This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Close this notification
Environmental Research Letters

Environmental Research Letters covers all of environmental science, providing a coherent and integrated approach including research articles, perspectives and review articles.

All content is published on an open access basis under a CC BY licence and is free to readers, funded by an article publication charge.

Submit an article

Find article

Why publish with ERL?

  • High impact (Impact Factor: 4.5)
  • High article downloads (articles downloaded over 1,600 within 6 months on average)
  • Guaranteed coverage on the Physics World environment and energy section, or via social media.
Find out more about our other author benefits.

Global fossil fuel emissions have climbed upward for a second
New results from the Global Carbon Project and reported in ERL have revealed that renewable energy capacity has hit record levels and global coal use may have already peaked. However the world's carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels increased in 2018, for a second year in a row, and the trend places global warming targets in jeopardy.

New home for environmentalresearchweb
Find out more about this exciting change for ERL's sister website, now the environment and energy section of Physics World.

Highlights of 2017
We're delighted to present our Highlights of 2017, a collection hand-picked by our Editors featuring some of the most pioneering and significant work published in ERL during 2017.

2017 Reviewer Awards
ERL has recognised our list of Outstanding Reviewers for 2017. Congratulations to all those nominated, and to Dr Emily Grubert (University of California, Berkeley), our Reviewer of the Year.

Follow us on Twitter
Follow ERL at @IOPenvironment to find the latest journal articles, news, and updates, as well as author submitted social media abstracts.

Editor's Featured Articles
Our selection of featured articles highlights some of the very best recent work in ERL, as picked by the Editors, and chosen for their originality, significance, scientific impact, and broad appeal.

Focus Collections
Each invited collection serves to highlight the exciting work conducted in specific areas of interest, as identified by the Editorial Board. The majority of the collections also consider unsolicited contributions, please browse our upcoming and ongoing list of collections and contact the journal to enquire about contributing to an issue (erl@iop.org).

More Editorial & News

View all abstracts

The following article is Open access
Implications of a shrinking Great Salt Lake for dust on snow deposition in the Wasatch Mountains, UT, as informed by a source to sink case study from the 13–14 April 2017 dust event

S McKenzie Skiles et al 2018 Environ. Res. Lett. 13 124031

The deposition of dust on snow accelerates melt by perturbing snow albedo, directly by darkening the snow surface and indirectly by enhancing snow grain growth. The snow darkening process impacts hydrology by shifting runoff timing and magnitude. Dust on snow deposition has been documented in the Wasatch Mountains, snowmelt from which accounts for up to 80% of surface water supply for Salt Lake City, UT, but the impact on snow melt has not yet been investigated. Here, we present a case study of a dust event observed in the Wasatch (13–14th April, 2017), sampled coincidentally in the air and at the snow surface at an instrumented high elevation site (Atwater Study Plot, Alta, UT). Atmospheric backtrajectory modeling, the results of which were supported by measurements, showed that dust originated predominantly from the west: the Great Salt Lake Desert and the Great Salt Lake (GSL) dry lake bed. The deposited dust mass accounted for ∼50% of the season total dust loading in snow, and daily mean radiative forcing of 20–50 W m −2 accelerated snow melt by approximately 25%. This has important implications for The Greatest Snow on Earth ®, and snow water resources; the water level of the GSL has been declining, exposing dry lake beds, and there are no legal water rights or protections to maintain lake levels or mitigate dust emission.

The following article is Open access
Global sea-level contribution from Arctic land ice: 1971–2017

