This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Corrigendum • The following article is Free article

Corrigendum: Comparing Unet training with three different datasets to correct CBCT images for prostate radiotherapy dose calculations (2019 Phys. Med. Biol. 64 035011)

, , , , , , , and

Published 8 April 2019 • © 2019 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine
, , Citation Guillaume Landry et al 2019 Phys. Med. Biol. 64 089501 DOI 10.1088/1361-6560/ab0e99

Download Article PDF

This is a correction for 2019 Phys. Med. Biol. 64 035011

Article metrics

534 Total downloads

Share this article

Author e-mails

christopher.kurz@physik.uni-muenchen.de

Author affiliations

1 Department of Medical Physics, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching, Germany

2 Gradient Software, Aarhus, Denmark

3 Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany

4 Universitäts-Sternwarte, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, München, Germany

5 Excellence Cluster Universe, Garching, Germany

6 Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching, Germany

7 German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany

8 Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.

Dates

  1. Received 4 March 2019
  2. Accepted 11 March 2019
  3. Published

Check for updates using Crossmark

Buy this article in print

Journal RSS
Sign up for new issue notifications
0031-9155/64/8/089501

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Previous article in issue
Next article in issue

The colorbar range in figures 9(c), (e) and (g) in our article was unfortunately incorrect. The correct range is $-15\%$ to 15%, and not $-2\%$ to 2%. This error does not impact the quantitative analyses reported in the main body of the article or in other figures.

10.1088/1361-6560/ab0e99