This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.

Type II Supernova Spectral Diversity. I. Observations, Sample Characterization, and Spectral Line Evolution*

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and

Published 2017 November 21 © 2017. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Claudia P. Gutiérrez et al 2017 ApJ 850 89 DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8f52

Download Article PDF
DownloadArticle ePub

You need an eReader or compatible software to experience the benefits of the ePub3 file format.

0004-637X/850/1/89

Abstract

We present 888 visual-wavelength spectra of 122 nearby type II supernovae (SNe II) obtained between 1986 and 2009, and ranging between 3 and 363 days post-explosion. In this first paper, we outline our observations and data reduction techniques, together with a characterization based on the spectral diversity of SNe II. A statistical analysis of the spectral matching technique is discussed as an alternative to nondetection constraints for estimating SN explosion epochs. The time evolution of spectral lines is presented and analyzed in terms of how this differs for SNe of different photometric, spectral, and environmental properties: velocities, pseudo-equivalent widths, decline rates, magnitudes, time durations, and environment metallicity. Our sample displays a large range in ejecta expansion velocities, from ∼9600 to ∼1500 km s−1 at 50 days post-explosion with a median ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ value of 7300 km s−1. This is most likely explained through differing explosion energies. Significant diversity is also observed in the absolute strength of spectral lines, characterized through their pseudo-equivalent widths. This implies significant diversity in both temperature evolution (linked to progenitor radius) and progenitor metallicity between different SNe II. Around 60% of our sample shows an extra absorption component on the blue side of the ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ P-Cygni profile ("Cachito" feature) between 7 and 120 days since explosion. Studying the nature of Cachito, we conclude that these features at early times (before ∼35 days) are associated with Si ii $\lambda 6355$, while past the middle of the plateau phase they are related to high velocity (HV) features of hydrogen lines.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. Introduction

Supernovae (SNe) exhibiting prevalent Balmer lines in their spectra are known as Type II SNe (SNe II henceforth, Minkowski 1941). They are produced by the explosion of massive ($\gt 8$ ${M}_{\odot }$) stars, which have retained a significant part of their hydrogen envelope at the time of explosion. Red supergiant (RSG) stars have been found at the position of SN II explosion sites in pre-explosion images (e.g., Van Dyk et al. 2003; Smartt et al. 2004, 2009; Maund & Smartt 2005; Smartt 2015), suggesting that they are the direct progenitors of the vast majority of SNe II.

Initially, SNe II were classified according to the shape of the light curve: SNe with faster "linear" declining light curves were cataloged as SNe IIL, while SNe with a plateau (quasi-constant luminosity for a period of a few months) as SNe IIP (Barbon et al. 1979). Years later, two spectroscopic classes and one photometric were added within the SNe II group: SNe IIn and SNe IIb, and SN 1987A-like, respectively. SNe IIn show long-lasting narrow emission lines in their spectra (Schlegel 1990), attributed to interaction with the circumstellar medium (CSM), while SNe IIb are thought to be transitional objects, between SNe II and SNe Ib (Filippenko et al. 1993). On the other hand, the 1987A-like events, following the prototype of SN 1987A (e.g., Blanco et al. 1987; Menzies et al. 1987; Hamuy et al. 1988; Phillips et al. 1988; Suntzeff et al. 1988), are spectroscopically similar to the typical SNe II; however, their light curves display a peculiar long rise to maximum (∼100 days), which is consistent with a compact progenitor. The latter three subtypes (IIn, IIb, and 87A-like) are not included in the bulk of the analysis for this paper.

Although it has been shown that SNe II21 are a continuous single population (e.g., Anderson et al. 2014b; Sanders et al. 2015; Valenti et al. 2016), a large spectral and photometric diversity is observed. Pastorello et al. (2004) and Spiro et al. (2014) studied a sample of low luminosity SNe II. They show that these events present, in addition to low luminosities (MV ≥ −15.5 at peak), narrow spectral lines. Later, Inserra et al. (2013) analyzed a sample of moderately luminous SNe II, finding that these SNe, in contrast to the low luminosity events, are relatively bright at peak (MV ≤ −16.95).

In addition to these samples, many individual studies have been published showing spectral line identification, evolution, and parameters such as velocities and pseudo-equivalent widths (pEWs) for specific SNe. Examples of very well studied SNe include SN 1979C (e.g., Branch et al. 1981; Immler et al. 2005), SN 1980K (e.g., Buta 1982; Dwek 1983; Fesen et al. 1999), SN 1999em (e.g., Baron et al. 2000; Hamuy et al. 2001; Leonard et al. 2002b; Dessart & Hillier 2006), SN 1999gi (e.g., Leonard et al. 2002a), SN 2004et (e.g., Li et al. 2005; Sahu et al. 2006; Misra et al. 2007; Maguire et al. 2010), SN 2005cs (e.g., Pastorello et al. 2006; Dessart et al. 2008; Pastorello et al. 2009), and SN 2012aw (e.g., Bose et al. 2013; Dall'Ora et al. 2014; Jerkstrand et al. 2014). The first two SNe (1979C and 1980K) are the prototypes of fast declining SNe II (SNe IIL), together with unusually bright light curves and high ejecta velocities. On the other hand, the rest of the objects listed are generally referred to as SNe IIP, as they display relatively slowly declining light curves. For faint SNe, similar to SN 2005cs, the expansion velocity and luminosity are even lower, probably due to low energy explosions (see Pastorello et al. 2009).

In recent years, the number of studies of individual SNe II has continued to increase; however, there are still only a handful of statistical analyses of large samples (e.g., Patat et al. 1994; Arcavi et al. 2010; Anderson et al. 2014b; Faran et al. 2014b, 2014a; Gutiérrez et al. 2014; Pejcha & Prieto 2015a, 2015b; Sanders et al. 2015; Galbany et al. 2016; Müller et al. 2017; Valenti et al. 2016). Here we attempt to remedy this situation. The purpose of this paper is to present a statistical characterization of the optical spectra of SNe II, as well as an initial analysis of their spectral features. We have analyzed 888 spectra of 122 SNe II ranging between 3 and 363 days since explosion. We selected 11 features in the photospheric phase with the aim of understanding the overall evolution of visual-wavelength spectroscopy of SNe II with time.

The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we describe the data sample. The spectroscopic observations and data reduction techniques are presented in Section 3. In Section 4, the estimation of the explosion epoch is presented. In Section 5, we describe the sample properties, while in Section 6 we identify spectral features. The spectral measurements are presented in Section 7, while the line evolution analysis and the conclusions are in Sections 8 and 9, respectively.

In Paper II, we study the correlations between different spectral and photometric parameters, and try to understand these in terms of the diversity of the underlying physics of the explosions and their progenitors.

2. Data Sample

Our data set was obtained between 1986 and 2009 from a variety of different sources. This sample consists of 888 optical spectra of 122 SNe II,22 of which 4 were provided by the Cerro Tololo Supernova Survey (CTSS), 7 were obtained by the Calán/Tololo survey (CT, Hamuy et al. 1993, PI: Hamuy 1989–1993), 5 by the Supernova Optical and Infrared Survey (SOIRS, PI: Hamuy, 1999–2000), 31 by the Carnegie Type II Supernova Survey (CATS, PI: Hamuy, 2002–2003), and 75 by the Carnegie Supernova Project (CSP-I, Hamuy et al. 2006, 2004–2009). These follow-up campaigns concentrated on obtaining well-sampled and high-cadence light curves and spectral sequences of nearby SNe, based mainly on two criteria: (1) that the SN was brighter than V ∼ 17 mag at discovery and (2) that those discovered SNe were classified as being relatively young, i.e., less than one month from explosion.

The redshift distribution of our sample is shown in Figure 1. The figure shows that the majority of the sample has a redshift $\leqslant 0.03$. SN 2002ig has the highest redshift in the sample with a value of 0.077, while the nearest SN (SN 2008bk) has a redshift of 0.00076. The mean redshift value of the sample is 0.0179 and the median is 0.0152. The redshift information comes from the heliocentric recession velocity of each host galaxy as published in the NASA/IPAC extragalactic Database (NED).23 These NED values were compared with those obtained through the measurement of narrow emission lines observed within SN spectra and originating from host H ii regions. In cases of discrepancy between the two sources, we give priority to our spectral estimations. Two of our objects (SN 2006Y and SN 2007ld) occur in unknown host galaxies. Their redshifts were obtained from the Asiago supernova catalog24 and from the narrow emission lines within SN spectra originating from the underlying host galaxy, respectively. Table 1 lists the sample of SNe II selected for this work, their host galaxy information, and the campaign to which they belong.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Distribution of heliocentric redshifts for the 122 SN II in our sample.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 1.  SN II Sample

