This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy. Close this notification

THE ABUNDANCE OF X-SHAPED RADIO SOURCES. I. VLA SURVEY OF 52 SOURCES WITH OFF-AXIS DISTORTIONS

, , , , and

Published 2015 September 1 © 2015. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation David H. Roberts et al 2015 ApJS 220 7 DOI 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/7

0067-0049/220/1/7

ABSTRACT

Cheung identified a sample of 100 candidate X-shaped radio galaxies using the NRAO FIRST survey; these are small-axial-ratio extended radio sources with off-axis emission. Here, we present radio images of 52 of these sources that have been made from archival Very Large Array data with resolution of about 1''. Fifty-one of the 52 were observed at 1.4 GHz, 7 were observed at 1.4 and 5 GHz, and 1 was observed only at 5 GHz. We also present overlays of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey red images for 48 of the sources, and DSS II overlays for the remainder. Optical counterparts have been identified for most sources, but there remain a few empty fields. Our higher resolution VLA images along with FIRST survey images of the sources in the sample reveal that extended extragalactic radio sources with small axial ratios are largely (60%) cases of double radio sources with twin lobes that have off-axis extensions, usually with inversion-symmetric structure. The available radio images indicate that at most 20% of sources might be genuine X-shaped radio sources that could have formed by a restarting of beams in a new direction following an interruption and axis flip. The remaining 20% are in neither of these categories. The implications of this result for the gravitational wave background are discussed in Roberts et al.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. INTRODUCTION

The X-shaped radio galaxy (XRG) population has been the subject of several recent works that have sought to understand the formation mechanism for the non-classical symmetric double lobed radio sources that have peculiar off-axis extended radio structures. The two main contending formation scenarios differ quite starkly: the rapid axis flip and slow axis precession mechanisms require the active galactic nucleus (AGN) beam axis to have undergone a rapid or slow rotation by a large angle (e.g., due to accretion disk instabilities; Dennett-Thorpe et al. 2002; Merritt & Ekers 2002; Gong et al. 2011), whereas the backflow-origin scenario requires a backflow to either have been deflected by the thermal halo surrounding the host elliptical (Leahy & Williams 1984; Worrall et al. 1995) or be escaping from a high pressure region along the steepest pressure gradient along the minor axis (Capetti et al. 2002). Besides these models there are at least two other models that seek to explain the X-structures of radio galaxies involving either twin radio-loud AGN with axes oriented at large angles with respect to each other (Lal & Rao 2007) or jet-shell interactions (Gopal-Krishna et al. 2012). The models are not without drawbacks (e.g., see Saripalli & Subrahmanyan 2009 and Gopal-Krishna et al. 2012). While it is possible that the proposed mechanisms may all give rise to non-classical radio structures in different instances it might also be that one mechanism is more commonly responsible for off-axis emission than others.

While theoretical modeling studies of the proposed mechanisms is a way forward, progress requires detailed radio-optical-X-ray observations of sufficient quality that would allow much needed characterization of the population against which the models could be tested. A few studies in this direction (Capetti et al. 2002; Saripalli & Subrahmanyan 2009; Hodges-Kluck et al. 2010; Mezcua et al. 2011) have been carried out which reported the relatively high ellipticities of the XRG host ellipticals, host minor axis preference of the wings, host major axis proximity of the main lobes, prevalence of X-ray coronae surrounding XRG hosts and the relatively young ages of the hosts. Besides, Saripalli & Subrahmanyan have examined the observational data in the context of the formation of a wider class of radio structures and revealed a connection between XRGs and the parent class of sources with lobe distortions suggesting the possibility of a more widespread or common phenomenon at work in creating peculiar radio galaxy morphologies.

We present herein our attempt at resolving this issue using archival data on the sample of XRG candidates compiled by Cheung (2007), which forms a useful resource for taking the characterization studies further. In this paper we have imaged existing (as yet unanalyzed) archival VLA data of a subsample of his 100 XRG candidates. Here we present new maps of 52 radio galaxies, all of those for which archival L-band A-array and/or C-band B-array data exist. Each of the sources is discussed briefly. Several have been followed up in the optical and have redshifts available (Landt et al. 2010). We also provide new optical identifications for several of these sources.

