This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Close this notification
American Astronomical Society logo

Click here to close this overlay, or press the "Escape" key on your keyboard.

The American Astronomical Society (AAS), established in 1899 and based in Washington, DC, is the major organization of professional astronomers in North America. Its membership of about 7,000 individuals also includes physicists, mathematicians, geologists, engineers, and others whose research and educational interests lie within the broad spectrum of subjects comprising contemporary astronomy. The mission of the AAS is to enhance and share humanity's scientific understanding of the universe.

https://aas.org/

Institute of Physics logo

Click here to close this overlay, or press the "Escape" key on your keyboard.

The Institute of Physics (IOP) is a leading scientific society promoting physics and bringing physicists together for the benefit of all. It has a worldwide membership of around 50 000 comprising physicists from all sectors, as well as those with an interest in physics. It works to advance physics research, application and education; and engages with policy makers and the public to develop awareness and understanding of physics. Its publishing company, IOP Publishing, is a world leader in professional scientific communications.

https://www.iop.org

A publishing partnership

RUSTY OLD STARS: A SOURCE OF THE MISSING INTERSTELLAR IRON?

, , , , , , , and

Published 2010 June 18 © 2010. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, ,

2041-8205/717/2/L92

Abstract

Iron, the universe's most abundant refractory element, is highly depleted in both circumstellar and interstellar environments, meaning it exists in solid form. The nature of this solid is unknown. In this Letter, we provide evidence that metallic iron grains are present around oxygen-rich asymptotic giant branch stars, where it is observationally manifest as a featureless mid-infrared excess. This identification is made using Spitzer Space Telescope observations of evolved globular cluster stars, where iron dust production appears ubiquitous and in some cases can be modeled as the only observed dust product. In this context, FeO is examined as the likely carrier for the 20 μm feature observed in some of these stars. Metallic iron appears to be an important part of the dust condensation sequence at low metallicity, and subsequently plays an influential role in the interstellar medium. We explore the stellar metallicities and luminosities at which iron formation is observed, and how the presence of iron affects the outflow and its chemistry. The conditions under which iron can provide sufficient opacity to drive a wind remain unclear.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. INTRODUCTION

Iron is the sixth most abundant element in the universe, and the most abundant refractory element. It is observed to be highly depleted in both interstellar and circumstellar environments (Savage & Bohlin 1979; Maas et al. 2005; Delgado Inglada et al. 2009), and must therefore predominantly exist in an unknown solid form. Iron may be incorporated in other dust grains, primarily silicates, though these are usually iron-poor (Gail & Sedlmayr 1999; Kemper et al. 2002). Alternatively, iron may form a metallic condensate (Kemper et al. 2002; Verhoelst et al. 2009).

Dust grains form around evolved stars by condensation from the gas phase, either directly, or onto molecular "seeds". Individual dust species can usually be identified by distinct infrared emission bands. In oxygen-rich environments, amorphous or crystalline forms of silicates, spinels, and corundum are observed to form, while carbon-rich environments give rise to amorphous carbon (amC), graphite, and SiC. Metallic iron grains, however, produce featureless infrared emission which can be difficult to differentiate from other sources, particularly amorphous carbon dust. Iron has hitherto only been inferred as a likely component of oxygen-rich dusty winds (Kemper et al. 2002; Verhoelst et al. 2009), but never positively identified.

Previous observational studies (McDonald et al. 2009; Boyer et al. 2009) of giant stars in globular clusters have found a featureless contribution in addition to the flux emanating from the star's photosphere, which has been attributed to an unidentified circumstellar dust species. We herein show that this dust species is metallic iron.

2. EVIDENCE FOR DUST EMISSION

2.1. Observations

Our sample consists of 35 highly evolved, (strongly) pulsating stars in globular clusters (Sloan et al. 2010, Paper I), observed using the Spitzer Space Telescope Infrared Spectrograph (IRS). These long-period variable stars lie near or above the red giant branch tips of 19 Galactic globular clusters, which range in metallicity from [Fe/H] = –1.62 to –0.10. Observed with Spitzer's low-resolution modules, the spectra cover λ = 5.2–38 μm with a resolving power of R ~ 60–120.

One carbon-rich star (Lyngå 7 V1) is discounted, leaving a sample of 34 stars. Of these, silicate features at 10 and 20 μm are seen in 24 objects, implying oxygen-rich chemistry. More pertinently, the remaining 10 stars either have very weak silicate features or appear to be "naked".

JHKL-band light curves are also available (Paper I) for 25 of our 34 objects, which allows us to construct the photometric fluxes of these objects at the pulsation phase of their IRS spectrum.

