This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.

The following article is Open access

Lanthanide Features in Near-infrared Spectra of Kilonovae

, , , , , and

Published 2022 October 26 © 2022. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.
, , Citation Nanae Domoto et al 2022 ApJ 939 8 DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8c36

Download Article PDF
DownloadArticle ePub

You need an eReader or compatible software to experience the benefits of the ePub3 file format.

0004-637X/939/1/8

Abstract

The observations of GW170817/AT2017gfo have provided us with evidence that binary neutron star mergers are sites of r-process nucleosynthesis. However, the observed signatures in the spectra of GW170817/AT2017gfo have not been fully decoded, especially in the near-infrared (NIR) wavelengths. In this paper, we investigate the kilonova spectra over the entire wavelength range with the aim of elemental identification. We systematically calculate the strength of bound–bound transitions by constructing a hybrid line list that is accurate for important strong transitions and complete for weak transitions. We find that the elements on the left side of the periodic table, such as Ca, Sr, Y, Zr, Ba, La, and Ce, tend to produce prominent absorption lines in the spectra. This is because such elements have a small number of valence electrons and low-lying energy levels, resulting in strong transitions. By performing self-consistent radiative transfer simulations for the entire ejecta, we find that La iii and Ce iii appear in the NIR spectra, which can explain the absorption features at λ ∼ 12000–14000 Å in the spectra of GW170817/AT2017gfo. The mass fractions of La and Ce are estimated to be >2 × 10−6 and ∼(1–100) × 10−5, respectively. An actinide element Th can also be a source of absorption as the atomic structure is analogous to that of Ce. However, we show that Th iii features are less prominent in the spectra because of the denser energy levels of actinides compared to those of lanthanides.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

1. Introduction

Binary neutron star (NS) mergers are promising sites of rapid neutron capture nucleosynthesis (r-process, e.g., Lattimer & Schramm 1974; Eichler et al. 1989; Meyer 1989; Freiburghaus et al. 1999; Goriely et al. 2011; Korobkin et al. 2012; Wanajo et al. 2014). Radioactive decay of freshly synthesized nuclei in the ejected neutron-rich material powers electromagnetic emission called a kilonova (Li & Paczyński 1998; Metzger et al. 2010; Roberts et al. 2011). In 2017, together with the detection of gravitational waves (GW) from an NS merger (GW170817, Abbott et al. 2017a), an electromagnetic counterpart was identified (AT2017gfo, Abbott et al. 2017b). The observed properties of AT2017gfo in ultraviolet, optical, and near-infrared (NIR) wavelengths are consistent with the theoretical expectation of a kilonova (e.g., Arcavi et al. 2017; Coulter et al. 2017; Evans et al. 2017; Pian et al. 2017; Smartt et al. 2017; Utsumi et al. 2017; Valenti et al. 2017). The electromagnetic counterpart has provided us with evidence that NS mergers are sites of r-process nucleosynthesis (e.g., Kasen et al. 2017; Perego et al. 2017; Shibata et al. 2017; Tanaka et al. 2017; Kawaguchi et al. 2018; Rosswog et al. 2018).

It is important to reveal the abundance pattern in NS merger ejecta. However, the elemental abundances synthesized in GW170817 are not yet clear. One of the direct ways of finding the synthesized elements is the identification of absorption lines in photospheric spectra. Watson et al. (2019) analyzed the observed spectra of GW170817/AT2017gfo a few days after the merger. Based on spectral calculations above the photosphere, they found that the absorption features around λ ∼ 8000 Å could be explained by the Sr ii lines (see also Gillanders et al. 2022). Domoto et al. (2021) carried out self-consistent radiative transfer simulations of the entire ejecta, and also showed that Sr ii produces strong absorption lines. Perego et al. (2022) suggested the presence of He as an alternative explanation of the features around λ ∼ 8000 Å, but ultimately concluded that this was unlikely. While the observed spectra exhibit several features, especially at NIR wavelengths, no other element has yet been identified (see Gillanders et al. 2021 for a search of Pt and Au).

Synthesized elements can also be identified in the spectra during the nebula phase because of the appearance of emission lines. In GW170817, the Spitzer space telescope detected the late-time nebular emission at 4.5 μm and put an upper limit at 3.6 μm, suggesting distinctive spectral features (Villar et al. 2018; Kasliwal et al. 2022). Recently, Hotokezaka et al. (2021) and Pognan et al. (2022a, 2022b) have initiated work on the nebula phase of a kilonova. Although conclusive identification of elements has not been made with the spectra, it is suggested that the IR nebula emission in GW170817 can be explained mainly by the lines of Se (Z = 34) or W (Z = 74) (Hotokezaka et al. 2022).

One of the issues facing the study of kilonova spectra is a lack of atomic data for heavy elements. To extract elemental information from the spectra, spectroscopically accurate atomic data are needed. However, since such atomic data are not complete, especially for heavy elements at NIR wavelengths, we have been able to investigate lines only at the optical wavelengths, λ ≲ 10000 Å (Watson et al. 2019; Domoto et al. 2021). Although the incompleteness of the data can be mitigated by theoretical calculations (e.g., Kasen et al. 2013; Tanaka et al. 2018, 2020; Banerjee et al. 2020; Fontes et al. 2020; Pognan et al. 2022b), such theoretical data require calibration with experimental data for quantitative discussion on spectral features, due to the low accuracy in wavelengths (Gillanders et al. 2021).

In this paper, we propose a new scheme to investigate the spectral features over the whole wavelength range with the aim of elemental identification in kilonova photospheric spectra. In Section 2, we systematically calculate the strength of bound–bound transitions by means of a simple one-zone model using theoretical atomic data. By combining atomic data based on theoretical calculations and experiments, we construct a new hybrid line list that is accurate for important strong transitions and complete for weak transitions. Then, in Section 3, we perform radiative transfer simulations of NS merger ejecta with the new line list. In Section 4, we discuss the estimated lanthanide abundances in GW170817/AT2017gfo and the possibilities of identifying actinide elements. Finally, we give our conclusions in Section 5.

2. Line List

To evaluate the strength of bound–bound transitions in NS merger ejecta, we essentially need atomic data. In this paper, a data set of transition wavelength, energy level of transition, and transition probability is referred to as a line list.

For theoretical calculations of kilonova light curves, atomic data obtained from theoretical calculations have been often used (e.g., Kasen et al. 2013; Tanaka et al. 2018, 2020; Banerjee et al. 2020; Fontes et al. 2020). This is useful in terms of completeness of the transition lines, because the opacity of ejecta should be correctly evaluated for light curve calculations. However, while such theoretical data give a reasonable estimate for the total opacity, they are not necessarily accurate in transition wavelengths, and thus, not suitable for element identification.

Domoto et al. (2021) used the latest line list constructed from the Vienna Atomic Line Database (VALD; Piskunov et al. 1995; Kupka et al. 1999; Ryabchikova et al. 2015) to focus on the imprint of elemental abundances in kilonova spectra. This database is suitable for identifying lines because the atomic data are calibrated with experiments and semiempirical calculations. Since most spectroscopic experiments have been conducted in the optical range, there is enough data to investigate spectral features at optical wavelengths. However, such an experimental line list is not necessarily complete in the NIR region.

Here, we propose a new scheme to take advantage of both line lists. By using a complete line list constructed from theoretical calculations, we first identify which elements can show strong transitions under the physical conditions of NS merger ejecta. Then, we calibrate the theoretical energy levels with experimental data and construct an accurate line list for the selected ions with strong transitions. In this way, we construct a hybrid line list that is complete for weak transitions and accurate for strong transitions, which are important for element identification.

