Discovery of 21 New Changing-look AGNs in the Northern Sky

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , and

Published 2018 July 27 © 2018. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Qian Yang et al 2018 ApJ 862 109 DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/aaca3a

Download Article PDF
DownloadArticle ePub

You need an eReader or compatible software to experience the benefits of the ePub3 file format.

0004-637X/862/2/109

Abstract

The rare case of changing-look (CL) active galactic nuclei (AGNs), with the appearance or disappearance of broad Balmer emission lines within a few years, challenges our understanding of the AGN unified model. We present a sample of 21 new CL AGNs at $0.08\lt z\lt 0.58$, which doubles the number of such objects known to date. These new CL AGNs were discovered in various ways, from (1) repeat spectra in the SDSS, (2) repeat spectra in the Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope (LAMOST) and SDSS, and (3) photometric variability and new spectroscopic observations. We use the photometric data from surveys, including the SDSS imaging survey, the Pan-STARRS1, the DESI Legacy imaging survey, the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE), the Catalina Real-time Transient Survey, and the Palomar Transient Factory. The estimated upper limits of the transition timescale of the CL AGNs in this sample spans from 0.9 to 13 years in the rest-frame. The continuum flux in the optical and mid-infrared becomes brighter when the CL AGNs turn on, or vice versa. Variations of more than 0.2 mag in the W1 band were detected in 15 CL AGNs during the transition. The optical and mid-infrared variability is not consistent with the scenario of variable obscuration in 10 CL AGNs at more than the 3σ confidence level. We confirm a bluer-when-brighter trend in the optical. However, the mid-infrared WISE colors W1–W2 become redder when the objects become brighter in the W1 band, possibly due to a stronger hot dust contribution in the W2 band when the AGN activity becomes stronger. The physical mechanism of type transition is important for understanding the evolution of AGNs.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. Introduction

Active galactic nuclei (AGNs) are classified into Type 1 and Type 2 AGNs based on their emission-line features (e.g., Seyfert 1943; Khachikian & Weedman 1971). Type 1 AGNs show broad (1000–20,000 km s−1) and narrow (300–1000 km s−1) emission lines, while only narrow emission lines are present in Type 2 AGNs (Netzer 2015, and references therein). This dichotomy is explained in the unified model (Antonucci 1993; Urry & Padovani 1995) as a viewing angle effect due to the obscuration of the broad-line region (BLR). Intermediate AGN types exist. Type 1.8 (1.9) is classified by a broad Hα and a weak (absent) broad Hβ line (Osterbrock 1981). Type 1.5 is an intermediate type between Type 1 and Type 2 with an apparent narrow Hβ profile superimposed on broad Hβ components (Osterbrock & Koski 1976; Osterbrock 1977). The intermediate type objects are explained as Type 2 objects observed in scattered light (Antonucci & Miller 1985), or partial obscuration by optically thin dust (Stern & Laor 2012). An alternative scenario is that the different classes are evolutionary (Penston & Perez 1984; Korista & Goad 2004; Wang & Zhang 2007; Elitzur et al. 2014). Penston & Perez (1984) proposed that the Type 2 class AGNs are possibly Type 1 AGNs in which the continuum source is temporarily off.

Some AGNs were observed to change between different spectral types; these are the so-called changing-look (CL) AGNs. The term "changing-look" was originally used in X-rays, in which objects were found to change from Compton-thick to Compton-thin, or vice versa (e.g., Matt et al. 2003; Bianchi et al. 2005; Piconcelli et al. 2007; Ballo et al. 2008; Risaliti et al. 2009; Marchese et al. 2012; Ricci et al. 2016). Lately, this term has been widened to describe objects with optical spectral type transitions (e.g., Denney et al. 2014; LaMassa et al. 2015; MacLeod et al. 2016; McElroy et al. 2016; Ruan et al. 2016; Runnoe et al. 2016; Gezari et al. 2017). The physical mechanisms of the changes are still under debate. The main plausible mechanisms are (1) variable obscuration due to the movement of obscuring material, in a scenario in which the dusty toroidal structure obscuring the BLR has a patchy distribution (e.g., Nenkova et al. 2008a, 2008b; Elitzur 2012) or an accelerating outflow (e.g., Shapovalova et al. 2010); (2) variable accretion rate, in an evolutionary paradigm in which an AGN follows an evolutionary sequence from Type 1 to intermediate type and later to Type 2, or vice versa (e.g., Penston & Perez 1984; Elitzur et al. 2014); or (3) a tidal disruption event (TDE) of a star disrupted by the supermassive black hole (SMBH), which may also result in a change of classification (Eracleous et al. 1995; Merloni et al. 2015; Blanchard et al. 2017). The nature of the type transition is important for understanding the evolution of AGNs.

Spectral type changes, with the appearance or disappearance of broad Balmer emission lines, have been detected in only a small number of AGNs. Long-timescale observations of a handful of AGNs show that some AGNs have changed from Type 1 to Type 2, and back and forth. Mrk 1018 had changed from a Type 1.9 to a Type 1 Seyfert, and changed back to Type 1.9 after 30 years (Cohen et al. 1986; McElroy et al. 2016). Observations over more than 40 years reveal that Mrk 590 changed from Type 1.5 to Type 1 and changed back to Type 1.9-2 (Denney et al. 2014). NGC 2617, which was a Seyfert 1.8 galaxy (Moran et al. 1996), changed to a Seyfert 1 (Shappee et al. 2014). These cases are better explained as changes in luminosity rather than obscuration (Denney et al. 2014; Shappee et al. 2014; McElroy et al. 2016). The broad emission lines of NGC 4151, which was originally Type 1.5 (Osterbrock 1977), had once disappeared (Antonucci & Cohen 1983; Lyutyj et al. 1984; Penston & Perez 1984) and then returned (e.g., Shapovalova et al. 2010). The variation in NGC 4151 is explained as probably being caused by an accelerating outflow originating very close to the black hole (BH; Shapovalova et al. 2010). Such back-and-forth type changes encourage exploration of what mechanisms generate these changes.

In recent years, discoveries of CL quasars have shown that such transitional phenomena happen at higher redshifts and can occur in more luminous and massive systems. Until now, there were fewer than 20 known CL quasars. LaMassa et al. (2015) reported the first CL quasar, J0159+0033, which changed from Type 1 to Type 1.9. They demonstrated that variable absorption does not explain the observed timescales and large-scale obscuration material is needed for this scenario. Merloni et al. (2015) argued that J0159+0033 could be a luminous flare produced by a TDE. Runnoe et al. (2016) reported a CL quasar, J1011+5442, "turning-off" within a rest-frame time of approximately 500 days. They argued that the transition timescale is inconsistent with an abrupt change in the reddening toward the central engine, and the decaying light curve with a prolonged bright state preceding the decay is not consistent with a decaying TDE. If the type changes were caused by the obscuration of the quasar, high linear polarization would be expected (Hutsemékers et al. 2017; Marin 2017). Hutsemékers et al. (2017) measured the polarization of J1011+5442, and found null polarization, suggesting that the type transition was not due to variable obscuration. A rapid "turn-on" of a quasar, J1554+3629, was detected by iPTF on a timescale of less than one year (Gezari et al. 2017). They implied that a factor of 10 brightening in UV and X-ray continuum flux is more likely caused by an intrinsic change in the accretion rate. Some systematic archival searches for objects in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) with repeat spectroscopy found more CL quasars (MacLeod et al. 2016; Ruan et al. 2016). They implied that changes in the accretion rate can better explain the transition timescale and emission-line properties than variable dust obscuration. Sheng et al. (2017) argued that the large variability amplitude of CL AGNs in the mid-infrared supports the scenario in which changes in the accretion rate occurs for reasons other than varying obscuration. In a recent TDE (PS16dtm), broad Balmer emission lines appeared to be accompanied by a significant increase in the continuum flux, as well as strong Fe ii and He ii emissions (Blanchard et al. 2017).

The frequency and timescale of such transients in the universe are interesting issues. Martini & Schneider (2003) suggested that the number of turn-off quasars in a large number of quasars can be used to measure or set a lower limit on the episodic lifetime of quasars. In the search by MacLeod et al. (2016), out of more than 1000 quasars with g-band variability larger than one mag, only 10 objects showed variable broad emission lines (MacLeod et al. 2016). The majority of highly variable quasars did not exhibit emerging or disappearing broad emission lines. Rumbaugh et al. (2018) identified ∼1000 extreme variability quasars (EVQs) with a maximum g-band magnitude change of more than one mag with the SDSS and 3 Year Dark Energy Survey (DES, Flaugher 2005) imaging. They claimed that these EVQs are good candidates for CL AGNs.

