Initial Characterization of Active Transitioning Centaur, P/2019 LD2 (ATLAS), Using Hubble, Spitzer, ZTF, Keck, Apache Point Observatory, and GROWTH Visible and Infrared Imaging and Spectroscopy

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and

Published 2021 February 11 © 2021. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Bryce T. Bolin et al 2021 AJ 161 116 DOI 10.3847/1538-3881/abd94b

Download Article PDF
DownloadArticle ePub

You need an eReader or compatible software to experience the benefits of the ePub3 file format.

1538-3881/161/3/116

Abstract

We present visible and mid-infrared imagery and photometry of temporary Jovian co-orbital comet P/2019 LD2 taken with Hubble Space Telescope/Wide Field Camera 3 (HST/WFC3), Spitzer Space Telescope/Infrared Array Camera (Spitzer/IRAC), and the GROWTH telescope network, visible spectroscopy from Keck/Low-Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (LRIS), and archival Zwicky Transient Facility observations taken between 2019 April and 2020 August. Our observations indicate that the nucleus of LD2 has a radius between 0.2 and 1.8 km assuming a 0.08 albedo and a coma dominated by ∼100 μm-scale dust ejected at ∼1 m s−1 speeds with a ∼1' jet pointing in the southwest direction. LD2 experienced a total dust mass loss of ∼108 kg at a loss rate of ∼6 kg s−1 with Afρ/cross section varying between ∼85 cm/125 km2 and ∼200 cm/310 km2 from 2019 April 9 to 2019 November 8. If the increase in Afρ/cross section remained constant, it implies LD2's activity began ∼2018 November when within 4.8 au of the Sun, implying the onset of H2O sublimation. We measure CO/CO2 gas production of ≲1027 mol s−1/≲1026 mol s−1 from our 4.5 μm Spitzer observations; gr = 0.59 ± 0.03, ri = 0.18 ± 0.05, and iz = 0.01 ± 0.07 from GROWTH observations; and H2O gas production of ≲80 kg s−1 scaling from our estimated C2 production of ${Q}_{{C}_{2}}\lesssim 7.5\times {10}^{24}$ mol s−1 from Keck/LRIS spectroscopy. We determine that the long-term orbit of LD2 is similar to Jupiter-family comets having close encounters with Jupiter within ∼0.5 Hill radius in the last ∼3 y and within 0.8 Hill radius in ∼9 y. Additionally, 78.8% of our orbital clones are ejected from the solar system within 1 × 106 yr, having a dynamical half-life of 3.4 × 105 yr.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. Introduction

The gas giant Jupiter is the dominant gravitational perturbing body affecting the dynamical transfer of solar system comets from the outer solar system's trans-Neptunian disk beyond the orbit of Neptune into the inner reaches of the solar system (recently described in Dones et al. 2015). The vast majority of comets transfer from the outer solar system regions such as the Oort Cloud in the case of long-period comets (recently described in Vokrouhlický et al. 2019) or the trans-Neptunian region in the case of short-period comets (recently described in Nesvorný et al. 2017). Once the comets originating from the trans-Neptunian region randomly walk their way through the outer solar system and become strongly influenced by close encounters with Neptune and Uranus, a significant portion are transformed in their orbital configuration into the Centaur group of small bodies. The Centaur class is defined as having semimajor axes, a, and perihelion, q, between 5.2 au, the semimajor axis aJ of Jupiter, and 30 au, the semimajor axis of Neptune, aN (Jewitt 2009). An additional quantity used to define the small bodies in the inner solar system is the Tisserand parameter with respect to Jupiter, TJ, defined as

Equation (1)

where e is the eccentricity of the body and i is the inclination. The parameter TJ can be used as a rough indication of how much an object is influenced by the gravitational perturbations of Jupiter (Murray & Dermott 1999). Centaurs are objects that generally have Tj > 3.05 (Gladman et al. 2008), whereas Jupiter-family comets have 3 > TJ > 2 (Duncan et al. 2004). However, we note that the Tj > 3.05 boundary does not strictly define objects as Centaurs as there can be non-Centaur objects with Tj > 3.05.

The mean dynamical half-life of Centaurs is ∼2.7 Myr, with the vast majority of Centaurs eventually being ejected from the solar system (Horner et al. 2004b), while the Jupiter-family comets have a bit shorter lifetimes of ∼0.5 Myr (Levison & Duncan 1994). The chaotic evolution of the Centaurs causes a significant number (around one-third) to become Jupiter-family comets at some point in their lifetimes, prior to their eventual ejection from the solar system (Horner et al. 2004a). The Centaur 2014 OG392, recently discovered to be active (Chandler et al. 2020), may be an example of an object transitioning between the Centaur and Jupiter-family comet groups. Some can even be temporarily captured as satellites of the giant planets, or by the Jovian and Neptunian Trojan populations (e.g., Horner & Evans 2006; Horner & Lykawka 2012). Another example of a Centaur recently in the stage of becoming a Jupiter-family comet is 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann. Centaur 29P is located in a region of orbital parameter space with 5.5 au < q < 8.0 au and aphelion 5 au < Q < 7 au that acts as a "gateway" that the Centaurs preferentially inhabit while in the process of dynamically transferring to become Jupiter-family comets (Sarid et al. 2019).

The recently discovered, briefly Jovian co-orbital comet P/2019 LD2 (Sato et al. 2020), with a semimajor axis of 5.30 au, a perihelion of 4.57 au, and aphelion of 6.02 au, may be another example of an object in the transition region between Centaur objects and Jupiter-family comets. The comet will only spend about one orbit in the dynamical configuration where it has a Jupiter-similar semimajor axis (Hsieh et al. 2021; Kareta et al. 2020a). Initially reported as an inactive object by the ATLAS survey (Tonry 2011) in 2019 June and designated by the Minor Planet Center as 2019 LD2,25 it was discovered to be active by amateur astronomers.26 Prediscovery images and follow-up images of the comet taken by ATLAS and other ground-based telescopes resulted in it being given the cometary designation P/2019 LD2 (Fitzsimmons et al. 2020). While technically some of the orbital elements of P/2019 LD2, such as its semimajor axis, resemble those of a Jovian co-orbital, it is inherently unstable, in stark contrast to the stable orbits of Jovian Trojans, which are stable on timescales comparable to the age of the solar system and are located at ∼± 60° mean longitude with respect to Jupiter (e.g., Marzari et al. 2002). In addition, the Jovian Trojans have a different origin, having most likely been captured as a result of Jupiter's migration during the solar system's formation, 4.5 Gyr ago (e.g., Morbidelli et al. 2005; Roig & Nesvorný 2015).

One proposed origin for P/2019 LD2 is that it is a Jupiter-family comet in the transition region in orbital parameter space inhabited by objects that are in transition between Centaurs and Jupiter-family comets (Steckloff et al. 2020). As comets transfer from their origins in the outer solar system beyond the orbit of Neptune and become denizens of the inner solar system, they will experience a dramatic shift in thermal environment, due to increased thermal insolation from the Sun (De Sanctis et al. 2000; Sarid & Prialnik 2009). The consequence of the increased solar insolation as the comet nears the Sun is the increased heating and sublimation of volatiles such as CO and H2O near the comet's surface (Meech & Svoren 2004). Another consequence of the increased heating from closer proximity to the Sun is that large-scale ablation of the comet's structure due to thermal stress can occur, resulting in it becoming partially or completely disrupted (Fernández 2009). Since P/2019 LD2 is now in transition between the Centaur and Jupiter-family comet populations, it seems likely that it has become active for the first time, and as such, its activity will be rapidly evolving in response to the new epoch of increased solar heating.

We therefore present in this paper an analysis of visible-light, high-resolution Hubble Space Telescope/Wide Field Camera 3 (HST/WFC3; Dressel 2012) observations of P/2019 LD2 using the approach of Jewitt et al. (2014) and Bolin & Lisse (2020) to understand the dust coma and nucleus properties, and to constrain the cause of P/2019 LD2's activity. We will also use mid-infrared (MIR) P/2019 LD2 observations taken with the Spitzer Space Telescope/Infrared Array Camera (Spitzer/IRAC; Werner et al. 2004) combined with the analysis techniques of Reach et al. (2013) and Lisse et al. (2020) to place upper limits on the comet's CO+CO2 gas production. We also use multiwavelength observations covering the visible and MIR by building on the techniques of Bolin et al. (2020b) by using a network of ground-based observatories to characterize the physical properties of this transitioning Centaur. In addition, we will examine the long-term orbital properties of P/2019 LD2 using its latest orbital solution in order to better understand its possible origins and future dynamical evolution.