Figure 1 shows the L−[8] color for these objects, where the 8 μm photometry was derived by convolving the IRS spectrum with the Spitzer IRAC 8 μm filter. A truly naked photosphere should have L − [8] ≈ 0, once interstellar reddening has been taken into account7 (cf. Boyer et al. 2008). All 25 stars, however, have a positive color. This implies a flux excess at 8 μm which cannot be caused by commonly assumed dust species (silicates, alumina) under normal conditions of temperature and grain size. This excess flux at long wavelengths is confirmed by comparison to marcs photospheric model spectra (Gustafsson et al. 1975, 2008; McDonald et al. 2009) as shown below.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Extinction-corrected L − [8] colors in our sources. Plus signs show stars with pure iron dust, filled circles show stars also hosting silicate dust (symbol size is proportional to strength of emission). Crosses show stars exhibiting a strong 20 μm feature. Color does not vary significantly with E(BV), showing that this is not merely a reddening effect.

Standard image High-resolution image Export PowerPoint slide

From our sample, four example stars have been selected for detailed modeling: NGC 5927 V3, a highly evolved asymptotic giant branch (AGB) star with a strong, narrow, 10 μm silicate feature; NGC 6352 V5, a less luminous giant star with unusual dust features; and NGC 362 V2 and NGC 5139 V42, "naked" RGB-tip or AGB stars showing optical TiO bands (indicating they are oxygen-rich) and infrared dust excesses, but no silicate features (Smith et al. 1999; McDonald et al. 2009; Boyer et al. 2009).

2.2. Fitting the Observations

For a dust-free comparison, we use a stellar atmosphere model created using the marcs code (Gustafsson et al. 1975, 2008) at 3500 K, [Fe/H] = –1.0, [α/Fe] = +0.3 (see McDonald et al. 2009 for details of these models). Being very similar objects near the giant branch tip, we expect the effective surface temperature below the dust-producing zone to be 3750 ±~250 K. We use the near-infrared flux to fit the photospheric continuum. A low-temperature, metal-rich model therefore represents an intentional bias toward a model with a more-luminous infrared spectrum compared to its near-infrared flux. This reduces the calculated excess to rule out disparity between the modeled and real photospheric spectra.

Figure 2 shows the observed spectra, alongside fits to the stellar wind contribution using dusty (Nenkova et al. 1999). Using the marcs model atmosphere as an input, we fit a stellar wind model using metallic iron grains (Ordal et al. 1988). For each model, we assume a radiatively driven wind; and a standard Mathis–Rumpl–Nordsieck grain size distribution (Mathis et al. 1977), given by n(a) = aq, q = 3.5 for a = 5–250 nm.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. Modeled dust contributions (solid lines) to Spitzer IRS spectra (black dots) and JHKL photometry (black pluses), which has been corrected to the pulsation phases of the IRS spectra. The dashed line is a marcs model denoting the photospheric contribution. The bottom two panels include the extra indicated contributions from Al2O3, silicates, and FeO (dotted lines).

Standard image High-resolution image Export PowerPoint slide

We correct for interstellar reddening using the absorption profiles from McClure (2009). We further assume that AV = 3.2E(BV) and that AV/AK = 7.75. E(BV) values for NGC 362, 5927, and 6352 are from Harris (1996), E(BV) = 0.10 is assumed for ω Cen, based on Harris (1996) and McDonald et al. (2009). The correction applied is thus quite small and negligibly different from that applied in Paper I.

NGC 362 V2 and ω Cen V42 are best fit with a dust shell truncated to an outer radius (router) of ~100 times the inner radius (rinner= the dust formation radius). (Normally, fits are extended to router/rinner gsim 1000.) This suppresses the flux at λ>30 μm. A similar effect can also be achieved by using a grain distribution with fewer large grains: both effects may be in play (we only model a truncated shell here). The strength, and indeed existence of, this suppression depends crucially on the subtraction of the infrared background (caused by Galactic interstellar medium and other cluster objects). While every effort has been made to make sure this has been done correctly, we cannot be conclusively sure that such a suppression and thus truncation exist.

In NGC 5927 V3 and NGC 6352 V5, we also observe other dust species, which emit at λ>8 μm. Identified species include silicates (magnesium-rich olivines and pyroxenes) at 10 and 20 μm and amorphous alumina (Al2O3) at 11–15 μm (optical constants from Draine & Lee 1984; Begemann et al. 1997). Related crystalline minerals with a smaller degree of amorphization are likely responsible for the sharp 9.6 and 13.1 μm features seen in NGC 6352 V5 (Sloan et al. 2003). Note that the fit to NGC 5927 V3 produces a fairly good match to the 10 μm feature, but at a wavelength which is too red. This can be caused by a number of factors, including grain size and porosity (Voshchinnikov & Henning 2008). The 20 μm feature has an unknown carrier: a promising candidate is magnesio-wüstite (MgxFe1−xO; see, e.g., Posch et al. 2002; Lebzelter et al. 2006; Paper I). This provides a good fit to the feature in NGC 6352 V5. The comparatively red peak wavelength seen in NGC 6352 V5 further suggests that x ≈ 0; i.e., that it is near-pure FeO (Henning et al. 1995). We return to this feature later.

