ABSTRACT
Dust grains are nucleation centers and catalysts for the growth of icy mantles in quiescent interstellar clouds, the products of which may accumulate into preplanetary matter when new stars and solar systems form within the clouds. In this paper, we present the first spectroscopic detections of silicate dust and the molecular ices H2O, CO, and CO2 in the vicinity of the prestellar core L183 (L134N). An infrared photometric survey of the cloud was used to identify reddened background stars, and we present spectra covering solid-state absorption features in the wavelength range 2–20 μm for nine of them. The mean composition of the ices in the best-studied line of sight (toward J15542044−0254073) is H2O:CO:CO2 ≈ 100:40:24. The ices are amorphous in structure, indicating that they have been maintained at low temperature (≲ 15 K) since formation. The ice column density N(H2O) correlates with reddening by dust, exhibiting a threshold effect that corresponds to the transition from unmantled grains in the outer layers of the cloud to ice-mantled grains within, analogous to that observed in other dark clouds. A comparison of results for L183 and the Taurus and IC 5146 dark clouds suggests common behavior, with mantles first appearing in each case at a dust column corresponding to a peak optical depth τ9.7 = 0.15 ± 0.03 in the silicate feature. Our results support a previous conclusion that the color excess EJ − K does not obey a simple linear correlation with the total dust column in lines of sight that intercept dense clouds. The most likely explanation is a systematic change in the optical properties of the dust as the density increases.
Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS
1. INTRODUCTION
The interplay between gas and dust is a major factor controlling the chemical evolution of the interstellar medium (ISM). Dust grains composed of refractory material such as amorphous silicates and amorphous or graphitic carbon provide substrates for physical adsorption of species from the gas, and they also catalyze chemical reactions between the adsorbed species. Surface chemistry is important because the abundances of many observed species can be explained only when surface reactions are included in astrochemical models (e.g., Herbst & van Dishoeck 2009). The combined outcome of physical attachment and surface chemistry on grains inside cold, dense, molecular clouds is the growth of icy mantles, composed principally of H2O, with contributions from other species such as CO, CO2, CH3OH, and CH4 (e.g., Gibb et al. 2004; Öberg et al. 2011). Further evolution may lead to the production of more complex organic species, especially in the presence of an energy source with the onset of star formation in the cloud (Garrod & Herbst 2006; Öberg et al. 2009). The interstellar endowment of dust, ices, water, and organic molecules to protoplanetary disks is of great interest as a resource for building potentially life-bearing planets in new solar systems.
To fully constrain the nature of the evolutionary process outlined above, it is important to explore the onset of mantle growth and the efficiency of the relevant chemical surface reactions as functions of interstellar environment. Previous work has shown that ices are typically detected in quiescent molecular clouds above some threshold extinction (e.g., Chiar et al. 2011; Whittet 2003, and references therein), suggesting that certain physical conditions must be reached for mantle growth to be instigated, such as a critical density, temperature, or degree of shielding from the external radiation field. In the Taurus dark cloud, for example, the threshold for H2O–ice occurs at a visual extinction of AV ≈ 3.2 mag (Whittet et al. 2001), and values in other clouds studied to date are either similar or considerably larger (see Section 3.1.1 of Chiar et al. 2011 for discussion and references). H2O forms on dust by sequential hydrogenation of adsorbed atomic O, as predicted theoretically (e.g., Jones & Williams 1984; Cuppen & Herbst 2007) and confirmed experimentally (e.g., Dulieu et al. 2010). The threshold extinction may correspond to conditions that permit formation of the first few complete monolayers of H2O on the substrate; because of strong hydrogen bonding between neighboring H2O molecules in bulk ice, the residual local radiation field will then no longer inhibit further growth by photodesorption (Williams et al. 1992). Some apparent cloud-to-cloud differences in threshold may be accounted for simply by varying degrees of foreground extinction (Chiar et al. 2011), suggesting the possibility that mantle growth is a ubiquitous and quantifiable process in clouds lacking internal sources of radiation.
In this paper, we explore the dust and ice content of the Lynds dark nebula LDN 183 (SIMBAD designation; Lynds 1962), which we hereafter abbreviate to L183. Also known as L134N, L183 is part of a complex of apparently interconnected clouds that include L134 and L169 (see, for example, Figure 3 of Juvela et al. 2002). Situated ∼37° above the Galactic plane at a distance ∼110 pc (Franco 1989), it is one of the closest starless cores to the Sun and is expected to suffer negligible foreground extinction. Its estimated mass is ∼80 M☉ (Pagani et al. 2004), and internal dust temperatures may be as low as ∼7 K (Pagani et al. 2003, 2005). The infrared scattering properties of the dust in the region are consistent with grain growth to sizes ∼1 μm (Pagani et al. 2010; Steinacker et al. 2010; Juvela et al. 2012). Detailed gas-phase molecular-line studies suggest that L183 is chemically evolved (Dickens et al. 2000), has undergone substantial freeze-out of gas-phase molecules onto dust (Pagani et al. 2005, 2012; Crapsi et al. 2005), and has entered the initial stages of fragmentation and collapse to form stars (Kirk et al. 2009). L183 thus represents a significantly different (and more limited) set of environments compared with other cloud complexes in which the distribution of ices have been studied in detail, such as those in IC 5146 and in the Taurus, Serpens, and Ophiuchus dark clouds, all of which contain regions of current star formation as well as regions of relative quiescence.
Studies of interstellar absorption features are naturally dependent on the availability of background field stars to act as continuum sources. At the Galactic latitude of our target cloud, they are in rather short supply. We begin by searching available photometric infrared databases for sources toward L183 with colors matching those expected for normal field stars reddened by dust within the cloud, of which 32 are identified. We present infrared spectra for nine stars selected from this list. The first detections of H2O, CO, and CO2 ices in L183 are presented, discussed, and compared with previous results for other clouds.
2. OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTIONS
2.1. Target Selection and Photometry
Initial target selection was carried out using the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) database to identify objects with near-infrared colors consistent with those of reddened background field stars located beyond L183. We followed the procedure adopted by Shenoy et al. (2008) for their survey of the Taurus dark cloud. A survey area with a radius of 15 arcmin centered on the nominal position of L1836 was chosen, which includes the entire high-density region of the cloud. Our search criteria selected stars with high quality photometry (lack of confusion, contamination, and other "bad data" flags, and with signal-to-noise ratios >20 in each of the three 2MASS passbands; see Shenoy et al. 2008), and with values of the color index H − Ks > 0.35 (to eliminate unreddened stars). This yielded a sample of 32 candidates, listed in Table 1 together with all available photometry in the wavelength range 1–12 μm. The photometry includes data in the J (1.24 μm), H (1.66 μm), and Ks (2.16 μm) passbands from 2MASS and data in the 3.4, 4.6, and 11.6 μm passbands from the preliminary release of the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) point-source catalog; both of these catalogs were accessed using the general catalog query engine of the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive.7
Table 1. Catalog of Reddened Field Stars Toward L183 with Infrared Photometry
| 2MASS ID | 2MASS | IRAC | WISE | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J − H | H − Ks | Ks | [3.6] | [4.5] | [5.8] | [8.0] | [3.4] | [4.6] | [12] | |
| J15532007−0254567 | 1.024 | 0.377 | 5.856 | ... | ... | ... | ... | 5.75 | 5.72 | 5.73 |
| J15532627−0256059 | 1.177 | 0.600 | 13.760 | 13.21 | 13.19 | 13.05 | 12.87 | 13.45 | 13.10 | ... |
| J15533207−0254129 | 1.366 | 0.548 | 9.908 | 9.80 | 9.68 | 9.50 | 9.44 | 9.70 | 9.57 | 9.50 |
| J15533212−0255366 | 1.098 | 0.503 | 13.435 | 13.27 | 13.23 | 13.16 | 13.02 | 13.32 | 13.24 | ... |
| J15533697−0253255 | 1.344 | 0.450 | 13.592 | 13.24 | 13.21 | 12.96 | 13.05 | 13.39 | 13.22 | ... |
| J15533767−0257051 | 1.170 | 0.508 | 13.405 | 13.19 | 13.14 | 13.02 | 12.97 | 13.23 | 13.11 | ... |
| J15534065−0253550 | 1.705 | 0.715 | 10.450 | 10.17 | 10.03 | 9.87 | 9.87 | 10.28 | 10.02 | 10.26 |
| J15534665−0301213 | 1.148 | 0.439 | 13.136 | 12.78 | 12.76 | 12.68 | 12.64 | 12.90 | 12.74 | ... |
| J15534669−0302312 | 0.839 | 0.391 | 13.243 | 13.11 | 13.09 | 13.08 | 13.04 | 13.12 | 13.07 | ... |
| J15534803−0302027 | 1.030 | 0.358 | 9.806 | 9.78 | 9.65 | 9.54 | 9.49 | 9.62 | 9.62 | 9.68 |
| J15535171−0258201 | 1.272 | 0.568 | 11.851 | 11.47 | 11.37 | 11.24 | 11.26 | 11.62 | 11.36 | 11.81 |
| J15535201−0303293 | 0.826 | 0.425 | 14.003 | 13.86 | 13.84 | 13.58 | 13.68 | 13.85 | 13.88 | ... |
| J15535240−0255462 | 1.229 | 0.568 | 12.392 | 12.16 | 12.12 | 12.08 | 12.08 | 12.28 | 12.11 | ... |
| J15535604−0247503 | 1.062 | 0.397 | 12.278 | 12.04 | 11.99 | 11.95 | 11.95 | 12.12 | 12.01 | ... |
| J15535853−0302314 | 1.034 | 0.436 | 6.951 | ... | ... | 6.54 | 6.61 | 6.71 | 6.75 | 6.72 |
| J15540027−0250324 | 2.086 | 0.884 | 10.786 | 10.51 | 10.16 | 10.01 | 10.00 | 10.54 | 10.16 | 10.46 |
| J15540245−0258295 | 1.247 | 0.595 | 13.356 | 12.97 | 12.84 | 12.59 | 12.09 | 13.12 | 12.88 | ... |
| J15540314−0300566 | 1.177 | 0.545 | 13.231 | 13.03 | 13.01 | 12.94 | 13.02 | 13.10 | 12.98 | ... |
| J15540674−0301311 | 1.180 | 0.617 | 12.959 | 12.70 | 12.64 | 12.60 | 12.60 | 12.82 | 12.64 | ... |
| J15540703−0259045 | 1.384 | 0.601 | 11.992 | 11.64 | 11.51 | 11.41 | 11.41 | 11.77 | 11.52 | ... |
| J15541217−0303575 | 0.669 | 0.407 | 13.866 | 13.83 | 13.84 | 13.82 | 13.35 | 13.86 | 13.85 | ... |
| J15541974−0245257 | 1.094 | 0.456 | 11.594 | 11.27 | 11.33 | 11.14 | 11.10 | 11.39 | 11.21 | ... |
| J15542044−0254073 | 2.071 | 1.005 | 7.910 | ... | ... | 7.05 | 7.11 | 7.59 | 7.28 | 7.28 |
| J15542091−0245412 | 1.151 | 0.458 | 13.879 | 13.63 | 13.60 | 13.47 | 13.39 | 13.67 | 13.52 | ... |
| J15542477−0256229 | 1.480 | 0.499 | 12.905 | 12.54 | 12.44 | 12.38 | 12.29 | 12.61 | 12.45 | ... |
| J15542574−0247181 | 1.100 | 0.378 | 10.737 | 10.60 | 10.45 | 10.39 | 10.31 | 10.58 | 10.51 | 10.47 |
| J15542697−0251486 | 1.223 | 0.501 | 13.744 | 13.46 | 13.42 | 13.18 | 13.51 | 13.58 | 13.41 | ... |
| J15542941−0248237 | 1.088 | 0.450 | 9.511 | 9.55 | 9.51 | 9.26 | 9.19 | 9.33 | 9.33 | 9.35 |
| J15543191−0248537 | 1.117 | 0.422 | 11.823 | 11.51 | 11.50 | 11.46 | 11.40 | 11.61 | 11.48 | ... |
| J15543246−0252113 | 0.877 | 0.414 | 11.775 | 11.57 | 11.49 | 11.45 | 11.43 | 11.55 | 11.48 | ... |
| J15543429−0256232 | 0.935 | 0.505 | 13.115 | 12.74 | 12.63 | 12.63 | 12.74 | 12.73 | 12.66 | ... |
| J15543502−0254030 | 1.391 | 0.539 | 13.587 | 13.03 | 13.05 | 12.81 | 12.93 | 13.15 | 12.85 | ... |
Download table as: ASCIITypeset image
In addition to 2MASS and WISE data, we also present photometry extracted from images obtained with the Infrared Array Camera (IRAC; Fazio et al. 2004) of the Spitzer Space Telescope (Werner et al. 2004) in the standard IRAC passbands centered at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8.0 μm. The raw IRAC images were obtained from the Spitzer Heritage Archive (program no. 94, PI: Charles Lawrence; see also Steinacker et al. 2010). The raw images were processed with Spitzer pipeline S18.7.0 to produce corrected basic calibrated data (cBCD). The Mosaicking and Point Source Extraction package was used to reduce the data. Overlap corrections were performed to remove mismatches in the background emission due to bias fluctuations, following standard procedures that include masking bright objects, interpolating all cBCD to a common grid, and removing the background fluctuation by calculating the offset of each image with respect to a common level. Corrected cBCD were then used to generate the final mosaic of L183. The overlap-corrected cBCD were interpolated to a common grid and corrected for cosmic-ray hits and bad pixels. The images were then co-added to produce four tiles, which were then combined to create a mosaic that included the entire cloud. We then performed aperture photometry of point sources in the mosaics for each of the IRAC bands. As the images for bands 1 and 2 (3.6 and 4.5 μm) appear moderately crowded, we used a small aperture radius for photometry and an annulus close to each star to estimate the background. Aperture and color corrections were done using data from Tables 4.7 and 4.3, respectively, in the IRAC Instrument Handbook. A pixel phase correction was done for all the point sources in band 1. Finally, we performed a simple positional matching in a radius of 3.0 arcsec to associate the IRAC point sources with corresponding point sources in the 2MASS catalog. The resulting photometry for our selected program stars is listed in Table 1 and has a typical uncertainty of ±0.02. The brightest program star is saturated in all four bands, and two others show evidence of saturation in bands 1 and 2: these data have been omitted from Table 1.
