This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.

HINTS FOR NEUTRINO-PROCESS BORON IN PRESOLAR SILICON CARBIDE GRAINS FROM SUPERNOVAE

, , and

Published 2011 February 25 © 2011. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Wataru Fujiya et al 2011 ApJL 730 L7 DOI 10.1088/2041-8205/730/1/L7

2041-8205/730/1/L7

ABSTRACT

We have studied more than 1000 presolar silicon carbide (SiC) grains from the Murchison CM2 chondrite for C- and Si-isotopic compositions. Twelve SiC X grains, characterized by strong enrichments in 28Si and believed to originate from Type II Supernovae (SNeII), were also measured for Li- and B-isotopic compositions. None of these grains show resolvable isotope anomalies in Li or B. For the seven X grains without Li and B contributions from nearby or attached SiC grains of distinct origins we find on average 7Li/6Li = 11.83 ± 0.29 (solar system: 12.06) and 11B/10B = 4.68 ± 0.31 (solar system: 4.03). The average 7Li/6Li is compatible with the solar system ratio and the lithium in the X grains is likely largely dominated by contaminating Li of laboratory or meteoritic origin. Also, most of the boron in X grains appears to be contamination but the small 11B excess of ∼16%, significant at the 2σ level, can be considered a hint for the presence of boron produced by the neutrino process in the parent SNeII. Despite this finding, a quantitative comparison of the B isotope and abundance data of X grains with model predictions reveals deficiencies in our current understanding of the details of B production in SNeII as well as on B chemistry and condensation in SNII ejecta.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. INTRODUCTION

Among the light and intermediate-mass elements Li, Be, and B are those with the lowest abundances (Lodders et al. 2009). This is because they are largely by-passed by standard stellar nucleosynthesis. Their production relies to a large extent on spallation reactions between high-energy (>100 MeV) Galactic cosmic rays (GCRs), consisting mostly of protons and alpha-particles, and abundant target nuclei such as 12C, 14N, and 16O in the interstellar medium (ISM). Predicted Li and B isotope ratios are 7Li/6Li ∼1.4 and 11B/10B = 2.5 (Reeves 1994), significantly lower than the solar system ratios which are 7Li/6Li = 12.06 (Seitz et al. 2007) and 11B/10B = 4.03 (CI average; Zhai et al. 1996). It was proposed that Li, Be, and B can also be produced by spallation reactions between low-energy (MeV range) C and O nuclei and interstellar H in star-forming regions (Cassé et al. 1995). These reactions are predicted to result in a ∼2× lower than solar 7Li/6Li ratio, i.e., in a shift in the same direction as with the standard GCR spallation scenario, but in a ∼1.5× higher than solar 11B/10B ratio.

In massive stars, Li, Be, and B are largely destroyed during pre-main-sequence and main-sequence evolution but models predict production of significant amounts of 7Li and 11B by the ν-process and of 11B also by α-capture on 7Be and 7Li in a later evolutionary phase when such stars explode as Type II supernovae (SNeII; Woosley & Weaver 1995; Rauscher et al. 2002; Yoshida et al. 2008). The predicted Li and B isotope ratios depend on a variety of stellar parameters, e.g., mass and neutrino temperature. Compared to their initial abundances at stellar birth, 7Li will not change significantly but 11B is expected to be heavily enriched in the ejecta. In the overall ejecta of the 15 M SNII model by Rauscher et al. (2002), the predicted 7Li/6Li and 11B/10B ratios are ∼3000 and ∼300, respectively, i.e., much higher than the solar system ratios.

It is apparent that in order to account for the observed solar system Li and B isotope ratios, contributions from at least two sources are required. Here we will use so-called presolar grains to get new insights into the production of the Li and B isotopes. Presolar grains are samples of stardust, nm to μm in size, that are found in small quantities in primitive meteorites (Lodders & Amari 2005; Zinner 2007; Hoppe 2008). These grains formed in the winds of evolved stars and in the ejecta of stellar explosions and their isotopic compositions can be used to get information on, e.g., stellar nucleosynthesis and evolution, Galactic chemical evolution, and grain processing in the ISM. Presolar grains exhibit large isotope anomalies (with respect to solar system abundances) not only in the major elements but also in a large number of minor and trace elements contained in the grains. Among the identified presolar minerals are silicon carbide (SiC), graphite, silicon nitride, refractory oxides, and silicates. Most of the presolar grains apparently are from 1 to 3 M asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars but a noticeable fraction appears to come from SNeII. Among these grains are the so-called SiC X grains (Amari et al. 1992; Nittler et al. 1996; Hoppe et al. 2000) which comprise about 1% of all presolar SiC grains. The X grains show higher than solar 12C/13C (most grains), lower than solar 14N/15N, and large excesses in 28Si. They also carry the decay products of now extinct 26Al (half-life ∼700,000 yr), 44Ti (half-life 60 yr), and possibly 49V (half-life 330 days).

