This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.

Outstanding Paper Awards 2016

Since 1991, Measurement Science and Technology (MST) has awarded a Best Paper prize. The Editorial Board of this journal believe that such a prize is an opportunity to thank authors for submitting their work, and serves as an integral part of the on-going quality review of the journal.

The current breadth of topical areas that are covered by MST has made it advisable to expand the recognition of excellent publications. Hence, since 2005 the Editorial Board have presented 'Outstanding Paper Awards'. This year awards were presented in the areas of Optical and Laser-based Techniques, Measurement Science, Sensors and Sensing Systems, and Biological, Medical and Life Sciences. Although the categories broadly mirror subject sections in the journal, the Editorial Board consider articles from all categories in the selection process.

Article list

Fluid Mechanics

Open access
PIV uncertainty propagation

Andrea Sciacchitano and Bernhard Wieneke 2016 Meas. Sci. Technol. 27 084006

This paper discusses the propagation of the instantaneous uncertainty of PIV measurements to statistical and instantaneous quantities of interest derived from the velocity field. The expression of the uncertainty of vorticity, velocity divergence, mean value and Reynolds stresses is derived. It is shown that the uncertainty of vorticity and velocity divergence requires the knowledge of the spatial correlation between the error of the x and y particle image displacement, which depends upon the measurement spatial resolution. The uncertainty of statistical quantities is often dominated by the random uncertainty due to the finite sample size and decreases with the square root of the effective number of independent samples. Monte Carlo simulations are conducted to assess the accuracy of the uncertainty propagation formulae. Furthermore, three experimental assessments are carried out. In the first experiment, a turntable is used to simulate a rigid rotation flow field. The estimated uncertainty of the vorticity is compared with the actual vorticity error root-mean-square, with differences between the two quantities within 5–10% for different interrogation window sizes and overlap factors. A turbulent jet flow is investigated in the second experimental assessment. The reference velocity, which is used to compute the reference value of the instantaneous flow properties of interest, is obtained with an auxiliary PIV system, which features a higher dynamic range than the measurement system. Finally, the uncertainty quantification of statistical quantities is assessed via PIV measurements in a cavity flow. The comparison between estimated uncertainty and actual error demonstrates the accuracy of the proposed uncertainty propagation methodology.

Optical and Laser-based Techniques

In-flight measurements of propeller blade deformation on a VUT100 cobra aeroplane using a co-rotating camera system

F Boden et al 2016 Meas. Sci. Technol. 27 074013

Knowledge of propeller or rotor blade behaviour under real operating conditions is crucial for optimizing the performance of a propeller or rotor system. A team of researchers, technicians and engineers from Avia Propeller, DLR, EVEKTOR and HARDsoft developed a rotating stereo camera system dedicated to in-flight blade deformation measurements. The whole system, co-rotating with the propeller at its full speed and hence exposed to high centrifugal forces and strong vibration, had been successfully tested on an EVEKTOR VUT 100 COBRA aeroplane in Kunovice (CZ) within the project AIM2—advanced in-flight measurement techniques funded by the European Commission (contract no. 266107). This paper will describe the work, starting from drawing the first sketch of the system up to performing the successful flight test. Apart from a description of the measurement hardware and the applied IPCT method, the paper will give some impressions of the flight test activities and discuss the results obtained from the measurements.

Measurement Science

Measurement of powder bed density in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing processes

G Jacob et al 2016 Meas. Sci. Technol. 27 115601

Many factors influence the performance of additive manufacturing (AM) processes, resulting in a high degree of variation in process outcomes. Therefore, quantifying these factors and their correlations to process outcomes are important challenges to overcome to enable widespread adoption of emerging AM technologies. In the powder bed fusion AM process, the density of the powder layers in the powder bed is a key influencing factor. This paper introduces a method to determine the powder bed density (PBD) during the powder bed fusion (PBF) process. A complete uncertainty analysis associated with the measurement method was also described. The resulting expanded measurement uncertainty, UPBD (k  =  2), was determined as 0.004 g · cm−3. It was shown that this expanded measurement uncertainty is about three orders of magnitude smaller than the typical powder bed density. This method enables establishing correlations between the changes in PBD and the direction of motion of the powder recoating arm.

 

Previous winners

2015, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011

 

Update: certificates presented.

Dr Bernhard Wieneke, left, of LaVision GmbH and Dr Andrea Sciacchitano from Technische Universiteit Delft receiving their award on 19 June 2017 at The 12th International Symposium on Particle Image Velocimetry, in Busan, Korea.














Dr Boleslaw Stasicki of the German Aerospace Centre (DLR), left, receiving his certificate from Professor Pietro Ferraro of MST's Editorial Board.












Dr Alkan Donmez (NIST, left) receiving his certificate from Dr Harald Bosse of MST's Editorial Board.