Representative color–color diagrams based on the photometry listed in Table 1 are plotted in Figure 1. These include the standard J − H versus H − Ks diagram based on 2MASS data, and J − H versus H − [4.5] as an example of a color–color diagram extending to longer wavelengths than available with 2MASS data alone. Figure 1 may be compared with Figures 2 and 3 of Shenoy et al. (2008), which display the equivalent data for Taurus field stars and young stellar objects (YSOs), respectively. All of the L183 targets fall within or very close to zones expected for normal reddened photospheres in these plots, consistent with classification as background field stars with visual extinctions ranging up to AV ∼ 14 mag. Indeed, none of the available photometry shows evidence of infrared excess emission at these wavelengths that might be indicative of warm circumstellar material around YSOs or other types of embedded stars. This result is fully consistent with the assumed status of L183 as a prestellar core (Section 1).
Figure 1. Infrared color–color diagrams for 32 candidate field stars toward L183, plotting photometry from Table 1. Stars for which spectroscopy is presented in this paper are distinguished by solid (red) circles. The J − H vs. H − Ks plot (above) is based entirely on 2MASS data; the J − H vs. H − [4.5] plot (below) uses IRAC band 2 photometry if available, and WISE band 2 photometry otherwise. The curves to the lower left in each plot represent intrinsic colors (see Shenoy et al. 2008 and references therein). The diagonal dotted lines are parallel to the appropriate reddening vector (arrows; see Section 3) and thus represent the upper and lower bounds of the area in which reddened field stars with normal intrinsic colors are expected to be distributed.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageStars in Table 1 were prioritized as candidates for spectroscopy according to apparent brightness and the goal of covering the available range of extinction. Nine stars for which spectroscopic data are presented below are highlighted in red in Figure 1 and listed in Table 2. Their distribution with respect to the cloud core is shown in Figure 2, which overlays extinction contours from Pagani et al. (2004) on a mosaic of 3.6 μm IRAC images; program stars are labeled alphabetically in order of increasing extinction (see Table 3 and Section 3.1). Of these, star H (J15542044−0254073, AV ≈ 12.5 mag) proves to be a particularly valuable probe of interstellar features, as it is among both the brightest and the most reddened in the set. We note, however, that all of our program stars are separated by at least 3 arcmin from the dense core of the cloud, in which extinctions as high as AV ∼ 150 mag have been estimated (Pagani et al. 2004).
Figure 2. Mosaic of 3.6 μm Spitzer IRAC images of the L183 region (Steinacker et al. 2010), showing the loci of our spectroscopic program stars (Table 3) relative to the cloud core near the center of the frame. North is up and east is to the left, and the frame is ∼26.3 arcmin wide. Star A lies just beyond the western edge of the mosaic. Also shown are the AV = 5 and 10 mag extinction contours from Pagani et al. (2004).
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageTable 2. Identifications and Spectroscopic Observations of Program Stars
| 2MASS ID | Other IDa | Ground-based | Spitzer Spectrac | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spectrab | Low Resolution | High Resolution | ||
| J15332007−0254567 | Snell 4, StKM 1-1281 | SPEX | 23004160 | |
| J15533207−0254129 | SPEX | |||
| J15534065−0253550 | SPEX | 23006720 | ||
| J15534803−0302027 | SPEX | 23006976 | ||
| J15535853−0302314 | Snell 1 | SPEX | 23004416 | |
| J15540027−0250324 | SPEX | 10707200 | ||
| J15541974−0245257 | SPEX | |||
| J15542044−0254073 | Snell 2 | SPEX, CGS2 | 10706944 | 23003648 |
| J15542941−0248237 | Snell 5 | SPEX | ||
Notes. a Snell identifications are from the near-infrared survey of L134N (=L183) and other dark clouds by Snell (1981); the StKM identification is from the spectroscopic survey of K and M stars by Stephenson (1986). b SpeX observations were carried out on the IRTF in 2008 April 3–6, using grating mode LXD1.9 to cover the spectral range 1.9–4.1 μm. CGS2 observations were carried out on the UKIRT in 1988 June 3–4 and 1990 May 26–29, covering the spectral ranges 2.85–3.75 μm and 4.6–4.8 μm, respectively. c Spitzer observations are identified by Astronomical Observation Request (AOR) keys. The high resolution spectrum was obtained in SH mode (spectral range 9.9–19.6 μm); low resolution spectra were obtained in SL1, SL2, and LL2 modes (combined spectral range 5.2–21.3 μm).
Download table as: ASCIITypeset image
2.2. Ground-based Spectroscopy
The SpeX instrument (Rayner et al. 2003) was used on NASA's Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF) at Mauna Kea Observatory in 2008 April 3–6 to obtain spectra for the nine program stars listed in Table 2. The spectral range from 2.0 to 4.1 μm was covered in the long-wavelength cross-dispersed (LXD) SpeX mode at a resolving power of R ≈ 1500. This range encompasses the strong interstellar H2O–ice absorption feature centered near 3.1 μm, and also includes the 2.3–2.5 μm gaseous CO overtone bands, which are prominent in late-type photospheres and thus useful as an aid to spectral classification. Observations of nearby standard stars were used to provide flux calibration and elimination of telluric features. Data reductions were carried out using the SpeXtool package (Cushing et al. 2004), which includes all necessary routines to produce flux- and wavelength-calibrated spectra from the raw spectral images. The final spectra are shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3. IRTF-SpeX 2–4 μm spectra of nine program stars. The spectra are displayed in order of increasing extinction from top to bottom (the vertical scale corresponds to the top spectrum, the others being displaced for display). Identification labels are explained in Table 3. Continuum fits used to calculate optical depth spectra are shown in red. The broad absorption feature centered near 3.05 μm is identified with H2O–ice.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageWe also make use of archival data obtained with the United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (UKIRT) at Mauna Kea Observatory for one program star (H). The UKIRT cooled grating spectrometer (CGS2) was used to obtain spectra at resolving power of R ≈ 600, covering (1) the 2.85–3.75 μm spectral region (observing date 1988 June 4) and (2) the 4.6–4.8 μm spectral region (observing date 1990 May 19). Data reduction procedures follow those described by Chiar et al. (1994) for similar observations made with the same instrument, and are analogous to those used for the SpeX data. The resulting spectra are shown in Figure 4 and compared with our SpeX data for this star over the same spectral range. Allowing for the lower resolution and somewhat poorer signal-to-noise ratio of the CGS2 data, the agreement in the region of overlap is well within the uncertainties. The importance of the UKIRT/CGS2 dataset is that it provides coverage of the 4.6–4.8 μm spectral region, yielding a detection of the 4.67 μm CO ice feature.