  Host Recession Hubble $E{(B-V)}_{\mathrm{MW}}$ Discovery Discovery Explosion N of  
SN Galaxy Velocity (km s−1) Type (mag) Date Reference Epoch Spectra Campaign
1986L NGC 1559 1305 SBcd 0.026 46711.1 IAUC 4260 46708.0a(3) 31 CTSS
1988A NGC 4579 1517 SABb 0.036 47179.0 IAUC 4533 47177.2a(2) 5 CTSS
1990E NGC 1035 1241 SAc 0.022 47937.7 IAUC 4965 47935.1a(3) 5 CTSS
1990K NGC 0150 1584 SBbc 0.013 48037.3 IAUC 5022 48001.5a(6) 9 CTSS
1991al 2MASX J19422191-5506275 4575b ? 0.054 48453.7 IAUC 5310 48442.5c(8)d 8 CT
1992af ESO 340-G038 5541 S 0.046 48802.8 IAUC 5554 48798.8c(8)d 5 CT
1992am MCG -01-04-039 14397b S 0.046 48829.8 IAUC 5570 48813.9c(6)d 2 CT
1992ba NGC 2082 1185 SABc 0.051 48896.2 IAUC 5625 48884.9c(7) 10 CT
1993A 2MASX J07391822-6203095 8790b ? 0.153 49004.6 IAUC 5693 48995.5a(9) 2 CT
1993K NGC 2223 2724 SBbc 0.056 49075.5 IAUC 5733 49065.5a(9) 17 CT
1993S 2MASX J22522390-4018432 9903 S 0.014 49133.7 IAUC 5812 49130.8c(5) 4 CT
1999br NGC 4900 960 SBc 0.021 51281.0 IAUC 7141 51276.7a(4) 8 SOIRS
1999ca NGC 3120 2793 Sc 0.096 51296.0 IAUC 7158 51277.5c(7)d 4 SOIRS
1999cr ESO 576-G034 6069b S/Irr 0.086 51249.7 IAUC 7210 51246.5c(4)d 5 SOIRS
1999eg IC 1861 6708 SA0 0.104 51455.5 IAUC 7275 51449.5c(6)d 2 SOIRS
1999em NGC 1637 717 SABc 0.036 51481.0 IAUC 7294 51476.5a(5) 12 SOIRS
2002ew NEAT J205430.50-000822.0 8975 ? 0.091 52510.8 IAUC 7964 52500.6a(10) 7 CATS
2002fa NEAT J205221.51 + 020841.9 17988 ? 0.088 52510.8 IAUC 7967 52502.5c(8)d 6 CATS
2002gd NGC 7537 2676 SAbc 0.059 52552.7 IAUC 7986 52551.5c(4)d 12 CATS
2002gw NGC 922 3084 SBcd 0.017 52560.7 IAUC 7995 52553.5c(8)d 11 CATS
2002hj NPM1G +04.0097 7080 ? 0.102 52568.0 IAUC 8006 52562.5a(7) 7 CATS
2002hx PGC 023727 9293 SBb 0.048 52589.7 IAUC 8015 52582.5a(9) 9 CATS
2002ig SDSS J013637.22 + 005524.9 23100e ? 0.034 52576.7 IAUC 8020 52570.5c(5)d 5 CATS
210 MCG +00-03-054 15420 ? 0.033 ?f ? 52486.5c(6)d 6 CATS
2003B NGC 1097 1272 SBb 0.024 52645.0 IAUC 8042 52613.5c(11)d 9 CATS
2003E MCG -4-12-004 4470b Sbc 0.043 52645.0 IAUC 8044 52629.5c(8)d 8 CATS
2003T UGC 4864 8373 SAab 0.028 52665.0 IAUC 8058 52654.5a(10) 6 CATS
2003bl NGC 5374 4377b SBbc 0.024 52701.0 IAUC 8086 52696.5c(4)d 8 CATS
2003bn 2MASX J10023529-2110531 3828 ? 0.057 52698.0 IAUC 8088 52694.5a(3) 12 CATS
2003ci UGC 6212 9111 Sb 0.053 52720.0 IAUC 8097 52711.5a(8) 7 CATS
2003cn IC 849 5433b SABcd 0.019 52728.0 IAUC 8101 52717.5c(4)d 5 CATS
2003cx NEAT J135706.53-170220.0 11100 ? 0.083 52730.0 IAUC 8105 52725.5c(5)d 6 CATS
2003dq MAPS-NGP O4320786358 13800 ? 0.016 52739.7 IAUC 8117 52731.5a(8) 3 CATS
2003ef NGC 4708 4440b SAab 0.041 52770.7 IAUC 8131 52757.5c(9)d 6 CATS
2003eg NGC 4727 4388b SABbc 0.046 52776.7 IAUC 8134 52764.5c(5)d 5 CATS
2003ej UGC 7820 5094 SABcd 0.017 52779.7 IAUC 8134 52775.5a(5) 3 CATS
2003fb UGC 11522 5262b Sbc 0.162 52796.0 IAUC 8143 52772.5c(10)d 4 CATS
2003gd M74 657 SAc 0.062 52803.2 IAUC 8150 52755.5c(9)d 3 CATS
2003hd MCG -04-05-010 11850 Sb 0.011 52861.0 IAUC 8179 52855.9c(5)d 9 CATS
2003hg NGC 7771 4281 SBa 0.065 52870.0 IAUC 8184 52865.5a(5) 5 CATS
2003hk NGC 1085 6795 SAbc 0.033 52871.6 CBET 41 52866.8c(4)d 4 CATS
2003hl NGC 772 2475 SAb 0.064 52872.0 IAUC 8184 52868.5a(5) 6 CATS
2003hn NGC 1448 1170 SAcd 0.013 52877.2 IAUC 8186 52866.5a(10) 9 CATS
2003ho ESO 235-G58 4314 SBcd 0.034 52851.9 IAUC 8186 52848.5c(7)d 5 CATS
2003ib MCG -04-48-15 7446 Sb 0.043 52898.7 IAUC 8201 52891.5a(8) 5 CATS
2003ip UGC 327 5403 Sbc 0.058 52913.7 IAUC 8214 52896.5c(4) 4 CATS
2003iq NGC 772 2475 SAb 0.064 52921.5 CBET 48 52919.5a(2) 5 CATS
2004dy IC 5090 9352 Sa 0.045 53242.5 IAUC 8395 53240.5a(2) 3 CSP
2004ej NGC 3095 2723 SBc 0.061 53258.5 CBET 78 53223.9c(9)d 9 CSP
2004er MCG -01-7-24 4411 SAc 0.023 53274.0 CBET 93 53271.8a(2) 10 CSP
2004fb ESO 340-G7 6100 S 0.056 53286.2 IAUC 8420 53258.6c(7)d 4 CSP
2004fc NGC 701 1831 SBc 0.023 53295.2 IAUC 8422 53293.5a(1) 10 CSP
2004fx MCG -02-14-3 2673 SBc 0.090 53307.0 IAUC 8431 53303.5a(4) 10 CSP
2005J NGC 4012 4183 Sb 0.025 53387.0 IAUC 8467 53379.8c(7)d 11 CSP
2005K NGC 2923 8204 ? 0.035 53386.0 IAUC 8468 53369.8c(8) 2 CSP
2005Z NGC 3363 5766 S 0.025 53402.0 IAUC 8476 53396.7a(6) 9 CSP
2005af NGC 4945 563 SBcd 0.156 53409.7 IAUC 8482 53320.8c(17)d 9 CSP
2005an ESO 506-G11 3206 S0 0.083 53432.7 CBET 113 53431.8c(6)d 7 CSP
2005dk IC 4882 4708 SBb 0.043 53604.0 IAUC 8586 53601.5c(6)d 7 CSP
2005dn NGC 6861 2829 SA0 0.048 53609.5 IAUC 8589 53602.6c(6)d 8 CSP
2005dt MCG -03-59-6 7695 SBb 0.025 53614.7 CBET 213 53605.6a(9) 1 CSP
2005dw MCG -05-52-49 5269 Sab 0.020 53612.7 CBET 219 53603.6a(9) 3 CSP
2005dx MCG -03-11-9 8012 S 0.021 53623.0 CBET 220 53611.8c(7)d 1 CSP
2005dz UGC 12717 5696 Scd 0.072 53623.7 CBET 222 53619.5a(4) 7 CSP
2005es MCG +01-59-79 11287 S 0.076 53643.7 IAUC 8608 53638.7a(5) 1 CSP
2005gz MCG -01-53-022 8518 SBbc 0.06 53654.7 IAUC 8616 53650.2a(5) 1 CSP
2005lw IC 672 7710 ? 0.043 53719.0 CBET 318 53716.8c(10) 14 CSP
2005me ESO 244-31 6726 SAc 0.022 53728.2 CBET 333 53717.9c(10)d 1 CSP
2006Y anon 10074e ? 0.115 53770.0 IAUC 8668 53766.5a(4) 13 CSP
2006ai ESO 005-G009 4571b SBcd 0.113 53784.0 CBET 406 53781.6c(5) 12 CSP
2006bc NGC 2397 1363 SABb 0.181 53819.1 CBET 446 53815.5a(4) 3 CSP
2006be IC 4582 2145 S 0.026 53819.0 CBET 449 53802.8c(9)d 4 CSP
2006bl MCG +02-40-9 9708 ? 0.045 53829.5 CBET 597 53822.7c(10)d 3 CSP
2006ee NGC 774 4620 S0 0.054 53966.0 cbet 597 53961.9a(4) 13 CSP
2006it NGC 6956 4650 SBb 0.087 54009.5 CBET 660 54006.5a(3) 6 CSP
2006iw 2MASX J23211915 + 0015329 9226 ? 0.044 54011.5 CBET 663 54010.7a(1) 5 CSP
2006ms NGC 6935 4543 SAa 0.031 54046.2 CBET 725 54028.5c(6)** 4 CSP
2006qr MCG -02-22-023 4350 SABbc 0.040 54070.0 CBET 766 54062.8a(7) 8 CSP
2007P ESO 566-G36 12224 Sa 0.036 54124.0 CBET 819 54118.7a(5) 6 CSP
2007U ESO 552-65 7791 S 0.046 54136.5 CBET 835 54133.6c(6)d 7 CSP
2007W NGC 5105 2902 SBc 0.045 54146.5 CBET 844 54130.8c(7)d 7 CSP
2007X ESO 385-G32 2837 SABc 0.060 54146.5 CBET 844 54143.5c(5) 12 CSP
2007Z PGC 016993 5277 Sbc 0.525 54148.7 CBET 847 54135.6c(5) 2 CSP
2007aa NGC 4030 1465 SAbc 0.023 54149.7 CBET 848 54126.7c(8)d 11 CSP
2007ab MCG -01-43-2 7056 SBbc 0.235 54150.7 CBET 851 54123.9c(10) 5 CSP
2007av NGC 3279 1394 Scd 0.032 54180.2 CBET 901 54173.8c(5)d 4 CSP
2007bf UGC 09121 5327 Sbc 0.018 54285.0 CBET 919 54191.5a(7) 4 CSP
2007hm SDSS J205755.65-072324.9 7540 ? 0.059 54343.7 CBET 1050 54336.6c(6)d 7 CSP
2007il IC 1704 6454 S 0.042 54354.0 CBET 1062 54349.8a(4) 12 CSP
2007it NGC 5530 1193 SAc 0.103 54357.5 CBET 1065 54348.5a(1) 11 CSP
2007ld anon 7499b ? 0.081 54379.5 CBET 1098 54376.5c(8)d 7 CSP
2007oc NGC 7418 1450 SABcd 0.014 54396.5 CBET 1114 54388.5a(3) 17 CSP
2007od UGC 12846 1734 Sm 0.032 54407.2 CBET 1116 54400.6c(5)d 14 CSP
2007sq MCG -03-23-5 4579 SAbc 0.183 54443.0 CBET 1170 54422.8c(6)d 7 CSP
2008F MCG -01-8-15 5506 SBa 0.044 54477.5 CBET 1207 54469.6c(6)d 2 CSP
2008H ESO 499- G 005 4287 SAc 0.057 54481.0 CBET 1210 54432.8c(8) 1 CSP
2008K ESO 504-G5 7997 Sb 0.035 54481.0 CBET 1211 54475.5c(6)d 12 CSP
2008M ESO 121-26 2267 SBc 0.040 54480.7 CBET 1214 54471.7a(9) 12 CSP
2008W MCG -03-22-7 5757 Sc 0.086 54502.7 CBET 1238 54483.8c(8)d 10 CSP
2008ag IC 4729 4439 SABbc 0.074 54499.5 CBET 1252 54477.9c(8)d 18 CSP
2008aw NGC 4939 3110 SAbc 0.036 54528.0 CBET 1279 54517.8a(10) 12 CSP
2008bh NGC 2642 4345 SBbc 0.020 54549.0 CBET 1311 54543.5a(5) 6 CSP
2008bk NGC 7793 227 SAd 0.017 54550.7 CBET 1315 54540.9c(8)d 26 CSP
2008bm CGCG 071-101 9563 Sc 0.023 54554.7 CBET 1320 54522.8c(6) 4 CSP
2008bp NGC 3095 2723 SBc 0.061 54558.7 CBET 1326 54551.7a(6) 5 CSP
2008br IC 2522 3019 SAcd 0.083 54564.2 CBET 1332 54555.7a(9) 4 CSP
2008bu ESO 586-G2 6630 S 0.376 54574.0 CBET 1341 54566.8c(7) 5 CSP
2008ga LCSB L0250N 4639 ? 0.582 54734.0 CBET 1526 54711.5c(7) 3 CSP
2008gi CGCG 415-004 7328 Sc 0.060 54752.0 CBET 1539 54742.7a(9) 6 CSP
2008gr IC 1579 6831 SBbc 0.012 54768.7 CBET 1557 54769.6c(6)d 5 CSP
2008hg IC 1720 5684 Sbc 0.016 54785.5 CBET 1571 54779.8a(5) 6 CSP
2008ho NGC 922 3082 SBcd 0.017 54796.5 CBET 1587 54792.7a(5) 3 CSP
2008if MCG -01-24-10 3440 Sb 0.029 54812.7 CBET 1619 54807.8a(5) 20 CSP
2008il ESO 355-G4 6276 SBb 0.015 54827.7 CBET 1634 54825.6a(3) 3 CSP
2008in NGC 4303 1566 SABbc 0.020 54827.2 CBET 1636 54825.4a(2)d 13 CSP
2009N NGC 4487 1034 SABcd 0.019 54856.3 CBET 1670 54846.8c(5) 13 CSP
2009W SDSS J162346.79 + 114423 5100 ? 0.065 54865.0 CBET 1683 54816.9c(9) 1 CSP
2009aj ESO 221- G 018 2883 Sa 0.130 54887.0 CBET 1704 54880.5a(7) 12 CSP
2009ao NGC 2939 3339 Sbc 0.034 54895.0 CBET 1711 54890.7a(4) 7 CSP
2009au ESO 443-21 2819 Scd 0.081 54902.0 CBET 1719 54897.5a(4) 10 CSP
2009bu NGC 7408 3494 SBc 0.022 54916.2 CBET 1740 54901.9c(8)d 6 CSP
2009bz UGC 9814 3231 Sdm 0.035 54920.0 CBET 1748 54915.8a(4) 5 CSP

Notes. Observing campaigns: CTSS = Cerro Tololo Supernova Survey; CT = Calán/Tololo Supernova Program; SOIRS = Supernova Optical and Infrared Survey; CATS = Carnegie Type II Supernova Survey; CSP = Carnegie Supernova Project.

In the first column, the SN name, followed by its host galaxy are listed. In column 3, we list the host galaxy heliocentric recession velocity. These are taken from the NASA Extragalactic Database (NED: http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/) unless indicated by a superscript (sources in table notes). In columns 4 and 5, we list the host galaxy morphological Hubble types (from NED) and the reddening due to dust in our Galaxy (Schlafly & Finkbeiner 2011) taken from NED. In columns 6, 7, and 8, we list the discovery date, their reference, and the explosion epochs. The number of spectra and the the observing campaign from which each SN was taken are given in columns 9 and 10, and acronyms are listed in the table notes.

aExplosion epoch estimation from SN nondetection. bMeasured using our own spectra. cExplosion epoch estimation through spectral matching. dCases where explosion epochs have changed between Anderson et al. (2014b) and the current work. eTaken from the Asiago supernova catalog: http://graspa.oapd.inaf.it/ (Barbon et al. 1999). fThe CATS survey performed the follow-up of SN 210, which was discovered by the SN Factory Wood-Vasey et al. (2004) and was never reported to the International Astronomical Union (IAU) to provide an official designation.

A machine-readable version of the table is available.

Download table as:  DataTypeset images: 1 2 3

From our SNe II sample, SNe IIn-, SNe IIb-, and SN 1987A-like events (SN 2006au and SN 2006V; Taddia et al. 2012) were excluded based on photometric information. Details of the SNe IIn sample can be found in Taddia et al. (2013), while those of the SNe IIb in Stritzinger et al. (2017) and Taddia et al. (2017). The photometry of our sample in the V band was published by Anderson et al. (2014b). More recently, Galbany et al. (2016) released the UBVRIz photometry of our sample obtained by CATS between 1986 and 2003. Around 750 spectra of ∼100 objects are published here for the first time. Now we briefly discuss each of the surveys providing SNe for our analysis.

2.1. The Cerro Tololo Supernova Survey

A total of four SNe II (SN 1986L, SN 1988A, SN 1990E, and SN 1990K) were extensively observed at CTIO by the Cerro Tololo SN program (PIs: Phillips and Suntzeff, 1986–2003). These SNe have been analyzed in previous works (e.g Schmidt et al. 1993; Turatto et al. 1993; Cappellaro et al. 1995; Hamuy 2001).

2.2. The Calán/Tololo Survey (CT)

The Calán/Tololo survey was a program of both discovery and follow-up of SNe. A total of 50 SNe were obtained between 1989 and 1993. The analysis of SNe Ia was published by Hamuy et al. (1996). Spectral and photometric details of six SNe II were presented by Hamuy (2001). In this analysis, we include these SNe II and an additional object, SN 1993K.

2.3. The Supernova Optical and Infrared Survey (SOIRS)

The Supernova Optical and Infrared Survey carried out a program to obtain optical and IR photometry and spectroscopy of nearby SNe ($z\lt 0.08$). In the course of 1999–2000, 20 SNe were observed, 6 of which are SNe II. Details of these SNe were published by Hamuy (2001, 2003), Hamuy et al. (2001), and Hamuy & Pinto (2002).

2.4. The Carnegie Type II Supernova Survey (CATS)

Between 2002 and 2003 the Carnegie Type II Supernova Survey observed 34 SNe II. While optical spectroscopy and photometry of these SNe II have been previously used to derive distances (Olivares 2008; Jones et al. 2009), the spectral observations have not been officially released until now.

2.5. The Carnegie Supernova Project I (CSP-I)

The Carnegie Supernova Project I (CSP-I) was a five-year follow-up program to obtain high quality optical and near-infrared light curves and optical spectroscopy. The data obtained by the CSP-I between 2004 and 2009 consist of ∼250 SNe of all types, of which 75 correspond to SNe II. The first SN Ia photometry data were published in Contreras et al. (2010), while their analysis was done by Folatelli et al. (2010). A second data release was provided by Stritzinger et al. (2011). A spectroscopy analysis of SNe Ia was published by Folatelli et al. (2013). Recently, Stritzinger et al. (2017) and Taddia et al. (2017) published the photometry data release of stripped-envelope supernovae. The CSP-I spectral data for SNe II are published here for the first time, while the complete optical and near-IR photometry will be published by C. Contreras et al. (2017, in preparation).