Li- and B-isotopic compositions have been measured in presolar SiC grains from AGB stars (Huss et al. 1997; Hoppe et al. 2001; Gyngard et al. 2007, 2009; Lyon et al. 2007). No B isotope anomalies could be identified in these studies; however, Gyngard et al. (2009) found large 6Li enrichments of up to 30%, probably resulting from cosmic ray irradiation while the grains were traveling through interstellar space. From these enrichments cosmic ray exposure ages of between 40 and 1000 Myr were inferred. Lyon et al. (2007) developed a new separation method for isolating presolar SiC from meteorites that keeps surface alterations minimal. The authors found very high Li and B abundances in the outer layers of the SiC grains with Li/Si and B/Si ratios of up to ∼10−2; in the interior these ratios drop to ∼10−5. These results are interpreted as evidence of implantation of high-velocity Li and B ions into the grains by shock waves as the grains traveled through star-forming regions some time after their condensation in the outflow of an AGB star that was their progenitor.

In addition to the studies on AGB star grains several SiC X grains were measured for B abundances and isotopic compositions by Hoppe et al. (2001). These authors found no B isotope anomalies within rather large uncertainties and B concentrations lower than expected in view of predicted B production in SNeII and condensation calculations. The close-to-normal B-isotopic compositions were likely the result of B laboratory contamination and the lower than expected B/Si ratios have been interpreted to reflect lower B production in SNeII than currently predicted and/or specific mixing conditions in the SN ejecta in which the X grains were formed. In this work we extend the study by Hoppe et al. (2001) in that we used the new generation NanoSIMS ion probe, which permits to make isotope studies with much better spatial resolution, thereby minimizing contributions from B contamination, and with higher precision than was possible with the conventional ion probe used in the study by Hoppe et al. (2001). Furthermore, we included Li isotope measurements in our study of X grains.

2. EXPERIMENTAL

The SiC grains of this study were separated from a 30 g sample of the Murchison CM2 meteorite (Besmehn & Hoppe 2003), following the technique of Amari et al. (1994). Thousands of SiC grains were transferred to several clean Au foils, one of which (sample "Muri7") was used for the study presented here. Areas suitable for ion imaging (see below) were selected in the Leo 1530 field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) at the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry in Mainz.

The SiC X grains were identified by ion imaging with the Cameca NanoSIMS 50 ion probe at Max Planck Institute for Chemistry (Gröner & Hoppe 2006). Prior to ion imaging the samples were cleaned by pre-sputtering 170 × 170 μm2 sized areas for about 20 minutes with a Cs+ ion beam of ∼100 pA. The ion imaging consists essentially of three steps: (1) acquisition of ion images of 12C, 13C, 28Si, 29Si, and 30Si in a multi-collection mode, produced by rastering (256 × 256 pixels, 15,000 μs pixel−1) a focused primary Cs+ ion beam (∼100 nm, ∼1 pA) over 30 × 30 μm2 sized areas on the Au foil; (2) recognition of SiC grains based on the 28Si ion image and acquisition of ion images with size of two times the grain size around each identified grain with an integration time of 60 s; and (3) movement of the sample stage to the adjacent area and repetition with step (1). A total of 99 areas were analyzed in this way. All X grains were then documented in the SEM.

Except one grain, which could not be relocated in the NanoSIMS, all X grains were analyzed for Li- and B-isotopic compositions. For this purpose, 6Li+, 7Li+, 10B+, 11B+, and 28Si+ ions, produced by rastering (64 × 64 pixels) an O primary ion beam (<1–5 pA, 300–500 nm) over (2 × 2) to (7 × 7) μm2 sized areas around the grains, were measured in a multi-collection mode. Between 25 and 52 image planes were recorded for each grain. Prior to the isotope measurements the grains were cleaned by pre-sputtering with an ∼100 pA O beam for 3–5 minutes.