CL AGNs provide perfect cases to study the connection between AGNs and their host galaxies. There is a tight correlation between BH mass, MBH, and the velocity dispersion, σ*, of the bulge component in nearby galaxies (Kormendy & Ho 2013). Gezari et al. (2017) reported that the ${M}_{\mathrm{BH}}\ ({2}_{-1.5}^{+4}\times {10}^{8}\,{M}_{\odot })$ of J1554+3629 (z = 0.237), estimated from the quasar spectrum after "turning on" with emerging broad Balmer emission lines, is in good agreement with its ${M}_{\mathrm{BH}}\ ({1}_{-0.7}^{+2}\times {10}^{8}\,{M}_{\odot })$ inferred from σ*. CL AGNs provide exceptional opportunities to provide the central BHs and their host galaxies at higher redshift. On the other hand, the "turning-off" CL quasars provide perfect opportunities to study the host galaxies of quasars in detail, avoiding contamination from the luminous central engines.

The CL AGNs, with the appearance or disappearance of broad Balmer lines on a timescale of years, challenge our understanding of the AGN unification model. Motivated by an interest in determining the physical mechanism behind type transitions, and questions regarding the frequency and timescale of the type transition, we conduct a survey for CL AGNs. The investigations consist of (1) repeat spectroscopy in the SDSS spectral archive, (2) repeat spectroscopy in the SDSS and the Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope (LAMOST) spectral archive, and (3) searching for CL candidates based on photometric variability.

This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the spectroscopic and imaging data. Section 3 outlines the selection methods and spectroscopic observations. In Section 4, we present new CL AGNs and their variability in the optical and mid-infrared. In Section 5, we discuss the CL AGN color variability and the timescale of the type transition. We summarize the paper in Section 6. In this work we adopt a standard ΛCDM cosmology with ΩΛ = 0.7, Ωm = 0.3, and H0 = 70 km s−1 Mpc−1. Throughout this paper, all magnitudes are in AB magnitudes.

2. Data

2.1. Spectroscopic Data

2.1.1. SDSS Spectroscopy

There are 4,851,200 spectra in the SDSS Fourteenth Data Release (DR14; Abolfathi et al. 2017) taken by the Sloan Foundation 2.5 m telescope (Gunn et al. 2006) at Apache Point Observatory. The spectra are from the SDSS-I/II, with a wavelength coverage from 3800 to 9100 Å, and the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS; Dawson et al. 2013) spectrograph of the SDSS-III (Eisenstein et al. 2011), with a wavelength coverage from 3600 to 10400 Å (Smee et al. 2013). The spectral resolution is 1500 at 3800 Å and 2500 at 9000 Å. The SDSS spectroscopic pipelines classify the objects as galaxies ("GALAXY"), stars ("STAR"), or quasars ("QSO"), through a comparison of individual spectra with galaxy, QSO, and stellar templates (Bolton et al. 2012; Hutchinson et al. 2016). The spectral quality is described by a confidence flag titled "zWarning," which is 0 or 16 for good data without identified problems (e.g., Stoughton et al. 2002). We carry out searches of CL AGNs from SDSS galaxies or quasars.

2.1.2. LAMOST Spectroscopy

LAMOST is a 4 m reflecting Schmidt telescope equipped with 4000 fibers with a 5° field of view (Cui et al. 2012; Zhao et al. 2012). The wavelength coverage of LAMOST ranges from 3700 Å to 9000 Å, with two arms (Du et al. 2016), a blue arm (3700–5900 Å) and a red arm (5700−9000 Å). The overall spectral resolution of LAMOST is approximately 1800. The data are reduced with LAMOST pipelines (Luo et al. 2012). In this paper, we utilize the LAMOST spectra from data releases one to five (Luo et al. 2015; He et al. 2016).

2.2. Imaging Data

CL AGNs showed continuum flux changes in the optical and mid-infrared. Apart from objects with repeat spectroscopy, we carry out additional searches of CL AGNs based on imaging data. We briefly introduce the imaging data as follows.

The SDSS imaging survey scanned the sky in five filters, ugriz (Fukugita et al. 1996), covering 11,663 deg2 in SDSS-I/II from 2000 to 2007 (Abazajian et al. 2009) and an additional 3,000 deg2 in SDSS-III in 2008.

The Pan-STARRS1 (PS1; Chambers et al. 2016) survey used a 1.8-meter telescope with a 1.4 Gigapixel camera to image the sky in five broadband filters (grizy). The observations cover three-quarters of the sky several times per filter. We use the PS1 magnitudes in the stack catalog, from co-added images made from the multiple exposures. Using a quasar composite spectrum from Vanden Berk et al. (2001) convolved with the PS1 and SDSS g-band filter curves (Equation (2) in Wu et al. 2004), the magnitude difference, δ(gPS1 − gSDSS), is between −0.065 mag and 0.008 mag at redshift z < 2.

The DESI Legacy imaging survey (DELS; Dey et al. 2018) commenced imaging surveys, including the DECam Legacy Survey (DECaLS) g-, r-, and z-bands, the g- and r-bands of the Beijing–Arizona Sky Survey (BASS; Zou et al. 2017), and the Mayall z-band Legacy Survey (MzLS). The imaging survey commenced from 2014 and will conclude in 2018, covering 14000 deg2 sky. The magnitude difference, δ(gDELS − gSDSS), is between −0.053 mag and 0.005 mag at z < 2, using the composite spectrum convolved with the DELS and SDSS g-band filter curves.

The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE; Wright et al. 2010) mapped the all-sky from 2010 January to July in four bands centered at wavelengths of 3.4, 4.6, 12, and 22 μm (W1, W2, W3, and W4). The secondary cryogen survey and Near-Earth Object Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (NEOWISE; Mainzer et al. 2011) Post-Cryogenic Mission mapped the sky from 2010 August to 2011 February. The NEOWISE Reactivation Mission (NEOWISE-R; Mainzer et al. 2014) surveys the sky in the W1 and W2 bands from 2013. We use WISE multi-epoch photometry from individual single-exposure images in the W1 and W2 bands.

The Catalina Real-time Transient Survey (CRTS; Drake et al. 2009) uses data from the Catalina Sky Survey, which repeatedly covers 26,000 deg2 on the sky. The CRTS photometric data are unfiltered and calibrated to V-band magnitude. We apply a constant offset to the CRTS magnitudes to match the simultaneous g-band PS1 magnitude.

The Palomar Transient Factory (PTF; Law et al. 2009) is a wide-field survey covering approximately 30,000 deg2 in the g- and r- bands from 2009 to 2012.

3. Target Selection and Observation

3.1. SDSS Repeat Spectroscopy

We carried out a systematic investigation in the SDSS DR14 spectral archive, in which 87% of spectra are good quality (zWarning = 0 or 16). Cross-matching the spectra with a radius of 2'' results in 350,609 objects repeatedly observed (≥2 epochs). There were 175,575 repeatedly observed objects classified as "GALAXY" by the SDSS pipeline in at least one epoch spectrum. Among them, 2,023 objects were classified as "GALAXY" in one epoch of the spectrum and "QSO" in another epoch of the spectrum. We visually checked all the spectra of these objects to search for CL AGNs.

Because the definitions of AGN spectral types depend on the strength of broad emission lines, we qualitatively define a detection of a broad emission line if the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of the emission line is higher than 5 or as a non-detection if the S/N is lower than 1. Specifically, a weak detection is when the S/N is between 1 and 3, and an intermediate detection is when the S/N is between 3 and 5. Visual checks cannot accurately discern the quantitative changes of emission lines, but they can qualitatively distinguish the cases with dramatic changes. More specifically, with a visual inspection it is easier to distinguish >5σ and <1σ detections than to distinguish 3σ–5σ and 1σ–3σ detections. Therefore, the visual inspection process is inclined to select AGNs that changed between Type 1 and Type 2 (or Type 1.9), with an appearing or disappearing broad Hα (or Hβ) emission line. Nevertheless, a visual check selects AGNs that changed between Type 1 and Type 1.8 with a lower completeness. Objects with distinct companions (within 2'') in the SDSS image were also excluded in the visual check process. From the visual inspection, we selected 9 CL AGNs. Four of the selected CL AGNs were reported previously, including the CL quasar J0159+0033 in LaMassa et al. (2015), J0126−0839 and J2336+0017 in Ruan et al. (2016), and J1011+5442 in Runnoe et al. (2016). We recovered all the changing-look quasars in these three works. The new CL AGNs found in the SDSS archive are J1104+6343, J1118+3203, J1150+3632, J1358+4934, and J1533+0110. We describe the objects rejected by visual inspection in the Appendix. In Section 4.1, we describe the fitting of the Hα and Hβ lines of these objects to quantitatively understand the changes of CL AGNs selected from visual inspection. The ratio of CL AGNs with an appearance or disappearance of broad Balmer emission lines is roughly 0.006%, for objects that were identified as galaxies and repeatedly observed. This ratio may be affected by some issues, for example, the time intervals of the repeat spectra, spectroscopic survey selection bias, spectral quality, and possible selection bias of visual inspection. The selection steps are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.  CL AGNs Selection from SDSS Repeat Spectra