Figure 4. IRTF-SpeX and UKIRT-CGS2 spectra (magenta and green, respectively) of the program star H (J15542044−0254073). The spectral range includes absorption features of H2O and CO ices centered near 3.05 and 4.67 μm, respectively (note the break and scale change on the wavelength axis between the two segments). The UKIRT-CGS2 spectrum yields the only available detection of CO ice in L183 to date.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution image2.3. Spitzer Spectroscopy
Mid-infrared spectra were obtained for six program stars8 with the Infrared Spectrograph (IRS; Houck et al. 2004) on board the Spitzer Space Telescope. Standard staring-mode observations were executed with the low-resolution (R ≈ 60) IRS modules short-low (SL) and long-low (LL), covering the spectral range 5–21 μm. Additionally, a higher-resolution spectrum of star H was obtained with the short-high module (SH; R ≈ 600) over the spectral range 10–19 μm. The observations are identified by the Astronomical Observation Request (AOR) keys listed in Table 2. The majority of the observations (AORs beginning with 2300) were obtained between 2007 August 31 and 2008 March 23 as part of our Spitzer Cycle 4 General Observer program 40432 (PI: Douglas Whittet); the remaining two observations were obtained on 2005 August 6 and 7, and are from program 3290 (PI: William Langer).
The SH observation of J15542044−0254073 (AOR 23003648) utilized six ramp cycles, yielding a total on-source integration time of 1748 s. A dedicated spectrum of the sky background in the region (AOR 23003904) was obtained to provide background subtraction. The raw spectra were processed by the standard Spitzer pipeline (version 15.3.0) to produce basic calibrated data. Further reductions to produce the final calibrated spectra were carried out using the SMART software package (Higdon et al. 2004) and standard procedures to remove bad pixels and other artifacts, as in our previous work described in Section 2 of Whittet et al. (2007).
The low-resolution observations utilized the standard two-position nod pattern along the slit axis, one-third of the way from the slit ends. The exposures obtained at the "off" nod positions were used as background exposures and to compensate for detector artifacts and cosmic-ray events. Initial data reductions were performed using basic calibrated data and subsequent analysis with SMART. However, final extracted spectra were retrieved from the Cornell Atlas of Spitzer IRS sources9 (CASSIS v.4; Lebouteiller et al. 2011), which provided improvements over our initial reductions. Post-extraction processing was performed to scale the flux density of the SL module to that of the LL module at 14 μm. The uncertainties in the flux density are estimated to be half the difference of the two independent spectra from each nod position.
The final low-resolution flux spectra, shown in Figure 5, exhibit continua consistent with stellar photospheres in the Rayleigh–Jeans limit, as expected for normal field stars. The broad amorphous silicate absorption feature centered at 9.7 μm is present and most prominent in the spectra of stars with the highest extinction, as expected. The SH spectrum of star H was obtained specifically to search for the 15.2 μm CO2 bending-mode ice feature in this line of sight, and to place constraints on its profile shape. The 14–17 μm spectrum displaying this feature is plotted in Figure 6 and compared with the corresponding low-resolution data from Figure 5.
Figure 5. Spitzer-IRS low-resolution 5.2–20 μm spectra of six program stars. The spectra are displayed in order of increasing extinction from top to bottom, with continuum fits shown in red, as in Figure 3. Identification labels are explained in Table 3.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageFigure 6. Spitzer-IRS spectra of J15542044−0254073 (star H) in the region of the 15.2 μm CO2 ice absorption feature: high and low resolution spectra are plotted as a green line and gray points with error bars, respectively. The adopted continuum is shown in red.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution image2.4. Optical Depths
The final flux spectra were converted to optical depth in the normal way using the relation

where Fobs(λ) and Fcont(λ) are the observed and continuum flux densities at wavelength λ, respectively. In the case of the IRTF/SpeX spectra, the local continuum for the broad 3.05 μm H2O–ice absorption feature was determined using a second-order polynomial fit to the data in the 2.0–2.3 μm and 3.65–4.0 μm regions, which lie beyond the wings of the feature and are relatively free of photospheric lines; the fits and the resulting optical depth spectra are shown in Figures 3 and 7, respectively. For the CO–ice feature observed in the UKIRT/CGS spectrum (Figure 4), we adopted a simple linear continuum fit to the relatively "clean" adjacent regions at 4.62–4.65 μm and 4.75–4.78 μm. Similarly, for the 15.2 μm CO2–ice feature in the Spitzer SH spectrum (Figure 6), we adopted a linear continuum fit to the adjacent regions at 14.2–14.8 μm and 16.0–16.6 μm. Optical depth spectra for the H2O, CO and CO2 ice features in star H are shown in Figures 8–10, respectively.
Figure 7. Optical depth spectra in the 2.8–4.0 μm wavelength range, calculated from the IRTF-SpeX spectra shown in Figure 3. Individual spectra are displaced vertically such that they appear in order of increasing extinction from top to bottom. Identification labels are explained in Table 3.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageFigure 8. Enlargement of the 2.8–4.0 μm optical depth spectrum from Figure 7 of J15542044−0254073 (star H, black line), illustrating the profile of the H2O–ice absorption feature centered near 3.05 μm. The profile of the feature observed in the spectrum of the Taurus field star Elias 16 (Smith et al. 1989, red curve) is superposed, scaled to match the feature in star H.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageA different approach was adopted for the Spitzer low-resolution spectra, as these span a wider range of wavelengths and contain several interstellar features, some of which are overlapping. A global continuum was determined for each spectrum using a nonlinear least-squares fitting technique, which simultaneously determines the unabsorbed background continuum and the solid-state extinction over the entire 5.2–20.5 μm wavelength range. Details of the spectral decomposition analysis are described elsewhere (Poteet 2012). Briefly, the continua are simulated by a low-order polynomial, with a maximum degree of three, and the dust and ice opacities are modeled as a linear combination of amorphous silicates (Dorschner et al. 1995), H2O–ice (Hudgins et al. 1993), and the empirical absorption profiles of the 5–8 μm ice components (Boogert et al. 2008). To account for the intrinsic photospheric absorption of blended gas-phase CO and SiO near 4.7 and 8.0 μm, respectively, we additionally derive photospheric optical depth spectra from Ardila et al. (2010) for K- and M-type giants of luminosity class III (see Section 3 below). The modeled spectral energy distributions (SEDs) and optical depth spectra for the three program stars with the highest quality spectra are shown in Figure 11. Using the same method, an analysis of archival Spitzer IRS data for the Taurus field star Elias 16 (AOR 5637632) is also shown for comparison.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Spectral Classifications and Reddening
Spectral classifications were estimated for our program stars, based on comparisons between our spectra and those in the Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF) Spectral Library: Cool Stars (Rayner et al. 2009) and the Spitzer Atlas of Stellar Spectra (Ardila et al. 2010). The primary constraint is provided by the IRTF data in the 2.0–2.5 μm window (Figure 3), specifically the CO overtone bands (increasingly prominent in cool giants of type K0 or later) and the H Brγ line at 2.165 μm (discernible in giants of type K0 or earlier). A further constraint is provided by the low-resolution Spitzer spectra, as available (Figure 5), in which the 7.6–8.1 μm band of SiO becomes increasingly prominent in cool giants later than K0 (its depth is comparable to that of the 9.7 μm silicate dust feature in the spectrum of the M-type star A; see Figure 11). The resulting spectral types for all program stars are listed in Table 3 and are considered accurate to ±3 subclasses.