Three different standards were used to infer the relative sensitivity factors (RSF) for Li/Si (ε(Li)/ε(Si)) and B/Si (ε(B)/ε(Si)), and the instrumental mass fractionation for Li and B isotope measurements: A NIST SRM611 glass wafer (485 ppm Li, 356 ppm B; Pearce et al. 1997), small (∼1 μm) SRM611 glass grains dispersed on a clean Au foil, and a synthetic SiC wafer doped with 7Li and 11B (with 7Li/28Si = 1.14 × 10−4 and 11B/28Si = 1.42 × 10−4 at peak position; sample from Toray Research Center, Japan). The inferred B/Si RSF values for B/Si measured in the SRM611 glass wafer and the doped SiC gave essentially the same result with ε(B)/ε(Si) ∼ 0.5, i.e., there is no large matrix effect. Lithium in the SRM611 glass wafer turned out to be very heterogeneous and in most locations very low and no useful ε(Li)/ε(Si) could be obtained; from measurements on the doped SiC standard we inferred ε(Li)/ε(Si) ∼ 6. Large differences are evident when the RSF values measured on the SRM611 glass wafer and grain mount are compared. The measurements on the grains gave ε(Li)/ε(Si) ∼ 15 and ε(B)/ε(Si) ∼ 2, about factors of 2.5 and 4 larger than those measured in the doped SiC and/or SRM611 glass wafer. Apparently, the Li/Si and B/Si ratios are very sensitive to topographic effects, probably due to the short distance between the sample and extraction lens in the NanoSIMS. The RSF values inferred from the SRM611 grain measurements were used to determine Li/Si and B/Si ratios in the X grains of this study. We note that the uncertainties on the Li/Si and B/Si ratios in X grains are at least a factor of two. Measured B isotope ratios in X grains were normalized to measurements on SRM611 (11B/10B = 4.04; Kasemann et al. 2001); measured 11B+/10B+ ratios were the same in the SRM611 glass wafer and the grains within the measurement error of about 2%, i.e., topographic effects are largely negligible for B isotope measurements. Measured Li isotope ratios in X grains were normalized to measurements on Li contamination on the Muri7 sample mount and Li in the SRM611 grains (assumed to have the solar system 7Li/6Li of 12.06; Seitz et al. 2007) which showed identical 7Li+/6Li+ ratios within the measurement error of 2%.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

By ion imaging, 1125 presolar SiC grains were identified. Based on their C- and Si-isotopic compositions (Figure 1), about 2% are AB grains, 85% mainstream grains, 4% Y grains, and 4% Z grains. Thirteen X grains were found (Table 1), representing about 1% of all SiC grains. Some grains could not be unequivocally referred to one of these groups. These abundances are in line with previous studies (e.g., Nittler & Alexander 2003; Zinner et al. 2007; Hoppe et al. 2010). Following ion imaging all X grains were relocated in the SEM. Seven X grains turned out to be single grains with sizes between 0.6 and 1.5 μm (Table 1), the remaining grains comprise in fact at least two grains. The single grains have 12C/13C ratios between 38 and 345, with six of them having isotopically light C, δ29Si from −178‰ to −556‰, and δ30Si from −245‰ to −432‰. All Li and B isotope ratios of single X grains as well as of grain agglomerates (one agglomerate could not be relocated in the NanoSIMS for B and Li measurements) are solar within 1.2σ (7Li/6Li) and 1.8σ (11B/10B) (Figures 2 and 3). When averages (calculated by integrating the respective ion signals over all grains, errors are calculated from counting statistics) of the seven X grains are considered then 7Li/6Li is solar as well; for 11B/10B, however, there is a small 11B excess of 161‰ ± 77‰, i.e., the anomaly is about 2σ. For the single X grains, Li/Si ratios are 0.3–4.5 × solar (median: 1.9 ×), B/Si ratios are 0.6–10 × solar (median: 1.7 ×). These abundances bear systematic uncertainties of at least a factor of two (see above).

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Silicon-isotopic compositions of presolar SiC grains in this study given as per mil deviation from the solar system 29Si/28Si and 30Si/28Si ratios. X grains without contributions from nearby SiC grains of distinct origins and analyzed for Li- and B-isotopic compositions are shown in black. The Si-isotopic compositions in the Si/S, He/C, He/N, and H zones of a 15 M SNII (Rauscher et al. 2002) are shown for comparison.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 2.

Figure 2. Li- and B-isotopic ratios in seven SiC X grains. Predictions for spallation-produced Li and B by GCR (Reeves 1994; Cassé et al. 1995) and for a 15 M SNII (Rauscher et al. 2002) with consideration of special mixing conditions (model s15a28c, relative mass fractions of selected SN zones: Si/S:He/C:He/N:H = 0.14%:36.6%:21.6%:41.6%) are shown for comparison.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 3.

