.21 −9999. 3.67 1.31 0.75
2M08512879+1151599 5617.4 5673.6 5624.3 3.91 −9999. 3.82 1.29 0.78
2M08512935+1145275 5019.9 5069.7 5061.7 3.61 3.49 3.60 1.31 1.16
2M08513540+1157564 5446.4 5497.9 5484.9 3.86 −9999. 3.74 1.29 0.65
2M08513862+1220141 5062.5 5112.0 4995.6 3.70 3.58 3.66 1.30 0.94
2M08514401+1146245 5432.7 5483.9 5507.6 3.85 −9999. 3.73 1.30 0.89
2M08514474+1146460 5058.6 5109.2 5065.6 3.69 3.57 3.64 1.30 0.97
2M08514994+1149311 6003.3 6048.3 5887.6 4.11 −9999. 3.85 1.28 0.83
2M08515335+1148208 6069.2 6114.7 5991.7 4.10 −9999. 3.89 1.27 1.06
2M08521134+1145380 5293.2 5343.2 5326.3 3.81 −9999. 3.71 1.30 0.92
2M08503667+1148553 5689.4 5746.5 5874.4 3.92 −9999. 3.82 1.29 0.68
2M08505569+1152146 5910.2 5954.9 5943.0 4.09 −9999. 3.85 1.28 0.67
2M08510106+1150108 5428.1 5480.6 5540.4 3.92 −9999. 3.78 1.29 0.82
2M08510951+1141449 5445.3 5492.3 5462.4 3.89 −9999. 3.77 1.29 0.84
2M08511877+1151186 5231.5 5277.7 5326.9 3.85 −9999. 3.73 1.30 0.81
2M08515567+1217573 5213.3 5264.6 5215.4 3.78 3.66 3.73 1.30 0.91
Turnoff                
2M08503392+1146272 6235.1 6279.1 6165.5 4.31 −9999. 4.02 1.25 0.73
2M08504079+1147462 6228.8 6274.8 6156.4 4.22 −9999. 3.97 1.25 0.72
2M08505177+1200247 6009.0 6053.3 6042.0 4.22 −9999. 4.15 1.21 0.62
2M08505702+1159158 6024.5 6069.9 6040.1 4.20 −9999. 4.03 1.27 0.55
2M08505762+1155147 6151.3 6196.3 6044.2 4.32 −9999. 4.16 1.21 0.64
2M08505903+1148576 5996.1 −9999.0 6090.9 4.25 −9999. 4.17 1.21 0.66
2M08505973+1139524 6061.8 6107.0 5968.9 4.34 −9999. 4.08 1.25 0.64
2M08510969+1159096 6026.4 6073.3 5957.1 4.18 −9999. 4.08 1.25 0.63
2M08511576+1152587 6093.1 6137.2 5960.3 4.18 −9999. 3.97 1.27 1.24
2M08512240+1151291 6009.8 6056.5 6056.2 4.20 −9999. 4.08 1.23 0.85
2M08513710+1154599 6110.2 6156.0 6052.5 4.29 −9999. 4.07 1.23 0.63
2M08513806+1201243 5882.2 5926.9 5845.0 4.16 −9999. 3.95 1.28 0.59
2M08514122+1154290 6118.1 6162.7 6008.6 4.19 −9999. 3.95 1.28 0.74
2M08514475+1145012 6040.5 6086.9 6136.3 4.36 −9999. 4.14 1.23 0.68
2M08520741+1150221 6043.8 6087.8 6057.0 4.29 −9999. 4.08 1.25 0.66
Main Sequence                
2M08502805+1154505 5759.3 5806.5 5755.8 4.17 −9999. 4.33 1.14 0.61
2M08511229+1154230 5848.9 5892.7 5885.6 4.35 −9999. 4.34 1.12 0.68
2M08512314+1154049 5802.4 5847.1 5886.3 4.27 −9999. 4.34 1.11 0.73
2M08512604+1149555 5310.1 5358.8 5472.1 4.08 −9999. 4.33 1.00 0.61
2M08512996+1151090 5900.8 5945.5 5925.8 4.34 −9999. 4.34 1.11 0.64
2M08513119+1153179 6062.9 6108.2 6021.5 4.30 −9999. 4.24 1.17 0.68
2M08513701+1136516 5201.7 5244.9 5211.6 4.52 −9999. 4.65 0.81 0.86
2M08514189+1149376 5481.9 5525.2 5595.9 4.31 −9999. 4.48 1.03 0.90
2M08514742+1147096 5199.1 5245.7 5226.8 4.24 −9999. 4.57 0.85 0.60
2M08521649+1147382 5467.4 5512.1 5573.0 4.33 −9999. 4.49 1.01 0.72
2M08505439+1156290 6163.0 6207.7 5956.9 4.29 −9999. 4.33 1.10 0.63
2M08510076+1153115 5564.3 5609.2 5798.0 4.25 −9999. 4.50 0.93 0.60
2M08511176+1150018 4857.4 4902.6 4779.6 4.20 −9999. 4.67 0.75 0.57
2M08512080+1145024 5799.6 5845.3 5998.8 4.28 −9999. 4.40 0.98 0.67
2M08512742+1153265 6169.5 6214.1 5998.8 4.31 −9999. 4.31 1.11 0.73
2M08512788+1155409 5834.3 5878.5 5860.8 4.30 −9999. 4.48 0.98 0.61
2M08513012+1143498 5866.0 5913.1 6036.4 4.36 −9999. 4.45 1.00 0.62
2M08513455+1149068 4922.6 4966.8 4908.2 4.45 −9999. 4.69 0.75 0.86
2M08521868+1143246 5960.3 6006.6 5970.8 4.19 −9999. 4.42 1.03 0.62
2M08512643+1143506 7985.2 −9999.0 7686.9 4.67 −9999. 4.53 1.21 1.55
2M08513259+1148520 7599.0 7647.2 7095.6 4.38 −9999. 4.44 1.21 2.82
Excluded sample due                
to low S/N (<100)                
Subgiant                
2M08503438+1139566 5955.8 5998.6 5947.6 4.11 −9999. 3.87 1.28 0.67
2M08504198+1136525 5597.0 5647.9 5611.6 3.92 −9999. 3.79 1.29 0.94
2M08510811+1201065 5625.6 5674.2 5679.9 4.02 −9999. 3.80 1.29 0.59
2M08511826+1150196 5458.1 5508.6 5454.3 4.01 −9999. 3.77 1.29 0.58
2M08520356+1141238 5954.6 6000.4 5984.7 4.07 −9999. 3.89 1.28 0.70
Main Sequence                
2M08502833+1142097 6164.8 6210.0 6060.1 4.28 −9999. 4.33 1.10 0.86
2M08503788+1252295 5362.5 5405.2 5381.2 4.39 −9999. 4.68 0.87 1.11
2M08505334+1143399 5194.7 5242.1 5536.2 4.22 −9999. 4.56 0.85 0.69
2M08505923+1146129 5567.1 5613.8 5943.0 4.21 −9999. 4.51 0.93 0.71
2M08512386+1138521 5614.1 5659.0 5789.1 4.47 −9999. 4.52 0.93 0.70
2M08513215+1136126 5935.4 5981.2 6132.1 4.33 −9999. 4.42 1.03 0.73
2M08513444+1137574 6000.8 6045.6 6003.4 4.24 −9999. 4.40 1.04 0.63
2M08514375+1145148 6056.9 6104.1 6127.2 4.30 −9999. 4.38 1.06 0.66
2M08514465+1141510 6091.1 6136.1 6031.7 4.39 −9999. 4.36 1.07 0.72
2M08515290+1146358 4624.6 4670.1 4633.9 4.34 −9999. 4.71 0.70 1.24
2M08521664+1142300 5985.2 6033.1 6122.4 4.28 −9999. 4.36 1.04 0.58
2M08504511+1136023 4547.0 4593.2 4640.2 4.17 −9999. 4.55 0.75 0.57
2M08510131+1141587 5904.2 5953.5 5906.2 4.24 −9999. 4.45 1.01 0.70
2M08510156+1147501 5642.9 5688.3 5749.4 4.17 −9999. 4.49 0.95 0.58
2M08511229+1146212 5806.2 5851.6 5856.3 4.25 −9999. 4.47 0.98 0.64
2M08511810+1142547 5895.8 5940.7 5920.0 4.27 −9999. 4.45 1.01 0.70
2M08512033+1145523 6063.8 6108.9 6146.6 4.32 −9999. 4.39 1.06 0.68
2M08512176+1144050 5360.8 5406.7 5624.3 4.26 −9999. 4.60 0.86 0.64
2M08512467+1143061 5219.1 5264.6 5446.2 4.39 −9999. 4.57 0.85 0.78
2M08513424+1145535 5193.5 5235.5 5174.0 4.62 −9999. 4.56 0.85 0.57

