Viewpoint

Can iron-based superconductors become the next generation of coated conductors?*

Published 30 July 2020 © 2020 IOP Publishing Ltd
, , Citation Soon-Gil Jung 2020 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 33 090501 DOI 10.1088/1361-6668/aba547

0953-2048/33/9/090501

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

This is a viewpoint on the letter by Dong Li et al (2020 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 33 03LT01).

Superconductors are most important for use in applications requiring a high magnetic field because of their ability to conduct a large electric current without power dissipation. Large current-carrying capability of a superconductor has substantial advantages, especially in terms of weight and space, compared to normal metals [1, 2]. However, because of the difficulties associated with realizing superconductors with properties suitable for high-field applications, their practical applicability is limited. In this regard, NbTi (Tc: ∼9 K), which requires expensive liquid helium for its operation, is currently the most widely used superconductor in the market [3]. One of the most critical factors for utilizing a superconductor in high-field applications is the improvement of the magnetic field performance of the critical current density (Jc) of the superconducting material. The power loss in type-II superconductors is mainly generated by the motion of the quantized magnetic flux lines, known as vortices, unlike the resistance that occurs in a normal metal.

A vortex of the magnitude φ0 = h/2e starts to enter type-II superconductors when the applied magnetic field exceeds the lower critical field (Hc1) and the number of vortices is proportional to the applied magnetic field [4]. In addition, because the vortices in a superconductor can be moved by applying an electric current, which generates electrical resistance, restricting the motion of vortices is the key to improving the ability of the superconductor to conduct electric current without power dissipation.

The creation of flux (or vortex) pinning sites inside the superconducting material has been widely used to enhance the in-field Jc. Flux pinning, which leads to a frozen vortex state, is caused by local energy minima for the flux lines at weak or nonsuperconducting pinning sites. Vortices trapped at pinning sites can be retained up to FL = Fp. Here, FL = J × B is the Lorentz force, which induces the vortex motion and Fp = − Jc × B is the volume flux pinning force density [5].

A wide range of defects including point, line and bulk defects can act as flux pinning sites [5, 6]. However, because the effect of each pinning site is influenced by the fundamental properties of the specific superconducting system, the approach to increase the in-field Jc also depends on the type of superconducting material. For instance, grain boundaries are one of the most effective pinning sources for conventional superconductors, such as MgB2 and Nb3Sn [7, 8]. However, they cause Jc to deteriorate in high-Tc cuprate superconductors (HTSs) owing to the weak-link problem [9]. Although many researchers have devoted considerable efforts to improve Jc in high magnetic fields, this remains an open issue because of complex vortex phenomena.

REBa2Cu3O7-x (RE = Y, Gd) HTSs are the most attractive superconducting materials with respect to commercial applications. This is because they have Tc values above the boiling point of liquid nitrogen (∼77 K), high upper critical field (Hc2) values and large self-field Jc values. However, these materials are problematic in that they are strongly anisotropic and contain weak links, both of which continue to be major drawbacks for high-field applications [10]. In early 2008, the discovery of an iron-based superconductor (IBSC) with a Tc of ∼26 K (LaFeAsO1-xFx) brought great excitement to the field of condensed matter physics because of its high Tc, despite containing the ferromagnetic element iron (Fe) [11]. Soon thereafter, a family of IBSC compounds was discovered, and their large Hc2 and the superior field performance of Jc in spite of their relatively low self-field Jc make them promising candidates for practical applications requiring high magnetic fields, such as high field magnets, generators, fusion tokamaks and so on [12]. However, because most IBSCs contain the toxic element arsenic (As), IBSCs based on non-toxic elements, such as FeSe, would be more useful for real applications.

Even though the Tc of the binary compound FeSe is approximately 9 K, it can be enhanced significantly by applying pressure, ionic gating or chemical intercalation [1315]. Among these methods to increase the Tc of FeSe systems, chemical intercalation is the most appropriate for practical applications. However, the intercalated FeSe compound is typically air and moisture sensitive. Thankfully, an air-stable (Li,Fe)OHFeSe system with a Tc as high as ∼42 K was recently synthesized. In addition, high-quality (Li,Fe)OHFeSe superconducting films have also been successfully fabricated using a hydrothermal epitaxial technique [15]. These findings can be expected to encourage studies on their superconducting critical properties, such as Jc and Hc2, for real applications.

The Letter by Dong Li et al [16] reports their investigation of Jc of (Li,Fe)OHFeSe films and they discovered a route to improve the field performance of Jc. In particular, Jc of pure (Li,Fe)OHFeSe films is 0.03 MA cm−2 at 33 T, whereas the use of Mn as a dopant remarkably increases Jc to 0.32 MA cm−2 when exposed to the same magnetic field of 33 T. To the best of our knowledge, this is the highest Jc value among the IBSCs reported thus far and exceeds the Jc value (=0.1 MA cm−2) which is a common benchmark for practical applications. Therefore, this work lays the foundation for the development of high-field applications of (Li,Fe)OHFeSe-coated conductors (CCs) because thin-film manufacturing technology forms the basis of the original technology for the production of CCs.

Acknowledgments

S-G Jung received funding from the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea by a grant funded by the Korean Ministry of Science, and ICT and Planning (No. 2012R1A3A2048816) and from the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2018R1D1A1B07048987).

Footnotes

  • This is a viewpoint on the letter by Dong Li et al (2019 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 32 12LT01).

Please wait… references are loading.
10.1088/1361-6668/aba547