Paper The following article is Open access

Key pathways toward developing more ecoliterate individuals: a harmonious discourse analysis perspective

, and

Published 8 March 2024 © 2024 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd
, , Citation Changchen Ha et al 2024 Environ. Res. Commun. 6 035013 DOI 10.1088/2515-7620/ad27f9

2515-7620/6/3/035013

Abstract

This article explores key pathways to improve the Chinese people's ecological literacy (ecoliteracy) in ecolinguistics, and uses the framework of harmonious discourse analysis (HDA) to show how those pathways work. First, by reviewing HDA and ecoliteracy, we clarified the feasibility of their combined study. Then, a questionnaire was conducted among the inhabitants of one of China's most ecologically advanced cities, and the key pathways to improving ecoliteracy were determined. The results showed that there were eight factors that were considered to encourage the people to be more ecoliterate, falling into the categories of education, participation in activities, and documents and publicity. We also reviewed a variety of cases and demonstrated the significance of these pathways for ecoliteracy using the framework of HDA. We found that an ecoliterate individual can guide ecological practice better by following the general assumption of human-orientedness and the principles of conscience, proximity, and regulation. These results provide new ways for ecologists and linguists to explore ecological issues, not only broadening the linguistic pathways of ecoliteracy, but also enriching the content of HDA.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

1. Introduction

The increasing trend of cross-integration in various disciplines combined with global ecological issues affecting the sustainable development of humans and the natural environment (Ha et al 2022) has promoted the gradual emergence of the 'ecologicalization' of disciplines (Li and Yuan 1988), and enhanced discussion of ecolinguistics (also known as linguistic ecology) with interdisciplinary representations (Haugen 1972, Halliday 1990/2003, Stibbe 2021). However, a recent study showed that scholars in the natural sciences and social sciences place a different emphasis on language and ecological issues (Huang and Li 2021). In the natural sciences, this emphasis mainly extends from the framework of natural sciences (i.e., ecology), such as linguistic 'landsense' ecology, which is based on landsense ecology (Zhang et al 2021). But in the social sciences, linguists are more inclined to study ecological issues from a social science framework (Fill and Mühlhäusler 2001, Huang and Zhao 2021). So-called 'ecolinguistics' originated in the social sciences during the 1970s, mainly focusing on the correlation and interaction between any specific language and the surrounding environment (also called the Haugenian approach; Haugen 1972). The Hallidayan approach of ecolinguistics (or systemic ecolinguistics) was developed, focusing on the role of language in various environmental issues (Halliday 1990/2003, 2007). In 2021, Stibbe redefined ecolinguistics as 'the study of the role of language in the life-sustaining interactions of humans with other species and the physical environment' (Stibbe 2021: 203). At the same time, ecolinguistic issues have diversified (Huang and Zhao 2021), with more cross-disciplinary studies being reported in recent years (Steffensen 2018, Ha et al 2022).

This article is an extension of research from the Hallidayan approach of ecolinguistics. In this approach, ecological discourse analysis (EDA) focuses on the analysis of 'ecological discourse' and the 'ecological analysis' of discourse (Alexander and Stibbe 2014). The analysis of 'ecological discourse' refers to the analysis of discourses that involve ecological issues (e.g., climate change or environmental pollution), whereas the 'ecological analysis' of discourse refers to analysis within an ecological framework of other types of discourse (e.g., classism, growthism, and speciesism) (Halliday 1990/2003, Alexander and Stibbe 2014). Thus, research should start from the analysis of 'ecological discourse' and gradually expand to the 'ecological analysis' of discourse to promote the harmonious development of the entire ecosystem. Ecological philosophy (ecosophy) is an essential factor in the EDA, and describes a set of philosophical principles including ecological consideration (Naess 1995: 8). Ecolinguists hold various views of ecosophy, which can then lead to differences in the results of EDA. Moreover, Stibbe (2021: 211) has encouraged ecolinguists to explore the ecological wisdom of traditional cultures around the world, that is, when developing ecolinguistic research, researchers should pay attention to the localization of ecolinguistics. Harmonious discourse analysis (HDA) has gradually emerged based on localized EDA research in China. The proposal of HDA not only involves China's ecosophy (i.e., the coexistence between humans and the natural environment), but also considers traditional Chinese culture (i.e., Confucianism and Taoism) and development trajectory (i.e., China's aim of developing an ecological civilization) (Huang and Zhao 2019: 71, 2021: 7).

In addition, the Hallidayan approach of ecolinguistics not only includes the study of EDA (or HDA), but also many other key aspects, such as ecological literacy (ecoliteracy), ecological education, and ecological ethics (Huang and Zhao 2019). Among these, improving ecoliteracy is an important part of ecological education, and a main goal of ecolinguistics (Huang and Zhao 2019: 152). Given that ecoliteracy is also an interdisciplinary concept, it has been studied from different perspectives (Risser 1986, Orr 1992, Huang and Ha 2021, Ha et al 2022, 2023). However, there have been relatively few discussions on ecoliteracy from a social science perspective (Casper and Balgopal 2018, Casper et al 2021), particularly the study of the combination of HDA and ecoliteracy (Huang and Zhao 2019, 2021). Therefore, the purpose of the current study explores the key pathways to improve the ecoliteracy of the Chinese people. Based on a questionnaire to determine the effective pathways of ecoliteracy, it then discusses these pathways by means of HDA. The contribution of this study is aimed at identifying the key factors influencing ecoliteracy in the Chinese context, as well as improving HDA framework. Our specific research questions are: (1) What are the key pathways toward developing more ecoliterate individuals in the Chinese context? (2) How does the ecoliteracy approach proposed here reflect the core elements in the framework of HDA?

2. HDA and ecoliteracy

In the Chinese context, the definition of HDA is 'to promote harmonious relations between humans, humans and other species, humans and nature, and language and ecology' (Huang and Zhao 2021: 7). Its theoretical basis is systemic functional linguistics (Halliday and Matthiessen 1999, 2014), and its main concern is 'How do our ways of meaning affect the impact we have on the environment?' (Halliday 2007:14). Subsequently, to guide ecological discourse and behavior analysis, Huang (2017) proposed a general assumption (human-orientedness) and three research principles (conscience, proximity, and regulation) of HDA. These principles interact with each other and jointly promote harmony between humans and nature, the stability of society, and the protection of the ecology and environment (Huang and Zhao 2021: 10).

