The following article is Open access

Hysteresis of Transistor Characteristics of Amorphous IGZO TFTs Studied by Controlling Measurement Speed

and

Published 30 January 2015 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by ECS.
, , Citation Yi-Jung Chen and Ya-Hsiang Tai 2015 ECS Solid State Lett. 4 Q10 DOI 10.1149/2.0041504ssl

2162-8750/4/4/Q10

Abstract

We investigate the hysteresis in the transfer characteristic of amorphous indium-gallium-zinc-oxide thin-film transistor by controlling the sweep waveform of the gate voltage (Vg) provided by parameter measure unit. It is conventionally studied by double sweeping Vg with the default setup of the source measure units, which speed may vary with the current level. By manipulating the step time of sweeping Vg, we found that the response time of charge traps or donor-like states is in the range that overlaps with the conventional time step in the measurement and must be considered.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License (CC BY-NC-ND, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is not changed in any way and is properly cited. For permission for commercial reuse, please email: oa@electrochem.org.

Nowadays, amorphous indium-gallium-zinc-oxide (a-IGZO) thin film transistors (TFTs) attract the most attention owing to its many advantages like low temperature process (below 300°C) and high on/off ratio (∼106).1 In addition, it is highly transparent in visible light with transmittance due to its wide bandgap (∼3 eV). These properties open up to new applications such as transparent electronics, flexible electronics, and photo sensor.2,3 The degradation mechanism of stress induced instability412 and the hysteresis 8,1113 of the a-IGZO TFT have been extensively discussed. There are three commonly accepted mechanisms of degradation: (I) hole/electron trapping in the interface of gate insulator,48 (II) the creation of ionized oxygen vacancies (VO+ or VO2+),913 and (III) donor like defect creation in the IGZO channel.912 In most reports, the evolutions of the transfer characteristics were probably observed with the default setting of the Source Measure Units (SMU) in the semiconductor parametric analyzer. In the common setting, in order to measure the low current level accurately, the sweeping time of the gate voltage (Vg) is slowed down, which may induce excessive stress to influence the transfer curve of a-IGZO TFT. The Vg sweeping in measurement can affect hysteresis in two ways, namely, range and speed. The effect of sweeping range for Vg was discussed before.13 However, the effect from sweeping speed is not well mentioned. In this paper, the Vg sweeping for measuring the transfer curves is controlled to be fast and slow in dark or illumination, so that the threshold voltage (VTH) shift and hysteresis corresponding to the creation of ionized oxygen vacancies (VO+ or VO2+) and the interfacial traps can be well discussed.

Experimental

The a-IGZO TFTs in this work are based on the bottom-gate TFT devices with symmetrical source/drain (S/D) fabricated on the glass substrate. The shaped Ti/Al/Ti (50/200/50 nm) gate electrodes were capped with 400-nm-thick SiNx gate dielectric. The active layer of the TFT is 60 nm in thickness. The width and length are 20 μm and 5 μm, respectively. The detailed fabrication process is described elsewhere.14 Same TFT was used for all measurement. Before each measurement, TFT was put in vacuum for 24 hr and the transfer curve was checked to make sure its initial characteristics in dark is restored. Keithley 4200 semiconductor parametric analyzer is used to measure the electrical properties of the TFTs with controlled sweeping voltage waveform for the gate bias. The wavelength and the intensity of the light used for illumination are around 465 nm and 29000 lux (or 56.2 mW/cm2), respectively.

Results and Discussion

Fig. 1a shows the transfer curves of the a-IGZO TFT measured by SMU. The Vg is swept from −20 V to +20 V and then swept reversely from +20 V to −20 V with step of 0.5 V and drain voltage Vd of 10 V. The corresponding curves of simultaneously recorded time versus Vg are also plotted in the right axis of Fig. 1a. For the two time curves, the time taken in the measurement is automatically determined by SMU. It can be seen that, the sweeping speed in the on region for the two measurements is the same. It is further observed that, the step time in the off region is calculated to be 56 ms/0.5 V for the current range limit set at 100 nA, while it is 1003 ms/0.5 V for the current range limit of 100 pA. It takes longer time to measure the low drain current Id in the off region for the integral operation, even though it provides better resolution.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. The transfer characteristics Id-Vg measured by (a) SMU with automatically set sweep speed and (b) PMU with manually set sweep speed.

We would rather correlate the hysteresis to the sweeping step time in the off region than current range limit. By setting the current range limit, we can manipulate the sweeping speed from 1003 ms/0.5 V to 56 ms/0.5 V. For each measurement, the duration time of forward Vg sweeping in the off region (−20 V to −5 V) Toff is recorded and the voltage difference ΔV at drain current of 1 nA is extracted from the Id-Vg curves to represent the degree of hysteresis. The curve of ΔV versus step time in off region is plotted the inset of Fig. 1a. It is obviously seen that the clockwise hysteresis ΔV positively relates to the sweeping time. By extrapolating the curve, we can expect ΔV to vanish when step time is shorter than 21 ms/0.5 V. Such a fast measurement cannot be implemented by SMU. We need to use Parameter Measure Unit (PMU) to do the fast sweeping. Using PMU, we have not only fast acquisition time but also the freedom to set the Vg waveform. Fig. 1a can be replicated in substance by using PMU to set the exact step times to be 1000 ms/0.5 V and 50 ms/0.5 V for Vg < −5 V and the step time of 25 ms/0.5 V for Vg > −5 V, as shown in Fig. 1b. We observed the similar behaviors in hysteresis. Thus, we take these advantages in the following experiments.