Table 3. Spectral Classifications, Color Excesses, Silicate Optical Depths, and Ice Column Densities for Program Starsa
| 2MASS ID | Spec. | EJ − K | τ9.7 | N(H2O) | N(CO2) | N(CO) | Labelb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J15532007−0254567 | M3 III | 0.32 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | <0.5 | ... | A |
| J15533207−0254129 | K3 III | 1.16 | ... | 6.5 ± 0.9 | ... | ... | F |
| J15534065−0253550 | K0 III | 1.87 | 0.46 ± 0.10 | 9.9 ± 1.4 | ... | ... | G |
| J15534803−0302027 | K3 III | 0.62 | 0.24 ± 0.06 | 2.2 ± 0.6 | ... | ... | B |
| J15535853−0302314 | K3 III | 0.70 | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 3.8 ± 1.1 | <0.9 | ... | D |
| J15540027−0250324 | G8 III | 2.49 | 0.56 ± 0.09 | 15.3 ± 1.5 | ... | ... | I |
| J15541974−0245257 | G2 III | 1.11 | ... | 7.2 ± 1.8 | ... | ... | E |
| J15542044−0254073 | K3 III | 2.36 | 0.52 ± 0.04 | 11.4 ± 0.5 | 2.7 ± 0.5 | 4.6 ± 0.9 | H |
| J15542941−0248237 | K5 III | 0.64 | ... | 3.2 ± 0.4 | ... | ... | C |
Notes. aAll column densities are in units of 1017 cm−2. bThe labels identify the stars in several figures; they are alphabetical in order of ascending interstellar reddening, as measured by the color excess, EJ − K.
Download table as: ASCIITypeset image
The infrared color excess EJ − K is used to quantify the interstellar reddening arising from extinction by dust toward each program star. This was calculated from the J − Ks color index in the 2MASS photometric system (the sum of Columns 2 and 3 in Table 1) by first transforming to the Bessell & Brett (1988) homogenized system, using the relation

(Carpenter 2001). EJ − K is then calculated in the usual way as the difference between the observed and intrinsic color indices, with the latter taken from Bessell & Brett (1988) for the appropriate spectral type. Results, listed in Table 3, are considered accurate to ±0.07, the main source of uncertainty being the spectral type. The observed range of 0.3–2.5 in EJ − K corresponds to an approximate range of 1.6–13.3 in AV if the mean conversion factor determined for the Taurus cloud is assumed (AV ≈ 5.3EJ − K; Whittet et al. 2001). Our results are consistent with the loci of the stars (Figure 2) relative to the extinction contours of Pagani et al. (2004) to within expected uncertainties.
3.2. Ice Column Densities
The column density of an observed molecule in the ice phase is calculated from the optical depth spectrum using the relation

where ν is the wavenumber and A is the band strength of the vibrational feature. Taking A-values from Gerakines et al. (1995), results were estimated for H2O, based on the 3.0 μm feature observed in all program stars (Figure 7), and also for CO (4.67 μm) and CO2 (15.2 μm), based on the features observed in star H (Figures 9 and 10, respectively). Additionally, the low-resolution Spitzer spectra (Figure 5) were deemed of sufficient quality at 15.2 μm to place useful limits on CO2 for two program stars (A and D). All results are listed in Table 3. The mean composition of the ices toward star H is H2O:CO:CO2 ≈ 100:40:24, which lies within the range of compositions observed in other prestellar and star-forming dark clouds (e.g., Gibb et al. 2004; Öberg et al. 2011), albeit with an above average CO:CO2 ratio. The correlation of N(H2O) with dust opacity (as measured by color excess and silicate optical depth) is presented and discussed in Section 4. The nature of the ices toward star H is discussed in greater detail in Section 5.
Figure 9. Optical depth spectrum of J15542044−0254073 (star H) in the region of the 4.67 μm solid CO absorption feature (black curve, UKIRT-CGS2 data). The red curve is an overlay of the corresponding absorption profile observed in Elias 16 (Chiar et al. 1995), scaled to match the feature in star H.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageFigure 10. Optical depth spectrum of J15542044−0254073 (star H) in the region of the 15.2 μm solid CO2 bending-mode absorption feature (black curve, Spitzer-IRS SH-mode data; see Figure 6). The red curve is an overlay of the corresponding Elias 16 profile (Bergin et al. 2005), scaled to match the feature in star H.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution image3.3. Silicates
The 9.7 μm features detected in our program stars (Figure 5) are consistent with absorption by submicrometer-sized amorphous silicate particles in L183 that presumably provide substrates for the growth of ice mantles. The contributions of silicates to the optical-depth spectra of stars A, D, and H are illustrated in Figure 11. The observations are not of high enough quality to yield detailed information on profile shapes, but they do provide adequate measures of the peak optical depth (τ9.7) of the silicate feature in six lines of sight. Results are listed in Table 3.
Figure 11. Spitzer-IRS spectra and modeled optical depth spectra of stars A, D, H, and Elias 16. Upper panel: observed SEDs (black curves), shown with unabsorbed continua (gray curves) and best-fit model SEDs (blue curves). Lower panel: observed optical depth spectra (black curves with gray error bars), shown with best-fit model optical depth spectra (blue curves). The total extinction is modeled as a linear combination of amorphous silicates (olivine + pyroxene: violet curve), H2O ice (green curve), and gaseous photospheric CO and SiO absorption from K- and M-type giants (red dotted curve). The 5–8 μm absorption toward star H and Elias 16 is modeled by five empirical ice absorption profiles from Boogert et al. (2008): C1 (magenta curve), C2 (orange curve), C3 (cyan curve), C4 (red solid curve), and C5 (yellow curve).
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageA plot of τ9.7 versus EJ − K is shown in Figure 12, combining data for L183 (Table 3) with data for the Taurus dark cloud and IC 5146. Silicate data for Taurus is from a reanalysis of Spitzer IRS low-resolution spectra, as available from the Infrared Science Archive for four stars (3, 13, 15, and 16 in the catalog of Elias 1978), and from Whittet et al. (1988) otherwise; silicate data for IC 5146 are from Chiar et al. (2011). In all cases, EJ − K was calculated from 2MASS photometry using the method described in Section 3.1 above. The solid line in Figure 12 is the correlation observed in the diffuse ISM (τ9.7 ≈ AV/18 ≈ 0.33EJ − K; Whittet 2003, and references therein). Previous studies have shown that molecular clouds tend to exhibit "normal" silicate strengths (i.e., consistent with the diffuse-ISM correlation) at low to moderate color excess (EJ − K ≲ 1.5), and "below-normal" strengths at higher values (see Figure 1 of Chiar et al. 2007). This general behavior is seen in Figure 12, and there is no convincing evidence for a systematic difference from cloud to cloud. If we make the reasonable assumption that the grains responsible for silicate absorption and near-infrared extinction are well mixed in the ISM, the relation between τ9.7 and EJ − K is expected to pass through the origin: this would clearly not be the case for a linear fit to the distribution in Figure 12, even if the most highly reddened stars are excluded; it therefore appears that the relationship between these quantities is not a simple linear correlation.