3. Observations and Data Reduction

In this section, we summarize our observations and the data reduction techniques. However, a detailed description of the CT methodology is presented in Hamuy et al. (1993), for the case of SOIRS the CT methodology is described in Hamuy et al. (2001), and for CSP-I it can be found in Hamuy et al. (2006) and Folatelli et al. (2013).

3.1. Observations

The data presented here were obtained with a large variety of instruments and telescopes, as shown in Table 6. The majority of the spectra were taken in long-slit spectroscopic mode with the slit placed along the parallactic angle. However, when the SN was located close to the host, it was necessary to pick a different and more convenient angle to avoid contamination from the host. The majority of our spectra cover the range of ∼3800 to ∼9500 Å. The observations were performed with the Cassegrain spectrographs at 1.5 m and 4.0 m telescopes at Cerro Tololo, with the Wide Field CCD Camera (WFCCD) at the 2.5 m du Pont Telescope, the Low Dispersion Survey Spectrograph (LDSS2; Allington-Smith et al. 1994) on the Magellan Clay 6.5 m telescope and the Inamori Magellan Areal Camera and Spectrograph (IMACS; Dressler et al. 2011) on the Magellan Baade 6.5 m telescope at Las Campanas Observatory. At La Silla, the observations were carried out with the ESO Multi-Mode Instrument (EMMI; Dekker et al. 1986) in medium resolution spectroscopy mode (at the NTT) and the ESO Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera (EFOSC; Buzzoni et al. 1984) at the NTT and 3.6 m telescopes. We also have three spectra for SN 2006ee obtained with the Boller & Chivens CCD spectrograph at the Hiltner 2.4 m Telescope of the MDM Observatory. Table 6 displays a complete journal of the 888 spectral observations, listing for each spectrum the UT and Julian dates, phases, wavelength range, FWHM resolution, exposure time, airmass, and the telescope and instrument used.

The distribution of the number of spectra per object for our sample is shown in Figure 2. Seven SNe (SN 1993A, SN 2005dt, SN 2005dx, SN 2005es, SN 2005gz, SN 2005me, and SN 2008H) only have one spectrum, while 90% of the sample have between 2 and 12 spectra. SN 1986L is the object with the most spectra (31), followed by SN 2008bk with 26. On average, we have 7 spectra per SN and a median of 6. There are 87 SNe II for which we have five or more spectra, 32 that have 10 or more, and 6 objects with over 15 spectra (SN 1986L, SN 1993K, SN 2007oc, SN 2008ag, SN 2008bk, and SN 2008if). In the current work, 4% of our obtained spectra are not used for analysis. 3% correspond to spectra with low S/N that does not allow for useful extraction of our defined parameters, while 1% are related with peculiarities in the spectra (see Section 5 for more details). Despite this, these spectra are still included in the data release and are noted in Table 6.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. Histogram of the number of spectra per SN. The distribution peaks at four spectra.

Standard image High-resolution image

3.2. Data Reduction

Spectral reduction was achieved in the same manner for all data, using IRAF and employing standard routines, including bias subtraction, flat-fielding correction, one-dimensional (1D) spectral extraction and sky subtraction, wavelength correction, and flux calibration. Telluric corrections have only been applied to data obtained after 2004 October.

In Appendix A (spectral series), we show plots with the spectral series for all SNe of our sample.

4. Explosion Epoch Estimations

Before discussing the properties of our sample, in this section, we outline our methods for estimating explosion epochs. The nondetection of SNe on prediscovery images with high cadence is the most accurate method for determining the explosion epoch for any given SN. Explosion epochs based on nondetections are set to the midpoint between SN discovery and nondetection. The representative uncertainty on this epoch is then (MJDdisc–MJDnon-det)/2. However, within our sample (and for many other current SN search campaigns) many SNe do not have such accurate constraints from this method due to the low cadence of the observations.

Over the last decade, several tools have been published, enabling explosion epoch estimations through matching of observed SN spectra to libraries of spectral templates. Programs such as the Supernova Identification (SNID) code (Blondin & Tonry 2007), the GEneric cLAssification TOol (Gelato; Harutyunyan et al. 2008), and superfit (Howell et al. 2005) allow the user to estimate the type of supernova and its epoch by providing an observed spectrum. All perform classifications by comparison using different methods. In our analysis, we used only the first two methods: SNID and Gelato. We find that Gelato gives a large percentage of their quality of fit to the Hα P-Cygni profile. However, based on our analysis (see Section 8), the most significant changes with time are observed in the blue part of the spectra (i.e., between 4000 and 6000 Å). Moreover, according to Gutiérrez et al. (2014), the ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ P-Cygni profile shows a wide diversity and there is no clear, consistent evolution with time. In addition, SNID provides the possibility of adding additional templates to improve the accuracy of explosion epoch determinations. We take advantage of this attribute in the following sections by adding new spectral templates, which aid in obtaining more accurate explosion epochs for our sample.

While for many SNe this spectral matching is required to obtain a reliable explosion epoch, a significant fraction of our sample does have an explosion epoch, constraining SN nondetections before discovery. In cases where the nondetection is $\lt 20$ days before discovery, we use that information to estimate our final values. In cases where this difference is larger than 20 days, we use the spectral matching technique. As a test of our methodology, for nondetection SNe, we also estimate explosion epochs using spectral matching to check the latter's validity (see below for more details).

4.1. SNID Implementation

To constrain the explosion epoch for our sample, we compare the first spectrum of each SN II with a library of spectral templates provided by SNID and then, we choose the best match. For each SN, we examined multiple matches, putting emphasis on the fit of the blue part of the spectrum between 4000 and 6000 Å. This region contains many spectral lines that display a somewhat consistent evolution with time, unlike the dominant Hα profile at redder wavelengths. Explosion epoch errors from this spectral matching are obtained by taking the standard deviation of several good matches of the observed spectrum of our selected object with those from the SNID library. Hα is the dominant feature in SN II spectra; however, its evolution and morphology varies greatly between SNe in a manner that does not aid in the spectral matching technique. We therefore ignore this wavelength region.

The red part of the spectrum can be ignored during spectral matching in a variety of ways: (1) using the SNID options; or (2) checking only the match in the blue part. For the former, SNID gives to the user the alternative to modify some parameters. In our case, we can constrain the wavelength range using wmin and wmax. Hence, the structure used is "snid wmin = 3500 wmax = 6000 spec.dat". For the latter, we just need to ignore visually the red part of the spectra and explore the matches obtained by SNID until we find a good fit in the blue part.25

From the SNID library, we use those template SNe that have well constrained explosion epochs, meaning SNe II with explosion epoch errors of less than five days (see Table 2). Specifically, we used SN 1999em (Leonard et al. 2002b), SN 1999gi (Leonard et al. 2002a), SN 2004et (Li et al. 2005), SN 2005cs (Pastorello et al. 2006), and SN 2006bp (Dessart et al. 2008). In the database of SNID, there are a total of 166 spectra. However, these templates do not provide a good coverage of the overall diversity of SNe II within our sample/the literature. Most of the SNe in the library are relatively "normal," with only one subluminous event (SN 2005cs). This means that any non-normal event within our sample will probably have poor constraints on its explosion epoch using these templates. For this reason, we decided to use some of our own well-observed SNe II to complement the SNID database.

Table 2.  Reference SNe II

SN Explosion Date V-maximum Date Days from Explosion to V-maximum References
1999em 2451475.6 (5) 2451485.5 5 Leonard et al. (2002b)
1999gi 2451518.3 (3) 2451530.0 12 Leonard et al. (2002a)
2004et 2453270.5 (3) 2453286.6 16 Li et al. (2005), Sahu et al. (2006)
2005cs 2453547.6 (1) 2453553.6 6 Pastorello et al. (2006)
2006bp 2453833.4 (1) 2453842.0 9 Dessart et al. (2008)
1988A 2447177.2 (2) This work
1990E 2447935.1 (3) This work
1999br 2451276.7 (4) This work
2003bn 2452694.5 (3) This work
2003iq 2452919.5 (2) This work
2004er 2453271.8 (2) This work
2004fc 2453293.5 (1) This work
2004fx 2453303.5 (4) This work
2005dz 2453619.5 (4) This work
2006bc 2453815.5 (4) This work
2006ee 2453961.9 (4) This work
2006it 2454006.5 (3) This work
2006iw 2454010.7 (1) This work
2006Y 2453766.5 (4) This work
2007il 2454349.8 (4) This work
2007it 2454348.5 (1) This work
2007oc 2454388.5 (3) This work
2008il 2454825.6 (3) This work
2008in 2454825.4 (2) This work
2009ao 2454890.7 (4) This work
2009au 2454897.5 (4) This work
2009bz 2454915.8 (4) This work

Note. Columns: (1) SN name; (2) Julian date of the explosion epoch; (3) Julian date of the V-band maximum; (4) days from Explosion to V-band maximum; (5) references.

The first five SNe are included in SNID and are used as templates in this work. Their respective references are presented in column 4. The rest of the SNe showed after the line are taken from this work as new SNID templates.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

4.2. New SNID Templates

We created a new set of spectral templates using our own SNe II nondetection limits. SNe II are included as new SNID templates if they have errors on explosion epochs (through nondetection constraints) of less than five days. Given this criterion, we included 22 SNe, which show significant spectral and photometric diversity. In this manner, the new SNID templates were constructed using ∼150 spectra and prepared using the logwave program included in the SNID packages. Adding our own template SNe to the SNID database, we can now use a total of 27 template SNe II to estimate the explosion epoch. Table 2 shows the explosion epoch and the maximum dates in V-band for the reference SNe, as well as the explosion epoch for our new templates. We note an important difference between our templates and previous ones in SNID: for the newer templates, epochs are labeled with respect to the explosion epoch, while for the older templates epochs are labeled with respect to maximum light (meaning that one then has to add the "rise time" to obtain the actual explosion date, see Table 2).

4.3. Explosion Epochs for the Current Sample

With the inclusion of these 22 SNe to SNID, we estimated the explosion epoch for our full sample. An example of the best match is shown in Figure 3. We can see that the first spectrum of SN 2003iq (October 16th) is best matched with SN 2006bp, SN 2004et, SN 1999em, and SN 2004fc 12, 13, 7, and 9 days from explosion, respectively. Taking the average, we conclude that the spectrum was obtained at 10 ± 7 days since the explosion. Table 1 shows the explosion epoch for each SN as well as the method employed to derive it, while Table 7 shows all the details of spectral matching and nondetection techniques. Appendix B (SNID matches) shows the plots with the best matches for each SN in our sample.

Figure 3.

Figure 3. Best spectral matching of SNe 2003iq using SNID. The plots show SN 2003iq compared with SN 2006bp, SN 2004et, SN 1999em, and SN 2004fc at 3, −3 and −3 and 9 days. As the first three SNe are included in the SNID database, they are in respect of the maximum, hence we have to add to them the days between the explosion and the V-band maximum (see Table 2) to obtain the explosion epoch. On the other hand, SN 2004fc (included in this work) is in respect of the explosion. Therefore, SN 2003iq has a good match with these SNe at 12, 13, 7, and 9 days from explosion, respectively. Taking the average, this means that this spectrum is at 10 ± 7 days from explosion.

Standard image High-resolution image

To check the validity of spectral matching, we compare the explosion epoch estimated with this technique and those with nondetections. These two estimations are displayed in Table 7. From the second to the seventh column, the spectral matching details are shown (spectrum date, best match found, days from maximum—from the SNID templates—days from explosion, average, and explosion date), while from eighth to tenth, those obtained from the nondetection (nondetection date, discovery date, and explosion date). The differences between both methods are presented in the last column. Such an analysis was previously performed by Anderson et al. (2014b), where good agreement was found. With the use of our new templates, we are able to improve the agreement between different explosion epoch constraining methods, thus justifying their inclusion. Figure 4 shows a comparison between both methods, where the mean absolute error between them diminishes from 4.2 (Anderson et al. 2014b) to 3.9 days. Also the mean offset decreases from 1.5 days in Anderson et al. (2014b) to 0.5 days in this work. Cases where explosion epochs have changed between Anderson et al. (2014b) and the current work are noted in Table 1. Nevertheless, although this method works well as a substitute for nondetections, exact constraints for any particular object are affected by any peculiarities inherent to the observed (or indeed template) SN. For example, differences in the color (and therefore temperature) evolution of events can mimic differences in time evolution, while progenitor metallicity differences can delay/hasten the onset of line formation. Further improvements of this technique can only be obtained by the inclusion of additional, well-observed SNe II in the future.

Figure 4.

Figure 4. Comparison between spectral matching and nondetection methods.

Standard image High-resolution image

5. Sample Properties

As mentioned in Section 2, we have 888 optical spectra of 122 SNe II; however, due to low signal-to-noise (S/N), we remove 26 spectra of 12 SNe for our analysis. We also remove nine spectra of SN 2005lw because they contain peculiarities that we expect are not intrinsic to the SN (most probably defects resulting from the observing procedure or data reduction). In total, we remove 35 spectra (∼4%). Figure 5 shows the epoch distribution of our spectra since explosion to 370 days. One can see the majority (86%) of the spectra were observed between 0 and 100 days since explosion, with a total of 738 spectra. Our earliest spectrum corresponds to SN 2008il at 3 ± 3 days and SN 2008gr at 3 ± 6 days from explosion, while the oldest spectrum is at 363 ± 9 days for SN 1993K. 53% of the spectra were taken prior to 50 days, 3.8% of which were observed before 10 days for 23 SNe. Between ∼30 and 84 days, there are 441 spectra of 114 SNe. There are 115 spectra older than 100 days and 27 older than 200 days, corresponding to 45 and 4 SNe, respectively. The average of spectra as a function of epoch from explosion is 60 days, while its median is 46 days.

Figure 5.

Figure 5. Distribution of the number of spectra as a function of epoch from explosion. The inset on the right shows the same distribution between 100 and 370 days.

