Abstract
In this paper, we report the discovery of an isolated, peculiar compact cloud with a steep velocity gradient at 26 northwest of Sgr A*. This "Tadpole" molecular cloud is unique owing to its characteristic head-tail structure in the position–velocity space. By tracing the CO J = 3–2 intensity peak in each velocity channel, we noticed that the kinematics of the Tadpole can be well reproduced by a Keplerian motion around a point-like object with a mass of 1 × 105M⊙. Changes in line intensity ratios along the orbit are consistent with the Keplerian orbit model. The spatial compactness of the Tadpole and absence of bright counterparts in other wavelengths indicate that the object could be an intermediate-mass black hole.
Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS
Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
1. Introduction
It is widely accepted that large galaxies host a central supermassive black hole (SMBH) with mass millions to billions times that of the Sun (e.g., Kormendy & Richstone 1995; Kormendy & Ho 2013). A potential scenario for SMBH formation is based on intermediate-mass black holes (IMBHs), which have masses of 102–5 M⊙ (e.g., Mezcua 2017). Thus, detecting and studying IMBHs in detail are essential for understanding the formation and evolution of galactic nuclei. Numerous IMBH candidates have been identified in centers of globular clusters (e.g., Kızıltan et al. 2017), in nuclei of dwarf galaxies (e.g., Reines et al. 2013; Baldassare et al. 2015), or as ultraluminous X-ray sources in extragalaxies (e.g., Farrell et al. 2009).
In the central molecular zone (CMZ) of our Galaxy, a number of compact (d < 5 pc) clouds with extraordinary broad velocity width (ΔV > 50 km s−1) have been detected (e.g., Oka et al. 1998, 1999, 2012, 2022). These peculiar clouds, namely, high-velocity-dispersion compact clouds (HVCCs), have been assumed to be accelerated by supernova explosions, protostellar outflows, and/or cloud-to-cloud collisions (e.g., Oka et al. 2022 ). Subsequently, it was determined that the kinematics of CO–0.40–0.22, which is one of the most energetic HVCCs, can be well reproduced by a cloud being gravitationally kicked by a point-like mass of ∼105 M⊙ (Oka et al. 2016, 2017). The absence of any bright object near the point-like mass suggest that it may be an IMBH. Subsequently, it was also suggested that HVCCs HCN–0.009–0.044 (Takekawa et al. 2019a), HCN–0.085–0.094 (Takekawa et al. 2020), and CO–0.31+0.11 (Takekawa et al. 2019b) were driven by an IMBH. These discoveries yielded a new method of finding nonluminous massive objects, such as inactive and wandering BHs. To date, five IMBH candidates, including IRS13E (Tsuboi et al. 2019), have been reported in the Galactic CMZ.
When searching for gravitationally kicked gas in the CMZ, we noticed an isolated HVCC in the CO J = 3–2 data obtained with the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT; Parsons et al. 2018; Eden et al. 2020). It appears as an isolated compact cloud at (l, b) ≃ (−0090, −0014), which corresponds to ∼26 Galactic northwest of Sgr A* (Figure 1), with LSR velocities between −140 and −90 km s−1. It stands out with its peculiar appearance and very high CO J = 3–2/CO J = 1–0 intensity ratio (R3–2/1–0 = 1.8 Oka et al. 2022 ), which exceeds double of the CMZ average (R3–2/1–0 ∼ 0.7 Oka et al. 2007, 2012). In this paper, we report the discovery of the so-called "Tadpole" molecular cloud, which is listed as id.75 in the catalog of Oka et al. (2022). Throughout this paper, the distance to the Galactic center is assumed to be D = 8.3 kpc (Gravity Collaboration et al. 2018).
2. Data
We first discovered the Tadpole in the JCMT CO J = 3–2 data, and confirmed it in the CO J = 1–0 and CS J = 2–1 line data obtained with the Nobeyama Radio Observatory (NRO) 45 m telescope. These data sets are briefly described below.
