Abstract
Big Bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) theory predicts the abundances of the light elements D, 3He, 4He, and 7Li produced in the early universe. The primordial abundances of D and 4He inferred from observational data are in good agreement with predictions, however, BBN theory overestimates the primordial 7Li abundance by about a factor of three. This is the so-called "cosmological lithium problem." Solutions to this problem using conventional astrophysics and nuclear physics have not been successful over the past few decades, probably indicating the presence of new physics during the era of BBN. We have investigated the impact on BBN predictions of adopting a generalized distribution to describe the velocities of nucleons in the framework of Tsallis non-extensive statistics. This generalized velocity distribution is characterized by a parameter q, and reduces to the usually assumed Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution for q = 1. We find excellent agreement between predicted and observed primordial abundances of D, 4He, and 7Li for 1.069 ≤ q ≤ 1.082, suggesting a possible new solution to the cosmological lithium problem.
Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS
1. INTRODUCTION
First proposed in 1946 by George Gamow (Gamow 1946), the hot Big Bang theory is now the most widely accepted cosmological model of the universe, where the universe expanded from a very high density state dominated by radiation. The theory has been vindicated by the observation of the cosmic microwave background (Penzias & Wilson 1965; Hinshaw et al. 2013), our emerging knowledge of the large-scale structure of the universe, and the rough consistency between calculations and observations of primordial abundances of the lightest elements in nature: hydrogen, helium, and lithium. Primordial Big Bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) began when the universe was 3 minutes old and ended less than half an hour later when nuclear reactions were quenched by the low temperature and density conditions in the expanding universe. Only the lightest nuclides (2H, 3He, 4He, and 7Li) were synthesized in appreciable quantities through BBN, and these relics provide us a unique window on the early universe. The primordial abundances of 2H (referred to as D hereafter) and 4He inferred from observational data are in good general agreement with predictions; however, BBN theory overestimates the primordial 7Li abundance by about a factor of three (Cyburt et al. 2003; Coc et al. 2004; Asplund et al. 2006; Sbordone et al. 2010). This is the so-called "cosmological lithium problem." Attempts to resolve this discrepancy using conventional nuclear physics have been unsuccessful over the past few decades (Angulo et al. 2005; Cyburt et al. 2008; Boyd et al. 2010; Kirsebom & Davids 2011; Scholl et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2011; Coc et al. 2012; Voronchev et al. 2012; Hammache et al. 2013; Pizzone et al. 2014; Famiano et al. 2016), although nuclear physics solutions altering the reaction flow into and out of mass-7 are still being proposed (Cyburt & Pospelov 2012; Chakraborty et al. 2011). The dire potential impact of this longstanding issue on our understanding of the early universe has prompted the introduction of various exotic scenarios involving, for example, the introduction of new particles and interactions beyond the Standard Model (Pospelov & Pradler 2010; Kang et al. 2012; Coc et al. 2013; Kusakabe et al. 2014; Yamazaki et al. 2014; Goudelis et al. 2016). On the observational side, there are attempts to improve our understanding of lithium depletion mechanisms operative in stellar models (Vauclair & Charbonnel 1998; Pinsonneault et al. 1999, 2002; Richard et al. 2005; Korn et al. 2006). This remains an important goal but is not our focus here. For recent reviews on BBN and the primordial lithium problem, please read articles written by Fields (2011) and Cyburt et al. (2016).
In this work we suggest one solution to the lithium problem that arises in a straightforward, simple manner from a modification of the velocity distributions of nuclei during the era of BBN. In the BBN model, the predominant nuclear-physics inputs are thermonuclear reaction rates (derived from cross sections). In the past decades, great efforts have been undertaken to determine these data with high accuracy (e.g., see compilations of Wagoner 1969; Caughlan & Fowler 1988; Smith et al. 1993; Angulo et al. 1999; Descouvemont et al. 2004; Serpico et al. 2004; Xu et al. 2013). A key assumption in all thermonuclear rate determinations is that the velocities of nuclei may be described by the classical Maxwell–Boltzmann (MB) distribution (Rolfs & Rodney 1988; Iliadis 2007). The MB distribution was derived for describing the thermodynamic equilibrium properties of an ideal gas, and was verified by a high-resolution experiment at a temperature of ~900 K about 60 years ago (Miller & Kusch 1955). However, it is worth asking: do nuclei still obey the classical MB distribution in the extremely complex, fast-expanding, Big Bang hot plasma? Indeed, Clayton et al. (1975) adopted a similar approach when addressing the solar neutrino problem prior to the unambiguous measurement of neutrino flavor change by Ahmad et al. (2001).
