This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft logo

The Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft (DPG) with a tradition extending back to 1845 is the largest physical society in the world with more than 61,000 members. The DPG sees itself as the forum and mouthpiece for physics and is a non-profit organisation that does not pursue financial interests. It supports the sharing of ideas and thoughts within the scientific community, fosters physics teaching and would also like to open a window to physics for all those with a healthy curiosity.

http://www.dpg-physik.de

Close

Institute of Physics logo

The Institute of Physics (IOP) is a leading scientific society promoting physics and bringing physicists together for the benefit of all. It has a worldwide membership of around 50 000 comprising physicists from all sectors, as well as those with an interest in physics. It works to advance physics research, application and education; and engages with policy makers and the public to develop awareness and understanding of physics. Its publishing company, IOP Publishing, is a world leader in professional scientific communications.

http://www.iop.org

Close

Traffic jams without bottlenecks—experimental evidence for the physical mechanism of the formation of a jam

, , , , , , and

Published 4 March 2008 IOP Publishing and Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft
, ,

Abstract

A traffic jam on a highway is a very familiar phenomenon. From the physical viewpoint, the system of vehicular flow is a non-equilibrium system of interacting particles (vehicles). The collective effect of the many-particle system induces the instability of a free flow state caused by the enhancement of fluctuations, and the transition to a jamming state occurs spontaneously if the average vehicle density exceeds a certain critical value. Thus, a bottleneck is only a trigger and not the essential origin of a traffic jam. In this paper, we present the first experimental evidence that the emergence of a traffic jam is a collective phenomenon like 'dynamical' phase transitions and pattern formation in a non-equilibrium system. We have performed an experiment on a circuit to show the emergence of a jam with no bottleneck. In the initial condition, all the vehicles are moving, homogeneously distributed on the circular road, with the same velocity. The average density of the vehicles is prepared for the onset of the instability. Even a tiny fluctuation grows larger and then the homogeneous movement cannot be maintained. Finally, a jam cluster appears and propagates backward like a solitary wave with the same speed as that of a jam cluster on a highway.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. 

Why do traffic jams appear on highways? The phenomenon occurs every day, but the reason has been poorly understood. We often encounter a jam even if we have no apparent reasons such as traffic accidents or construction. It is commonly understood that such a jam appears near a 'bottleneck', for example, on-ramps, tunnels and sags.

In the 1990s, a new physical concept was introduced into research on traffic flow [1]–[4]. That is, traffic flow is investigated as a dynamical phenomenon of a many-particle system. In general, such a system drastically changes its macroscopic aspect owing to the effect of the collective motion of interacting particles. Such phenomena are observed in several fields in physics. The characteristic features of collective phenomena are phase transition, bifurcation of a dynamical system, pattern formation, etc. It is not unexpected that the same physical mechanism appears in socio-dynamical objects. Traffic jams are just the subject for investigation along this line. We have succeeded in simulating a traffic jam by mathematical models without a bottleneck, whenever the average vehicle density on the road exceeds a certain critical value  [2]–[4]. The crucial point is the effect of collective motion caused by the interaction among vehicles, which is originated by drivers seeing other vehicles. The effect makes the free flow unstable and generates a traffic jam similar to phase transitions and pattern formation in non-equilibrium many-particle systems.

Can our mathematical prediction be tested? In this paper, we report the first experimental verification that a jam can be generated in the absence of a bottleneck. Our experimental result is consistent with our simulations, and provides clear evidence that the emergence of a jam is a collective phenomenon.

In real data, the relationship between vehicle density and flow rate (fundamental diagram) has a universal property in highway traffic (figure 1). The data points of traffic flow are sharply divided into two parts at the critical value of the vehicle density, labelled as free flow and congested traffic flow. In the congested flow part, it is easily supposed that a traffic jam appears just beyond the critical density. Fundamental diagrams show similar shapes at any point on any highway, and the critical density is almost the same value. Such common properties indicate that the phenomenon of traffic jams can be studied from the physical point of view as a dynamical phase transition.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. The typical fundamental diagram (the relation between vehicle density and flow rate) from 1 month of data measured at a point on a freeway. The critical density is nearly 25 (vehicles km−1). The data were measured by the Japan Highway Public Cooperation.