Standard image High-resolution image

Figure 6 shows the epoch distribution of the first and last spectrum for each SN in our sample. The majority of SNe have their first spectra within 40 days from explosion. There are 31 SNe with their first spectra around 10 days (the peak of the distribution). On the other hand, the peak of the distribution of the last spectrum is around 100 days. Almost all SNe have their last spectra between 30 and 120 days, i.e., in the photospheric phase. There are 11 SNe with their last spectra occuring after 140 days, while only four SNe (SN 1993K, 2003B, SN 2007it, and SN 2008bk) have their last spectra in the nebular phase ($\geqslant 200$ days).

Figure 6.

Figure 6. Top: epoch from explosion of first spectrum. Bottom: epoch from explosion of last spectrum.

Standard image High-resolution image

The photometric behavior of our sample in terms of their plateau decline rate (s2; defined in Anderson et al. 2014b) in the V band is shown in Figure 7. For our sample of 117 SNe II, we measure s2 values ranging between −0.76 and 3.29 mag 100 day−1. Higher s2 values mean that the SN has a faster declining light curve. We can see a continuum in the s2 distribution, which shows that the majority of the SNe (83) have an s2 value between 0 and 2. There are eight objects with s2 values smaller than 0, while three SNe show a value larger than 3. The average of s2 in our sample is 1.20. We are unable to estimate the s2 value for five SNe, as there is insufficient information from their light curves. The s2 distribution for the 22 SNe II used as new templates in SNID is also shown in Figure 7. Although the diversity in the SNID templates increased with the inclusion of these SNe, the template distribution is still biased to low s2 values.

Figure 7.

Figure 7. Distribution of the plateau decline s2 in V band for 117 SNe of our sample. The blue histogram presents the distribution of "s2" in V band for 22 SNe II used as a new template in SNID.

Standard image High-resolution image

6. Spectral Line Identification

We identified 20 absorption features within our photospheric spectra, in the observed wavelength range of 3800 to 9500 Å. Their identification was performed using the Atomic Spectra Database26 and theoretical models (e.g., Dessart & Hillier 2005, 2006, 2011). Early spectra exhibit lines of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ $\lambda 6563$, Hβ $\lambda 4861$, ${{\rm{H}}}_{\gamma }$ $\lambda 4341$, ${{\rm{H}}}_{\delta }$ $\lambda 4102$, and He i $\lambda 5876$, with the latter disappearing at ∼20–25 days past explosion. An extra absorption component on the blue side of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ (hereafter "Cachito"27 ) is present in many SNe. That line has previously been attributed to the high velocity (HV) features of hydrogen or Si ii $\lambda 6533$. Figure 8 shows the main lines in early spectra of SNe II at 3 and 7 days from explosion. We can see that SN 2008il shows the Balmer lines and He i, while SN 2007X, in addition to these lines, also shows Cachito on the blue side of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$.

Figure 8.

Figure 8. Line identification in the early spectrum of SN 2008il (top) and SN 2007X (bottom).

Standard image High-resolution image

In Figure 9, we label the lines present in the spectra of SNe II during the photospheric phase at 31, 70, and 72 days from explosion. Later than ∼15 days, the iron-group lines start to appear and dominate the region between 4000 and 6000 Å. We can see Fe-group blends near $\lambda 4554$, and between 5200 and 5450 Å (where we refer to the latter as "Fe ii blend" throughout the rest of the text). Strong features such as Fe ii $\lambda 4924$, Fe ii $\lambda 5018$, Fe ii $\lambda 5169$, Sc ii/Fe ii $\lambda 5531$, the Sc ii multiplet $\lambda 5663$ (hereafter "Sc ii M"), Ba ii $\lambda 6142$, Sc ii $\lambda 6247$, O i $\lambda 7774$, O i $\lambda 9263$, and the Ca ii triplet $\lambda \lambda 8498,8662$ ($\lambda 8579$) are also present from ∼20 days to the end of the plateau. At 31 days, SN 2003hn shows all of these lines, except Ba ii, while at 70 and 72 days, SN 2003bn and SN 2007W show all of the lines. Unlike SN 2003bn, SN 2007W shows Cachito and the "Fe line forest."28 The Fe line forest is visible in a small fraction of SNe from 25–30 days (see the analysis in Section 8). As we can see, there are significant differences between two different SNe at almost the same epoch. Later, we analyze and discuss how these differences can be understood in terms of overall diversity of SN II properties.

Figure 9.

Figure 9. Line identification in the photospheric phase for SNe II 2003hn at 31 days (top), 2003bn at 70 days (middle), and 2007W at 72 days (bottom).

Standard image High-resolution image

In the nebular phase, later than 200 days post-explosion, the forbidden lines [Ca ii] $\lambda \lambda 7291,$ 7323, [O i] $\lambda \lambda 6300,$ 6364, and [Fe ii] $\lambda 7155$ emerge in the spectra. At this epoch, Hα, ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$, Na i D, the Ca ii triplet, O i, and the Fe-group lines between 4800 and 5500 Å, and 6000–6500 Å are also still present. Figure 10 shows a nebular spectrum of SN 2007it at 250 days from explosion.

Figure 10.

Figure 10. Line identification in the nebular spectrum of SN II 2007it at 250 days from explosion.

Standard image High-resolution image

6.1. The ${{H}}_{{\alpha }}$ P-Cygni Profile

${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ $\lambda 6563$ is the dominant spectral feature in SNe II. It is usually used to distinguish different SN types using the initial spectral observation. This line is present from explosion until nebular phases, showing, in the majority of cases, a P-Cygni profile. Although the P-Cygni profile has an absorption and emission component, SNe display a huge diversity in the absorption feature.

Gutiérrez et al. (2014) showed that SNe with little absorption of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ (smaller absorption to emission (a/e) values) appear to have higher velocities, faster declining light curves, and tend to be more luminous. Here we show that Hα displays a large range of velocities in the photospheric phase, from 9500 to 1500 km s−1 at 50 days (see the first two panels in Figure 11, which correspond to the ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ velocity derived from the FWHM of the emission component and from the minimum flux of the absorption, respectively).

Figure 11.

Figure 11. Distribution of the expansion ejecta velocities for 11 optical features at 50 days. The first two panels show the ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ velocity obtained from the FWHM and from the minimum absorption flux. From the third to the twelfth panel are presented the ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$, Fe ii $\lambda 5018$, Fe ii $\lambda 4924$, Fe ii $\lambda 5169$, Sc ii/Fe ii $\lambda 5531$, Sc ii $\lambda 5663$, Na i D $\lambda 5893$, Ba ii $\lambda 6142$, Sc ii $\lambda 6247$, and O i $\lambda 7774$ velocities obtained from the minimum absorption flux.

Standard image High-resolution image

The diversity of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ in the photospheric phase is also observed through the blueshift of the emission peak at early times (Dessart & Hillier 2008; Anderson et al. 2014a) and the boxy profile (Inserra et al. 2011, 2012). The former is associated with differing density distributions of the ejecta, while the latter with an interaction of the ejecta with a dense CSM. In the nebular phase this shift in ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ emission peak has been interpreted as evidence of dust production in the SN ejecta. Despite the fact that this is an important issue in SNe II, only a few studies (e.g., Sahu et al. 2006; Kotak et al. 2009; Fabbri et al. 2011) have focussed on these features.

In Figure 12, we show an example of the evolution of the ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ P-Cygni profile in SN 1992ba. We can see in early phases a normal profile, which evolves to a complicated profile around 65 days. Cachito on the blue side of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ is present from 65 to 183 days.

Figure 12.

Figure 12. Hα P-Cygni profile evolution in SN 1992ba. The epochs are labeled on the right.

Standard image High-resolution image

6.2. Hβ , ${{\rm{H}}}_{\gamma }$, and ${{H}}_{\delta }$ Absorption Features

Hβ $\lambda 4861$, ${{H}}_{\gamma }$ $\lambda 4341$, and ${{\rm{H}}}_{\delta }$ $\lambda 4102$ like ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ are present from the first epochs. In earlier phases, these lines show a P-Cygni profile; however, from ∼15 days the spectra only display the absorption component, giving space to Fe-group lines. The range of velocities of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$, ${{\rm{H}}}_{\gamma }$, and ${{\rm{H}}}_{\delta }$ at 50 days post-explosion vary from 8000 to 1000 km s−1 (see Figure 11).

Although ${{\rm{H}}}_{\delta }$ is a common line in SNe II, we do not include a detailed analysis of this line because in many cases the spectra are noisy in the blue part of the spectrum. Besides, like other lines in the blue, this line is blended with Fe-group lines later than 30 days.

Around 30 days from explosion ${{\rm{H}}}_{\gamma }$ starts to blend with other lines, such as Ti ii and Fe ii. Meanwhile, in a few SNe, the ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$ absorption feature is surrounded by the Fe line forest. Our later analysis shows that SNe displaying this behavior are generally dimmer and lower velocity events (see Section 8 for more details).

6.3. He i $\lambda 5876$ and Na i D $\lambda 5893$

He i $\lambda 5876$ is present in very early phases when the temperature of the ejecta is high enough to excite the ground state of helium. As the temperature decreases, the He i line starts to disappear due to low excitation of He i ions (around 15 days; Dessart & Hillier 2010; Roy et al. 2011). At ∼30 days, the Na i D $\lambda 5893$ absorption feature arises in the spectrum at a similar position where He i was located. This new line evolves with time to a strong P-Cygni profile, displaying velocities between 8000 and 1500 km s−1 at 50 days from explosion (Figure 11).

In many SNe II (or indeed SNe of all types), at these wavelengths one often observes narrow absorption features arising from slow-moving line-of-sight material from the interstellar medium, ISM (or possibly from circumstellar material, CSM). Such material can constrain the amount of foreground reddening suffered by SNe; however, we do not discuss this here.

6.4. Fe-group Lines

When the SN ejecta has cooled sufficiently, Fe ii features start to dominate SNe II spectra between 4000 and 6500 Å. The first line that appears is Fe ii $\lambda 5169$ on top of the emission component of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$. With time Fe ii $\lambda 5018$ and $\lambda 4924$ emerge between ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$ and Fe ii $\lambda 5169$. Fe ii $\lambda 5169$ becomes a Fe ii blend later than ∼30–40 days. At ∼50 days, the 4000–5500 Å region is completely filled with these lines and the continuum is diminished due to Fe ii line-blanketing. The ${{\rm{H}}}_{\gamma }$ and ${{\rm{H}}}_{\delta }$ absorption features are blended with Fe-group lines, such as Fe ii, Ti ii, Sc ii, and Sr ii. Between ∼5400 and 6500 Å other metal lines appear in the spectra. Lines such as Sc ii/Fe ii $\lambda 5531$, Sc ii M, Ba ii $\lambda 6142$, and Sc ii $\lambda 6247$ get stronger with time.

As we can see in Figure 11, the Fe-group lines show a range of velocities between 7000 and 500 km s−1 at 50 days. The peak of the distribution of the Fe ii group lines velocities is around 4000 km s−1. In the case of Ba ii, the peak is lower (around 3000 km s−1).

Although Fe ii lines always appear at late phases, few SNe show the iron line forest at 30 days. This feature appears earlier in low velocity/luminosity SNe (see Section 8).

6.5. The Ca ii NIR Triplet

The Ca ii NIR triplet is a strong feature in the spectra of SNe II. This line appears at ∼20–30 days as an absorption feature, but with time it starts to show an emission component. The Ca ii NIR triplet results in a blend of λ8498 and λ8542 in the bluer part and a distinct component, λ8662 on the red part. In SNe II with higher velocities these lines are blended producing a broad absorption and emission profile; however, in low velocity SNe, we see two absorption components and one emission in the red part. The velocities of the Ca ii NIR triplet range between 9000 and 1000 km s−1 at 50 days. In the nebular phase, the Ca ii NIR triplet is also present; however, at this epoch, it only exhibits the emission component.

Although in the majority of our spectra we cannot see Ca ii H and K $\lambda 3945$, due to the poor signal-to-noise in this region, this line is present in the photospheric phase of SNe II.

While the Ca ii NIR triplet is a prominent feature in SNe II, we do not include its analysis in the subsequent discussion, given that the overlap of lines makes a consistent comparison of velocities and pseudo-equivalent widths (pEWs) difficult.

6.6. O i Lines

The O i $\lambda \lambda 7772$, 7775 doublet (hereafter O i $\lambda 7774$) and O i $\lambda 9263$ are the oxygen lines in the optical spectra of SNe II. These lines are mainly driven by recombination and they appear when the temperature decreases sufficiently. The O i $\lambda 7774$ line is relatively strong and emerges around 20 days from explosion; however, in the majority of cases it is contaminated by the telluric A-band absorption (∼7600–7630 Å), which hinders detailed analysis. O i $\lambda 9263$ is weaker and appears one month later than O i $\lambda 7774$. These lines are present until the nebular phase and their expansion velocity at 50 days post-explosion goes from ∼7000 to 500 km s−1, as can be seen in Figure 11.

6.7. Cachito: Hydrogen High Velocity (HV) Features or the Si II λ6355 Line?

The extra absorption component on the blue side of the ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ P-Cygni profile, called here "Cachito," is seen in early phases in some SNe (e.g., SN 2005cs, Pastorello et al. 2006; SN 1999em, Baron et al. 2000) as well as in the plateau phase (e.g., SN 1999em, Leonard et al. 2002b SN 2007od, Inserra et al. 2011). However, its shape and strength is completely different in the two phases. Baron et al. (2000) assigned the term "complicated P-Cygni profile" to explain the presence of this component on the blue side of the Balmer series. They concluded that these features are due to velocity structures in the expanding ejecta of the SNe II. A few years later, Pooley et al. (2002) and Chugai et al. (2007) argued that this extra component might originate from ejecta—circumstellar (CS) interactions, while Pastorello et al. (2006) earmarked this feature as Si ii $\lambda 6355$.