Note Selection Number
Spectra in SDSS DR14 All 4,851,200 spectra
Spectra with good quality zWarning = 0 or 16 4,196,290 spectra
Objects with repeat spectra 2'' coordinates cross-match 350,609 objects
Galaxies with repeat spectra classified as "GALAXY" at one epoch 175,575 objects
Classification changed between QSO and Galaxy classified as "QSO" at another epoch 2,023 objects
Visual check appearing or disappearing broad Hβ 9 (4 known) CL AGNs

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

3.2. LAMOST and SDSS Repeat Spectroscopy

We cross-matched the LAMOST spectral archive with the SDSS spectra archive. The selection steps are summarized in Table 2. There were 155,220 objects that were classified as "GALAXY" (75%) or "QSO" (25%) with good spectral quality in the SDSS, or were observed in LAMOST. Comparing the SDSS spectra with the LAMOST spectra, we fit the Balmer emission lines in spectra from the SDSS and the LAMOST with Gaussian profiles. We selected the objects with changes in the emission-line flux density larger than 2 × 10−18 erg s−1 cm−2 Å−1, which is a conservative criterion avoiding missing CL AGNs at this step. There were 8,181 objects with potential emission-line variation. We visually inspected all these objects, and identified 10 CL AGNs, including 8 turn-on CL AGNs (J0831+3646, J0909+4747, J0937+2602, J1115+0544, J1132+0357, J1447+2833, J1545 +2511, and J1552+2737) and 2 turn-off AGNs (J0849+2747 and J1152+3209). We obtained flux calibrations to match the narrow emission-line flux of the SDSS spectra, assuming a constant narrow emission-line flux within a few tens of years. We describe the objects visually rejected in the Appendix. In this survey, about 0.007% of the galaxies from the LAMOST and SDSS cross-matched sample were proven to be CL AGNs with the appearance of broad Balmer emission lines.

Table 2.  CL AGNs Selection from SDSS and LAMOST Repeat Spectra

Note Selection Number
Spectra with good quality zWarning = 0 or 16 4,196,290 spectra
SDSS QSO/Galaxy classified as "GALAXY" or "QSO" 3,223,478 spectra
Repeatedly observed by LAMOST 2'' cross-match with LAMOST 155,220 objects
Possible variable Balmer lines program to automatically check emission-line variation 8,181 objects
Visual check appearing or disappearing broad Hβ 10 CL AGNs

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

3.3. Photometric Variability

Most of the reported CL AGNs were discovered by repeat spectroscopy. Meanwhile, the optical and mid-infrared flux of CL AGNs varies following the type transition. We conducted additional CL AGN searches based on photometric variability. We searched CL AGN candidates from objects that were spectroscopically identified as "GALAXY" but brightened in later photometric data, and from objects that were spectroscopically identified as "QSO" but significantly dimmed.

3.3.1. Turn-on CL AGNs Selected from Imaging Data

We carried out a search for turn-on CL AGNs from SDSS galaxies, which became brighter later. The selection procedures are shown in Table 3. Motivated by the rapid transition that happened in J1011+5442 and J1554+3629, we first considered recent imaging data. The WISE multi-epoch data are available for recent years, from 2010 to 2017. We started from galaxies detected by WISE multi-epoch data, and there were 28,395 galaxies that became brighter (ΔW1 < −0.2 mag) and redder (${\rm{\Delta }}(W1-W2)\gt 0.1$ mag) in the mid-infrared. A more detailed discussion about the color criteria in the mid-infrared will be provided in Section 5.1. Among them, 2147 galaxies also became brighter in the optical g-band and had g < 19 mag. We checked the CRTS and PTF light curves of these galaxies at z > 0.1, and picked out 59 turn-on CL AGN candidates with a clear trend of increasing flux in the optical and mid-infrared. This selection method recovered J0831+3646 and J1554+3629. Other turn-on CL AGNs from repeat spectroscopy were missed in this process due to smaller redshift or smaller variability. More systematic searches can be extended to lower redshifts and fainter objects with less variability.

Table 3.  Turn-on CL AGN Candidate Selection Based on Imaging Data

Note Selection Number
Spectra in SDSS DR14 all 4,851,200 spectra
WISE single-epoch detected 2'' cross-match with the WISE single-epoch data 4,196,290 spectra
Galaxies with good spectra class="GALAXY" and (zWarning = 0 or 16) 2,494,319 spectra
WISE brighten and redder ΔW1 < −0.2 and Δ(W1 − W2) > 0.1 28,395 objects
Optical brighten Δg < 0 and g < 19 2147 objects
Redshift z > 0.1 660 objects
Visual check light curves obvious brighten trend (CRTS/PTF) 59 objects
Observed 17 objects
Confirmed 6 (1 known) CL AGNs

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Optical long-slit spectroscopic observations for some CL AGN candidates were carried out using the Xinglong 2.16 m telescope (XLT) in China and Palomar P200/DBSP spectrograph. The Xinglong 2.16 m telescope is located at the NAOC observatory. It is equipped with the Beijing Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera (BFOSC). We observed 17 CL AGN candidates in 2017 April, including a CL AGN J1554+3629 discovered by Gezari et al. (2017), using the BFOSC and Grism 4 (G4) with a dispersion of 198 Å/mm and a wavelength coverage from 3850 to 8300 Å. The grism yields a resolution of R ∼ 265 or 340 at 5000 Å using a 2farcs3 or 1farcs8 slit (Fan et al. 2016). The spectra were obtained using a 1farcs8 slit when seeing <2'' or a 2farcs3 slit when 2'' < seeing < 3''. J1259+5515 was observed by DBSP after it was observed by XLT. The DBSP spectrum was obtained using P200/DBSP with grating G600 at the blue side (R ∼ 1200 at 5000 Å) and G316 at the red side (R ∼ 642 at 5000 Å) with a 1farcs5 slit under seeing ∼1farcs5. The spectra were reduced using standard IRAF4 routines (Tody 1986, 1993). The flux of J1259+5515 obtained with DBSP and XLT in two days are in good agreement. Five new CL AGNs (J1003+3525, J1110-0003, J1259+5515, J1319+6753, and J1550+4139), with emerging broad Hβ, were confirmed by the XLT and DBSP spectra. The fiber diameters of SDSS, BOSS, and LAMOST are 3'', 2'', and 3farcs3, respectively. The fiber diameters are large enough to include the light from the nuclear. The slit widths of long-slit spectra are slightly smaller than the fiber diameters, leading to less host galaxy light contributions to the spectra. The photometric variability of these CL AGNs rules out the possibility that the different spectra are merely caused by differences between fiber and slit spectra.

3.4. Turn-off CL AGNs Selected from Imaging Data

We conducted a survey of turn-off CL AGNs from SDSS quasar catalogs (shown in Table 4). There are 346,464 quasars (Yang et al. 2017) in the SDSS Data Release 7 Quasar catalog (Schneider et al. 2010) and the Data Release 12 Quasar catalog (Pâris et al. 2017). Cross-matching with a radius of 2'', 94% of quasars were detected in the WISE multi-epoch data. There were 6,847 quasars that dimmed (ΔW1 > 0.2 mag) and became bluer (Δ(W1 − W2) < −0.1 mag) in the mid-infrared.

Table 4.  Turn-off CL AGN Candidate Selection Based on Imaging Data

Note Selection Number
SDSS QSO in DR7 and DR12 All 346,464 objects
WISE single-epoch detected 2'' cross-match with the WISE single-epoch photometry 326,124 objects
WISE dim and bluer ΔW1 > 0.2 and Δ(W1 − W2) < −0.1 6,847 objects
Optical dim Δg > 1 232 objects
Observed 1 objects
Confirmed 1 CL AGN c

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

On a timescale of months to years, the continuum variability of quasars is typically 0.2 mag in the optical (e.g., Vanden Berk et al. 2004; Wilhite et al. 2005; MacLeod et al. 2012). Among the quasars with mid-infrared variability, 232 quasars also dimmed significantly in the optical (more than 1 mag in the g-band). We recovered two turn-off CL AGNs, including J0849+2747 and J1011+5442. In 2017 April, we observed one candidate (with the XLT using a 2farcs3 slit), J1104+0118, with g-band and W1-band magnitudes dimmed by more than 1.8 mag and 0.6 mag, respectively. The continuum flux of J1104+0118 obviously became much redder than that in the SDSS spectrum, and the broad Mg ii emission line was not detected in the new spectrum. Higher-quality spectra are needed for a more detailed analysis A more complete survey of CL AGNs will require more spectroscopic follow-up.