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

Table 3.  Stellar Abundances

2Mass ID [Fe/H] [C/H] [N/H] [O/H] [Na/H] [Mg/H] [Al/H] [Si/H] [K/H] [Ca/H] [Ti/H] [V/H] [Cr/H] [Mn/H] [Ni/H]
Red Giant                              
2M08492491+1144057 0.13 −0.20 0.35 0.09 0.33 0.17 0.42 0.24 0.03 0.14 0.22 0.20 0.01 0.08 0.11
2M08503613+1143180 0.02 −0.07 0.14 0.04 0.08 0.02 0.18 0.13 −0.04 −0.01 −0.07 0.19 −0.01 −0.03 0.02
2M08504964+1135089 0.07 −0.16 0.43 0.09 0.32 0.11 0.32 0.21 0.00 0.06 0.04 0.28 −0.04 0.07 0.07
2M08511269+1152423 0.07 −0.16 0.29 0.11 0.32 0.13 0.47 0.26 −0.01 0.10 0.12 0.17 −0.04 0.08 0.03
2M08511704+1150464 0.07 −0.20 0.48 0.13 0.28 0.13 0.27 0.21 −0.03 0.06 0.08 −0.00 0.01 0.03 0.05
2M08511897+1158110 0.06 −0.20 0.38 0.13 0.14 0.07 0.26 0.19 −0.04 0.05 −0.02 0.09 −0.01 0.05 0.06
2M08512156+1146061 0.10 −0.15 0.35 0.12 0.31 0.14 0.34 0.24 0.01 0.09 0.06 0.26 0.01 0.08 0.09
2M08512618+1153520 0.06 −0.19 0.33 0.10 0.37 0.11 0.41 0.25 −0.05 0.06 0.08 0.14 −0.08 0.05 0.02
2M08512898+1150330 0.04 −0.08 0.21 0.09 0.35 0.10 0.34 0.24 −0.04 0.06 0.01 0.12 −0.08 0.06 0.03
2M08512990+1147168 −0.05 −0.14 0.39 0.05 0.35 0.07 0.31 0.11 −0.15 −0.03 0.02 −0.02 −0.06 −0.07 −0.07
2M08513577+1153347 0.04 −0.13 0.24 0.09 0.12 0.05 0.24 0.15 −0.06 0.01 0.02 0.14 −0.04 0.02 0.04
2M08513938+1151456 0.06 −0.18 0.30 0.12 0.22 0.08 0.36 0.19 0.00 0.05 0.07 0.21 −0.05 0.03 0.03
2M08514234+1150076 0.12 −0.17 0.44 0.21 0.31 0.26 0.32 0.23 −0.03 0.15 0.13 −0.06 0.00 0.05 0.08
2M08514388+1156425 0.07 −0.18 0.30 0.11 0.29 0.13 0.41 0.27 −0.02 0.07 0.06 0.14 −0.04 0.07 0.02
2M08514507+1147459 0.07 −0.14 0.29 0.11 0.33 0.10 0.34 0.21 −0.01 0.07 0.04 0.24 −0.00 0.03 0.04
2M08514883+1156511 0.04 −0.15 0.18 0.14 0.19 0.04 0.25 0.18 −0.10 0.03 −0.04 0.14 −0.10 −0.02 0.04
2M08515611+1150147 0.15 −0.17 0.09 0.15 0.27 0.18 0.42 0.28 0.02 0.19 0.14 0.37 0.05 0.08 0.10
2M08515952+1155049 0.04 −0.17 0.31 0.07 0.26 0.08 0.39 0.23 −0.06 0.04 −0.01 0.16 −0.05 0.02 −0.00
2M08521097+1131491 0.10 −0.16 0.35 0.17 0.32 0.17 0.43 0.26 0.02 0.13 0.14 0.22 0.01 0.08 0.05
2M08521656+1119380 0.03 −0.19 0.27 0.12 0.37 0.14 0.43 0.22 −0.03 0.09 0.09 0.04 −0.07 0.04 −0.02
2M08521856+1144263 0.06 −0.23 0.39 0.12 0.39 0.14 0.35 0.23 −0.05 0.05 0.05 0.34 −0.04 0.07 0.05
2M08522636+1141277 0.05 −0.19 0.33 0.20 0.17 0.10 0.25 0.20 −0.04 0.04 0.10 0.14 −0.04 −0.04 0.06
2M08525625+1148539 0.16 −0.21 0.31 0.31 0.29 0.21 0.43 0.31 0.07 0.15 0.23 0.21 0.08 0.12 0.16
2M08534672+1123307 0.11 0.03 0.11 0.05 0.31 0.13 0.38 0.29 0.05 0.09 0.10 0.28 0.04 0.04 0.12
2M08493465+1151256 −1.14 −0.72 0.68 −1.00 −2.50 −0.98 −0.63 −1.54 −0.72 −0.92 −1.43 −1.63 −1.90 −0.10 −0.97
2M08505816+1152223 0.08 −0.05 −0.01 0.03 0.26 0.09 0.28 0.20 −0.02 0.11 0.05 0.18 −0.01 0.05 0.09
2M08510723+1153019 −1.71 −0.69 −0.26 −0.15 −1.36 −2.21 −1.77 −2.21 −1.23 −1.53 −2.21 −0.84 −0.89 −1.21 −1.36
2M08510839+1147121 0.07 −0.15 −0.08 0.26 0.16 0.09 0.27 0.21 −0.01 0.06 −0.03 0.30 0.01 0.04 0.06
2M08522003+1127362 0.09 −0.10 −0.07 0.27 0.28 0.13 0.30 0.22 −0.03 0.09 0.07 0.15 −0.01 0.04 0.09
Subgiant                              
2M08504994+1149127 −0.05 −0.02 0.20 −0.05 −0.07 −0.03 0.04 0.05 −0.09 −0.06 −0.10 −0.04 0.01 −0.11 −0.04
2M08510325+1145473 0.01 0.01 −0.02 0.07 −0.76 −0.25 −0.03 −0.02 −0.07 0.05 −0.04 −0.52 −2.35 −0.06 −0.01
2M08511564+1150561 0.04 −0.11 0.10 0.15 0.16 0.02 0.19 0.11 −0.00 0.00 −0.00 0.14 −0.07 0.02 0.07
2M08511670+1145293 0.01 −0.02 −0.00 0.04 0.24 −0.11 0.00 0.05 −0.05 0.02 0.03 −0.40 0.05 −0.02 −0.00
2M08512122+1145526 −0.05 −0.02 −0.05 0.02 −0.55 −0.24 −0.06 −0.11 −0.07 −0.06 −0.26 −0.36 −2.34 −0.10 −0.01
2M08512879+1151599 0.00 −0.04 −0.01 −0.02 0.29 −0.11 0.04 0.08 −0.19 −0.01 0.09 −0.02 −0.02 −0.13 −0.01
2M08512935+1145275 0.01 −0.14 0.16 0.08 0.24 0.00 0.12 0.12 −0.06 −0.01 −0.11 −0.14 −0.03 −0.02 0.01
2M08513540+1157564 0.01 −0.26 0.03 0.17 0.17 −0.08 0.11 0.03 −0.01 −0.06 −0.21 0.03 −0.07 −0.04 0.03
2M08513862+1220141 0.02 0.03 −0.03 0.09 0.17 0.01 0.13 0.08 −0.07 −0.04 −0.12 0.21 −0.03 0.01 0.06
2M08514401+1146245 0.07 0.01 0.15 −0.07 0.35 0.10 0.13 0.10 −0.03 −0.09 0.18 −0.39 0.01 0.05 0.05
2M08514474+1146460 −0.01 −0.17 0.14 0.11 0.19 −0.03 0.08 0.03 −0.09 −0.05 −0.12 0.09 −0.09 −0.02 0.03
2M08514994+1149311 −0.00 0.01 −0.01 0.12 −2.38 0.02 0.15 0.17 0.01 0.06 0.10 0.13 −2.25 −0.06 0.02
2M08515335+1148208 −0.06 −0.06 −0.07 0.05 −0.95 −0.04 0.10 0.07 −0.01 −0.01 0.06 0.04 −2.17 −0.12 −0.02
2M08521134+1145380 0.08 −0.07 0.29 0.03 0.39 0.10 0.07 0.12 −0.03 0.04 0.06 −0.29 −0.02 0.02 0.06
2M08503667+1148553 −0.07 −0.04 −0.06 −0.09 −1.34 −0.09 0.12 −0.02 0.05 0.01 0.03 −0.03 −2.38 −0.20 −0.07
2M08505569+1152146 0.01 0.02 −0.08 0.00 0.37 0.02 0.15 0.15 −0.03 0.01 −0.06 0.14 −0.26 −0.11 0.01
2M08510106+1150108 0.08 0.04 −0.08 0.34 0.15 0.08 0.16 0.18 −0.03 0.09 0.17 −0.04 0.08 0.04 0.06
2M08510951+1141449 0.15 0.07 −0.04 0.25 0.23 0.13 0.23 0.27 0.01 0.16 0.22 −0.15 0.18 0.15 0.15
2M08511877+1151186 0.09 −0.08 −0.01 −0.06 0.17 0.08 0.28 0.15 0.04 0.08 0.04 0.21 −0.02 0.04 0.11
2M08515567+1217573 0.04 −0.07 −0.07 0.14 −2.20 0.03 0.20 0.14 −0.10 0.05 −0.04 0.09 0.01 −0.01 0.06
Turnoff                              
2M08503392+1146272 0.01 0.01 −0.00 0.14 0.10 −0.05 −0.04 −0.31 0.01 −0.04 0.05
