Abstract
The computed charge transport key parameters like, charge transfer integral, site energy and reorganization energy are used to study the hole and electron transport in dialkyl substituted thienothiophene caped benzobisthiazole (BDHTT-BBT) and methyl-substituted dicyanovinyl-capped quinquethiophene (DCV5T-Me) molecular crystals. The effect of structural fluctuation on charge transport in these molecules is analysed by Monte-Carlo simulations. To estimate the equilibrium speed during the charge transport process in these molecular solids, we have introduced the parameters such as, potential equilibrium rate and density flux rate. Here, the density flux rate is directly related with the drift force which facilitates the charge transfer along the consequential hopping sites. Our theoretical study reveals that the charge transfer up to the crossover point (or disorder drift time) is exponential, non-dispersive and it follows the static non-Condon effect. Beyond the disorder drift time, the charge transfer is partially exponential, dispersive and it follows the dynamic non-Condon principle. The expressions of density flux and diffusion shows their dependency on dynamic disorder and is in agreement with the Troisi's model on diffusion limited by thermal disorder.
Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
This article (and all articles in the proceedings volume relating to the same conference) has been retracted by IOP Publishing following an extensive investigation in line with the COPE guidelines. This investigation has uncovered evidence of systematic manipulation of the publication process and considerable citation manipulation.
IOP Publishing respectfully requests that readers consider all work within this volume potentially unreliable, as the volume has not been through a credible peer review process.
IOP Publishing regrets that our usual quality checks did not identify these issues before publication, and have since put additional measures in place to try to prevent these issues from reoccurring. IOP Publishing wishes to credit anonymous whistleblowers and the Problematic Paper Screener [1] for bringing some of the above issues to our attention, prompting us to investigate further.
[1] Cabanac G, Labbé C and Magazinov A 2021 arXiv:2107.06751v1
Retraction published: 23 February 2022