Abstract
Color assessment of animal source foods was investigated using a computer vision system (CVS) and a traditional colorimeter. With the same measurement conditions, color readings varied between these two approaches. The color measured by CVS was highly similar to the actual color of animal source foods, and ranged from 75.0%-100.0% of actual colors, whereas colors read by a Minolta colorimeter showed non-typical appearances. The CVS-obtained colors were more similar to the color of food visualized on the monitor, compared to colorimeter-generated color chips. Considering these results, it could be concluded that the CVS is a superior alternative for replacing traditional devices by providing better accuracy.
Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.