2. Observations

Observations of P/2019 LD2 were obtained before the official announcement of its activity in 2020 May both by targeted observations by ground- and space-based observatories and serendipitously in the survey observations by the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF; Graham et al. 2019). The time span of our targeted observations is 2019 September 7 UTC to 2020 August 19 UTC, including observations by the Astrophysical Research Consortium 3.5 m telescope (ARC 3.5 m), Spitzer, HST, Keck I, and members of the GROWTH network (Kasliwal et al. 2019), such as the Mount Laguna Observatory 40 inch Telescope (MLO 1.0 m), Liverpool Telescope (LT), and Lulin Optical Telescope (LOT). A list of our targeted observations and their viewing geometry are provided in Table 1. The time span of our serendipitous observations of P/2019 LD2 made with the ZTF survey is between 2019 April 9 UTC and 2019 November 8 UTC, and the photometry data are listed with the viewing geometry in Table 2.

Table 1.  Summary of P/2019 LD2 Target Observations Viewing Geometry

Date1 Facility2 Filter3 ${\theta }_{s}^{4}$ ${\chi }_{{am}}^{5}$ rH6 Δ7 α8 ${\delta }_{E}^{9}$ $T\,-\,{T}_{p}^{10}$
UTC     ('')   (au) (au) (°) (°) (days)
2019 Apr 26 ZTFa r 2.17 1.76 4.693 4.147 10.99 −1.56 −343.97
2019 Sep 07 ARC g,r 1.4 1.81 4.622 4.279 12.23 −0.74 −216.58
2020 Jan 25–26 Spitzer 4.5 μm 4.584 4.256b 12.61b 0.23b −76.58
2020 Apr 01 HST F350LP 4.578 5.023 10.71 −0.44 −9.58
2020 May 27 MLO 1.0-m B,V,R 1.92 1.49 4.580 4.221 12.38 −2.50 46.42
2020 May 29 LT g,r,i,z 1.21 1.75 4.580 4.193 12.27 −2.56 48.42
2020 June 23–27 LOT B,V,R 1.47 1.14 4.583 3.848 9.59 −3.00 75.42
2020 July 10 LOT B,V,R 1.45 1.15 4.586 3.707 7.11 −2.97 90.42
2020 Aug 19 Keck I Sp.c 0.85 1.80 4.594 3.608 3.20 −1.76 130.42

Notes. Columns: (1) observation date; (2) observational facility; (3) filter (for the Keck I observations, the B600/4000 grism and R600/7500 grating are used with the Low-Resolution Imaging Spectrometer instrumentc); (4) in-image seeing of observations; (5) air mass of observations; (6) heliocentric distance; (7) topocentric distance; (8) phase angle; (9) topocentric and target orbital plane angle; (10) difference between time of observation T and time of perihelion Tp.

aSerendipitous observation of P/2019 LD2 with ZTF, but included in this table because of its inclusion in the top left panel of Figure 1. bSpitzer-centric. c https://www2.keck.hawaii.edu/inst/lris/dispersive_elements.html

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Table 2.  Summary of ZTF P/2019 LD2 Photometry