Jason E Box et al 2018 Environ. Res. Lett. 13 125012

The Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Program (AMAP 2017) report identifies the Arctic as the largest regional source of land ice to global sea-level rise in the 2003–2014 period. Yet, this contextualization ignores the longer perspective from in situ records of glacier mass balance. Here, using 17 (>55 °N latitude) glacier and ice cap mass balance series in the 1971–2017 period, we develop a semi-empirical estimate of annual sea-level contribution from seven Arctic regions by scaling the in situ records to GRACE averages. We contend that our estimate represents the most accurate Arctic land ice mass balance assessment so far available before the 1992 start of satellite altimetry. We estimate the 1971–2017 eustatic sea-level contribution from land ice north of ∼55 °N to be 23.0 ± 12.3 mm sea-level equivalent (SLE). In all regions, the cumulative sea-level rise curves exhibit an acceleration, starting especially after 1988. Greenland is the source of 46% of the Arctic sea-level rise contribution (10.6 ± 7.3 mm), followed by Alaska (5.7 ± 2.2 mm), Arctic Canada (3.2 ± 0.7 mm) and the Russian High Arctic (1.5 ± 0.4 mm). Our annual results exhibit co-variability over a 43 year overlap (1971–2013) with the alternative dataset of Marzeion et al (2015 Cryosphere 9 2399–404) (M15). However, we find a 1.36× lower sea-level contribution, in agreement with satellite gravimetry. The IPCC Fifth Assessment report identified constraining the pre-satellite era sea-level budget as a topic of low scientific understanding that we address and specify sea-level contributions coinciding with IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (SROCC) ‘present day’ (2005–2015) and ‘recent past’ (1986–2005) reference periods. We assess an Arctic land ice loss of 8.3 mm SLE during the recent past and 12.4 mm SLE during the present day. The seven regional sea-level rise contribution time series of this study are available from AMAP.no.

The following article is Open access
Response of electricity sector air pollution emissions to drought conditions in the western United States

Julio E Herrera-Estrada et al 2018 Environ. Res. Lett. 13 124032

Water is needed for hydroelectric generation and to cool thermoelectric power plants. This dependence on water makes electricity generation vulnerable to droughts. Furthermore, because power sector CO 2 emissions amount to approximately one third of total US emissions, droughts could influence the inter-annual variability of state- and national-scale emissions. However, the magnitude of drought-induced changes in power sector emissions is not well understood, especially in the context of climate mitigation policies. Using multivariate linear regressions, we find that droughts are positively correlated to increases in electricity generation from natural gas in California, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington; and from coal in Colorado, Montana, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. Using a statistical model, we estimate that this shift in generation sources led to total increases in regional emissions of 100 Mt of CO 2, 45 kt of SO 2, and 57 kt of NO x from 2001 to 2015, most of which originated in California, Oregon, Washington, and Wyoming. The CO 2 emissions induced by droughts in California, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington amounted to 7%–12% of the total CO 2 emissions from their respective power sectors, and the yearly rates were 8%–15% of their respective 2030 yearly targets outlined in the Clean Power Plan (CPP). Although there is uncertainty surrounding the CPP, its targets provide appropriate reference points for climate mitigation goals for the power sector. Given the global importance of hydroelectric and thermoelectric power, our results represent a critical step in quantifying the impact of drought on pollutant emissions from the power sector—and thus on mitigation targets—in other regions of the world.

The following article is Open access
Adapting attribution science to the climate extremes of tomorrow

Luke J Harrington and Friederike E L Otto 2018 Environ. Res. Lett. 13 123006

Increasing risks of extreme weather events are the most noticeable and damaging manifestation of anthropogenic climate change. In the aftermath of an extreme event, policymakers are often called upon to make timely and sensitive decisions about rebuilding and managing present and future risks. Information regarding whether, where, and how present day and future risks are changing is needed to adequately inform these decisions. But this information is often not available on the temporal and spatial scales decisions are made. In particular, decision makers require information about both historical changes and plausible future changes in the severity and frequency of extreme weather in a seamless way. However, applying the same methods from event attribution to future projections by defining events based on present day frequency of occurrence leads to potentially misleading estimates of future changes in a warmer climate. We demonstrate that this is fundamentally a consequence of risk ratios saturating at different values. This study investigates the circumstances under which present-day attribution frameworks become ill-suited for characterising changes in future extremes, before discussing what alternative frameworks may be more useful to inform stakeholders about what additional risks from extreme weather events will emerge in a warmer world.

The following article is Open access
The 'pause' in global warming in historical context: (II). Comparing models to observations

Stephan Lewandowsky et al 2018 Environ. Res. Lett. 13 123007

We review the evidence for a putative early 21st-century divergence between global mean surface temperature (GMST) and Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) projections. We provide a systematic comparison between temperatures and projections using historical versions of GMST products and historical versions of model projections that existed at the times when claims about a divergence were made. The comparisons are conducted with a variety of statistical techniques that correct for problems in previous work, including using continuous trends and a Monte Carlo approach to simulate internal variability. The results show that there is no robust statistical evidence for a divergence between models and observations. The impression of a divergence early in the 21st century was caused by various biases in model interpretation and in the observations, and was unsupported by robust statistics.