4. Results

4.1. New CL AGNs

In total, there are 21 new CL AGNs found in our surveys (summarized in Table 5). Among the new CL AGNs, 5 were found by repeat spectra from the SDSS, 10 were discovered based on repeat spectra from SDSS and LAMOST, and 6 were selected from photometric variability in optical and mid-infrared imaging data, and confirmed by new spectroscopy. The five known CL AGNs that we recovered are also listed in Table 5. Figure 1 shows an example of the light curves (left panels), and spectra (right panels) of a new CL AGN, J0831+3646. The light curves and spectra of the other 20 new CL AGNs are listed in the Appendix. In Figure 1, the spectra separating for 13 years show that there was no Hβ emission in 2002 in the SDSS (black), while the broad Hβ, as well as broad Hα, emission lines emerged in the spectra taken in 2015 in LAMOST (blue). The residual spectrum (gray spectrum at the bottom of the right panel), between the bright epoch and faint epoch spectra, distinctly shows the emerging of broad Hβ and Hα. The left panel in Figure 1 shows the photometric data from several surveys, including SDSS, PS1, DELS, WISE, CRTS, and PTF. The imaging data taken in separated epochs help identify the variability of objects.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Example of the light curves (left panel) and spectra (right panel) of a new CL AGN, J0831+3646. In the left panel, all photometric data are expressed in magnitude, and the x-axis is MJD−50000. Photometric data in distinct bands are shown in different colors, including the g (green), r (yellow), W1 (magenta), and W2 (cyan) band photometry. The different shapes represent data from different surveys, including SDSS (open square), PS1 (open circle), DELS (open diamond), WISE W1 (solid triangle), WISE W2 (cross), CRTS (solid dots), and PTF (x shape). The vertical dashed lines show the epochs of the spectra. The right panel shows the spectral flux density, fλ, of CL AGNs in units of 10−17 erg s−1 cm−2 Å−1. The early-epoch SDSS spectrum is plotted in black, and the new epoch spectrum is colored blue if the AGN turned on, or red if the AGN turned off. The lower panel shows the spectra difference, Δfλ, between the bright epoch and faint epoch spectra. The vertical bars mark the locations of appeared or disappeared broad emission lines. The light curves and spectra of the other 20 CL AGNs are in the Appendix.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 5.  CL AGNs

Name R.A. Decl. Redshift Transition Epoch Instrument2 References
J0831+3646 08:31:32.25 +36:46:17.2 0.19501 Turn-on [52312, 57367] LAMOST This work
J0849+2747 08:49:57.78 +27:47:28.9 0.29854 Turn-off [53350, 56628] LAMOST This work
J0909+4747 09:09:32.02 +47:47:30.6 0.11694 Turn-on [52620, 57745] LAMOST This work
J0937+2602 09:37:30.32 +26:02:32.1 0.16219 Turn-on [54524, 57369] LAMOST This work
J1003+3525 10:03:23.47 +35:25:03.8 0.11886 Turn-on [53389, 57867] XLT This work
J1104+0118 11:04:55.17 +01:18:56.6 0.57514 Turn-off [52374, 57867] XLT This work
J1104+6343 11:04:23.21 +63:43:05.3 0.16427 Turn-off [52370, 54498] SDSS This work
J1110−0003 11:10:25.44 −00:03:34.0 0.21922 Turn-on [51984, 57864] XLT This work
J1115+0544 11:15:36.57 +05:44:49.7 0.08995 Turn-on [52326, 57393] LAMOST This work
J1118+3203 11:18:29.64 +32:03:59.9 0.3651 Turn-off [53431, 56367] BOSS This work
J1132+0357 11:32:29.14 +03:57:29.0 0.09089 Turn-on [52642, 57392] LAMOST This work
J1150+3632 11:50:39.32 +36:32:58.4 0.34004 Turn-off [53436, 57422] BOSS This work
J1152+3209 11:52:27.48 +32:09:59.4 0.37432 Turn-off [53446, 57844] LAMOST This work
J1259+5515 12:59:16.74 +55:15:07.2 0.19865 Turn-on [52707, 57863] XLT/DBSP This work
J1319+6753 13:19:30.75 +67:53:55.4 0.16643 Turn-on [51988, 57867] XLT This work
J1358+4934 13:58:55.82 +49:34:14.1 0.11592 Turn-on [53438, 54553] SDSS This work
J1447+2833 14:47:54.23 +28:33:24.1 0.16344 Turn-on [53764, 57071] LAMOST This work
J1533+0110 15:33:55.99 +01:10:29.7 0.14268 Turn-on [51989, 54561] SDSS This work
J1545+2511 15:45:29.64 +25:11:27.9 0.11696 Turn-on [53846, 57891] LAMOST This work
J1550+4139 15:50:17.24 +41:39:02.2 0.22014 Turn-on [52468, 57864] XLT This work
J1552+2737 15:52:58.30 +27:37:28.4 0.08648 Turn-on [53498, 56722] LAMOST This work
J0126−0839 01:26:48.08 −08:39:48.0 0.19791 Turn-off [52163, 54465] SDSS Ruan et al. (2016)
J0159+0033 01:59:57.64 +00:33:10.5 0.31204 Turn-off [51871, 55201] BOSS LaMassa et al. (2015)
J1011+5442 10:11:52.98 +54:42:06.4 0.24639 Turn-off [52652, 57073] BOSS Runnoe et al. (2016)
J1554+3629 15:54:40.26 +36:29:51.9 0.23683 Turn-on [53172, 57862] XLT Gezari et al. (2017)
J2336+0017 23:36:02.98 +00:17:28.7 0.24283 Turn-off [52199, 55449] BOSS Ruan et al. (2016)

Note. "Epoch" shows the MJD of the two epoch spectra. "Instrument2" indicates the spectrograph or telescope of the recent spectrum. XLT represents the Xinglong 2.16 m telescope at NAOC.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

We fit the spectra of all the CL AGNs with a quasar spectral fitting procedure (QSfit, Calderone et al. 2017), considering the contribution from the AGN continuum, Balmer continuum, host galaxy, blended iron lines, broad emission lines, and narrow emission lines. The spectroscopic measurements are summarized in Table 6. The later epoch spectrum is calibrated to the earlier SDSS spectrum assuming a constant narrow emission line during a few years. Only in 4 out of these 21 objects is the S/N of the faint-state spectrum lower than that of the bright state spectrum. The weaker Balmer emission-line intensity at the faint state is not a result of a worse observational condition.

