Abstract
We study the static behavior of a gas of atoms held in a one-dimensional lattice where two distinct electronically high-lying Rydberg states are simultaneously excited by laser light. We focus on a situation where interactions of van-der-Waals type take place only among atoms that are in the same Rydberg state. We analytically investigate at first the so-called classical limit of vanishing laser driving strength. We show that the system exhibits a surprisingly complex ground state structure with a sequence of compatible to incompatible transitions. The incompatibility between the species leads to mutual frustration, a feature which pertains also in the quantum regime. We perform an analytical and numerical investigation of these features and present an approximative description of the system in terms of a Rokhsar–Kivelson Hamiltonian which permits the analytical understanding of the frustration effects even beyond the classical limit.
Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
1. Introduction
Atoms in highly excited states—so-called Rydberg atoms—interact via power-law potentials, which in conjunction with an external laser drive give rise to intricate many-body phenomena. Recent experiments with Rydberg gases have revealed that the dynamical behavior of these systems is of surprising variety. Examples are the emergence of bistable behavior [1, 2], the observation of correlated aggregation of excitations [3] and of coherent excitation transport [4–6]. Strong interactions also become manifest in the structure of the ground state of Rydberg ensembles. Several theoretical works have predicted and studied the formation and the melting of crystalline phases [7–15]. But only recently it was shown that these crystalline states can be actually accessed experimentally [16].
Currently there is a surge of interest in atomic systems in which multiple Rydberg states are excited. One of the main motivations is the presence of an exchange interaction between Rydberg states of different atoms that results in coherent transport dynamics [4–6], the non-local propagation of light [17] as well as a non-trivial collapse and revival dynamics [18, 19]. Interesting physics emerges also in the absence of exchange interactions. The main reason is that depending on the Rydberg states the interaction between two atoms can vary by one or more orders of magnitude [20, 21]. This feature is exploited for example in all-optical transistors for light pulses [22, 23].
In this work we explore the many-body ground states of an atomic lattice gas in which two Rydberg states—or species—are simultaneously excited. We focus on a situation where interactions are present only between atoms of the same species. This is reminiscent of the Potts model [24], for which however only few studies exist that consider interactions that extend beyond nearest neighbors [25–28]. We show that the ground state of the two-species Rydberg lattice gas features a surprisingly complex structure with a series of compatible to incompatible transitions. In the compatible case the two species can occupy the lattice such that they can both minimize their interaction energy independently. In the incompatible case this is not possible and it leads to mutual frustration. We provide analytical expressions for the regions of stability of the (in) compatible phases in the classical regime, i.e. in the limit of vanishing laser driving strength. The quantum regime is studied numerically as well as analytically with the help of an approximate Hamiltonian of Rokhsar–Kivelson (RK) form. These considerations show how frustration persists also in the quantum regime.
2. Description of the system
We consider a one-dimensional gas of atoms trapped in a lattice of spacing a with a single atom per site. The relevant internal level structure of the atoms is shown in figure 1(a). The ground state is coupled to two Rydberg nS-states via two laser fields with Rabi frequencies and detuning . The fundamental interaction between two such atoms is to leading order given by the dipole–dipole potential. However, for Rydberg atoms in nS-states, as considered here, this interaction results in a (second order) van-der-Waals energy shift [20]. For two atoms in the pair state and separated by the distance R it reads The van-der-Waals coefficients scale with the eleventh power of the principal quantum number n [20, 30, 31]. This generates strong interactions among Rydberg states and moreover permits to achieve a scenario in which the interaction between two atoms in the pair-state is much larger than the interaction between two atoms in Henceforth we focus on such a case, which is in practice achieved by choosing the principal quantum number of state (the strong species) to be larger than that of state (the weak species). Moreover, such large difference in the principle quantum numbers results in a strongly suppressed interspecies interactions [32] as experimentally shown in [33]. This is a rather generic feature of Rydberg atoms in the sense that one can find various combinations of suitable levels which satify such strong-weak hierarchy. Identification of these levels is atomic species dependent and the corresponding van-der-Waals coefficients can be calculated using perturbative techniques as described e.g. in [34]. To give an idea of the orders of magnitude of the C6 coefficients and how they depend on the principle quantum number, we provide a typical example in figure 2, where we compare the inter- and intra-species interactions for Rydberg states of rubidium.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageThe Hamiltonian of the system can be written (within the rotating-wave approximation) as the sum of Hamiltonians of the strong and weak species, with
where and and Note, that Hw and Hs do not commute due to the fact that both Rydberg species are excited from a common ground state. This is the origin of the compatible to incompatible transitions as well as the frustration effects which we will discuss in the following.