Figure 12. Correlation of the optical depth of the 9.7 μm silicate absorption feature with the color excess EJ − K for L183 (pink diamonds, Table 3). Also shown for comparison are data for field stars toward the Taurus dark cloud (green circles; see Section 3.3) and IC 5146 (blue squares; Chiar et al. 2011). The diagonal line represents the correlation observed in the diffuse ISM (Whittet 2003).
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageThe cause of this behavior is not fully understood. Detailed comparisons of spectra for diffuse and molecular-cloud environments indicate that systematic changes in the silicate absorption profile cannot account for the anomaly (van Breemen et al. 2011). A more probable explanation is that systematic changes in the optical properties of the dust in the near-infrared are being driven by grain growth within the clouds (Chiar et al. 2007), and these are affecting EJ − K, independent of the depth of the silicate feature.
4. ICE THRESHOLDS REVISITED: INITIAL CONDITIONS FOR MANTLE GROWTH
The threshold extinction for ice detection toward a molecular cloud (Section 1) is presumed to arise in the diffuse outer envelope of the cloud, in which the gas is predominantly atomic and the grains lack ice mantles. Hydrogenation of adsorbed O may trigger the formation of isolated H2O molecules on grains in this environment, but they are easily removed by photodesorption (Williams et al. 1992; Nguyen et al. 2002; Hassel et al. 2010). The radiative environment of L183 is discussed in detail by Steinacker et al. (2010), who show that diffuse infrared emission in the 3.6 and 4.5 μm IRAC images is the result of scattering by micrometer-sized grains in the central core. In contrast, the scattered light seen in blue-visible images of the cloud (see, e.g., Figure 4(d) of Juvela et al. 2002) traces its outer boundary at loci that correspond to extinctions of AV ∼ 1 mag (Steinacker et al. 2010; Pagani et al. 2004). The lines of sight to our most reddened program stars sample regions (Figure 2) intermediate between these extremes. Steinacker et al. (2010) argue against the presence of discontinuities in the dust distribution that would allow deep penetration into the cloud of energetic photons from the external interstellar radiation field (ISRF), and it is therefore reasonable to assume that the outer layers of L183 effectively shield the inner regions from ambient UV and visible photons. At the transition between the diffuse outer layers and the denser interior, simultaneous increases in the accumulation rate of atomic O and H from the gas onto the dust and in the degree of self-shielding from the external ISRF allow H2O–ice mantles to become established, and once they grow to more than a few monolayers thick they become hard to remove. The threshold extinction is effectively a measure of the locus of this transition, corresponding to an environment where the balance between production and desorption of surface H2O is changing in favor of mantle growth as the extinction increases.
The threshold extinction is determined empirically from the correlation of ice column density (or optical depth) with a measure of the total extinction, usually expressed in terms of the total visual extinction, AV (e.g., Whittet 2003). For example, in the case of the well-studied Taurus dark cloud an apparently linear relation of the form

is found, where q = 1.30 ± 0.04 is the slope and the intercept
measures the threshold extinction (Whittet et al. 2001 and references therein). However, no visual photometry is currently available for our program stars toward L183, and estimates of AV from an infrared color excess such as EJ − K would therefore require an assumption concerning the wavelength-dependence of the extinction law between 0.5 and 2.5 μm. The discussion in Section 3.3 above suggests that such an extrapolation may be hazardous.
To investigate the threshold effect in L183, we plot N(H2O) against EJ − K (Figure 13) and also against τ9.7 (Figure 14). Available data for Taurus and IC 5146 are also shown in each case.10 Comparison of the two plots reveals an unexpected result: L183 shows evidence of a significantly lower threshold relative to the other clouds when EJ − K is used as an extinction measure, but this difference vanishes when τ9.7 is used as an extinction measure. The linear least-squares fits in Figure 14 to L183 data alone and to all clouds over the same N(H2O) range are identical to within the uncertainties. Assuming that silicates and other forms of refractory dust are well-mixed in the ISM, τ9.7 is arguably the more reliable proxy for the total dust column, as it should be insensitive to grain size provided that the particles remain small compared with the wavelength of the silicate absorption feature, and variations with particle shape and composition produce only secondary effects (see van Breemen et al. 2011 for detailed discussion). As previously noted in Section 3.3, the anomalous behavior in the EJ − K versus τ9.7 correlation (Figure 12) seems more readily explicable in terms of factors affecting EJ − K than factors affecting τ9.7. We therefore conclude that Figure 14 presents evidence for common behavior in the development of ice mantles with dust opacity in these three clouds. The threshold silicate optical depth indicated by the fit to the combined data set (solid black line in Figure 14) is τ9.7 = 0.15 ± 0.03, which corresponds to
if the diffuse-ISM AV/τ9.7 ratio is assumed.
Figure 13. Correlation of ice column density N(H2O) with infrared color excess (EJ − K), plotting results for L183 (pink diamonds), Taurus (green circles), and IC 5146 (blue squares). The pink and green lines are linear least-squares fits to the L183 and Taurus data, respectively; the fit to IC 5146 (not shown) lies between the other two and has a slightly steeper slope.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageFigure 14. Similar to Figure 13, but plotting N(H2O) vs. silicate optical depth (τ9.7). Symbols have the same meaning as in Figure 13. The solid pink line is the linear least-squares fit to the L183 data; the dashed black line is the linear least-squares fit to the data for all clouds over the range of N(H2O) observed in L183; the solid black line is the linear least-squares fit to the data for all clouds over the entire range of N(H2O).
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution image5. THE NATURE AND COMPOSITION OF THE ICES TOWARD STAR H
In this section we explore the nature of the ices in L183, focusing on the line of sight to star H for the reasons noted in Section 2.1. The absorption profile of the strong 3.0 μm H2O–ice stretching-mode absorption feature toward this star is particularly well-defined by our observations (Figure 8) and appears generally representative of the cloud, in comparison to other targets with somewhat noisier spectra (Figure 7). Toward star H we also have detections of solid CO (Figure 9) and CO2 (Figure 10), and evidence of weaker ice-related features that include the H2O–ice bending and libration modes and the unidentified 6.85 μm feature (Figure 11). We use observations of the prototypical Taurus field star Elias 16 (Bergin et al. 2005; Chiar et al. 1995; Smith et al. 1989; Whittet et al. 1998, 2007, 2009) as a standard for comparison.
5.1. Profiles
The observed optical-depth profiles of the H2O, CO and CO2 ice features at 3.0, 4.67 and 15.2 μm in Elias 16 are overlaid on those of star H (with appropriate scaling) in Figures 8–10. This comparison shows that the profiles in these two lines of sight are identical to within the observational uncertainties, and consistent with ices in an amorphous state. In particular, structure that would be indicative of crystallization of the ices in response to heating (see, e.g., Smith et al. 1989 and Ehrenfreund et al. 1999 for discussions of the 3.0 μm and 15.2 μm features, respectively) appears to be absent in both lines of sight, as expected for low grain temperatures (≲ 15 K). The excellent signal-to-noise ratio of the 3 μm spectrum of star H (Figure 8) provides a significant test for grain size effects as well as temperature (see Figure 3 in Smith et al. 1989). There is consistency with the Elias 16 profile not only in the position and width of the main feature but also in the extent and depth of the long-wavelength wing attributed to larger grains, suggesting that no major differences exist in the typical size of the ice-mantled grains between the two clouds. The observed profiles of the CO and CO2 ice absorptions in star H are not of high enough quality to justify detailed attempts to deconvolute them into the individual polar and nonpolar components typically used to model the profiles of other (generally brighter) sources such as YSOs (e.g., Pontoppidan et al. 2003, 2008); we simply conclude that the general concordance in profile suggests a distribution similar to that observed in Elias 16 and other well-studied field stars, with most of the CO2 mixed with H2O in the polar ices (e.g., Whittet et al. 2009) and most of the CO in the relatively H2O-poor nonpolar ices (e.g., Chiar et al. 1995).