2M08504079+1147462 −0.05 −0.03 −0.04 0.07 0.13 −0.09 −0.03 0.22 −0.31 −0.18 −0.02
2M08505177+1200247 −0.03 −0.03 −0.22 −0.04 −0.10 −0.19 −0.09 −0.47 0.05 −0.09 −0.01
2M08505702+1159158 −0.08 −0.07 −0.26 −0.03 −0.13 0.03 −0.03 −0.06 −0.10 −0.14 −0.02
2M08505762+1155147 −0.02 −0.02 −0.08 0.04 0.06 −0.01 −0.05 −0.36 −0.10 −0.09 −0.00
2M08505903+1148576 −0.03 −0.02 −0.26 −0.10 −0.02 −0.03 −0.07 −0.53 0.03 −0.11 −0.05
2M08505973+1139524 −0.03 −0.02 −0.22 −0.08 0.01 −0.15 −0.02 −0.32 −0.35 −0.11 0.00
2M08510969+1159096 −0.11 −0.12 −0.34 −0.15 −0.15 −0.10 −0.09 −0.20 −0.28 −0.19 −0.12
2M08511576+1152587 −0.02 −0.00 −0.18 0.13 −0.04 0.06 0.02 0.01 −0.04 −0.05 0.04
2M08512240+1151291 −0.12 −0.11 −0.28 −0.18 −0.17 −0.06 −0.16 −0.22 0.03 −0.16 −0.05
2M08513710+1154599 −0.01 −0.07 −0.15 −0.03 0.05 −0.10 0.11 −0.11 −0.15 −0.10 0.06
2M08513806+1201243 −0.01 −0.04 −0.25 −0.10 −0.06 −0.02 0.11 −0.28 −0.05 −0.12 0.04
2M08514122+1154290 −0.04 −0.03 −0.22 −0.01 −0.06 −0.01 −0.05 −0.49 0.04 −0.12 −0.00
2M08514475+1145012 −0.10 −0.08 −0.32 −0.19 −0.11 −0.04 −0.14 −0.14 0.26 −0.13 −0.06
2M08520741+1150221 −0.00 −0.01 −0.13 0.05 0.02 −0.12 0.02 −0.36 −0.10 −0.03 0.02
Main Sequence                              
2M08502805+1154505 0.02 −0.00 −0.10 0.02 −0.08 −0.03 0.06 0.12 −0.12 −0.06 −0.03
2M08511229+1154230 0.04 0.01 −0.08 0.01 0.03 0.06 0.06 −0.00 0.06 −0.04 0.05
2M08512314+1154049 0.00 −0.04 −0.17 −0.08 −0.01 −0.01 0.05 −0.49 0.04 −0.12 0.01
2M08512604+1149555 −0.02 −0.13 −0.05 0.15 −0.08 −0.01 0.03 0.03 0.02 −0.12 −0.02
2M08512996+1151090 −0.01 −0.03 −0.14 −0.04 −0.00 0.01 0.04 −0.07 0.03 −0.05 0.03
2M08513119+1153179 −0.03 −0.03 −0.19 −0.10 −0.04 −0.07 −0.06 −0.19 0.04 −0.07 −0.01
2M08513701+1136516 0.03 0.06 0.03 0.02 0.04 −0.01 0.01 0.12 0.15 0.03 0.07
2M08514189+1149376 0.06 0.02 −0.10 −0.09 0.12 −0.05 0.14 −0.11 0.07 0.02 0.11
2M08514742+1147096 0.05 −0.03 0.00 0.03 0.01 −0.00 0.02 0.01 0.08 0.03 0.03
2M08521649+1147382 0.02 −0.04 −0.15 −0.06 0.07 −0.03 0.05 −0.33 0.13 −0.01 0.07
2M08505439+1156290 −0.04 −0.02 −0.21 −0.01 −0.08 −0.11 −0.08 −0.11 −0.04 −0.10 0.04
2M08510076+1153115 0.02 −0.02 −0.13 0.10 0.04 −0.02 −0.03 −0.08 0.11 −0.05 0.05
2M08511176+1150018 0.03 −0.01 −0.32 −0.10 0.04 −0.09 0.12 −0.07 0.10 −0.05 0.04
2M08512080+1145024 −0.03 −0.03 −0.21 −0.12 −0.02 −0.24 0.03 −0.20 −0.84 −0.13 −0.04
2M08512742+1153265 −0.04 −0.03 −0.15 0.01 −0.03 −0.01 −0.01 −0.04 −0.02 −0.07 0.02
2M08512788+1155409 −0.03 −0.02 −0.20 −0.01 −0.11 0.02 0.01 −0.09 0.04 −0.07 0.09
2M08513012+1143498 −0.07 −0.06 −0.28 −0.19 −0.06 −0.25 −0.05 −0.56 −0.75 −0.17 −0.07
2M08513455+1149068 0.06 0.02 −0.12 0.01 0.09 −0.01 0.13 0.05 0.06 −0.01 0.09
2M08521868+1143246 −0.08 −0.05 −0.35 −0.14 −0.07 −0.08 −0.10 −0.17 0.21 −0.21 −0.10
2M08512643+1143506 −0.21 −0.67 −0.16 −1.56 0.26 0.13 0.58 −0.66 −2.11 0.54 0.04
2M08513259+1148520 −0.18 −0.15 −0.17 −0.46 0.02 −0.60 −0.61 −0.55 −0.61 −0.19 −0.15
Excluded sample due                              
to low S/N (<100)                              
Subgiant                              
2M08503438+1139566 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.09 0.72 0.03 0.24 0.25 −0.05 0.20 0.16 −0.08 −0.25 −0.08 0.08
2M08504198+1136525 0.11 0.03 0.07 0.03 0.33 0.08 0.11 0.34 0.02 0.26 0.24 −0.04 0.00 −0.01 0.12
2M08510811+1201065 −0.07 −0.13 −0.12 −0.32 −0.13 0.36 0.03 −0.09 0.18 0.29 −0.26 −0.18 −0.05
2M08511826+1150196 −0.17 −0.21 −0.20 −0.39 −0.29 0.07 −0.12 −0.15 −0.03 −0.12 −0.24 −0.30 −0.21
2M08520356+1141238 −0.04 −0.02 −0.05 0.01 −0.56 0.04 0.08 0.11 0.05 −0.01 0.20 0.09 −0.22 −0.27 0.01
Main Sequence                              
2M08502833+1142097 0.01 −0.02 −0.20 −0.05 0.16 0.05 0.05 0.27 −0.05 0.05 0.09
2M08503788+1252295 0.07 0.04 −0.18 −0.05 0.08 −0.03 0.12 −0.06 0.07 −0.01 0.14
2M08505334+1143399 −0.10 −0.13 −0.60 −0.11 −0.07 −0.36 0.04 −0.41 −0.50 −0.18 −0.05
2M08505923+1146129 −0.10 −0.11 −0.43 −0.47 −0.18 −0.18 −0.07 −0.14 −0.85 −0.10 −0.04
2M08512386+1138521 −0.04 −0.07 −0.25 −0.14 −0.09 −0.10 −0.10 −0.47 0.07 −0.10 0.02
2M08513215+1136126 −0.05 −0.03 −0.20 −0.16 −0.14 −0.06 −0.32 0.48 −2.50 0.04 0.01
2M08513444+1137574 0.02 0.02 −0.28 −0.10 0.01 −0.24 0.05 0.35 0.75 −0.04 −0.02
2M08514375+1145148 −0.04 −0.08 −0.22 −0.17 −0.02 0.06 −0.05 0.21 0.41 0.00 0.00
2M08514465+1141510 −0.02 0.02 −0.19 −0.19 0.03 −0.07 0.03 0.17 0.43 −0.16 −0.00
2M08515290+1146358 0.12 0.02 −0.15 −0.11 0.25 −0.05 0.22 0.23 0.38 0.02 0.07
2M08521664+1142300 −0.15 −0.10 −0.31 −0.16 −0.13 0.22 −0.16 0.04 0.29 −0.29 −0.09
2M08504511+1136023 0.05 −0.08 −0.34 −0.34 0.12 0.04 0.03 −0.13 −0.27 −0.08 −0.15
2M08510131+1141587 −0.17 −0.19 −0.42 −0.23 −0.13 −0.39 −0.11 −0.43 −0.36 −0.23 −0.10
2M08510156+1147501 −0.09 −0.06 −0.42 −0.08 −0.25 −0.10 −0.06 −0.07 −0.54 −0.17 −0.00
2M08511229+1146212 −0.05 −0.02 −0.29 −0.08 −0.12 −0.14 0.05 −0.03 −0.40 −0.04 0.01
2M08511810+1142547 −0.02 0.01 −0.22 −0.09 −0.06 −0.14 −0.03 −0.32 −0.82 −0.07 −0.01
2M08512033+1145523 −0.03 −0.01 −0.21 −0.06 −0.01 −0.22 0.01 0.03 −0.32 −0.05 −0.03
2M08512176+1144050 −0.05 −0.06 −0.48 −0.12 −0.10 −0.10 0.09 −0.07 −0.10 −0.10 −0.09
2M08512467+1143061 0.03 0.01 −0.47 −0.05 0.13 −0.34 0.11 −0.38 0.21 −0.16 −0.07
2M08513424+1145535 0.06 0.03 −0.03 0.10 0.04 −0.01 0.13 0.08 0.14 0.02 0.09

