Abstract
The new advancement of online enrollment and occupation enlistment systems has made another media for web fraudsters. The improvement of the update of ongoing innovation has restricted a few organizations to move into electronic board structures. The benefits of such electronic edges are liberal. From one perspective, they are the most ideal approach to lead numerous organizations' applicants, and afterward once more, the contenders while following a task will be more involved. Community with bogus motives research these structures for sensitive information to be optimized by techniques for fake counteractive action advancements. In this article we are utilizing open informational indexes and AI computations to arrange phony or real posts. The target of this audit is to fuse both content, put together information and meta-information with respect to the situations in the work. The informational collection can be utilized to make characterization models that can acclimate themselves with the deceptive arrangements of duties. Gathering information models utilizing request computations like Logistic Regression, K Nearest Neighbors and RandomForest.
Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
This article (and all articles in the proceedings volume relating to the same conference) has been retracted by IOP Publishing following an extensive investigation in line with the COPE guidelines. This investigation has uncovered evidence of systematic manipulation of the publication process and considerable citation manipulation.
IOP Publishing respectfully requests that readers consider all work within this volume potentially unreliable, as the volume has not been through a credible peer review process.
IOP Publishing regrets that our usual quality checks did not identify these issues before publication, and have since put additional measures in place to try to prevent these issues from reoccurring. IOP Publishing wishes to credit anonymous whistleblowers and the Problematic Paper Screener [1] for bringing some of the above issues to our attention, prompting us to investigate further.
[1] Cabanac G, Labbé C and Magazinov A 2021 arXiv:2107.06751v1
Retraction published: 23 February 2022