In Section 3 we present our images of 52 sources, with overlays on the corresponding optical fields. Section 4 discusses the classification of the sources by the location of their deviant off-axis lobes. The goal is to identify those sources that we believe are candidates for "true X-shaped morphology." We define a "true X-shaped morphology" as one where the deviant off-axis emission is not traced to either of the main lobes of the radio galaxy and instead is seen as an independent transverse feature centered on the host. The sources in our sample that meet this definition are listed in Section 4.2; particularly good examples are J1043+3131 and J1327–0203. Our results are summarized in Section 5.

In Roberts et al. (2015) we discuss the implications of our results for the gravitational wave background.

2. OBSERVATIONS AND DATA ANALYSIS

The NRAO Data Archive was searched for historical VLA data on the 100 sources in Cheung's sample. We used all existing L-band observations in the A-array and C-band observations in the B-array. Thus the resulting images had a resolution of about one arcsec. The typical observation was a snapshot of a few minutes duration. The data were calibrated in AIPS using standard techniques and self-calibrated in DIFMAP, with final images made using the AIPS task IMAGR. In a few cases, no flux calibrator was available, so the flux scale was bootstrapped from observations of the phase calibration sources at nearby times.

3. RESULTS

For each source we provide contour images at each band for which historical VLA data were available, and overlays of the radio structures on optical images from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), or DSS II images if there is no SDSS image of the field (four cases). The contours are spaced by factors of $\sqrt{2}$ and run from the lowest contour levels to the peaks given in the individual captions. In the overlays, the contours are spaced by factors of two and some may be omitted to make the optical ID clearer. Below we provide notes describing interesting aspects for some of the sources.

In the new analysis, we present we detect compact cores in several sources. We detect 30 new radio cores while for 15 the new higher resolution imaging has failed to detect cores. All detected cores are seen at the IDs suggested by Cheung (2007) except in J1202+4915 where a core is detected but no ID is seen and in J0846+3956 where a likely core is present at a newly identified, faint object. Large-scale radio emission seen in the FIRST images is resolved out in several sources in the new imaging. For 14 sources there is at least 80% of the flux captured in our higher resolution maps where as for 12 sources more than 50% of the extended flux is missed. The observed properties of the sources are given in Table 1.