3. Compatible to incompatible transition
We start by studying the case in the thermodynamic limit, i.e. an infinite lattice, where equation (1) reduces to the Hamiltonian of a classical two-species Potts-model with (convex) interactions and inequivalent couplings (). We are interested in finding the microscopic state which minimizes the interaction energy for given filling fractions of excitations and For a single species and a general convex potential this problem was studied in [29, 35–37]. Given the filling fraction the convexity of the potential forces the system into the most homogeneous configuration achievable accounting for the lattice constraint, as shown by Hubbard in [29].
When two species are present it is in general not possible to minimize at the same time the interaction energy of both. An example is given in figure 1(b) for and Finding the actual ground state is simplified by our assumption Here, the configuration of the s-species can be considered as 'frozen' and not constrained by that of the w-species2 . Atoms of the s-species will then arrange following the single species prescription of [29], that is calling rl the distance between an s-atom and its lth nearest neighbor, the s-atoms will be distributed on the chain with distances satisfying or This set of constrains identifies a unique distribution for the atoms of the s-species, and will in general lead to a deformed lattice formed by the remaining empty sites on which the minimum-energy arrangement of the atoms of the w-species needs to be found.
For the example shown in figure 1(b) the w-atom sitting in the doubly occupied site has to be moved to an empty site in a way that minimizes the increment in interaction energy. As shown in figure 1(c) the strong species leaves a distorted lattice with a density of empty sites given by and lattice spacings a and The minimum interaction energy is then obtained by arranging the w-atoms according to the single species prescription of [29] considering that the filling fraction of the w species on the distorted lattice is This finally leads to the state depicted in figure 1(c). The mathematical proof of this method we provide in a separate publication, see [38]. Some examples of minimum interaction—energy configurations are shown in figure 1(d). From these considerations one finds that two cases, which depend on the filling fractions need to be distinguished: (i) The compatible case in which the two species assume their minimum—energy dispositions independently without interfering with each other. (ii) The incompatible case in which the strong species prevents the atoms of w-species from assuming their minimum energy configuration.
Understanding whether two filling fractions are compatible is generally a hard task which requires the study of the full arrangement of excitations. In the following analytical analysis we will consider filling fractions of the form where both are positive integers. Clearly, the minimum energy configuration is achieved when the α-atoms are arranged uniformly with distance qα. The filling fractions are compatible only if they share a common divisor (see [38]). In the incompatible case the distribution of the w-atoms will be distorted and can be represented by repeated strings of repeated intervals of lengths as shown for the example in figure 1(c).
Let us now turn to the discussion of the stability of the (in) compatible phases. So far we have assumed that the filling fractions of the individual species are externally imposed. However, in practice the filling fraction is controlled by the parameters in Hamiltonian (1) which act as chemical potentials [8, 14]. The question is then which state, or filling fraction, is actually stabilized in a given region of the manifold. As the distribution of the s-species is effectively independent from that of the w-atoms, we can study its stability with the single species method [14, 36, 37]. The stability of a given filling fraction on the other hand is less simple to analyze, as it depends on the configuration of the s-atoms. We can obtain an analytical result for the transition to an incompatible state in the thermodynamic limit starting from a compatible arrangement of atoms for which is integer (see section 6 in [38]). The region of stability is delimited by
On the one hand a transition to an incompatible state takes place when the value of for which the introduction of one more excitation is energetically favorable when keeping fixed. In this case the distribution of the lth nearest neighbor w-atoms which in the compatible phase is homogeneous, e.g. atoms at distance is deformed by the introduction of distances and distances On the other hand there is a transition at at which the w-species loses an excitation and the compatible distribution is deformed by the introduction of distances and distances
4. Quantum fluctuations and frustration energy
We now address the question as to how quantum fluctuations introduced by a laser of finite driving strength affect the compatible to incompatible transitions and in particular the emergence of frustrated states. To this end we consider a non-zero value of This changes the state of the s-species from a classical one to a superposition of configurations with different excitation number. We are interested in how this impacts the classical arrangements of the w-species, i.e. at To quantify this we introduce the frustration energy
which measures by how much the strong species prevents the w-species from reaching its minimum energy configuration if it were alone. Here i.e. the expectation value of Hw (see equation (1)) and is the energy of the classical configuration of the w-species in the absence of s-atoms.