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2 3

4. Results

The individual abundances reported in this work display an elevated scatter (standard deviation of the mean), in particular for nitrogen (∼0.14 dex), aluminum (∼0.16 dex), and the alpha elements (∼0.15 dex). The potassium abundances are the ones showing the smallest scatter, with σ = 0.07 dex. Such significant scatter in M67 stars was also noticed by Bertran de Lis et al. (2016) studying [O/Fe] in M67 stars with APOGEE and comparing it with the spread in other clusters. However, when we analyze the stars by class (main sequence, turnoff, subgiant, red giant), the scatter in the derived elemental abundance is drastically reduced to 0.03–0.04 dex for most of the elements. As our sample covers a wide range in surface gravity, 1.78 ≤ log g ≤ 4.71, it is possible that the observed scatter is the signature of a physical process modifying the stellar atmospheric abundances, such as atomic diffusion as proposed by Souto et al. (2018). In the following sections, we discuss in detail the abundance trends as a function of the stellar parameters.

4.1. Abundance Variations across the H-R Diagram in M67 Stars

We split our sample into four different classes based on the stars' evolutionary stage. We selected as main-sequence stars those with log g ≥ 4.20, turnoff stars those with surface gravity 3.90 < log g < 4.20, subgiants those having 3.60 ≤ log g ≤ 3.90, and red giant stars those with log g < 3.60. (We note that the cut in surface gravity is similar to the one in color and magnitude, as can be seen in the right panel of Figure 1.)