Table 1.  Observed Source Properties and Classifications

Name Figure Typea zb Scorec Stotc ${S}_{\mathrm{tot},\mathrm{FIRST}}$ d ${\theta }_{\mathrm{max}}$ e Inner Edges? Large-scale Emission
(J2000) Number     (mJy) (mJy) (mJy) (arcsec)   Resolved Out?f
Sources with "Bends From Inner Ends"
J0045+0021 2 432 509 31 yes?
J0113+0106 4 G 0.281 1.1(L) ID? 221 391 170 yes
J0211–0920 8 $\lt 0.21$ 69 180 56 yes yes
J0702+5002 9 G 0.0946 6.0 282 334 59 yes
J0846+3956 13 $\lt 2.$ 170 197 37 ?
J0859–0433 14 G 0.356 123 237 52 yes
J0917+0523 15 G 0.591 508 612 56 ?
J0924+4233 16 G 0.2274 2.7 169 292 56 yes
J0941–0143 17 G 0.382 $\lt 1.4$ 790 830 36 yes
J1005+1154 18 G 0.1656 0.84 149 205 42 yes
J1054+5521g 22 132 222 50
J1202+4915 25 0.51 72 104 38 yes
J1206+3812 26 BG 0.838 3.5(L), 1.9(C) 217 247 42 yes
J1207+3352g 27 G 0.0788 18.(L), 27.(C) 263 490 56 ..., dual morphology
J1210–0341 28 G 0.178, 0.26 0.16 93 151 42 yes but no gap
J1211+4539 29 209 232 44 yes
J1227–0742g 30 33 168 55
J1309–0012 34 G 0.419 14.(C) 663 1637 78 yes?
J1310+5458 35 G 0.356 11. 190 226 29 no
J1406–0154 40 G 0.641 $\lt 0.3$ 772 1143 58 yes
J1434+5906g 44 G 0.538 $\lt 1.8$ 255 315 33
J1456+2542g 45 G 0.536 $\lt 0.06$ 12 36 35
J1459+2903g 46 G 0.1460 7.1(L), 10.(C) 59 367 70 yes
J1600+2058 47 G 0.174 6.7 158 523 58 yes yes
J1606+4517 49 G 0.556 41 116 49 yes yes
Sources with "Bends From Outer Ends"
J0821+2922 11 G 0.246 $\lt 1.6$ 62 117 24  
J0845+4031 12 G 0.429 3.0 124 164 40  
J1135–0737 24 G 0.602 44 106 62   yes
J1253+3435 33 G 0.358 1.4 244 362 44  
J1342+2547 37 BG 0.585 8.7 274 365 33  
J1348+4411 39 G 0.267 0.62 96 158 36  
J1430+5217 43 BG 0.3671 10. 469 671 38  
J1656+3952 52 8.1 83 147 30  
Other Sources
J0001–0033 1 G 0.2469 2.4 32 73 28   yes
J0049+0059 3 G 0.3044 0.71 82 155 46  
J0143–0119 5 G 0.520 43.(L), 51.(C) 493 823 43  
J0144–0830 6 G 0.181 $\lt 0.5$ 24 47 34  
J0145–0159 7 G 0.1264 $\lt 0.5$ 25?? 272 46   yes
J0813+4347 10 G 0.1282 12. 288 333 51  
J1008+0030 19 G 0.0977 63. 107 484 36   yes
J1015+5944 20 BG 0.5271 4.9 203 221 38  
J1043+3131 21 G 0.0357 34.(L), 36.(C) 280 749 40   yes
J1111+4050 23 G 0.0737 53.(L), 11.(C) 740 819 41  
J1227+2155 31 $\lt 0.3$ 70 199 44   yes
J1228+2642 32 G 0.201 $\lt 0.4$ 126 185 42  
J1327–0203 36 G 0.183 21. 1085 1179 44  
J1345+5233 38 $\lt 0.92$ 33 71 29   yes
J1406+0657 41 BG 0.550 8.6 294 339 24  
J1408+0225 42 14. 163 244 26  
J1606+0000 48 G 0.059 54. 1889 2385 38  
J1614+2817 50 G 0.1069 7.4 271 424 39  
J1625+2705 51 BG 0.5259 28. 255 531 29   yes

Notes.

aG—narrow line radio galaxy, BG—broad line radio galaxy. bAll redshifts from Cheung (2007) or Cheung et al. (2009). cThis work. dFrom Cheung (2007). e Largest angular size in arcseconds. fVisibility less than 0.5. gFor these sources absence of core or ID and poor radio maps disallowed examining radio structural properties.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Below we provide notes to each of the sources where we also provide description of the morphology.

3.1. Notes on Individual Sources

J0001–0033 (Figure 1). Our new image shows the core clearly and a narrow, jet-like feature that connects it to the eastern lobe. Both lobes, although edge-brightened and well confined, lack compact hotspots, showing instead presence of recessed emission peaks. Diffuse extension to the north from the eastern lobe seen in the FIRST image is completely resolved out in our higher resolution map.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. J0001–0033. (Left) VLA image in the L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. In all of the figures the contours are spaced by factors of $\sqrt{2}$; in the overly every-other contour is skipped. Here the lowest contour = 0.1 mJy beam−1 and the peak = 2.36 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J0045+0021 (Figure 2). For this source we have presented images at two frequencies. The source, which appears as a classic XRG in the FIRST image continues to exhibit the diffuse orthogonally, oriented extensions in both our maps. The C-band map clearly shows the connection between the transverse extension and the eastern lobe, which also shows a sharp inner edge. A compact core midway between the lobes is detected in our C-band map.

Figure 2.