Whatever the source of the distortions from MB, one expects that the distribution should still maximize entropy. Hence, to account for modifications to the classical MB velocity distribution, one may use Tsallis statistics (also referred to as non-extensive statistics; Tsallis 1988), which is based on the concept of generalized non-extensive entropy. The associated generalized velocity distribution is characterized by a parameter q and reduces to the MB distribution for q = 1. Tsallis statistics has been applied in a host of different fields, including physics, astronomy, biology, and economics (Gell-Mann & Tsallis 2004).
2. THERMONUCLEAR REACTION RATE
It is well-known that thermonuclear rate for a typical
reaction is usually calculated by folding the cross section σ(E)12 with an MB distribution (Rolfs & Rodney 1988; Iliadis 2007)

with k the Boltzmann constant, and μ12 the reduced mass of particles 1 and 2. In Tsallis statistics, the velocity distribution of particles can be expressed by (Tsallis 1988)

where Bq denotes the q-dependent normalization constant. With this velocity distribution, the non-extensive thermonuclear rate (Iliadis 2007) for a typical
reaction, where both reactants and products are nuclei, can be calculated by

with Emax =
for q > 1 and
for 0 < q < 1. Here, the q < 0 case is excluded according to the maximum-entropy principle (Tsallis 1988; Gell-Mann & Tsallis 2004). Usually, one defines the
reaction with positive Q value as the forward reaction and the corresponding
reaction with negative Q value as the reverse one. Under the assumption of classical statistics, the ratio between reverse and forward rates is simply proportional to exp
(Iliadis 2007). With Tsallis statistics, however, the reverse rate is expressed as

where c =
. All parameters in Equations (1)–(3) are well-defined in Iliadis (2007). For a reaction
, we assume the photons obey the Planck radiation law (Iliadis 2007; Torres et al. 1997, 1998) and use the approximation of
(Mathews et al. 2011) when calculating the corresponding reverse rate.
3. IMPACT OF NON-EXTENSIVE STATISTICS ON BBN
A previous attempt to examine the impact of deviations from the MB distribution on BBN (Bertulani et al. 2013) only used non-extensive statistics for forward rates and did not consider the impact on reverse rates. Here, we have for the first time used a non-extensive velocity distribution to determine thermonuclear reaction rates of primary importance to BBN in a consistent manner. With these non-extensive rates, the primordial abundances are predicted by a standard BBN code by adopting the up-to-date cosmological parameter η = (6.203 ± 0.137) ×10−10 (Hinshaw et al. 2013) for the baryon-to-photon ratio, and the neutron lifetime of τn = (880.3 ± 1.1) s (Olive et al. 2014). The reaction network involves 30 reactions with nuclei of A ≤ 9 (see Table 1) in total. Here, the thermonuclear (forward and reverse) rates for those 17 principal reactions (with bold face in Table 1) have been determined in the present work using non-extensive statistics, with 11 reactions of primary importance (Smith et al. 1993) and 6 of secondary importance (Serpico et al. 2004) in the primordial light-element nucleosynthesis. Standard MB rates have been adopted for the remaining reactions, as they play only a minor role during BBN. Our code gives results in good agreement with previous BBN predictions (Coc et al. 2012; Bertulani et al. 2013; Cyburt et al. 2016) if q = 1, as seen in Table 2.