In general, Cachito appears around 5–7 days between 6100 and 6300 Å, and disappears at ∼35 days after explosion. Later than 40 days, the Cachito feature emerges closer to ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ (between 6250 and 6450 Å) and it can be seen until 100–120 days. Figure 13 shows this component in SN 2007X. In early phases, this feature is marked with letter A and later with letter B. If attributed to ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ the derived velocities are 18,000 and 10,000 km s−1, respectively. A detailed analysis of this feature is presented in Section 8.4.

Figure 13.

Figure 13. Hα P-Cygni profile of the SN 2007X. The epochs are labeled on the right. The dashed lines indicate the velocities for the A and B features, which we call "Cachito."

Standard image High-resolution image

6.8. Nebular Features

As mentioned above, ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$, ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$, the Ca ii NIR triplet, Na iD, O i, and Fe ii are also present in the nebular phase (later than 200 days since explosion); however, in the case of the Ca ii NIR triplet, its appearance changes, passing from absorption and emission components to only emission components when the nebular phase starts. The rest of the lines have the same behavior but at much later epochs. The emergence of forbidden emission lines signifies that the spectrum is now forming in regions of low density. At this phase, the ejecta has become transparent, allowing us to peer into the inner layers of the rapidly expanding ejecta. Lines such as [Ca ii] $\lambda \lambda 7291,$ 7323, [O i] $\lambda \lambda 6300,$ 6364, and ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ are the strongest features visible in the spectra.

The [O i] doublet observed at nebular times is one of the most important diagnostic lines of the helium-core mass (Fransson & Chevalier 1987; Jerkstrand et al. 2012). Usually the doublet is blended; however, in SNe with low velocities these lines can be resolved (see, e.g., SN 2008bk). On the other hand, [Fe ii] $\lambda 7155$ is easily detectable, but in most cases it is blended with [Ca ii] $\lambda \lambda 7291,$ 7323, and He i $\lambda 7065$, which may hinder their analysis. In Figure 14, we can see the diversity found in the nebular spectra in our sample.

Figure 14.

Figure 14. Nebular spectra of seven different SNe of our sample. The spectra are organized according to epoch.

Standard image High-resolution image

7. Spectral Measurements

As discussed previously, SNe II spectra evolve from having a blue continuum with a few lines (Balmer series and He i) to redder spectra with many lines: Fe ii, Ca ii, Na i D, Sc ii, Ba ii, and O i. To analyze the spectral properties of SNe II, we measure the expansion velocities and pEWs of 11 features in the photospheric phase (see in Table 3 the features used), the ratio of absorption to emission (a/e) of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ P-Cygni profile before 120 days, and the velocity decline rate of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$.

Table 3.  Spectral Features Used for the Statistical Analysis in the Photospheric and Nebular Phases

Feature Name Rest Wavelengtha (Å) Blueward Limit Rangeb (Å) Redward Limit Rangeb (Å)
Hα 6563 6000–6300 6900–7100
Hβ 4861 4400–4700 4800–4900
Fe ii 4924 4800–4900 4900–4950
Fe ii 5018 4900–4500 5000–5050
Fe ii 5169 5000–5050 5100–5300
Na i 5893 5500–6000 5800–6000
Sc ii 5531 5400–5450 5500–5550
Sc ii/Fe ii 5663 5500–5550 5600–5700
Ba ii 6142 6000–6050 6100–6150
Sc ii 6247 6150–6170 6250–6270
O i 7774 7630–7650 7750–7780

Notes.

aThe rest wavelengths are weighted averages of the strongest spectral lines that give rise to each absorption feature. bThese limits are necessary in order to account for variations in spectral feature width and expansion velocity among SNe.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

7.1. Expansion Ejecta Velocities

The expansion velocities of the ejecta are commonly measured from the minimum flux of the absorption component of the P-Cygni line profile. Using the Doppler relativistic equation and the rest wavelength of each line, we can derive the velocity. To obtain the position of the minimum line flux (in wavelength), a Gaussian fitting was employed, which was performed with IRAF, using the splot package. As the absorption component presents a wide diversity (e.g., asymmetries, flat shape, extra absorption components), we repeat the process many times (changing the pseudo-continuum), and the mean of the measurements was taken as the minimum flux wavelength. As our measurement error, we take the standard deviation on the measurements. This error is added in quadrature to errors arising from the spectral resolution of our observations (measured in Å and converted to kilometers per second) and from peculiar velocities of host galaxies with respect to the Hubble flow (200 km s−1). This means that, in addition to the standard deviation error, which realizes the width of the line and S/N, we take into account the spectral resolution, which, in our case, is the most dominant parameter to determine the error.

The particular case of the ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ velocity was explored in Gutiérrez et al. (2014). Due to the difficulty of measuring the minimum flux in a few SNe with little or extremely weak absorption components, we derive the expansion velocity of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ using both the minimum flux of the absorption component and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the emission line.

In the case of O i λ 7774, where the telluric lines can affect our measurement of its absorption minimum, we only use SNe with a clear separation between the two features. This means that the number of SNe with O i measurements is significantly smaller (only 47 SNe) compared to the other measured features.

7.2. Velocity Decline Rate

To calculate the time derivative of the expansion velocity in SNe II, we select the ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$ absorption line. It is present from the early spectra, it is easy to identify and it is relatively isolated. To quantitatively analyze our sample, we introduce the Δv(Hβ) as the mean velocity decline rate in a fixed phase range [t0,t1]: ${\rm{\Delta }}{\text{}}v({{\rm{H}}}_{\beta })=\tfrac{{\rm{\Delta }}{v}_{\mathrm{abs}}}{{\rm{\Delta }}t}=\tfrac{{v}_{\mathrm{abs}}({t}_{1})-{v}_{\mathrm{abs}}({t}_{0})}{{t}_{1}-{t}_{0}}$.

This parameter was measured over the interval [+15, +30] d, [+15, +50] d, [+30, +50] d, [+30, +80] d, and [+50, +80] d.

7.3. Pseudo-equivalent Widths

To quantify the spectral properties of SNe II, another avenue for investigation is the measurement and characterization of spectral line pEWs. The prefix "pseudo" is used to indicate that the reference continuum level adopted does not represent the true underlying continuum level of the SN, given that in many regions the spectrum is formed from a superposition of many spectral lines. The pEW basically defines the strength of any given line (with respect to the pseudo-continuum) at any given time. The simplest and most often used method is to draw a straight line across the absorption feature to mimic the continuum flux. Figure 15 shows an example of this technique applied to SN 2003bn. We do not include analysis of spectral lines where it is difficult to define the continuum level, due to complicated line morphology, such as significant blending between lines. For example, later than 20–25 days, all absorption features bluer than ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$ are produced by blends of Fe-group lines plus other strong lines, such as Ca ii H & K and ${{\rm{H}}}_{\gamma }$. On the other hand, the Ca ii NIR triplet $\lambda \lambda 8498$, 8662 shows a profile that depends on the SN velocity (higher velocity SNe show a single broad absorption, while low velocity SNe show two absorption characteristics). These attributes make a consistent analysis between SNe difficult, and therefore we do not include this line in our analysis.

Figure 15.

Figure 15. Examples of pEWs used in this work for 11 features in the photospheric phase of SN 2003bn (at 70 days).

Standard image High-resolution image

We measure the ratio of absorption to emission (a/e) in ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ until 120 days. In the same way, the pEWs of the absorption lines are measured, we evaluate the pEWs for the emission in ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$, thus we have: $a/e=\tfrac{p\mathrm{EW}({H}_{\alpha (\mathrm{abs})})}{p\mathrm{EW}({H}_{\alpha (\mathrm{emis})})}$.

8. Line Evolution Analysis

Here we study the time of appearance of different lines within different SNe and make a comparison of those SNe with/without specific lines at different epochs. For all lines included in our analysis, we search for their presence in each observed spectrum. Then, at any given epoch, we obtain the percentage of SNe that display each line. This enables an analysis of the overall line evolution of our sample and whether the speed of this evolution changes between different SNe of different light curve, spectral, and environment (metallicity) characteristics.

In Figure 16 we show the percentage of SNe displaying specific spectral features as a function of time. As discussed previously, ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ and ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$ are permanently present in all the SNe II spectra from the first days, so we do not include them in the plot. We can see the following.

  • 1.  
    The feature located in the position of He i/Na i D is visible in all epochs; however, around 15–25 days, fewer SNe show the line with respect to either the earlier or later spectrum. We suggest that in this epoch the transition from He i to Na i D happens. Therefore, after 30 days, we refer to this line as Na i D. It is present in 96% of the spectra from ∼35 days. Later than 43 days, it is present in all spectra.
  • 2.  
    The Ca ii NIR triplet is present in 50% of the sample at ∼20 days. Before 20 days, it is present in ∼12% of the sample, while later than 25 days it is visible in almost all the sample, but with one exception at 38 days. The latter is SN 2009aj, which shows signs of CS interaction in the early phases.
  • 3.  
    ${{\rm{H}}}_{\gamma }$ blend with Fe-group lines starts at ∼20 days from explosion, growing dramatically at 35–45 days. Only one spectrum at ∼46 days does not show the blend (SN 2008bp).
  • 4.  
    The Fe-group lines start to appear at around 10 days (see Figure 16). The first line that emerges is Fe ii $\lambda 5169$. We can see that few SNe exhibit the absorption feature before 15 days; however, later at 15 days, around 50% of SNe show the line and at 30 days all objects have it. The next line that arises is Fe ii $\lambda 5018$. This line is seen from 15 days, being present in all SNe later than 40 days. Meanwhile, Fe ii $\lambda 4924$ is seen in one spectrum at 13 days (SN 2008br). From 30 days, it is visible in more than 50% of the spectra. The Sc ii/Fe ii $\lambda 5531$, Sc ii multiplet $\lambda 5668$, Ba ii $\lambda 6142$, and Sc ii $\lambda 6246$ are detectable later than 30 days. The emergence of the Sc ii/Fe ii $\lambda 5531$ and Sc ii multiplet $\lambda 5668$ happens at similar epochs, as well as Ba ii $\lambda 6142$ and Sc ii $\lambda 6246$.

Figure 16.

Figure 16. Appearance of different lines in SNe II between explosion and 100 days. Top: from the observed spectra. Bottom: from synthetic spectra (see more details in Table 5).

Standard image High-resolution image

In order to further understand the differences in line-strength evolution of SNe II, we separate the sample into those SNe that do/do not display a certain spectral feature at some specific epoch. We then investigate whether these different samples also display differences in their light curves and spectra. This is done by using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) test. Presented in Table 4 are all the results obtained with the KS test: SNe with/without a given line as a function of a/e and ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ velocity at ${t}_{\mathrm{tran}+10}$,29 Mmax, s2, and metallicity (derived from the ratio of Hα to [N ii] $\lambda 6583$, henceforth M13 N2 diagnostic; Marino et al. 2013) in a particular epoch. The values of the first four parameters can be found in Table 1 in Gutiérrez et al. (2014), while the metallicity information was obtained from Anderson et al. (2016). We find the following.

  • 1.  
    SNe II that never display the Fe ii line forest are distinctly different from those that do display the feature. Specifically, those that do show this feature have slow declining light curves (smaller s2), are dimmer, and are found to explode in higher metallicity regions within their hosts (see Table 4 for exact statistics).
  • 2.  
    There is less than a 2% probability that those SNe II, where the He i line is detected between 18 and 22 days post-explosion, arise from the same underlying parent population of a/e. This suggests that temperature differences between SNe II affect the morphology of the ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ feature.
  • 3.  
    Ba ii λ6142 and Sc ii λ6247 are both more likely to be detected at around 40 days post-explosion in dimmer SNe II, with only a  2% probability that the two populations (with and without these lines) are drawn from the same Mmax distribution.
  • 4.  
    Finally, when splitting the SNe II sample into those that do and do not display Sc ii/Fe ii $\lambda 5531$, Sc ii multiplet $\lambda 5668$, Ba ii λ6142, and Sc ii λ6247 at around 40 days post-explosion, we find that there is only around a 1% probability that the two samples are drawn from the same distribution of metallicity: those SNe that do not display these lines at this epoch are found to generally explode in regions of lower metallicity within their hosts.

Table 4.  KS-test Values

Feature name v(Hα) a/e Mmax s2 M13 N2 Epoch (days)
Fe ii line forest 5.19 9.80 2.17 3.73 × 10−4 4.38 0–100
Hγ blended 29.75 58.33 31.21 55.32 16.10 23–27
He i 5876 18.62 1.91 30.94 25.73 46.18 18–22
Ca ii IR triplet 87.73 91.97 94.47 53.30 98.82 18–22
Fe ii 4924 2.82 16.84 1.09 4.80 99.40 28–32
Fe ii 5018 15.68 90.80 99.02 68.84 61.53 18–22
Fe ii 5169 60.76 35.15 74.88 50.83 20.30 13–17
Fe ii multiplet 21.38 26.75 1.00 0.25 99.28 33–37
Sc ii/Fe ii 5531 75.60 89.60 30.34 45.20 1.84 38–42
Sc ii multiplet 5663 63.54 63.54 30.34 80.10 0.79 38–42
Ba ii 6142 45.75 83.58 1.90 57.43 1.29 38–42
Sc ii 6247 45.76 83.58 1.89 57.42 0.52 38–42

Note. Percentage obtained using a KS test to verify if two distributions (with and without each line) are drawn from the same parent population as a function of v(Hα), a/e, Mmax, s2, and M13 N2 in an particular epoch. This epoch is shown in the last column of the table. Values lower than 10% are presented in bold.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Figure 17 presents the cumulative distributions of the most significative findings obtained with the KS-test analysis.

Figure 17.

Figure 17. Cumulative distributions of each SN with/without different lines as a function of spectral and photometric and environment properties. First panel: SNe with/without Fe ii line forest between explosion and 100 days as a function of s2; second panel: SNe with/without Ba ii between 38 and 42 days as a function of Mmax; third panel: SNe with/without Sc ii between 38 and 42 days as a function of Mmax; fourth panel: SNe with/without He i between 18 and 22 days as a function of $a/e;$ fifth panel: SNe with/without Ba ii between 38 and 42 days as a function of M13 N2 diagnostic; sixth panel: SNe with/without Sc ii between 38 and 42 days as a function of M13 N2 diagnostic.