Figure 2. J0045+0021. (Top) (left) VLA image at L band and (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.3 mJy beam−1, peak = 178 mJy beam−1. (Bottom) (left) VLA image at C band and (right) VLA image overlaid on red DSS II image. Lowest contour = 0.125 mJy beam−1, peak = 60.7 mJy beam−1. The red DSS II plate does not show any candidate sources.

Standard image High-resolution image

J0049+0059 (Figure 3). Although the FIRST map shows an edge-brightened radio galaxy, our new map has revealed a complex structure for this source. Interestingly, the northern lobe is resolved into a source with an edge-brightened double structure. The lobe is extended along a position angle similar to the southern lobe however it is offset by nearly 10'' to the west. The offset northern lobe is connected to the core by a weak narrow extension. A narrow, linear feature is also seen extending SE from the core in the opposite direction. The southern lobe has a faint optical ID at the location of the peak at the leading end. We speculate whether the radio source is in fact a collection of three, extended and independent radio sources.

Figure 3.

Figure 3. J0049+0059. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.1 mJy beam−1, peak = 2.51 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J0113+0106 (Figure 4). The inversion symmetric transverse extensions seen in the FIRST image are also seen in the L-band image but are completely resolved out in the C-band image. In both the FIRST and L-band image the transverse extensions show inner edges and connect to respective lobes.

Figure 4.

Figure 4. J0113+0106. (Top) (left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.7 mJy beam−1, peak = 18.0 mJy beam−1. (Bottom) (left) VLA image at C band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.1 mJy beam−1, peak = 2.56 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J0143–0119 (Figure 5). There is impressive structure revealed in our map of this source. The extended diffuse region orthogonal to the source axis visible in the FIRST image is completely resolved out. A central bright knotty jet is seen with the peak at extreme west identified with a galaxy, making the source extremely asymmetric. The nature of the source is not clear.

Figure 5.

Figure 5. J0143–0119. (Top) (left) VLA image at L band and (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.2 mJy beam−1, peak = 44.4 mJy beam−1. (Bottom) (left) VLA image at C band and (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.1 mJy beam−1, peak = 50.3 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J0144–0830 (Figure 6). Our map does not reveal any compact features in this source, which is seen as a centrally bright X-shaped source in the FIRST image.

Figure 6.

Figure 6. J0144–0830. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.09 mJy beam−1, peak = 1.40 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J0145–0159 (Figure 7). Although the FIRST map shows an edge-brightened radio galaxy, our map shows only a central narrow twin-jet feature with all the extended emission seen in the FIRST map resolved out. The bright galaxy ID is located at the base of the northern jet. The map reveals a feature offset from the southern jet corresponding to the bright extended emission at the end of the southern lobe seen in the FIRST map. Our map reveals no hotspots in this edge-brightened source.

Figure 7.

Figure 7. J0145–0159. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.2 mJy beam−1, peak = 2.56 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J0211–0920 (Figure 8). The map reveals the NE galaxy constituting the galaxy pair to be the likely host. Two narrow jets are seen leading to the lobes where transverse emission is seen only for the NW lobe.

Figure 8.

Figure 8. J0211–0920. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.1 mJy beam−1, peak = 2.81 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J0702+5002 (Figure 9). The new map has revealed two distinct lobes on either side of a previously unseen central core. The lobes are at least as long as the source extent. Each of the lobes extends orthogonally in opposite directions. Neither of the lobes is seen to have compact hotspots.

Figure 9.

Figure 9. J0702+5002. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red DSS II image. Lowest contour = 0.2 mJy beam−1, peak = 7.17 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J0813+4347 (Figure 10). Our higher resolution map reveals a central triple structure (two lobes straddling a core) which is itself embedded in a much larger diffuse emission region.

Figure 10.

Figure 10. J0813+4347. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.125 mJy beam−1, peak = 12.0 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J0821+2922 (Figure 11). The map shows a compact core at the location of a faint galaxy straddled by two hotspots. The more compact NE hotspot is connected to it by a jet. The SW hotspot is offset to the west from the core-jet axis. The hotspots are accompanied by regions of diffuse emission that extend in opposite directions.