The Spitzer-IRS optical depth spectra of stars A, D, and H, shown in Figure 11, are adequately modeled by the absorption profiles of amorphous silicates and amorphous H2O–ice (Section 2.4). The resulting ensemble of particles is simulated in each line of sight by submicrometer-sized, irregular (DHS; Min et al. 2007) and spherical (Boogert et al. 2008) shaped silicate and ice grains, respectively. Additionally, simulating the optical depth spectra of stars A and D required gaseous CO and SiO photospheric absorption from M- and K-type background giants, respectively. As the 12.5 μm H2O–ice libration-mode feature is blended with and weaker than the 9.7 μm silicate feature, its strength cannot be reliably and independently determined by fitting spectra of this quality; the peak optical depth of the libration feature used in the models was therefore fixed with respect to that of the 3.05 μm stretching mode in each source: the stretch/libration optical depth ratio is approximately 4.5, based on our models.
The solid-state features in the 5–8 μm region toward star H are modeled (Figure 11) using the empirical component profiles (C1–C5) from Boogert et al. (2008). For comparison, the optical depth spectrum of Elias 16 is also modeled using the same spectral decomposition technique.11 In this formulation, the 6.0 μm feature is composed of components C1 (peaking at 5.84 μm and attributed to C=O carbonyl bonds in ices containing molecules such as H2CO and HCOOH) and C2 (6.18 μm, a blend of absorptions associated with NH3 ices and embedded polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons), superposed on the H2O–ice bending mode. The 6.85 μm feature is also composed of two components, C3 (6.76 μm) and C4 (6.94 μm), which lack specific identifications (an attribution to the NH
ion is sometimes suggested). The fifth component, C5, exhibits a broad profile from 5.5 to 7.8 μm and is also unidentified. Significantly, the strengths of components C4 and C5 correlate with thermal processing (Boogert et al. 2008) and are therefore expected to be weak or absent in cold, quiescent clouds such as L183. The 6.0 μm feature toward star H is modeled satisfactorily by H2O–ice absorption alone and does not require additional absorption by components C1 and C2. This is not particularly surprising as C1 and C2 are only weakly present in Elias 16, which has ice features typically a factor ∼2 stronger, suggesting that they could be present at a level just below our detection limit in star H. The 6.85 μm feature in star H is reasonably well-matched by components C3 and C4, but with a stronger contribution from C4, in contrast to the model for Elias 16. There is no significant C5 component in either case. On the face of it, the unexpectedly large C4 component toward star H suggests thermal processing of the ices in L183, but as there is no other evidence for this, either in our spectra or in the previous literature (e.g., Pagani et al. 2003, 2004), it seems more likely to be a product of the relatively low signal-to-noise ratio of the spectrum within the 5–8 μm range. It would be worthwhile to obtain a higher-quality spectrum in the future.
5.2. A Search for Solid CH3OH
Methanol (CH3OH) is an important species in astrochemistry, representing a significant link in the chain of evolution that leads from simple C-bearing molecules formed at low temperatures in dark clouds to complex organic species synthesized by thermal or energetic processing in the vicinity of young stars (e.g., Öberg et al. 2009). The primary formation mechanism for CH3OH is thought to be hydrogenation of adsorbed CO on grain surfaces (Tielens & Whittet 1997; Watanabe & Kouchi 2002; see Whittet et al. 2011 for detailed discussion and additional references). Abundances of CH3OH in interstellar ices extend from upper limits and weak detections of no more than a few percent relative to H2O in many lines of sight to substantial levels of up to 30% toward some YSOs (Dartois et al. 1999; Pontoppidan et al. 2004). First detections of CH3OH in quiescent regions of dark clouds toward background field stars were reported by Chiar et al. (2011) and Boogert et al. (2011).
Our data allow a limit to be set on the abundance of ice-phase CH3OH in L183. The best constraint is provided by a search for its C–H stretching-mode absorption feature in the IRTF spectrum of star H (Figure 8). The feature observed in other regions is centered at 3.54 μm with a full-width-half-maximum of about 0.04 μm, superposed on the wing of the H2O–ice feature (see Figure 12 in Pontoppidan et al. 2004 for examples). Careful examination of our spectrum shows no evidence for structure that can be identified with CH3OH, to a limiting optical depth of τ3.54 < 0.015. Using a band strength of 5.3 × 10−18 cm molecule−1 (Hudgins et al. 1993) for CH3OH, this corresponds to a column density of <1.1 × 1017 cm−2 and an abundance relative to H2O–ice of <10%. This result is fully consistent with previous findings, which suggest that CH3OH ice is detectable in quiescent molecular clouds only at extinctions AV ≳ 17 (Whittet et al. 2011), substantially higher than that toward star H or others in our sample.
5.3. Correlations
Plots of H2O–ice column density against those of CO and CO2 are shown in Figures 15 and 16, respectively, combining our results for L183 (Table 3) with data from the literature for other clouds. In the case of N(H2O) versus N(CO), the distribution over all clouds is broadly consistent with a linear correlation (solid line in Figure 15; Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.88), displaying a positive intercept on the N(H2O) axis. This intercept is predicted by the accepted general model for mantle growth (Tielens et al. 1991), in which an early H2O-dominated growth phase transitions to a phase dominated by direct freeze-out of CO from the gas: it is thus expected that the grain population in a line of sight passing through a typical cloud may include particles with H2O-rich mantles that lack the more volatile CO-rich mantles, but not conversely. In the case of L183 (star H), N(CO) is marginally higher than predicted by the overall correlation, suggesting CO freeze-out may be more advanced (e.g., in comparison to Taurus; see Section 5.4 below).
Figure 15. Correlation of solid-phase column densities N(CO) vs. N(H2O), comparing our detection toward one line of sight in L183 (pink diamond) with available data for field stars behind other clouds (Chiar et al. 2011; Lentine et al. 2012; Whittet et al. 2007, 2009): Taurus (green circles), IC 5146 (blue square), Serpens (red pentagon). The line is the unweighted linear least-squares fit to the data for all clouds.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageFigure 16. Similar to Figure 15 but plotting N(CO2) vs. N(H2O). Pink inverted triangles represent upper limits on N(CO2) toward two stars in the present study; otherwise, symbols have the same meaning as in Figure 13. The solid line is the unweighted linear least-squares fit to the data for all clouds (ignoring limiting values); the dotted line is the fit to Taurus data only.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageThe N(H2O) versus N(CO2) correlation (Figure 16) is statistically similar but qualitatively different. The unconstrained linear fit to all points (solid line) yields r = 0.89. However, as previously noted (Whittet et al. 2009), there is evidence of systematically lower CO2 abundances in Taurus compared with IC 5146 and Serpens, as suggested by the dotted line fitted to Taurus data alone. The available data for L183 are consistent with either trend. The correlations are consistent with a relatively small (and possibly null) intercept in comparison to that for N(H2O) versus N(CO): this arises from the fact that the majority of the CO2 is expected to be in the polar (water-rich) ice layer, as the result of efficient CO oxidation during the initial phase of mantle growth (Whittet et al. 2009 and references therein).