Table 6.  Spectral Type Transition of CL AGNs

Name Redshift λL5100 S/N1 S/N2 LHβ,1 LHβ,2 LHα,1 LHα,2 ${\rm{S}}/{{\rm{N}}}_{{\rm{H}}{\beta }_{1}}$ ${\rm{S}}/{{\rm{N}}}_{{\rm{H}}{\beta }_{2}}$ ${\rm{S}}/{{\rm{N}}}_{{\rm{H}}{\alpha }_{1}}$ ${\rm{S}}/{{\rm{N}}}_{{\rm{H}}{\alpha }_{2}}$ E1 E2 Type
    (1042 erg s−1)     (1041 erg s−1) (1041 erg s−1) (1041 erg s−1) (1041 erg s−1)          
J0831+3646 0.19501 18.23 ± 0.24 12.3 10.9 −4.05 ± 0.33 2.85 ± 0.39 3.60 ± 1.00 10.19 ± 0.42 −12.1 7.3 3.6 24.2 2 1 on
J0849+2747 0.29854 63.42 ± 1.48 9.3 2.7 8.56 ± 0.39 −2.81 ± 2.03 22.76 ± 1.95 2.49 ± 0.97 22.2 −1.4 11.7 2.6 1 2 off
J0909+4747 0.11694 6.97 ± 0.20 11.0 8.5 −1.88 ± 0.13 1.32 ± 0.18 1.48 ± 0.13 7.39 ± 0.13 −14.9 7.5 11.8 57.1 1.9 1 on
J0937+2602 0.16219 6.85 ± 0.32 20.9 7.1 −1.71 ± 0.13 1.75 ± 0.20 3.66 ± 0.24 11.93 ± 2.04 −12.8 8.6 15.4 5.9 1.9 1 on
J1003+3525 0.11886 45.77 ± 1.64 15.6 6.9 −1.40 ± 0.12 10.30 ± 1.02 2.34 ± 0.57 12.58 ± 0.63 −11.7 10.1 4.1 19.9 2 1 on
J1104+0118 0.57514 302.41 ± 6.30 7.0 0.7 79.89 ± 5.19 −43.38 ± 13.61 15.4 −3.2 1 2 off
J1104+6343 0.16427 4.46 ± 0.49 6.0 6.1 1.14 ± 0.14 0.33 ± 0.11 4.90 ± 0.16 0.79 ± 0.13 7.9 3.0 31.6 6.2 1 1.8 off
J1110−0003 0.21922 48.61 ± 1.34 8.0 6.1 0.27 ± 0.10 6.70 ± 0.92 1.78 ± 0.71 11.98 ± 1.01 2.8 7.3 2.5 11.9 2 1 on
J1115+0544 0.08995 17.27 ± 0.27 18.9 8.7 −1.23 ± 0.07 2.46 ± 0.18 0.05 ± 0.07 7.92 ± 1.11 −18.4 14.0 0.7 7.2 2 1 on
J1118+3203 0.3651 56.48 ± 2.29 4.9 4.9 11.76 ± 1.11 2.90 ± 0.51 10.31 ± 0.57 10.6 5.7 18.0 1 1 off*
J1132+0357 0.09089 16.26 ± 0.38 17.3 7.4 −3.23 ± 0.08 4.74 ± 0.40 0.78 ± 0.05 2.40 ± 0.17 −40.2 11.8 15.9 14.1 1.9 1 on
J1150+3632 0.34004 39.01 ± 2.28 4.9 5.2 5.02 ± 0.53 −3.29 ± 0.49 22.24 ± 1.25 3.18 ± 0.40 9.4 −6.7 17.8 7.9 1 1.9 off
J1152+3209 0.37432 138.05 ± 2.68 11.9 3.7 38.31 ± 1.16 10.53 ± 1.29 33.0 8.2 1 1 off*
J1259+5515 0.19865 17.95 ± 0.91 7.4 3.5 0.02 ± 0.24 5.53 ± 0.82 4.30 ± 0.38 9.21 ± 3.88 0.1 6.8 11.4 2.4 1.9 1 on
J1319+6753 0.16643 30.90 ± 1.46 12.1 7.3 0.36 ± 0.33 7.96 ± 1.16 2.37 ± 0.27 5.90 ± 4.43 1.1 6.8 8.6 1.3 1.9 1 on
J1358+4934 0.11592 5.50 ± 0.19 7.8 13.1 0.36 ± 0.09 0.96 ± 0.10 0.74 ± 0.06 1.98 ± 0.10 3.8 9.2 13.4 19.0 1.9 1 on
J1447+2833 0.16344 66.68 ± 0.97 7.8 13.1 −1.16 ± 0.29 2.49 ± 0.24 2.27 ± 0.19 11.63 ± 0.25 −3.9 10.6 12.2 47.2 1.9 1 on
J1533+0110 0.14268 <1.00 14.2 13.4 −3.98 ± 0.17 0.54 ± 0.12 1.00 ± 0.15 3.97 ± 0.29 −23.6 4.4 6.9 13.7 1.9 1.5 on
J1545+2511 0.11696 6.81 ± 0.06 19.6 17.1 −2.16 ± 0.15 0.71 ± 0.11 1.69 ± 0.12 5.90 ± 0.14 −14.4 6.7 14.4 41.3 1.9 1 on
J1550+4139 0.22014 28.26 ± 1.30 11.6 8.1 −4.41 ± 0.47 15.71 ± 1.48 2.47 ± 0.40 14.01 ± 0.89 −9.5 10.6 6.2 15.8 1.9 1 on
J1552+2737 0.08648 <1.00 12.3 7.8 −3.67 ± 0.05 −1.34 ± 0.10 0.38 ± 0.04 2.70 ± 0.05 −69.2 −13.9 9.8 59.1 1.9 1.9 on*

Note. λL5100 is the continuum luminosity at 5100 Å in the bright epoch spectrum. J1533+0110 and J1552+2737 are too red to fit a power-law continuum, with a upper limit of 1.00 × 1042 erg s−1. S/N1 and S/N2 are the median S/N pixel−1 of the former and recent epoch spectra, respectively. LHβ,1, (LHα,1) and LHβ,2 (LHα,2) are the luminosities of the broad Hβ (Hα) component in the former and recent epoch spectra. The negative luminosity means that there is absorption instead of emission lines. There is no Hα data when Hα moves out of the range of the spectrum. ${\rm{S}}/{{\rm{N}}}_{{\rm{H}}{\beta }_{1}}$ (${\rm{S}}/{{\rm{N}}}_{{\rm{H}}{\alpha }_{1}}$) and ${\rm{S}}/{{\rm{N}}}_{{\rm{H}}{\beta }_{2}}$ (${\rm{S}}/{{\rm{N}}}_{{\rm{H}}{\alpha }_{2}}$) are the S/Ns of broad Hβ (Hα) components in the former and recent epoch spectra. E1 and E2 describe the spectral types of the former and recent epoch spectra. Type describes the transition type.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

According to the definition of AGN spectral types, we mark the spectral type as Type 1 when there are (>5σ) broad Hβ components detected and Type 2 when the S/N of the broad Hα is lower than 5. Specifically, when (>5σ) Hα is detected, we mark the spectal type as Type 1.9 (1.8 or 1.5) when there is no, <1σ, (weak, 1σ–3σ, or intermediate, 3σ–5σ) broad Hβ detected. As the Balmer emission lines disappeared in some spectra, we freed the parameter limit of the amplitude of the line fitting, which was assumed to be positive. The fitting results are shown in Table 6. The negative luminosity means that there is absorption instead of emission lines. As shown in Table 6, six CL AGNs transitioned between Type 1 and Type 2 classes, and 10 CL AGNs transitioned between Type 1 and Type 1.9 classes. In addition, the fitting procedure recognizes >5σ broad Hβ emission lines in both bright and faint-state spectra of J1118+3203 and J1152+3209, and <1σ broad Hβ lines in both bright and faint-state spectra of J1552+2737. Therefore, these three AGNs fail to fit the quantitative definition above. While the dramatic Hβ luminosity changes show that Hβ faded in J1118+3203 and J1152+3209 (marked as "off*" in Table 6) and enhanced in J1152+3209 (marked as "on*" in Table 6). Among them, 15 AGNs turned on, with broad Balmer emission lines emerging (or enhancing), as well as increased broadband flux. The broad Balmer lines of 6 CL AGNs disappeared (or faded), accompanied by dimming in the continuum. Among the 21 CL AGNs, 17 CL AGNs showed broad Hα, Hβ, Hγ, or even Hδ appeared or disappeared. Only broad Hα and Hβ changes were detected in J0831+3646, J1319+6753, and J1552+2737; clear emerging of broad Hα and Hβ emission lines, and increased flux in the optical and mid-infrared, confirmed their changes.