Standard image High-resolution image

This analysis was also performed with synthetic spectra for seven different models from Dessart et al. (2013). Four models (m15z2m3, m15z8m3, m15z8m3, and m15z4m2) show differences in the metallicity, while the rest of the properties are almost the same. The three remaining models have the same metallicity (solar metallicity); however, the other parameters are different: m15mlt1 has a bigger radius (twice times the radius of the two other models), m15mlt3 has higher kinetic energy, while m12mlt3 displays a smaller final progenitor mass and less kinetic energy (1/5 Ekin compared with the other models). More details are shown in Table 5.

Table 5.  Model properties

Model Z Mfinal R* Ekin
  (Z) (M) (R) (B)
m15z2m3 0.1 14.92 524 1.35
m15z8m3 0.4 14.76 611 1.27
m15z8m3 1.0 14.09 768 1.27
m15z4m2 2.0 12.60 804 1.24
m15mlt1 1.0 14.01 1107 1.24
m15mlt3 1.0 14.08 501 1.34
m12mlt3 1.0 10.50 500 0.25

Note. Summary of model properties used in this work.

Columns: (1) model name; (2) metallicity; (3) final progenitor mass; (4) progenitor radius; (5) kinetic energy.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

In general, the synthetic spectra show the same behavior (in relation to the appearance of the lines) as observed spectra. However, some differences are found, the majority of which are probably related with the low area of parameter space covered by the models that currently exist as compared to the parameter space covered by real events. The transition between He i to Na i D is more evident, and it happens between 18 and 40 days. Although the transition in the models is unambiguously identified by knowing the optical depth of specific lines, in these synthetic spectra, this happens a little bit later than in observed ones. This suggests that the temperature in specific models stays higher for a longer time than the average for observed SNe II. It is also likely that the observed SNe II span a smaller range in progenitor metallicity than the models (that go down to a tenth solar). The Na i D is visible in 100% of the sample after 50 days, only 5 days later than the observed spectra. Ca ii shows the same behavior in both synthetic and observed spectra; however, ${{\rm{H}}}_{\gamma }$ is blended in all of the sample later than 90 days, unlike the observed spectra that show it from 45 days. On the other hand, the Fe ii line forest is visible from 55 days, in contrast to the observed spectra that show this characteristic from 30 days. This behavior is only present in the spectra of the higher metallicity model (two times solar) and in the lower explosion energy model. The iron lines (Fe ii $\lambda 4924$, Fe ii $\lambda 5018$, Fe ii $\lambda 5169$, and the Fe ii blended) are present from ∼10 days. Fe ii $\lambda 5169$ is visible in 50% of the spectra at ∼15 days, while Fe ii $\lambda 4924$ is only visible in ∼10%. From 20 days, Fe ii $\lambda 5169$ is present in all the synthetic spectra, 10 days earlier than in the observed ones. The behavior of Fe ii $\lambda 5018$ is similar in both synthetic and observed spectra, whereas Fe ii $\lambda 4924$ starts faster in the models and it is visible in 85% of the spectra from 30 days. We can see differences in the Fe ii blend, which is visible in 100% of the sample from 50 days in the models; however, in the observed spectra that never happens. More differences are also appreciable between models and observation in Sc ii/Fe ii $\lambda 5531$, the Sc ii multiplet $\lambda 5668$, Ba ii $\lambda 6142$, and Sc ii $\lambda 6246$. These lines in models arise from 20 days, but in the observations it occurs from 38 to 40 days. Nevertheless, the evolution of the distribution is similar from 50 days. In conclusion, while in general the models produce a time evolution of spectral lines that is quite similar to the observations—supporting the robustness of the models—we observe small differences, suggesting a wider range of explosion and progenitor properties is required to explain the full diversity of observed SNe II.

8.1. Expansion Velocity Evolution

Figure 18 shows the velocity evolution of 11 spectral features as a function of time. The first two panels of the plot show the expansion velocity of the Hα feature: on the left, the velocity derived from the FWHM and on the right that derived from the minimum absorption flux. As we can see, the behavior is similar; however, the velocity obtained from the minimum absorption flux is offset between 10% and 20% to higher velocities. Figure 19 shows this shift at 50 days. Velocities obtained from the minimum absorption flux are higher around ∼1000 km s−1. However, it is possible to see few SNe (with higher ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ velocities) showing higher values from the FWHM. Using the Pearson correlation test, we find a weak correlation, with a value of $\rho =0.37$. SNe II with narrower emission components display a larger offset between the velocity from the FWHM and that from the minimum of the absorption. In contrast, those SNe II displaying the highest FWHM velocities present comparatively lower minimum absorption velocities. We note also the presence of two outliers (extreme cases, the lowest and highest value). Figure 11 shows the velocity distribution for the 11 features at 50 days post-explosion. We can see that ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ shows higher velocities than the other lines, followed by ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$. The lowest velocities are presented by the iron-group lines. In Figure 18, it is possible to see that the ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$ expansion velocity shows the typical evolution for a homologous expansion and like ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$, it is possible to see it from early phases. The iron lines display lower velocities than the Balmer lines. So, the highest velocity in SNe II is found in ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$, which implies that it is formed in the outer layers of the SN ejecta. Meanwhile, based on the lower velocities, the iron-group lines form in the inner part, closer to the photosphere. The O i line does not show a strong evolution. As we can see, its velocity evolution is almost flat.

Figure 18.

Figure 18. Expansion velocity evolution for ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ (from the FWHM of emission and the minimum flux absorption), Hβ, Fe ii $\lambda 4924$, Fe ii $\lambda 5018$, Fe ii $\lambda 5169$, Sc ii/Fe ii, Sc ii multiplet, Na i D, Ba ii, Sc ii, and O i from explosion to 120 days. The red solid line represents the mean velocity within each time bin, while the dashed red lines indicate the standard deviation. Table 8 presents these values.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 19.

Figure 19. Shifts of the ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ velocity obtained from the FWHM of the emission and from the minimum of the absorption at 50 days post-explosion.

Standard image High-resolution image

The lowest velocities are found in SN 2008bm, SN 2009aj, and SN 2009au. However, these SNe are distinct from the rest of the population. Unlike subluminous SNe II (such as SN 2008bk and SN 1999br)—that also display low expansion velocities—these events are relatively bright. They also show early signs of CS interactions, e.g., narrow emission lines. By contrast, SN 2007ab, SN 2008if, and SN 2005Z have the largest velocities.

8.2. Velocity Decline Rate of Hβ Analysis

The velocity decline rate of SNe II, denoted as Δv(Hβ), has not been previously analyzed. We estimate Δv(Hβ) in five different epochs (outlined above) to understand their behavior. We find that SNe with a higher decline rate at early times continue to show such behavior at later times. The median velocity decline rate for our sample between 15 and 30 days is 105 km ${{\rm{s}}}^{-1}$ day−1, while between 50 and 80 days is 29 km ${{\rm{s}}}^{-1}$ day−1. These results show an evident decrease in the velocity decline rate at two different intervals, which is consitent with homologous expansion.

8.3. pEWs Evolution

The temporal evolution of pEWs for each of the 11 spectral features is shown in Figure 20. In general, the pEWs increase quickly in the first one to two months then level off. The first two panels show the pEW evolution of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$. On the left is displayed the absorption, while on the right the emission component. The absorption component monotonically increases from 0, increasing to ∼100 Å; however, in a few SNe its evolution is different: from 70 days, the pEW decreases significantly. This behavior is observed in low and intermediate velocity SNe (e.g., SN 2003bl, SN 2006ee, SN 2007W, SN 2008bk, SN 2008in, and SN 2009N). Generally, these SNe show a very narrow ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ P-cygni profile, and at around 70 days from explosion Ba ii $\lambda 6497$ appears in the spectra as a dominant feature (see Roy et al. 2011; Lisakov et al. 2017 for more details). In Figure 21, we can see the ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ P-Cygni profile with the presence of Ba ii $\lambda 6497$, and the HV feature of hydrogen line (see Section 8.4 for more details) on the blue side of Ba ii.

Figure 20.

Figure 20. pEWs evolution for ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ absorption, ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ emission, Hβ, Fe ii $\lambda 4924$, Fe ii $\lambda 5018$, Fe ii $\lambda 5169$, Sc ii/Fe ii, Sc ii multiplet, Na i D, Ba ii, Sc ii, and O i from explosion to 120 days. The red solid line represents the mean pEW within each time bin, while the dashed red lines indicate the standard deviation. Table 9 presents these values.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 21.

Figure 21. Hα P-Cygni profile of low and intermediate velocity SNe II: 2003bl, 2006ee, 2007W, 2008bk, 2008in, and 2009N around 95 days post-explosion.

Standard image High-resolution image

Figure 20 also shows the ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ emission component evolution. An increment in the pEW in the majority of SNe is appreciable. There are a couple cases (e.g., SN 2006Y), displaying a quasi-constant evolution. The range of pEW of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ emission goes up 400 Å. In the case of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$, we can see that from 60 days there are few SNe with low pEW values, which show a quasi-constant evolution. SNe with this behavior are those that show the Fe ii line forest. The remaining SNe show an increase. The pEWs of iron-group lines grow with time; however, there is a group of SNe with pEW = 0. This indicates that some specific SNe do not have the line yet. For Sc ii/Fe ii, the Sc ii multiplet, Ba ii, and Sc ii, this is more obvious. On the other hand, the O i shows a quasi-constant behavior and Na i D shows a steady increase. Comparing the values, we can see that the absorption of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$, ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$, and Na i D have the highest values (from 0 to ∼120), while Fe ii $\lambda 4924$, Fe ii $\lambda 5018$, Sc ii/Fe ii, the Sc ii multiplet, Ba ii, Sc ii, and O i have the lowest ones (from 0 to ∼50).

The a/e evolution is displayed in Figure 22. One can see an increase until ∼60 days and then, the quantity remains constant or slightly decreases.

Figure 22.

Figure 22. Evolution of the ratio absorption to emission (a/e) of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ between explosion and 120 days.

Standard image High-resolution image

8.4. Cachito: Hydrogen HV Features or Si ii Line

The nature of Cachito has recently been studied. Its presence on the blue side of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ has given rise to multiple interpretations, such as HV features of hydrogen (e.g., Baron et al. 2000; Leonard et al. 2002b; Chugai et al. 2007; Inserra et al. 2011) or Si ii $\lambda 6355$ (e.g., Pastorello et al. 2006; Tomasella et al. 2013; Valenti et al. 2014). From our sample, 70 SNe show Cachito in the photospheric phase, between 7 and 120 days post-explosion; however, its behavior, shape, and evolution is different depending on the phase. To investigate the nature of Cachito, we examine the following possibilities.

  • 1.  
    If Cachito is produced by Si ii, its velocity should be similar to those presented by other metal lines.
  • 2.  
    If Cachito is related to HV features of hydrogen, its velocity should be almost the same as those obtained from ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ at early phases. In addition, if it is present, a counterpart should be visible on the blue side of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$.

Analyzing our sample, we can detect Cachito in 50 SNe at early phases (before 40 days). Because of the high temperatures at these epochs, the presence of Ba ii $\lambda 6497$ is discarded. Assuming that Cachito is produced by Si ii, we find that 60% of SNe present a good match with Fe ii $\lambda 5018$ and Fe ii $\lambda 5169$ velocities.30 Conversely, the rest of the sample shows velocities comparable to those measured at very early phases for ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$. Curiously, the Cachito shape is different between the two SN groups. In the former, the line is deeper and broader, while, in the latter, the line is shallow. In Figure 23, we present the velocity comparison for the former group, where a good agreement is found between Cachito, assumed as Si ii $\lambda 6355$ (blue), and the iron lines, Fe ii $\lambda 5018$ (green) and Fe ii $\lambda 5169$ (red).

Figure 23.

Figure 23. Velocity evolution of Cachito (blue) at early phases compared with Fe ii λ5018 (green) and Fe ii λ5169 (red).

Standard image High-resolution image

Later than 40 days, we detect Cachito in 43 SNe. Proceeding with the velocity comparison, we can discard its identification as Si ii or Ba ii $\lambda 6497$ (the latter, visible in few SNe from 60 days, see Figure 21), which suggests that Cachito is associated to hydrogen. During the plateau, it is possible to see Cachito as a shallow absorption feature only in ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ and/or as a narrow and deeper absorption on the blue side of both ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ and ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$ (see an example in Figure 24). According to Chugai et al. (2007), the interaction between the SN ejecta and the RSG wind should result in the emergence of these HV absorption features. They argue that the existence of a shallow absorption feature is the result of the enhanced excitation of the outer unshocked ejecta, which is visible on the blue side of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ (and He i λ10830). At early times, the ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$ Cachito feature is not predicted by Chugai et al. (2007), who argue that the optical depth is too low at the line-forming region. They also discuss that in addition to the HV shallow absorption, an HV notch is formed in the cool dense shell (CDS) located behind the reverse shock. Given the relatively high ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ optical depth of the CDS, a counterpart could be seen in ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$ as well. We found that 63% of the SNe with Cachito during the plateau show a counterpart in ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$ with the same velocity as that presented on ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$, which favors the interpretation as CS interaction. The HV notch of H i is found in 27 SNe; however, in the low velocity/luminosity SNe, it is only present in ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$. After 50 days, the blue part of the spectrum (<5000 Å) is dominated by metal lines, which may hinder its detection. Nonetheless, we argue that these can be HV H i because at least one low velocity/luminosity SN, SN 2006ee, shows a Cachito feature on the blue side of both Hα and Hβ, at around 50 days with consistent velocities. A summary of the analysis is displayed in Figure 25, where the ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ (red), HV ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ (blue), Hβ (cyan), and HV ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$ (green) velocity evolution is presented for 20 SNe.

Figure 24.

Figure 24. Spectral evolution of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ and ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$ lines of SN 2004fc. The dotted lines correspond to the HV features seen on the blue side of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ and ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$ from 50 to 120 days. We can see that the HV features show a velocity evolution from ∼9000 to ∼8000 km s−1.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 25.