The framework of the HDA focuses on two levels: the micro level and the macro level (Huang and Zhao 2021: 13). On the micro level, the linguistic features of text or discourse in the narrow sense are analyzed (i.e., the structures and functions of language system). On the macro level, HDA indicates the discussion of text or discourse in a broader sense (i.e., various other semiotic, social, and material categories). This focuses on how language interferes with one's thoughts and behaviors, and even how language affects the eco-environment and ecosystem. In addition, ecoliteracy and ecological education can be considered another research field in the macro level (Huang and Zhao 2021: 15). Those three research principles can be used to carry out ecoliteracy research under the HDA framework, which is also the ultimate aim of HDA. In fact, the two levels of HDA are not completely separate because they can be combined to conduct research. For example, studying people's ecoliteracy (the macro level) is also an effective way to analyze the structure and function of the participants' discourse from the micro level.

What exactly does 'ecoliteracy' mean? As discussed above, different research fields have their own definitions and frameworks for ecoliteracy (Berkowitz et al 2005, Balgopal and Wallace 2009, Huang and Zhao 2019: 152–153; Pitman and Daniels 2020, Ha et al 2022). In general, we suggest that ecoliteracy reflects the integration and interaction between social systems (i.e., language system) and ecosystems (Risser 1986, Casper et al 2021). The definition and framework of ecoliteracy we apply here extend mainly from that used by Huang and Zhao (2019: 152-153), who summarized that the cultivation of ecoliteracy is to awaken people's ecological awareness, deepen their understanding of ecological crises, and encourage them to gain ecological knowledge actively. Thus, ecoliteracy refers to four dimensions: ecological knowledge literacy, ecological ethics literacy, ecological emotional literacy, and ecological behavioral literacy. We add a further factor (ecological awareness literacy) to form a 5 dimensional assessment framework of ecoliteracy in ecolinguistics. We have also designed specific second-level indicators for each dimension to provide a basis for the quantitative assessment of ecoliteracy (Ha et al 2022). For the definition of ecoliteracy used in this study, we consider it to be developed based on the people's environmental knowledge, values, and actions in response to environmental issues (i.e., the five dimensions detailed above). The key consideration is the development of ecological sustainable relationships between humans, humans and society, and humans and nature (Ha et al 2022).

Thus, the concepts of HDA and ecoliteracy are relatively similar, given the definitions discussed above. The main similarities are the following. First, they are both important parts of ecolinguistic studies. Second, they are applicable not only to the Chinese context, but also to related issues in other contexts (Zhao and Huang 2021). Third, they mainly discuss the issue of 'humans'. In the Chinese context, the concept of 'humans' refers to 'the people of a country' (Huang and Zhao 2021: 9). Finally, the definitions of these two concepts essentially coordinate the harmonious relationship among humans, society, and nature. Given these similarities, we can use the method of HDA to discuss ecoliteracy and to demonstrate HDA issues based on ecoliteracy.

Our article focuses on the ecoliteracy of the Chinese people, using the framework of the HDA. We begin at the macro level of HDA by discussing the key pathways that increase ecoliteracy, as determined by our quantitative assessment, such as themes, meanings of expressions, pictures, and ideas of the discourse that can be communicated (Neuman 2000, Gugssa et al 2021). From the micro level of HDA, we analyze the internal structure, function, or rhetoric of the discourse in these key pathways.

This study extends from HDA to the concept and framework of ecoliteracy. Given the lack of discussion of ecoliteracy in the social sciences literature compared with that of HDA, deriving the theme of ecoliteracy from HDA can highlight the close relationship between these two concepts in the social sciences, and provide a basis for the importance of ecoliteracy in ecolinguistics.

3. Methods

3.1. Data description and collection

Ways to improve ecoliteracy were determined by using a questionnaire. Our questionnaire had 60 questions and was evaluated for both its rationality and applicability (Ha and Dong 2023, Ha et al 2022, 2023). Among these questions, 41 were directly related to this research: 40 questions for the assessment of ecoliteracy (score range: 40–200) (see Ha et al 2022), and one question for the main factors governing the formation of ecoliteracy. With regard to the latter question, there were 20 options for the participants to choose from, and they were required to choose no more than ten options. These options were: (1) Laws, regulations, and policies related to the ecology and environment; (2) Governmental publicity and education; (3) Construction activities of the Chinese Communist Youth League (CCYL) and the Communist Party of China (CPC); (4) Publicity activities of thematic education in the community; (5) Classroom education; (6) Family education; (7) Outdoor education and activities (e.g., fishing, climbing, vacations, and forest park education); (8) Environmental protection activities; (9) Volunteer activities related to the ecology and environment; (10) Influential contacts (e.g., the words and behaviors of teachers, classmates, and friends); (11) Books or magazines related to the ecology and environment; (12) Lectures or reports related to the ecology and environment; (13) Mobile phone/computer software or official WeChat accounts; (14) Newspapers, TV shows, movies, and documentaries; (15) Commodity packaging; (16) Childhood experiences; (17) Campus life experiences; (18) Natural disasters or catastrophic events; (19) Independent research; and (20) Other factors.

The questionnaire was sent out to inhabitants of Guiyang City, which is one of the top-ten most ecologically advanced cities in China. We based our analysis on 988 valid completed questionnaires (collected from October, 2020 to May, 2021) to evaluate which of the 20 factors above were most important in the Chinese context. As one of China's top-ten ecologically advanced cities, Guiyang City not only has beautiful natural scenery, but there is also a relatively high level of ecoliteracy among its inhabitants. Although our survey cannot fully reflect the factors that improve ecoliteracy in the different regions of China, it can reflect to some extent how inhabitants have developed such a high level of ecoliteracy in terms of the Chinese context. Our research results provide a reference for improving the ecoliteracy of inhabitants in other areas of China and other countries.

3.2. Data analysis

Independent-sample t test and cross-tab statistics in SPSS 25.0 were used to analyze the total scores of each participant and their corresponding ecoliteracy factors to determine those factors that significantly influenced the ecoliteracy of the participants. There were five specific analysis steps.

The first step was to enter the total scores of the returned questionnaires and the selection of 20 factors into Microsoft Excel, and import them into SPSS 25.0. The second step used quartiles as the standard to divide the total scores into different groups. Participants with scores between 75% and 100% (total scores between 171 and 200) were considered to have a high level of ecoliteracy (N = 232), whereas those with scores between 0% and 25% (total scores between 105 and 150) were considered to have a low level of ecoliteracy (N = 236). The third step was to conduct a statistical analysis of the 20 factors using independent-sample t test. 'Select a certain factor' and 'not select this factor' were used as grouping variables, and the total score was used as the test variable. We then extracted the factors that had significant differences (at p < 0.05) in the total scores between the two groups. We also sorted and counted the number of the participants who chose factors with significant differences to understand the popularity of those factors. In the fourth step, we focused on participants in high-level group, and extracted the factors selected by more than half of those participants. These were combined with the factors extracted from previous step, and their overlap represented the key pathways toward developing more ecoliterate individuals. In the last step, we discussed the key pathways determined in the fourth step, and combined specific cases to illustrate the effectiveness of these pathways and how to further implement them toward a more ecoliterate individual.

