This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
The following article is Open access

Transition from quantitative to geometric tomography

, and

Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd
, , Citation Z Saghi et al 2008 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 126 012063 DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/126/1/012063

1742-6596/126/1/012063

Abstract

Electron tomography allows the three-dimensional (3D) quantitative characterization of nanostructures, provided a monotonic relationship is fulfilled between the projected signal and the atomic number and thickness of the specimen. This requirement is not satisfied if the micrographs are affected by (i) diffraction contrast, (ii) absorption-thickness limit or (iii) detector saturation. The effects of non-monotonic tomography acquisition have been examined using computer simulations and experimental tilt series of conical tungsten tips. It is shown that the reconstruction artefacts arising from non-linearity can be best predicted by considering geometric tomography (which reconstructs the object external shape) and quantitative tomography (which reconstructs the 3D density function) as limiting cases.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Please wait… references are loading.
10.1088/1742-6596/126/1/012063