Table 1. Nuclear Reactions Involved in the Present BBN Network
| Reaction | Ratio | Reaction | Ratio |
| 1H(n, γ)2H (Hara et al. 2003) | 1.02 | 2H(n, γ)3H (Wagoner 1969) | 1.09 |
| 2H(p, γ)3He (Descouvemont et al. 2004) | 0.81 | 3He(n, γ)4He (Wagoner 1969) | 1.10 |
| 2H(d, n)3He (Descouvemont et al. 2004) | 1.12 | 3He(3He,2p)4He (Caughlan & Fowler 1988) | 1.54 |
| 2H(d, p)3H (Descouvemont et al. 2004) | 0.91 | 24He(n, γ)9Be (Caughlan & Fowler 1988) | 0.62 |
| 3H(d, n)4He (Descouvemont et al. 2004) | 1.02 | 6Li(p, γ)7Be (Xu et al. 2013; He et al. 2013) | 0.59 |
| 3H(α, γ)7Li (Descouvemont et al. 2004) | 0.60 | 6Li(n, γ)7Li (Malaney & Fowler 1989) | 0.47 |
| 3He(n, p)3H (Descouvemont et al. 2004) | 1.11 | 6Li(n,α)3H (Caughlan & Fowler 1988) | 0.47 |
| 3He(d, p)4He (Descouvemont et al. 2004) | 0.84 | 7Li(n, γ)8Li (Wagoner 1969) | 1.06 |
| 3He(α, γ)7Be (Descouvemont et al. 2004) | 0.37 | 8Li(n, γ)9Li (Li et al. 2005) | 1.06 |
| 7Li(p, α)4He (Descouvemont et al. 2004) | 0.61 | 8Li(p, n)24He (Wagoner 1969) | 1.07 |
| 7Be(n, p)7Li (Descouvemont et al. 2004) | 0.39 | 9Li(p, α)6He (Thomas et al. 1993) | 1.07 |
| 3H(p, γ)4He (Dubovichenko 2009) | 0.69 | 9Be(p, α)6Li (Caughlan & Fowler 1988) | 1.01 |
| 2H(α, γ)6Li (Angulo et al. 1999; Xu et al. 2013; Anders et al. 2014) | 0.43 | 9Be(p, d)24He (Caughlan & Fowler 1988) | 0.97 |
| 6Li(p, α)3He (Angulo et al. 1999; Xu et al. 2013) | 0.36 | ||
| 7Be(n, α)4He (King et al. 1977) | 0.35 | ||
| 7Li(d, n)24He (Caughlan & Fowler 1988) | 0.53 | ||
| 7Be(d, p)24He (Caughlan & Fowler 1988; Parker 1972) | 0.11 |
Note. The non-extensive Tsallis distribution is implemented for the 17 principal reactions shown in bold face. The listed flux ratio is the time-integrated reaction flux calculated with the non-extensive Tsallis distribution (with q = 1.0755) relative to that with the classical MB distribution (q = 1). References are listed for each reaction in parentheses.
Download table as: ASCIITypeset image
Table 2. The Predicted Abundances for the BBN Primordial Light Elementsa
| Nuclide | Coc et al. (2012) | Cyburt et al. (2016) | Bertulani et al. (2013) | This work | Observation | |
| (q = 1) | (q = 1) | (q = 1) | q = 1 | q = 1.069 ~ 1.082 | ||
| 4He | 0.2476 | 0.2470 | 0.249 | 0.247 | 0.2469 | 0.2561 ± 0.0108 (Aver et al. 2010) |
| D/H(×10−5) | 2.59 | 2.58 | 2.62 | 2.57 | 3.14 ~ 3.25 | 3.02 ± 0.23 (Olive et al. 2012) |
| 3He/H(×10−5) | 1.04 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 1.04 | 1.46 ~ 1.50 | 1.1 ± 0.2 (Bania et al. 2002) |
| 7Li/H(×10−10) | 5.24 | 4.65 | 4.39 | 5.23 | 1.62 ~ 1.90 | 1.58 ± 0.31 (Sbordone et al. 2010) |
(a)The observational data are listed for comparison.
