This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.

The following article is Free article

Erratum: "On the Magnetic and Energy Characteristics of Homologous Jets From an Emerging Flux" (2016, ApJ, 833, 150)

, , , , , , , , , and

Published 2018 February 5 © 2018. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Jiajia Liu et al 2018 ApJ 853 201 DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa75a

Download Article PDF
DownloadArticle ePub

You need an eReader or compatible software to experience the benefits of the ePub3 file format.

This is a correction for 2016 ApJ 833 150

0004-637X/853/2/201

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

The authors realized it was not appropriate to estimate the Lorentz force using the nonlinear force-free field (NLFFF) extrapolation. Unfortunately, the uncorrected version was published before this was addressed. We wish readers to neglect any result related to the Lorentz force in the text and in Figure 3(e)in the original paper. The corrected version is shown as Figure 1 in this erratum. IOP Publishing sincerely regrets the errors. After the publication, the authors realized that in Table 1, Figure 7 and relevant text of the original paper, the estimated mass and energy of solar jets and their corresponding footpoint regions should be 3 orders of magnitude smaller. Figure 2 in this erratum is the corrected version of Figure 7 in the original paper. Other results keep unchanged.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. (a): Time-distance diagram of AIA 304 Å (red), 193 Å (green), and 335 Å (blue) passbands along the slit in Figure 2(b) of the original paper from 04:00 UT to 12:00 UT. (b): Normalized integrated intensities at 8 AIA passbands within the region confined by the blue dashed box in Figure 2(b) of the original paper. (c): Total negative magnetic flux (solid curve) integrating the HMI LOS magnetic field data within the blue dashed box Figure 1(e) of the original paper, and the millionth of the total unsigned line-of-sight magnetic flux for the entire active region (dashed curve). (d): Mean vertical current density (black solid curve) and mean current helicity (blue solid curve) within the same region as panel (c). (e): Total photospheric free magnetic energy (black solid curve) within the same region as panel (c). Shadows in panels (d) and (e) indicate corresponding errors.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 2.

Figure 2. (a)–(d): Jet mass, axial kinetic energy, thermal energy, and the footpoint region thermal energy vs. the total 131 Å intensity enhancement of the corresponding footpoint region, respectively. (e)–(f): Jet kinetic energy and thermal energy vs. the footpoint region thermal energy. Red symbols mark jets during the "SJ," blue before and green after the "SJ," with diamonds for the standard type and asterisks for the blow-out type. Black dashed lines are the linear fitting results.

Standard image High-resolution image
10.3847/1538-4357/aaa75a