In the selection of examples, we adhere to the principle of 'problem oriented' in ecolinguistics (Halliday 2009, Huang and Li 2021), that is, only examples that provide support for each pathway should be used. For each pathway, we used the framework of HDA to discuss these discourses, investigating their manifestation of human-orientedness and the principles of conscience, proximity and regulation. In particular, 'discourse' here could be assigned a text of any size, such as words, phrases, sentences, or even paragraphs and longer texts (Zhang and Wildemuth 2017, Gugssa et al 2021).

4. Results

4.1. Independent-sample t test

According to the data results in table 1, the average scores corresponding to the eight options that the participants selected were significantly higher than those unselected; that is, there were significant differences between the eight factors in terms of their ecoliteracy. The factors with significant differences ranked in descending order of average score difference (D) were as follows: Environmental protection activities (p = 0.000; D = 5.014); Governmental publicity and education (p = 0.000; D = 4.996); Family education (p = 0.000; D = 4.407); Laws, regulations, and policies related to the ecology and environment (p = 0.000; D = 3.832); Outdoor education and activities (p = 0.000; D = 3.707); Volunteer activities related to the ecology and environment (p = 0.000; D = 3.590); Classroom education (p = 0.008; D = 3.540); and Influential contacts (p = 0.003; D = 3.025).

Table 1. Specific factors in the formation of ecoliteracy for the participants.

No.Formative factorSelected (M ± SD)Not selected (M ± SD) t p Difference
1Environmental protection activities161.69 ± 15.414 (n = 638)156.68 ± 16.695 (n = 350)4.747.0005.014
2Governmental publicity and education161.38 ± 15.541 (n = 699)156.38 ± 16.731 (n = 289)4.493.0004.996
3Family education162.35 ± 16.432 (n = 442)157.94 ± 15.473 (n = 546)4.330.0004.407
4Laws, regulations, and policies related to the ecology and environment161.12 ± 16.372 (n = 677)157.29 ± 15.024 (n = 311)3.505.0003.832
5Outdoor education and activities161.44 ± 15.647 (n = 582)157.73 ± 16.388 (n = 406)3.593.0003.707
6Volunteer activities related to the ecology and environment161.78 ± 15.640 (n = 476)158.19 ± 16.250 (n = 512)3.533.0003.590
7Classroom education160.70 ± 15.496 (n = 769)157.16 ± 17.628 (n = 219)2.690.0083.540
8Influential contacts161.38 ± 15.088 (n = 510)158.35 ± 16.896 (n = 478)2.972.0033.025
9Independent research163.76 ± 19.523 (n = 46)159.73 ± 15.851 (n = 942)1.379.1744.034
10Lectures or reports related to the ecology and environment161.53 ± 14.479 (n = 180)159.55 ± 16.368 (n = 808)1.618.1071.979
11Publicity activities of thematic education in the community160.50 ± 16.311 (n = 498)159.32 ± 15.778 (n = 490)1.155.2481.180
12Books or magazines related to the ecology and environment160.51 ± 14.273 (n = 439)159.44 ± 17.341 (n = 549)1.073.2831.079
13Construction activities of the CCYL and the CPC160.20 ± 16.894 (n = 502)159.63 ± 15.144 (n = 486).559.577.570
14Newspapers, TV shows, movies, and documentaries159.87 ± 14.344 (n = 400)159.94 ± 17.128 (n = 588)−.071.943−.071
15Mobile phone/computer software or official WeChat accounts159.72 ± 14.159 (n = 472)160.09 ± 17.618 (n = 516)−.360.719.365
16Campus life experiences159.54 ± 14.592 (n = 185)160.00 ± 16.377 (n = 803)−.352.725−.461
17Commodity packaging159.14 ± 15.090 (n = 90)159.99 ± 16.151 (n = 898)−.477.633−.848
18Childhood experiences158.42 ± 16.666 (n = 90)160.06 ± 15.991 (n = 898)−.925.355−1.642
19Natural disasters or catastrophic events158.61 ± 14.156 (n = 286)160.45 ± 16.743 (n = 702)−1.753.080−1.839
20Other factors150.56 ± 10.477 (n = 9)160.00 ± 16.072 (n = 979)−1.759.079−9.445

4.2. Selection frequency

In figure 1, we analyzed the number of participants who chose the 20 options detailed in section 3.1 (i.e., the 20 main factors governing the formation of ecoliteracy). Combining these results with those of section 4.1, we found that, among the eight factors with significant differences in terms of their ecoliteracy, the number of participants choosing each one, from high to low, was: Classroom education (N = 769); Governmental publicity and education (N = 699); Laws, regulations and policies related to the ecology and environment (N = 677); Environmental protection activities (N = 638); Outdoor education and activities (N = 582); Influential contacts (N = 510); Volunteer activities related to the ecology and environment (N = 476); and Family education (N = 442).

Figure 1.

Figure 1. The selection frequency of factors forming participants' ecoliteracy.

Standard image High-resolution image

'Family education' was the least selected of the eight factors, although the average score awarded by the participants was the highest (162.35 ± 16.432, 81.18%). Among all 20 factors, 'Independent research' showed the highest average score (163.76 ± 19.523, 81.88%), although there was no significant difference (p = 0.174) compared with the other 19 factors. There was also no significant difference (p = 0.079) between the 'Other factors' who selected and unselected, with the factor being selected by only nine participants. This further illustrates that the 19 fixed factors listed in this questionnaire comprehensively account for ecoliteracy in China.

4.3. Distribution in high-level group and low-level group

The data results in table 2 indicated that more than 60% of participants who chose 'Independent research' (62.1%, N = 18) and 'Family education' (60.5%, N = 130) were in the high-level ecoliteracy group. In addition, more than 50% of participants who chose to take part in 'Environmental protection activities' (58.4%, N = 173); 'Volunteer activities related to the ecology and environment' (57.8%, N = 130); 'Influential contacts' (57.0%, N = 135); 'Lectures or reports related to the ecology and environment' (56.6%, N = 43); 'Outdoor education and activities' (55.6%, N = 154); 'Governmental publicity and education' (55.3%, N = 184); 'Laws, regulations and policies related to the ecology and environment' (54.6%, N = 178); 'Classroom education' (52.6%, N = 190); 'Publicity activities of thematic education in the community' (51.9%, N = 123); 'Books or magazines related to the ecology and environment' (50.5%, N = 96); and 'Construction activities of the CCYL and the CPC' (50.2%, N = 127) were also in the high-level ecoliteracy group.

