Paper The following article is Open access

Reliability sensitivity analysis with subset simulation: application to a carbon dioxide storage problem

, and

Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd
, , Citation S Xiao et al 2019 IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 615 012051 DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/615/1/012051

1757-899X/615/1/012051

Abstract

Reliability sensitivity analysis (RSA) is a sensitivity analysis to measure the effect of modelling parameters on the predicted reliability of a system. It can be used for reliability-based design, safety management, etc. The output-classification-based version of RSA compares the failure-conditional probability density function (PDF) of model parameters with their unconditional PDF to measure sensitivity. The main challenge is to estimate failure-conditional PDFs. Usually, these PDFs can be estimated through the failure samples obtained by Monte Carlo simulation. However, practical systems usually have a small failure probability. For such cases, the brute-force Monte Carlo simulation requires a larger number of samples to obtain enough failure samples. Therefore, the computational cost is very high. In this paper, we propose to use subset simulation to estimate the output-classification-based reliability sensitivity index. Subset simulation introduces a series of intermediate failure events which are easier to sample from, and then iteratively samples in each constrained failure region until the target failure event is reached. Compared to brute-force Monte Carlo simulation, subset simulation samples in a direction towards the target failure domain. Therefore, the failure samples can be obtained more efficiently. We apply subset simulation to perform RSA for a carbon dioxide storage benchmark problem. We show that subset simulation can estimate the output-classification-based reliability sensitivity index more efficiently compared to brute-force Monte Carlo simulation.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

Please wait… references are loading.