Figure 25. Velocity evolution of Cachito in the plateau phase compared with the Balmer lines. In blue: HV of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$; in green: HV of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$; in red: the ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ velocity; and in cyan: the ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$ velocity.

Standard image High-resolution image

In addition to the 70 SNe where Cachito can be identified either with Si ii or HV features of H i, we find six SNe II that display Cachito at certain epochs; however, its exact properties do not align with the above interpretations (because of differences in shape and/or velocity). These are SN 2003bl, SN 2005an, SN 2007U, SN 2008br, SN 2002gd, and SN 2004fb. In summary, 59% of the full SNe sample show Cachito at some epoch, while 41% never show this feature. Soon after shock break-out, all SNe II have extremely high temperature ejecta. Therefore, if we were able to obtain spectral sequences shortly after explosion, the Si ii feature would always be observed. However, observationally, this is not the case because there are many SNe II within our sample without Si ii detections. This is simply an observational bias, due to the lack of data at very early times. Nevertheless, for SNe II that stay hotter for longer, the probability of detecting Si ii becomes larger. We therefore speculate that SNe II that have detected Si ii at early times have larger radii, which leads to a slower cooling of the ejecta and hence facilitates Si ii detection. Interestingly, when we split the sample into those SNe II that do and do not display the Si ii line, those where the line is detected are found to have lower a/e values, with only a 4% chance that the two populations are drawn from the same underlying distribution. This is also consistent with the previous finding that those SNe II with evident He i detections at around 20 days post-explosion are also found to have lower a/e values, suggesting that the value of a/e is related to ejecta temperature evolution.

In the case of those SNe II displaying Cachito consistent with HV features, these are most likely produced by the interaction of the SN ejecta with the RSG wind, where the exact shape and persistence of Cachito is related to the wind density Chugai et al. (2007). In Figure 26, one can observe the significant diversity in the different detection of Cachito.

Figure 26.

Figure 26. Cachito's shape according to its nature. Left panel: the Si ii line in SN 2007X. Middle panel: HV features of H i as a shallow absorption in SN 2008ag. Right panel: HV features of H i as narrow and deeper absorption component in SN 2003hl.

Standard image High-resolution image

9. Conclusions

In this paper, we have presented optical spectra of 122 nearby SNe II observed between 1986 and 2009. A total of 888 spectra ranging between 3 and 363 days post-explosion have been analyzed. The spectral matching technique was discussed as an alternative to nondetection constraints for estimating SN explosion epochs.

In order to quantify the spectral diversity, we analyze the appearance of the photospheric lines and their time evolution in terms of the a/e and ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ velocity at the B-band transition time plus 10 days (ttran+10; see Gutiérrez et al. 2014 for more details), the magnitude at maximum (Mmax), the plateau decline (s2), and metallicity (M13 N2). We analyzed the velocity decline rate of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$, the a/e evolution, the expansion ejecta velocities, and the pEWs for 11 features: ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$, ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$, He i/Na i D, Fe ii $\lambda 4924$, Fe ii $\lambda 5018$, Fe ii $\lambda 5169$, Fe ii blend, Sc ii/Fe ii, Sc ii multiplet, Ba ii, Sc ii, and O i. We find a large range in velocities and pEWs, which may be related with a diversity in the explosion energy, radius of the progenitor, and metallicity. The evolution of line strengths was analyzed and compared to that of spectral models. SNe II displaying differences in spectral line evolution were also found to have other different spectral, photometric, and environmental properties. Finally, we discuss the detection and origin of Cachito on the blue side of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$.

The main results obtained with our analysis are summarized as follows.

  • 1.  
    The line evolution indicates differences in temperatures and/or metallicity. Thus, SNe with slower temperature gradients show the appearance of the iron lines later, while SNe in environments with higher metallicities show them earlier. In fact, the Fe ii line forest is present in faint SNe with low ejecta temperatures and/or in high metallicity environments. Comparing this result with the synthetic spectra, we find that indeed this feature is only present in higher metallicity (two times solar) and lower explosion energy models, which is consistent with our observations.
  • 2.  
    SNe II display a significant variety of expansion velocities, suggesting a large range in explosion energies.
  • 3.  
    At early phases (before 25 days), SNe II with a weak ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ absorption component show He i $\lambda 5876$ and the Si ii $\lambda 6355$ features. We speculate that this occurs because of higher temperatures at these epochs.
  • 4.  
    Around 60% of our SNe II show the Cachito feature between 7 and 120 days since explosion. When Cachito is detected less than 30 days post-explosion, then it is identified with Si ii. The epochs of early detection can thus inform us of the temperature evolution: SNe II with Si ii detections at later epochs have higher temperatures, and this may be related to higher-radius progenitors. At later epochs, during the recombination phase, we suggest that Cachito is related to HV of hydrogen lines. Such HV features are most likely related to the interaction of the SN ejecta with the RSG wind.

All data analyzed in this work are available on http://csp.obs.carnegiescience.edu/, as well as the additional SNID templates (22 SNe), for the SNe II comparison.

C.P.G. and S.G.G. acknowledge support by projects IC120009 "Millennium Institute of Astrophysics (MAS)" and P10-064-F "Millennium Center for Supernova Science" of the Iniciativa Cientfica Milenio del Ministerio Economa, Fomento y Turismo de Chile. C.P.G. acknowledges support from EU/FP7-ERC grant No. [615929]. M.D.S. is supported by the Danish Agency for Science and Technology and Innovation realized through a Sapere Aude Level 2 grant and by a research grant (13261) from the VILLUM FONDEN. We gratefully acknowledge support of the CSP by the NSF under grants AST0306969, AST0908886, AST0607438, AST1008343, AST-1613472, AST-1613426, and AST-1613455. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED), which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

Appendix A: Additional Table

Appendix A presents additional information related to the observations and the analysis of our sample. Table 6 lists the spectroscopic observation information, Table 7 presents the explosion epoch estimation comparison, and Tables 8 and 9 present the mean velocity and mean pEW values, respectively.

Table 6.  Spectroscopic Observation Information

UT Date JD Phase Tel. Inst. Wavelength Resol. Exp. Air-
    (days)     Range (AA) (AA) (s) mass
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)
SN 1986L
1986 Oct 09 2446712.50 4 3681–7728 1000 1.21
1986 Oct 11 2446714.50 6 3730–7168 1556 1.20
1986 Oct 12 2446715.50 7 3800–7322 2000 1.21
1986 Oct 13 2446716.50 8 3681–4988 1352 1.21a
1986 Oct 14 2446717.50 9 3681–4988 2500 1.19a
1986 Oct 15 2446718.50 10 3681–4988 2500 1.18a
1986 Oct 20 2446723.50 15 3720–5031 3000 1.24a
1986 Oct 26 2446729.50 21 3830–7330 2000 1.20
1986 Oct 28 2446731.50 23 3596–5125 2000 1.37
1986 Oct 28 2446731.50 23 3590–5130 1.37
1986 Oct 29 2446732.50 24 3675–5240 1200 1.23
1986 Nov 01 2446735.50 27 3270–7205 1800 1.21
1986 Nov 02 2446736.50 28 3270–7205 1200 1.2
1986 Nov 03 2446737.50 29 3847–7357 2000 1.22
1986 Nov 03 2446737.50 29 3270–7205 1200 1.21
1986 Nov 04 2446738.50 30 4166–7701 1800 1.22
1986 Nov 04 2446738.50 30 3270–7205 1200 1.20
1986 Nov 05 2446739.50 31 3270–7205 1200 1.20
1986 Nov 06 2446740.50 32 3270–7205 1200 1.21
1986 Nov 07 2446741.50 33 3270–7205 1200 1.21
1986 Nov 10 2446744.50 36 4166–7701 1800 1.23
1986 Nov 11 2446745.50 37 3830–7285 1000 1.19
1986 Nov 14 2446748.50 40 3561–6446 1.20
1986 Nov 16 2446750.50 42 3561–6446 1.18
1986 Nov 25 2446759.50 51 3450–6950 2000 1.20a
1986 Dec 09 2446773.50 65 3680–6670 1000 1.44
1986 Dec 10 2446774.50 66 3769–7329 2262
1986 Dec 23 2446787.50 79 3991–7548 2394
1987 Jan 01 2446796.50 88 3776–7578 2545
1987 Jan 23 2446818.50 110 3450–6950 3000 1.20
1987 Jan 30 2446825.50 117 5601–7998 1.24

Notes.

Note that up to 1999, we do not have access to the telescope, intrument, and resolution information. Between 2002 and 2003, the resolution information is not available.

Columns: (1) UT date of the observation; (2) Julian date of the observation; (3) phase in days since explosion; (4) telescope code 3P6: ESO 3.6 m Telescope; BAA: Las Campanas Magellan I 6.5 m Baade Telescope; CLA: Las Campanas Magellan II 6.5 m Clay Telescope; DUP: Las Campanas 2.5 m du Pont Telescope Telescope; NTT: New Technology Telescope; (5) instrument code BC: Boller & Chivens spectrograph; EF: ESO Faint Object Spectrograph and Camera (EFOSC-2); EM: ESO Multi-Mode Instrument (EMMI); IM: Inamori Magellan Areal Camera and Spectrograph (IMACS), LD: Low Dispersion Survey Spectrograph (LDSS); WF: Wide Field Reimaging CCD Camera (WFCCD); (6) wavelength range covered; (7) spectral resolution in Å as estimated from arc-lamp lines; (8) total exposure time; (9) airmass at the middle of the observation.

aSpectra with low S/N. bSpectra with defects resulting from the observing procedure or data reduction.

Only a portion of this table is shown here to demonstrate its form and content. A machine-readable version of the full table is available.

Download table as:  DataTypeset image

Table 7.  Explosion Epoch Estimation Comparison

SN Spect. Date Best Match Days from Days from Average Explosion Date Nondetection Date Discovery Date Explosion Date Difference
  JD   Maximum Explosion (Using Match) (MJD) (MJD) (MJD) (MJD) (days)
 
1968L 46715.5 2006bp −2 7 7 46708.5 (5) 46705.5 46710.5 46708.0 (3) 0
    1999em −4 6            
                     
1988A 47188.5 1999em +5 15 17 47171.5 (6) 47175.5 47179.0 47177.2 (2) −6
    2006bp +7 16            
    2004et +4 20            
                     
1990E 47945.5 1999em −3 7 9 47936.5 (6) 47932.5 47937.7 47935.1 (3) 1
    2004et −3 13            
    1999gi −4 8            
    2006bp 0 9            
                     
1990K 48049.5 2004et +33 49 48 48001.5 (6) 48037.3
    2006bp +49 58            
    1999em +27 37            
                     
1991al 48473.5 2006bp +25 34 31 48442.5 (8) 48453.7
    2004et +20 36            
    1999em +16 26            
    2003iq 29            
                     
1992af 48832.8 2003bn 35 34 48798.8 (8) 48802.8
    2007il 45            
    1999gi +19 31            
    2006bp +20 29            
    2003iq 29            
    2004et +20 36            
                     

Note.

Columns: (1) SN name; (2) reduced Julian date of the spectrum used to the match (JD 2,400,000); (3) best match obtained with SNID; (4) days from maximum of the template used to the match; (5) days from explosion of the template used to the match; (6) average obtained from the days from explosion; (7) explosion date obtained with the matching technique; (8) nondetection date of the SN; (9) discovery date of the SN; (10) explosion date obtained from nondetection and discovery date; (11) difference in days between the explosion date from matching technique and nondetection.

Only a portion of this table is shown here to demonstrate its form and content. A machine-readable version of the full table is available.

