The following article is Free article

Erratum: "GASP .IV. A Muse View of Extreme Ram-pressure Stripping in the Plane of the Sky: The Case of Jellyfish Galaxy JO204" (2017, ApJ, 846, 27)

, , , , , , , , , , , , and

Published 2018 February 5 • © 2018. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Marco Gullieuszik et al 2018 ApJ 853 199 DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa9bd

Download Article PDF
DownloadArticle ePub

You need an eReader or compatible software to experience the benefits of the ePub3 file format.

This is a correction for 2017 ApJ 846 27

Article metrics

515 Total downloads

Share this article

Author e-mails

marco.gullieuszik@oapd.inaf.it

Author affiliations

1 INAF, Astronomical Observatory of Padova, vicolo dell'Osservatorio 5, I-35122 Padova, Italy; marco.gullieuszik@oapd.inaf.it

2 Instituto de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica, IRyA, UNAM, Campus Morelia, A.P. 3-72, C.P. 58089, Mexico

3 European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Córdova 3107, Santiago, Chile

4 Institute of Astro- and Particle Physics, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstrasse 25, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria

5 School of Physics, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia

6 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Padova, Vicolo Osservatorio 3, I-35122 Padova, Italy

7 INAF, Astronomical Observatory of Trieste, via G.B. Tiepolo 11, I-34131 Trieste, Italy

ORCID iDs

Dates

  1. Received 2018 January 18
  2. Accepted 2018 January 20
  3. Published

Check for updates using Crossmark

Journal RSS
Create or edit your corridor alerts

What are corridors?opens in new tab

0004-637X/853/2/199

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Previous article in issue
Next article in issue

We found a bug in the procedure we used to calculate the metallicity and ionization parameter that leads to estimates of both quantities that are smaller than the correct values. However, the main results and conclusions of the paper are neither based on the absolute value of the metallicity nor the ionization parameter; consequently, we do not need to amend any section of the paper. We just update Figures 1 and 2 (Figures 10 and 11 in the original paper) with the corrected values.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Figure 10 in the original paper. Metallicity (left panel) and ionization parameter (right panel) map. Regions ionized by LINERs/AGNs according to the BPT diagram have been masked (gray area). Contours are stellar isophotes, just as in Figure 4 in Gullieuszik et al. (2017).

Download figure:

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 2.

Figure 2. Figure 11 in the original paper. The upper left panel shows the 111 Hα knots detected in JO204. The location of each knot in the Baldwin–Phillips–Terlevich diagram is shown in the upper right panel (the color-coding and lines are the same as in Figure 9 in Gullieuszik et al. 2017) and it is used to derive the ionization mechanism; results are shown in the lower left panel. The metallicity of the 92 star-forming regions is shown in the lower right panel.

Download figure:

Standard image High-resolution image
Please wait… references are loading.
10.3847/1538-4357/aaa9bd