On highways, a driver controls a vehicle so as not to collide with the vehicle in front, meaning that a vehicle slows down at a short headway distance. This behavior is essential for describing the phenomena of traffic flow. Thus, we treat the vehicles as particles moving collectively with an interaction such that each changes its velocity on seeing the preceding vehicle to avoid collision. Mathematical models of traffic flow are constructed focusing on this simple property of the motion of vehicles. In short, traffic flow is a non-equilibrium physical system consisting of moving particles with asymmetric interaction of exclusive effect. The models have basically two kinds of solutions: a free flow solution and jam flow solutions. In a free flow solution, all vehicles move at nearly the same large velocity with a safe distance between two successive vehicles. In contrast, a jam flow solution shows traveling clusters in a flow. Vehicles almost stop in a cluster, which is identified with a traffic jam. Such models have succeeded in forming a jam on a circuit in the absence of a bottleneck, when a free flow is initially set and the average vehicle density is a little bit larger than a certain critical value, which corresponds to the critical density of fundamental diagrams [4]–[10]11,12.

The physical mechanism of forming a jam is summarized as follows. Small fluctuations always exist in the movement of vehicles in a traffic flow. If the vehicle density is low, such a fluctuation disappears and the free flow is maintained. On the other hand, if the density exceeds the critical value, the fluctuation cannot disappear but instead grows steadily and eventually breaks the free flow. After relaxation, a jam is created and travels along the circuit without decaying. Mathematically, the free flow solution is unstable and the jam flow solutions become stable. The stability change at the critical density caused by the enhancement of fluctuations in a free flow is understood as a phase transition of non-equilibrium systems. The phenomenon originates from the dynamical effect of the collective motion in a many-body system. It does not require the existence of a bottleneck.

The mechanism works in a real traffic flow. Here, we describe an experiment that confirms our mathematical studies, under the same environment consistent with our simulation [4]. We believe that our experiment clearly eliminates the existing prejudice about the origin of a jam, that is, a jam appears only near a bottleneck. We reveal the essential origin of jam formation from the physical point of view.

We perform the experiment using a circular road in a homogeneous lane condition on flat ground. The setting corresponds to the situation of the mathematical simulations13,14. A snapshot of the experiment is shown in figure 2. We set a queue of vehicles moving along the circular road. A sufficient number of vehicles are put onto the circular road so that the density satisfies the condition for the onset of the instability of free flow, which is estimated by a mathematical model [4, 12]. The circumference is 230 m, and the number of vehicles is 22. A 360-degree video camera was set at the center.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. A snapshot of the experiment on a circular road. The circumference is 230 m, and the number of vehicles is 22. A 360-degree video camera is situated at the center of the circle for measurement.

Before starting the experiment, the vehicles were tuned so that they cruise along the circular road at the same velocity (~30 km h−1) with almost uniform spacing. The drivers were requested to cruise at about 30 km h−1. The velocity seems to be high considering the average headway distance. We need an appropriate velocity for cruising in order to satisfy the unstable condition for homogeneous motion in our situation. We can identify the motion of the queue of vehicles with a free flow. Then, the experiment started. The drivers are only instructed to follow the vehicle ahead in safety in addition to trying to maintain their cruising velocity. We provide two supplementary movies of the experiment, available from stacks.iop.org/NJP/10/033001/mmedia. A bird's-eye view of the experiment is seen in movie 1 and movie 2 shows a view from the 360-degree camera. In the initial stage, the free flow is maintained for a while (figure 3(a)). After some time, small fluctuations appeared in the headway distances and developed as time progressed. It takes a period of time for the fluctuations to grow enough to break down the free flow. The free flow has been disturbed and the vehicles cannot move homogeneously any more. Finally, several vehicles are forced to stop completely for a moment (figure 3(b)). A clear 'stop-and-go wave' is observed, and furthermore, it propagates in the opposite direction to the movement of vehicles, which is nothing but a jam. The jam cluster moves as a solitary wave and maintains its size and velocity (figure 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3. The vehicles move along the circle. The pictures are taken by the 360-degree video camera. We show the position of each vehicle by a triangle: (a) The snapshot at the initial stage shows that the vehicles move as the free flow. (b) The snapshot 3 min later shows that a jam has been formed. A jam consists of five vehicles, which is seen at the top of the circle at this moment. This picture corresponds to figure 2. (A jam is observed on the upper right corner of the circle.)

Figure 4.