Figure 11.

Figure 11. J0821+2922. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.2 mJy beam−1, peak = 2.89 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J0845+4031 (Figure 12). The map reveals a very inversion-symmetric structure. There is an inner pair of emission peaks along an axis after which the respective outer (edge-brightened) lobes bend in opposite directions. Both outer lobes are associated with trailing faint emission extended again in opposite directions. We regard this source as a prime example of an AGN with rotating jets.

Figure 12.

Figure 12. J0845+4031. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.15 mJy beam−1, peak = 20.8 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J0846+3956 (Figure 13). The new map hints at a core at the location of a faint galaxy at the center. The transverse extensions are clearly seen to be associated with the individual lobes.

Figure 13.

Figure 13. J0846+3956. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.2 mJy beam−1, peak = 21.4 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J0859–0433 (Figure 14). Our higher resolution map fails to detect a core in this source. The two hotspots are well mapped and the transverse emission to the north is clearly seen to connect to the W hotspot. The diffuse emission feature to the south is seen to have a bounded appearance with clear edges.

Figure 14.

Figure 14. J0859–0433. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red DSS II image. Lowest contour = 0.2 mJy beam−1, peak = 23.4 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J0917+0523 (Figure 15). This source is very similar to J0859–0433. No core is detected in our map. The two hotspots are well mapped, although the extended transverse emission is only partially imaged.

Figure 15.

Figure 15. J0917+0523. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.6 mJy beam−1, peak = 117 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J0924+4233 (Figure 16). No distinct core is seen in the map. The bright ID is straddled to the east by a core-like feature and to the west by a short terminated jet. The structure suggests a restarted AGN activity. The diffuse lobe emission to the south is traced clearly and seen to be linked with the W lobe. The northern diffuse extension is mostly resolved out.

Figure 16.

Figure 16. J0924+4233. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.15 mJy beam−1, peak = 5.40 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J0941–0143 (Figure 17). We detect a weak core at the location of a galaxy ID. The source structure is revealed to be inversion-symmetric about the ID. The prominent SE extension to the northern lobe is only partially imaged.

Figure 17.

Figure 17. J0941–0143. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.60 mJy beam−1, peak = 73.1 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1005+1154 (Figure 18). The map detects compact emission at the location of an optical object. It makes the source highly asymmetric in extent. The northern lobe reaches most of the way to the core along the radio axis before appearing to change direction to the west well ahead of the core. The offset emission shows a well-bounded inner edge.

Figure 18.

Figure 18. J1005+1154. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.09 mJy beam−1, peak = 3.77 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1008+0030 (Figure 19). The halo-like diffuse emission in which a central radio source is embedded (as seen in the FIRST map) is completely resolved out. Instead the map reveals a bright core from which a short bright jet is seen extending toward the NE hotspot.

Figure 19.

Figure 19. J1008+0030. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.3 mJy beam−1, peak = 63.5 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1015+5944 (Figure 20). The source is revealed to be a narrow edge-brightened radio galaxy. The northern diffuse extension is detected as a narrow feature with a sharp inner edge.

Figure 20.

Figure 20. J1015+5944. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.2 mJy beam−1, peak = 98.1 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1043+3131 (Figure 21). The source structure is well imaged in the new maps, which show a compact core connected by a pair of narrow straight jets to two compact hotspots at the extreme ends of the source. The core coincides with a centrally located and brighter of three galaxies that lie in a line along the source axis. Our map reveals a well-bounded wide feature oriented orthogonal to the source axis. An interesting, narrow jet-like feature is seen to the west associated with the core along the axis of this broad diffuse feature.

Figure 21.

Figure 21. J1043+3131. (Top) (left) VLA image at L band and (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.4 mJy beam−1, peak = 34.0 mJy beam−1. (Bottom) (left) VLA image at C band and (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.08 mJy beam−1, peak = 44.6 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1054+5521 (Figure 22). The map does not reveal a compact core, although we note a weak source between the lobes at the location of a very faint object. The edge-brightened lobes extend along axes that are offset from each other. The off axis emission connected to the well-bounded eastern lobe shows a sharp inner edge.