Table 2. Distribution with different ecoliteracy factors in high-level and low-level groups.

No.Formative factor (Selected) GroupsTotal
   High-levelLow-level 
1Independent researchNumber181129
  Percentage62.1%37.9%100.0%
2Family educationNumber13085215
  Percentage60.5%39.5%100.0%
3Environmental protection activitiesNumber173123296
  Percentage58.4%41.6%100.0%
4Volunteer activities related to the ecology and environmentNumber13095225
  Percentage57.8%42.2%100.0%
5Influential contactsNumber135102237
  Percentage57.0%43.0%100.0%
6Lectures or reports related to the ecology and environmentNumber433376
  Percentage56.6%43.4%100.0%
7Outdoor education and activitiesNumber154123277
  Percentage55.6%44.4%100.0%
8Governmental publicity and educationNumber184149333
  Percentage55.3%44.7%100.0%
9Laws, regulations, and policies related to the ecology and environmentNumber178148326
  Percentage54.6%45.4%100.0%
10Classroom educationNumber190171361
  Percentage52.6%47.4%100.0%
11Publicity activities of thematic education in the communityNumber123114237
  Percentage51.9%48.1%100.0%
12Books or magazines related to the ecology and environmentNumber9694190
  Percentage50.5%49.5%100.0%
13Construction activities of the CCYL and the CPCNumber127126253
  Percentage50.2%49.8%100.0%
14Newspapers, TV shows, movies, and documentariesNumber8588173
  Percentage49.1%50.9%100.0%
15Mobile phone/computer software or official WeChat accountsNumber103108211
  Percentage48.8%51.2%100.0%
16Campus life experiencesNumber424587
  Percentage48.3%51.7%100.0%
17Commodity packagingNumber212445
  Percentage46.7%53.3%100.0%
18Childhood experiencesNumber202343
  Percentage46.5%53.5%100.0%
19Natural disasters or catastrophic eventsNumber5568123
  Percentage44.7%55.3%100.0%
20Other factorsNumber044
  Percentage0.0%100.0%100.0%
TotalNumber 232236468 
 Percentage 49.6%50.4%100.0% 

4.4. Summary

In summary, the overlap of factors identified in sections 4.1 and 4.2 above with those identified in section 4.3, reveal the factors that are most effective in the formation of ecoliteracy in China. The results show that the eight factors identified in sections 4.1 and 4.2 all appear in the 13 factors mentioned in section 4.3. Therefore, these eight factors could form the key pathways toward developing a more ecoliterate individual, as discussed in the following section.

5. Discussion

In this section, we discuss the context behind each of the eight factors (or pathways) revealed to be most important for establishing an ecoliterate Chinese individual. These can be placed into three categories: (1) education; (2) participation in activities; and (3) documents and publicity. All of these categories are of equal importance to improve ecoliteracy in China.

5.1. Education

Although education usually refers classroom education organized by a school (Pitman and Daniels 2020, Zahoor and Janjua 2020), numerous social practice activities that affect people's physical and mental development can also be classed as education, such as outdoor education and family education (Ha et al 2022). The ecological education emphasized herein refers to improving ecological knowledge and attitudes toward the eco-environment, thereby generating positive ecological behavior changes (Ertekin and Yüksel 2014), and improving ecoliteracy.

5.1.1. Classroom education

Classroom education is vital to the formation and development of ecoliteracy. Only through ecological education will the ecological awareness of the individuals be improved. Now more than ever it is necessary to understand environmental issues, risk assessment, the formulation of environmental plans, and how individual decisions affect the environment (Davidson 2010) to develop an ecoliterate individual. Thus, classroom education can transfer the theoretical knowledge of ecolinguistics to students, from elementary education, secondary education, higher education to adult education levels. Students at all stages of education should care about social changes, meet their own educational goals, make timely adjustments, and adapt to the needs of society as much as possible.

The example of classroom education comes from Unit 4 (wildlife protection; P25-P32) of New Senior English for China Student's Book 2 (Brooks et al 2007), entitled 'How Daisy learned to help wildlife' (appendix A). The text describes all the natural sights seen by Daisy in Tibet, Zimbabwe, and a thick rainforest as she rides on a 'flying carpet', which inspires Daisy's awareness of wildlife protection, and her resulting actions. In the framework of HDA, there are many contexts within this text that could highlight ecological issues to students and improve their ecoliteracy.

The text in appendix A depicts a place with a degree of wildlife protection (Zimbabwe), comparing the effects of protection measures with previous hunting behaviors. On the macro level, although elephants were endangered in the past, the government intervened, allowing people to 'hunt a certain number of animals' under specific conditions. This reflects the general assumption of human-orientedness, similar to 'If you exhaust the water and fish, you will not get any fish next year.' in traditional Chinese culture. This text provides a prerequisite: 'if they paid the farmers'. The principle of regulation is represented here, and resulted in 'our numbers are increasing'. 'Farmers hunted us without mercy' violates the principle of conscience, leading to 'We used to be an endangered species'. In addition, 'They said we destroyed their farms' follows the principle of proximity, indicating that farmers consider 'farms' to be more relevant to them than 'elephant'.

On the micro level, the most obvious example is the application of anthropomorphic rhetoric, such as 'it asked', 'said the elephant'. By providing point of view of the elephant, the distance between the animal and humans is reduced. In terms of participant composition, the participants in this text are 'Daisy', 'elephant', 'farmers', 'tourists', and 'government', with speech using the active voice. This encourages readers to consider any inappropriate behaviors to improve their ecoliteracy.

Thus, such classroom education is beneficial to both teachers and students in terms of their ecoliteracy. Although classroom discussions are unlikely to be from a HDA perspective, there will be significant use of new themes, words, and phrases, positively impacting the ecological awareness and ecoliteracy of teachers and students.

5.1.2. Outdoor education

Classroom education should also be extended outside the classroom, such as with field experience and social practice, to enable interactions with the ecology and environment (Huang and Zhao 2019: 150). There is a significant impact of outdoor education on the formation and development of ecoliteracy (Orr 1992). For educators, it is necessary to have a good level of professional knowledge, as well as other learning skills (e.g., ability to impart knowledge and engage students). Students must take outdoor education activities seriously, have the desire to improve their own ecoliteracy through outdoor education, and voluntarily devote themselves to this approach.