Figure 4. The traces of individual vehicles on the circular road (0 m-point is identical to 230 m-point) in the period of 2 min during the emergence of a jam. The data are captured from the movie taken by the 360-degree video camera (for example, pictures in figure 3). The jam cluster is clearly observed and it moves backward at a velocity of roughly 20 km h−1 and maintains its motion.

We observed the instability of free flow on the circular road and the emergence of a traffic jam with no obstacle or bottleneck. The vehicles inside the cluster of the jam stop completely, and the vehicles outside move freely (~40 km h−1). The vehicle at the front of the cluster starts to accelerate and escapes from it, while another vehicle reaches the back of the cluster. The repetition of such a movement preserves the stability of the cluster, and the cluster itself travels backward with a velocity of roughly 20 km h−1—the common value of the velocity of a jam measured on real highways (figure 5) [13]–[15]. The essential property of a jam is determined by the movement. As a result, the backward velocity of a jam cluster is not affected whether the length of the cluster is long or short. Although the emerging jam cluster in this experiment is small (five vehicles), its behavior is not different from large ones on highways.

Figure 5.

Figure 5. The traces of individual vehicles on the highway in an aerial photograph taken in 1967 by Treiterer and Myers [14]. (The curves are traced from figure 1 of [14].) The green line representing a backward velocity of 20 km h−1, which corresponds to the velocity of the jam cluster in our experiment, is added as a reference.

The essence of the instability in highway traffic can be realized in our experiment. The conditions for the velocity and headway seem to be hard for drivers, because the length of the circuit is short. If we had used a longer circuit, the experiment could have been performed much more easily. We performed several experiments with different numbers of vehicles. In the case of 23, a jam cluster was formed and its velocity was the same as the case of 2215.

The mechanism of the formation of a jam in the practical situation on highways is explained basically by a similar scenario to the experiment on a circular road. Suppose an open system such as a straight road. When a large number of vehicles, beyond the road capacity, are successively injected into the road, the density exceeds the critical value and the free flow state becomes unstable. The situation is the same as the setting of the experiment. In this situation, some perturbation breaks the free flow and its state transits to a jam flow state, just as the enhancement of fluctuations does in the case of our experiment. In any case, the instability of a free flow caused by exceeding the critical density leads to the transition to a jamming state by the collective effect of vehicles such as the enhancement of fluctuations or some perturbation. Actually, the emerging jam on a circular road has just the same property as that observed upstream of a bottleneck on highways.

We have shown that the emergence of a traffic jam really occurs in the absence of a bottleneck. A jam is generated spontaneously only if the average vehicle density exceeds the critical value. Under this condition, the free flow state is unstable and even a tiny fluctuation grows and the state transits to jamming phase by the effect of collective motion. Thus neither an apparent obstacle nor a bottleneck is needed for the formation of a jam. However, it is commonly believed that a bottleneck causes a traffic jam. Actually, it seems this way because a bottleneck increases the density and makes the density exceed the critical value. The condition is simply realized on a circular road, because the density can be fixed beyond the critical value just as in our experiment. In conclusion, jam formation is an effect of the collective motion in the physics of a non-equilibrium phase transition of a many-particle system. The emergence of a jam with no bottleneck provides proof of the essential mechanism of the formation of a jam.

Acknowledgments

The experiment was carried out at the track at Nakanihon Automotive College. We thank T Yosida, H Oikawa and other staff and students for experimental assistance. We also thank S Kitakado and A I Sanda for improving the manuscript. This work was partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (no 15560051) of the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture.

Footnotes

  • 11 
  • 12 
  • 13 

    Circular road experiments were done by some traffic engineers many years ago. But their purpose and interest are completely different from ours. See for example [11].

  • 14 

    The preliminary performance was done for a science TV program supported by some members of our group in 2000. The plan was provided by M Bando, M Kikuchi, A Nakayama, K Nakanishi and Y Sugiyama.

  • 15 

    More detailed discussions on the results of the experiments and the range of density for instability will be presented in our forthcoming papers and future experiments.