We could not fit a single-temperature dust model to these two stars, implying that the dust species are not in thermal contact with each other. Iron and alumina were fit at temperatures of ~1000 K. In NGC 6352 V5, silicates and FeO were fit at ~450 K; in NGC 5927 V3, the strong 10 μm peak suggests mainly glassy silicates, which we fit at ~400 K.

Table 1 lists our fitted parameters, including dust temperatures at the outer and inner edges of the dust envelope (Touter, Tinner) and the size of the envelope used (router/rinner, rinner ~ 2 R*). We do not include mass-loss rates, as explained at the end of this section.

Table 1. Parameters of dusty Models Presented in Figure 2.

Parameter NGC 362 V2 ω Cen V42 NGC 5927 V3 NGC 6352 V5
Assumed luminosity (L) 1826 1862 2000 2000
Assumed [Fe/H] −1.16 −1.62 −0.37 −0.70
Assumed E(BV) 0.05 0.10 0.45 0.21
References 1, 3 2 4 4
Wind component     $\overbrace{\qquad \quad \qquad }$ $\overbrace{\qquad \quad \quad \qquad }$
      A B A B
Composition 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% Fe 70% Silicate
  Iron Iron Iron Silicate 4% Al2O3 30% FeO
Tinner dust envelope edge (K) 800 1000 1100 400 1000 450
Touter dust envelope edge (K) 194 173  ⋅⋅⋅   ⋅⋅⋅   ⋅⋅⋅   ⋅⋅⋅ 
router/rinner 50 120 1000 1000 100 100
Optical depth at 0.55 μm 0.28 0.70 0.55 0.45 1.05 0.12

References. (1) Boyer et al. 2009; (2) McDonald et al. 2009; (3) E(BV) from Harris 1996; (4) luminosity estimated, metallicity from Harris 1996.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

2.3. Alternative Sources of Excess

Featureless infrared excess can be produced by a variety of circumstellar material. This can take the form of free–free emission, emission from shells of molecular gas (a "molsphere"; e.g., Tsuji 2000), extremely large silicate grains, or amorphous carbon grains. Figure 3 shows modeled fits for these possible emission sources, modeled in an identical way to the iron fits listed above.

Figure 3.

Figure 3. Fits to the Spitzer IRS spectrum of ω Cen V42 using alternative emission sources. In each panel, the following is shown—dots: IRS spectrum; plus sign: phase-corrected L-band photometry; dotted line: fit for indicated grain composition or emission mechanism.

Standard image High-resolution image Export PowerPoint slide

Ionization in a chromosphere or shock fronts propagating through the outer atmosphere can give rise to free–free emission, as observed by radio observations toward Galactic Miras (Reid & Menten 1997). The optical depth of free–free emission in a region of thickness r can be calculated as

Equation (1)

where the electron density, ne, is recoverable from the electron temperature, Te, via the Saha equation. At low frequencies, where τν Gt 1, the emission scales as Fν ∝ ν−2 for an isothermal, isobaric region; and Fν ∝ ν−0.6 for an isothermal wind expanding with constant velocity. For ω Cen V42, we find our spectrum would require τν = 1 at 3–4 μm, and that Fν ∝ ν−1.6 for τν Gt 1. This more-closely approximates an isobaric density profile, which would be difficult to achieve in an expanding wind. Very similar conditions would have to exist in all 34 of our stars, as the shape of their spectra are very similar.

An isobaric chromosphere producing a spectrum with this optical depth cannot exist except in the following case: the wind must be mostly ionized (gsim6000 K) and either the chromosphere extends to an unphysical radius (gsim70 R) and/or the mass-loss rate becomes unphysical (gsim10−5.5M yr−1) for a thermally expanding wind. Departing from an isobaric state makes conditions even more prohibitive. While chromospheres may be present in these stars, this infrared excess is not seen in chromospherically active stars that are less evolved (McDonald & van Loon 2007; Boyer et al. 2009). In V42, circumstellar ionization appears dominated by pulsation shocks. Reid & Menten (1997) show that, for Galactic Miras, the temperature and density increases provided by shocks in the outer atmosphere are insufficient to produce an ionized layer that would be optically thick in the infrared. We thus rule out free–free emission as a dominant contributor to our spectra.