Download table as:  DataTypeset image

Table 8.  Mean Velocity Values and the Standard Deviation for Our Sample

Epoch ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$ Fe ii λ4924 Fe ii λ5018 Fe ii λ5169 Fe ii/Sc ii Sc ii Mult. Na i D Ba ii Sc ii O i
(Days) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1)
4 8369 ± 3930 12845 ± 950 11379 ± 1800
8.6 9399 ± 3564 10702 ± 1382 9605 ± 1574 10447 ± 1050
12.8 9384 ± 2240 9468 ± 1787 8748 ± 1653 3187 ± 281 5298 ± 1791 6871 ± 2234 3280 ± 1680
18.1 9044 ± 1576 8987 ± 1430 8364 ± 1478 3183 ± 796 6237 ± 1117 6300 ± 1174 4888 ± 2762
23.1 7191 ± 2027 7798 ± 1966 7083 ± 1690 3882 ± 1025 5241 ± 1328 5274 ± 1254 5057 ± 1995 5426 ± 1612 5539 ± 3200 5076 ± 420 3951 ± 1396
27.7 7728 ± 1606 8369 ± 1825 7426 ± 1527 4193 ± 1499 5506 ± 1229 5440 ± 1098 6033 ± 2276 5747 ± 1826 4984 ± 2790 4537 ± 2678 4961 ± 1900
33.1 7319 ± 1190 7745 ± 1194 6668 ± 1260 4240 ± 1139 4974 ± 1114 4942 ± 892 5085 ± 1307 4832 ± 1267 5865 ± 2029 4521 ± 1595 4504 ± 1323 4908 ± 1586
38.1 6815 ± 1563 7478 ± 1548 6297 ± 1582 4135 ± 1346 4641 ± 1324 4428 ± 1065 4835 ± 1458 4427 ± 1181 5479 ± 1977 3979 ± 1513 3837 ± 1301 4274 ± 1737
42.8 6188 ± 1807 6551 ± 1745 5267 ± 1600 3544 ± 1158 3857 ± 1097 3760 ± 1045 3969 ± 1188 3739 ± 968 4411 ± 1596 3164 ± 1367 3621 ± 1238 3587 ± 1605
47.8 6616 ± 1864 7145 ± 1772 5541 ± 1688 3493 ± 1130 4049 ± 1181 3938 ± 990 4243 ± 1035 3956 ± 899 4952 ± 1634 3712 ± 1165 3747 ± 888 4090 ± 947
53.1 5975 ± 1457 6535 ± 1755 5004 ± 1785 3307 ± 1027 3654 ± 1135 3537 ± 851 3888 ± 1181 3507 ± 978 4408 ± 1531 3258 ± 1258 3227 ± 1146 3520 ± 1690
58.6 5907 ± 1883 6615 ± 1900 5025 ± 1774 3086 ± 924 3682 ± 1358 3631 ± 973 3803 ± 1371 3552 ± 935 4491 ± 1467 3047 ± 815 3092 ± 638 2861 ± 1099
63.3 5836 ± 1597 6619 ± 1565 4836 ± 1548 3074 ± 919 3455 ± 1093 3401 ± 758 3553 ± 1073 3294 ± 918 4284 ± 1213 3062 ± 735 3145 ± 898 2919 ± 1077
68 5556 ± 1053 6613 ± 1038 4909 ± 1146 2963 ± 464 3378 ± 722 3397 ± 639 3342 ± 609 3099 ± 752 4359 ± 1098 2785 ± 581 2843 ± 593 2786 ± 1095
72.8 5473 ± 1496 6720 ± 1564 4725 ± 1665 2875 ± 936 3203 ± 952 3374 ± 828 3352 ± 1315 3074 ± 935 4296 ± 1426 3004 ± 1123 2738 ± 813 3091 ± 1631
78.2 5037 ± 1706 6061 ± 1660 4460 ± 1553 2685 ± 784 2980 ± 778 3078 ± 820 2981 ± 852 2841 ± 850 4229 ± 1344 2792 ± 877 2607 ± 668 2682 ± 1109
83.5 5687 ± 1722 6490 ± 1883 4386 ± 1492 2679 ± 929 2863 ± 1000 3074 ± 919 2686 ± 861 2734 ± 700 4240 ± 1156 2564 ± 776 2428 ± 773 2232 ± 424
87.5 4871 ± 1664 6197 ± 1930 4448 ± 1514 2732 ± 807 3217 ± 937 3253 ± 785 3041 ± 855 2679 ± 532 4335 ± 1062 2735 ± 724 2517 ± 722 2986 ± 16344
93.3 4627 ± 1541 5666 ± 2016 4261 ± 1493 2555 ± 372 2841 ± 811 2946 ± 718 2607 ± 610 2478 ± 596 4200 ± 1059 2484 ± 554 2256 ± 398 2493 ± 12364
98.2 4349 ± 1602 5788 ± 2073 4372 ± 1505 2122 ± 550 2498 ± 603 2476 ± 631 2276 ± 644 2069 ± 629 4203 ± 971 2139 ± 501 1929 ± 580 1655 ± 950
103 3466 ± 836 4422 ± 1353 3014 ± 993 2067 ± 593 2141 ± 393 2119 ± 525 1844 ± 471 1864 ± 334 3445 ± 915 101 ± 506 1514 ± 124 1335 ± 321
108.2 4114 ± 836 5625 ± 1226 4128 ± 885 2128 ± 594 2430 ± 346 2625 ± 457 2531 ± 344 2278 ± 242 4073 ± 388 274 ± 259 2161 ± 249 1833 ± 1555
115.7 4927 ± 1763 5805 ± 1176 4536 ± 1025 2667 ± 484 2623 ± 725 2451 ± 679 2170 ± 1860 1748 ± 210 4793 ± 722 100 ± 108 1441 ± 220 1823 ± 1160

Note. Columns: (1) epoch; (2) velocity of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ from FWHM of emission component; (3) velocity of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ from the minimum flux of the absorption component; (4) velocity of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta };$ (5) velocity of Fe ii λ4924; (6) velocity of Fe ii λ5018; (7) velocity of Fe ii λ5169; (8) velocity of Fe ii/Sc ii; (9) velocity of Sc ii Multiplet; (10) velocity of Na i D; (11) velocity of Ba ii; (12) velocity of ScII; and (13) velocity of O i.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Table 9.  Mean pEW Values and the Stardard Deviations for Our Sample

Epoch ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$ Fe ii λ4924 Fe ii λ5018 Fe ii λ5169 Fe ii/Sc ii Sc ii Mult. Na i D Ba ii Sc ii O i
(Days) (Å) (Å) (Å) (Å) (Å) (Å) (Å) (Å) (Å) (Å) (Å) (Å)
4 0.8 ± 1.8 47.3 ± 28.7 11.9 ± 8.3 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0
8.6 4.34 ± 5.4 83.2 ± 46.4 24.8 ± 19.2 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0.1 ± 0.6 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0
12.8 8.6 ± 10.9 121.2 ± 61.2 33.3 ± 17.6 0.3 ± 1.3 1.2 ± 3.2 5.5 ± 8.6 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 11 ± 1.1
18.1 16.6 ± 17.3 157.2 ± 53.7 37.4 ± 14.8 0.2 ± 0.8 4.2 ± 4.8 14.5 ± 14.0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 5.67 ± 1.1
23.1 25.7 ± 22.1 147.8 ± 62.2 43.3 ± 18.8 1.4 ± 2.5 9.3 ± 5.5 22.4 ± 10.9 1.1 ± 2.5 1.02 ± 3.21 0.1 ± 0.3 0.1 ± 0.30 11.5 ± 8.6
27.7 25.0 ± 25.9 142.7 ± 55.2 43.8 ± 16.7 1.1 ± 2.5 9.6 ± 4.5 25.5 ± 9.5 1.4 ± 3.1 1.61 ± 3.99 0.3 ± 1.0 0.5 ± 1.40 10.9 ± 5.6
33.1 36.6 ± 20.4 155.7 ± 44.5 49.2 ± 13.6 2.8 ± 3.6 12.5 ± 4.0 30.2 ± 8.4 4.9 ± 4.4 6.48 ± 6.30 13.3 ± 7.6 1.1 ± 2.7 2.1 ± 3.17 9.8 ± 5.8
38.1 42.5 ± 23.3 152.9 ± 44.2 50.2 ± 16.4 3.8 ± 3.8 14.5 ± 6.0 33 ± 13.5 6.0 ± 5.0 8.09 ± 7.14 15.6 ± 8.3 2.0 ± 3.4 2.8 ± 4.00 10.6 ± 3.9
42.8 46.1 ± 22.7 142.0 ± 64.0 49.2 ± 15.9 6.1 ± 4.2 15.1 ± 5.4 32.9 ± 9.2 7.1 ± 4.8 10.5 ± 5.87 18.7 ± 10.3 2.8 ± 3.9 3.7 ± 3.77 11.0 ± 5.5
47.8 48.1 ± 21.6 169 ± 61.7 54.2 ± 18.3 6.4 ± 4.1 14.2 ± 5.8 34.6 ± 9.6 7.9 ± 3.3 11.5 ± 4.83 26.5 ± 12.5 4.3 ± 4.7 5.1 ± 3.26 13.0 ± 4.9
53.1 56.6 ± 21.7 156.9 ± 55.2 48.8 ± 20.3 8.1 ± 5.5 17.9 ± 5.9 40.2 ± 13.5 10.1 ± 4.7 14.0 ± 7.53 32.4 ± 15.2 5.6 ± 4.7 7.2 ± 5.64 11.9 ± 5.9
58.5 50.7 ± 24.9 169.7 ± 78.6 49.6 ± 26.4 7.5 ± 4.7 18.3 ± 7.4 39.8 ± 15.7 11.2 ± 5.5 16.0 ± 8.35 38.3 ± 20.0 6.4 ± 6.2 6.7 ± 5.09 11.1 ± 5.8
63.3 58.1 ± 18.4 173.3 ± 70.1 49.5 ± 25.1 9.7 ± 5.7 19.8 ± 5.6 44.1 ± 11.0 11.8 ± 5.3 18.2 ± 7.63 46.0 ± 17.5 7.9 ± 6.8 7.4 ± 4.78 10.8 ± 4.6
68.0 60.2 ± 17.3 163.3 ± 42.1 53.1 ± 27.0 9.4 ± 6.0 21.6 ± 7.0 42.8 ± 9.6 13.6 ± 6.1 19.5 ± 7.79 52.2 ± 17.1 8.2 ± 6.3 8.0 ± 5.88 12.1 ± 4.5
72.8 65.2 ± 20.8 179.5 ± 71.8 56.3 ± 32.2 9.6 ± 6.3 19.5 ± 6.3 41 ± 11.7 11.5 ± 5.9 17.3 ± 8.15 49.4 ± 24.5 8.1 ± 6.9 6.9 ± 5.61 14.3 ± 7.1
78.2 60.0 ± 21.4 167.0 ± 71.7 46.9 ± 26.1 11.6 ± 6.6 20.8 ± 7.8 42.4 ± 10.1 14.7 ± 5.2 22.9 ± 7.55 59.7 ± 21.8 12.6 ± 7.56 11.4 ± 4.7 12.7 ± 5.6
83.5 53.8 ± 31.1 202.2 ± 86.1 52.4 ± 27.9 10.4 ± 5.9 21.5 ± 7.8 47.0 ± 13.5 14.3 ± 5.2 21.3 ± 8.00 63.9 ± 28.6 12.8 ± 9.41 11.4 ± 7.4 11.1 ± 3.7
87.5 56.1 ± 26.9 176.4 ± 95.0 55.2 ± 28.8 10.5 ± 7.6 23.0 ± 7.5 51.3 ± 12.8 14.9 ± 6.2 21.6 ± 9.26 63.2 ± 19.0 11.4 ± 7.67 10.1 ± 6.5 15.4 ± 6.9
93.3 50.9 ± 28.8 182.9 ± 107.3 47.0 ± 26.7 13.3 ± 8.1 25.6 ± 8.2 48.2 ± 11.1 17.3 ± 7.7 27.3 ± 10.6 69.7 ± 17.7 16.6 ± 12.4 12.4 ± 6.5 11.5 ± 5.8
98.2 61.6 ± 28.3 214.4 ± 117.6 62.7 ± 29.3 14.9 ± 4.7 26.2 ± 7.0 46.4 ± 9.9 17.7 ± 6.2 27.6 ± 7.81 81.8 ± 26.4 17.6 ± 10.2 12.9 ± 6.7 12.4 ± 2.7
103.0 48.2 ± 25.9 184.8 ± 80.3 41.2 ± 24.8 19.1 ± 4.7 30.7 ± 3.9 48.8 ± 6.4 16.8 ± 6.6 26.4 ± 9.00 76.0 ± 14.9 34.6 ± 9.78 16.5 ± 4.0 11.8 ± 1.6
108.2 60.1 ± 19.0 208.9 ± 56.1 43.8 ± 15.5 15.9 ± 4.0 25.7 ± 2.6 41 ± 10.2 15.0 ± 0.0 21.5 ± 4.11 69.2 ± 20.8 20.3 ± 15.7 9.8 ± 2.7 13.0 ± 2.8
115.7 46.2 ± 18.6 287.5 ± 158.8 53.4 ± 29.4 7.9 ± 0.9 16.8 ± 6.2 35.1 ± 12.9 21.2 ± 3.5 16.3 ± 4.5 70.2 ± 23.1 22.4 ± 15.7 6.7 ± 4.5 8.9 ± 1.5

Note. Columns: (1) SN name; (2) pEW of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ absorption component; (3) pEW of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$ emission component; (4) pEW of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta };$ (5) pEW of Fe ii λ4924; (6) pEW of Fe ii λ5018; (7) pEW of Fe ii λ5169; (8) pEW of Fe ii/Sc ii; (9) pEW of Sc ii Multiplet; (10) pEW of Na i D; (11) pEW of Ba ii; (12) pEW of ScII; (13) pEW of O i.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Appendix B: Spectral Series

In this section, the spectral time-series for all SNe in our sample are presented. Figure 27 shows an example of the spectral evolution of SN 1986L. Plots for the full sample can be found in the online version.

Figure 27.

Figure 27.

SNe II SN 1986L spectra. (The complete figure set (120 images) is available.)

Standard image High-resolution image

Appendix C: SNID Matches

In this section, we present the best spectral matching plots for each SN in our sample. An example of this technique is shown in Figure 28 for SN 1986L. Plots for the full sample can be found in the online version.

Figure 28.

Figure 28.

Best spectral matching of SN 1986L using SNID. The plots show SN 1986L compared with SN 2006bp and SN 1999em at 6 and 7 days from explosion. (The complete figure set (430 images) is available.)

Standard image High-resolution image

Footnotes

  • This paper includes data gathered with the 6.5 m Magellan Telescopes located at Las Campanas Observatory, Chile; and the Gemini Observatory, Cerro Pachon, Chile (Gemini Program GS-2008B-Q-56). Based on observations collected at the European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere, Chile (ESO Programs 076.A-0156, 078.D-0048, 080.A-0516, and 082.A-0526).

  • 21 

    Throughout the remainder of the manuscript, we use SN II to refer to all SNe that would historically have been classified as SN IIP or SN IIL. In general, we will differentiate these events by referring to their specific light curve or spectral morphology, and we only return to this historical separation if clarification and comparison with previous works is required.

  • 22 

    In the data release, we include eight spectra of the SN 2000cb, an SN 1987A-like event, which is not analyzed in this work.

  • 23 
  • 24 
  • 25 

    Note that the results obtained from the spectral matching are not altered if you use either all of the visible wavelength spectrum or just the region between 4000 and 6000.

  • 26 
  • 27 

    Cachito is a Hispanic word that means a small piece of something (like a notch). We use this name to refer to the small absorption components blueward of ${{\rm{H}}}_{\alpha }$, giving its (until now) previously ambiguous nature.

  • 28 

    We label "Fe line forest" to that region around ${{\rm{H}}}_{\beta }$, where a series of Fe-group (e.g., Fe ii $\lambda 4629$, Sc ii $\lambda 4670$, and Fe ii $\lambda 4924$) absorption lines emerge.

  • 29 

    ttran+10 is defined as the transition time (in Vband) between the initial and the plateau decline, plus 10 days. In other words, ttran marks the start of the recombination phase. (See A14 and Gutiérrez et al. 2014 for more details.)

  • 30 

    Four SNe show a good match with Si ii in very early phases, but between 30 and 40 days they do not show it. They also show a different shape.

Please wait… references are loading.
10.3847/1538-4357/aa8f52