References

  • [1]
    D E Wolf, M Schreckenberg and A Bachem (ed) 1996 Traffic and Granular Flow (Singapore: World Scientific)
  • [2]
    Nagel K and Schreckenberg M 1992 J. Physique I 2 2221

    Crossref

  • [3]
    Kerner B S and Konhäuser P 1993 Phys. Rev. E 48 2335

    Crossref

  • [4]
    Bando M, Hasebe K, Nakayama A, Shibata A and Sugiyama Y 1995 Phys. Rev. E 51 1035

    Crossref

  • [5]
    Chowdhury D, Santen L and Schadschneider A 2000 Phys. Rep. 329 199

    Crossref

  • [6]
    Helbing D 2001 Rev. Mod. Phys. 73 1067

    Crossref

  • [7]
    Nagatani T 2002 Rep. Prog. Phys. 65 1331

    IOPscience

  • [8]
    Kerner B 2004 The Physics of Traffic (Berlin: Springer)

    Crossref

  • [9]
    Delitala M and Tosin A 2007 Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 17 901

    Crossref

  • [10]
    Coscia E, Delitala M and Frasca P 2007 Int. J. Non-linear Mech. 42 411

    Crossref

  • [11]
    Wardrop J G 1965 Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. on the Theory of Road Traffic Flow ed J Almond (London: OECD) p 102
  • [12]
    Bando M, Hasebe K, Nakayama A, Nakanishi K, Shibata A and Sugiyama Y 1995 J. Physique I 5 1389

    Crossref

  • [13]
    Yukawa S, Kikuchi M, Nakayama A, Nishinari K, Sugiyama Y and Tadaki S 2003 Traffic and Granular Flow '01 ed M Fukui, Y Sugiyama, M Schreckenberg and D E Wolf (Heidelberg: Springer) p 243

    Crossref

  • [14]
    Treiterer J and Myers J A 1974 Transportation and Traffic Theory ed D J Buckley (New York: Elsevier) p 13
  • [15]
    Koshi M (ed) 1989 An Introduction to Traffic Engineering (Tokyo: Gijutsu Shoin) (in Japanese)

Export references: BibTeX RIS

Citations

  1. Wave Propagation of Junctional Remodeling in Collective Cell Movement of Epithelial Tissue: Numerical Simulation Study
    Tetsuya Hiraiwa et al  2017 Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology  5

    Crossref

  2. Bifurcation structure of a car-following model with nonlinear dependence on the relative velocity
    Akiyasu Tomoeda et al  2017 Transportmetrica A: Transport Science  1

    Crossref

  3. Boris S. Kerner  2017 307

    Crossref

  4. Boris S. Kerner  2017 123

    Crossref

  5. Boris S. Kerner  2017 1

    Crossref

  6. Dependence of driving characteristics upon follower-leader combination
    Akihito Nagahama et al  2017 Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 

    Crossref

  7. Toward Mitigating Phantom Jam Using Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication
    Myounggyu Won et al  2017 IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems  18 1313

    Crossref

  8. Der Stau als Forschungsobjekt
    André et al  2017 Physik in unserer Zeit  48 142

    Crossref

  9. Rodrick Wallace  2017 167

    Crossref

  10. State-space linear stability analysis of platoons of cooperative vehicles
    J. Sau et al  2017 Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics  1

    Crossref

  11. Influence of the number of predecessors in interaction within acceleration-based flow models
    Antoine Tordeux et al  2017 Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical  50 345102

    IOPscience

  12. Nazleeni Haron  2016 349

    Crossref

  13. Constantin F. Caruntu et al  2016 644

    Crossref

  14. Prafull Kasture and Hidekazu Nishimura  2016 29

    Crossref

  15. Predicting Road Conditions with Internet Search
    Nikolaos Askitas and Constantine Dovrolis  2016 PLOS ONE  11 e0162080

    Crossref

  16. Merlon-type density waves in a compartmentalized conveyor system
    G. Kanellopoulos and K. van derWeele  2016 The European Physical Journal Special Topics  225 1211

    Crossref

  17. Coexistence of up- and downstream traffic waves on a ring road
    K. van der Weele and G. Kanellopoulos  2016 The European Physical Journal Special Topics  225 1127

    Crossref

  18. Congestion warning method based on the Internet of vehicles and community discovery of complex networks
    Zhao Ting et al  2016 The Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications  23 37

    Crossref

  19. Efficient Driving on Multilane Roads Under a Connected Vehicle Environment
    Md Abdus Samad Kamal et al  2016 IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems  17 2541

    Crossref

  20. Francois Belletti et al  2016 6127

    Crossref

  21. On the equivalence between continuum and car-following models of traffic flow
    Wen-Long Jin  2016 Transportation Research Part B: Methodological  93 543

    Crossref

  22. Cellular automaton model simulating spatiotemporal patterns, phase transitions and concave growth pattern of oscillations in traffic flow
    Junfang Tian et al  2016 Transportation Research Part B: Methodological  93 560