2.1. Candidate Species

To investigate which elements can become absorption sources in kilonova photospheric spectra, we systematically calculate the strength of bound–bound transitions for a given density, temperature, and element abundances. The strength of a line is approximated by the Sobolev optical depth (Sobolev 1960) for each bound–bound transition,

Equation (1)

in homologously expanding ejecta. The Sobolev approximation is valid for matter with a high expansion velocity and a large radial velocity gradient. Here, ni,j,k is the number density of ions at the lower level of a transition (i-th element, j-th ionization stage, and k-th excited state), fl and λl are the oscillator strength and the transition wavelength, g0 is the statistical weight at the ground state, and gk and Ek are the statistical weight and the lower energy level of a bound–bound transition, respectively. As in previous work on kilonovae (e.g., Barnes & Kasen 2013; Tanaka & Hotokezaka 2013), we assume local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE); we solve the Saha equation to obtain ionization states, and assume Boltzmann distribution for the population of excited levels, which appears in Equation (1) (see Pognan et al. 2022a for non-LTE effects).

For the abundances in the ejected matter from an NS merger, we use the same model as in Domoto et al. (2021) based on a multicomponent free-expansion (mFE) model of Wanajo (2018). Here, we use the Light (L) model as our fiducial model (the left panel of Figure 1), which exhibits a similar abundance pattern to that of metal-poor stars with weak r-process signature (e.g., HD 122563, Honda et al. 2006, the right panel of Figure 1). This is motivated by the fact that the blue emission of GW170817/AT2017gfo a few days after the merger is suggested to have stemmed from the ejecta component dominated by relatively light r-process elements (e.g., Arcavi et al. 2017; Nicholl et al. 2017; Tanaka et al. 2017, 2018). Although the model includes the abundances with the atomic number of Z = 1–110, we use only the abundances at t = 1.5 days with Z = 20–100 in our calculations as shown in the right panel of Figure 1. The mass fractions of elements relevant to this study are summarized in Table 1. Note that the calculated abundances, which are recomputed with an updated nucleosynthesis code (Fujibayashi et al. 2020, 2022), slightly differ (within a factor of 2 at 1.5 days) from those presented in Domoto et al. (2021). We have confirmed that our new nucleosynthetic abundances give almost the same results as those in Domoto et al. (2021).

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Left: final abundances of our L model as a function of mass number. Black circles show the r-process residual pattern (Prantzos et al. 2020), which are scaled to match those for the L model at A = 88. Right: abundances at t = 1.5 days as a function of atomic number. Abundances of an r-process-deficient star HD 122563 (diamonds, Honda et al. 2006; Ge from Cowan et al. 2005; Cd and Lu from Roederer et al. 2012) are also shown for comparison, and are scaled to match those for the L model at Z = 40.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 1. Mass Fractions of Selected Elements in the L Model

X(Ca) X(Sr) X(Y) X(Zr) X(Ba) X(La) X(Ce) X(Th) X(La+Ac) a
1.8 × 10−2 6.8 × 10−3 1.6 × 10−3 6.4 × 10−2 1.5 × 10−4 5.4 × 10−5 3.1 × 10−5 1.8 × 10−5 4.9 × 10−4
1.3 × 10−2 1.5 × 10−2 2.0 × 10−3 8.8 × 10−3 9.9 × 10−5 8.5 × 10−5 4.2 × 10−5 1.0 × 10−5 6.7 × 10−4

Notes. The top and bottom rows show the final abundances and those at t = 1.5 days, respectively.

a Sum of mass fractions for lanthanides (Z = 57–71) and actinides (Z = 89–100).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

For the atomic data, we use a theoretical line list from Tanaka et al. (2020). This line list was constructed for the elements with Z = 30–88 from neutral atoms up to triply ionized ions by systematic atomic structure calculations using the HULLAC code (Bar-Shalom et al. 2001). Since transition data of this line list are not necessarily accurate in terms of wavelengths, we here only study the species of ions to produce strong transitions.

Note that the theoretical line list does not include the data for actinides (Z = 89–100) due to the difficulty of atomic structure calculations (Tanaka et al. 2020). While actinides just work as zero-opacity sources without atomic data, we keep these elements in the list to discuss the spectral features of actinides in Section 4.2.

The strength of bound–bound transitions at t = 1.5 and 3.5 days for the L model is shown in the top panels of Figure 2. We evaluate the Sobolev optical depth for the density of ρ = 10−14 g cm−3 and the temperature of T = 5000 K at t = 1.5 days, and ρ = 10−15 g cm−3 and T = 3000 K at t = 3.5 days. These are typical values in the line-forming region when we adopt the abundance distribution of the L model (see Figure 6).

Figure 2.

Figure 2. Sobolev optical depth of bound–bound transitions for the L model calculated with the theoretical line list (Tanaka et al. 2020 Z = 30–88, top) and those calculated with the hybrid line list (Z = 20–88, bottom, Section 2.3). The ions with large contributions are shown with colors. The left panels show the results with the density of ρ = 10−14 g cm−3 and the temperature of T = 5000 K at t = 1.5 days, while the right panels show those with ρ = 10−15 g cm−3 and T = 3000 K at t = 3.5 days.

Standard image High-resolution image

We find that, among all the elements, Y ii, Zr ii, La iii, and Ce iii lines are as strong as the Sr ii triplet lines under the condition at t = 1.5 days. On the other hand, under the condition at t = 3.5 days, Y i, Zr i, and Ba ii lines appear instead of Zr ii, La iii, and Ce iii lines. Although the individual lines of Zr i are not by far the strongest, they can be important absorption sources due to the fact that the multiple lines show comparable strength at a certain wavelength range.

The behavior of the strength of the lines can be understood as the dependence of the Sobolev optical depths on temperature and density (Figure 4 of Domoto et al. 2021). When the density is ρ = 10−14–10−15 g cm−3, the strength of Sr ii triplet lines does not show a large difference between T = 3000 and 5000 K. This is determined by the combination of the ionization fraction and the population of the levels at these temperatures. While the lines of singly ionized Sr (Z = 38) are not largely affected in this temperature range, the lines of neutral Y (Z = 39) and Zr (Z = 40) appear at T = 3000 K. This is due to the slightly higher ionization potentials of Y and Zr. On the other hand, the strength of Ce iii lines largely changes in this temperature range reflecting the ionization fraction. Most Ce atoms are singly ionized at T = 3000 K, and thus, the lines of Ce iii become weaker at a lower temperature. The behavior of Ba ii (Z = 56) and La iii (Z = 57) lines can be explained in a similar way to that of Ce iii (Z = 58).

2.2. Atomic Properties

Although our line list includes all elements with Z = 30–88, our results indicate that only a few elements, such as Sr, Y, Zr, Ba, La, and Ce can become strong absorption sources in the spectra. The reason can be interpreted by the atomic properties of these elements. From Equation (1), the necessary conditions for a given line to become strong are that (1) the transition probability (gk fl ) is high and (2) the lower energy level of the transition (Ek ) is low (i.e., the level population is high).

The left panel of Figure 3 shows the mean values of log gf for all the lines of singly ionized ions as a function of atomic number. The mean gf-values show the pattern according to the orbital angular momentum l of the valence shell. This is more understandable when we use the complexity of a given ion, defined as (Kasen et al. 2013):

Equation (2)

where g = 2(2l + 1) is the number of magnetic sublevels in the subshell with orbital angular momentum l, and nm is the number of electrons in the nl-orbital labeled m. The complexity indicates how dense the energy levels are packed, and takes the maximal value when filling half the closed shell (Figure 1 of Kasen et al. 2013). Figure 4 shows the number of lines and the mean value of log gf for singly ionized ions as a function of complexity. We find that the complexity shows a positive correlation with the number of lines. It is natural because the number of transition combinations increases for larger complexity, i.e., denser energy levels. We also find that the complexity shows a negative correlation with the mean gf-value. This can be understood by the sum rule of oscillator strength; when the ion has a larger number of transitions, the oscillator strength of each line tends to be smaller. Other ionization states are not presented in Figure 4, but show similar trends. Therefore, the ions with relatively low complexity are likely to have transitions with relatively high gf-values.

Figure 3.

Figure 3. Mean values of log gf (left) and of lower energies of transitions (right) for all the lines of singly ionized ions as a function of atomic number. Colors at the top show the valence shells with the orbital angular momenta l for singly ionized ions. Red circles indicate the elements that produce strong transitions in our analysis (see the text).