Probing the level of homogeneity in open clusters is important to understanding their formation and for evaluating the possibility of performing chemical tagging in stellar populations. Chemical homogeneity in open clusters (as well as in globular clusters) is a critical assumption to understand changes in the abundances across evolutionary stages. Bovy (2016) and Price-Jones & Bovy (2018), using APOGEE spectra, found tight constraints on the chemical homogeneity of M67 using a sample of red giant stars. Bovy (2016) analyzed 24 red giant stars in M67, finding one-dimensional sequences with a spread in the elemental initial cluster abundances lower than 0.03 dex (2σ of uncertainty) for all elements studied in this work. It is worth noting that the Bovy (2016) results were derived in a way that is insensitive to the effects of atomic diffusion, mixing, and other physical processes that may modify the stellar surface abundances.

One straightforward way to evaluate if samples of stars have similar abundances is to apply a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (K-S test). The K-S test is usually invoked to find out if two samples are drawn from the same distribution. We perform a study of chemical homogeneity of M67 stars using the derived abundances through a K-S test, and we apply it to the same classes, for example, red giants × red giants. To be able to compare the derived abundances for the same classes using the K-S test, we randomly split each group into two samples and then we apply the K-S test. To ensure we do not choose a random split that favors homogeneity, for each group, we have run the test in 1000 random splits. This result shows that the abundances of each stellar class are indistinguishable, with the derived median p value >0.50 for all elements in the four stellar classes. This is a complementary result to Bovy (2016), finding chemical homogeneity of M67 stars in the same evolutionary stage based on the stellar abundances derived in this work.

We also applied the K-S test using the derived abundances for the 15 studied elements comparing stars in the different groups: G dwarf main sequence (MS) × red giant, G dwarf (MS) × subgiant, G dwarf (MS) × turnoff, red giant × subgiant, red giant × turnoff, and subgiant × turnoff stars.

In Figure 4 we present the results of the K-S two-sided test comparing the individual abundances for each stellar class. The vertical axis represents the [X/H] derived here, and the horizontal axis represents the subgroups being compared. Each cell shows the p value of the K-S test and is colored as shown in the side color bar. We designed the color scale to give a blue color if the samples are clearly distinct, a yellow color if the p value is near 0.05, and a red color if we cannot reject the null hypothesis, that is, the samples are not distinguishable. Note that we have applied a false discovery rate (Benjamini & Hochberg 1995) correction in order to account for the fact that we are performing many hypothesis tests simultaneously, and spurious rejections of the null hypothesis are therefore expected. Regardless of the threshold that we use, we obtain outstanding segregation for red giant and turnoff stars based on their abundances. The K abundance is the one with higher p values (>0.03) for all scenarios. On the other hand, the two classes most difficult to separate based on their abundances are the main-sequence and the turnoff stars. The abundances of Mg, Ca, V, and Fe are the best ones to distinguish between these classes. The Mg abundances show significant differences among all stellar classes (with p values <0.10 for all comparisons).

Figure 4.

Figure 4. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for the different elements (y axis) on the different stellar classes (x axis). The obtained p value is color coded from blue to red. The red colors are saturated at 0.1.

Standard image High-resolution image

4.1.1. As a Function of Stellar Parameters

In Figure 5 we display the derived individual abundances as a function of surface gravity for the 15 elements studied. We use the same symbol notation as in Figure 1, but with open symbols instead of filled. We also show the line-by-line manual abundance results from Souto et al. (2018), our control sample. Atomic diffusion models computed for this work (see Section 6) are overplotted for each element (C and N including mixing processes). We note that the diffusion models for Na and Mg abundances were slightly shifted in order to better fit the observed abundances.

Figure 5.

Figure 5. Chemical abundances for the studied stars are shown as a function of log g. The symbol notation is similar to Figure 1 (open symbols instead of filled symbols). The diffusion models calculated in this work are shown as solid black lines.

Standard image High-resolution image

From visual inspection—and in agreement with the results from the K-S test—we can organize the element variations as a function of surface gravity (as well as Teff and M) into three groups of elements: (1) C and N, with abundances displaying a different behavior for the evolved subgiant and red giant stars (as a consequence of dredge-up mechanisms); (2) O, Na, and Cr as their abundances are not reliable for the main-sequence and turnoff stars because their spectral lines become too weak; (3) the elements showing a dip, either sinuous or small, in the elemental abundance close to log g = 4.00 dex (Fe, Mg, Al, Si, K, Ca, Ti, V, Mn, and Ni). The derived abundances of Mg, Al, and Si present the most significant changes between the stellar classes (excluding N), where the red giant abundances are 0.10 to 0.20 dex higher than those from the subgiants.

In Figure 6, we present the abundance results as a function of Teff in M67 stars, with diffusion models also shown. Overall, the behavior seen in Figure 6 indicates an abundance increase (in the range 0.00–0.40 dex) as Teff decreases from 6000 to 4000 K. The elements showing a smooth increase or decrease in abundance as functions of Teff are Fe, Ca, and Mn. The elements most sensitive to Teff, Na, Mg, Al, and Si, show a monotonic increase in their individual abundances. Similar to the trends with log g, C shows a particular behavior, and the abundance variation of N shows a maximum value around Teff ∼ 4700 K and then decreases for higher and lower values of Teff. The elements presenting the least sensitivity to Teff are K, Cr, and Ni. Ti and V show the most significant abundance scatter in the analysis as a function of both log g and Teff.

Figure 6.

Figure 6. Same as Figure 5, except shown as a function of Teff.

Standard image High-resolution image

Souto et al. (2018) showed that atomic diffusion processes can explain the abundance variations of M67 stars across the different evolutionary stages. However, other physical processes are also relevant in the context of abundance variations, where the most significant sources of deviations, not precisely in order, are non-LTE effects, 1D or 3D treatment of the model atmosphere, stellar rotation (v sin i), mixing process (e.g., first dredge-up), and atomic diffusion processes. In the following sections, we discuss the impact of these possible deviations in our results.

5. Possible Explanations for the Abundance Trends

Figures 5 and 6 show significant abundance variations as a function of the stellar parameters (log g and Teff). Such abundance trends are not expected to occur in open clusters—due to the homogeneity of the stars formed by the same material—unless some additional effect or mechanism is playing a role in the stellar atmosphere, or in the abundance determination itself.

5.1. Non-LTE Deviations in the Near Infrared

Deviations from the LTE have been studied mostly at optical wavelengths, where strong deviations are found to occur in metal-poor, evolved red giant stars (Asplund 2005; Asplund et al. 2009). In the near infrared (NIR), in particular in the H band, the works of Cunha et al. (2015) and Zhang et al. (2016, 2017) have investigated non-LTE effects in Na i, Mg i, and Si i lines in the APOGEE spectra, finding deviations from non-LTE in these elements to be usually smaller than 0.05 dex (see also the discussion in Souto et al. 2018). Using the results from Bergemann & Gehren (2008) and Bergemann et al. (2012a, 2013, 2015) compiled from a Maria Bergemann website (nlte.mpia.de), we created a grid of non-LTE deviations for five elements: Fe, Mg, Si, Ti, and Mn. The deviations were estimated for each stellar class, assuming a solar metallicity and Teff = 4700 K, log g = 2.40, and ξ = 1.60 km s−1 for red giants; Teff = 5400 K, log g = 3.70, and ξ = 1.25 km s−1 for subgiants; Teff = 6100 K, log g = 3.90, and ξ = 1.15 km s−1 for turnoff stars; and Teff = 5850 K, log g = 4.40, and ξ = 1.00 km s−1 for main-sequence stars. We adopted 1D plane-parallel models computed with MAFAGS-OS for all stellar classes. In Table 4 we summarize the average non-LTE correction for each stellar class and element.