    Crossref

  23. Anytime route planning with constrained devices
    Marcus de L. Braga et al  2016 Computers & Electrical Engineering  54 53

    Crossref

  24. Traffic Dynamics of Bicycle Flow: Experiment and Modeling
    Rui Jiang et al  2016 Transportation Science 

    Crossref

  25. Cluster statistics and quasisoliton dynamics in microscopic optimal-velocity models
    Bo Yang et al  2016 Physical Review E  93

    Crossref

  26. Agent-based modeling of lane discipline in heterogeneous traffic
    Damian N. Dailisan and May T. Lim  2016 Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 

    Crossref

  27. Failure of classical traffic flow theories: Stochastic highway capacity and automatic driving
    Boris S. Kerner  2016 Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications  450 700

    Crossref

  28. Characterizing and distinguishing free and jammed traffic flows from the distribution and correlation of experimental speed data
    Shin-ichi Tadaki et al  2016 New Journal of Physics  18 083022

    IOPscience

  29. Quantitative explanation of circuit experiments and real traffic using the optimal velocity model
    Akihiro Nakayama et al  2016 New Journal of Physics  18 043040

    IOPscience

  30. M. Hafez M. Ariffin et al  2015 132

    Crossref

  31. Cosmin Copot et al  2015 454

    Crossref

  32. Group chase and escape model with chasers’ interaction
    Takuya Saito et al  2015 Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 

    Crossref

  33. Jamological approach to steel production and logistics
    Osamu Yamaguchi et al  2015 IFAC-PapersOnLine  48 18

    Crossref

  34. Pattern formation in annular systems of repulsive particles
    Christian Marschler et al  2015 Physics Letters A 

    Crossref

  35. Jinsoo Kim et al  2015 999

    Crossref

  36. M. A. S. Kamal et al  2015 736

    Crossref

  37. On the appearance of traffic jams in a long chain with a shortcut in the bulk
    N.Zh. Bunzarova et al  2015 Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 

    Crossref

  38. Prediction of traffic convective instability with spectral analysis of the Aw–Rascle–Zhang model
    Francois Belletti et al  2015 Physics Letters A 

    Crossref

  39. Asymmetric optimal-velocity car-following model
    Xihua Xu et al  2015 Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 

    Crossref

  40. Physicochemical design and analysis of self-propelled objects that are characteristically sensitive to environments
    Satoshi Nakata et al  2015 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.  17 10326

    Crossref

  41. Emission Mitigation via Longitudinal Control of Intelligent Vehicles in a Congested Platoon
    Zhaodong Wang et al  2015 Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering  n/a

    Crossref

  42. Traffic Experiment Reveals the Nature of Car-Following
    Rui Jiang et al  2014 PLoS ONE  9 e94351

    Crossref

  43. Constantin F. Caruntu et al  2014 664

    Crossref

  44. Fumito Nakamura and Keisuke Yamazaki  2014 956

    Crossref

  45. Smart Driving of a Vehicle Using Model Predictive Control for Improving Traffic Flow
    Md Abdus Samad Kamal et al  2014 IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems  15 878

    Crossref

  46. Fajar Yoseph Chandra et al  2014 391

    Crossref

  47. Extreme power law in a driven many-particle system without threshold dynamics
    Roman Mani et al  2014 Physical Review E  90

    Crossref

  48. Multijam Solutions in Traffic Models with Velocity-Dependent Driver Strategies
    Paul Carter et al  2014 SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics  74 1895

    Crossref

  49. Variable speed limit control for steady and oscillatory queues at fixed freeway bottlenecks
    Danjue Chen et al  2014 Transportation Research Part B: Methodological  70 340

    Crossref

  50. A parsimonious model for the formation of oscillations in car-following models
    Jorge A. Laval et al  2014 Transportation Research Part B: Methodological  70 228

    Crossref

  51. Collision-free nonuniform dynamics within continuous optimal velocity models
    Antoine Tordeux and Armin Seyfried  2014 Physical Review E  90

    Crossref

  52. Mechanism of Early-Onset Breakdown at On-Ramp Bottlenecks on Shanghai, China, Expressways
    Jian Sun et al  2014 Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board  2421 64

    Crossref

  53. Spatio-temporal clustering for non-recurrent traffic congestion detection on urban road networks
    Berk Anbaroglu et al  2014 Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies  48 47