4.2. CL AGN Optical and Mid-infrared Variability

The continuum flux varies along with the CL AGN type transition. Table 7 summarizes the photometric variability of CL AGNs. We obtain the g-band variability, Δg, from the magnitude offset between the PS1 g-band magnitude, or the DELS g-band magnitude when available, and the SDSS g-band magnitude. We use the first epoch SDSS photometry if there are data at more than one epoch. The uncertainties of Δg are calculated from propagation of SDSS g-band magnitude uncertainty and PS1 g-band magnitude uncertainty, or the DELS g-band magnitude uncertainty when available. Similarly, the g − r color variation, Δ(g − r), is calculated by the color offset between PS1 g − r color, or the DELS g − r color when available, and the SDSS g − r color. The g-band variability ranges from −1.89 to 0.52 mag in this sample. As in some CL AGN cases, the PS1 or DELS images were taken before the type transition. We also calculate the spectrophotometry with the spectra convolved with the SDSS filters. The spectrophotometry are calibrated by setting the first epoch SDSS spectrophotometry equal to the SDSS photometry at the closest epoch. The variations of spectrophotometry in the g-band and g − r color are also listed in Table 7. In the mid-infrared, there is a series of exposures within one day with a long interval of half a year in WISE multi-epoch data. We calculate the 3σ-clipped mean magnitude of WISE in W1 and W2 every half a year. The uncertainties of W1 and W2 are obtained from the 3σ-clipped standard deviation of W1 and W2 magnitude every half a year. There are less than 10 epochs of WISE mean magnitude for a single object. For the turn-on objects, the WISE variability is calculated from the offset between the brightest epoch photometry and the first epoch photometry. For turn-off objects, the WISE variability is calculated from the offset between the last epoch photometry and the brightest epoch photometry. The magnitude and color variability are calculated between the later epoch and the former epoch. Therefore, the magnitude variability is negative if an object becomes brighter, and the color variability is negative if the object becomes bluer. Figure 2 shows the optical broadband flux changes along with mid-infrared flux. In our sample, the mid-infrared variability ΔW1 ranges from −1.01 to 0.68, and 15 of them varied for more than 0.2 mag ($| {\rm{\Delta }}W1| \gt 0.2$ mag). The mid-infrared flux is not significantly affected by dust extinction (Weingartner & Draine 2001). In the scenario of variable obscuration, the variation in the W1 band due to dust extinction yields a factor of ∼21 variability in g-band magnitude, according to the extinction curve in the optical and mid-infrared even considering micrometer-sized grains (Wang et al. 2015). A variability of 0.2 mag in the W1 band suggests approximately 4.2 mag variability in the g-band. The optical variability, from photometric and spectrophotometric data, is not consistent with the scenario of variable obscuration in 10 CL AGNs in our sample at more than the 3σ confidence level (J0831+3646, J0937+2602, J1003+3525, J1104+0118, J1110−0003, J1115+0544, J1132+0357, J1259+5515, J1447+2833, and J1550+4139) and in eight CL AGNs between the 1σ and 3σ confidence levels (J0849+2747, J1104+6343, J1150+3632, J1152+3209, J1319+6753, J1533+0110, J1545+2511, and J1552+2737). The accuracy of the spectrophotometry is lower than that of the photometry. Following-up with high-accuracy photometric data after the type transition can better constrain the mechanism of type transition. Using mid-infrared variability to select CL AGNs, we were inclined to select CL AGNs with intrinsic changes instead of varying obscuration.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. Variability of CL AGNs in the optical g-band and mid-infrared W1 band. The broadband fluxes in the optical and mid-infrared have the same trend. The CL AGNs marked as black dots are from repeat spectroscopy, and the blue pentagon shows CL AGNs selected from variable photometry. The region in the bottom left, where both the g- and W1-bands brighten, is a region for turn-on CL AGN selection; the top right area, where both g and W1 are dimmed, is useful for turn-off CL AGN selection. The gray dots and the contours shows quasars with a similar redshift range, z < 0.7.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 7.  Variability of Changing-look AGNs

Name Survey Δgphot ${\rm{\Delta }}{(g-r)}_{\mathrm{phot}}$ Δgspec ${\rm{\Delta }}{(g-r)}_{\mathrm{spec}}$ ΔW1 Δ(W1 − W2) δCRTS
    (mag) (mag) (mag) (mag) (mag) (mag) (mag)
J0831+3646 DELS −0.41 ± 0.01 −0.35 ± 0.02 −0.57 ± 0.37 −0.48 ± 0.49 −0.35 ± 0.10 0.13 ± 0.14 1.15
J0849+2747 DELS 0.31 ± 0.01 0.29 ± 0.02 1.00 ± 0.65 0.69 ± 0.80 0.28 ± 0.13 −0.24 ± 0.21 1.17
J0909+4747 PS1 0.06 ± 0.01 −0.03 ± 0.02 −0.71 ± 0.29 −0.39 ± 0.39 −0.42 ± 0.10 0.10 ± 0.18 0.90
J0937+2602 DELS −0.17 ± 0.01 −0.06 ± 0.01 −0.29 ± 0.32 −0.24 ± 0.44 −0.41 ± 0.10 0.07 ± 0.15 0.92
J1003+3525 DELS −0.52 ± 0.01 −0.27 ± 0.01 −1.17 ± 0.21 −0.54 ± 0.29 −0.58 ± 0.16 0.16 ± 0.26 0.92
J1104+0118 DELS 1.89 ± 0.03 1.48 ± 0.04 6.14 ± 111.71 4.98 ± 111.72 0.68 ± 0.11 −0.56 ± 0.26 1.68
J1104+6343 PS1 0.55 ± 0.02 0.44 ± 0.03 0.08 ± 0.46 0.11 ± 0.53 0.31 ± 0.24 0.03 ± 0.36 0.93
J1110−0003 DELS −0.42 ± 0.02 −0.33 ± 0.02 −0.87 ± 0.40 −0.43 ± 0.53 −0.65 ± 0.12 0.11 ± 0.27 0.95
J1115+0544 DELS −0.21 ± 0.01 −0.11 ± 0.01 −0.82 ± 0.22 −0.44 ± 0.30 −1.01 ± 0.10 0.59 ± 0.16 0.97
J1118+3203 PS1 0.67 ± 0.04 0.49 ± 0.05 0.80 ± 0.33 0.30 ± 0.43 0.15 ± 0.41 0.20 ± 0.58 1.50
J1132+0357 PS1 −0.11 ± 0.01 −0.15 ± 0.01 −1.16 ± 0.19 −0.55 ± 0.26 −0.56 ± 0.05 0.19 ± 0.12 0.91
J1150+3632 DELS 1.59 ± 0.02 0.92 ± 0.03 0.95 ± 0.41 0.50 ± 0.47 0.30 ± 0.24 0.18 ± 0.37 1.38
J1152+3209 PS1 1.36 ± 0.03 0.99 ± 0.03 1.39 ± 0.60 0.84 ± 0.76 0.19 ± 0.08 −0.27 ± 0.13
J1259+5515 DELS −0.06 ± 0.02 −0.05 ± 0.02 −0.77 ± 0.93 −0.40 ± 0.99 −0.54 ± 0.10 0.26 ± 0.26 1.06
J1319+6753 PS1 −0.28 ± 0.01 −0.26 ± 0.01 −0.46 ± 0.40 −0.17 ± 0.47 −0.23 ± 0.07 0.10 ± 0.12 0.70
J1358+4934 DELS 0.41 ± 0.01 0.20 ± 0.02 −0.46 ± 0.20 −0.15 ± 0.24 0.00 ± 0.16 0.00 ± 0.23 0.80
J1447+2833 PS1 −0.15 ± 0.01 −0.18 ± 0.01 −0.72 ± 0.20 −0.46 ± 0.29 −0.45 ± 0.05 0.06 ± 0.08 0.85
J1533+0110 DELS −0.14 ± 0.01 −0.05 ± 0.01 −0.28 ± 0.18 −0.21 ± 0.20 −0.12 ± 0.06 0.05 ± 0.15 1.13
J1545+2511 PS1 −0.16 ± 0.01 −0.14 ± 0.01 −0.16 ± 0.48 0.03 ± 0.52 −0.10 ± 0.04 0.14 ± 0.07 0.84
J1550+4139 DELS −0.25 ± 0.01 −0.13 ± 0.02 −0.55 ± 0.49 −0.24 ± 0.57 −0.34 ± 0.06 0.12 ± 0.15 1.14
J1552+2737 PS1 0.03 ± 0.01 −0.26 ± 0.01 −0.45 ± 0.36 −0.37 ± 0.47 −0.25 ± 0.08 0.12 ± 0.17 0.89
J0126−0839 PS1 0.43 ± 0.01 0.15 ± 0.02 0.29 ± 0.18 0.25 ± 0.21 0.00 ± 0.09 0.00 ± 0.27 0.91
J0159+0033 DELS 0.28 ± 0.02 0.22 ± 0.02 1.15 ± 0.24 0.60 ± 0.28 0.12 ± 0.21 −0.01 ± 0.41 0.95
J1011+5442 PS1 1.04 ± 0.02 0.53 ± 0.02 1.91 ± 0.12 0.46 ± 0.15 1.30 ± 0.21 −0.50 ± 0.36 0.86
J1554+3629 DELS −0.56 ± 0.01 −0.42 ± 0.02 −1.37 ± 0.39 −0.67 ± 0.49 −0.74 ± 0.08 0.16 ± 0.17 1.22
J2336+0017 DELS 0.41 ± 0.02 0.30 ± 0.02 0.41 ± 0.40 0.22 ± 0.45 0.14 ± 0.28 −0.17 ± 0.42 1.06

Note. Δgphot and ${\rm{\Delta }}{(g-r)}_{\mathrm{phot}}$ are the g-band variability and g − r color variability from imaging data, while Δgspec and ${\rm{\Delta }}{(g-r)}_{\mathrm{spec}}$ are from spectrophotometry.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

5. Discussion

5.1. CL AGNs Color Variability

The optical and mid-infrared colors vary following flux changes. Figure 3 shows the color variability versus the magnitude variability in the optical (left panel) and mid-infrared (right panel). The bluer-when-brighter trend is a known trend in the optical (e.g., Wilhite et al. 2005; Schmidt et al. 2012; Zuo et al. 2012; Ruan et al. 2014). In the mid-infrared, there is a trend in which W1–W2 is redder when brighter. A similar W1–W2 color dependence on AGN luminosity is reported in the Swift/Burst Alert Telescope AGN sample (Ichikawa et al. 2017).