The molsphere creates a dense "forest" of molecular lines. Water lines are the most important, and cause emission throughout the spectrum, but mainly in the 6–8 μm and >20 μm regions. This emission is seen in some of our example stars (Paper I). However, the water bands in our spectra are very weak compared to stars with naked molspheres (e.g., β Peg— Tsuji et al. 1997). Gas-phase model emission spectra (Figure 3), created from the line list of Partridge & Schwenke (1997) using SpectraFactory8 (Cami et al. 2010), fail to reproduce the flatness of the spectrum for any reasonable combination of temperature and column density. Figure 3 shows the highest column density we consider feasible, and even this contains ~10−7M of water or ~0.01% of the star's oxygen. Furthermore, most molsphere host stars still require an extra opacity source (such as iron grains) providing flux at 6–8 μm (Verhoelst et al. 2009). Infrared molecular emission should therefore not make a significant contribution to our spectra.

Of the commonly considered dust species only metallic iron and amC produce a featureless infrared continuum that matches the observed "naked" spectra. Other dust species (e.g., graphite) produce either strong spectral features or inflections which do not fit observed spectra. Spectral features can be damped by unusual conditions, notably exceptionally large grains (Höfner 2008): these cannot simultaneously reproduce both the excess at λ < 8 μm and λ>20 μm at the observed levels (Figure 3) and are not expected in metal-poor stars where grain growth may be hampered by a lack of constituent elements.

Observationally, amC can also provide an acceptable fit to our example stars over most of the spectrum. The remaining discrepancies may be fixable by fine-tuning the wind parameters (grain size, density distributions, temperatures, background subtraction, etc.). Detection of amC as dominant dust species in an oxygen-rich environment would be unexpected. In giant stars, carbon and oxygen are bound into CO near the stellar surface, locking away the least abundant element. The remaining majority element, either carbon or oxygen, dominates the dust chemistry. CO may be dissociated in atmospheric shock waves or by chromospheric UV irradiation (Beck et al. 1992). This can lead to the production of small amounts of other carbon-rich molecules: mainly CO2 (observed in our stars: see Paper I), but also HCN and CS (Duari et al. 1999). Small quantities of carbon-rich dust may then form (Höfner & Andersen 2007), though oxygen-rich dust production is still expected to be dominant. In our sample, however, the featureless component often appears to be the dominant species, and no evidence for oxygen-rich dust is found.

Having ruled out the alternatives, we conclude that the source of the dust excess must be iron grains, and that these must dominate the condensed material in some stars. If we naïvely assume identical populations of spherical grains, the fraction of warm silicates in the "naked" stars being lesssim1% of the iron content (Figure 3; the same would be true at a lesssim3% level for an amC component). The silicate fraction may increase if iron grains are made smaller and oblate, thus presenting a higher cross section per unit mass: extreme needle-like grains are required if silicates are to become the dominant dust species by mass. As we do not know the grain shape, it becomes difficult to estimate a mass-loss rate for an iron wind. Spherical grains produce unfeasibly low expansion velocities of order ~m s−1 for a pure iron wind; expansion velocities for NGC 5927 V3 and NGC 6352 V5 were not calculated as the model assumes a zero initial velocity for both temperature components, which will not be the case if they form at different radii. The mass-loss rates and expansion velocities can also be significantly modified by altering, e.g., the grain size or density (single crystal versus conglomerate), but reasonable changes still fail to produce feasible values, except for extremely elongated grains.

This implies that iron alone may not be able to drive a dusty wind in these stars. Other factors may also accelerate the wind. These could include small amounts of amorphous carbon (Höfner & Andersen 2007); energy deposition either from shocks created by stellar pulsations (Bowen 1988), or magnetic reconnection (Pijpers & Hearn 1989); increased opacity from circumstellar molecular gas (Elitzur et al. 1989); stellar pulsation, either by direct acceleration or dissipation of shocks; or line-driving of H i or Ca ii atoms, or H2O molecules (e.g., Elitzur et al. 1989; Bowen 1989). The driving mechanism is thus likely to be complex, with radiation pressure on metallic iron being only one of several accelerants which drive matter from the star. Obtaining an accurate radial profile of the wind's outflow velocity will be crucial in determining which factors dominate this acceleration.

3. DISCUSSION

3.1. The Fate of Iron and Iron-oxide Grains

Efficient production of metallic iron by oxygen-rich AGB stars would explain several iron depletions. Gas-phase depletion of iron extends to the interstellar medium (Savage & Bohlin 1979). Iron grains contribute to infrared emission from this medium (Chlewicki & Laureijs 1988) and iron is seen to be destroyed in shocks (Lebouteiller et al. 2008). Iron is also depleted by >90% in the gas phase of planetary nebulae (Delgado Inglada et al. 2009). Direct evidence for iron condensation in AGB winds comes from depletion patterns in binary post-AGB stars. In these stars, the wind is captured in a circumbinary disk, from where gas re-accretes onto the star. These stars show large depletions of refractory elements, with iron being among the most depleted (Maas et al. 2005) thus indicate a history of iron-rich dust production.

