These proceedings comprise the plenary lectures and poster contributions
of the 'Heinz von Foerster Conference 2011' on Emergent Quantum
Mechanics (EmerQuM11), which was held at the University of Vienna, 11–13
November 2011.
With the 5th International Heinz von Foerster Conference convened
at the occasion of von Foerster's 100th birthday, the organizers
opted for a twin conference to take place at the Large and Small Ceremonial
Halls of the University's main building, respectively. The overall
topic was chosen as 'Self-Organization and Emergence',
a topic to which von Foerster was an early contributor. While the
first conference ('Self-Organization and Emergence in Nature and
Society') addressed a more general audience, the second one ('Emergent
Quantum Mechanics') was intended as a specialist meeting with a contemporary
topic that could both serve as an illustration of von Foerster's intellectual
heritage and, more generally, point towards future directions in physics.
We thus intended to bring together many of those physicists who are
interested in or are working on attempts to understand quantum mechanics
as emerging from a suitable classical (or, more generally, deeper
level) physics.
EmerQuM11 was organized by the Austrian Institute for Nonlinear Studies
(AINS), with essential support from the Wiener Institute for Social
Science Documentation and Methodology (WISDOM), the Department of
Contemporary History at the University of Vienna, and the Heinz von
Foerster-Gesellschaft. There were a number of individuals who contributed
to the smooth course of our meeting and whom I would like to sincerely
thank: Christian Bischof, Thomas Elze, Marianne Ertl, Gertrud Hafner,
Werner Korn, Angelika Krawanja, Florian Krug and his team, Sonja Lang,
Albert Müller, Ilse Müller, Irene Müller, Karl Müller, Armin Reautschnig,
Marion Schirrmacher, Anton Staudinger, Roman Zlabinger, and, last
but not least, my AINS colleagues Siegfried Fussy, Herbert Schwabl
and Johannes Mesa Pascasio, the latter in particular for his
invaluable technical help with these proceedings.
Funds made available by the Federal Ministry of Science and Research
(BMWF), the City of Vienna MA7 Science Funding, the Faculty of Historical
and Cultural Studies, Blaha Office Furniture, and Padma AG Zurich
are gratefully acknowledged.
As for the nature of the search for a 'deeper level' foundation
of quantum mechanics, a first difficulty already arises with respect
to the question: Where do we start? One may look for quite
different points of departure, such as an encompassing theory
of quantum gravity. Or one may find arguments for the necessity to
base one's approach at least on a relativistic formulation of the
problem. Or one may discard searching for general principles for the
time being, and develop an explicit physical model first. And so on.
In fact, this is actually what is happening today in different research
programs for emergent quantum mechanics, a fact which is also reflected
in the rich variety of approaches presented at our meeting. This
may be considered a very welcome situation, reminding us of Heinz
von Foerster's dictum: 'Act always so as to increase the number of
choices.' However, some may view this variety also as a drawback:
There is not (yet?) a single, definite alternative theory that would
challenge orthodox positions, for example, by providing different
experimental predictions. However, the prevailing orthodoxy has shown
throughout the 20th century to the present day, that a too restrictive
attitude towards theoretical alternatives can lead to almost a standstill
in coping with the serious shortcomings and contradictions of present-day
physics. Many of us remember famous quantum physicists repeating in
an almost mantra-like fashion that quantum theory, or experimental
evidence, 'excludes hidden variables as a possibility', along with
a reference to some or other newly found 'impossibility proof'.
Yet we also recall John Bell's famous counter-statement: 'What is
proved by impossibility proofs is lack of imagination.' In this sense,
therefore, our task is to make use of the variety of the different
approaches offered, for it is in scrutinizing each of them that a
chance for further progress and understanding may emerge.
The papers collected in these proceedings essentially follow the order
of the plenary talks during the conference program, with the addition
of the poster presentations. Prior to the contributions to EmerQuM11,
the very first paper of these proceedings presents
the opening lecture by Yves Couder who addressed both twin conferences
with his talk on wave-particle duality in a classical system. (Although
he was not able to participate personally, the contribution of Robert
Carroll, a member of the academic advisory board, is included here.
Regrettably, the lectures by John Bush, Marek Czachor, Mark Everitt,
Felix Finster, and Lee Smolin could not be included, partly for copyright
reasons.) Finally, I would like to thank Sarah Toms and Graham Douglas
and their team at IOP Publishing (Bristol) for their friendly advice
and help during the preparation of these proceedings.
Vienna, April 2012
Gerhard Grössing