Table 4.  Non-LTE Corrections

Stellar Class Mg Si Ti Mn Fe
Main sequence +0.003 −0.011 +0.096 +0.113 +0.003
Turnoff +0.008 −0.025 +0.113 +0.155 +0.005
Subgiant −0.004 −0.016 +0.091 +0.146 +0.003
Red giant −0.025 −0.032 +0.070 +0.301 +0.003

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

In Figure 7 we show the non-LTE corrected abundances for the five elements studied (Fe, Mg, Si, Ti, and Mn). The top panel displays the abundance differences from [X/H]non-LTE–[X/H]LTE, and in the bottom panel we show a plot similar to Figure 5, but now using the [X/H]non-LTE.

Figure 7.

Figure 7. Top panel: log g vs. [X/H] (corrected-derived) individual abundances from non-LTE deviation. Bottom panel: log g vs. [X/H] corrected from non-LTE deviations. In both panels, the symbols follow the same notation as Figure 5.

Standard image High-resolution image

The iron abundances do not show significant non-LTE deviations, as seen in Table 4, where δ(non-LTE–LTE) are smaller than 0.01 dex for all stellar classes. For Mg and Si, the deviation is very similar for main-sequence stars, both positive, being almost null for Mg. For subgiant and red giant stars, we obtain small, negative non-LTE corrections. The deviations for Ti and Mn are more significant in this study. For Ti, the deviations are positive for the stellar classes studied here, with the major deviation observed in turnoff stars (δ(non-LTE–LTE) = 0.11 dex). When applying non-LTE corrections, we do not see a strong change in the abundance versus log g diagram, when compared to the LTE one presented in Figure 5. The abundances of Ti are shifted in all classes, resulting in a higher scatter as a function of log g. The Mn corrections show the most significant differences, δ(non-LTE–LTE) ∼ 0.13 dex for main sequence, turnoff, and subgiants, and δ(non-LTE–LTE) ∼ 0.30 dex for red giants. The inclusion of non-LTE corrections in the analysis does not erase the observed abundance trends in the different stellar classes.

5.2. 1D or 3D Model Atmospheres

Stellar atmospheres are 3D and time-dependent; however, by convenience, we usually treat model atmospheres as having 1D plane-parallel or spherical geometry in hydrostatic equilibrium. This approximation simplifies the analysis, but can lead to systematic errors in the derived quantities (atmospheric parameters or chemical abundances).

The use of a 1D treatment of the stellar atmosphere requires the inclusion of "ad hoc" parameters to account for velocities that broaden the profiles at microscopic (microturbulence) and macroscopic (macroturbulence) levels. A precise determination of the microturbulence parameter minimizes the deviations from the results obtained with 3D models.

As in non-LTE studies, 3D effects are also transition dependent, and analyses for NIR H-band transitions have been limited. The studies of Asplund (2005), Asplund et al. (2009), and Caffau et al. (2011) have summarized various effects and corrections for elemental abundances using optical spectra as a reference. In this section, we will summarize these effects for solar-metallicity stars to verify whether the abundance trends discussed in Section 4 could be explained by 3D effects.

Caffau et al. (2011) determined solar abundances from a 3D non-LTE analysis using the CO5BOLD code, providing 3D abundance corrections for several elements. For Fe, Caffau et al. (2011) find 3D corrections to be about 0.03 dex using the solar spectrum. The C abundance reported by Caffau et al. (2011) has a −0.02 dex 3D correction, while for K the authors obtain a correction of 0.07 dex. From Caffau et al. (2009), the solar N abundance is reported to have a 3D correction smaller than 0.01 dex.

The previous work by Bergemann et al. (2012b) studied the 3D deviations for stars in different evolutionary stages at different metallicities. They find 3D effects in the iron abundance for the Sun to be very small: 3D corrections ∼0.01 dex. More recently, Bergemann et al. (2017) studied the Mg abundances in the Sun and found 3D corrections to be ∼0.02 dex. Amarsi & Asplund (2017) studied non-LTE 3D Si abundances in the Sun and found corrections to be lower than 0.01 dex. Amarsi et al. (2016), analyzing the O i forbidden line at 630 nm, find 3D corrections to the O abundance to be between 0.05 and 0.20 dex, negative in the Sun and reaching higher values for turnoff stars.

All 3D corrections discussed above are smaller than 0.05 dex (except for K), which is at the limit of the measurement uncertainties of this work. Given the small 3D corrections found for main-sequence stars, as well as the lack of studies in the literature for turnoff, subgiants, and red giant stars at solar metallicity, we conclude that deviations from 3D modeling are not enough to explain the abundance trends observed in this work.

5.3. Stellar Rotation

The study of the relation between stellar rotation and abundance variations in late-type stars is often motivated by the investigation of lithium depletion. Several authors have found correlations between stellar rotation and the lithium abundance depletion, such as Balachandran (1990, 1995), King et al. (2000), da Silva et al. (2009), Canto Martins et al. (2011), and Delgado Mena et al. (2014). None of the spectra analyzed in this study exhibit measurable rotational broadening (v sin(i)) above the limits set by the APOGEE spectral resolution of ∼7–8 km s−1.

6. Discussion

The abundance results obtained for M67 stars show evidence that both mixing and atomic diffusion are operating, so stellar evolution models that include diffusion will be compared to the observationally derived abundances.

6.1. Stellar Evolution Models

We computed our mixing and atomic diffusion models using solar models (solar metallicity and solar age 4 Gyr) to calibrate the degree of gravitational settling precisely (using the surface solar He as a proxy); this gives a predicted reduction in the efficiency of the settling of 15%, or an effective coefficient of 0.85. The methodology adopted in the modeling of mixing and atomic diffusion is described in detail in Bahcall et al. (2001) and Delahaye & Pinsonneault (2006). We note that, overall, our models agree with the ones from MIST (Choi et al. 2016, Dotter et al. 2017); however, our models cover all of the species studied in this work, while the MIST models are not available for Al, K, V, Cr, Mn, and Ni.

6.2. Mixing Processes: First Dredge-up

When a low-mass star, such as a ∼1.2M M67 star that is currently evolving off of the main sequence and across the subgiant branch, reaches the base of the RGB, the outer convective envelope reaches its largest extent in mass. At this point in the H-R diagram (where Teff ∼ 5000 K and log g ∼ 3.5 in M67), the base of the convective envelope ingests material that has been exposed previously to H burning via the CN cycle. As a consequence of CN-cycle H burning, this nuclear-processed material contains an enhanced abundance of 14N and a decreased abundance of 12C. The convective envelope will carry this mixture to the surface, resulting in a lower surface abundance of 12C and a larger abundance of 14N for stars evolving onto the RGB; this phase of stellar evolution is referred to as first dredge-up, or FDU (Iben 1965; for a more recent overview of the various red giant dredge-up episodes, see Karakas & Lattanzio 2014). In the case of dredge-up in M67 red giants, the 14N abundance is predicted to be enhanced by roughly ∼+0.30 to +0.40 dex, while the 12C abundance is predicted to be depleted by ∼−0.10 to −0.20 dex. The magnitudes of the abundance changes in C and N are a function of red giant mass (Iben 1965), with larger-mass stars having deeper convective envelopes that dredge up more nuclear-processed material, resulting in larger 14N enhancements and larger 12C depletions, producing lower C/N ratios.