Figure 3.

Figure 3. Color variability vs. magnitude variability of CL AGNs in the optical (left panel) and mid-infrared (right panel). A bluer-when-brighter chromatism is confirmed in the optical. However, the mid-infrared W1–W2 color is redder when brighter. The opposite color change trend in the mid-infrared is possibly due to a stronger contribution from the AGN dust torus when the AGN turns on.

Standard image High-resolution image

The global SED variation helps to clarify the color changes in the infrared. We construct the infrared SED using the WISE data and the near-infrared data from the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS; Skrutskie et al. 2006), which scanned the entire sky from 1997 to 2001 in three bands: J (1.25 μm), H (1.65 μm), and Ks (2.17 μm). Because there are no multi-epoch near-infrared and WISE W3 and W4 data, we show examples of two different objects in Figure 4. The two objects are J1115+0544 (left panel) at the faint state before it turned on and J0849+2747 (right panel) before it turned off.

Figure 4.

Figure 4. Infrared SED of two CL AGNs, J1115+0544 (left panel) and J0849+2747 (right panel). The green, red, and brown dashed lines are the BC03, CAT3D, and the combined models, while the light dotted lines are 100 random samples of the final model and each component from the MCMC method to demonstrate the uncertainty of the fitting. The black circles with error bars are the observed data (2MASS J, H, Ks, and WISE W1, W2, W3, W4 data from short to long wavelengths). The empty squares are the modeled photometric data at the observed bands.

Standard image High-resolution image

We fit the SED with the stellar and dust torus emission components. The simple stellar synthesis model by Bruzual & Charlot (2003, hereafter BC03) with an age of 5 Gyr and solar metallicity is used for the stellar emission. The dust torus component is described by a new version of the radiative transfer model CAT3D (Hönig & Kishimoto 2017). Due to limitations of the data, we adopt the templates without the wind component. We perform the SED fitting with a new Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method (Shangguan et al. 2018) combining the stellar and dust torus models.

In the SED before the AGN turned on, the W1 and W2 bands generally follow the stellar emission. In the SED after the AGN turned on, the W1 and W2 bands, especially W2, were strongly affected by the dust torus radiation. Therefore, it is possible that the W1–W2 shows as blue without a strong AGN contribution, and turns out to be red after the AGN turning on. Thus the mid-infrared W1–W2 color of CL AGNs turns to be redder when brighter.

In the optical, the color–magnitude variation relation (dashed line in left panel in Figure 3) of CL AGNs (listed in Table 5) is fitted by a least-squares fitting algorithm as

Equation (1)

The CL AGNs selected from repeat spectroscopy are not biased by WISE variability selection criteria. For CL AGNs selected from repeat spectroscopy, the mid-infrared color–magnitude relation (dotted line in left panel in Figure 3) is fitted as

Equation (2)

Thus, a selection criterion based on mid-infrared variability as $| {\rm{\Delta }}(W1-W2)| \gt 0.1$ when $| {\rm{\Delta }}W1| \gt 0.2$, is reasonable. With all the CL AGNs (in Table 5), the color–magnitude relation in the mid-infrared (dashed line in the left panel in Figure 3) is fitted as

Equation (3)

The CL AGNs, selected from WISE variability, obey the color–magnitude relation well. The mid-infrared variability and color variability are good tracers for CL AGNs with intrinsic changes.

5.2. The Timescale of the Type Transition

The current data coverage is not good enough to measure the timescale of transition. Therefore, we only roughly estimate the upper limit of type transition as follows. The upper limit of the transition timescale is obtained by the time interval between the former and recent spectroscopic epoch (Δtspec in the rest-frame in Table 8). We further prescribe a limit to the timescale with the light curve changes approaching the transition. For example, although the two spectra of J1115+0544 were separated by 14 years, there was no variability detected in SDSS, PS1, and CRTS imaging data. The rapid flux brightening was detected by WISE in 2015. The W1 of J1115+0544 increased for more than 1 mag in a short interval, less than one year in the rest-frame. The light curves of CL AGNs keep quiescent at faint states, namely before the transition of turn-on CL AGNs or after the transition of turn-off CL AGNs. The CL AGNs usually vary in their AGN phase. In some cases (for example, J0831+3646, J1110−0003, J1115+0544, J1259+5515, and J1319+6753), the WISE flux increased when the AGN turned on, and decreased with a smaller amplitude later on, possibly due to the variability of the AGN accretion rate. On the other hand, it is also possible that the flux increase is due to the TDEs instead of AGN activity. In this scenario, the later light curve should continually decrease following the typical light curve of TDEs, which is proportional to t−5/3 (Rees 1988; Lodato et al. 2009; Guillochon & Ramirez-Ruiz2013). Follow-up photometric data are needed to distinguish the scenarios of AGN accretion rate variability and TDEs. The epoch approaching the type transition is obtained by a recent quiescent image epoch at the faint state, or the brightest image epoch in their AGN phase. In Table 8, Epoch1* and Epoch2* show the imaging data epochs (and imaging survey) approaching the transition before and after the type transition. Δt, obtained from photometric variation approaching the type transition when available, is a better upper limit of the transition timescale in the rest-frame than Δtspec. Therefore, the upper limit of the type transition timescales ranges from 0.9 to 12.6 years in the rest-frame.

Table 8.  Timescale of Changing-look AGN Transition

Name Redshift Epoch1 Epoch2 Δtspec Epoch1* Epoch2* Δt
        (years)     (years)
J0831+3646 0.19501 52312 57367 11.6 PS1 56244 2.6
J0849+2747 0.29854 53350 56628 6.9 6.9
J0909+4747 0.11694 52620 57745 12.6 12.6
J0937+2602 0.16219 54524 57369 6.7 PS1 55845 3.6
J1003+3525 0.11886 53389 57867 11.0 PS1 55726 5.2
J1104+0118 0.57514 52374 57867 9.6 PS1 55902 6.1
J1104+6343 0.16427 52370 54498 5.0 5.0
J1110−0003 0.21922 51984 57864 13.2   WISE 57003 11.3
J1115+0544 0.08995 52326 57393 12.7 WISE 57002 WISE 57367 0.9
J1118+3203 0.3651 53431 56367 5.9 5.9
J1132+0357 0.09089 52642 57392 11.9 CRTS 56665 1.8
J1150+3632 0.34004 53436 57422 8.1 8.1
J1152+3209 0.37432 53446 57844 8.8 PS1 56063 5.2
J1259+5515 0.19865 52707 57863 11.8 WISE 55534 WISE 56806 2.9
J1319+6753 0.16643 51988 57867 13.8 WISE 56982 11.7
J1358+4934 0.11592 53438 54553 2.7 2.7
J1447+2833 0.16344 53764 57071 7.8 7.8
J1533+0110 0.14268 51989 54561 6.2 6.2
J1545+2511 0.11696 53846 57891 9.9 9.9
J1550+4139 0.22014 52468 57864 12.1 PS1 56233 3.7
J1552+2737 0.08648 53498 56722 8.1 PS1 55987 1.9

Note. Δgphot and ${\rm{\Delta }}{(g-r)}_{\mathrm{phot}}$ are the g-band variability and g − r color variability from imaging data, while Δgspec and ${\rm{\Delta }}{(g-r)}_{\mathrm{spec}}$ are from spectrophotometry.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

The short transition timescale is not consistent with the scenario of variable obscuration (e.g., LaMassa et al. 2015; Gezari et al. 2017; Sheng et al. 2017). In a scenario of variable accretion rate, the CL timescale in this sample is much shorter than the inflow timescale of gas in the inner parts of the accretion disk, as discussed in previous works (LaMassa et al. 2015; MacLeod et al. 2016; Runnoe et al. 2016; Gezari et al. 2017). So modeling CL AGNs via changes in accretion rates is far from a settled matter. A detailed report on the mechanisms of the type transition will be presented in a subsequent paper.