The 20 μm feature, seen in NGC 6352 V5, is also observed in NGC 5927 V1 and Terzan 5 V6. It has a width (FWHM) of ~3μm and a line-to-continuum ratio up to 50%. This feature has previously been seen in low mass-loss stars; it correlates with the presence of an 11 μm shoulder, and 13.1 and 28 μm peaks (Little-Marenin & Little 1988; Sloan et al. 2003). The related peaks are also present in our sample, and we confirm that the 20 μm feature disappears for more evolved (i.e., more luminous) stars. The 20 μm and associated features are barely detectable in the naked stars, strongest in stars with weak silicate emission and disappear when silicates dominate (Figure 4). This suggests they are produced either during the formation or destruction of silicate grains. The identification of the feature with MgxFe1−xO is unconfirmed mainly because it does not predict the associated features, but the proposed identifications for those (corundum, pyroxenes; Sloan et al. 2003) do not provide good fits at 20 μm, making it plausible that a range of minerals form under these conditions. We suggest that these features may be caused by the chemical modification of silicate grains: silicate grains which adsorb iron into the lattice have higher opacity, and can be heated until the iron-bearing component dissociates from the grain (Woitke 2006). This is expected to occur at any radius from the star at which dust formation is efficient (Gail & Sedlmayr 1999). In this model, metallic iron is produced first, but at higher metallicity and mass-loss rates, the iron becomes partly incorporated into other grain types including iron-oxide and iron-containing silicates.

Figure 4.

Figure 4. Variation of dust properties with bolometric magnitude and metallicity. Symbols as shown in Figure 1.

Standard image High-resolution image Export PowerPoint slide

Studies of inclusions within meteoric primitive solar system material have traced dust grains to specific origins in AGB stars, supernovae and novae, through their isotopic ratios (Zinner 2003; Messenger et al. 2005). Recently, the first pre-solar iron-oxide grain has been identified (Floss et al. 2008). The iron and oxygen isotopic ratios in it are indicative of an origin in an AGB star. This supports the hypothesis that AGB stars are a source of interstellar iron dust, and have contributed to the solar system's iron content.

3.2. The Dust Condensation Sequence at low [Fe/H]

Figure 4 shows the variation of dust types (see Paper I) with bolometric magnitude and metallicity. Silicate-rich winds are only seen at high luminosity or high metallicity, with iron dominating the outflow in lower-luminosity, lower-metallicity stars. This indicates that the dust condensation sequence depends on metallicity and luminosity. Gail & Sedlmayr (1999) show that, under equilibrium conditions, iron is only expected to condense before silicates in regions with high gas pressure. If this applies to our stars, it implies high gas pressure at low metallicity and/or low luminosity, as may be expected if the outflow velocities where iron condenses (at the outside edge of the molsphere) are very low. Under non-equilibrium conditions, grain growth chemistry is strongly controlled by kinetics (Tachibana et al. 2009), which may favor the formation of iron.

In Gail & Sedlmayr (1999), silicates form before iron at lower densities and temperatures. The restriction of silicates toward higher metallicity and luminosity (Figure 4) suggests that their circumstellar envelopes are more extended, favoring silicates. Silicate production is expected to increase with both stellar metallicity and luminosity (van Loon 2000).

4. CONCLUSIONS

Using mid-infrared spectra and photometry, we have shown that there is a considerable amount of unattributed infrared flux in a large selection of globular cluster giants. Through radiative transfer modeling, we deduce that this flux is most likely due to metallic iron grains forming in a truncated stellar wind, corroborated by a potential identification of FeO with the 20 μm emission feature. The production of metallic iron seems to become more dominant at lower metallicity, suggesting that the dust condensation sequence is fundamentally different in metal-poor objects. Large-scale production of iron grains and iron oxide in AGB stars can explain iron depletion in the gas and solid phases of the post-AGB stars and planetary nebulae; as well as isotopic ratios in FeO grains in meteorites. While iron increases opacity in oxygen-rich winds, it remains unclear whether it can dominate the driving of metal-poor winds. Future observations to determine outflow velocities in these stars should help determine the driver of these stellar winds.

This Letter uses observations made using the Spitzer Space Telescope, operated by JPL, California Institute of Technology under NASA contract 1407 and supported by NASA through JPL (contract number 1257184). We thank Martha Boyer for her helpful comments.