5.4. Gas-phase CO Depletion
Pagani et al. (2005) used millimeter-wave radio observations of gas-phase CO and other molecules in L183 to investigate the degree to which they are depleted by freeze-out onto dust within the cloud core. They find a rather tight correlation between the J = 1–0 integrated line intensity of C18O and visual extinction for values 0 < AV < 15 (their Figure 10), transitioning to a plateau at higher extinction, indicating that CO becomes strongly depleted at AV ≳ 20. Pagani et al. (2012) subsequently developed a model to predict the behavior of gas-phase CO depletion from observations of the daughter species DCO+ inside prestellar cores: constrained by available observations of L183, the model predicts extreme (effectively 100%) CO depletion within ∼50 arcsec of the central core (see their Figure 3).
Our detections of solid-phase CO and CO2 toward star H show that some CO is also being depleted onto dust in L183 at a somewhat lesser extinction (AV ≈ 12.5) and greater distance (∼180 arcsec) from the central core. Available J = 1–0 and 2–1 spectra provide an estimate of the gas-phase column density toward star H of
, and assuming a C16O/C18O ratio of 560 (Wilson & Rood 1994), this yields

In the solid phase, CO2 forms by oxidation of adsorbed CO, as noted above, and no other CO-bearing species approach the abundances of CO and CO2 in a typical dense cloud (e.g., Gibb et al. 2004; Öberg et al. 2011). Hence, the column density of CO depleted into ices is effectively the sum

(Table 3), and the total (gas plus ice) column density is therefore

Combining these results, the depletion factor is δCO = N(CO)ice/N(CO)total ∼ 0.42 or 42%. This result may be compared with those of our detailed study of CO depletion in the Taurus dark cloud at extinctions AV ≲ 25 (Whittet et al. 2010), in which we find a steady trend of increasing depletion with extinction, reaching typical values of ∼30%–40% at extinctions AV ∼ 12.5, corresponding to that of star H in L183. Overall, it seems probable that CO depletion proceeds in a similar manner in the two clouds, but more observations of solid-phase CO and CO2 in L183 would be needed to determine whether there is a significant quantitative difference.
6. CONCLUSIONS
The primary conclusions of this research are summarized below:
- 1.Interstellar ices are detected for the first time in the prestellar core L183. Solid H2O is detected toward all nine reddened background field stars for which we have spectroscopic data, covering the color-excess range 0.3 < EJ − K < 2.5. The mean composition of the ices in the best-studied line of sight, that toward the background star J15542044−0254073, is H2O:CO:CO2 ≈ 100:40:24, which lies within the range of compositions observed in other dark clouds. The ices are amorphous in structure, indicating that they have been maintained at low temperature (≲ 15 K) since formation.
- 2.The ice-phase column density N(H2O) in L183 correlates with parameters sensitive to the amount of interstellar reddening or extinction in the line of sight, such as the color excess EJ − K and the silicate peak optical τ9.7. A threshold effect analogous to that observed in other clouds is found, indicative of a transition from unmantled grains in the outer layers of the cloud to ice-mantled grains within.
- 3.A comparison of results for L183 and the Taurus and IC 5146 dark clouds is suggestive of common behavior with respect to the correlation of N(H2O) with τ9.7. Both the intercept (which provides a measure of the threshold extinction) and the slope (which measures the ice abundance) are consistent between the three clouds to within the statistical uncertainties.
- 4.Our results support a previous conclusion that the color excess EJ − K does not obey a simple linear correlation with the total column of dust in lines of sight that intercept dense clouds. The most likely explanation is a systematic change in the optical properties of the dust at the relevant wavelengths.
- 5.A catalog of 32 reddened field stars located behind L183 is presented (Table 1) that may be a useful resource for future studies of interstellar matter in this cloud.
It will be important in future work to investigate whether the evidence presented here for convergence of behavior in the occurrence and growth of ice mantles in L183, Taurus, and IC 5146 extends to other quiescent clouds, and to what extent it may be altered by local environment, such as ambient radiation field. It will also be important to further explore the interrelationship of the extinction parameters EJ − K, τ9.7 and AV in L183 and other dark clouds and starless cores, requiring the acquisition of visual-wavelength photometry as well as infrared spectra and photometry for a much larger sample of reddened background stars. As EJ − K is widely used as a measure of extinction, the results could have far-reaching implications.
This research has made use of observations from Spitzer Space Telescope and data from the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which are operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and the California Institute of Technology under contract with NASA. It has also made use of observations obtained with the Infrared Telescope Facility, operated by the University of Hawaii under a Cooperative Agreement with the NASA Science Mission Directorate, Planetary Astronomy Program, and with the United Kingdom Infrared Telescope, formerly operated by the Joint Astronomy Centre on behalf of the Science and Technology Facilities Council of the UK. This research has also made use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center (IPAC), California Institute of Technology, funded by NASA and the National Science Foundation, and from the Cornell Atlas of Spitzer/IRS Sources (CASSIS), a product of the Infrared Science Center at Cornell University, also supported by NASA and JPL. Funding for this research was provided by NASA through awards to Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute from the JPL/Caltech Spitzer General Observer Program, the NASA Exobiology and Evolutionary Biology program, and the NASA Astrobiology Institute. We are grateful to an anonymous referee for helpful comments.
Facilities: IRTF (SPEX) - Infrared Telescope Facility, Spitzer (IRS, IRAC) - Spitzer Space Telescope satellite, UKIRT (CGS2) - United Kingdom Infrared Telescope
Footnotes
- 6
R.A.
, decl. =−02°49'42'', J2000 (SIMBAD database). - 7
- 8
Low-resolution spectra exist in the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive for all nine stars listed in Table 2, of which six were deemed to be of sufficient quality to place useful constraints on interstellar features.
- 9
http://cassis.astro.cornell.edu/atlas; CASSIS is a product of the Infrared Science Center at Cornell University, supported by NASA and JPL.
- 10
At a distance of d ≈ 130 pc, the Taurus dark cloud is, like L183, expected to suffer negligible foreground extinction: an upper limit of AV < 0.5 is implied by the results of the photometric survey of Straizys & Meistas (1980; see their Figure 1). In the case of IC 5146 (d ≈ 950 pc), we estimate AV ≲ 0.8 based on the study of Neckel & Klare (1980; see their Figure 6, Galactic regions 300 and 301).
- 11
We find that our best-fit model to the Elias 16 spectrum is in good general agreement with the results of Boogert et al. (2008), except that our C1 and C2 model components contribute less to the total line of sight extinction, a difference that we attribute to the fact that we have accounted for the intrinsic absorption in the K-type giant photosphere.
