Date1 rH2 Δ3 α4 $T\,-\,{T}_{p}^{5}$ Filter6 mag7 ${\sigma }_{\mathrm{mag}}^{8}$ ${\theta }_{s}^{9}$ ${\chi }_{{am}}^{10}$ A(0°)fρ11 C12
UTC (au) (au) (°) (days)       ('')   (cm) (km2)
2019 Apr 09-10:32 4.704 4.391 12.0 −360.20 r 19.33 0.15 2.36 1.72 85.28 127.69
2019 Apr 12-10:32 4.702 4.345 11.9 −357.32 r 19.27 0.16 2.83 1.66 87.90 131.53
2019 Apr 15-09:59 4.700 4.300 11.7 −354.47 r 19.13 0.15 1.82 2.02 97.23 145.35
2019 Apr 20-09:33 4.697 4.227 11.4 −349.70 r 18.97 0.23 1.87 1.83 107.69 160.77
2019 Apr 20-10:04 4.697 4.226 11.4 −349.68 r 18.83 0.23 2.44 1.51 122.45 182.81
2019 Apr 26-09:00 4.693 4.142 11.0 −343.97 g 19.69 0.14 2.14 1.91 83.20 124.00
2019 Apr 26-09:07 4.693 4.142 11.0 −343.96 g 19.38 0.13 2.18 2.12 110.69 164.97
2019 Apr 26-11:26 4.693 4.141 11.0 −343.87 r 18.89 0.07 1.90 1.41 109.63 163.38
2019 Apr 26-11:36 4.693 4.141 11.0 −343.86 r 19.18 0.07 1.68 1.37 83.93 125.08
2019 May 02-10:03 4.689 4.061 10.4 −338.17 r 18.95 0.11 2.47 1.56 97.64 145.18
2019 May 02-10:32 4.689 4.061 10.4 −338.15 r 18.99 0.09 1.82 1.41 94.11 139.93
2019 May 31-08:22 4.672 3.763 6.1 −310.33 r 18.76 0.07 1.60 1.44 85.34 125.82
2019 May 31-10:34 4.672 3.762 6.1 −310.24 g 18.96 0.07 1.79 1.44 112.44 165.78
2019 Jun 01-09:04 4.671 3.755 6.0 −309.33 r 18.57 0.05 1.78 1.38 100.81 148.64
2019 Jun 02-09:34 4.671 3.748 5.8 −308.35 r 18.49 0.07 2.53 1.37 107.32 158.24
2019 Jun 02-10:57 4.671 3.748 5.8 −308.29 g 18.95 0.08 1.93 1.52 111.35 164.18
2019 Jun 03-11:33 4.670 3.741 5.6 −307.30 g 18.52 0.18 1.99 1.71 163.56 241.16
2019 Jun 04-07:01 4.670 3.736 5.5 −306.52 r 18.06 0.06 2.07 1.67 156.64 230.96
2019 Jun 04-08:31 4.670 3.736 5.5 −306.46 g 18.68 0.09 2.55 1.40 140.25 206.79
2019 Jun 06-06:37 4.668 3.725 5.1 −304.60 r 18.36 0.08 1.99 1.77 116.28 171.48
2019 Jun 06-08:33 4.668 3.724 5.1 −304.53 g 18.63 0.09 2.11 1.39 143.63 211.82
2019 Jun 07-09:33 4.668 3.719 4.9 −303.52 r 18.14 0.06 1.87 1.39 140.87 207.78
2019 Jun 08-06:36 4.667 3.714 4.8 −302.67 r 18.57 0.09 1.90 1.73 94.15 138.88
2019 Jun 08-09:12 4.667 3.713 4.8 −302.57 g 18.56 0.08 2.07 1.37 150.52 222.03
2019 Jun 09-06:36 4.667 3.709 4.6 −301.71 r 18.38 0.06 1.89 1.70 111.02 163.79
2019 Jun 10-07:02 4.666 3.704 4.5 −300.72 r 18.34 0.06 1.90 1.56 114.39 168.78
2019 Jun 10-08:03 4.666 3.704 4.5 −300.68 g 18.70 0.10 2.27 1.40 130.13 192.01
2019 Jun 11-09:43 4.666 3.699 4.3 −299.65 g 18.90 0.10 1.93 1.42 107.13 158.11
2019 Jun 14-08:02 4.664 3.688 3.9 −296.81 g 18.74 0.22 2.03 1.38 121.43 179.30
2019 Jun 20-07:50 4.661 3.673 3.3 −291.02 g 18.61 0.22 2.51 1.38 132.47 195.84
2019 Jun 20-08:17 4.661 3.673 3.3 −291.00 r 18.15 0.10 1.97 1.37 127.68 188.75
2019 Jun 23-09:02 4.659 3.669 3.2 −288.07 r 18.23 0.08 2.41 1.43 117.79 174.17
2019 Jun 23-10:34 4.659 3.669 3.2 −288.00 g 18.77 0.18 2.57 1.84 113.53 167.87
2019 Jun 26-07:37 4.657 3.667 3.2 −285.22 r 18.21 0.05 1.87 1.37 119.75 177.06
2019 Jun 26-08:02 4.657 3.667 3.2 −285.20 g 18.80 0.08 2.19 1.38 110.22 162.98
2019 Jul 01-06:45 4.655 3.671 3.5 −280.41 r 18.33 0.05 1.84 1.40 108.62 160.51
2019 Jul 01-06:46 4.655 3.671 3.5 −280.41 r 18.33 0.05 1.77 1.39 108.62 160.51
2019 Jul 01-07:44 4.655 3.671 3.5 −280.37 r 18.34 0.06 2.37 1.38 107.63 159.04
2019 Jul 01-07:44 4.655 3.671 3.5 −280.37 r 18.34 0.06 2.18 1.38 107.63 159.04
2019 Jul 03-07:10 4.654 3.674 3.8 −278.45 r 18.17 0.05 2.31 1.37 127.49 188.29
2019 Jul 03-07:32 4.654 3.674 3.8 −278.44 g 18.58 0.07 2.14 1.37 138.51 204.56
2019 Jul 04-07:36 4.653 3.676 3.9 −277.46 r 18.09 0.05 2.04 1.38 137.86 203.57
2019 Jul 06-06:43 4.652 3.681 4.2 −275.56 g 18.74 0.09 1.92 1.38 121.73 179.68
2019 Jul 08-07:32 4.651 3.687 4.5 −273.59 g 18.48 0.07 1.92 1.39 156.89 231.49
2019 Jul 09-05:29 4.651 3.690 4.6 −272.70 r 18.13 0.04 1.58 1.48 137.39 202.69
2019 Jul 09-07:36 4.651 3.690 4.6 −272.61 g 18.61 0.07 1.84 1.40 139.94 206.46
2019 Jul 10-06:01 4.650 3.694 4.8 −271.71 r 18.21 0.06 2.02 1.41 128.82 190.02
2019 Jul 10-06:02 4.650 3.694 4.8 −271.71 r 18.06 0.06 2.30 1.41 147.90 218.17
2019 Jul 10-06:13 4.650 3.694 4.8 −271.70 r 18.27 0.06 1.96 1.39 121.89 179.80
2019 Jul 10-06:31 4.650 3.694 4.8 −271.69 r 18.20 0.07 2.44 1.38 130.01 191.77
2019 Jul 10-06:41 4.650 3.694 4.8 −271.68 r 18.15 0.05 2.04 1.37 136.14 200.81
2019 Jul 10-06:42 4.650 3.694 4.8 −271.68 r 18.18 0.06 2.14 1.37 132.43 195.34
2019 Jul 11-07:29 4.649 3.698 4.9 −270.68 g 18.70 0.13 1.90 1.40 130.73 192.82
2019 Jul 12-06:32 4.649 3.702 5.1 −269.74 r 18.23 0.11 2.46 1.37 128.40 189.36
2019 Jul 12-06:33 4.649 3.702 5.1 −269.74 r 18.25 0.10 2.35 1.37 126.06 185.90
2019 Jul 12-07:24 4.649 3.702 5.1 −269.71 g 18.53 0.15 2.01 1.40 154.37 227.66
2019 Jul 13-06:03 4.648 3.706 5.3 −268.79 r 18.12 0.10 2.49 1.39 143.40 211.46
2019 Jul 13-07:51 4.648 3.707 5.3 −268.72 g 18.80 0.24 1.69 1.45 121.56 179.25
2019 Jul 16-05:21 4.647 3.721 5.8 −265.91 g 18.57 0.28 2.10 1.39 154.15 227.28
2019 Jul 16-06:32 4.647 3.721 5.8 −265.86 r 18.26 0.16 1.92 1.39 129.40 190.79
2019 Jul 20-06:54 4.645 3.745 6.5 −261.96 g 18.65 0.16 2.67 1.45 148.69 219.26
2019 Jul 21-05:12 4.645 3.751 6.6 −261.05 r 18.22 0.04 1.52 1.38 140.36 206.99
2019 Jul 21-05:13 4.645 3.751 6.6 −261.05 r 18.18 0.04 1.58 1.38 145.63 214.76
2019 Jul 21-05:43 4.644 3.751 6.6 −261.03 r 18.17 0.05 1.44 1.37 146.91 216.66
2019 Jul 21-06:07 4.644 3.751 6.7 −261.01 r 18.34 0.05 1.46 1.38 126.07 185.94
2019 Jul 21-06:44 4.644 3.752 6.7 −260.99 r 18.35 0.09 2.67 1.43 124.98 184.33
2019 Jul 21-06:44 4.644 3.752 6.7 −260.99 r 18.31 0.08 2.71 1.44 129.68 191.25
2019 Jul 30-06:02 4.640 3.820 8.2 −252.26 r 18.21 0.05 1.85 1.42 155.19 229.33
2019 Jul 30-06:03 4.640 3.820 8.2 −252.26 r 18.20 0.04 1.70 1.42 156.63 231.45
2019 Jul 30-06:29 4.640 3.820 8.2 −252.24 r 18.27 0.05 1.92 1.49 146.85 217.00
2019 Jul 30-06:30 4.640 3.820 8.2 −252.24 r 18.30 0.05 1.82 1.49 142.85 211.08
2019 Aug 03-04:02 4.638 3.856 8.8 −248.45 r 18.31 0.10 1.65 1.40 147.13 217.68
2019 Aug 12-03:38 4.634 3.949 10.0 −239.69 r 18.11 0.16 3.23 1.39 192.88 286.40
2019 Aug 16-07:30 4.632 3.996 10.5 −235.63 r 18.34 0.16 1.83 1.78 162.34 241.48
2019 Aug 19-03:27 4.631 4.030 10.8 −232.87 r 18.33 0.09 1.41 1.38 168.23 250.52
2019 Aug 23-04:03 4.629 4.080 11.2 −228.94 g 18.73 0.09 1.80 1.39 191.39 285.49
2019 Aug 28-04:52 4.627 4.145 11.6 −224.02 r 18.34 0.06 1.73 1.54 180.68 269.98
2019 Aug 28-04:53 4.627 4.145 11.6 −224.02 r 18.37 0.06 1.78 1.54 175.75 262.63
2019 Aug 28-05:28 4.627 4.146 11.6 −223.99 r 18.43 0.06 1.56 1.71 166.38 248.63
2019 Aug 28-05:29 4.627 4.146 11.6 −223.99 r 18.51 0.06 1.68 1.72 154.56 230.97
2019 Aug 29-04:45 4.627 4.159 11.7 −223.05 r 18.37 0.06 2.22 1.53 177.51 265.38
2019 Aug 29-04:46 4.627 4.159 11.7 −223.05 r 18.43 0.07 2.42 1.53 167.97 251.11
2019 Aug 29-05:46 4.627 4.159 11.7 −223.00 r 18.37 0.06 1.60 1.86 177.51 265.38
2019 Aug 29-05:46 4.627 4.159 11.7 −223.00 r 18.38 0.06 1.62 1.87 175.88 262.95
2019 Aug 29-06:13 4.627 4.159 11.7 −222.99 g 18.85 0.14 1.96 2.13 180.81 270.31
2019 Sep 02-03:50 4.625 4.212 12.0 −219.17 g 18.94 0.11 1.84 1.43 172.19 257.81
2019 Sep 02-05:06 4.625 4.213 12.0 −219.12 r 18.56 0.09 2.20 1.70 154.25 230.94
2019 Sep 03-03:40 4.624 4.226 12.0 −218.20 g 18.73 0.14 1.85 1.41 210.23 314.76
2019 Sep 09-03:04 4.622 4.309 12.3 −212.35 g 18.97 0.26 1.95 1.40 176.75 265.04
2019 Sep 09-05:38 4.622 4.311 12.3 −212.25 r 18.65 0.22 2.84 2.23 149.88 224.75
2019 Sep 25-03:09 4.616 4.540 12.5 −196.68 r 18.61 0.12 4.13 1.57 173.11 259.86
2019 Sep 25-04:55 4.616 4.542 12.5 −196.61 g 19.11 0.23 2.74 2.55 173.26 260.09
2019 Oct 01-03:35 4.614 4.628 12.4 −190.78 g 18.95 0.12 2.15 1.67 207.61 311.48
2019 Oct 09-02:21 4.611 4.742 12.2 −182.98 g 19.16 0.25 1.78 1.49 178.27 267.18
2019 Oct 12-02:42 4.610 4.785 12.0 −180.02 r 18.50 0.12 2.11 1.62 208.92 312.79
2019 Oct 16-02:42 4.608 4.840 11.8 −176.09 g 19.09 0.17 2.40 1.70 195.32 292.15
2019 Oct 19-02:09 4.607 4.881 11.6 −173.17 r 18.71 0.12 1.47 1.59 176.65 263.96
2019 Oct 19-02:36 4.607 4.882 11.6 −173.15 g 19.10 0.14 1.94 1.74 195.56 292.23
2019 Oct 22-02:40 4.606 4.922 11.4 −170.20 g 19.14 0.15 2.32 1.852 190.28 284.07
2019 Oct 26-02:30 4.605 4.975 11.1 −166.27 g 19.42 0.22 3.93 1.891 148.68 221.69
2019 Oct 26-02:35 4.605 4.975 11.1 −166.27 r 18.57 0.12 2.23 1.935 205.24 306.01
2019 Nov 08-01:48 4.601 5.135 9.9 −153.51 r 18.60 0.19 2.13 1.755 204.05 302.88

Note. Columns: (1) observation date; (2) heliocentric distance; (3) topocentric distance; (4) phase angle; (5) difference between time of observation T and time of perihelion Tp; (6) filter; (7) 2 × 104 km aperture mag; (8) 1σ mag uncertainty; (9) in-image seeing of observations; (10) air mass of observations; (11) A(0°)fρ of observations; (12) cross section of observations.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

2.1. Zwicky Transient Facility

We searched for serendipitous observations of P/2019 LD2 made with the Zwicky Transient Facility survey mounted on the Palomar Observatory's 48 inch telescope (Bellm et al. 2019) in the ZTF archive (Masci et al. 2019). The ZTF archive possessed observations of P/2019 LD2 made as far back as 2019 April 9 UTC, which we include up to 2019 November 8 UTC. The observations were made in the g and r bands in images consisting of 30 s exposures. Seeing conditions were typically between 1farcs5 and 2farcs5 and at air masses ranging from 1.4 to 2.6. A full list of observations of P/2019 LD2 made by ZTF containing the viewing geometry and observing conditions is presented in Table 2.