    Crossref

  54. Universal flow-density relation of single-file bicycle, pedestrian and car motion
    J. Zhang et al  2014 Physics Letters A 

    Crossref

  55. Discontinuity waves as tipping points: Applications to biological & sociological systems
    Brian Straughan and John Bissell  2014 Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - Series B  19 1911

    Crossref

  56. Optimal Averaging Time for Predicting Traffic Velocity Using Floating Car Data Technique for Advanced Traveler Information System
    Fergyanto E. Gunawan and Fajar Yoseph Chandra  2014 Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences  138 566

    Crossref

  57. Saving Human Lives: What Complexity Science and Information Systems can Contribute
    Dirk Helbing et al  2014 Journal of Statistical Physics 

    Crossref

  58. Ergodicity of Traffic Flow with Constant Penetration Rate for Traffic Monitoring via Floating Vehicle Technique
    Fergyanto E. Gunawan et al  2014 EPJ Web of Conferences  68 00020

    Crossref

  59. Supporting driver headway choice: The effects of discrete headway feedback when following headway instructions
    Malte Risto and Marieke H. Martens  2014 Applied Ergonomics 

    Crossref

  60. Towards an ecology of the lung: new conceptual models of pulmonary microbiology and pneumonia pathogenesis
    Robert P Dickson et al  2014 The Lancet Respiratory Medicine  2 238

    Crossref

  61. Traffic accidents on a single-lane road with multi-slowdown sections
    Xingli Li et al  2014 International Journal of Modern Physics C  1450036

    Crossref

  62. Steady-state traffic flow on a ring road with up- and down-slopes
    Chun-Xiu Wu et al  2014 Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 

    Crossref

  63. Network capacity, traffic instability, and adaptive driving: findings from simulated urban network experiments
    Meead Saberi et al  2014 EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics 

    Crossref

  64. An empirical study of phase transitions from synchronized flow to jams on a single-lane highway
    Cheng-Jie Jin et al  2014 Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical  47 125104

    IOPscience

  65. Reactive Clustering Method for Platooning Autonomous Mobile Robots
    Satoshi Hoshino  2013 IFAC Proceedings Volumes  46 152

    Crossref

  66. K. M. Udofia and J. O. Emagbetere  2013 662

    Crossref

  67. Hermann Kopetz and Stephan Poledna  2013 1

    Crossref

  68. Comparative Analysis of Pedestrian, Bicycle and Car Traffic Moving in Circuits
    Jun Zhang et al  2013 Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences  104 1130

    Crossref

  69. Invariance and homogenization of an adaptive time gap car-following model
    R. Monneau et al  2013 Nonlinear Differential Equations and Applications NoDEA 

    Crossref

  70. Constructing set-valued fundamental diagrams from Jamiton solutions in second order traffic models
    Benjamin Seibold et al  2013 Networks and Heterogeneous Media  8 745

    Crossref

  71. Modeling probabilistic traffic breakdown on congested freeway flow
    Tian-dong Xu et al  2013 Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering  40 999

    Crossref

  72. Platoon-based macroscopic model for intelligent traffic flow
    D. Ngoduy  2013 Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics  1 153

    Crossref

  73. Stability and bifurcation in network traffic flow: A Poincaré map approach
    Wen-Long Jin  2013 Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 

    Crossref

  74. Criticism of generally accepted fundamentals and methodologies of traffic and transportation theory: A brief review
    Boris S. Kerner  2013 Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 

    Crossref

  75. Agent-based simulation as a tool for the built environment
    Paolo Gaudiano  2013 Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences  n/a

    Crossref

  76. Modeling and designing aircraft taxiing patterns for a large airport
    Yusuke Kariya et al  2013 Advanced Robotics  1

    Crossref

  77. Multi-robot coordination for jams in congested systems
    Satoshi Hoshino and Hiroya Seki  2013 Robotics and Autonomous Systems 

    Crossref

  78. Analytical studies on the instabilities of heterogeneous intelligent traffic flow
    D. Ngoduy  2013 Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 

    Crossref

  79. Modelling interacting molecular motors with an internal degree of freedom
    Itai Pinkoviezky and Nir S Gov  2013 New Journal of Physics  15 025009

    IOPscience

  80. Phase transition in traffic jam experiment on a circuit
    Shin-ichi Tadaki et al  2013 New Journal of Physics  15 103034

    IOPscience

  81. Traffic Instabilities in Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowds
    Mehdi Moussaïd et al  2012 PLoS Computational Biology  8 e1002442