Footnotes

References

  • Beck, H. K. B., Gail, H., Henkel, R., & Sedlmayr, E. 1992, A&A, 265, 626

    ADS

  • Begemann, B., Dorschner, J., Henning, T., Mutschke, H., Guertler, J., Koempe, C., & Nass, R. 1997, ApJ, 476, 199

    IOPscienceADS

  • Bowen, G. H. 1988, Pulsation and Mass Loss in Stars, ed. R. Stalio & L. A. Willson (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 3, Astrophys. Space Sci. Lib. 148

    Crossref

  • Bowen, G. H. 1989, Evolution of Peculiar Red Giant Stars (IAU Colloq. 106), ed. H. R. Johnson & B. Zuckerman (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 269

    ADS

  • Boyer, M. L., McDonald, I., van Loon, J. T., Woodward, C. E., Gehrz, R. D., Evans, A., & Dupree, A. K. 2008, AJ, 135, 1395

    IOPscienceADS

  • Boyer, M. L. et al. 2009, ApJ, 705, 746

    IOPscienceADS

  • Cami, J., van Malderen, R., & Markwick, A. J. 2010, ApJS, 187, 409

    IOPscienceADS

  • Chlewicki, G. & Laureijs, R. J. 1988, A&A, 207, L11

    ADS

  • Delgado Inglada, G., Rodríguez, M., Mampaso, A., & Viironen, K. 2009, ApJ, 694, 1335

    IOPscienceADS

  • Draine, B. T. & Lee, H. M. 1984, ApJ, 285, 89

    CrossrefADS

  • Duari, D., Cherchneff, I., & Willacy, K. 1999, A&A, 341, L47

    ADS

  • Elitzur, M., Brown, J. A., & Johnson, H. R. 1989, ApJ, 341, L95

    CrossrefADS

  • Flaherty, K. M., Pipher, J. L., Megeath, S. T., Winston, E. M., Gutermuth, R. A., Muzerolle, J., Allen, L. E., & Fazio, G. G. 2007, ApJ, 663, 1069

    IOPscienceADS

  • Floss, C., Stadermann, F. J., & Bose, M. 2008, ApJ, 672, 1266

    IOPscienceADS

  • Gail, H. & Sedlmayr, E. 1999, A&A, 347, 594

    ADS

  • Gustafsson, B., Bell, R. A., Eriksson, K., & Nordlund, A. 1975, A&A, 42, 407

    ADS

  • Gustafsson, B., Edvardsson, B., Eriksson, K., Jørgensen, U. G., Nordlund, Å., & Plez, B. 2008, A&A, 486, 951

    CrossrefADS

  • Harris, W. E. 1996, ApJ, 112, 1487

    CrossrefADS

  • Henning, T., Begemann, B., Mutschke, H., & Dorschner, J. 1995, A&AS, 112, 143

    ADS

  • Höfner, S. 2008, A&A, 491, L1

    CrossrefADS

  • Höfner, S. & Andersen, A. C. 2007, A&A, 465, L39

    CrossrefADS

  • Kemper, F., de Koter, A., Waters, L. B. F. M., Bouwman, J., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 2002, A&A, 384, 585

    CrossrefADS

  • Lebouteiller, V., Bernard-Salas, J., Brandl, B., Whelan, D. G., Wu, Y., Charmandaris, V., Devost, D., & Houck, J. R. 2008, ApJ, 680, 398

    IOPscienceADS

  • Lebzelter, T., Posch, T., Hinkle, K., Wood, P. R., & Bouwman, J. 2006, ApJ, 653, L145

    IOPscienceADS

  • Little-Marenin, I. R. & Little, S. J. 1988, ApJ, 333, 305

    CrossrefADS

  • Maas, T., Van Winckel, H., & Lloyd Evans, T. 2005, A&A, 429, 297

    CrossrefADS

  • Mathis, J. S., Rumpl, W., & Nordsieck, K. H. 1977, ApJ, 217, 425

    CrossrefADS

  • McClure, M. 2009, ApJ, 693, L81

    IOPscienceADS

  • McDonald, I. & van Loon, J. T. 2007, A&A, 476, 1261

    CrossrefADS

  • McDonald, I., van Loon, J. T., Decin, L., Boyer, M. L., Dupree, A. K., Evans, A., Gehrz, R. D., & Woodward, C. E. 2009, MNRAS, 394, 831

    CrossrefADS

  • Messenger, S., Keller, L. P., & Lauretta, D. S. 2005, Science, 309, 737

    CrossrefADSPubMed

  • Nenkova, M., Ivezić, Ž., & Elitzur, M. 1999, Thermal Emission Spectroscopy and Analysis of Dust, Disks, and Regoliths (LPI Contrib. 969), ed. A. Sprague, D. K. Lynch, & M. Sitko (Houston, TX: Lunar and Planetary Institute), 20