2.2. Apache Point Astrophysical Research Consortium 3.5 m

Following the announcement of the appearance of activity of P/2019 LD22 (then called 2019 LD2), we triggered target-of-opportunity observations with the ARC 3.5 m telescope at Apache Point Observatory (APO) on 2019 September 7 UTC using the ARCTIC large-format optical CCD camera (Huehnerhoff et al. 2016). The camera was used in full-frame, quad amplifier readout, 2 × 2 binning mode, resulting in a pixel scale of 0farcs228, and it was used with the g and r filters. In total, 14 g and r exposures were obtained, each 120 s long and in alternating order between the g and r filters. The telescope was tracked at the sky-motion rate of the comet of 8farcs6 hr−1. The seeing was 1farcs4 and the air mass was 1.8 during the observations.

2.3. Spitzer Space Telescope

Observations of P/2019 LD2 were made with the Spitzer Space Telescope (Spitzer) using the IRAC instrument (Fazio et al. 2004) on 2020 January 25–26 UTC (DDT program 14331, PI Bolin et al. 2019). The observations consisted of 11 Astronomical Observing Requests (AORs), each consisting of 80 × 12 s dithered frames and having a ∼0.44 hr duration for a total of 4.8 hr clock time. The frames where dithered in groups of 10, with each using a large cycling pattern. The sky at the location of P/2019 LD2 during the Spitzer observations possessed a high density of stars due to its low −18° galactic latitude, so shadow observations were used to improve the sensitivity of the observations. Out of a total of 11 AORs, eight were focused on the observed P/2019 LD2, for a total of 2.13 hr of on-source time. The remaining three AORs were shadow observations that were evenly spaced in the sky location covering the trajectory of P/2019 LD2 during 2020 January 02:23:32–23:10:44 that P/2019 LD2 was being observed. The target was centered in the 4.5 μm channel because this channel is sensitive to CO/CO2 emission and also because the object was expected to be the brightest at this wavelength. The 4.5 μm IRAC channel has a spatial resolution of 1farcs2 pixel−1. The data were reduced in a method as described in Fernández et al. (2013).

2.4. Hubble Space Telescope

The Hubble Space Telescope was used to observe P/2019 LD2 with General Observer's (GO) time on 2020 April 1 UTC (HST GO 16077, PI Bolin et al. 2020a). During the one orbit visit, five 380 s F350LP filter exposures were obtained with the UVIS2 array of the WFC3/UVIS camera (Dressel 2012) for a total of 1900 s of integration time over a single orbit. The F350LP filter has a central wavelength of 582 nm with an FWHM bandpass of 490 nm (Deustua et al. 2017). The instrument and filter combination of WFC3 and the F350LP filter provides a per-pixel resolution of 0farcs04 corresponding to 145 km at the topocentric distance of the comet. The comet was tracked nonsidereally according to its sky-plane rate of motion of 40'' hr−1.

2.5. Mount Laguna Observatory 40 inch Telescope

Multiband optical images of P/2019 LD2 were obtained with the 1.0 m Telescope at the Mount Laguna Observatory (Smith & Nelson 1969) on 2020 May 17 UTC. Johnson–Cousins B, V, and R filters were used in combination with the E2V 42–40 CCD camera to obtain seven to nine 120 s exposures in each filter. The seeing conditions were 1farcs92, the air mass was 1.49, and sidereal tracking was used. This facility is a member of the GROWTH collaboration.

2.6. Liverpool Telescope

Observations of P/2019 LD2 were made in g, r, i, and z filters by the 2 m Liverpool Telescope located at the Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos on 2020 May 29 UTC. The IO:O wide-field camera was used with a 2 × 2 binning, providing a pixel scale of 0farcs3 (Steele et al. 2004). Two 30 s exposures were made per filter with the telescope tracking at the sidereal rate. The seeing conditions were 1farcs21, and the air mass was 1.75. Detrending of data was performed using the automated IO:O pipeline software (Steele et al. 2004). This facility is a member of the GROWTH collaboration.

2.7. Lulin Optical Telescope

Multiband B, V, and R imaging of P/2019 LD2 was made by the 1 m Lulin Optical Telescope on 2020 June 23–27 UTC and 2020 July 10 UTC. The observations were made using the 2K × 2K SOPHIA camera with a pixel scale of 0farcs52 (Kinoshita et al. 2005). Exposure times of 90 s were where the telescope was tracked at the nonsidereal rate determined by the ephemeris of the comet. The seeing conditions of the observations were ∼1farcs5, and the air mass was ∼1.15.

2.8. Keck I Telescope

A spectrum of P/2019 LD2 was obtained using the Low-Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (LRIS; Oke et al. 1995) on the Keck I telescope on 2020 August 19 UTC (PI J. von Roestel, C272). The blue camera consisting of a 2 × 2K × 4K Marconi CCD array was used with the red camera consisting of a science-grade Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 2K × 4K CCD array. Both cameras have a spatial resolution of 0farcs135 pixel−1. We used the 560 nm dichroic with ∼50% transmission efficiency in combination with the 600/4000 grism for the blue camera, rebinned twice in both the spectral and spatial directions, and the 600/7500 grating for the red camera, rebinned once in the spectral direction and twice in the spatial direction, providing a spectral resolution of 0.8 nm and 0.5 nm, respectively, and a spatial resolution of 0farcs27. A total integration time of 300 s was used for the exposure and was obtained at air mass 1farcs8 in 0farcs85 seeing conditions. Both telluric correction and solar-analog stars were observed at air masses similar to that of P/2019 LD2. Wavelength calibration was completed using the HgCdZn lamps for the blue camera and the ArNeXe lamps for the red camera. We used a local solar-analog star to remove the solar component from the spectrum of P/2019 LD2. The LPipe spectroscopy reduction package was used to reduce the data (Perley 2019).

3. Results

3.1. Morphology and Nucleus

Serendipitous prediscovery observations of P/2019 LD2 were obtained with ZTF on 2019 April 26 UTC consisting of three 30 s exposures in the r band. These prediscovery data of P/2019 LD2 have been coadded into a composite image with an equivalent 90 s integration time presented in the top left panel of Figure 1. The comet has an extended appearance with a ∼20'' long tail with a position angle of ∼260° in the antisolar direction. ZTF obtained prediscovery detections of P/2019 LD2 on 2019 April 9, 15, and 20, but the comet did not have a discernible extended appearance in these data.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Top left panel: a 90 s equivalent exposure time stack of 3 × 30 s r-filter images of P/2019 LD2 taken by ZTF on 2019 April 26 UTC. The image stack was compiled using the ZChecker software (Kelley et al. 2019). The pixel scale is 1''/pixel, and the seeing was ∼2farcs2. An arrow indicating a width of 10'' is shown for scale, equivalent to ∼30,000 km at the geocentric distance of 4.15 au of the comet on 2020 April 26 UTC. The solar, orbital velocity, and cardinal directions are indicated. Top right panel: a 2400 s equivalent exposure time robust mean stack of 20 × 120 s r-filter images of P/2019 LD2 taken with the ARC 3.5 m telescope on 2019 September 7 UTC. The telescope was tracked at the comet's motion. The pixel scale is 0farcs228 pixel−1 and the seeing was ∼1farcs4. An arrow indicating a width of 10'' is shown for scale, equivalent to ∼31,000 km at the geocentric distance of 4.28 au of the comet on 2020 September 7 UTC. Center panel: a 1900 s equivalent exposure time robust mean stack of 5 × 380 s F350LP filter images of P/2019 LD2 taken with HST/WFC3 on 2020 April 1 UTC. The pixel scale is 0farcs04/pixel. An arrow indicating a width of 3'' is shown for scale, equivalent to ∼11,000 km at the geocentric distance of 5.02 au of the comet on 2020 April 1 UTC. Bottom panel: the same as the center panel but normalized according to the radial profile of the comet. A ∼1'' jet-like structure is seen with a position angle of ∼210°.

Standard image High-resolution image

On 2019 September 7 UTC, the ARC 3.5 m was used to obtain 20 × 120 s exposures of P/2019 LD2 in the r band. A composite median stack with an equivalent exposure time of 2400 s is presented in the top right panel of Figure 1. In the ARC 3.5 m images, the comet has a diffuse, nonstellar appearance. The tail is not easily defined in the ARC 3.5 m median stack, though the comet's extended appearance is enhanced in the opposite direction of the comet's orbital motion with a position angle of ∼230° and length of 5''.

