We present a summary of the Planck constant determinations using the NRC watt balance, now referred to as the NRC Kibble balance. The summary includes a reanalysis of the four determinations performed in late 2013, as well as three new determinations performed in 2016. We also present a number of improvements and modifications to the experiment resulting in lower noise and an improved uncertainty analysis. As well, we present a systematic error that had been previously unrecognized and we have quantified its correction. The seven determinations, using three different nominal masses and two different materials, are reanalysed in a manner consistent with that used by the CODATA Task Group on Fundamental Constants (TGFC) and includes a comprehensive assessment of correlations. The result is a Planck constant of 6.626 070 133(60) ×10 −34 Js and an inferred value of the Avogadro constant of 6.022 140 772(55) ×10 23 mol −1. These fractional uncertainties of less than 10 −8 are the smallest published to date.
J s
(relative standard uncertainty
).
The result is based on over 10 000 weighings of masses with
nominal values ranging from 0.5 kg to 2 kg with the
Kibble balance NIST-4. The uncertainty has been reduced by more
than twofold relative to a previous determination because of three
factors: (1) a much larger data set than previously available,
allowing a more realistic, and smaller, Type A evaluation; (2) a
more comprehensive measurement of the back action of the weighing
current on the magnet by weighing masses up to 2 kg,
decreasing the uncertainty associated with magnet non-linearity;
(3) a rigorous investigation of the dependence of the geometric
factor on the coil velocity reducing the uncertainty assigned to
time-dependent leakage of current in the coil.
g mol
−1, with a relative standard uncertainty
.
From these data and traceable thermometry we estimate the speed of
sound in our sample of helium at
K
and zero pressure to be
m
2 s
−2 and correspondingly deduce the value
J mol
−1 K
−1 for the molar gas constant. We estimate the
value
J K
−1 for the Boltzmann constant using the currently
accepted value of the Avogadro constant
N
A. These estimates of
R and
k, with a relative standard uncertainty of
1.06 × 10
−6, are 1.47 parts in 10
6 above the values recommended by CODATA in 2010.
J⋅K
−1, a result consistent with previous measurements
in our group and elsewhere. The value for
k, which has a relative standard uncertainty of 1.02 ppm,
lies 0.02 ppm below that of the CODATA 2010 adjustment.
,
as in the frequentist analysis in the current GUM. The analysis is
based on assuming that the observations are drawn from a normal
distribution (as in the conventional objective Bayesian analysis),
but uses an informative prior based on lower and upper bounds for
the standard deviation of the sampling distribution for the
quantity under consideration. The main outcome of the analysis is a
closed-form mathematical expression for the factor by which the
standard deviation of the mean observation should be multiplied to
calculate the required standard uncertainty. Metrological examples
are used to illustrate the approach, which is straightforward to
apply using a formula or look-up table.