The expected relationship between red giant mass and C/N ratio has been exploited by a number of recent studies using APOGEE data and results (e.g., Martig et al. 2016; Ness et al. 2016; see also D. Feuillet et al. 2019, in preparation) to produce age–mass relations as a function of red giant [C/N] abundances, while Masseron & Gilmore (2015) have analyzed [C/N] to study the possible formation of the thin and thick disk.

In addition to standard convection in 1D, other physical processes can modify the interior abundance profiles in stars as they evolve from the main sequence, across the subgiant branch, and onto the RGB, with two important processes being rotation and the inversion of the mean molecular weight gradient in a small region outside the H-burning shell created by 3He burning via 3He(3He, 2p)α (Eggleton et al. 2006; Charbonnel & Zahn 2007); this last process is referred to as thermohaline mixing. The inclusion of rotation-induced mixing and thermohaline mixing produces larger carbon depletions and larger nitrogen enhancements as a result of FDU. In this section, we use 12C and 14N abundances derived here to compare with predictions from various models of first dredge-up mixing.

As shown in Figure 8, the M67 red giants display clear evidence of the first dredge-up through the behavior of the C and N abundances as functions of both Teff and log g (which map the position of a star along the subgiant and RGB); observed APOGEE abundances are plotted as the various symbols, while models are plotted as the continuous lines and are models from this study, along with those from Lagarde et al. (2012). The left panels of Figure 8 plot the [C/N] values versus Teff (top, (a)) and log g (bottom, (b)), with the [C/N] values decreasing rapidly at Teff ∼ 5000 K and log g ∼ 3.5, right at the base of the RGB as predicted by FDU. The right panels plot the individual abundances of 12C (as [C/H]) and 14N (as [N/H]) versus log g. Carbon and nitrogen abundance differences between red giants on the RGB relative to those in the RC were found to agree with results from Tautvaišiene et al. (2000) and Masseron et al. (2017), who found slightly lower values of C/N in RC stars compared to those on the RGB. Our values for M67 stars are $\langle $12C/14N${\rangle }_{\mathrm{RGB}}=1.86$ and $\langle $12C/14N${\rangle }_{\mathrm{RC}}=1.40$, excluding the two evolved stars with log g < 2.1 dex, which places them on the upper RGB or possibly in an early-AGB phase of evolution.

Figure 8.

Figure 8. Panels (a) and (b) show Teff vs. [C/N] and log g vs. [C/N], respectively. Panels (c) and (d) present the [C/H]–log g and [N/H]–log g diagrams. We display the mixing models from this work (solid black curve) and from Lagarde et al. (2012, dashed black curve) as a comparison. All symbols follow the same notation as Figure 5, with the inclusion of filled circles for the red clump stars.

Standard image High-resolution image

Figure 8 also highlights differences in the C and N abundance variations predicted from mixing models when compared to those abundances derived in this study. In the left panels of Figure 8 (a) and (b), we show the [C/N] ratio as a function of Teff and log g, respectively, and we note that the overall observational results follow the model predictions, although the observed [C/N] values are systematically lower. Such a difference can be a consequence of an overestimated nitrogen abundance in our analysis (as pointed out by Bertelli Motta et al. 2017 using ASPCAP data), due to a subestimated log g. In the right panels of Figure 8, we present the [C/H] (panel (c)) and [N/H] (panel (d)) abundances as a function of log g. For nitrogen, the abundances are in agreement with the models; however, the observational carbon abundances differ from the models by ∼−0.15 dex. We conclude that the abundance variations observed for 12C and 14N in the subgiant and red giant stars can be explained well by FDU mixing models. The mixing models here (as well as from Lagarde et al. 2012) predict changes for the other elemental abundances to be smaller than 0.01 dex as the star evolves. Therefore, mixing models cannot explain their abundance variations.

6.3. Atomic Diffusion

Atomic diffusion is a likely explanation for most of the observed abundance variations across the H-R diagram in M67, thus adding members of this old open cluster to those stars in which diffusion has been observed. Evidence of diffusion in the Sun is found both in its surface helium abundance, which is lower than the initial value, and in the solar sound speed profile being best fit by models that include diffusion (Bahcall et al. 1995; Chaboyer et al. 1995a). Lithium abundances settle at a rate similar to He, and the flatness of the Spite Li plateau is likely set by diffusion (Chaboyer et al. 1992). The diffusion signature can be altered or erased by mixing, for example, mixing driven by rotation and dredge-up (see Section 6.2), thus complicating the detection and interpretation of diffusion patterns. Such mixing processes are likely at work in the Sun, which has a smoother composition profile than that predicted by diffusion alone, with the magnitude of diffusion being overestimated by about 25%. This is also confirmed by looking at A-type stars: if they rotate fast enough, they are not chemically peculiar (Michaud 1970, see also Michaud et al. 2015). The interplay between diffusion creating abundance signatures that various mixing processes can then modify means that there are not necessarily firm theoretical predictions about the amplitude of the diffusion signature and its mass or metallicity dependence. Reasonably well-motivated trends can be expected, though, and Chaboyer et al. (1995b, 1995c), Choi et al. (2016), Dotter (2016), and Dotter et al. (2017) have approximated limits on how efficient diffusion can be in thin surface convective zones.

A few previous studies have probed atomic diffusion in cluster stars, with most of them focused on low-metallicity globular clusters: Korn et al. (2007), Lind et al. (2008), and Nordlander et al. (2012). The latter analyzed stars belonging to the globular cluster NGC 6397, with a metallicity [Fe/H] = −2.00 and age 13.5 Gyr, with their sample containing stars from the turnoff point (TOP) up to the RGB. The abundances of Li, Mg, Ca, Ti, Cr, and Fe in those studies were derived from high-resolution optical spectroscopy, and they found that changes in the stellar abundances for different evolutionary phases are in good agreement with predictions from diffusion models from the literature; see Richard et al. (2002, 2005). In particular, Nordlander et al. (2012) found abundance differences of 0.06 and 0.18 dex between TOP and RGB stars in NGC 6397, with the largest difference for Mg, and which is a much smaller variation than we see in M67, for example for Mg or Al. Of course, the chemical abundance of NGC 6397 is rather distinct from that of M67.

Önehag et al. (2014) found some evidence of atomic diffusion operating in M67. This was later supported by the abundance results in Blanco-Cuaresma et al. (2015). As previously mentioned, abundance differences of up to ∼0.20 dex between the turnoff and red giant stars were observed by Souto et al. (2018) for the elements O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, Ca, V, Mn, and Fe. A comparison of the results in Souto et al. (2018) with the diffusion patterns from the models by Choi et al. (2016) and Dotter et al. (2017) indicated good agreement. In addition, Bertelli Motta et al. (2018) found >0.15 dex abundance differences from main-sequence to red giant stars for the elements Al, Si, Mn, and Ni. Gao et al. (2018) found a good match between the abundance variations for Al and Si with diffusion models.