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 4.

Figure 4. The number of lines (orange) and mean value of log gf (green) for singly ionized ions as a function of complexity.

Standard image High-resolution image

The right panel of Figure 3 shows the mean values of the lower energy levels of transitions for all the lines of singly ionized ions as a function of atomic number. The mean lower energy level of transitions tends to be pushed up toward higher energy as atomic number increases in an electron shell series. Other ionization states also show similar behavior. As spin–orbit interaction energy strongly depends on atomic number, energy-level spacing at a certain shell increases with atomic number. Also, electron orbital radii become smaller as atomic number increases, so that electron–electron interaction energies become higher for larger atomic numbers. As a result, the distribution of energy levels becomes wider for larger atomic numbers at a given shell (Tanaka et al. 2020). Therefore, the ions with smaller atomic numbers in a certain period on the periodic table tend to have transitions from low-lying energy levels.

Consequently, it is natural that Sr, Y, Zr, Ba, La, and Ce show strong lines. According to the two properties mentioned above, the ions on the left side of the periodic table are anticipated to show strong lines. In fact, all of the elements showing strong lines belong to groups 2 to 4 on the periodic table; in other words, they have a relatively small number of valence electrons (low complexity) and relatively low-lying energy levels.

Among these ions, La iii and Ce iii show strong lines at the NIR wavelengths (Figure 2). This can be understood from the properties of lanthanide elements. While lanthanide elements are characterized by having the 4f-electrons, the configurations of low-lying energy levels for lanthanides also involve the outer 5d and 6s shells. This means that the energy scales of 4f, 5d, and 6s orbitals for lanthanides are similar; in other words, the energy differences between these orbitals are small. In fact, the strong transitions of La iii and Ce iii at the NIR wavelengths involve an electron jump between 4f and 5d orbitals (see Tables 3 and 4). Thus, it is natural that La iii and Ce iii lines tend to appear in the NIR region.

2.3. Construction of Hybrid Line List

We find that Y, Zr, Ba, La, and Ce, as well as Sr, can show strong lines under the physical conditions of NS merger ejecta. To enable us to inspect absorption lines produced by these elements in kilonova photospheric spectra, we calibrate the energy levels and resulting transition wavelengths of theoretical atomic data with experimental data. The details for calibration procedures are given in Appendix A.

To use the calibrated lines in radiative transfer simulations (Section 3), we need their transition probabilities. After calibrating the energy levels and wavelengths, the transition probabilities of the calibrated lines are taken from the VALD database (Piskunov et al. 1995; Kupka et al. 1999; Ryabchikova et al. 2015) or Kurucz's atomic data (Kurucz 2018) if the lines are listed, otherwise theoretical values from Tanaka et al. (2020) are adopted. The general validity of the theoretical transition probabilities is discussed in Appendix A. The transitions with the theoretical transition probabilities are summarized in Tables 34 (Appendix A).

Finally, we construct a hybrid line list by combining the VALD database for Z = 20–29 and the results of atomic calculations from Tanaka et al. (2020) for Z = 30–88. Among the data of Z = 30–88, strong transitions of Sr ii, Y i, Y ii, Zr i, Zr ii, Ba ii, La iii, and Ce iii are replaced with those calibrated with experimental data. The information for the hybrid line list is summarized in Table 2. The bottom panels of Figure 2 show the strength of bound–bound transitions at t = 1.5 and 3.5 days calculated with the new hybrid line list. In these panels, the wavelengths of strong transitions are accurate as they are calibrated with experimental data. We find that La iii and Ce iii lines become strong absorption sources at the NIR wavelengths at t = 1.5 days. For Y i, Y ii, Zr i, Zr ii, and Ba ii, most of the wavelengths of relatively strong lines are found to be placed in the optical region (λ < 10000 Å). Thus, their lines are unlikely to produce absorption features in the NIR region, although they may be important absorption sources at the optical wavelengths (see Section 3).

Table 2. Summary of the Hybrid Line List

 Element a IonReference
   LevelsTransitions
Baseline Z = 20–29 iiv 1
  Z = 30–88 iiv 2
  Z = 89–100 no lines
Calibrated ionsSr (Z = 38) ii 31
 Y (Z = 39) i, ii 31
 Zr (Z = 40) i, ii 34
 Ba (Z = 56) ii 31
 La (Z = 57) iii 32
 Ce (Z = 58) iii 32
Section 4.2 Th (Z = 90) iii 1 (optical)
   33, 5 (NIR) b

Notes.

a Elements of Z = 20–100 are used for all the calculations in this paper. b Relative intensities are used to estimate the transition probabilities (see Section 4.2). References: (1) VALD (Piskunov et al. 1995; Kupka et al. 1999; Ryabchikova et al. 2015); (2) Tanaka et al. (2020); (3) NIST Atomic Spectral Database (Kramida et al. 2021); (4) Kurucz's atomic data (Kurucz 2018); (5) Engleman (2003).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

We adopt the theoretical transition probabilities when they are not available in the VALD database or Kurucz's line list. To validate the accuracy of theoretical gf-values for NIR lines, we use the relative intensities of Ce iii lines. Johansson & Litzén (1972) measured the emission lines of Ce iii at the NIR wavelengths in a laboratory and showed the relative intensities of measured lines. Assuming LTE for ionization and excitation, the intensity of an emission line can be calculated as

Equation (3)

where A, gu , and Eu are Einstein's A coefficient, the statistical weight, and the energy level of the upper level for a transition, respectively, and b is a constant depending on the ion species. Since plasma in experiments is typically in LTE due to the high density of ions (Kielkopf 1971), we can use this formula to evaluate the gf-values of Ce iii lines.

A comparison between the intensities of Ce iii lines calculated with the theoretical transition probabilities and those measured by experiments (Johansson & Litzén 1972) is shown in Figure 5. We adopt the temperature of T = 12000 K, which is a typical plasma temperature in experiments (Kielkopf 1971). Here a normalization factor b is set so that the calculated values are close to the experimental values. We find that the calculated and experimentally measured intensities are in good agreement except for a few lines. Since in the situation we consider (Eu ≲ 2 eV), the intensities are mainly determined by transition probabilities, the trend suggests that our theoretical gf-values of Ce iii lines are reasonable. We note that, although the gf-values of a few lines should be higher than our estimates (blue circles in Figure 5), they are relatively weak and do not affect our conclusions. Nevertheless, to determine the exact values of transition probabilities for these lines, more experimental and observational calibrations are necessary for the NIR region.

Figure 5.

Figure 5. Comparison of intensities for NIR Ce iii lines between those calculated with theoretical gf-values and those measured by experiments (Johansson & Litzén 1972). Gray dashed and dotted lines correspond to perfect agreement and deviations by a factor of 3, respectively. Blue circles indicate the lines whose theoretical gf-values are underestimated more than a factor of 3.

Standard image High-resolution image

3. Synthetic Spectra

3.1. Methods

In this section, we calculate realistic synthetic spectra of kilonovae by using the new hybrid line list. We use a wavelength-dependent radiative transfer simulation code (Tanaka & Hotokezaka 2013; Tanaka et al. 2014, 2017, 2018; Kawaguchi et al. 2018, 2020). The photon transfer is calculated by the Monte Carlo method. To compute the opacity for bound–bound transitions, we adopt the expansion opacity (Karp et al. 1977) and use the formula from Eastman & Pinto (1993):

Equation (4)

where τl is the Sobolev optical depth (Equation (1)). In the equation, the summation is taken over all transitions within a wavelength bin Δλ (see below). The Sobolev optical depth is evaluated by assuming LTE for ionization and excitation as in Section 2.1.