The center panel of Figure 1 presents the appearance of P/2019 LD2 in a median stack of five 380 s F350LP images with an equivalent integration time of 1900 s taken with HST/WFC3 on 2020 April 01 UTC. Cosmic rays have been removed from the composite image stack, with median interpolation of the surrounding pixels. The high-resolution composite HST stack was taken when the comet was at an orbit-plane angle of ∼−0fdg44 and had a tail with a length of ∼32'' limited by background structure caused by galaxies and sky noise opposite to the solar direction with a position angle of ∼250°. The ∼32''-long tail translates into a length of 6.2 × 108 m given its topocentric distance of 5.02 au and a phase angle of 10fdg7. An enhanced version of the HST median composite stack normalized by the distance from the optocenter reveals a possible jet structure ∼1'' long, as seen in the bottom panel of Figure 1. We will discuss the implications of the comet's morphology from these observations for its dust properties in Section 3.3.

We compare the surface-brightness profile of P/2019 LD2 to the simulated surface-brightness profile of a G2 field star WFC3 point-spread function (PSF) assuming the use of the F350LP filter using the TinyTim software (Krist et al. 2011), as seen in Figure 2. The radial profiles of both P/2019 LD2 and the simulated stellar G2V source are computed by azimuthally averaging concentric apertures centered on the optocenter separated by the pixel scale allowed by WFC3 using the F350LP filter. The normalized surface-brightness profile of P/2019 LD2 between 0farcs24 and 1farcs2 was fit to the functional form of Σ ∝ θm, where Σ is the surface brightness and θ is the distance from the optocenter in pixels, resulting in a radial profile slope of m ∼ −1.71. We note that the radial profile slope is steeper than the typical −1 to −1.5 radial profile slope of comets with an isotopic coma in a steady state. The steeper radial profile slope of P/2019 LD2 compared to comets with isotopic coma may be an independent indication of the comet's evolving dust production rate (Jewitt & Meech 1987).

Figure 2.

Figure 2. Normalized surface-brightness profile of P/2019 LD2 taken with HST/WFC3 on 2020 April 1 UTC presented as yellow circles with a connecting blue line. A surface-brightness profile of Σ ∝ θ−1.71 fitted to the profile of P/2019 LD2 between 0farcs24 and 1farcs20 is plotted as the cyan line using the same vertical scale as the the normalized surface-brightness profile of P/2019 LD2. The normalized surface-brightness profile of a F350LP stellar PSF assuming a G2V-like source generated using TinyTim (Krist et al. 2011) is plotted as purple circles with a connecting orange line. The surface-brightness profile resulting from the convolution of the F350LP stellar PSF and the fitted Σ ∝ θ−1.71 surface-brightness profile of P/2019 LD2 is plotted as a pink line using the same vertical scale as the the normalized surface-brightness profile of P/2019 LD2. Logarithmic surface-brightness gradients with m = −1 and m = −2 are plotted as green and red lines, respectively, for comparison. Statistical error bars on the surface brightness computed assuming Poissonian statistics at each radius element are smaller than the plot symbols used for both P/2019 LD2 and the synthetic stellar PSF.

Standard image High-resolution image

The fitted 0farcs24–1farcs2 radial profile of P/2019 LD2 was convolved with the synthetic G2V PSF and subtracted from the measured radial profile of P/2019 LD2 to calculate a equivalent nucleus brightness of V = 22.6 ± 0.04 assuming a mV-mF350LP ∼ 0.1 (Bolin et al. 2020b). We assume the following phase function for determining the absolute magnitude of the nucleus, H:

Equation (2)

where rh, Δ, and α are the heliocentric distance, topocentric distance, and phase angle of the comet as listed in Table 1 for the 2020 April 1 UTC observation. Here, Φ(α) = 0.04α, where we assume a phase coefficient of 0.04 in magnitudes/degree, resulting in H = 15.53 ± 0.05. The true phase coefficient of P/2019 LD2 is unknown, so our uncertainty on the measured value of H is considered a lower limit.

From our measured value of H, we calculate the light-scattering cross section, C, of P/2019 LD2 in km2 using the following function:

Equation (3)

where pv is the albedo of the nucleus, assumed to be ∼0.08, the typical albedo measured for Centaurs (Bauer et al. 2013), resulting in C = 11.15 ± 0.42 km2. Converting our measured cross section to a radius using r = (C/π)2, we obtain a radius of ∼1.8 km, comparable to the radius estimates of P/2019 LD2 based on unresolved photometry and the nondetection of P/2019 LD2 from ground-based observations (Schambeau et al. 2020). We note that this is a radius estimate based on a single observation and represents a size assuming a spheroidal shape. Significant deviations from a spheroidal shape, such as a bilobal (Nesvorný et al. 2018) or elongated shape (Bolin et al. 2018; Hanuš et al. 2018) as has been observed for other comet-like bodies, may require additional observations to be made of P/2019 LD2 to accurately determine its size.

3.2. Photometry and Lightcurve

Using the combination of our ground-based observations with the ARC 3.5 m taken on 2019 September 7 UTC, the MLO 1.0 m on 2020 May 27 UTC, the LT on 2020 May 29 UTC, and the Lulin Optical Observatory on 2020 July 10 UTC, we have calculated the mean colors of P/2019 LD2 using 10,000 km photometric apertures of gr = 0.60 ± 0.03, ri = 0.18 ± 0.05, and iz = 0.01 ± 0.07. The filter configuration and viewing geometry of our observations are presented in Table 1. The equivalent angular size of the 10,000 km used in our photometric calculations ranged from 3farcs2 to 3farcs7, with the seeing during observations ranging from 1farcs2 to 1farcs9. We used the color transformations from Jordi et al. (2006) to convert the BVR Johnson–Cousins photometry of P/2019 LD2 from the MLO 1.0 m and LT to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) system.

Our visible measured colors of P/2019 LD2 are reddish to neutral in the ∼480 nm to ∼910 nm wavelength range covered by our filters, which is consistent with the measured colors of other active solar system comets as presented in Figure 3. For comparison purposes only, we have included the colors of inactive objects in Figure 3. We note that the measured colors of P/2019 LD2 from our observations are somewhat bluer than the colors of active and inactive Centaurs measured by Jewitt (2015), though this may be due to the longer wavelength coverage of our observations, which go as far as ∼910 nm, compared to the shorter visible-wavelength observations of Jewitt (2015).

Figure 3.

Figure 3. gr vs. rz colors of P/2019 LD2 plotted with gr and rz colors of inactive solar system C-, S-, and V-type asteroids (Ivezić et al. 2001; Jurić et al. 2002; DeMeo & Carry 2013), active comets (Solontoi et al. 2012), and Kuiper Belt objects (Ofek 2012). The colorization scheme of data points for asteroids by their griz colors is adapted from Ivezić et al. (2002). The colors of active and inactive Centaurs from Jewitt (2015) are also included. The most appropriate color comparison between the color of P/2019 LD2 and other solar system bodies is between the active comets in Solontoi et al. (2012) and the active Centaurs from Jewitt (2015) because the colors of P/2019 LD2 are most representative of its dust rather than bare nucleus. The colors of inactive bodies are included for comparison purposes only.

Standard image High-resolution image

Images from each of the Spitzer DDT program 14331 AORs 1, 4, 6, 9, and 10 that were used to take images of P/2019 LD2 from 2020 January 25 2:23 to 23:11 UTC were reduced using the reduction methods described in Fernández et al. (2013). Images obtained during each of these five AORs using the 4.5 μm channel were coadded to form a single composite image with an equivalent exposure time of 948 s for each AOR.

P/2019 LD2 was located in a crowded star field at a galactic latitude of ∼−18°. Therefore, due to the imperfections in the shadowing technique, we used an aperture size with an angular width of 3farcs24, equivalent to 10,000 km at the topocentric distance of 4.26 au of the comet from Spitzer. We obtain an on-source flux density for P/2019 LD2 of 35.6 ± 2.8 μJy at 4.5 μm using the average of the five photometry measurements from the composite images made from each of the AORs 1, 4, 6, 9, and 10. The comet has a slightly extended appearance of more than ∼2farcs4 as seen in Figure 4, and an aperture correction was applied to the flux density measurement. The flux from the nucleus assuming a kilometer-scale nucleus radius as measured in Section 3.1 is ∼0.1 μJy, less than 1% of the total flux.

Figure 4.

Figure 4. A 948 s equivalent integration time composite image stack made from Spitzer/IRAC observations of P/2019 LD2 taken during Spitzer DDT program 14331 AOR 1 on 2020 January 25 02:23:32 UTC. The detection of P/2019 LD2 has been encircled in yellow. The pixel scale is 1farcs2 pixel−1. An arrow indicating the width of 10'' is shown for scale, equivalent to ∼31,000 km at the topocentric distance of 4.256 au of the comet on 2020 January 25 UTC. The solar, orbital velocity, and cardinal directions are indicated.

Standard image High-resolution image

We present the Afρ based on the Spitzer/IRAC photometry of P/2019 LD2 using the Afρ definition of A'Hearn et al. (1984), which is a quantity in units of length, in this case centimeters, that corrects the comet's brightness with respect to heliocentric distance, geocentric distance, aperture size, solar spectrum, and filter wavelength. The values Afρ are normalized to 0° phase angle, A(0°)fρ, using the Halley–Marcus cometary phase function defined by Schleicher & Bair (2011). Assuming that the entirety of the flux in the 4.5 μm Spitzer/IRAC observations is from dust in local thermal equilibrium, we calculate A(0°)fρ = 334 cm. This is strictly an upper limit on A(0°)fρ, due to the possible contribution of gas in the measured flux of the comet.