6. Summary

We present surveys of CL AGNs in the SDSS spectra archive, the LAMOST spectra archive, and observations for some CL AGN candidates selected from photometric data. In total, we discover 21 new CL AGNs at 0.08 < z < 0.58. Among the new CL AGNs, 5 were found by repeat spectra from the SDSS, 10 were discovered from repeat spectra in SDSS and LAMOST, and 6 were selected from photometric variability and confirmed by new spectroscopy. From our surveys, approximately 0.006% (0.007%) galaxies with repeat spectroscopy in the SDSS (SDSS and LAMOST) are CL AGNs, with obvious broad Balmer emission-line changes.

The physical mechanism of type transition is important for understanding the evolution of AGNs. The mid-infrared flux changes with the optical continuum flux. Variations of more than 0.2 mag in the mid-infrared were detected in 15 CL AGNs during the transition, and such variability suggests ∼4.2 mag variability in the g-band. In the scenario of variable obscuration, the variation in the W1 band due to dust extinction yields a factor of ∼21 variability in the g-band. The optical variability is not consistent with the scenario of variable obscuration in the 10 CL AGNs in our sample at more than the 3σ confidence level and in 8 CL AGNs between the 1σ and 3σ confidence levels. Follow-up high-accuracy photometric data after the type transition can better constrain the mechanism of the type transition.

The optical and mid-infrared colors change with flux variation. A bluer-when-brighter chromatism is confirmed in the optical bands. However, the mid-infrared W1–W2 color is redder when brighter. The opposite color change trend in the mid-infrared is possibly caused by a stronger contribution from the AGN dust torus when the AGNs turn on. The mid-infrared variability and colors are good tracers for CL AGNs with intrinsic variability.

The upper limit of type transition timescales ranges from 0.9 to 12.6 years in the rest-frame. The mid-infrared emission of J1115+0544 increased for more than 1 mag in a short interval, less than one year in the rest-frame. The timescale of the type transition will help distinguish the mechanism of the changes. Follow-up photometric data are needed to distinguish the scenarios of AGN accretion rate variability and TDEs based on the decreasing light curve trend of TDEs (∼t−5/3).

The photometric variability of CL AGNs provides ways to select CL AGNs from large-area surveys. In the future, the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST; Ivezic et al. 2008), with multi-epoch and multi-band data, will provide powerful data for CL AGN selection and monitoring.

In future papers we will analyze the spectra and imaging data in more detail, and discuss their probable transition mechanism. The rareness of CL AGNs provides exceptional opportunities studies of the Mσ* relation at higher redshift with faint-state spectra and AGN-phase spectra. We plan to estimate their black hole masses from the Mσ* relation, and compare with their virial black hole masses obtained from the single-epoch spectra. The images of CL AGNs at faint states are useful for studies of AGN host galaxies and help to avoid contamination from the luminous central engines. We will perform a statistical study on the host galaxy properties of CL AGNs.

The work is supported by the the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFA0400703), National Key Basic Research Program of China 2014CB845700, the NSFC grant No.11373008 and No.11533001. We thank Luis Ho, Yue Shen, Arjun Dey, Nicholas Ross, Aaron Meisner, and Ning Jiang, Yanxia Xie for very helpful discussions. We thank Shu Wang for providing the extinction data.

We acknowledge the use of SDSS data. Funding for SDSS-III has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the National Science Foundation, and the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science. The SDSS-III website is http://www.sdss3.org/. SDSS-III is managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium for the Participating Institutions of the SDSS-III Collaboration including the University of Arizona, the Brazilian Participation Group, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Carnegie Mellon University, University of Florida, the French Participation Group, the German Participation Group, Harvard University, the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias, the Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group, Johns Hopkins University, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, New Mexico State University, New York University, Ohio State University, Pennsylvania State University, University of Portsmouth, Princeton University, the Spanish Participation Group, University of Tokyo, University of Utah, Vanderbilt University, University of Virginia, University of Washington, and Yale University.

We acknowledge the use of LAMOST data. The Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope (LAMOST, also named Guoshoujing Telescope) is a National Major Scientific Project built by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Funding for the project has been provided by the National Development and Reform Commission. LAMOST is operated and managed by the National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

This research has made use of PS1, DELS, WISE, CRTS, and PTF imaging data. The PS1 has been made possible through contributions by the Institute for Astronomy, the University of Hawaii, the Pan-STARRS Project Office, the Max-Planck Society and its participating institutes, the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Heidelberg and the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching, The Johns Hopkins University, Durham University, the University of Edinburgh, Queen's University Belfast, the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, the Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network Incorporated, the National Central University of Taiwan, the Space Telescope Science Institute, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under grant No. NNX08AR22G issued through the Planetary Science Division of the NASA Science Mission Directorate, the National Science Foundation under grant No. AST-1238877, the University of Maryland, and Eotvos Lorand University (ELTE). We acknowledge the use of the DESI Legacy imaging survey, whose website is http://legacysurvey.org. This research has made use of the NASA/ IPAC Infrared Science Archive, which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This publication makes use of data products from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, which is a joint project of the University of California, Los Angeles, and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The CSS survey is funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under grant No. NNG05GF22G issued through the Science Mission Directorate Near-Earth Objects Observations Programme. The CRTS survey is supported by the US National Science Foundation under grants AST-0909182 and AST-1313422. We acknowledge the use of PTF data; the PTF website is https://www.ptf.caltech.edu.

We acknowledge the use of the Xinglong 2.16 m telescope and the Palomar Hale 5 m telescope. This work has made use of the TOPCAT (Taylor 2005). We thank the Chinese Virtual Observatory; its website is http://www.china-vo.org.

Facilities: Sloan - Sloan Digital Sky Survey Telescope, PS1 - Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System Telescope #1 (Pan-STARRS), IRSA - , WISE - Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, Beijing:2.16 m (BFOSC) - Beijing Astronomical Observatory's 2.16 meter Telescope, Palomar P200/Caltech - .

Appendix:  

The light curves and spectra of the other 20 new CL AGNs, in addition to the CL AGN shown in Figure 1, are provided in Figure 5.

Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 5.

Figure 5. Same as Figure 1.

Standard image High-resolution image

Figure 6 shows some examples of CL candidates in the SDSS rejected by our visual inspection. Table 9 summarizes some details about the four CL candidates. They were were classified as "QSO" and "GALAXY" at different epochs in the SDSS. As shown in the residual spectra, there is no dramatic change. As the SDSS spectroscopic pipelines classify the objects through a comparison of individual spectra with galaxy, QSO, and stellar templates, these objects were classified as different types possibly due to marginally different spectral S/Ns at different epochs.

Figure 6.

Figure 6. Four CL candidates in the SDSS that were rejected by visual inspection. From low to high redshift, the four objects are J0001−0005 (left upper panel), J1356−0115 (right upper panel), J0803+4258 (left bottom panel), and J0937+3232 (right bottom panel). To show the spectra at different epochs, a constant is added to the spectra that were classified as "QSO."

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 9.  Examples of CL Candidates Rejected by Visual Inspection in the SDSS

Name R.A. Decl. Redshift Epoch(GALAXY) Epoch(QSO)
J0001−0005 00:01:07.52 −00:05:52.3 0.19754 55477 52943
J1356−0115 13:56:18.49 −01:15:14.0 0.24726 51942 52721
J0803+4258 08:03:47.55 +42:58:38.9 0.41881 55245 55178
J0937+3232 09:37:35.46 +32:32:49.9 0.76017 54807 56310

Note. Epoch(GALAXY) and Epoch(QSO) describe the MJDs of the spectra that were classified as "GALAXY" and "QSO," respectively.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

The spectra were classified by the LAMOST 1D pipeline into four primary classifications, namely "STAR," "GALAXY," "QSO," and "UNKNOWN," through matching individual spectra with templates (Luo et al. 2015). Among the 8171 objects, approximately 36% of them are classified as "UNKNOWN" and 7% are classified as "STAR." The S/N of objects classified as "UNKNOWN" is low due to unstable fiber efficiency, non-photometric observational conditions, or they are too faint for the LAMOST survey (Ai et al. 2016). None of the 10 CL AGNs from LAMOST were classified as "UNKNOWN" or "STAT." Figure 7 shows an example of CL candidates in the SDSS and LAMOST that were rejected by visual inspection. There is a break around 5700–5900 Å in the LAMOST spectrum due to inappropriate combination of the spectra in the blue and red arms, resulting in flux intensity variation in the automatic program check process.

Figure 7.

Figure 7. Example of CL candidates in SDSS and LAMOST that were rejected by visual inspection.

Standard image High-resolution image

Footnotes

  • IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatory, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA) under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.

Please wait… references are loading.
10.3847/1538-4357/aaca3a