The example in appendix B is taken from a sign at a Chinese agricultural university that describes the local occurrence of Magnoliaceae, highlighting how such information can encourage outdoor education, leading to ecoliteracy. The university is on a large site, with a good ecology and environment, with the natural and cultural sceneries forming a 'Bauhinia Campus with numerous trees'. Thus, it is a suitable place for outdoor education.

Outdoor education makes the ecology and environment more tangible because students can interact directly with it. The sign in appendix B is placed directly in front of a group of Magnoliaceae, each identified by an individual sign that outlines the species, its appearance, characteristics, habitats, distribution, and usage. Such information will help inform those who read it, thereby improving their ecoliteracy.

On the macro level, there are seven Chinese words in artistic font ('Giant panda' in plants) on the left side of the sign in appendix B, and the font is larger than the other words. These seven words carry the main message of the sign, flagging to readers important information in a single glance, that is, these plants are as rare as giant pandas. Such a link is also reflected in the use of red font throughout the text. This reiterates the take-home message of the sign and also reflects the designer's compliance with the principle of conscience. The remaining text describes the Magnoliaceae in more detail, given that these are a relatively unfamiliar plant group to many people. Information provided includes the number of species, distribution area, area of origin, and endangered status, both in China and worldwide. The content is easy to understand and provides a learning opportunity for readers. If combined with outdoor lessons, such as from ecologists or botanists, the students would rapidly increase their knowledge of the Magnoliaceae. Highlighting the endangered species of Magnoliaceae would increase people's awareness of environmental protection, perhaps encouraging them to be more environmentally friendly in their daily lives. Thus, a macro-level approach can explain the relevance of outdoor education in this instance, and we do not consider its micro-level impacts here.

5.1.3. Family education

'Family' is a center of educational practice, where people give most wholly and unreservedly of themselves (Greenwalt 2021). Although there is no clear and unified definition of family education, according to traditional concepts, it usually refers to the education of children (or related minors) by their parents (or other adults). However, family education also includes various activities of mutual influence and education among all family members. Family education is not only the foundation of, but also can have a supplementary and extended role in, school education and social education. The main purpose of family education is to guide the educated to form a good awareness of how to behave, how to do things, how to learn, and how to get along with others. This could include ecological awareness, ecological behavior, and ecoliteracy.

Appendix C provides an example of original text from the children's book Amazing Animal Journeys (Packham 2016) and its Chinese translation (Packham and Fan 2020: 21–22). Here, we consider the effect of family education on the consideration of the text in appendix C from the perspective of HDA.

Appendix C contains both text and images, thus appealing to both adults and children, given that the latter might not fully understand the intended message from the text alone. The first paragraph talks about the migration of birds (blackcaps) in winter and explains the reason for changes in their migratory destination. The second paragraph describes how blackcaps migrate home to build nests when spring arrives. The third paragraph presents the consequences of climate change, especially the impact on global animal migration. In terms of images, the content changes from a snowy (winter) scene in the upper left corner to a spring scene in the lower right corner. The blackcaps are also pictured flying to the warmer from the cooler area. The grandmother and children in the illustration are pictured enjoying a picnic and the arrival of the blackcaps, providing an image of the harmonious coexistence between humans and the natural environment. This example directly embodies the principle of conscience. At the macro level, humans enjoy the unexpected arrival of blackcaps (bottom right), but should also realize that the global climate is changing (the text part). At the micro level, the use of 'journey' in the text adopts a anthropomorphic rhetorical technique, which links the migration of these birds more closely with human experiences.

However, although the objective facts of climate change are acknowledged, the example does not explain the negative effects brought about by climate change, such as the fact that the blackcaps 'survive better than other birds that fly south'. It also hints at the positive impact of climate change on the blackcaps. Family education is particularly important at this point, because when parents explain the example to their children, their value orientation, knowledge background, ideology, and ecoliteracy will form their own understanding of this example, leading to their children becoming more ecoliterate.

To fully illustrate the impact of this discussion, during the interview phase of our study, we interviewed an adult from each of the high-level and low-level ecoliteracy groups in Guiyang City. The main purpose was to determine their understanding of the example in appendix C and how they would explain the example to their children. The results showed that, although the inhabitant in the low-level group would explain the text to their children, an in-depth discussion of the impacts of climate change on animal migration was beyond their level of understanding. In addition, the interviewee only paid attention to the number of characters, the number of animals and the seasons depicted in the illustration, without considering the characters' facial expressions, actions, and images of living in harmony with nature. By contrast, although the inhabitant of the high-level group was unable to fully explain the concepts in the illustration and text to their children, the level of understanding and explanation was higher compared with the former interviewee, reflecting the higher level of ecoliteracy in this group.

5.2. Participation in activities

People can benefit significantly in terms of their ecoliteracy and physical fitness by participating in ecologically related activities. Many studies have confirmed the positive effects of contact with the natural environment on health and well-being (Kellert 2012, Pitman et al 2018a, 2018b, Rudd et al 2020). Here, we discuss three types of activity: outdoor activities, environmental protection activities, and volunteer activities. Our aim was to determine the significance of these activities in terms of people's ecoliteracy from the perspective of the framework of HDA, and show how ecoliteracy can be improved through such activities.

5.2.1. Outdoor activities

Outdoor activities are often associated with exercising, relieving stress, and enhancing immunity. In addition, participating in outdoor activities can also improve ecoliteracy, whereby participants can learn about the natural environment in which they live and their relationship with nature (Sebba 1991, Fjørtoft and Sageie 2000, Louv 2005). As Sebba stated (1991: 416), the nature seen from indoors through a window or in terms of man-made environments (e.g., astroturf or artificial ski resort) is fundamentally different from the actually experiencing nature (Pitman et al 2018a). Most people participate in some form of outdoor activity, such as common daily activities, including running, playing football or basketball, climbing, and fishing, as well as more extreme activities, such as camping, climbing, diving, and surfing. Pitman et al (2018a) used a case study from South Australia to show a significant link between the time spent outdoors and the level of ecoliteracy shown by local adults. Our ecoliteracy research also clarified the significance of outdoor activities in terms of people's ecoliteracy.