Figure 22.

Figure 22. J1054+5521. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.175 mJy beam−1, peak = 14.1 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1111+4050 (Figure 23). The source is clearly seen to be a radio galaxy with bent jets, a likely wide-angle tail source.

Figure 23.

Figure 23. J1111+4050. (Top) (left) VLA image at L band and (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 1.0 mJy beam−1, peak = 73.3 mJy beam−1. (Bottom) (left) VLA image at C band and (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.125 mJy beam−1, peak = 11.3 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1135–0737 (Figure 24). A weak hotspot is seen associated with the north lobe, which is accompanied by lobe emission to its east, whereas in the south lobe a narrow extended feature is seen accompanied by lobe emission to the west. No core is detected in the new map. However an optical object is seen along the axis formed by the northern hotspot and the narrow, elongated feature in the south.

Figure 24.

Figure 24. J1135–0737. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red DSS II image. Lowest contour = 0.2 mJy beam−1, peak = 1.99 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1202+4915 (Figure 25). The edge-brightened lobes are both revealed to have extended hotspot structures at their ends. The new map also reveals a compact radio core, although no optical ID is visible. The diffuse extensions to the lobes are mostly resolved out especially that associated with the southern lobe.

Figure 25.

Figure 25. J1202+4915. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.15 mJy beam−1, peak = 7.84 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1206+3812 (Figure 26). The maps have revealed the hotspots in finer detail and the bridge emission leading from them along the source axis toward the compact core.

Figure 26.

Figure 26. J1206+3812. (Top) (left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.2 mJy beam−1, peak = 47.0 mJy beam−1. (Bottom) (left) VLA image at C band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.3 mJy beam−1, peak = 15.6 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1207+3352 (Figure 27). This source appears to be one where offset emission is seen originating both from inner end (of both lobes in the FIRST map) as well as outer end (of the NW lobe in the shown figure). The two recessed inner peaks in the two lobes are aligned with the core whereas the two outer peaks are separately aligned with the core. The two axes are separated by less than 10°.

Figure 27.

Figure 27. J1207+3352. (Top) (left) VLA image at L band and (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.3 mJy beam−1, peak = 25.2 mJy beam−1. (Bottom) (left) VLA image at C band and (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.1 mJy beam−1, peak = 27.5 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1210–0341 (Figure 28). The new map reveals sharply bounded edge-brightened lobes connected to inversion-symmetric transverse emission features. A weak core is seen associated with the central bright galaxy connected to the SE hotspot by a jet.

Figure 28.

Figure 28. J1210–0341. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.1 mJy beam−1, peak = 2.95 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1211+4539 (Figure 29). This source is similar to J1206+3812 (Figure 26). The two lobes have high axial ratios, which have short orthogonal extensions close to the center. No core is detected in the new map.

Figure 29.

Figure 29. J1211+4539. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.2 mJy beam−1, peak = 43.6 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1227–0742 (Figure 30). The map misses much of the extended flux seen in the FIRST image. While a hotspot is detected at the SE lobe end no core is detected nor is a hotspot seen in the western lobe. The map shows a transverse emission feature associated with the SE lobe.

Figure 30.

Figure 30. J1227–0742. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.18 mJy beam−1, peak = 0.86 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1227+2155 (Figure 31). A prominent feature revealed in the map is a narrow, extended arc of emission running orthogonal to another narrow and elongated emission with prominent emission peaks, a likely radio galaxy. At its center a radio core is detected at the location of the optical object. The physical association of the curved extended feature with the radio galaxy is unclear.

Figure 31.

Figure 31. J1227+2155. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.1 mJy beam−1, peak = 3.74 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1228+2642 (Figure 32). Our map reveals distinct hotspots at the extremities of the source. Although a distinct core is not seen, a local emission peak in the center coincides with a bright elliptical galaxy. The lobes are well-bounded but are not distinct and instead form a continuous bridge between the two hotspots.

Figure 32.