Fig. 2 shows the Id-Vg curves of the a-IGZO TFT obtained by two different modes of sweeping Vg along with their corresponding Vg waveforms in dark and under illumination. In order to increase the sweeping speed, we sacrifice the resolution for the off current by selecting the higher current range limit of 1 mA. In both modes of sweeping Vg, the speed in the range from −10 V to +10 V is identical to be 0.01 ms/0.5 V. As for the ranges of Vg < −10 V and Vg > +10 V, the sweeping speeds in Mode A and B are 0.01 ms/0.5 V and 1 s/0.5 V, respectively.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. The transfer characteristics Id-Vg measured by PMU with different sweeping waveforms.

As shown in Fig. 2, the time duration in the on region for Mode B is 40 s, much longer than that for SMU with slower sweeping. However, no significant positive VTH shift is observed. It means that the effect of positive bias is less effective, which is consistent with the previous reports.7 Therefore, in the following discussion, we focus on the negative bias region.

The duration Toff in Mode A is 0.3 s. In the dark case, the absence of the hysteresis in Mode A is as expected. Under illumination, the hysteresis is significant even the sweeping speed is in the fast Mode A. It becomes more obvious in Mode B. The enhancement of hysteresis by illumination was also observed previously.11

The longer Toff can possibly leads to both more charges trapped and more VO2+ created under illumination. We wonder which one dominates the ΔV behavior. We know that the created VO2+ cannot recover to be uncharged immediately.9,11 If we do the successive measurements with very short interval, we can monitor how the accumulated VO2+ affect the VTH shift and ΔV. In the meantime, we can set different sweeping speed for each measurement to alter the ΔV for comparison. Therefore, a series of Id-Vg measurement with changing sweeping speed are arranged into sequence and conducted automatically by a preset program.

The results measured in the dark and under illumination are plotted in accordance to the sequence in Fig. 3. The step time in each measurement is the same and it is correspondingly indicated on the top of the figure. The series is designed to be in three stages. For the first 7 measurements, the step time is increased from 1 μs/0.5 V to 500 ms/0.5 V, which corresponds to the decrease in sweeping speed. Following them, the fast and slow ones are alternately arranged. Then, the step time is decreased back to 1 μs/0.5 V. For simplicity, the Id-Vg curves are not shown in this paper. Only the VTH extracted at Id = 1 μA as well as the respective difference ΔV between the VTH in forward and reverse sweeping to represent the hysteresis are plotted against the measuring sequence.

Figure 3.

Figure 3. VTH and ΔV variation is also extracted at drain current 1 μA with difference step time.

It is observed that VTH keeps shifting negatively along the measure sequence. We further observe that the VTH shift in a zigzag way for both sweeping in the dark case. It reveals the opposite hole and electron trapping induced by the negative and positive bias during the measurement, respectively.6,7

On the other hand, VTH shift under illumination is enhanced, because light can induce much more VO2+ to make VTH negatively shift and enhance hole trapping efficiency.7 The reverse VTH shifts more smoothly than the forward VTH. It can be explained by VO2+ overwhelm the positive VTH shift owing to electron trapping.7 As for the forward VTH, the shift get more apparent in the measurement with step time of 500 ms/0.5 V. It can be attributed to the hole trapping. To our surprise, the shift diminishes even in the contiguous measurement with the step time of 1 μs/0.5 V. This phenomenon cannot be explained by the accumulation of VO2+. It suggests that the dominant mechanism for the VTH shift in the forward sweep is either the hole trapping8 or the slow response of the donor-like states from VO2+.13

As shown in the lower part of Fig. 3, for both dark and illuminated cases, ΔV is determined by the step time only, no matter how the sequence is arranged and how VTH shifts. It further excludes the role of accumulation of VO2+ in ΔV. The dependences of ΔV on the step time in the dark and under illumination are shown in the inset of Fig. 3, wherein the ΔV acquired in one-shot and sequence of measurement are both plotted. The step time for ΔV to become negligible is 10 ms/0.5 V in dark, which is faster than the best of 56 ms/0.5 V provided by SMU. Under illumination, for the same step time, ΔV is raised because of more holes to be trapped or more generated donor-like states.

Conclusions

In this paper, we prove the Vg sweeping speed plays an important role in the hysteresis, mainly due to the duration in the off region. Based on this new discovery, the dependency of the hysteresis on the step time is characterized. It is found that the response time of charge traps or donor-like states is in the range that overlaps with the conventional time step in the measurement. The effect of sweeping speed must be considered in the study of the hysteresis for IGZO TFT.

Acknowledgments

This work was support in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology under MOST 103-2221-E-009-061.

Please wait… references are loading.