    ADS

  • Ordal, M. A., Bell, R. J., Alexander, R. W., Jr., Newquist, L. A., & Querry, M. R. 1988, Appl. Opt., 27, 1203

    CrossrefADSPubMed

  • Partridge, H. & Schwenke, D. W. 1997, J. Chem. Phys, 106, 4618

    CrossrefADS

  • Pijpers, F. P. & Hearn, A. G. 1989, A&A, 209, 198

    ADS

  • Posch, T., Kerschbaum, F., Mutschke, H., Dorschner, J., & Jäger, C. 2002, A&A, 393, L7

    CrossrefADS

  • Reid, M. J. & Menten, K. M. 1997, ApJ, 476, 327

    IOPscienceADS

  • Savage, B. D. & Bohlin, R. C. 1979, ApJ, 229, 136

    CrossrefADS

  • Sloan, G. C., Kraemer, K. E., Goebel, J. H., & Price, S. D. 2003, ApJ, 594, 483

    IOPscienceADS

  • Sloan, G. C. et al. 2010, ApJ, submitted (Paper I)
  • Smith, V. V., Shetrone, M. D., & Keane, M. J. 1999, ApJ, 516, L73

    IOPscienceADS

  • Tachibana, S., Nagahara, H., Ozawa, K., Tamada, S., & Ogawa, R. 2009, Lunar and Planetary Institute Science Conference Abstracts (Lunar and Planetary Inst. Tech. Rep. 40), 2512

    ADS

  • Tsuji, T. 2000, ApJ, 540, L99

    IOPscienceADS

  • Tsuji, T., Ohnaka, K., Aoki, W., & Yamamura, I. 1997, A&A, 320, L1

    ADS

  • van Loon, J. T. 2000, A&A, 354, 125

    ADS

  • Verhoelst, T., van der Zypen, N., Hony, S., Decin, L., Cami, J., & Eriksson, K. 2009, A&A, 498, 127

    CrossrefADS

  • Voshchinnikov, N. V. & Henning, T. 2008, A&A, 483, L9

    CrossrefADS

  • Whittet, D. C. B. 1992, Dust in the Galactic Environment (Bristol: Institute of Physics Publishing)

    CrossrefADS

  • Woitke, P. 2006, A&A, 460, L9

    CrossrefADS

  • Zinner, E. K. 2003, Treatise on Geochemistry, Vol. 1, ed. A. M. Davis (Amsterdam: Elsevier), 17

    ADS

Export references: BibTeX RIS

Citations

  1. The State-of-Play of Anomalous Microwave Emission (AME) research
    Clive Dickinson et al 2018 New Astronomy Reviews 80 1

    Crossref

  2. Near-infrared Stellar Populations in the Metal-poor, Dwarf Irregular Galaxies Sextans A and Leo A
    Olivia C. Jones et al. 2018 The Astrophysical Journal 854 117

    IOPscience

  3. Photochemistry of Fe:H2O Adducts in Argon Matrices: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study in the mid-IR and UV-Visible Regions
    Vincent Deguin et al 2017 The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 

    Crossref

  4. Proteomic analyses of the cyanobacterium Arthrospira ( Spirulina ) platensis under iron and salinity stress
    Mostafa M.S. Ismaiel et al 2017 Environmental and Experimental Botany 

    Crossref

  5. Heavy metal pollutants in selected organs of African giant rats from three agro-ecological zones of Nigeria: evidence for their role as an environmental specimen bank
    Ifukibot Levi Usende et al 2017 Environmental Science and Pollution Research 

    Crossref

  6. Variations in the Infrared Spectra of Wüstite with Defects and Disorder
    C. Koike et al. 2017 The Astrophysical Journal 845 115

    IOPscience

  7. Characterizing the Population of Bright Infrared Sources in the Small Magellanic Cloud
    K. E. Kraemer et al. 2017 The Astrophysical Journal 834 185

    IOPscience

  8. A study of iron and dust in the supernova remnant IC 443
    Takuma Kokusho et al 2015 Planetary and Space Science 116 92

    Crossref

  9. ALMA reveals sunburn: CO dissociation around AGB stars in the globular cluster 47 Tucanae
    I. McDonald et al 2015 Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 453 4325

    Crossref

  10. Identification of a Class of Low-mass Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars Struggling to Become Carbon Stars in the Magellanic Clouds
    Martha L. Boyer et al. 2015 The Astrophysical Journal 810 116

    IOPscience

  11. Circumstellar Dust around AGB Stars and Implications for Infrared Emission from Galaxies
    Alexa Villaume et al. 2015 The Astrophysical Journal 806 82