For the atomic data, we use the new hybrid line list constructed in Section 2.3. The hybrid line list still includes weak transitions whose wavelengths are not necessarily accurate. To avoid the substantial effects of these lines on spectra, we adopt a wide wavelength grid for the opacity calculation with the atomic data from theoretical calculations (i.e., lines for Z = 30–88). The wavelength grid is typically set to Δλ = 10 Å (Tanaka & Hotokezaka 2013), but here a 20 times wider grid is adopted for the theoretical line list. This smears out the individual effect of each line on the bound–bound opacity. We also performed the same opacity calculations with the typical fine wavelength grid, and confirmed that the resultant total opacity is almost unchanged. For the accurate transitions (i.e., lines for Z = 20–29 and calibrated lines), we adopt Δλ = 10 Å. By combining the opacity calculated with the theoretical atomic data and the strong transitions calculated with the accurate data, we are able to discuss whole spectral features, i.e., an overall shape, absorption lines, and their time evolution.

In the radiative transfer code, the temperature in each cell is determined by the photon flux (Lucy 2003; Tanaka & Hotokezaka 2013). The photon intensity is evaluated as

Equation (5)

where epsilon is the comoving-frame energy of a photon packet. The temperature is estimated by assuming that the wavelength-integrated intensity 〈J〉 = ∫Jν d ν follows the Stefan–Boltzmann law, i.e.,

Equation (6)

The kinetic temperature of electrons Te is assumed to be the same as the radiation temperature TR , i.e., T = Te = TR under LTE.

For the ejecta density structure, we assume a single power law (ρr−3) for the velocity range of ejecta v = 0.05–0.3c (e.g., Metzger et al. 2010). The total ejecta mass is set to be Mej = 0.03 M, which is suggested to explain the observed luminosity of AT2017gfo (e.g., Tanaka et al. 2017; Kawaguchi et al. 2018). For the abundance distribution, we use the same model (L model) as described in Section 2.1. The heating rate of radioactive nuclei as a function of time is consistently computed for this model. The thermalization efficiency of γ-rays and radioactive particles follows the analytic formula given by Barnes et al. (2016). The resulting temperature structure of the ejecta is shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Figure 6. The temperature structure of the ejecta at t = 1.5, 2.5, and 3.5 days after the merger.

Standard image High-resolution image

3.2. Results

Figure 7 shows the synthetic spectrum at t = 1.5 days after the merger. To show the contribution of different elements, we also plot the Sobolev optical depths in the ejecta at v = 0.16 c. The wavelengths of lines are blueshifted according to v = 0.16 c. Note that we plot only spectroscopically accurate lines that contribute to absorption features.

Figure 7.

Figure 7. Synthetic spectrum (blue curve) and Sobolev optical depth of each transition (vertical lines) at t = 1.5 days. We plot the Sobolev optical depths of spectroscopically accurate lines in the ejecta at v = 0.16 c. The positions of lines are blueshifted according to v = 0.16 c. The temperature in the ejecta at v = 0.16 c is T ∼ 6000 K.

Standard image High-resolution image

The spectrum shows two strong absorption features at λ ∼ 8000 Å (red arrow) and λ ∼ 6500 Å (blue arrow). These are mainly caused by Sr ii and Ca ii as found in Domoto et al. (2021), although some Y ii (dark-blue) and Zr ii (green) lines also slightly affect the feature. In addition, the spectrum shows wide absorption features around λ ∼ 12,000 and 14,000 Å (pink and orange arrows). These are produced by La iii and Ce iii lines, respectively. The presence of these absorption features is reasonable, because Ca ii, Sr ii, La iii, and Ce iii are found to be strong absorption sources in the one-zone analysis (Section 2). The central wavelengths of absorption lines for La iii and Ce iii show that the photospheric velocity at the NIR region is v ∼ 0.16c, while that for Ca ii and Sr ii is v ∼ 0.2c. This indicates that the line-forming regions for different wavelength ranges do not coincide owing to the wavelength-dependent opacity.

Figure 8 shows a comparison between our results and the observed spectra of AT2017gfo at t = 1.5, 2.5, and 3.5 days after the merger (Pian et al. 2017; Smartt et al. 2017; see Gillanders et al. 2022 for the latest calibration). We here focus only on the spectral features in the NIR region, because the absorption features by Ca and Sr in the observed spectra of AT2017gfo and their implication for the ejecta condition have already been discussed in Domoto et al. (2021). We find that the overall slopes of synthetic spectra in the NIR region are quite similar to the observed ones. The Doppler shift of absorption lines becomes smaller with time, because the density of the ejecta becomes lower and the photosphere moves inward (in mass coordinate). Interestingly, the positions of absorption features at the NIR wavelengths in our results are consistent with those seen in AT2017gfo, especially at t ≥ 2.5 days. Although this model motivated by the observed luminosity of AT2017gfo is quite simple, the NIR features appear to agree with the observed ones without an adjustment of, e.g., density distribution. This implies that the absorption features at the NIR wavelengths in the spectra of AT2017gfo may be caused by the La iii and Ce iii lines.

Figure 8.

Figure 8. Comparison between the synthetic spectra (blue) and the observed spectra of AT2017gfo (gray, Pian et al. 2017; Smartt et al. 2017) at t = 1.5, 2.5, and 3.5 days after the merger (dark to light colors). Spectra are vertically shifted for visualization. The gray shade shows the regions of strong atmospheric absorption.

Standard image High-resolution image

It should be noted that the assumption of LTE may not be valid in a low-density region. In the results here, neutral atoms, especially for Y and Zr, which appear in the outer ejecta, are the dominant opacity sources at t ≥ 2.5 days at the optical wavelengths (Tanaka et al. 2020; Kawaguchi et al. 2021; Gillanders et al. 2022). On the other hand, recent work on the nebula phase of kilonovae suggests that ionization fractions as well as the temperature structure of ejecta can be deviated from those expected in LTE with time, i.e., as the ejecta density decreases (Hotokezaka et al. 2021; Pognan et al. 2022b). These non-LTE effects may change the emergent spectra a few days after the merger, mainly at the optical wavelengths, where many strong lines of neutral atoms exist (Kawaguchi et al. 2021). Nevertheless, since the photosphere for the NIR region is located at the inner ejecta where the density is enough high, non-LTE effects are expected to be subdominant (Pognan et al. 2022a).

4. Discussion

4.1. Lanthanide Abundances

Our results show that kilonova photospheric spectra exhibit absorption features of La iii and Ce iii in the NIR region, which are in fact similar to those seen in the spectra of AT2017gfo. In this subsection, we examine a possible range of these lanthanide mass fractions in the ejecta of AT2017gfo by using the NIR features.

To investigate the effect of the La amount on the spectra, we perform the same simulations as in Section 3 but by varying the mass fraction of La. The resultant spectra at t = 2.5 days after the merger are shown in the left panel of Figure 9. We find that the strength of absorption due to the La iii lines at λ ∼ 12500 Å changes with the mass fraction of La. On the other hand, no matter how the mass fraction changes, the overall spectral shapes hardly change. Because La lines have little effect on the total opacity, the NIR opacity is almost unchanged. Thus, the strong lines of La iii keep producing strong absorption as long as enough La is present. According to the tests shown in the left panel of Figure 9, we estimate that the mass fraction of La is higher than 1/30 times that of the L model, i.e., X(La) > 2 × 10−6, which is required to identify the visible absorption feature at λ ∼ 12500 Å in the spectra of AT2017gfo.

Figure 9.

Figure 9. Synthetic spectra at t = 2.5 days after the merger for different mass fractions of La (left) and Ce (right). Variation of each element is shown in the legend with the same color used for the spectra. Pink and orange arrows in each panel indicate the position of the notable absorption lines caused by La iii and Ce iii, respectively. Line segments above and below the spectra indicate spectral slopes for visualization.

Standard image High-resolution image

By contrast, the situation is different in the case of Ce. To investigate the effect of the Ce amount on the spectra, we perform the same calculations for Ce as done for La above. The resultant spectra at t = 2.5 days after the merger are shown in the right panel of Figure 9. We find that the absorption feature at λ ∼ 14000 Å diminishes as the mass fraction of Ce is substantially reduced (blueish curves). Also, the absorption feature disappears as well, even when the mass fraction of Ce is substantially increased (pink curve). Because Ce lines appreciably contribute to the total opacity, the higher Ce mass fraction results in a higher total opacity. As a result, the photosphere shifts outward compared to that in the L model. This makes the photospheric temperature lower, and thus, the Ce iii lines disappear.