To discuss the impact of outdoor activities on ecoliteracy in more detail, we conducted a brief interview with a college student, who played football on the sports field of a Chinese university. Their responses are detailed in appendix D. In the interview, we focused on the information provided by the participant about the effects of outdoor activities on the level of ecoliteracy, reflecting a macro level of HDA. At the macro level, the participant discussed outdoor activities from a human perspective, which is in line with the assumption of 'human-orientedness'. The participant also fully affirmed the significance of outdoor activities to improve ecoliteracy and to promote the protection of the environment. This reflects their conscience and also follows the principle of conscience. We agree with the participant's point of view that exposure to real plants, sunlight, breeze, and so on will stimulate real emotion; grass growth and color changes will also stimulate the desire to explore plants and extend ecological knowledge, which in turn stimulates the awareness of environmental protection. Thus, over time, ecoliteracy will significantly improve.

5.2.2. Environmental protection activities

The second type of activity that has a positive influence on the formation of ecoliteracy are environmental protection activities, which can be carried out indoors or outdoors. Those held indoors are mostly related to theoretical knowledge learning or simulation activities, although can form an important part of outdoor activities. In addition, environmental protection activities and education, especially outdoor education, are also closely linked. There are different ways in which such activity can promote ecoliteracy, such as through people's working environments, hobbies and other leisure pursuits, either alone or in groups. Such activities promote ecoliteracy even if they do not focus specifically on 'education' (Pitman and Daniels 2020). Typical locations that can provide environmental protection activities include forest parks, zoos, botanical gardens, nature reserves, and so on.

In China, there are many specific areas that can realize environmental protection activities, such as Guiyang Forest Park and the National Urban Wetland Park of Huaxi in Guiyang, and similar areas in other Chinese cities. It can be complicated to provide environmental protection activities. We do not have the conditions for holding this kind of activities temporarily. However, it is generally accepted that the level of ecoliteracy can be increased by participating in environmental protection activities, as reported in both China and elsewhere (e.g., Pitman et al 2018a, Hammarsten et al 2019). Therefore, we use the example of an environmental protection activity in Holma Forest Garden in Sweden (Hammarsten et al 2019) to analyze the ecoliteracy value provided at the macro level of HDA.

This example was a 1-day forest park education activity for 28 children aged 7–9 years old, who reported their ecoliteracy experience through walk-and-talk conversations and informal interviews after the activity. Hammarsten et al (2019) summarized the participants' experiences in terms of three aspects: practical competence (e.g., planting skills), learning to coexist and care (i.e., how coexist with living organisms), and biological knowledge and ecological understanding (i.e., how trees and flowers produce oxygen, which we then breathe). Considering these aspects from the macro level of HDA, the comments 'We cannot survive without flowers and trees, because these plants can absorb carbon dioxide and emit oxygen for people to breathe' and 'picking herbs for their lunch salad, cooking food...', embody the general assumption of 'human-orientedness' at first. Thus, an important aspect of growing plants is that they aid human well-being and survival, regardless of what they are grown specifically for (e.g., crops versus ornamental plants). Second, phrases such 'do not destroy the plants...', 'mustn't shout', 'not to litter' and other messages reflect the principle of conscience, with participants learning how to become a person with conscience. In addition, some participants had been afraid of various species (e.g., spiders), but learned to live in harmony with them after the activity, which is, to some extent, a manifestation of the principle of proximity.

5.2.3. Volunteer activities

Generally, a 'volunteer' can be summarized as someone who voluntarily contributes their personal time and energy to provide services for the promotion of human development, social progress, and social welfare without material remuneration. There are many different types of volunteer, such as community volunteers, conference volunteers, environmental protection volunteers, and online volunteers. Participating in volunteer activities has many benefits, some of which (e.g., cardiovascular health) are more obvious than others. Environmental protection volunteers will gain ecological knowledge and skills, enrich their life experiences, strengthen their sense of social accountability, and learn to work as a team; as well as improving their ecoliteracy, they will also contribute to environmental protection (Ryan et al 2001, Pitman et al 2018a). Various studies have shown that volunteering for environmental protection activities is important in the formation and improvement of ecoliteracy (Pitman et al 2018a, 2018b, Pitman and Daniels 2020).

During our ecoliteracy survey, we selected one respondent from the high-level ecoliteracy group who had participated in voluntary environmental protection activities at a high frequency over the previous 5 years. His/Her responses to our interview are detailed in appendix E.

The results of the interview reveal how participating in volunteer activities related to environmental protection improves ecoliteracy. Here, we further discuss his/her responses from the macro level of HDA. The respondent focused on the value of 'people' and the well-being of humans, that is, improvements in ecoliteracy and being in harmony with the natural environment are of the most important significance to humans. This embodies the general assumption of human-orientedness. Further questioning about the harmonious coexistence between humans and the natural environment revealed the interviewee to have a conscience and a high level of ecoliteracy, which indicates that he/she followed the principle of conscience in the framework of HDA.

5.3. Documents and publicity

Here, we discuss the practical significance of documents and publicity related to ecology and environment in terms of improving ecoliteracy, focusing on Laws, regulations and policies; and Governmental publicity and education. We highlight the influence of national and social interventions on the improvement of ecoliteracy. Contributions at the social level (i.e., community publicity) also stem from following laws, regulations, and policies at the national level. Therefore, discourse at the national and/or government level is the main focus in this subsection.

5.3.1. Laws, regulations, and policies

In 1989, in accordance with new development needs, the 15th session of the United Nations (UN) Environment Programme Governing Council passed the 'Declaration on Sustainable Development'. In 1992, the UN Conference on Environment and Development adopted an agenda related to global sustainable development, 'Agenda 21', which required all countries to formulate relevant development strategies and countermeasures based on their actual conditions. In 2000, at the UN Millennium Summit, countries discussed the importance of ensuring environmental sustainability as part of the United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), and planned to incorporate the principles of sustainable development into national policies and programs. In 2015, after the MDGs expired, the UN continued to propose Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to guide global development work from 2015 to 2030, and to promote progress of the sustainable development agenda from all aspects. However, each country attaches different degrees of importance to ecological issues and strives to find solutions to them at all levels (especially legislation), such as the 1955 Air Pollution Control Act in the USA, the 1956 Clean Air Act in the UK, the 1979 Environmental Protection Act in China, and the 1987 Planning and Environmental Act in Victoria, Australia. If individuals can strengthen their learning of these laws and regulations, it will have a positive impact on their thinking, awareness, behavior, and even literacy regarding ecological issues.

In China, ecological issues have always been a part of the discussion in economic, political, cultural, and social development; however, as the issue has become increasingly serious, it is now one of the most important issues in national development. In 2012, the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (NCCPC) included the construction of ecological civilization in the overall approach of promoting economic, political, cultural, social, and ecological progress. Then, the basic concepts of 'harmony between human and nature' and 'a community with a shared future for mankind' were put forward. These indicate that humans cannot exist independently of nature, and that the relationship between them is dialectical and unified, promoting harmony between humans and the natural environment from the perspective of national strategies. We selected typical ecological-related discourses explicitly mentioned in the report of the 18th NCCPC (VIII. Making Great Efforts to Promote Ecological Progress), and discuss here the value of ecoliteracy improvement from the macro level of HDA.