Download table as: ASCIITypeset image
It shows that the predicted and observed abundances (Aver et al. 2010; Sbordone et al. 2010; Olive et al. 2012) of D, 4He, and 7Li are in agreement (within 1σ uncertainty of observed data) when a non-extensive velocity distribution with 1.069 ≤ q ≤ 1.082 is adopted, as shown in Figure 1 and Table 2. As the reliability of primordial 3He observations is still under debate (Coc et al. 2012), we do not include this species in the figure. In this calculation, the predicted 3He abundance for the above range of q agrees at the 1.8σ level with an abundance of 3He/H = 1.1(2) (Bania et al. 2002) observed in our Galaxy's interstellar medium. Thus, we have found a possible new solution to the cosmological lithium problem without introducing any exotic theory. Figure 2 illustrates the level of deviation from the MB energy distribution implied by q = 1.069 and 1.082 at 1 GK.
Figure 1. Predicted primordial abundances as a function of parameter q (in red solid lines). The observed primordial abundances (Aver et al. 2010; Sbordone et al. 2010; Olive et al. 2012) with 1σ uncertainty for D, 4He, and 7Li are indicated as hatched horizontal bands. The vertical (blue) band constrains the range of the parameter q to 1.069 ≤ q ≤ 1.082. Note that the "abundance" of 4He exactly refers to its mass fraction.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution image Export PowerPoint slideFigure 2. Normalized relative probabilities for non-extensive energy distributions and for the standard MB distribution (q = 1) at a temperature of 1 GK. The enlarged insert plot shows the tails, which are cut off at Emax = kT/(q − 1) for the non-extensive distributions.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution image Export PowerPoint slideThe agreement of our predicted 7Li abundance with observations can be attributed to the reduced production of 7Li and radioactive 7Be (which decays to 7Li) when q > 1. Production of these species is dominated by the radiative capture reactions 3H(α ,γ)7Li and 3He(α, γ)7Be, respectively. The forward alpha-capture rates of these reactions decrease for q > 1 due to the decreased availability of high energy baryons relative to the MB (q = 1) distribution (see Figure 2). On the other hand, the reverse photodisintegration rates are independent of q due to our adoption of Planck's radiation law for the energy density of photons. As a result, the net production of 7Li and 7Be decreases, giving rise to concordance between predicted and observed primordial abundances. Figure 3 shows the time and temperature evolution of the primordial abundances during BBN calculated with the MB and the non-extensive distributions (with average value of q allowed, q = 1.0755). It can be seen that the predicted 7Be (ultimately decaying to 7Li) abundance with q = 1.0755 is reduced significantly relative to that with q = 1, and ultimately the 7Li problem can be solved in this model.
Figure 3. Time and temperature evolution of primordial light-element abundances during the BBN era. The solid and dotted lines indicate the results for the classical MB distribution (q = 1) and the non-extensive distribution (q = 1.0755), respectively.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution image Export PowerPoint slideThe time-integrated reaction fluxes are calculated within the frameworks of classical MB and non-extensive distributions, respectively. Figure 4 displays the reaction network for the most important reactions that occur during BBN with a non-extensive parameter of q = 1.0755, where the reaction fluxes are scaled by the thickness of the solid lines. It demonstrates, in particular, that for q within our allowed range, the fluxes of the main reactions responsible for the net production of 7Be (such as 3He(α, γ)7Be and 7Be(n, p)7Li) are reduced by about 60% relative to fluxes determined using q = 1. Thus, it results in an ultimately smaller predicted 7Li abundance, which is consistent with observations. The corresponding flux ratios are listed in Table 1.