The amount of Ce affects not only absorption features but also overall spectral shapes. The spectra become redder and bluer when X(Ce) is increased and reduced, respectively. This is because Ce has high opacity in the NIR region and is the most dominant opacity source at the NIR wavelengths in this model. As the contribution of other heavy elements to the total opacity is subdominant, even if the mass fractions of all the elements with a mass number larger than 100 are varied by a factor of 10, the results are almost the same as those in the right panel of Figure 9. Note that the element species that dominate the opacity depend on the ejecta conditions (such as density, temperature, and epoch), but generally lanthanide elements with a small atomic number (e.g., Ce and Nd) tend to have a larger contribution as they have more transitions from low-lying energy levels (Even et al. 2020; Tanaka et al. 2020).

We roughly estimate the mass fraction of Ce presented in the ejecta of AT2017gfo from our calculations. It is difficult to determine the exact amount of lanthanides from absorption features, because Ce has complex effects on spectral formation, as discussed above. Nevertheless, our demonstration suggests that a certain amount of Ce must have been present in order to explain the absorption features as well as the NIR fluxes. However, a too large amount of Ce diminishes the absorption features. As a result, the mass fraction of Ce is estimated to be between 1/3 and 30 times that of the L model to account for the absorption feature, i.e., X(Ce) ∼ (1–100) × 10−5. This corresponds to the lanthanide mass fraction of ∼(2–200) ×10−4 if assuming the solar abundance pattern of r-process elements. While the lanthanide mass fraction estimated here is consistent with or somewhat higher than the values previously suggested (e.g., McCully et al. 2017; Nicholl et al. 2017; Gillanders et al. 2022), we emphasize that this is the first constraint on the lanthanide abundances using the absorption features in the spectra of AT2017gfo.

It should be noted that the results presented here are calculated with a single structure of ejecta (Section 3). The effects of ejecta properties, e.g., mass and velocity, on the spectra should be systematically examined. Furthermore, the spectra are calculated by assuming a simple one-dimensional morphology of ejecta with homogeneous abundance distribution. It is important to employ more realistic models to elucidate the effects of multidimensional ejecta structures. We leave such exploration to future work.

4.2. Features of Actinide Elements

We have shown that the ions that tend to produce absorption features in kilonova photospheric spectra can be explained by atomic properties (Section 2.2). According to the required properties, one can notice that not only lanthanides but also actinide elements can possibly contribute to the spectral features. However, while we include actinide elements in our abundance input up to Z = 100, actinide elements are not included in the line list due to the difficulty of atomic structure calculations for actinides (Tanaka et al. 2020). On the other hand, some experimental data are available for Th (Z = 90). In the following, we discuss the effects of Th absorption features based on experimental data.

Th iii is one of the possible candidates for the ions that can contribute to the spectral features. The atomic structure of Th iii is analogous to that of Ce iii, which has two electrons in the outermost shell involving with f-shell. Fortunately, the energy levels of Th iii are well established by experiments. For optical lines, not only transition wavelengths but also transition probabilities are available in the VALD database (Biémont et al. 2002). Moreover, the transition wavelengths in the NIR region are measured by experiments (Engleman 2003). However, there is no available data on transition probability for the NIR lines.

To test the possibility of identifying Th iii lines in kilonova photospheric spectra, we estimate the transition probabilities of the NIR Th iii lines by using the measured intensities. Since the relative intensities of the measured NIR lines (Engleman 2003) are listed in the NIST database (Kramida et al. 2021) in a consistent way with those of optical lines, we can directly compare the measured and calculated intensities for the lines over the whole wavelength range. Here, although the same estimate of gf-values can be, in principle, applicable to other ionization stages of Th, e.g., Th ii, only those of Th iii are tested. This is because lines of lower-ionized ions for Th are not expected to show strong transitions compared to those of Th iii, such that Ce iii show strong lines but Ce ii does not (Section 2.2).

First, we calculate the line intensities for the optical lines for Th iii with known gf-values taken from the VALD database using Equation (3). A comparison between the intensities calculated with the VALD gf-values and those measured by experiments for Th iii (Kramida et al. 2021) is shown in Figure 10. We find that the calculated and experimentally measured intensities reasonably agree with each other when we adopt the temperature of T = 5000 K. Therefore, we estimate the transition probabilities of NIR lines for Th iii by using the measured intensities (Engleman 2003; Kramida et al. 2021) and this temperature. Estimated gf-values are summarized in Table 5 (Appendix B).

Figure 10.

Figure 10. Comparison of intensities (green circles) for Th iii lines between those calculated with gf-values from the VALD database and those measured by experiments (Kramida et al. 2021; Engleman 2003). Gray dashed and dotted lines correspond to perfect agreement and deviations by a factor of 3 and 10, respectively. Red circles indicate the lines whose gf-values are estimated from the measured intensities.

Standard image High-resolution image

Then, we calculate the strength of bound–bound transitions for Th iii lines at t = 1.5 days for the L model, as in Section 2. The top panel of Figure 11 is the same as the bottom left panel of Figure 2 but with the Th iii lines. We find that the strength of the Th iii lines at the NIR wavelengths can be comparable to that of Ce iii lines. This is due to the same reason as discussed in Section 2.2: relatively high transition probabilities and low energy levels of transitions.

Figure 11.

Figure 11. Top: Sobolev optical depth of bound–bound transitions calculated with the hybrid line list (Section 2.3) including Th iii lines (light blue) taken from the VALD database (λ < 10000 Å) and the NIST database (λ ≥ 10000 Å) at t = 1.5 days under the condition of ρ = 10−14 g cm−3 and T = 5000 K.Bottom: comparison between the synthetic spectra including Th iii lines (blue) and the observed spectra of AT2017gfo (gray, Pian et al. 2017; Smartt et al. 2017) at t = 1.5, 2.5, and 3.5 days after the merger (dark to light colors). The light-blue curves are the same as the blue curves in Figure 8.

Standard image High-resolution image

We perform the same radiative transfer simulations as in Section 3 by including the Th iii lines. The synthetic spectra with the Th iii lines are shown in the bottom panel of Figure 11 (blue curves). We find that the fluxes for λ ≥ 20000 Å are slightly pushed up compared to those of the results without the Th iii lines (light-blue curves, see Figure 8). However, the spectral features are not substantially different from those not including the Th iii lines, although a wide and marginal absorption feature can be seen around λ ∼ 18000 Å at t = 1.5 days. This implies that it is difficult to confirm the presence of Th from spectral features.

The difference between the absorption features for Th iii and Ce iii can be explained by the complex atomic structure of actinides. As shown in the top panel of Figure 11, although the Th iii lines in the NIR region are relatively strong, many transitions exhibit similar Sobolev optical depths and no significant line like that of Ce iii at λ ∼ 16000 Å exists. This is due to the fact that Th iii has denser low-lying energy levels involved in 5f-shell compared to those of Ce iii involved in 4f-shell. Silva et al. (2022) recently showed that the opacity of another actinide U iii (Z = 92) is about an order of magnitude larger than that of Nd iii for the same reason. Note that an actinide, Ac (Z = 89, as 227Ac with the half-life of 21.77 yr), can also exist with a similar amount to those of Th and U in the ejecta of kilonovae. Ac iii may have a similar atomic structure to that of La iii. However, Ac iii is poorly understood both in theory and experiments, and it is not clear if Ac iii can produce prominent features like La iii. Thus, although actinide ions can be important opacity sources in the NIR region, it may not be easy to identify the presence of actinides from the spectral features.