Figure 3. Boron-isotopic compositions as a function of B/Si ratios in SiC X grains. Predictions for GCR-produced B (Reeves 1994; Cassé et al. 1995) and B from a 15 M SNII (Rauscher et al. 2002) with consideration of specific mixing conditions (see the legend to Figure 2) are shown for comparison.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 1. C-, Si-, Li-, and B-isotopic Compositions of SiC X Grains from the Murchison Meteorite

Grain Size 12C/13C δ29Sia δ30Sia 7Li/6Li 11B/10B Li/Si B/Si
  (μm)   (‰) (‰)     (10−5) (10−5)
Single X grains
X1 0.6 114 ± 2 −178 ± 11 −265 ± 9 11.87 ± 0.63 4.51 ± 0.77 9.69 3.33
X2 1.2 128 ± 2 −377 ± 11 −261 ± 10 12.06 ± 0.62 5.06 ± 0.58 23.8 18.8
X3 1.5 244 ± 5 −205 ± 10 −297 ± 7 11.48 ± 0.86 4.54 ± 0.63 1.76 1.92
X4 1.0 241 ± 6 −556 ± 10 −245 ± 9 12.00 ± 0.56 4.85 ± 1.19 24.8 3.31
X9 0.6 38 ± 1 −361 ± 10 −394 ± 8 11.20 ± 1.01 4.19 ± 0.70 10.8 11.4
X11 0.8 326 ± 14 −358 ± 12 −432 ± 11 11.78 ± 2.03 4.99 ± 1.88 3.66 3.00
X13 0.7 345 ± 6 −261 ± 10 −424 ± 7 11.59 ± 0.93 4.37 ± 2.04 10.7 1.14
Average         11.83 ± 0.29 4.68 ± 0.31    
X grains + other nearby/attached SiC grains
X5   34 ± 1 −226 ± 11 −120 ± 10 12.21 ± 0.41 4.36 ± 0.40 40.2 18.8
X6   88 ± 1 −236 ± 11 −189 ± 9 13.06 ± 1.36 3.83 ± 0.27 2.15 14.2
X7   78 ± 1 −281 ± 11 −208 ± 10 11.20 ± 2.40 11.47 ± 6.36 8.28 9.48
X8   76 ± 1 −223 ± 10 −266 ± 8 11.29 ± 0.64 4.27 ± 0.29 4.80 12.4
X12   83 ± 1 −271 ± 11 −242 ± 10 11.54 ± 0.52 4.13 ± 0.46 24.3 14.2
Average         11.90 ± 0.28 4.16 ± 0.17    
Solar   89 0 0 12.06 4.03 5.6 1.9

Note. aδiSi = [(iSi/28Si)/(iSi/28Si) − 1] × 1000.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Elements like Mg and Ca are not expected to condense in large amounts into SiC (Hoppe et al. 2001). This is in agreement with measurements on SiC X grains that show strong depletions of these elements by 2–4 orders of magnitude relative to solar abundances (Hoppe et al. 2001). Because of its chemical similarity we would expect the same for Li. However, Li/Si ratios are around solar in the X grains of this study (Table 1), i.e., SN Li, expected to be strongly enriched in 7Li (Figures 2 and 4), is likely to represent only a tiny fraction of measured Li. Since the other potential Li production scenarios, namely, spallation reactions, will result in strong enrichments in 6Li (Figure 2), which is not observed, the conclusion is inevitable that the observed Li is dominated by laboratory or meteoritic contamination. This conclusion is in line with the measurements by Gyngard et al. (2009) on presolar SiC grains of likely AGB star origins. These authors observed large 6Li enrichments which were interpreted to be the result of cosmic ray spallation reactions with exposure times between 40 and 1000 Myr. However, Li/Si ratios are about two to three orders of magnitude lower in the grains studied by Gyngard et al. (2009) than those in the X grains of this study. If we assume comparable exposure times then we must conclude that standard GCR-produced Li could have accounted only marginally to the Li in the X grains studied here. If we assume an extremely violent irradiation scenario around the SN parent stars, the contribution of spallation-produced Li might be higher. However, in a simple two-component mixing calculation, considering spallation-produced Li with 7Li/6Li = 5 (by taking the higher value of the two spallation scenarios, 7Li/6Li ∼ 1.5 for standard GCR and 5 for low-energy GCR; Reeves 1994; Reedy 1989; Cassé et al. 1995) and Li contamination with 7Li/6Li = 12.06, the contribution of spallogenic Li is limited to ∼4% given the observed 2σ lower limit for the average 7Li/6Li ratio of 11.46 in our X grains. Here we included also the five X grains that are not single grains because AGB star grains, which would not have experienced the extreme irradiation, would contribute only negligibly to the overall Li. In this scenario, Lispal/Si is ∼10−6, about three orders of magnitude higher than what would be expected from standard GCR irradiation if spallogenic Li retention for grain sizes in the range of the X grains considered here is taken into account (Gyngard et al. 2009). We consider this as extremely unlikely and the contribution of spallogenic Li is likely much lower.

