Letters

DISCOVERY OF A ZZ CETI IN THE KEPLER MISSION FIELD

, , , , , , , , , and

Published 2011 October 12 © 2011. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation J. J. Hermes et al 2011 ApJL 741 L16 DOI 10.1088/2041-8205/741/1/L16

2041-8205/741/1/L16

ABSTRACT

We report the discovery of the first identified pulsating DA white dwarf, WD J1916+3938 (Kepler ID 4552982), in the field of the Kepler mission. This ZZ Ceti star was first identified through ground-based, time-series photometry, and follow-up spectroscopy confirms that it is a hydrogen-atmosphere white dwarf with Teff = 11,129 ± 115 K and log g = 8.34 ± 0.06, placing it within the empirical ZZ Ceti instability strip. The object shows up to 0.5% amplitude variability at several periods between 800 and 1450 s. Extended Kepler observations of WD J1916+3938 could yield the best light curve, to date, of any pulsating white dwarf, allowing us to directly study the interior of an evolved object representative of the fate of the majority of stars in our Galaxy.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. INTRODUCTION

Hydrogen-atmosphere (DA) white dwarf (WD) stars account for more than 80% of all spectroscopically identified WDs (Eisenstein et al. 2006). When these objects cool to around 12,500 K, the hydrogen in their non-degenerate atmosphere forms a partial ionization zone, impeding energy transport and leading to global g-mode oscillations. It is believed that all DA WD stars with carbon/oxygen cores undergo such pulsations when they reach the appropriate temperature (Castanheira et al. 2007), allowing us to probe a stellar population representative of the fate of most stars in our Galaxy, including our Sun.

Asteroseismology provides a unique opportunity to investigate the internal structure of these stars (see reviews by Winget & Kepler 2008; Fontaine & Brassard 2008). Given enough observed modes, we can put accurate estimates on the overall stellar mass, hydrogen and helium layer masses, internal chemical transition zones, magnetic field strength, and rotation rate. Performing asteroseismology on a WD benefits from its degenerate interior, which makes its structure less complicated than for stars still undergoing fusion.

In an effort to reduce aliasing caused by gaps in the data, much effort has been expended to obtain uninterrupted time-series observations of these variable DA (DAV) stars (also known as ZZ Ceti stars), using the Whole Earth Telescope (Nather et al. 1990). However, these ground-based campaigns rarely extend beyond a few weeks, fundamentally limited by weather and moonlight, not to mention the availability of telescope time.

Space-based photometry has revolutionized the extended coverage of stars. The Kepler spacecraft was launched in 2009 March, and while its primary mission is to detect Earth-sized planets around Sun-like stars, its extensive light curves are transforming many fields in asteroseismology. The spacecraft stares at some 156,000 stars and has the capability to monitor 512 objects with one-minute cadence. Month-long observations typically yield a duty cycle of more than 97% with micromagnitude precision, depending on the brightness of the target.

Despite an expansive search (Østensen et al. 2010, 2011b) in which 17 compact objects were targeted by Kepler as potential pulsating WD stars, none were observed to vary above the 4σ detection limit. One DAV candidate, KIC10420021, was monitored for seven months and is stable to at least 60 parts-per-million (ppm). Kepler has monitored a uniquely variable DA, but that system is best explained by a magnetic spin-modulated WD model, not by pulsations (Holberg & Howell 2011). However, as part of a recent auxiliary search, Østensen et al. (2011a) announced the successful detection of the first pulsating WD in the Kepler field, a V777 Her star. It was quite a fortuitous discovery, as this was just the second DB found in the field and has a Kepler magnitude of $\textit {Kp}=18.46$.

Using facilities at the McDonald Observatory in west Texas, we have discovered the first ZZ Ceti star in the Kepler field, WD J191643.83+393849.7 (Kepler ID 4552982, hereafter WD J1916+3938). This object has a Kepler magnitude of $\textit {Kp}\,{=}\,17.85$ (Brown et al. 2011). Previous Kepler observations of such faint, blue objects have reached better than 130 ppm (0.013%) precision with just one month's worth of data. Extended short-cadence Kepler observations will provide a detailed look at the pulsation spectrum of this cool ZZ Ceti star.