5. Conclusions

We have performed systematic calculations of the strength of bound–bound transitions and radiative transfer simulations with the aim of identifying elements in kilonova spectra. We constructed a hybrid line list by combining an experimentally calibrated accurate line list with a theoretically constructed complete line list. This allows us to investigate the entire wavelength range of kilonova photospheric spectra. We have found that La iii and Ce iii produce absorption features at the NIR wavelengths (λ ∼ 12000–14000 Å). The positions of these features are consistent with those seen in the spectra of GW170817/AT2017gfo. Using the absorption lines caused by La iii and Ce iii, we have estimated that the mass fractions of La and Ce synthesized in the ejecta of GW170817/AT2017gfo are X(La) > 2 × 10−6 and X(Ce) ∼ (1–100) × 10−5, respectively. This is the first spectroscopic estimation of the lanthanide abundances in NS merger ejecta.

We have shown that the elements on the left side of the periodic table (Ca, Sr, Y, Zr, Ba, La, and Ce) tend to produce prominent absorption features in kilonova photospheric spectra. This is due to the fact that such ions have a relatively small number of valence electrons in the outermost shell (leading to low complexities, and high transition probabilities for bound–bound transitions) and have relatively low-lying energy levels (leading to a large population in the Boltzmann distribution).

Since the atomic structure of Th iii is analogous to that of Ce iii, we have investigated the possibility of identifying Th iii lines in kilonova spectra. We have found that it is more difficult to identify the definitive features caused by Th iii, because it has denser low-lying energy levels and no outstanding identifiable lines. Although the atomic data of Th iii (Table 5) are still uncertain, our demonstration suggests that we need to consider another way to obtain evidence of synthesized actinide elements from observables.

In this paper, we have used a model dominated by relatively light r-process elements. For more lanthanide-rich ejecta, the emergent spectra should be redder and fainter than predicted by our results, due to the high opacity of heavy elements. Also, the spectra should become smoother due to the presence of many weak lines from heavy elements. Since our hybrid line list is constructed assuming an abundance model dominated by light r-process elements, we are unable to discuss spectral features in the lanthanide-rich ejecta. To extract more information from various spectra, further effort is necessary to construct spectroscopically accurate atomic data for heavy elements. It is also cautioned that the abundance with Z ≤ 19 has been excluded in our calculations, because their mass fractions are very small (<10−4) except for He (the left panel of Figure 1). Although He might produce absorption features in spectra, it requires the consideration of non-LTE effects on the level population (Perego et al. 2022). While the exclusion of light elements does not affect our conclusions under the assumption of LTE, the systematic exploration of He line formation will be of interest in the future.

Part of the numerical simulations presented in this paper was carried out on Cray XC50 at the Center for Computational Astrophysics, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan. N.D. acknowledges support from Graduate Program on Physics for the Universe (GP-PU) at Tohoku University. This research was supported by NIFS Collaborative Research Program (NIFS22KIIF005), the Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows (22J22810), the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from JSPS (19H00694, 20H00158, 21H04997, 21K13912), and MEXT (17H06363).

Appendix A: Calibration of Atomic Data

We calibrate the theoretical atomic data with experimental data to enable us to discuss absorption lines in kilonova spectra. Here, we describe our method of this calibration procedure. We perform the calibration for Sr ii, Y i, Y ii, Zr i, Zr ii, Ba ii, La iii, and Ce iii, which are found as strong absorption sources in Section 2.1. For the experimental data, we use the NIST Atomic Spectra Database (Kramida et al. 2021) to calibrate the energy levels. The energy levels of these ions have been well determined from experiments mainly in the optical wavelengths.

The NIST database lists term symbols of energy levels. By using those symbols, it is possible to associate the theoretical energy levels with those in the NIST database. It should be, however, noted that energy terms can be expressed in different ways depending on angular momentum coupling schemes: LS-coupling and jj-coupling. While the NIST database adopts the LS scheme, the HULLAC code used for atomic calculations adopts the jj scheme (Bar-Shalom et al. 2001). Since it is not possible to directly compare energy levels in different schemes, we perform the transformation from the jj-coupled to the LS-coupled energy terms for the theoretical energy levels (Cowan 1968, 1981).

While energy terms are uniquely determined for one-electron systems (Sr ii, Ba ii, and La iii), transformations are required for atoms with more than two valence electrons. To perform all the transformations systematically, we use the LSJ code (Gaigalas et al. 2004). The LSJ code transforms a jj-coupled basis to an LS-coupled representation according to inputs of configuration state functions (CSF) and mixing coefficients. For the input of the LSJ code, we prepare the CSF lists for each ion by means of GRASP2018 (Froese Fischer et al. 2019) and mixing coefficients for energy levels from the HULLAC results (Tanaka et al. 2020). Using these inputs, we perform the jj-LS transformations for the energy levels of Y i, Y ii, Zr i, Zr ii, and Ce iii.

As an energy term for each energy level, we assign the leading term with the largest mixing coefficient from the results of the LSJ code. When leading terms are the same for two levels, we assign the term to a level with a larger mixing coefficient than the other one. For the other level, the unassigned term with the next largest coefficient is assigned.

For the spectral features or opacity of kilonovae, calibration of low-lying energy levels is the most important (Section 2.2). Nevertheless, we also perform the transformation for many excited levels so that we have enough transitions to confirm the accuracy of gf-values (see below, the right panels of Figures 1219). Since ions with a smaller number of valence electrons tend to have a smaller number of levels, we perform the calibration for a larger number of configurations for simpler ions. As a result, our calibrated line list naturally includes strong and important transitions. The energy diagrams of calibrated configurations for each ion are shown in the left panels of Figures 1219.

For Zr i, the calibration is performed in a slightly different way from other ions. When angular momenta of more than three electrons are coupled, intermediate terms are needed to distinguish the energy terms. However, for the energy terms of most levels in 4d25s5p for Zr i, the NIST database shows the intermediate terms in a different way from the LSJ code. Therefore, we associate the energy terms for 4d25s5p of the HULLAC results and the NIST database in the order of energy among levels with the same total angular momentum J.

After calibration of the energy levels, we calibrate the wavelengths of the transitions between the calibrated energy levels. Since we aim to discuss the spectral features of kilonovae, the lines whose original and calibrated wavelengths are in the forest of lines at λ < 5000 Å are left as the original theoretical ones for simplicity. Then, if available, transition probabilities of the calibrated lines are taken from the VALD database (Piskunov et al. 1995; Kupka et al. 1999; Ryabchikova et al. 2015). For Zr i and Zr ii, we instead use Kurucz's atomic data 11 (Kurucz 2018), which are constructed by semiempirical calculations and newer than those in the VALD database. We use these databases instead of the NIST database, because the NIST database does not necessarily include all the transition data for heavy elements. If the transition probabilities of the calibrated lines are not listed in both databases, we adopt those from the theoretical calculations, which only happens to La iii and Ce iii mainly in NIR wavelengths. We summarize the calibrated lines that adopt the theoretical gf-values with λ > 7000 Å and log gf > −3 in Tables 34.

Note that, theoretically calculated transition probabilities are not necessarily accurate. The right panels of Figures 1219 show a comparison of gf-values between the HULLAC results and the VALD (or Kurucz's) database for all the lines between the calibrated energy levels. We see that, while the values roughly agree for simple ions, there is a scatter as the number of outermost electrons increases, especially for low gf-values. This is unavoidable, as the theoretical calculations become inaccurate as atomic structures become complex. Nevertheless, it is emphasized that the uncertainty of theoretical gf-values does not affect our conclusions about NIR spectral features, because gf-values of La iii and Ce iii agree quite well for strong transitions as shown in the right panel of Figures 18 and 19 (see also Figure 5 for the NIR Ce iii lines). To determine the exact values of transition probabilities of the lines, more experimental and observational calibrations are necessary.

Appendix B: Estimated Transition Probabilities of Th iii Lines

We summarize the gf-values of Th iii lines estimated by using the measured line intensities in Table 5 (see Section 4.2).

Figure 12.

Figure 12. Left: energy diagram for Sr ii. Black and red lines show energy levels from the NIST database and the HULLAC results, respectively. Right: comparison of gf-values between the VALD database and the HULLAC results. Gray dashed line corresponds to perfect agreement between them, and dashed–dotted and dotted lines indicate deviations by a factor of 3 and 10, respectively.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 13.

