This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Paper The following article is Open access

Peat Physical and Hydraulic Properties Due to Peatland Fires

, and

Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd
, , Citation Budi Indra Setiawan et al 2020 IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 504 012020 DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/504/1/012020

1755-1315/504/1/012020

Abstract

Fires on tropical peatlands in Indonesia are unexpected events that happened sporadically, especially during dry seasons. It is not easy to judge why a fire presents in a certain spot, and how it spreads. There are indications, and originally, a fire is ignited intentionally to clear bushes and wood remnants on the land surface for land clearing. Its most negative impacts are on human health due to dispersing smokes locally, and occasionally, reached neighboring countries. It is not unusual, the fire spread beyond the initial spot, and burned a vast area of commercial plantations, and protected forests in the vicinity. Fires caused significant economic losses. This investigation aimed at making clearer how peat properties changed before and sometime after the fires burned the areas. We observed how fires in peatlands occurred, and to what extent the physical properties of peats altered due to fires. Observations were carried out in 4 locations within Riau province, South Sumatra province, and South Kalimantan province that have vast areas of peatlands in the country, and peatland fires there are more frequent. The observations focused on peatland morphological appearances, and physical properties of non-burned and after fires in protected forests, plantations, and smallholder lands. The physical and hydraulic properties that were analyzed, among others, are bulk density, particle density, porosity, available water capacity, and water permeability. Positive changes were experienced successively by the air-entry head (21.3%) followed by permeability (19.6%), particle density (15.9%), bulk density (10.7%), available water (7.4%), fast-drain pore (3.9%) and n-parameter (0.1%). While, negative changes were experienced successively by slow-drain pore (-72.2%), residual water content (-22.5%), porosity (-7.3%), saturated water content (-6.3%) and m-parameter (-2.6%). The increase of air-entry head and the available water indicated more capable of retaining more water. Meanwhile, the increase of permeability and fast pore drain mean the burnt peats would be easier to drain under the same suction gradient. However, based on the F-test with a probability value of 5%, those all changes were not so significant or considerably small compared to the associated critical values.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

Please wait… references are loading.
10.1088/1755-1315/504/1/012020