2.1. CO J = 3–2 Line
The 12CO J = 3–2 line (345.795990 GHz) observations of the CMZ were performed using the JCMT from 2013 July to 2014 July (Parsons et al. 2018). The Heterodyne Array Receiver Program (Buckle et al. 2009) and autocorrelation spectral imaging system (ACSIS) were used during these observations. The half-power beam width (HPBW) of the telescope was approximately 14'' at 345 GHz. The ACSIS was operated in the 1 GHz bandwidth (976.56 kHz resolution) mode. During these observations, the system noise temperature (Tsys) ranged between 100 and 200 K. The rms noise level of the image cubes was between 0.4 and 0.84 K. The details of the CO J = 3–2 data and JCMT observations are presented in Parsons et al. (2018). We use the data after resampling onto a 75 × 75 × 1 km s−1 grid.
2.2. CO J = 1–0 Lines
The CO J = 1–0 observations of the CMZ were performed using the NRO 45 m telescope (Tokuyama et al. 2019). The 12CO J = 1–0 (115.27120 GHz) line data were obtained from 2011 January 19 to 29 using the 25 beam array receiver system (BEARS; Sunada et al. 2000). As the receiver backend, the AC45 spectrometer system (Sorai et al. 2000) was employed in the 500 MHz bandwidth (0.5 MHz resolution) mode. The 13CO J = 1–0 (110.20135 GHz) line data were obtained from 2016 February to March using the four-beam receiver system on the 45 m telescope (FOREST; Holland et al. 2016). The spectral analysis machine on the 45 m telescope (SAM45; Kamazaki et al. 2012) was operated in the 1 GHz (244.14 kHz resolution) mode. The HPBW of the telescope was approximately 15'' at 115 and 110 GHz. The typical Tsys was ∼800 and 150–300 K during the 12CO and 13CO observations, respectively. The data were resampled onto a 75 × 75 × 2 km s−1 grid. The rms noise levels of the resultant 12CO and 13CO data cubes were 1.0 and 0.2 K in main-beam temperature (TMB), respectively.
2.3. CS J = 2–1 Line
The CS J = 2–1 (97.98096 GHz) line observations of the CMZ were performed during the NRO 45 m Telescope Large Program through 2019 January–May and 2020 January–April. The mapping area was set to −15 ≤ l ≤+15 and −025 ≤ b ≤+025. The FOREST receiver and SAM45 spectrometer were used. The SAM45 was operated in the 1 GHz bandwidth (244.14 kHz resolution) mode. The HPBW of the telescope was ≃19'' at 86 GHz. The Tsys ranged from 150–300 K during the CS J = 2–1 line observations. The data were resampled onto a 75 × 75 × 2 km s−1 grid. The rms noise level of the resultant CS J = 2–1 data cube was 0.14 K in TMB. The details of the CS data and NRO 45 m observations will be presented in the forthcoming paper (S. Takekawa et al. 2022, in preparation).
3. Results
3.1. Spatial and Velocity Structure
Figure 2 shows the spatial and velocity structure of the Tadpole in various molecular lines. The Tadpole appears as a compact, well-defined clump in velocity-integrated maps (Figures 2(a), (c)–(e)). In the CO J = 3–2 integrated map (Figure 2(a)), the FWHM angular diameter of the Tadpole is 28''. This angular diameter is 2 times the angular resolution (14''), corresponding to a distance of 1.1 pc from the Galactic center. In the 13CO J = 1–0 and CS J = 2–1 maps, the Tadpole has angular sizes similar to that depicted in the CO J = 3–2 map, while the 12CO J = 1–0 map depicts an appearance that is larger by a factor of 2 compared with those depicted in the other maps.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageThe velocity extent of the Tadpole is from VLSR ≃ −135 to −90 km s−1 (Figure 2(b)), indicating that it may be in the CMZ. The longitude–velocity behavior of the Tadpole is characterized by a "head-tail" structure, from which its name is derived. It depicts a steep velocity gradient of km s−1 pc−1. The tail is obscure in the 13CO J = 1–0 and CS J = 2–1 data sets. We show the spectra of CO and CS lines in Figure 3.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageWe learned that CO J = 3–2 line can trace the kinematics of the Tadpole best because of its high intensity and well-defined appearance in the l–b–V space. Figure 4 shows the velocity channel maps of CO J = 3–2 emission. The Tadpole appears with an elliptical shape in each velocity channel, changing its angular size with respect to velocity. It has the largest angular size of 36'' × 24'' in the VLSR = −130 to −125 km s−1 channel, while the smallest size of ∼20'' is detected at both velocity ends. These angular sizes, which are comparable to the telescope's HPBWs, indicate that the spatial structure of the Tadpole is not well resolved using these single-dish observations; thus, the actual angular size must be far smaller than those observed.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageThe CO J = 3–2 line emission shows a maximum intensity of 64 K km s−1 in the −130 to −125 km s−1 channel. We identified that the intensity maximum pixel in the Tadpole at each velocity channel continuously changes with respect to velocity. Note that these intensity maximum pixels trace an arc in the plane of the sky (Figure 4, bottom right panel). This behavior will be analyzed in more detail in the discussion section (Section 4.1).