Figure 13. Same as Figure 12, but for Y i.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 14.

Figure 14. Same as Figure 12, but for Y ii.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 15.

Figure 15. Same as Figure 12, but for Zr i. Kurucz's atomic data are used instead of the VALD database for comparison in the right panel. The energy levels of 4d25s5p above 4 eV for the HULLAC results are not shown and not used for the calibration because of strong mixing with high-lying levels of other configurations.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 16.

Figure 16. Same as Figure 12, but for Zr ii. Kurucz's atomic data are used instead of the VALD database for comparison in the right panel.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 17.

Figure 17. Same as Figure 12, but for Ba ii.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 18.

Figure 18. Same as Figure 12, but for La iii.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 19.

Figure 19. Same as Figure 12, but for Ce iii.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 3. Summary of Calibrated Lines for La iii

  λvac a λair b Lower Level Elower c Upper Level Eupper d log gfe
 (Å)(Å) (cm−1) (cm−1) 
La iii 13898.27013894.4715d2D3/2 0.004f ${}^{2}{{\rm{F}}}_{5/2}^{o}$ 7195.14−0.749
 14100.03714096.1835d2D5/2 1603.234f ${}^{2}{{\rm{F}}}_{7/2}^{o}$ 8695.41−0.587
 17882.97717878.0945d2D5/2 1603.234f ${}^{2}{{\rm{F}}}_{5/2}^{o}$ 7195.14−1.938

Notes. We list only lines that adopt theoretical gf-values with λ > 7000 Å and log gf > −3.

a Vacuum transition wavelength. b Air transition wavelength. c Lower energy level. d Upper energy level. e gf-value (Tanaka et al. 2020).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Table 4. Same as Table 3, but for Ce iii

  λvac a λair b Lower Level Elower c Upper Level Eupper d log gfe
 (Å)(Å) (cm−1) (cm−1) 
Ce iii 8100.8008098.5734f2 1G4 7120.0004f6s ${\left(\tfrac{5}{2}\tfrac{1}{2}\right)}_{3}$ 19464.460−2.682
 11071.35311068.3214f2 1G4 7120.0004f5d ${}^{1}{{\rm{H}}}_{5}^{o}$ 16152.320−2.636
 11093.38611090.3494f2 1D2 12835.0904f6s ${\left(\tfrac{7}{2}\tfrac{1}{2}\right)}_{3}$ 21849.470−2.870
 11094.39611091.3584f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{F}}}_{2}^{o}$ 3821.5304f2 1D2 12835.090−2.669
 12760.44112756.9514f2 3H4 0.0004f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{G}}}_{4}^{o}$ 7836.720−1.947
 12825.13312821.6264f2 3H5 1528.3204f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{G}}}_{5}^{o}$ 9325.510−1.910
 12926.64412923.1094f2 3F3 4764.7604f5d ${}^{1}{{\rm{F}}}_{3}^{o}$ 12500.720−2.598
 13155.10813151.5114f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{D}}}_{1}^{o}$ 8922.0504f2 3P1 16523.660−2.454
 13342.83313339.1854f2 3F4 5006.0604f5d ${}^{1}{{\rm{F}}}_{3}^{o}$ 12500.720−0.922
 13482.54013478.8544f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{D}}}_{2}^{o}$ 9900.4904f2 3P2 17317.490−2.368
 13906.34913902.5484f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{D}}}_{3}^{o}$ 10126.5304f2 3P2 17317.490−2.014
 13986.03413982.2114f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{D}}}_{1}^{o}$ 8922.0504f2 3P0 16072.040−2.298
 14659.16714655.1614f2 3H5 1528.3204f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{H}}}_{6}^{o}$ 8349.990−2.911
 15098.51015094.3854f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{D}}}_{2}^{o}$ 9900.4904f2 3P1 16523.660−2.013
 15720.13115715.8374f2 3H4 0.0004f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{H}}}_{5}^{o}$ 6361.270−2.985
 15851.88015847.5504f2 3H5 1528.3204f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{G}}}_{4}^{o}$ 7836.720−0.613
 15961.15715956.7974f2 3H4 0.0004f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{G}}}_{3}^{o}$ 6265.210−0.721
 15964.92815960.5674f5d ${}^{1}{{\rm{D}}}_{2}^{o}$ 6571.3604f2 1D2 12835.090−1.272
 16133.17016128.7634f2 3H6 3127.1004f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{G}}}_{5}^{o}$ 9325.510−0.509
 16292.64216288.1924f2 3F2 3762.7504f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{D}}}_{2}^{o}$ 9900.490−2.050
 17529.03717524.2514f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{P}}}_{1}^{o}$ 11612.6704f2 3P2 17317.490−1.873
 17829.95217825.0844f2 1D4 12835.0904f5d ${}^{1}{{\rm{P}}}_{1}^{o}$ 18443.630−1.546
 18584.87318579.8004f2 1G4 7120.0004f5d ${}^{1}{{\rm{F}}}_{3}^{o}$ 12500.720−1.850
 18650.55818645.4664f2 3F3 4764.7604f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{D}}}_{3}^{o}$ 10126.530−2.173
 19146.48819141.2614f2 3H6 3127.1004f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{H}}}_{6}^{o}$ 8349.990−1.496
 19382.47419377.1844f2 3F2 3762.7504f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{D}}}_{1}^{o}$ 8922.050−1.373
 19471.42919466.1144f2 3F3 4764.7604f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{D}}}_{2}^{o}$ 9900.490−1.210
 19503.55619498.2334f2 3H4 0.0004f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{H}}}_{4}^{o}$ 5127.270−1.987
 19529.45719524.1274f2 3F4 5006.0604f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{D}}}_{3}^{o}$ 10126.530−2.825
 20216.31520210.7974f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{P}}}_{0}^{o}$ 11577.1604f2 3P1 16523.660−1.937
 20362.49320356.9364f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{P}}}_{1}^{o}$ 11612.6704f2 3P1 16523.660−2.072
 20691.29620685.6494f2 3H5 1528.3204f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{H}}}_{5}^{o}$ 6361.270−1.665
 20760.80020755.1354f5d ${}^{1}{{\rm{F}}}_{3}^{o}$ 12500.7204f2 3P2 17317.490−2.167
 21386.07421380.2384f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{P}}}_{2}^{o}$ 12641.5504f2 3P2 17317.490−1.426
 22424.69222418.5744f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{P}}}_{1}^{o}$ 11612.6704f2 3P0 16072.040−2.010
 23151.09623144.7794f2 3F4 5006.0604f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{G}}}_{5}^{o}$ 9325.510−2.639
 25759.18825752.1614f5d ${}^{3}{{\rm{P}}}_{2}^{o}$ 12641.5504f2 3P1 16523.660−1.972
 26019.03626011.9384f5d ${}^{1}{{\rm{G}}}_{4}^{o}$ 3276.6604f2 1G4 7120.000−1.749

Notes. We list only lines that adopt theoretical gf-values with λ > 7000 Å and log gf > −3.

a Vacuum transition wavelength. b Air transition wavelength. c Lower energy level. d Upper energy level. e gf-value (Tanaka et al. 2020).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Table 5. Summary of Lines for Th iii