In appendix F, we further verified the impact of ecologically related regulations and policies at the national level on the ecoliteracy of the Chinese people. From the macro level of HDA, on the one hand, the statements 'Promoting ecological progress is ... vital importance to the people's well-being and China's future' and 'create a sound working and living environment for the people, and contribute our share to global ecological security' focus on the significance of the construction of ecological civilization for human survival and development, and embody the general assumption of human-orientedness. On the other hand, for individuals, these regulations and policies at the national level can guide people to increase their ecological awareness, reasonable ecological behavior, and ecoliteracy; however, such forms of discourse have strong constraints. For example, the use of 'must' and 'should' embodies the principle of regulation in the framework of HDA and restricts people's behavior to a certain extent. If we analyze this approach from the perspective of policy makers, it can be seen that they have followed the principle of conscience in the framework of HDA, that is, China must strive to 'address the root cause of deterioration of the ecological environment so as to reverse this trend' through specific policies, concepts, and behaviors.

5.3.2. Governmental publicity and education

There are various ways to improve public ecoliteracy by means of Governmental publicity and education, which can be achieved through various media, including news reports, leaflets, social media, radio, television, posters, adverts, and so on, with an ecological theme. Of these, we consider video-based approaches to be the most effective in engaging the people in the environment from a government perspective. Once the people come to understand the ecological meaning conveyed by such videos, they might begin to reflect on their behavior in life and improve their own ecoliteracy.

The example used here is a video of a Network News Broadcast promoted on the Weibo website on October 4, 2021, entitled 'Protecting Diversity and Building a Community in Life of Humans and the Natural Environment' (Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People's Republic of China 2021). Given the large amount of information contained in the video, we focus here on the elements that are conducive to improving ecoliteracy from the macro level of HDA.

The video is 5 min-long and comprises the opening remarks by the host, three interviews with the people involved with ecological or ecological civilization research, and narrated images. The main aim is to show China's biodiversity conservation achievements (e.g., increases in the number of green peacocks, Asian elephants, etc.). The video contains significant amount of ecological knowledge, such as names and numbers of various animals and plants, as well as their appearance. Thus, the video can encourage people to develop a more in-depth understanding of these animal and plant species. In addition, the dense forests, clear rivers, blue skies, and white clouds shown in the video could encourage the people to yearn for such a natural environment, directly affecting their ecological awareness and ecological emotions, and possibly improving their ecoliteracy.

From the macro level of HDA, the host's opening remarks defined 'we' (the Chinese population or humans in general) as 'participants, contributors, and leaders in the construction of global ecological civilization', and proposed that we should 'protect in development, develop in protection, and build a harmonious and beautiful home (a community in life of humans and the natural environment)'. This embodies the general assumption of human-orientedness, because humans need to both protect the environment and develop economies; without the former, the latter is not possible. In addition, the increased protection of biodiversity, to significant effect, fully embodies the principle of conscience in the framework of HDA, and realizes the harmonious coexistence between humans and other species. This is summarized by the final frames of the video: 'a beautiful picture of the harmonious coexistence of humans and the natural environment is now unfolding in China'.

6. Conclusion

In previous work, we discussed in detail the internal structure of ecoliteracy from the perspective of ecolinguistics. An ecoliterate person has greater ecological knowledge, ecological awareness, ecological ethics, ecological emotions, and ecological behavior (Ha et al 2022). In the current study, we used the HDA framework in ecolinguistics to discuss ecoliteracy improvements in the Chinese context, revealing the general assumption of human-orientedness, and the principles of conscience, proximity, and regulation as ways to improve ecoliteracy. These two approaches above to discussing ecoliteracy are complimentary, in that an ecoliterate person can follow one general assumption and three research principles from the perspective of HDA, while showing good levels of the five aspects of the internal structure of ecoliteracy. According to the research questions, the main findings of this study are as follows:

Firstly, by applying quantitative research methods, there are eight important factors for improving the level of ecoliteracy in China, and all of them could be divided into three categories for discussion using the framework of HDA. These eight factors refer to (1) Environmental protection activities; (2) Governmental publicity and education; (3) Family education; (4) Laws, regulations, and policies related to the ecology and environment; (5) Outdoor education and activities; (6) Volunteer activities related to the ecology and environment; (7) Classroom education; and (8) Influential contacts. They are distributed in three categories, including (1) Education; (2) Participation in activities; and (3) Documents and publicity.

Secondly, all the above three types of approach analyzed in this article are effective in improving ecoliteracy, and reflect many elements in the framework of HDA. The approaches that appear most frequently are the general assumption of human-orientedness and the principle of conscience. This is because ecoliteracy is an intrinsic quality of humans, and the ecoliteracy we want to cultivate or improve refers to humans being able to spontaneously and actively protect the eco-environment and solve ecological problems. Thus, it is the direct manifestation of a person with a conscience.

However, the methods and conclusions here still need to be analyzed and verified again in the next stage of research by expanding the sample size of the questionnaire or combining the questionnaire with an interview, because the factors determining the development of ecoliteracy are complicated. It is not simply a piece of text, a picture, or a video, but a long-term process that needs to be internalized and to form slowly. Therefore, improvements in ecoliteracy are not limited to these three pathways but can stem from all aspects of daily study, work, and life. This article does not specifically reveal the importance of these three pathways, but rather the need to improve one's level of ecoliteracy. We also encourage the people to use more effective pathways to improve their own ecoliteracy. In addition, based on specific case discussions, we also demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of applying the framework of HDA to the study of ecoliteracy, because it can reveal the level of ecoliteracy content of different sources. This implies that other aspects of research on the combination of HDA and ecoliteracy require further exploration.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to all the people who helped complete this research and to the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions for improving the manuscript.

Data availability statement

The data cannot be made publicly available upon publication because no suitable repository exists for hosting data in this field of study. The data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request from the authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in this study.

Ethical approval

This research was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Foreign Studies, South China Agricultural University.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (sub project) (No. 2020YFB1406702-3).