3.2. Physical Parameters
The physical size of the Tadpole was evaluated as the size parameter; defined by to be 2.2 pc. The velocity dispersion was calculated to be σV = 22 km s−1. These give a size–line width coefficient (σV /S0.5) of 15 km s−1 pc−0.5 and virial theorem mass (MVT ≡ 8.7SσV 2/G) of 4.7 × 105 M⊙. The molecular gas mass (Mgas) was estimated by summing the CO J = 3–2 line integrated intensity and using the CO(3–2)-to-H2 conversion factor (XCO 3–2 = 1.4 × 1020 [cm−2 (K km s−1)−1]; Oka et al. 2022 ) to be 6.6 × 102 M⊙. The XCO 3–2 we employed is close to 1 × 1020 that estimated from an large velocity gradient (LVG) calculation for n(H2) = 1 × 104 cm−3, Tk = 60 K, and N(CO)/dV = 1 × 1017 cm−2 ( km s−1)−1. Using the physical parameters described above, we derived the dynamical timescale (tdyn ≡ S/σV ), kinetic energy (Ekin ≡ 1.5Mgas σV 2), and kinetic power (Pkin ≡ Ekin/tdyn) of the Tadpole as 2.2 × 104 yr, 9.4 × 1048 erg, and 1.4 × 1038 erg s−1, respectively. The kinetic power of the Tadpole is equal to 3.7 × 104 L⊙, which is far greater than those of molecular outflows from massive young stellar objects (0.01–100 L⊙; Maud et al. 2015).
The virial theorem mass and molecular gas mass of the Tadpole yield a significantly high virial parameter, MVT/Mgas ∼ 700. This indicates that the Tadpole is not in gravitational equilibrium. Following the method described in Stark et al. (1989), we estimated the self-gravity of the Tadpole and tidal force by the Galactic potential. The self-gravity of the cloud estimated here (∼10−10 m s−2) is 2.5 orders of magnitude weaker than the tidal force (∼4 × 10−8 m s−2). These assessments clearly demonstrate that the Tadpole cannot be bound by its self-gravity. This strongly indicates to the presence of an object with a mass comparable to the virial mass (4.7 × 105 M⊙) inside the Tadpole.
3.3. Multiwavelength View
To search for the driving source behind the Tadpole, we referred to the 1.284 GHz data obtained using MeerKAT (Heywood et al. 2022), mid-infrared data obtained using the Spitzer Space Telescope (Ramirez et al. 2008; Churchwell et al. 2009), and X-ray data obtained at the Chandra X-ray Observatory (Muno et al. 2009).