In the classical limit, the frustration energy is zero when the detunings are chosen such that they stabilize filling fractions which are compatible. becomes in general larger with increasing as increasing density fluctuations in the s-species force the w-atoms to assume configurations with increased energy. In order to study this behavior in more detail we diagonalize Hamiltonian (1) for a chain of length L = 8 with periodic boundary conditions. This approach has the typical drawbacks of a small scale numerical study: the presence of finite size effects (though minimized by the periodic boundaries), and the fact that one is limited to filling fractions of the form p/L for We will see, however, that the results provide an intuitive understanding of the physics at work. Note furthermore, that the considered relatively small system size in fact comes close to what is currently realizable experimentally in the context of Rydberg atoms [16, 39].
For our numerical study we focus on a regime where the strong species in the classical limit forms a crystal with filling fraction With increasing this crystal melts as is seen in figure 3(a) where we show a density plot of the transverse magnetization The magnetization displays the typical lobe-structure [14], and the formation of a (longitudinally) paramagnetic state () at large Here it is evident that the state of the strong species is formed by a superposition of states with different number of excitations.
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageLet us now have a look at the frustration energy when the weak species is added. The corresponding data is shown in figure 3(b). In the classical limit () we choose which corresponds to half filling of the strong species, and consider values of which stabilize the compatible case ( blue line) and the incompatible case ( red line), respectively. We first determine the values of numerically as the midpoints of the stability regions. In the compatible case one can use equation (2) to determine In the incompatible case on the other hand equation (2) cannot be applied directly. In the finite size case though, as previously mentioned, only fillings of the form p/L are accessible, and as such the region of stability of extends from the upper boundary for to the lower boundary for These cases are compatible such that we can use again equation (2) to estimate the midpoint of this region of stability. We find that the values obtained analytically from equation (2) are in remarkable agreement with the numerically determined values despite the small size of the system. At is zero for compatible densities and finite for incompatible ones. With increasing the w-species becomes more and more frustrated which is reflected in an increase of Interestingly, this increase is step-wise and each step is accompanied by a change of the filling fraction of w-atoms, whose value is provided in figure 3(b) for each plateau of
Furthermore, we show the behavior of the weak filling fraction in the entire plane in figures 3(c) and (d). Note, that contrary to (shown as contours in figure 3(a)), exhibits a lobe like structure which is not symmetric. This can be understood as follows: for a given finite the filling fraction decreases with decreasing The resulting smaller number of s-atoms permits the accommodation of a larger number of w-atoms. This effect is stronger the larger leading to an increasing asymmetry of the lobes in figures 3(c) and (d). Moreover, for any decreases stepwise with increasing and eventually vanishes. The decrease in can be qualitatively explained as follows: as increases the ground state begins to contain basis states with s-atom numbers that are larger than in the classical case. This forces the w-atoms to assume a lower filling fraction. The fraction of admixed basis states with increased s-atom number becomes larger the larger (see contours in figure 3(a)) which results in the asymmetry of the lobes in figures 3(c) and (d).
We expect the qualitative features, namely the increase of frustration with to hold also in the thermodynamic limit. To study this a semi-analytical treatment of quantum fluctuations based on a perturbative expansion of the ground state around the classical limit could in principle be performed. This task is, however, quite involved due to the fact that the filling fraction of the weak species is in fact a function of Nevertheless, one can still gain analytical insight into the quantum regime by considering the description of the system in terms of an approximate Hamiltonian, as is shown in the following.
5. Rokhsar-Kivelson approximation
In the following we conduct an approximate analytical study of the ground state by means of a RK Hamiltonian HRK. This generalizes the approach used in [11, 40, 41] for characterizing the statics of a Rydberg gas. The central idea is to approximate the Hamiltonian (1) as a sum of local positive semi-definite projective Hamiltonians In this case a state can be found which is annihilated by each of the local Hamiltonians, i.e. and thus represents the ground state of HRK. Under the RK approximation the ground state is given by a superposition of classical configurations of a gas of hard-core polymers. As is shown below, this procedure neglects the long-range tails in the interactions. As a consequence the densities that the different species assume in the classical limit need to be adjusted by hand.