Figure 4. Time-integrated fluxes for primary reactions involved in BBN, as calculated using a non-extensive velocity distribution with q = 1.0755.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution image Export PowerPoint slideOne can rationalize the above modified statistics based upon the following arguments. Since the nuclear reactions that lead to the production of 7Li and 7Be occur during the end of BBN, they are falling out of equilibrium and must be evolved via the Boltzmann equations. In general, the Boltzmann equations become a coupled set of partial-integral differential equations for the phase-space distributions and scattering of all species present. Here, we can reduce our consideration to the evolution of the distribution functions of the A = 3, 4 species contributing to the formation of A = 7 isotopes. For these species there are two competing processes. On the one hand the nuclear reaction cross sections favor the reactions among the most energetic 3He, 3H, and 4He nuclei which would tend to diminish slightly the distributions in the highest energies. At the same time however, the much more frequent scattering of these nuclei off of ambient electrons and (to a lesser extent) photons will tend to restore the distributions to equilibrium. The competition between these two processes, plus the fact that the distributions of 3He, 3H are Fermi–Dirac will lead to a slight deviation from standard MB statistics.
4. CONCLUSION
We have studied the impact on BBN predictions of adopting a generalized distribution to describe the velocities of nucleons in the framework of Tsallis non-extensive statistics. By introducing a non-extensive parameter q, we find excellent agreement between predicted and observed primordial abundances of D, 4He, and 7Li in the region of 1.069 ≤ q ≤ 1.082 (q = 1 indicating the classical MB distribution), which might suggest a possible new solution to the cosmological lithium problem. We encourage studies to examine sources for departures from classical thermodynamics during the BBN era so as to assess the viability of this mechanism. Furthermore, the implications of non-extensive statistics in other astrophysical environments should be explored as this may offer new insight into stellar nucleosynthesis.
This work was financially supported by the the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11490562, 11675229), and the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (2016YFA0400503). A.P. was partially supported by the Spanish MICINN under Grant No. AYA2013-42762. C.B. acknowledges support under U.S. DOE Grant DDE-FG02-08ER41533, U.S. NSF grant PHY-1415656, and the NSF CUSTIPEN grant DE-FG02-13ER42025.
References
- Ahmad Q. R., Allen R. C., Andersen T. C. et al 2001 PhRvL 87 071301
- Anders M., Trezzi D., Menegazzo R. et al 2014 PhRvL 113 042501
- Angulo C., Arnould M., Rayet M. et al 1999 NuPhA 656 3
- Angulo C., Casarejos E., Couder M. et al 2005 ApJL 630 L105
- Asplund M., Lambert D. L., Nissen P. E., Primas F. and Smith V. V. 2006 ApJ 644 229
- Aver E., Olive K. A. and Skillman E. D. 2010 JCAP 5 003
- Bania T. M., Rood R. T. and Balser D. S. 2002 Natur 415 54
- Bertulani C. A., Fuqua J. and Hussein M. S. 2013 ApJ 767 67
- Boyd R. N., Brune C. R., Fuller G. M. and Smith C. J. 2010 PhRvD 82 105005
- Caughlan G. R. and Fowler W. A. 1988 ADNDT 40 283
- Chakraborty N., Fields B. D. and Olive K. A. 2011 PhRvD 83 063006