No radio source brighter than 0.4 mJy beam−1 at 1.284 GHz was detected near the angular extent of the Tadpole, while a faint filament was seen in the Galactic south (Figure 5(a)). In the mid-infrared image (Figure 5(b)), we identified a faint triangular rim which may be the irradiated surface of the Tadpole. Considering the angular resolution of the Spitzer (∼2''), the mid-infrared rim defines the angular extent of the Tadpole better than the CO J = 3–2 appearance. We also checked the ATLASGAL (870 μm) and Hi-GAL (70, 160, 250, 350, and 500 μm) images (Contreras et al. 2013; Molinari et al. 2016), and found no separate feature toward the Tadpole above the sea of intense dust emission. A bright point-like source near the Galactic southwestern edge of the Tadpole is the long-period variable star V4872 Sgr (Matsunaga et al. 2009). In addition, we also identify dozens of point-like, mid-infrared sources toward the Tadpole. The X-ray image also shows numerous faint point-like sources toward the Tadpole (Figure 5(c)). Although the nature of these mid-infrared/X-ray point-like sources is unclear, we will refer to them in the discussion section (Section 4.5). In short, the multiwavelength view confirms the absence of any energetic objects that can drive the Tadpole.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution image4. Discussion
4.1. Tracing Molecular Gas Kinematics
The continuous change in the CO J = 3–2 intensity maximum pixel along the arc with velocity (Section 3.1) suggests that the bulk of warm molecular gas belongs to a certain trajectory, such as a closed orbit. To determine the orbit trajectory accurately, we constructed a CO J = 3–2 data cube with a 2'' × 2'' × 1 km s−1 grid. Then, we calculated the accurate intensity peak position as the CO emission center of gravity using 5 × 5 pixels around the intensity maximum pixel in the Tadpole for each 1 km s−1 width velocity channel.
Figure 6 shows the l–b–V and l–b distributions of the intensity peak position in the Tadpole for each velocity channel. The arc shape apparent in the l–b distribution became clearer than that depicted in Figure 4. The l–b–V distribution demonstrates the striking continuity of peak positions in the velocity direction, indicating that the bulk of warm molecular gas in the Tadpole may predominantly follow a certain closed orbit.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution image4.2. Keplerian Orbit Fitting
The arc-shaped spatial structure and continuous velocity change along the arc suggest that a rotational motion exists. Thus, we expect that the l–b–V behavior of warm molecular gas in the Tadpole can be reproduced by a Keplerian orbit around a point mass. 6 We performed the fitting of a Keplerian orbit to the intensity peak positions (Figure 6) following the method described in Zhao et al. (2009). We determined nine parameters. Five of these parameters are three-dimensional orbital parameters; namely, the semimajor axis (a), eccentricity (e), longitude of ascending node (Ω), argument of pericenter (ω), and inclination angle (i). The remaining parameters are the mass (Mdyn), line-of-sight velocity (Vdyn), and l–b position (l0, b0) of the dynamical center. The distance to the Tadpole is assumed to be same as that to the Galactic center. The χ2 minimization approach was utilized in the l–b–V space. The χ2 consists of two terms, namely, the spatial (χ2 s) and velocity terms (χ2 v). The spatial term is defined by the sum of the orthogonal distances between the peak position and the modeled orbit divided by the square of the positional uncertainty, which was set to 0.15 pc (36). The velocity term is, similarly, the sum of the velocity deviations between those of the peak positions and nearest positions in the modeled orbit divided by a square of the velocity uncertainty, which was set to 1 km s−1.
The best-fit parameters with 1σ uncertainties are listed in Table 1. The l–b–V locus of the orbit is presented in Figure 6. Note that the best-fit solution is bivalent because the orbits with i → (180° − i) and Ω → (Ω + 180°) yield the same l–b–V locus. The fitting result indicates the presence of a point mass of 1.0 × 105 M⊙ in the northwestern periphery of the Tadpole (Figure 6).