2. HIGH-SPEED PHOTOMETRIC OBSERVATIONS

2.1. Selection and Time-series Photometry

Potential pulsating WDs in the Kepler field were selected from a recent list of high reduced proper motion stars in the SuperCOSMOS Sky Survey (Rowell & Hambly 2011). From their catalog of roughly 10,000 candidate WDs, we found 20 that actually fell on Kepler CCDs. Five of those had already been surveyed by Kepler and found not to vary (Østensen et al. 2010, 2011b).

One of the remaining 15, WD J1916+3938, fell in the foot- print of the POSS-II survey, and showed ($\textit {B}-$R), ($\textit {R}-$I) colors extremely close to values for a typical ZZ Ceti star, so it was targeted for time-series photometric observations. The discovery observations were performed at the McDonald Observatory using the Argos instrument, a frame-transfer CCD mounted at the prime focus of the 2.1 m Otto Struve telescope (Nather & Mukadam 2004). Data were obtained through a 1 mm BG40 filter to reduce sky noise.

Photometric observations were carried out over six nights in 2011 May, for a total of more than 21 hr of coverage. Exposure times ranged from 5 to 15 s, depending on seeing and cloud conditions.

We performed weighted, circular aperture photometry on the calibrated frames using the external IRAF package $\textit {ccd\_hsp}$ written by Antonio Kanaan. We divided the sky-subtracted light curves using at least three brighter comparison stars in the field to allow for fluctuations in seeing and cloud cover. Using the WQED software suite (Thompson & Mullally 2009), we fit a second-order polynomial to the data to remove the long-term trend caused by atmospheric extinction and applied a timing correction to each observation to account for the motion of the Earth around the barycenter of the solar system.

Figure 1 shows a representative light curve, smoothed by a four-point moving average window for visualization purposes with the brightest comparison star offset below.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Portion of the light curve for WD J1916+3938, taken on 2011 May 11, that has been smoothed by a four-point moving average. The red, offset light curve is from one of the brightest comparison star in the field.

Standard image High-resolution image

2.2. Ground-based Light curve Analysis

We performed a Fourier transform (FT) of the entire data set, 7454 points spread over nearly a month for a duty cycle of 3.1% (Figure 2). This FT extends to the Nyquist frequency for Kepler short-cadence observations; there is nothing above the 4σ threshold for higher frequencies. The window function is quite messy, as there are variably spaced gaps in the data.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. Fourier transform of our 2011 May data on WD J1916+3938. The red transform has been computed after prewhitening by the seven periodicities listed in Table 1, which removes all peaks above four times the mean FT level, σ. We have ignored the low-frequency peaks in this FT, with periods longer than 2000 s, which are likely to be noise from variability in Earth's atmosphere.

Standard image High-resolution image

While Kepler will allow us to improve our determination of the periodicities present in this star, we attempt to identify the periods present in all our 2011 May data. Table 1 lists the highest seven peaks, all with power above four times the mean FT level. The large aliasing present makes it nearly impossible to determine, with much certainty, the true periods in this short, ground-based data set, so we have omitted the formal least-squares errors. It appears that this star has several excited modes between 800 and 1450 s, although the amplitudes appear unstable from night to night. There is power consistently well above the noise around 970 s and 820 s each night, although the level of excitation appears inconsistent.

Table 1. Frequencies Present in WD J1916+3938 from May 3–31

ID Frequency Period Amplitude
  (μHz) (s) (%)
f1 1032.1 968.9 0.44
f2 1213.7 823.9 0.38
f3 1070.1 934.5 0.36
f4 1198.9 834.1 0.32
f5 918.3 1089.0 0.25
f6 696.0 1436.7 0.24
f7 854.8 1169.9 0.23

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

For the sake of comparison, we also took an FT of all the data for the brightest comparison star in the field. The average amplitude over all frequency space is 0.03%, the same level as our formal least-squares amplitude errors.

3. SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSIS

3.1. Spectroscopic Observations

Excitement among the Kepler compact object community, specifically Working Group 11 within the Kepler Asteroseismic Science Consortium (KASC), led to multiple spectroscopic follow-ups, and WD J1916+3938 was observed using four different telescopes, especially after our first spectrum from the Nordic Optical Telescope (NOT) confirmed the object as a DA within the ZZ Ceti instability strip. Fits to these observations were used to derive an effective temperature and surface gravity.

Observations using the 9.2 m Hobby-Eberly Telescope (HET) at McDonald Observatory were carried out with the Marcario Low Resolution Spectrograph (LRS) using its g2_2.0 setup. The observations using the 2.6 m NOT at the Roque de los Muchachos Observatory were done in low resolution with the ALFOSC spectrograph and its grism 7. The observations using the 3.5 m telescope at Calar Alto Observatory (CAHA) were done in medium-resolution with the Cassegrain Twin Spectrograph (TWIN) spectrograph, using grating T06 for the red arm and grating T12 for the blue arm. Finally, the observations using the 4 m Mayall Telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory (KPNO) were done in low resolution with the R-C CCD Spectrograph. Each spectral image and flux standard were reduced using standard long-slit IRAF routines.

The KPNO spectrum of WD J1916+3938, showing the Balmer lines Hβ through H9, can be seen in Figure 3. Overplotted is the best-fit DA model spectrum.

Figure 3.

Figure 3. KPNO spectrum of WD J1916+3938, showing the Balmer lines Hβ through H9. Overplotted in red is the best-fit DA model spectrum.

Standard image High-resolution image

We have fit model grid spectra to each of these observations, using the procedure outlined in Bergeron et al. (1992). The WD models used for the spectroscopic fitting were kindly provided by Detlev Koester and are described in Koester (2010). Balmer lines in the models were calculated with the modified Stark broadening profiles of Tremblay & Bergeron (2009), kindly made available by the authors, and use the mixing length prescription ML2/α = 0.6. Table 2 lists the best fits to the observations. Using a weighted mean of all four determinations, we adopt a best value of Teff = 11,129 ± 115 K and log g = 8.34 ± 0.06. This places the object within the empirical ZZ Ceti instability strip.

Table 2. Spectroscopically Determined Parameters

Instrument Date Observed Wavelength Range Teff log g
    (Å) (K) (dex)
NOT/ALFOSC 2011 May 22 3850–6850 11,152 ± 80 8.24 ± 0.06
CAHA/TWIN 2011 Jun 17 3500–5450/5700–6790 11,116 ± 139 8.36 ± 0.09
HET/LRS 2011 Jun 14 4300–7200 11,104 ± 150 9.51 ± 0.43
KPNO/RCS 2011 Jun 9 3650–5120 11,115 ± 92 8.43 ± 0.05
Adopted     11,129 ± 115 8.34 ± 0.06

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

3.2. Implications

ZZ Ceti stars at the hotter, blue edge of the instability strip tend to pulsate with short period (100–300 s) modes that have been shown to be extremely stable in period and amplitude. Such stars have been the focus of works to detect an evolutionary rate of period change of these modes (e.g., Kepler et al. 2005; Mukadam et al. 2009). However, the ZZ Ceti stars near the cooler, red edge of the instability strip with effective temperatures near 11,000 K typically feature much longer periods (>600 s) and have more excited modes. These pulsations are typically unstable in amplitude and phase.

Spectroscopic fits show that WD J1916+3938 has an effective temperature that places it in the cooler region of the ZZ Ceti instability strip. This result is duly confirmed by our time-series photometric observations. WD J1916+3938 shows long-period oscillations—its weighted mean period (Mukadam et al. 2006) lies around 1003 s—that do not appear stable in amplitude. For example, during the runs from May 27 to 29, the power observed in the mode near 824 s went from (0.66 ± 0.06)% to (0.88 ± 0.05)% to (0.43 ± 0.05)%, respectively.