- Clayton D. D., Dwek E., Newman M. J. and Talbot R. J., Jr. 1975 ApJ 199 494
- Coc A., Goriely S., Xu Y., Saimpert M. and Vangioni E. 2012 ApJ 744 158
- Coc A., Uzan J. P. and Vangioni E. 2013 PhRvD 87 123530
- Coc A., Vangioni-Flam E., Descouvemont P., Adahchour A. and Angulo C. 2004 ApJ 600 544
- Cyburt R. H., Fields B. D. and Olive K. A. 2003 PhLB 567 227
- Cyburt R. H., Fields B. D. and Olive K. A. 2008 JCAP 11 012
- Cyburt R. H., Fields B. D., Olive K. A. and Yeh T. H. 2016 RvMP 88 015004
- Cyburt R. H. and Pospelov M. 2012 IJMPE 21 1250004
- Descouvemont P., Adahchour A., Angulo C., Coc A. and Vangioni-Flam E. 2004 ADNDT 88 203
- Dubovichenko S. B. 2009 RuPhJ 52 294
- Famiano M. A., Balantekin A. B. and Kajino T. 2016 PhRvC 93 045804
- Fields B. D. 2011 ARNPS 61 47
- Gamow G. 1946 PhRv 70 572
- Gell-Mann M. and Tsallis C. 2004 Nonextensive Entropy: Interdisciplinary Applications (New York: Oxford Univ. Press)
- Goudelis A., Pospelov M. and Pradler J. 2016 PhRvL 116 211303
- Hammache F., Coc A. and de Séréville N. 2013 PhRvC 88 062802(R)
- Hara K. Y., Utsunomiya H., Goko S. et al 2003 PhRvD 68 072001
- He J. J., Chen S. Z., Rolfs C. E. et al 2013 PhLB 725 287
- Hinshaw G., Larson D., Komatsu E. et al 2013 ApJS 208 19
- Iliadis C. 2007 Nuclear Physics of Stars (Weinheim: Wiley)
- Kang M. M., Hu Y., Hu H. B. and Zhu S. H. 2012 JCAP 05 011
- King C. H., Austin S. M., Rossner H. H. and Chien W. S. 1977 PhRvC 16 1712
- Kirsebom O. S. and Davids B. 2011 PhRvC 84 058801
- Korn A. J., Grundahl F., Richard O. et al 2006 Natur 442 657
- Kusakabe M., Kim K. S., Cheoun M. K. et al 2014 ApJS 214 5
- Li Z. H., Liu W. P., Bai X. X. et al 2005 PhRvC 71 052801
- Malaney R. A. and Fowler W. A. 1989 ApJL 345 L5
- Mathews G. J., Pehlivan Y., Kajino T., Balantekin A. B. and Kusakabe M. 2011 ApJ 727 10
- Miller R. C. and Kusch P. 1955 PhRv 99 1314
- Olive K. A. et al 2014 ChPhC 38 090001 (Particle Data Group),
- Olive K. A., Petitjean P., Vangioni E. and Silk J. 2012 MNRAS 426 1427
- Parker P. D. 1972 ApJ 175 261
- Penzias A. A. and Wilson R. W. 1965 ApJ 142 419
- Pinsonneault M. H., Steigman G., Walker T. P. and Narayananm V. K. 2002 ApJ 574 398
- Pinsonneault M. H., Walker T. P., Steigman G. and Narayanan V. K. 1999 ApJ 527 180
- Pizzone R. G., Spartá R., Bertulani C. A. et al 2014 ApJ 786 112
- Pospelov M. and Pradler J. 2010 ARNPS 60 539
- Richard O., Michaud G. and Richer J. 2005 ApJ 619 538
- Rolfs C. E. and Rodney W. S. 1988 Cauldrons in the Cosmos (Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press)
- Serpico P. D., Esposito S., Iocco F. et al 2004 JCAP 12 010
- Sbordone L., Bonifacio P. and Caffau E. 2010 A&A 522 A26
- Scholl C., Fujita Y., Adachi T. et al 2011 PhRvC 84 014308
- Smith M. S., Kawano L. H. and Malaney R. A. 1993 ApJS 85 219
- Thomas T., Schramm D. N., Olive K. A. and Fields B. D. 1993 ApJ 406 569
- Torres D. F., Vucetich H. and Plastino A. 1997 PhRvL 79 1588
- Torres D. F., Vucetich H. and Plastino A. 1998 PhRvL 80 3889
- Tsallis C. 1988 JSP 52 479
- Vauclair S. and Charbonnel C. 1998 ApJ 502 372
- Voronchev V. T., Nakao Y., Tsukida K. and Nakamura M. 2012 PhRvD 85 067301
- Wagoner R. V. 1969 ApJS 18 247
- Wang B., Bertulani B. A. and Balantekin A. B. 2011 PhRvC 83 018801
- Xu Y., Takahashi K. and Goriely S. 2013 NuPhA 918 61
- Yamazaki D. G., Kusakabe M., Kajino T., Mathews G. J. and Cheoun M. K. 2014 PhRvD 90 023001