Table 1. Parameters of the Best-fit Keplerian Orbit
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Mass (Mdyn) (M⊙) | (1.01 ± 0.05) × 105 |
Semimajor axis (a) (pc) | 0.75 ± 0.01 |
Eccentricity (e) | 0.35 ± 0.03 |
Inclination (i) (deg) | 112 ± 1 |
Argument of pericenter (ω) (deg) | 82 ± 5 |
Longitude of ascending node (Ω) (deg) | −35 ± 1 |
Longitude offset (l0) (deg) | −0.0946 ± 0.0001 |
Latitude offset (b0) (deg) | −0.0146 ± 0.0001 |
Velocity offset (V0) (km s−1) | −114 ± 1 |
Download table as: ASCIITypeset image
4.3. Tidal Stability of the Head
We examined the tidal stability of the head, assuming the Newtonian potential of a point mass, following the method described in Stark et al. (1989). The tidal force caused by the point mass and self-gravity doing work on the head were calculated as functions of the head diameter (Figure 7). A central mass of 1 × 105 M⊙ and head mass of 660 M⊙ were assumed. The curves of the two forces at the pericenter of the best-fit orbit (0.5 pc) intersect at d = 0.14 pc, while those at the apocenter intersect at d = 0.35 pc. Because the observed head diameter (∼1 pc) is larger than the critical value (0.14 pc) by a factor of 7, the Tadpole head is tidally unstable at the pericenter. If the head includes a self-gravitating core smaller than 0.14 pc, it may be able to survive several turns. It is possibly that the Tadpole has been trapped by the gravitational potential of the 105 M⊙ point mass, being stretched by the strong tidal force to form the characteristic head-tail structure. This situation is similar to the simulation of a cloud tidally disrupted by an SMBH (Saitoh et al. 2014). Note that the Tadpole must have been lost its angular momentum to be captured during the encounter with the point mass.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution image4.4. Intensity Ratios along the Orbit
Here, we refer to the CO J = 1–0, CO J = 3–2, and CS J = 2–1 line intensities, as well as CO J = 3–2/CO J = 1–0 (R3–2/1–0) and CS J = 2–1/CO J = 1–0 (RCS/CO) line intensity ratios to examine the Keplerian orbit scenario. The critical densities of the CO J = 1–0, CO J = 3–2, and CS J = 2–1 transitions are approximately 102.5, 104, and 105 cm−3, respectively, while their upper state energies are 5.6, 33, and 7.1 K, respectively. Thus, RCS/CO is sensitive to the variations in density while R3–2/1–0 is affected by both the temperature and density. Figure 8 shows plots of line intensities and intensity ratios along the best-fit orbit. The motion along the orbit increases the orbital phase (ϕ) at all times, where the pericenter of the orbit corresponds to ϕ = 0°.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageBoth ratios exhibit higher values at the head, indicating that both the density and temperature are enhanced there. At the beginning of the tail, ϕ ∼ 170°, R3–2/1–0 demonstrates a prominent peak while RCS/CO does not. This suggest that the temperature is enhanced at the beginning of the tail. Then, both ratios decrease toward the tip of the tail. The higher temperature in the head may have been caused by the shock occurring at the first encounter with the point mass. This shock may be caused by collisions of gas clumps at the pericenter, where adjacent orbits are very close. In a fluid mechanical treatment, the same process is described as the "tidal compression" (Saitoh et al. 2014). The gas accumulation near the apocenter and/or the presence on a self-gravitating core can cause the higher density in the head. The tail may be really the low-density, tidally stretched tail of the head. The temperature increase at the beginning of the tail could be caused by another shock at the congestion near the apocenter. Thus, the behaviors of intensity ratios are consistent with the Keplerian orbit scenario for the Tadpole.
4.5. What is a Point Mass?
The Keplerian orbit model requires the presence of a huge point mass at the dynamical center. What is this point-like massive object? The mass of 105 M⊙ is larger than the Arches or Quintuplet clusters (∼104 M⊙ Figer et al. 1999a, 1999b). According to the best-fit model, a mass of 105 M⊙ must be concentrated within a radius significantly smaller than 0.5 pc (the pericenter distance), resulting in an average mass density higher than that of the Arches cluster (ρ ∼ 2 × 105 M⊙ pc−3 Espinoza et al. 2009). Anyway, the absence of a bright infrared counterpart toward the Tadpole (Ramirez et al. 2008; Churchwell et al. 2009; Molinari et al. 2011) clearly rules out a stellar cluster from being a candidate for the point mass.