We consider a situation where in the classical limit the densities of the weak and strong species are given by and In this case the we can think of atoms in terms of polymers extending over sites at maximal distance Rw = 1 (dimers) and Rs = 2 (trimers), respectively (see [41] for detail). The polymer analogy is equivalent to the hard-core conditions and Neglecting interactions on distances larger than and making the hard-core conditions explicit also in the laser-excitation part of the Hamiltonian [40, 41], we can rewrite Hamiltonian (1) as
where the local Hamiltonians are given by
The are the above-mentioned positive semi-definite operators which are proportional to projection operators and whose sum yields the RK Hamiltonian. The projection operators implement the hard-core condition by ensuring that dimers (trimers) do not occupy neighboring (next-neighboring) sites: and with
Hamiltonian (4) is not yet of RK form since there are a number of additional terms. For specific parameter choices, however, these terms vanish up to trivial constants. In order to make this more transparent we have introduced (following [40]) the parameters Those can be chosen freely since the Hamiltonian does not depend on them, as can be seen when multiplying out all the individual terms.
The RK form is assumed when choosing with and and requiring the parameters to accomplish
where gs = 5 and gw = 3. The first condition eliminates the two terms in the second line of equation (4) while the second one leads to a cancellation of the terms proportional to and Both conditions define the so-called RK-manifold (see figure 4(a)) on which Hamiltonian (4) assumes the RK form
Download figure:
Standard image High-resolution imageThe ground state of HRK is written as
where and The parameters can be then thought of as the fugacities of the dimers and trimers gases, such that large (small) values result in a ground state with high (low) density of the respective species. The ground state (8) can be represented explicitly as matrix product state (see e.g. [41]). We can now use the ground state HRK to get an idea of the effect of quantum fluctuations on crystalline states. We find that frustrated states emerge also away from the classical limit, i.e. for non-zero
By construction HRK is frustration free, i.e. the frustration energy (3) is always zero. In fact this is an artifact stemming from the omission of long-range tails. Nevertheless, the interspecies frustration still manifests in the behavior of the filling fractions, figure 4. In figure 4(b), where we set in order to have a low density of dimers, we find that indeed only dimers are occupying the lattice and that they fill it completely in the limit This corresponds to a unique (translationally invariant) crystalline ground state with On the other hand in figure 4(c) we fix the parameter such that the strong species (trimers) fills up the lattice at density We now increase which increases the density of the weak species. However, instead of a saturation at density 1/2—as in the absence of the strong species—we find that tends to a value of 1/3. This is a signature of inter-species frustration. The weak species does not crystallize but is in a superposition of exponentially many states with density 1/3, two of which are shown in the inset of figure 4(c).
6. Summary and outlook
We have investigated the statics of a two component Rydberg gas at zero temperature, with particular focus on the emergence of frustration effects. In the classical regime we identified regions in parameter space where the two Rydberg species form compatible and incompatible arrangements. In the quantum case we introduced the frustration energy to quantify the degree of frustration. We found that this quantity shows a staircase pattern as the system visits different phases characterized by different filling fractions. Finally, we performed an approximate analytical study of the quantum regime by means of an RK Hamiltonian, which further corroborated the existence of frustrated states.
Our analysis provides insights into the complexity of ground state structures in multi-component Rydberg gases. In the future it would be interesting to extend the work to situations without the strong-weak hierarchy that was assumed here. Moreover, an extension of the analysis to Rydberg gases with more than two relevant excited states and/or to high-dimensional lattices would be desirable due to the number of Rydberg lattice experiments that recently has become available.
Acknowledgments
We are very indebted to Weibin Li for providing us with data used to plot figure 2. EL would like to thank M Marcuzzi for insightful discussions. JM would like to thank H Weimer for useful discussions. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007–2013) / ERC Grant Agreement No. 335266 (ESCQUMA), the EU-FET grants HAIRS 612862 and from the University of Nottingham. Further funding was received through the H2020-FETPROACT-2014 Grant No. 640378 (RYSQ) and the EPSRC Grant No. EP/M014266/1.
Footnotes
- 2
This is strictly speaking true only in the asymptotic limit Otherwise an additional assumption has to be made on the filling fractions, namely and the situation we consider here. See also [38] for details.