If we assume that the entirety of the flux from the comet is from CO emission and that the gas speed is 0.5 km s−1, we measure a gas production rate of 1.6 ± 0.1 × 1027 mol s−1, which is similar to the results of Kareta et al. (2020b). For CO2, assuming that the entirety of the flux is due to gas emission, we obtain a gas production rate of 1.4 ± 0.1 × 1026 mol s−1, which is comparable to the CO2 measured for comets observed in the MIR at similar heliocentric distances (Reach et al. 2013; Bauer et al. 2015).

Using our archival observations of P/2019 LD2 from ZTF taken between 2019 April 9 UTC and 2019 November 8 UTC, we have plotted the equivalent r magnitudes of P/2019 LD2 as a function of time since the perihelion date of 2020 April 10 UTC, (TTp), measured with equivalent 20,000 km apertures and presented in the top panel of Figure 5 with observational details in Table 2. These observations include data taken in the g band, which have been corrected to an equivalent r-band magnitude using our gr color estimate for P/2019 LD2 of ∼0.6. The 20,000 km aperture was equivalent to an angular size of 5farcs4 on 2019 November 8 UTC, when the comet had a geocentric distance of 5.14 au and an angular size of 7.52'', and when the comet had a geocentric distance of 3.67 au on 2019 July 1 UTC. The measured local seeing in the ZTF images at the time of observation ranged between 1farcs6 and 3farcs9 with a median seeing value of 2farcs0. Using only the r-band photometry, the data show a secular brightening trend of the comet as the comet approached opposition on 2019 June 24.42 UTC and was increasing in brightness by 1.6 ± 0.2 × 10−2 mags/day. After leaving opposition, the comet showed an asymmetrical secular fading trend of 0.4 ± 0.1 × 10−2 mags/day compared to the preopposition brightening trend.

Figure 5.

Figure 5. Top panel: g- and r-band photometric lightcurve of P/2019 LD2 versus time from perihelion (TTp) measured using a fixed 20,000 km aperture between 2019 April 9 UTC and 2019 November 8 UTC using the data from Table 2. Multiple lines of A(0°)fρ = 94 cm, 113 cm, 136 cm, 189 cm are shown as purple and red solid and dashed lines to reflect the change in the comet's brightness as the comet moved through opposition at (TTp) = −291.5 days on 2019 June 24 UTC, which is shown as a vertical gray dotted line. In addition, values of A(0°)fρ calculated using the brightness values and viewing geometry in Table 2 are presented as dark blue data points connected by a light blue solid line. Bottom panel: scattering cross section of P/2019 LD2 calculated using Equation (3) as a function of days since 2019 April 09 UTC from the photometric data presented in Table 2. The black line shows the minimized χ2 fit to the cross-sectional measurements, and the vertical dashed–dotted line corresponds to the date when P/2019 LD2 was at opposition on 2019 June 24 UTC.

Standard image High-resolution image

In addition to photometry, we present the Afρ based on the ZTF photometry of P/2019 LD2 as implemented by Mommert et al. (2019). The values Afρ are normalized to 0° phase angle, A(0°)fρ, and are plotted against the second Y-axis in the top panel of Figure 5 and presented in Table 2. Values of constant A(0°)fρ are plotted for reference in the top panel of Figure 5. The value of A(0°)fρ rises consistently over the span of our observations, resulting in asymmetry in the brightness of P/2019 LD2 as it passed through opposition on 2019 June 24 UTC (TTp = −291 days). Before opposition, between TTp = −370 and −312, the error-weighted mean of A(0°)fρ = 93.9 ± 11.8 cm, and between TTp = −312 and −291, A(0°)fρ = 113.1 ± 8.57 cm. After opposition, the error-weighted mean of A(0°)fρ between TTp = −291 and −211 equaled 136.2 ± 9.7 cm, and from TTp = −211 and −50, A(0°)fρ = 188.8 ± 25.8 cm. The range of A(0°)fρ from 85 cm to 200 cm is consistent with the observed Afρ range of comets, which ranges from 1 to 10,000 cm (A'Hearn et al. 1995).

3.3. Dust Properties and Mass Loss

In addition to calculating the A(0°)fρ of P/2019 LD2, we calculate the value of C for each of the equivalent r-band magnitudes in Table 2 using Equation (3), which are plotted in the bottom panel of Figure 5. A linear function is fit to these data, resulting in a fitted slope parameter value of dC/dt = 0.94 ± 0.06 km2/day. The change in phase angle over the time of our observations is modest, as seen in Table 2, so variations in the phase function used to calculate C should have a minimal effect on the estimate of the uncertainty of our measured slope parameter. Extrapolating backward in time beyond the range of our data results in C = 0 km2 at ∼135 days before 2019 April 9 UTC, the date of our first photometry data point, or on 2018 November 24 UTC, during which P/2019 LD2 had a heliocentric distance of ∼4.8 au, when water ice begins to sublimate (Lisse et al. 2019).

The dimensionless ratio of solar radiation and gravitational forces is defined by β (Burns et al. 1979):

Equation (4)

where L0 is the length of dust travel, in this case, the observed length of the tail of P/2019 LD2 of 6.2 × 108 m; rH is the heliocentric distance; g(1au) is the gravitational acceleration toward the Sun at 1 au equal to 6.0 × 10−3 m/s2; and t is the time of particle release. Assuming a mean value of rH ∼ 4.6 au, L0 = 6.2 × 108 m, the length of the tail estimated from the 2020 April 1 UTC HST/WFC3 images, and t = 4.3 × 107 s, the time between the 2020 April 1 UTC HST/WFC3 observations and the estimated start of the activity, we calculate a value of β = 2.4 × 103. Making the assumption that the dust particles are dielectric spheres (Bohren & Huffman 1983), we find that the reciprocal of our estimated value of β translates into a particle size, $\bar{a}$, of ∼400 μm. However, we caution that this may be an upper limit on the dust size because of the limitations of our tail length measurement by the contamination of background galaxies in the HST/WFC3 images due to variations in the activity of P/2019 LD2 affecting our estimate of t based on the backward extrapolation of the photometric data.

Assuming our estimated particle size of ∼400 μm, we estimate the total mass loss over the duration of our ZTF observations between 2019 April 9 UTC and 2019 November 8 UTC as M = 4/3 $\rho \bar{a}{\rm{\Delta }}C$, where ΔC is the difference between the cross sections at the start and end of our observations and is equal to 220 km2. Assuming a dust density of 1 kg m−3 (McDonnell et al. 1986), we obtain a total mass loss over the time span of our observations of ∼108 kg. Adopting our estimated value of dC/dt ∼ 1 km2/day, we obtain a mass-loss rate using $\dot{M}=4/3\rho \bar{a}$ dC/dt ∼ 5 × 105 kg/day.

To estimate the fraction of active area of P/2019 LD2, A, we take the ratio between the mass-loss rate and the equilibrium mass sublimation flux at 4.6 au, fs = 1.4 × 10−5 kg m−2 (Jewitt et al. 2015), where A ∼ 0.4 km2. Thus, ∼10% of P/2019 LD2's surface is active assuming our inferred size radius of 1.8 km from Section 3.1, comparable to the active surface area measured for Jupiter-family comets (Fernández et al. 1999). An alternative assumption is that P/2019 LD2 has a 100% active area, setting a lower limit to its radius of 0.2 km.

In addition, we use the perpendicular profile of P/2019 LD2 taken with the high-resolution images from HST/WFC3 to estimate the out-of-plane distribution of dust with a minimum of projection effects as the Earth passed through the projected orbital plane of P/2019 LD2 with a projected orbital plane angle of only 0fdg4 on 2020 April 1 UTC. We measured the FWHM along the direction perpendicular to the tail's profile as a function of distance from the optocenter, T, between 0 and ∼2'' in increments of 0farcs12 slices, as plotted in Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Figure 6. FWHM of the dust tail of P/2019 LD2 versus the westward angular distance, T, from the nucleus optocenter of P/2019 LD2 plotted as blue data points when the comet was observed at a −0fdg44 topocentric and target orbital plane angle with HST/WFC3 on 2020 April 1 UTC. The best-fit line in T versus FWHM space according to Equation (5) with V = 0.94 ± 0.11 m s−1 is plotted as an orange line.

Standard image High-resolution image

Neglecting projection effects, the FWHM of the tail gradually widened with T and was fit to the function

Equation (5)

from Jewitt et al. (2014), where V is the component of the ejection velocity perpendicular to the orbital plane, equal to ∼1 m s−1. We estimate that the perpendicular component of the ejection velocity scales with V ∼ 1 m s−1 ${(\bar{a}/{\bar{a}}_{0})}^{-1/2}$ where ${\bar{a}}_{0}=400$ μm (Jewitt et al. 2014).