Many modes in other cool ZZ Ceti stars have amplitudes that grow and decay in a way that cannot be explained by beating (e.g., Kleinman et al. 1998), so we expect the same to be true with this star. The opportunity for nearly continuous Kepler observations of this amplitude modulation may afford us a completely new insight into the growth and decay of mode amplitudes, opening a new window into how these objects behave on a variety of timescales inaccessible from the ground.

4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

We have discovered just the second pulsating WD in the Kepler field, and the first ZZ Ceti star suitable for Kepler monitoring. Several modes appear to be excited from 800 to 1450 s, with a fractional amplitude of up to 0.5%. Spectroscopic fits yield an effective temperature of 11,129 ± 115 K and a surface gravity of log g = 8.34 ± 0.06, which corresponds to a mass of 0.82 ± 0.04 M from the evolutionary models of Wood (1990). This spectroscopic temperature puts it on the cool, red edge of the ZZ Ceti instability strip, where pulsations may begin shutting down.

Submitted for Kepler observations through KASC, the spacecraft is scheduled to commence short-cadence observations on this ZZ Ceti pulsator in 2011 October (Q11). By virtue of its impressive duty cycle, we anticipate that extended Kepler observations will yield the best light curve, to date, of any pulsating WD, even those that are more than four magnitudes brighter.

The light curves can be analyzed from a variety of asteroseismic angles. With enough modes, we will be able to put an accurate constraint on the overall mass of the WD. Perhaps more importantly, we may also extract an accurate estimate for the hydrogen layer mass, which controls the rate at which this star cools. This hydrogen mass fraction has been constrained through asteroseismology in fewer than a dozen DA WDs (Dolez et al. 2006), although Castanheira & Kepler (2009) attempted to derive the parameter from the few modes present in an ensemble of 83 ZZ Ceti stars. Uncertainties in this parameter are imprinted as scatter in the WD luminosity function, which is used in cosmochronology to put an estimate on the age of the Galaxy (e.g., Winget et al. 1987; Harris et al. 2006).

The sensitivity of Kepler observations may also allow us to see a wealth of low-amplitude multiplet structure. Previous ground-based campaigns on cool ZZ Ceti stars, such as G29-38, have revealed instability in the amplitude of these multiplets (Kleinman et al. 1998). Extended Kepler coverage will allow us to observe how the amplitudes of all modes in this star change with time.

ZZ Ceti stars often exhibit some nonlinear combination frequencies, which are believed to arise from convective driving (e.g., Brickhill 1992; Wu 2001). If observable, these combination frequencies may be used to identify the spherical degree of the parent modes (Yeates et al. 2005). With an ideal Kepler light curve, we would be able to compare this mode identification with the ℓ values as determined from the period spacings. Pulse-shape fitting of properly identified modes may also be used to constrain some of the convective parameters in this star, especially the depth of the convection zone (Montgomery et al. 2010).

For now, though, we eagerly await the unrivaled staring competition Kepler will have with this cool ZZ Ceti star.

We thank KASC WG11 for their enthusiasm, especially regarding spectroscopic follow-ups. This work is supported by the Norman Hackerman Advanced Research Program, under grants 003658-0255-2007 and 003658-0252-2009, by a grant from the NASA Origins Program, NAG5-13094, and by the National Science Foundation, under grant AST-0909107. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013)/ERC grant agreement n°227224 (PROSPERITY), as well as from the Research Council of K.U. Leuven grant agreement GOA/2008/04. This work was partly based on observations made with the Nordic Optical Telescope, operated on the island of La Palma jointly by Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden. We thank the McDonald Observatory staff for their support, especially Dave Doss and John Kuehne.

Please wait… references are loading.
10.1088/2041-8205/741/1/L16