The most promising candidate for the point-like massive object in the Tadpole may be an IMBH. We searched for a counterpart for this point mass referring to X-ray images (Section 3.3). Figure 9 shows the positions of point-like sources in the X-ray images superimposed on the composite mid-infrared images around (l, b) = (l0, b0). The small statistical uncertainties in the l–b position of the dynamical center (Table 1) should be considered with some caution because the entire gas mass in the Tadpole is not confined within the single closed orbit. Notice that three point-like sources in the X-ray and mid-infrared reside within a 5'' (∼10 times of the positional ambiguity of the dynamical center) angular distance from (l0, b0) (Table 2). One source, SSTGC 489898, is apparent in both X-ray and mid-infrared images. The X-ray detected sources, SSTGC 489898 and CXOGC 174526.9–290124, exhibit hard spectra, indicating that they may be at the same distance to the Galactic center. No time variation has been detected from these sources (Zhu et al. 2018). If we assume the standard accretion disk model (L = c2/12), their X-ray luminosities correspond to ∼ 1 × 10−14 M⊙ yr−1. This very low mass accretion rate could be a challenge to our interpretation. Anyway, we suppose these three point-like sources are candidates for the luminous counterpart of the point mass. Although we currently have very little knowledge on these point-like sources, they should be considered as candidates for an IMBH in future studies.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageTable 2. Properties of X-Ray and Mid-infrared Sources near the Point Mass
l | b | F2–10keV a | [3.6 μm] b | [4.5 μm] b | [5.8 μm] b | [8.0 μm] b | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ID | |||||||
(deg) | (deg) | (10−18 W m−2) | (mag) | (mag) | (mag) | (mag) | |
SSTGC 489898 b | –0.09513 | –0.01486 | 1.66 | 10.284 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ |
SSTGC 490125 b | –0.09384 | –0.01444 | ⋯ | 9.154 | 9.003 | 8.422 | 8.217 |
CXOGC 174526.9–290124 c | –0.09400 | –0.01346 | 16.72 | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ | ⋯ |
Notes.
a The X-ray (2–10 keV) energy flux quoted from Zhu et al. (2018). b The source IDs and mid-infrared magnitudes are quoted from Ramirez et al. (2008). c The source ID defined in Muno et al. (2009).Download table as: ASCIITypeset image
5. Conclusions
We have discovered the so-called Tadpole, which is an isolated, peculiar compact cloud with an extraordinary velocity width and very high CO J = 3–2/J = 1–0 intensity ratio, at northwest of Sgr A*. Our main conclusions can be summarized as follows:
- 1.The Tadpole molecular cloud has a size of ∼1 pc at the distance to the Galactic center and a velocity width of ∼50 km s−1.
- 2.It demonstrates the characteristic "head-tail" structure in position–velocity space, having a steep velocity gradient of 16 km s−1 pc−1.
- 3.Its kinematics is well reproduced by a Keplerian motion around a point-like object with a mass of 1 × 105 M⊙.
- 4.It is plausible that the Tadpole has been trapped by the gravitational potential of the huge point mass, now being stretched by the strong tidal force.
- 5.The behaviors of line intensity ratios (R3–2/1–0 and RCS/CO) are consistent with the Keplerian orbit scenario.
- 6.The absence of bright objects near the putative point-like object suggests that the object is an inactive IMBH.
These results are based on molecular line maps with 14''–19'' resolutions obtained using single-dish telescopes. Future aperture synthesis observations of molecular lines with millimeter/submillimeter arrays will be able to delineate the orbit stream directly, increasing the reliability of the Keplerian orbit model for the Tadpole.
The results presented in this paper are based on data obtained using the Nobeyama Radio Observatory (NRO) 45 m telescope and James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT). The NRO 45 m radio telescope is operated by the Nobeyama Radio Observatory, a division of the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.
The James Clerk Maxwell Telescope is operated by the East Asian Observatory on behalf of The National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, National Astronomical Research Institute of Thailand, and Center for Astronomical Mega-Science (as well as the National Key R&D Program of China with No. 2017YFA0402700). Additional funding support is provided by the Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom, and participating universities and organizations in the United Kingdom and Canada.
We are grateful to the NRO staff and all members of the JCMT team for operating the telescope. T.O. acknowledges the financial support of JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) No. 20H00178. S.T. acknowledges support from JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists grant No. JP19K14768.
Footnotes
- 6
Here we do not consider parabolic or hyperbolic orbits, although the orbit could not be an elliptical.