Author contributions

CH, YC and SD contributed to the study conception and design. CH and SD participated in material preparation, data collection and analysis. CH wrote the first manuscript draft. YC and SD helped revise and improve the manuscript draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Appendix A

Daisy turned around and found that she was being watched by an elephant. 'Have you come to take my photo?' it asked. In relief, Daisy burst into laughter. 'Don't laugh' said the elephant. 'We used to be an endangered species. Farmers hunted us without mercy. They said we destroyed their farms, and money from tourists only went to the large tour companies. So the government decided to help. They allowed tourists to hunt only a certain number of animals if they paid the farmers. Now the farmers are happy and our numbers are increasing. So good things are being done here to save local wildlife.' (paragraph 2, p. 26, New Senior English for China Student's Book 2, Brooks et al 2007)

Appendix B

A sign at a Chinese agricultural university entitled 'Giant panda' in plants -- China: 'Magnoliaceae Kingdom' (植物中的大熊猫——中国:'木兰王国'). Here we only list the text of the sign translated by the authors. If a reader needs additional information, please contact the corresponding authors.

There are ∼300 species of Magnoliaceae in 17 genera in the world, mainly distributed in eastern and southeastern Asia, southeastern North America, Central America and South America.

There are 11 genera and 176 species of Magnoliaceae in China. Yunnan, Guangxi, Guangdong, Hainan, Guizhou in southwest China and their neighboring areas are the 'modern distribution centers' and 'diversity preservation centers' of Magnoliaceae.

China is the country with the richest resources of Magnoliaceae, and is a veritable 'Magnoliaceae Kingdom'. Numerous ancient sporopollen fossils and the discovery of large plant fossils suggest that Magnoliaceae originated in China.

132 species of Magnoliaceae are severely endangered.

Data from the National Forestry Administration of China indicate that the Magnoliaceae is the family with the highest proportion of threatened angiosperms (67% threatened).

Appendix C

An original text from the Children's book Amazing Animal Journeys (Packham 2016). If a reader want to obtain the original picture, please refer to the book or its Chinese version (Packham and Fan 2020: 21–22).

Until recently many birds would fly to Africa for the winter. However due to climate change, some birds such as BLACKCAPS from central Europe now visit Britain.

In spring blackcaps that spend the winter in Britain return home first, get the best spots and survive better than other birds that fly south.

The changing climate looks like it will have a big effect on migration all over the world ... maybe in your lifetime some animals will stop travelling altogether and others will start their own remarkable journeys!

Appendix D

A brief interview with a college student.

Q: Are you willing to participate in outdoor activities?

A: Of course.

Q: What outdoor activities do you usually like to participate in?

A: Running, walking, and playing basketball and football.

Q: What do you think are the benefits of outdoor activities?

A: To strengthen the body and relieve stress.

Q: Do you think that participating in outdoor activities can be connected with the ecology and environment? Will it affect your level of ecoliteracy?

A: You are right. The two are related and will have a great impact on my level of ecoliteracy.

Q: Could you please take football as an example to explain your response in detail?

A: Okay, for example, when I play football, I prefer to play football on a real grass field outdoors than on indoor football fields. This is because I am not only playing football on the grass outdoors, but can also feel the wind blowing, the sun's rays, and the temperature, smell, and feel of the grass, and so on. When I see the beauty of the natural environment, it will encourage my feelings for nature and the desire to protect the eco-environment. This is not felt at all indoors. In fact, there is another aspect that I think is very important. Can I elaborate on it?

Q: Yes please.

A: I think there are also differences in the choice of venues for playing football and running on outdoor sports fields. For example, there are more plastic tracks (astroturf) in school sports grounds. Although this has some benefits, it is not conducive to the formation of people's ecoliteracy; for example, the astroturf will not change significantly with the seasons as real grass does.

Appendix E

A brief interview with a respondent from the high-level ecoliteracy group.

Q: Which volunteer activities related to environmental protection have you mainly participated in during the past 5 years?

A: I have volunteered for Eco Forum Global Guiyang, for Arbor Day activities, and so on.

Q: Could you please talk about the significance or value of participating in this type of volunteer activity?

A: I think that, although such activities are good for both humans and nature, humans are the bigger beneficiaries. The significance for humans lies in the ability to learn ecological knowledge, enhance ecological awareness, guide ecological behavior, and develop our ecoliteracy. The significance to the natural environment lies in the ecoliteracy of humans, which affects the protection of the environment, realizes the harmonious coexistence between humans and the natural environment, and supports sustainable environments for future generations.

Q: Could you please take the specific volunteer activities you listed above as examples to elaborate?

A: Of course. Let me talk about participating in the volunteer activities of Eco Forum Global Guiyang. For example, at the 2018 annual meeting, the theme was 'Towards a New Era of Ecological Civilization: Ecological Priority and Green Development'. Through this forum, we promote multiparty cooperation and aim to realize the construction of a global ecological civilization. Volunteers have a role in assisting the smooth completion of the meeting. Before the meeting is held, there is relevant training, not only to understand volunteer service, but also to master knowledge related to the theme of the meeting (ecological civilization). During the meeting, volunteers can also gain ecological understanding through the multi-party communication process, which will have a direct positive impact on volunteers' ecological awareness. When people start to learn to reflect and practice ecological behaviors, they will eventually become ecoliterate.

Q: Is there any difference between the volunteer activities of Arbor Day and Eco Forum Global Guiyang?

A: Yes, they are very different, although their ultimate goal is to have a positive impact on people's views and behaviors on ecological issues. In other words, it is good for the improvement of the level of ecoliteracy you mentioned. I think that the volunteer activities of Arbor Day might have a more obvious effect on improving the level of ecoliteracy, because such activities are truly experienced and practiced in nature. The volunteer activities of Eco Forum Global Guiyang are mostly carried out indoors, and might result in faster improvements on a more theoretical level.

Appendix F

The English translation is from 18th NCCPC in Xinhua.

Promoting ecological progress is a long-term task of vital importance to the people's well-being and China's future. Faced with increasing resource constraints, severe environmental pollution and a deteriorating ecosystem, we must raise our ecological awareness of the need to respect, accommodate to and protect nature. We must give high priority to making ecological progress and incorporate it into all aspects and the whole process of advancing economic, political, cultural, and social progress, work hard to build a beautiful country, and achieve lasting and sustainable development of the Chinese nation.

We should remain committed to the basic state policy of conserving resources and protecting the environment as well as the principle of giving high priority to conserving resources, protecting the environment and promoting its natural restoration, and strive for green, circular and low-carbon development. We should preserve our geographical space and improve our industrial structure, way of production and way of life in the interest of conserving resources and protecting the environment. We should address the root cause of deterioration of the ecological environment so as to reverse this trend, create a sound working and living environment for the people, and contribute our share to global ecological security.

Please wait… references are loading.