  λvac a λair b Lower Level Elower c Upper Level Eupper d log gfe
 (Å)(Å) (cm−1) (cm−1) 
Th iii 10046.635410043.88235f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{H}}}_{4}^{o}$ 0.0006d7s3D3 9953.581−1.984
 10257.020310254.21055f6d 6288.2216d7s1D2 16037.641−1.106
 10260.977810258.16625f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{G}}}_{4}^{o}$ 8141.7495f2 3H5 17887.4090.979
 10532.869510529.98445f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{G}}}_{5}^{o}$ 11276.8075f2 3H6 20770.8961.310
 10581.357110578.45855f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{H}}}_{6}^{o}$ 8436.8265f2 3H5 17887.409−0.994
 10710.531610703.64485f6d ${}^{1}{{\rm{H}}}_{5}^{o}$ 19009.9105f2 1I6 28349.9621.744
 11216.302311213.23196d2 3F4 6537.8175f6d ${}^{1}{{\rm{F}}}_{3}^{o}$ 15453.412−0.796
 11227.311611224.23815f6d 8980.5575f2 3H5 17887.4090.513
 11428.810311425.68247s2 1S0 11961.1325f6d ${}^{1}{{\rm{P}}}_{1}^{o}$ 20710.949−0.485
 11516.620011513.46785f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{D}}}_{2}^{o}$ 10180.7665f2 3F2 18863.869−0.799
 11720.881411717.67436d2 4676.4325f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{P}}}_{2}^{o}$ 13208.214−1.637
 11810.543611807.31186d2 1G4 10542.8995f6d ${}^{1}{{\rm{H}}}_{5}^{o}$ 19009.9100.657
 12081.227112077.92186d7s3D2 7176.1075f6d ${}^{1}{{\rm{F}}}_{3}^{o}$ 15453.412−1.159
 12320.500412317.12995f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{D}}}_{1}^{o}$ 7921.0886d7s1D2 16037.641−0.295
 12726.174312722.69386d2 3F2 63.2675f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{D}}}_{1}^{o}$ 7921.088−1.209
 12918.744912915.21295f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{P}}}_{1}^{o}$ 11123.1795f2 3F2 18863.869−0.724
 13075.460613071.88565f7s 7500.6055f2 3H4 15148.519−0.466
 13102.253613098.67095f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{P}}}_{2}^{o}$ 13208.2145f2 3F3 20840.489−0.661
 13445.670213441.99436d2 3F2 63.2675f7s 7500.605−2.137
 13465.319513461.63785f7s 2527.0956d7s3D3 9953.581−1.090
 13577.610513573.89975f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{F}}}_{2}^{o}$ 510.7586d2 3P1 7875.824−2.619
 13596.936913593.21865f6d 3188.3016d2 1G4 10542.899−1.960
 14271.911114268.01085f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{G}}}_{4}^{o}$ 8141.7495f2 3H4 15148.519−0.949
 14363.144814359.22005f6d ${}^{1}{{\rm{H}}}_{5}^{o}$ 19009.9105f2 1G4 25972.1730.478
 14766.515014762.48025f7s ${}^{3}{{\rm{F}}}_{2}^{o}$ 3181.5026d7s3D3 9953.581−2.286
 14781.354414777.31545f6d 3188.3016 d7s3D3 9953.581−1.198
 14958.562014954.47506d2 3F3 4056.0155f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{D}}}_{3}^{o}$ 10741.150−1.640
 15002.966714998.86745f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{F}}}_{2}^{o}$ 510.7586d7s3D2 7176.107−1.319
 15127.214915123.08145f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{G}}}_{5}^{o}$ 11276.8075f2 3H5 17887.409−0.684
 15295.624815291.44615f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{H}}}_{4}^{o}$ 0.0006d2 3F4 6537.817−1.523
 15511.699315507.46186d2 4676.4325f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{P}}}_{0}^{o}$ 11123.179−1.418
 16064.374716059.98606d2 3F2 63.2675f6d 6288.221−2.781
 16212.810916208.38345f6d 8980.5575f2 3H4 15148.519−1.665
 16327.195916322.73696d2 3F3 4056.0155f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{D}}}_{2}^{o}$ 10180.766−1.239
 16488.813116484.31006d2 4676.4325f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{D}}}_{3}^{o}$ 10741.150−0.384
 16577.955016573.42716d7s3D2 7176.1075f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{P}}}_{2}^{o}$ 13208.214−1.372
 17073.950517069.28885f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{D}}}_{2}^{o}$ 10180.7666d7s1D2 16037.641−1.313
 17494.529617489.75245f6d 4826.8266d2 1G4 10542.899−0.741
 17517.019017512.23536d7s3D1 5523.8815f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{P}}}_{0}^{o}$ 11232.615−1.441
 17814.480417809.61605f6d 4826.8266d2 3P2 10440.237−2.318
 17859.381017854.50716d7s3D1 5523.8815f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{P}}}_{1}^{o}$ 11123.179−1.467
 18182.378418177.41506d7s3D3 9953.5815f6d ${}^{1}{{\rm{F}}}_{3}^{o}$ 15453.412−2.372
 18240.336918235.36135f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{G}}}_{3}^{o}$ 5060.5446d2 1G4 10542.899−1.492
 18588.420118583.34605f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{G}}}_{3}^{o}$ 5060.5446d2 3P2 10440.237−2.281
 18880.424018875.27005f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{D}}}_{3}^{o}$ 10741.1506d7s1D2 16037.641−1.312
 19947.441219941.99696d2 3P2 10440.2375f6d ${}^{1}{{\rm{F}}}_{3}^{o}$ 15453.412−0.178
 19947.646719942.20255f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{F}}}_{2}^{o}$ 510.7586d7s3D1 5523.881−1.086
 20010.897720005.43626d2 3F2 63.2675f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{G}}}_{3}^{o}$ 5060.544−1.190
 20306.456920300.91486d2 3F3 4056.0155f6d 8980.557−0.442
 20364.472020358.91576d2 1G4 10542.8995f6d ${}^{1}{{\rm{F}}}_{3}^{o}$ 15453.412−0.274
 20437.204420431.62735f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{G}}}_{3}^{o}$ 5060.5446d7s3D3 9953.581−1.782
 20992.705520986.97626d2 3F2 63.2675f6d 4826.826−0.743
 21101.543721095.78516d2 3F4 6537.8175f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{G}}}_{5}^{o}$ 11276.8070.314
 21398.121521392.28176d7s1D2 16037.6415f6d ${}^{1}{{\rm{P}}}_{1}^{o}$ 20710.949−0.251
 21473.581521467.72826d7s3D1 5523.8815f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{D}}}_{2}^{o}$ 10180.766−2.887
 21509.950721504.08205f7s 2527.0956d7s3D2 7176.107−0.982
 22689.271622683.08125f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{D}}}_{3}^{o}$ 10741.1505f2 3H4 15148.519−1.177
 23628.981523622.53445f7s ${}^{3}{{\rm{F}}}_{4}^{o}$ 6310.8086d2 1G4 10542.899−1.267
 23790.645523784.15426d2 3F4 6537.8175f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{D}}}_{3}^{o}$ 10741.150−0.732
 24005.719623999.16885f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{F}}}_{2}^{o}$ 510.7586d2 4676.432−1.437
 24475.407524468.72996d2 3F3 4056.0155f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{G}}}_{4}^{o}$ 8141.7490.013
 25335.232725328.32286d7s3D2 7176.1075f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{P}}}_{1}^{o}$ 11123.179−1.584
 25897.409125890.34475f2 3H4 15148.5195f6d ${}^{1}{{\rm{H}}}_{5}^{o}$ 19009.910−0.921
 27282.451427275.01455f6d 6288.2216d7s3D3 9953.581−2.707
 27451.612627444.12645f7s ${}^{3}{{\rm{F}}}_{4}^{o}$ 6310.8086d7s3D3 9953.581−0.556
 28050.149228042.49846d7s3D2 7176.1075f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{D}}}_{3}^{o}$ 10741.150−1.066
 28206.697828199.00385f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{F}}}_{2}^{o}$ 510.7586d2 3F3 4056.015−1.924
 29790.361729782.24846d2 3P1 7875.8245f6d ${}^{3}{{\rm{P}}}_{0}^{o}$ 11232.615−2.471
 29855.058029846.91685f6d 3188.3016d2 3F4 6537.817−1.015

Notes. gf-values are estimated from the measured line intensities.

a Vacuum transition wavelength. b Air transition wavelength. c Lower energy level. d Upper energy level. e gf-value estimated in Section 4.2.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

Footnotes

Please wait… references are loading.
10.3847/1538-4357/ac8c36