3.4. Spectrum

The spectrum of P/2019 LD2 was extracted using a 7farcs4-wide region centered on the peak of the continuum's brightness. We compute the normalized reflectance spectrum of P/2019 LD2 taken with Keck/LRIS on 2020 August 19 UTC in the wavelength range between 400 nm and 1000 nm by dividing the P/2019 LD2 spectrum by our solar-analog spectrum and normalizing to unity at 550 nm. The resulting spectrum indicates a reddish to neutral coma color for P/2019 LD2, as seen in Figure 7. We measured a slope of ∼16%/100 nm between 480 and 760 nm and a flatter spectrum between 760 nm and 900 nm consistent with the photometric colors taken by LT on 2020 May 29 plotted over the LRIS spectra in Figure 7 for reference. Our spectrum shows no sign of C2 emission in the 505 nm to 522 nm range (Farnham et al. 2000) in the highlighted range in Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Figure 7. Visible-wavelength reflectance spectrum taken of P/2019 LD2 with the LRIS instrument on Keck I on 2020 August 19 plotted as blue dots. The error bars on the spectrum data points correspond to 1σ uncertainty. The spectrum has been normalized to unity at 550 nm, indicated by the orange cross. The spectrum presented was obtained by combining two spectra from the blue camera using the 600/4000 grism and the red camera using the 600/7500 grating with a 560 nm dichroic (Oke et al. 1995; McCarthy et al. 1998). The data have been rebinned and smoothed by a factor of 10 using an error-weighted mean. The spectral range of the cometary C2 emission line has been indicated by the yellow shaded area (Farnham et al. 2000). The spike in the spectrum at ∼560 nm is due to an artifact caused by the dichroic solution, and the spike at ∼760 nm is caused by the telluric H2O absorption feature in both the comet and solar-analog spectra. The data to reproduce our plot of the reflectivity spectrum of P/2019 LD2 are available at the following link: [link].

Standard image High-resolution image

We set an upper limit on the C2 gas production of P/2019 LD2 using the mean V-band continuum flux density of P/2019 LD2 using its measured 550 nm flux, fluxV = 1.52 × 10−15 erg cm−2 s−1 nm−1. The fractional 1σ continuum statistical uncertainty of our P/2019 LD2 spectrum in the range spanning 505 nm to 522 nm is 0.01, corresponding to a 3σ flux density${}_{{{\rm{C}}}_{2}}=2.13\times {10}^{-17}$ erg cm−2 s−1 nm−1 including a correction of 0.6 for slit losses. The 3σ upper limit to the flux in the 17 nm width of the C2 band is ${F}_{{{\rm{C}}}_{2}}\,\leqslant $ 3.62 × 10−16 erg cm−2 s−1. The 3σ upper limit on the number of C2 molecules projected within the 7farcs4 × 1farcs0 spectroscopic slit assuming that the coma is optically thin is

Equation (6)

where g(rh) is the fluorescence efficiency factor of the C2 spectral band at rh where g(1 au) = 2.2 × 10−14 erg s−1 radical−1 (A'Hearn 1982), which results in Nmol ≤ 1.27 × 1027 molecules.

We apply the assumptions of the Haser model (Haser 1957) to determine a coarse 3σ upper limit on the production rate of C2. The Haser model uses two length scales, the "parent" molecule species length scale, LP, and the "daughter" molecule species length scale, LD, to describe the distribution of the radicals. For C2 at an rh of 4.594 au, LP = 5.3 × 105 km and LD = 2.5 × 106 km (Cochran 1985). In addition, we assume the speed of the molecular gas is 0.5 km s−1, which is used to determine the residence time of the molecules in the projected slit (Combi et al. 2004). Using these assumptions with the Haser model, we find the 3σ upper limit to the gas production rate ${Q}_{{C}_{2}}\,\lesssim $ 7.5 × 1024 mol s−1, which is a similar limit to the measured ${Q}_{{C}_{2}}$ of other solar system comets at similar heliocentric distances (Feldman et al. 2004) and to the results of Licandro et al. (2020). Scaling our measured spectroscopic upper limit on the ${Q}_{{C}_{2}}$ gas production rate to a OH gas production rate using the median ratio of C2 to hydroxyl production rate for solar system comets (A'Hearn et al. 1995) results in an estimated spectroscopic upper limit of QOH ≲ 2.4 × 1027 mol s−1 and a mass-loss rate in water of ${{dM}}_{{H}_{2}O}/{dt}$ ≲ 80 kg s−1.

3.5. Orbital Evolution

In order to investigate the long-term dynamics of 2019 LD2, we simulated 27,000 clones of its orbit. The clone set is created by using 1000 three-dimensional locations using the positional uncertainties. The velocity uncertainties are accounted for by creating 27 clones in the three-dimensional velocity space at each positional location for a total of 27,000 clones. Orbital six-vectors were generated with uncertainties from the JPL Horizons Orbit Solution dated 2020 May 20 at 00:43:28 and set for the 2019 September 15 00:00 UTC epoch. In addition, we use the major gravitational components of the solar system (Sun, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune). The simulations were conducted using REBOUND (Rein & Liu 2012) with the hybrid MERCURIUS integrator (Rein et al. 2019). We ran two sets of integrations, a short-term set, integrated for 100 yr, and a long-term set for 1 × 107 yr. For each simulation set, we use a time-step size of 0.025 yr. For the long-term integrations, we output every 1000 yr and analyze the time at which the clones escape the solar system (distance from the Sun larger than 1000 au).

The short-term integrations replicate the previous work of Steckloff et al. (2020) and Hsieh et al. (2021). In the simulations, we find that the clones entered the Jovian region approximately 2.37 yr ago and are ejected from the region 8.70 yr in the future (see the top left panel of Figure 8 for a clone example). As was found previously, 2019 LD2 transitions from a Centaur, with an approximate semimajor axis of 8.6 au, to a Jupiter-family comet with a semimajor axis of 6.2 au, spending 11.0712 yr in the Jovian region (semimajor axis 5.2 au). In the long-term simulations (1 × 107 yr), we find that one-half of the clones escape the solar system in 3.4 × 105 yr and 78.8% of the clones escape the solar system within the first 1 × 106 yr, as seen in the bottom right panel of Figure 8. After ∼3.8 Myrs, 95% of the P/2019 LD2 clones have escaped.

Figure 8.

Figure 8. Top left panel: Jovian angle defined as the relative longitude between Jupiter and P/2019 LD2 as a function of time between −100 and 100 yr centered on 2019 September 15 UTC. Except for a brief period of time between −3 and 8 yr where the Jovian angle was ∼20°, the Jovian angle cycled between 0° and 360°. Top right panel: same as the top left panel except for the Jovian distance defined as the distance between P/2019 LD2 and Jupiter in Jovian Hill spheres (∼0.35 au) as a function of time. The local minimum in the Jovian distance occurred ∼2.77 yr ago with a distance of ∼0.50 Jovian Hill radius, or 0.17 au. Bottom left panel: same as the top right panel except for the Saturn distance defined as the distance between P/2019 LD2 and Saturn in Saturn Hill spheres (0.43 au). The local minimum occurs in ∼60 yr when P/2019 LD2 comes within ∼3.3 Hill radii or 1.42 au of Saturn. Bottom right panel: percentage of orbital P/2019 LD2 clones that have escaped the solar system (reached >1000 au from the Sun) per bin in duration of time. Each bin is ∼100,000 yr wide. Within the first million years of the simulation, ∼78.8% have escaped the solar system. By 10 million years, ∼95% have escaped the solar system.

Standard image High-resolution image

4. Discussion and Conclusions

From our observations spanning multiple observatories, transitioning comet P/2019 LD2 exhibits interesting features in comparison with other short-period solar system comets. P/2019 LD2 has a higher value of Afρ of 85–200 cm (A'Hearn et al. 1995) at a heliocentric distance between 4.7 and 4.6 au compared to other short-period comets at a similar heliocentric distance (Kelley et al. 2013; Ivanova et al. 2014; Bauer et al. 2015) and a kilometer-scale nucleus (Fernández et al. 2013), as well as reddish to neutral color properties (Jewitt 2015). The comet's morphology when observed over multiple epochs since 2019 April exhibits the presence of a tail, suggesting sustained activity versus an impulsive event. In addition, P/2019 LD2 has a moderate upper limit for the production of CO and CO2 of ∼1027 mol s−1 and ∼1026 mol s−1, respectively, based on our Spitzer observations taken in 2020 January. It is also very active when compared to 29P (although 29P is located at a slightly farther heliocentric distance of ∼6 au) on a per unit surface area basis (Afρ ∼ 150 cm/(1.8 km)2 ∼ 50 cm km−2 for P/2019 LD2 versus Afρ ∼ 1000 cm/(30.5 km)2 ∼ 1 cm km−2 for 29P; Ivanova et al. 2011), using the latest value for SW1's size from Schambeau et al. (2019). But this activity seems to produce quite large (∼100 μm), reddish dust particles containing copious amounts of water ice according to our work and that of Kareta et al. (2020b).