Figure 4.

Figure 4. Profiles for mass fractions of selected isotopes in the interior of a 15 M SNII (model s15a28c; Rauscher et al. 2002). The different SN zones are indicated at the top.

Standard image High-resolution image

For B we are facing a different situation. Since irradiation production of Li and B will lead to B/Li ∼ 1 (Reedy 1989; Cassé et al. 1995), like for Li, a contribution of spallogenic B to the overall B in X grains is likely to be negligible. However, based on the similarity of B and Al chemistry under equilibrium condensation conditions with C/O > 1 and observed Al abundances in X grains, Hoppe et al. (2001) argued that B abundances in X grains should roughly reflect B abundances at the condensation site in SNII ejecta. When matter from the different SNII zones (Meyer et al. 1995) is mixed in different proportions, then it is possible to reproduce many of the isotopic signatures of X grains (e.g., Hoppe et al. 2000; Lin et al. 2010). Typical mixing scenarios consider matter from the He/C, He/N, and H zones to account for observed C- and N-isotopic ratios and C/O > 1 and matter from the inner Si/S zone to account for the observed enrichments in 28Si (cf. Figure 1). In Figure 4, we have plotted profiles of 7Li, 10B, 11B, 12C, 13C, and 28Si in the interior of a 15 M SNII (Rauscher et al. 2002). As can be seen, B/Si ratios are high in the He/C (and O/C) zone and mixing scenarios that can reproduce the C, N, and Si isotope ratios of typical X grains have B/Si ratios on the order of 10−4, about one order of magnitude higher than observed in the X grains of this study. This implies that the B condensation is not as efficient as predicted (Hoppe et al. 2001) or that the B production in SNII, to a large extent the result of ν-reactions (Woosley & Weaver 1995; Rauscher et al. 2002; Yoshida et al. 2008), is much lower than thought. Boron from SNII is expected to be heavily enriched in 11B. In order to account for the observed range of C- and Si-isotopic compositions of the X grains of this study material from the He/C, He/N, H, and Si/S zones must be mixed in variable proportions. Since B is dominated by B from the He/C zone (Figure 4), 11B/10B does not vary much in the different SN mixtures; for mixtures that can reproduce the C- and Si-isotopic signatures of our X grains, 11B/10B is always much larger than the solar 11B/10B ratio and varies by only a factor of 2.5. Because of this it is justified to treat the X grains together as a single B reservoir and to draw conclusions from the average 11B/10B ratio. For a typical X grain with 12C/13C = 200 and δ29,30Si = −330‰, an SN mixing calculation, based on the 15 M SN model of Rauscher et al. (2002), gives 11B/10B ∼ 300 and B/Si ∼ 10−4 (scenario 1). Even if we assume that the 11B production is 10 times less efficient than predicted then 11B/10B is still around 30 and B/Si ∼10−5 (scenario 2). These 11B/10B ratios are significantly higher than observed in the X grains of this study and we conclude that much of the observed B is contamination. With 12% (scenario 1) and, respectively, 14% (scenario 2) SN B (the percentages comprise the sum of 10B and 11B) and the remainder B contamination, the observed 11B/10B in the X grains can be reproduced. In both scenarios, the fraction of B with SN origin has B/Si ∼ 10−6 which is one (scenario 2) or two (scenario 1) orders of magnitude lower than predicted for the SN mixtures. In any case, the small 11B enrichments in X grains, significant at the 2σ level, i.e., with 95% confidence, give a first observational hint that SNeII are in fact a source of 11B. We also note, however, that the B isotope and abundance data reveal deficiencies in our current understanding of the details of B production in SNeII as well as on B chemistry and condensation in SNII ejecta. It is hoped that these issues will be addressed in improved models of the ν-process in SNeII and of dust condensation in SN ejecta.

We thank Joachim Huth for the SEM analyses, Elmar Gröner for support on the NanoSIMS, Toshitaka Kajino for helpful discussions, Alexander Heger for providing detailed SN data on www.nucleosynthesis.org, and an anonymous referee for helpful comments. W.F. acknowledges support from the JSPS Global COE program of Tokyo Institute of Technology and the University of Tokyo.

Please wait… references are loading.
10.1088/2041-8205/730/1/L7