6.4. Atomic Diffusion in M67 Stars

We find significant abundance differences (up to ∼0.50 dex) for most of the studied species between main-sequence, turnoff, subgiant, and red giant stars in M67. Using the K-S test (Figure 4), we obtained clear evidence of abundance differences between stars in different evolutionary stages in M67. In addition, we showed (Section 4) that the abundances of stars belonging to the same evolutionary class are indistinguishable.

In Figure 9 we present the mass–Δ[X/H] ([X/H]Current–[X/H]Initial) diagram for the 12 studied elements. Similar diagrams with abundances as a function of surface gravity and effective temperature are presented in Figures 5 and 6. In all three figures, we show the atomic diffusion models computed in this work as solid black lines and the MIST models as brown dashed lines. The pristine Fe abundance in the models is assumed to be the mean Fe abundance for the red giants, which is used as the fiducial point (i.e., δ[Fe/H] = 0.00) for the initial cluster value. We note that all other abundance ratios are assumed to be solar, that is, [X/Fe] = 0.00. The abundance variations across the H-R diagram indicate that atomic diffusion is operating in most of the studied elements. The models for all of the elements display similar trends driven by atomic diffusion, except for C and N, which include mixing signatures.

Figure 9.

Figure 9. Diagram of the stellar mass as a function of Δ[X/H], where Δ[X/H] indicates the derived metallicity from the stellar photosphere minus the initial cluster composition. The black and brown lines show the atomic diffusion models from this work and MIST, respectively. All symbols follow the same notation as Figure 5.

Standard image High-resolution image

The complex trend observed in the carbon abundances is a consequence of diffusion operating in the main-sequence and turnoff stars (smaller convective envelopes), and mixing at the first dredge-up being responsible for the carbon abundance variation in subgiant and red giant stars (Section 6.2; Figure 8). These results suggest that atomic diffusion dominates over mixing in the main-sequence and turnoff stars, while mixing processes control the abundance changes in subgiant and red giant stars.

The nitrogen abundance variation can be explained as a signature of first dredge-up (Section 6.2). For oxygen, the scattered abundance results for red giant and subgiant stars, combined with the lack of results for main-sequence and turnoff stars, impedes detection of signatures of diffusion. Due to the weakness of CN and OH molecular lines in the APOGEE spectra of main-sequence and turnoff stars, it is not possible to derive N and O abundances in such stars.

The comparison of the abundance patterns for all elements with the model predictions indicates an overall good match between the atomic diffusion models and the derived abundances across the H-R diagram. However, the derived abundances exhibit a more significant dip across the main-sequence—turnoff stars when compared to what is expected from the atomic diffusion models, in particular for Mg, Al, Ti, and Mn.

For Al, Mg, Si, and to a lesser degree V, the relative dip across the main-sequence—turnoff stars is more significant because the red giant abundances are higher than those predicted by the models. (The Na abundances of red giants are also higher than the models, but there are no abundances for turnoff and main-sequence stars.) On the one hand, for Ti and Mn, the dip is more considerable because the abundances of turnoff and main-sequence stars are lower. As discussed in Section 5 (Figure 7), non-LTE corrections for Mg and Si (as well as Fe) would reduce the abundance dip by a factor of ∼0.03 dex, while for Ti, the dip would be reduced by roughly 0.05 dex. The non-LTE corrections for Mn, on the other hand, would systematically change the red giant abundances and increase the abundance difference between turnoff and red giant stars by ∼0.14 dex, which would worsen the comparison with the models.

7. Summary

Given its combination of age and metallicity in addition to the numerous detailed studies in the literature, M67 remains a prime cluster to test for physical and chemical processes in stellar spectroscopy that are not yet well understood.

In this paper, we present individual abundances of 15 elements (C, N, O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, and Ni) derived from a 1D LTE analysis of 83 stars in M67. The abundances were obtained via χ2 minimization of the high-resolution SDSS-IV/APOGEE spectra with the qASPCAP code. The stellar sample is composed of stars in different evolutionary stages (19 main sequence, 15 turnoff, 20 subgiant, and 29 red giants) with the aim to quantify abundance trends across the different stellar evolutionary phases (Önehag et al. 2014; Bertelli Motta et al. 2018; Gao et al. 2018; Souto et al. 2018).

We obtain significant abundance differences (of up to 0.30–0.40 dex) as a function of stellar parameters (Teff, log g, and mass) that map the different stellar evolutionary classes. Studying the abundance variations within the same stellar classes, we find a much lower scatter, of about ∼0.05–0.10 dex. Using the K-S test, it is found that the abundances within each stellar class are indistinguishable; while performing the test for the different classes, we obtain clear segregations for the red giant and turnoff stars in most of the elements analyzed.

We compiled non-LTE corrections for Fe, Mg, Al, Si, and Mn, finding them to be small for all elements (<0.10 dex), except for Mn, which had corrections between 0.15 and 0.30 dex in all stellar classes analyzed. With the use of non-LTE corrections to our derived abundances, we still observe clear abundance trends across the H-R diagram.

We found that mixing models explain well the abundance variations of C and N for subgiants and red giant stars. We see atomic diffusion operating in the C abundances in stars from the main-sequence–TOP. The atomic diffusion models computed in this work (as well as from the literature) predict reasonably well the remaining abundance patterns for the stars at different evolutionary stages studied in this work, and therefore we conclude that atomic diffusion operates in M67 more efficiently in the turnoff stars and in most of the elements (C, Mg, Al, Si, K, Ca, Ti, V, Mn, Fe, and Ni) analyzed in this work.

We thank the anonymous referee for useful comments that helped improve the paper. D.S. thanks Pascal Petit for the cordial hosting at CNRS-Toulouse, where part of this project was developed. K.C. and V.S. acknowledge that their work here is supported, in part, by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under Grant 16-XRP16_2-0004, issued through the Astrophysics Division of the Science Mission Directorate. D.A.G.H. and O.Z. acknowledge support from the State Research Agency (AEI) of the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (MCIU) and the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) under grant AYA2017-88254-P. H.J. acknowledges support from the Crafoord Foundation, Stiftelsen Olle Engkvist Byggmästare, and Ruth och Nils-Erik Stenbäcks stiftelse.

Funding for the Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, and the Participating Institutions. SDSS-IV acknowledges support and resources from the Center for High-Performance Computing at the University of Utah. The SDSS website is www.sdss.org.

SDSS-IV is managed by the Astrophysical Research consortium for the Participating Institutions of the SDSS Collaboration including the Brazilian Participation Group, the Carnegie Institution for Science, Carnegie Mellon University, the Chilean Participation Group, the French Participation Group, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, The Johns Hopkins University, Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (IPMU)/University of Tokyo, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Leibniz Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP), Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie (MPIA Heidelberg), Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik (MPA Garching), Max-Planck-Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik (MPE), National Astronomical Observatory of China, New Mexico State University, New York University, University of Notre Dame, Observatório Nacional/MCTI, The Ohio State University, Pennsylvania State University, Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, United Kingdom Participation Group, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, University of Arizona, University of Colorado Boulder, University of Oxford, University of Portsmouth, University of Utah, University of Virginia, University of Washington, University of Wisconsin, Vanderbilt University, and Yale University.

Footnotes

Please wait… references are loading.
10.3847/1538-4357/ab0b43