In addition to the morphology of the comet indicating sustained activity, the photometry of the comet observed between 2019 April and 2019 November by ZTF is consistent with the activity steadily increasing since late 2018 up through the end of 2019 and into 2020 as the comet nears its perihelion on 2020 April 10 UTC. The length of the tail in deep HST imaging as well as our inferred start date of activity of late 2018 implies that the coma consists of ∼100 μm-scale dust ejected at a relatively low velocity of ∼1 m s−1. Although this is roughly consistent with the escape speed of a nonrotating comet nucleus of radius ∼1.8 km as inferred by our observations, it is unlikely that the dust is being ejected exclusively by the rotational mass shedding suggested by the low ejection velocity (e.g., Ye et al. 2019; Lin et al. 2020). Rather, the increased activity of the comet as it nears perihelion suggests that dust is being transported by the sublimation, or that the activity is a product of both the sublimation of volatiles and rotational mass shedding.

The size of the active region on P/2019 LD2 of ∼0.4 km2 is too large to explain the low ejection velocity of the dust as for other comets with low dust ejection velocities whose activity is driven by the sublimation of volatiles (Jewitt et al. 2014). Subsequent observations of P/2019 LD2 to determine the rotation state of the comet will be necessary to understand if it is rotating near its critical rotation limit, indicating the role of rotational mass shedding in its activity or if the comet has the possibility of becoming rotationally disrupted in the near future or if it was disrupted in the recent past (Moreno et al. 2017; Vokrouhlický et al. 2017). Given the 4–5 au location of the comet during its recent epoch of activity, the distance at which water ice begins to sublimate (Meech & Svoren 2004), it is likely that the activity is being driven primarily by the sublimation of water ice. An additional possible mechanism may be the transformation of amorphous water ice into crystalline water, as has been suggested as an activity-driving mechanism for Centaurs (Jewitt 2009). It is possible for other volatiles such as CO to partially drive the activity of P/2019 LD2, as seen in other distant comets (e.g., Bolin et al. 2020b) and 29P (Gunnarsson et al. 2008), but the lack of detection of the activity at large heliocentric distances (Schambeau et al. 2020) seems to suggest that hypervolatiles are not the dominant drivers of the activity of P/2019 LD2. If the lack of hypervolatiles driving the activity of P/2019 LD2 is confirmed, it may suggest that P/2019 LD2 has spent a significant amount of time as a Centaur within 15 au of the Sun (Horner et al. 2004b), where these hypervolatiles may have had a greater chance to become depleted compared to water ice, which is nonvolatile at that distance.

Additionally, some comets show evidence of a strong transition between H2O-driven and CO-driven activity at heliocentric distances past ∼3.5 au, such as for comets 67P (Läuter et al. 2019) and Hale-Bopp (Biver et al. 1997). Our observation of the activity of P/2019 LD2 and its inferred H2O-driven activity at its heliocentric distance of ∼4.6 au at the time of our observations is seemingly at odds with the transition to CO-driven activity at larger heliocentric distances as observed for other comets. However, it has been shown that the shape and rotation pole orientation of comets can have a strong effect on the distance at which comet activity is driven by H2O. H2O-driven activity can increase at larger heliocentric distances for comet shapes and orientations deviating from a spherically shaped comet rotating perpendicular to its orbital plane (Marshall et al. 2019). Therefore, the inferred H2O-driven activity of P/2019 LD2 at its large heliocentric distance of 4.6 au could be explained by it having a nonspherical shape and significant obliquity, which has been shown to sustain H2O activity at these heliocentric distances in comet-activity models.

P/2019 LD2 is beginning to enter the region where water ice begins to appreciably sublimate at rates high enough that a patch of pure water ice in the surface would disappear on year-long timescales. The beginnings of mobilization of water ice for a weakly structured surface such as found on 67P (O'Rourke et al. 2020) could lead to the slow flaking off of large chunks of the loosest, weakest material that had never felt such stresses before. In this scenario, gas will evolve at low levels in order to drive dust off the object. The material driven off should be rich in water ice, as this ice is the last, most refractory ice expected in a cometary body before it is totally depleted of volatile ice. We then may expect to see P/2019 LD2's activity modulated by its motion toward or away from the Sun over an orbit similar to how the activity of Main Belt Comets are modulated as they travel inside or outside the 2.5 au water "ice line," where water ice boils furiously into vacuum (Hsieh et al. 2015a, 2015b); P/2019 LD2's activity could be modulated by its traversing the water ice turn-on line of activity. Future monitoring observations over the next years will determine if this is the case, as is suggested by the smoothly increasing Afρ toward perihelion values we find for P/2019 LD2; they do not appear to be describing an impulsive outburst.

In our long-term simulations (1 × 107 yr), we show the temporary nature of 2019 LD2. Up to 78.8% of our orbital clones escape in the first 1 × 106 yr. The half-life of the clones is approximately 3.4 × 105 yr. This is an order of magnitude smaller than the mean half-life of Centaurs (2.7 × 106 yr; Horner et al. 2004b) and more comparable to the lifetimes of Jupiter-family group comets of ∼5 × 105 yr (Levison & Duncan 1994).

Without a robust assessment of survey selection effects (e.g., Jedicke et al. 2016; Boe et al. 2019), it is difficult to assess the true population of comets in a temporary co-orbital configuration with Jupiter and transitioning between the Centaur and Jupiter-family comet populations (Sarid et al. 2019). However, we can use our estimated size of P/2019 LD2 in comparison with the population estimates of Centaurs in the transition region (Steckloff et al. 2020). Steckloff et al. (2020) predict that there are ∼40–1000 objects in the transition region with radius >1–3 km, and fewer if cometary fading is considered in the population estimate (Brasser & Wang 2015). Using these transition-object population estimates and our estimate of the radius of P/2019 LD2 of ∼1.8 km suggests that there are ∼100 objects the size of P/2019 LD2 in the transition region at any given time. Additional monitoring of P/2019 LD2 and objects like it in the gateway region will be required to understand their activity drivers and population.

The authors wish to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their help in revising this manuscript, which greatly improved its text.

This work is based on observations with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope obtained from the Data Archive at the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Incorporated, under NASA contract NAS5-26555. Support for program GO 16077 was provided through a grant from the STScI under NASA contract NAS5-26555.

This work is based on observations made with the Spitzer Space Telescope, which was operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with NASA.

This work is based on observations obtained with the Samuel Oschin Telescope 48 inch and the 60 inch Telescope at the Palomar Observatory as part of the Zwicky Transient Facility project. ZTF is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant No. AST-1440341 and a collaboration including Caltech, IPAC, the Weizmann Institute for Science, the Oskar Klein Center at Stockholm University, the University of Maryland, the University of Washington, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron and Humboldt University, Los Alamos National Laboratories, the TANGO Consortium of Taiwan, the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories. Operations are conducted by COO, IPAC, and UW.

The Liverpool Telescope is operated on the island of La Palma by Liverpool John Moores University in the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias with financial support from the UK Science and Technology Facilities Council.

This work was supported by the GROWTH project funded by the National Science Foundation under PIRE Grant No. 1545949.

Some of the data presented herein were obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership among the California Institute of Technology, the University of California, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The observatory was made possible by the generous financial support of the W. M. Keck Foundation.

The authors wish to recognize and acknowledge the very significant cultural role and reverence that the summit of Maunakea has always had within the indigenous Hawaiian community. We are most fortunate to have the opportunity to conduct observations from this mountain.

B.T.B., G.H., and F.J.M. acknowledge support from NASA with grant No. 80NSSC19K0780.

C.F. gratefully acknowledges the support of his research by the Heising-Simons Foundation (2018-0907).

M.W.C. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation with grant No. PHY-2010970.

This publication has made use of data collected at Lulin Observatory, partly supported by MoST grant 108-2112-M-008-001.

C.C.N. gratefully acknowledges the funding from MOST grant 104-2923-M-008-004-MY5.

The authors would like to acknowledge the helpful discussion of P/2019 LD2 with L. Woodney and Q.-Z. Ye.

This work has made use of data from the European Space Agency (ESA) mission Gaia (https://www.cosmos.esa.int/gaia), processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium (DPAC; https://www.cosmos.esa.int/web/gaia/dpac/consortium). Funding for the DPAC has been provided by national institutions, in particular the institutions participating in the Gaia Multilateral Agreement.

Facilities: Hubble Space Telescope - , Spitzer Space Telescope - , Keck I Telescope - , P48 Oschin Schmidt telescope/Zwicky Transient Facility - , Apache Point Astrophysical Research Consortium 3.5 m telescope - , Liverpool Telescope - , Lulin Optical Telescope - , Mount Laguna Observatory 40 inch Telescope. -

Software: Small Body Python, ZChecker, LPipe, REBOUND.

Footnotes

Please wait… references are loading.
10.3847/1538-3881/abd94b