    Crossref

  82. Crowding Effects in Vehicular Traffic
    Jay Samuel L. Combinido et al  2012 PLoS ONE  7 e48151

    Crossref

  83. Traffic Flow Merging and Bifurcating at Junction on Two-Lane Highway
    Kazuhiro Tobita et al  2012 World Journal of Mechanics  02 203

    Crossref

  84. Clusters in Macroscopic Traffic Flow Models
    Rosa María Velasco and Patricia Saavedra  2012 World Journal of Mechanics  02 51

    Crossref

  85. Murray Goulden and Robert Dingwall  2012 2 9

    Crossref

  86. Traffic Congestion Evaluation and Signal Control Optimization Based on Wireless Sensor Networks: Model and Algorithms
    Wei Zhang et al  2012 Mathematical Problems in Engineering  2012 1

    Crossref

  87. Jam Eyes: A Traffic Jam Awareness and Observation System Using Mobile Phones
    Xing Zhang et al  2012 International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks  2012 1

    Crossref

  88. Stuck in traffic: Patterns of powder adhesion
    N. Nirmal Thyagu et al  2012 The European Physical Journal E  35

    Crossref

  89. Linear stability analysis of first-order delayed car-following models on a ring
    Sylvain Lassarre et al  2012 Physical Review E  86

    Crossref

  90. Earthquake model describes traffic jams caused by imperfect driving styles
    Ferenc Járai-Szabó and and Zoltán Néda  2012 Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 

    Crossref

  91. One-Dimensional Particle Processes with Acceleration/Braking Asymmetry
    Cyril Furtlehner et al  2012 Journal of Statistical Physics  147 1113

    Crossref

  92. Two-Vehicle Dynamics of the Car-Following Models on Realistic Driving Condition
    Fergyanto E GUNAWAN  2012 Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology  12 67

    Crossref

  93. Distributed and adaptive traffic signal control within a realistic traffic simulation
    Dave McKenney and Tony White  2012 Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 

    Crossref

  94. Spring-block model for a single-lane highway traffic
    Ferenc Járai-Szabó et al  2011 Central European Journal of Physics 

    Crossref

  95. A study of the emergence of kinematic waves in targeted state car-following models of traffic
    Antoine Tordeux et al  2011 Cybergeo 

    Crossref

  96. Washout Control of a Cyclic Vehicular Traffic Flow
    Shigeru Yamamoto and Eiji Sakaguchi  2011 IFAC Proceedings Volumes  44 8421

    Crossref

  97. S. Hoshino  2011 2810

    Crossref

  98. Cory Bevilacqua et al  2011 115

    Crossref

  99. S. C. Calvert et al  2011 614

    Crossref

  100. Thijs H. A. van den Broek et al  2011 279

    Crossref

  101. THE INFLUENCE OF INDIVIDUAL DRIVER CHARACTERISTICS ON CONGESTION FORMATION
    LANJUN WANG et al  2011 International Journal of Modern Physics C  22 305

    Crossref

  102. Bibliography
    2011 491

    Crossref

  103. Cellular-automaton model of the cooperative dynamics of RNA polymerase II during transcription in human cells
    Yoshihiro Ohta et al  2011 Physical Review E  84 041922

    Crossref

  104. Density wave propagation of a wave train in a closed excitable medium
    Nobuhiko Suematsu et al  2011 Physical Review E  84 046203

    Crossref

  105. Jam emergence on a circular track in a car-following model
    L.C. Davis  2011 Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications  390 943

    Crossref

  106. Lattice thermodynamic model for vehicular congestions
    Milan Krbálek and Katarína Kittanová  2011 Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences  20 398

    Crossref

  107. Dissolution of traffic jam via additional local interactions
    Hyun Keun Lee and Beom Jun Kim  2011 Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 

    Crossref

  108. Evidence of convective instability in congested traffic flow: A systematic empirical and theoretical investigation
    Martin Treiber and Arne Kesting  2011 Transportation Research Part B Methodological 

    Crossref

  109. Asymptotic Dynamics of Self-driven Vehicles in a Closed Boundary
    Chi-Lun Lee and Chia-Ling Huang  2011 Journal of Statistical Physics  144 813

    Crossref

  110. Separation of circulating tokens
    K. GhoshDastidar and T. Herman  2011 Theoretical Computer Science  412 4312

    Crossref

  111. Evidence of Convective Instability in Congested Traffic Flow: A Systematic Empirical and Theoretical Investigation
    Martin Treiber and Arne Kesting  2011 Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences  17 683

