This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.

Is Aluminum Useful in Ni-Rich Li-Ni-Mn-O Positive Electrode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries?

, , , , and

© 2021 ECS - The Electrochemical Society
, , Citation Ines Hamam et al 2021 Meet. Abstr. MA2021-02 351 DOI 10.1149/MA2021-023351mtgabs

2151-2043/MA2021-02/3/351

Abstract

The low cost and high specific capacity of Ni-rich cathode active materials have made them promising materials for affordable, high performance Li-ion batteries. However, increasing the Ni-content in the cathode results in lower cycling performance and lower thermal stability.1 Meanwhile, lithium nickel manganese oxides (Li-Ni-Mn-O) are also inexpensive materials that benefit from high thermal stability and high energy density due to their high operation potential.2 Although manganese improves the performance of Ni-based materials, it also enables more cation mixing and reduces the rate capability of the cathode

Al-doping of cathode materials, although it lowers the initial capacity of the cell, has shown to reduce changes in the lattice of the material during delithiation resulting in improved cycling stability. The presence of Al in the lattice also decreases the charge-transfer resistance by facilitating Li-diffusion.3

Although the presence of Al has proved its virtue in commercial cathode materials such as LiNixCoyAl1-x-yO2 (NCA) and LiNixMnyCozAl1-x-y-zO2 (NMCA) it has yet to be used commercially in Co-free systems. In this work, Li(NixMn1-x)O2 (NM) systems of 3 different particle sizes (3.5 μm, 13 μm and 16 μm) as well as their Al-doped counterparts, Li(NixMn1-x-yAly)O2 (NMA), were studied. Figure 1 shows that the array of layered materials used in this study were optimally synthesized to be stoichiometric, single-phase materials with minimal cation mixing. Half cells and full cells were then constructed to evaluate the effect of Al on cycling stability, Li diffusion measurements were made to study rate capability and accelerated rate calorimetry was used to compare thermal stability. This head-to-head comparison of Li-Ni-Mn-systems with and without Al dopant will determine the effectiveness of Al in Ni-rich, Co-free cathode materials.

References

  1. Li, H. et al. An Unavoidable Challenge for Ni-Rich Positive Electrode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries. (2019) doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b02372

  2. Dou, S. Review and prospect of layered lithium nickel manganese oxide as cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. 911–926 (2013) doi.org/10.1007/s10008-012-1977-z

  3. Wang, G. X., Zhong, S., Bradhurst, D. H., Dou, S. X. & Liu, H. K. LiAlδNi1-δO2 solid solutions as cathodic materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. Solid State Ionics 116, 271–277 (1999). doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(98)00351-8

Figure 1

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

10.1149/MA2021-023351mtgabs