    IOPscience

  12. Zinc abundances of planetary nebulae
    C. L. Smith et al 2014 Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 441 3161

    Crossref

  13. Modelling the alumina abundance of oxygen-rich evolved stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud
    O. C. Jones et al 2014 Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 

    Crossref

  14. VISTA variables in the Sagittarius dwarf spheroidal galaxy: pulsation-versus dust-driven winds on the giant branches
    I. McDonald et al 2014 Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 

    Crossref

  15. Mid-infrared interferometric observations of four oxygen-rich Mira variables
    I. Karovicova et al 2013 EAS Publications Series 63 191

    Crossref

  16. New insights into the dust formation of oxygen-rich AGB stars
    I. Karovicova et al 2013 Astronomy & Astrophysics 560 A75

    Crossref

  17. Period – mass-loss rate relation of Miras with and without technetium
    S. Uttenthaler 2013 Astronomy & Astrophysics 556 A38

    Crossref

  18. Dust input from AGB stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud
    S. Zhukovska and T. Henning 2013 Astronomy & Astrophysics 555 A99

    Crossref

  19. n the Origins of GEMS Grains: Reply to the Comment by J. P. Bradley
    Lindsay P. Keller and Scott Messenger 2013 Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 

    Crossref

  20. The origin of dust in galaxies in the Herschel and ALMA era
    H. Gomez and M. Matsuura 2012 Astronomy & Geophysics 53 6.19

    Crossref

  21. Fundamental parameters and infrared excesses of Hipparcos stars
    I. McDonald et al 2012 Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 427 343

    Crossref

  22. Carbon enrichment of the evolved stars in the Sagittarius dwarf spheroidal
    I. McDonald et al 2012 Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 427 2647

    Crossref

  23. Exploring wind-driving dust species in cool luminous giants
    S. Bladh and S. Höfner 2012 Astronomy & Astrophysics 546 A76

    Crossref

  24. Dust and molecular shells in asymptotic giant branch stars
    R. Zhao-Geisler et al 2012 Astronomy & Astrophysics 545 A56

    Crossref

  25. Infrared excess around nearby red giant branch stars and Reimers law
    M. A. T. Groenewegen 2012 Astronomy and Astrophysics 540 A32

    Crossref

  26. The Submillimeter and Millimeter Excess of the Small Magellanic Cloud: Magnetic Dipole Emission from Magnetic Nanoparticles?
    B. T. Draine and Brandon Hensley 2012 The Astrophysical Journal 757 103

    IOPscience

  27. The Dust Budget of the Small Magellanic Cloud: Are Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars the Primary Dust Source at Low Metallicity?
    M. L. Boyer et al. 2012 The Astrophysical Journal 748 40

    IOPscience

  28. COMMISSION 35: STELLAR CONSTITUTION
    Corinne Charbonnel et al 2011 Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 7 161

    Crossref

  29. Spitzer spectra of evolved stars in ω Centauri and their low-metallicity dust production : Dust production in ω Centauri
    I. McDonald et al 2011 Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society no

    Crossref

  30. Long period variables and mass loss in the globular clusters NGC 362 and NGC 2808
    T. Lebzelter and P. R. Wood 2011 Astronomy and Astrophysics 529 A137

    Crossref

  31. Fundamental Parameters, Integrated Red Giant Branch Mass Loss, and Dust Production in the Galactic Globular Cluster 47 Tucanae
    I. McDonald et al. 2011 The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 193 23

    IOPscience

  32. A Temporal Study of the Oxygen-rich Pulsating Variable Asymptotic Giant Branch Star, T Cep: Investigation on Dust Formation and Dust Properties
    Suklima Guha Niyogi et al. 2011 The Astrophysical Journal 733 93

    IOPscience

  33. Dust Production and Mass Loss in the Galactic Globular Cluster 47 Tucanae
    I. McDonald et al. 2011 The Astrophysical Journal 730 71

    IOPscience

  34. The Identification of Probable SiS Emission at 13-14 μm in Spectra of Galactic S Stars
    G. C. Sloan et al. 2011 The Astrophysical Journal 729 121

    IOPscience

  35. The SAGE-Spec Spitzer Legacy programme: the life-cycle of dust and gas in the Large Magellanic Cloud - Point source classification I : SAGE-Spec - Point source classification I
    Paul M. Woods et al 2010 Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society no

    Crossref

  36. The Spitzer Atlas of Stellar Spectra (SASS)
    David R. Ardila et al. 2010 The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 191 301

    IOPscience

  37. Spitzer Spectroscopy of Mass-loss and Dust Production by Evolved Stars in Globular Clusters
    G. C. Sloan et al. 2010 The Astrophysical Journal 719 1274

    IOPscience

Export citations: BibTeX RIS