    Crossref

  112. Car-following model with relative-velocity effect and its experimental verification
    Daisuke Shamoto et al  2011 Physical Review E  83 046105

    Crossref

  113. Complex spatiotemporal behavior in a chain of one-way nonlinearly coupled elements
    Jens Starke et al  2010 Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - Series S  4 1167

    Crossref

  114. Two-lane traffic-flow model with an exact steady-state solution
    Masahiro Kanai  2010 Physical Review E  82 066107

    Crossref

  115. Dynamical phenomena induced by bottleneck
    I. Gasser and B. Werner  2010 Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences  368 4543

    Crossref

  116. Saddle-node bifurcation to jammed state for quasi-one-dimensional counter-chemotactic flow
    Masashi Fujii et al  2010 Physical Review E  82 015102

    Crossref

  117. Collective behavior of inanimate boats
    Nobuhiko J. Suematsu et al  2010 Physical Review E  81 056210

    Crossref

  118. Intelligent Cruise Control of Circulating Multi-Robot Effective for Congestion(TRANSLOG2009/J-RAIL2009)
    Satoshi HOSHINO et al  2010 Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers Series C  76 2387

    Crossref

  119. Atsushi Kamimura et al  2010 6350 570

    Crossref

  120. Satoshi Hoshino et al  2010 2101

    Crossref


  121. Gerrit J. L. Naus et al  2010 IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology  59 4268

    Crossref


  122. Xiqun Chen et al  2010 IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems  11 773

    Crossref


  123. Satoshi Hoshino et al  2010 IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering  7 887

    Crossref

  124. Calibration of the Particle Density in Cellular-Automaton Models for Traffic Flow
    Masahiro Kanai  2010 Journal of the Physical Society of Japan  79 075002

    Crossref

  125. The bursting of housing bubble as jamming phase transition
    Katsuhiro Nishinari et al  2010 Journal of Physics: Conference Series  221 012006

    IOPscience

  126. Group chase and escape
    Atsushi Kamimura and Toru Ohira  2010 New Journal of Physics  12 053013

    IOPscience

  127. On the Intrinsic Concordance between the Wide Scattering Feature of Synchronized Flow and the Empirical Spacing Distributions
    Chen Xi-Qun et al  2010 Chinese Physics Letters  27 074501

    IOPscience

  128. Self-sustained nonlinear waves in traffic flow
    M. R. Flynn et al  2009 Physical Review E  79 056113

    Crossref

  129. On the controversy around Daganzo’s requiem for and Aw-Rascle’s resurrection of second-order traffic flow models
    D. Helbing and A. F. Johansson  2009 The European Physical Journal B 

    Crossref

  130. Ultradiscrete optimal velocity model: A cellular-automaton model for traffic flow and linear instability of high-flux traffic
    Masahiro Kanai et al  2009 Physical Review E  79 056108

    Crossref

  131. Theoretical vs. empirical classification and prediction of congested traffic states
    D. Helbing et al  2009 The European Physical Journal B 

    Crossref

  132. A power law for the duration of high-flow states and its interpretation from a heterogeneous traffic flow perspective
    D. Helbing and B. Tilch  2009 The European Physical Journal B 

    Crossref

  133. Analytical calculation of critical perturbation amplitudes and critical densities by non-linear stability analysis of a simple traffic flow model
    D. Helbing and M. Moussaid  2009 The European Physical Journal B 

    Crossref

  134. Solitons in a macroscopic traffic model
    P. Saavedra and R.M. Velasco  2009 IFAC Proceedings Volumes  42 428

    Crossref

  135. Metastability in the formation of an experimental traffic jam
    Akihiro Nakayama et al  2009 New Journal of Physics  11 083025

    IOPscience

  136. Is Weak Emergence Just in the Mind?
    Mark A. Bedau  2008 Minds and Machines  18 443

    Crossref

  137. A theory of traffic congestion at heavy bottlenecks
    Boris S Kerner  2008 Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical  41 215101

    IOPscience

Export citations: BibTeX RIS

Thumbnail, link to multimedia file
Movie 1. (3.0 MB, MPG) Bird's-eye view of the experiment.

Thumbnail, link to multimedia file
Movie 2. (3.0 MB, MPG) View from the 360-degree camera.