Figure 32. J1228+2642. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.08 mJy beam−1, peak = 4.37 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1253+3435 (Figure 33). A distinct core and clear hotspots are revealed for this source. The NE lobe has a pair of distinct hotspots at its extremity where as the SW lobe has an extended emission peak at the lobe end indicative of a pair of hotspots. The source is skewed, with both hotspot pairs displaced to the east with respect to the core. The lobes show sharp boundaries.

Figure 33.

Figure 33. J1253+3435. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.09 mJy beam−1, peak = 15.8 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1309–0012 (Figure 34). As seen in the FIRST image, transverse emission is seen associated only with the western lobe; this has a sharp inner edge that is almost orthogonal to the source axis.

Figure 34.

Figure 34. J1309–0012. (Left) VLA image at C band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.3 mJy beam−1, peak = 113 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1310+5458 (Figure 35). A strong core and hotspots are seen in our high-resolution map. The source has prominent lobes with low axial ratio.

Figure 35.

Figure 35. J1310+5458. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.2 mJy beam−1, peak = 11.4 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1327–0203 (Figure 36). Our new map reveals a central core. The map shows prominent, well-bounded lobes that are devoid of compact hotspots. The transverse, central protrusions are also seen to be well bounded.

Figure 36.

Figure 36. J1327–0203. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.2 mJy beam−1, peak = 20.9 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1342+2547 (Figure 37). The source shows several signs of projection effects: strong core, asymmetry in the separation of the hotspots from the core, and the presence of a narrow jet on the side of the more distant hotspot. The southern lobe is traced as a distinct, broad feature that is extended at an angle of nearly 120° from the source axis.

Figure 37.

Figure 37. J1342+2547. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.3 mJy beam−1, peak = 72.5 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1345+5233 (Figure 38). The source is revealed to have two edge-brightened lobes. A weak core may be detected at the location of the central faint object.

Figure 38.

Figure 38. J1345+5233. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.09 mJy beam−1, peak = 0.92 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1348+4411 (Figure 39). The map reveals a non-collinear, edge-brightened source, where the two hotspots lie along axes that make an angle of nearly 30° to each other. The presumed jet to the north appears to bend by nearly 40° to the east at a location about halfway to the northern hotspot. The lobes steer away from these respective axes with the northern lobe extended away by more than 90°.

Figure 39.

Figure 39. J1348+4411. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.07 mJy beam−1, peak = 5.96 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1406–0154. (Figure 40). Bright hotspots are seen at the extremities of the lobes. No core is detected, although there is a faint object close to the radio axis between the two lobes. Both lobes are well confined including the two transverse emission regions, which are also separated by a significant gap in emission.

Figure 40.

Figure 40. J1406–0154. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.3 mJy beam−1, peak = 57.6 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1406+0657 (Figure 41). Our new map reveals two bright hotspots at the lobe ends. Lobes are not seen as distinct components and instead a tapering broad swathe of emission, which is centrally located, is seen across the source axis. A weak core may be present at the location of a galaxy close to the source axis.

Figure 41.

Figure 41. J1406+0657. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.2 mJy beam−1, peak = 71.5 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1408+0225 (Figure 42). The almost featureless FIRST source is revealed to have a complex structure in our high-resolution map. Several compact sources and emission peaks are seen embedded within a large emission region. A prominent elongated core is seen at the location of the galaxy at the center. The elongation is along the direction to the hotspot at the northeast. Interestingly the core is located on an axis formed by another pair of hotspots at an angle of 60°. Higher resolution observations are required to understand the complex structure.

Figure 42.

Figure 42. J1408+0225. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.1 mJy beam−1, peak = 14.0 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1430+5217 (Figure 43). Our high-resolution map has resolved the central emission region into a pair of peaks one of which (to the SE) coincides with a galaxy. The second peak, which is slightly less compact, could be part of a jet to the west. Further to the west along the axis of the twin peaks lies a compact hotspot which also shows a partial collimated feature along the axis toward the pair of peaks. The bright region at the leading end of the eastern lobe may be showing a complex hotspot. This hotspot region does not lie on the source axis formed by the core, jet and the western hotspot. However, the eastern lobe shows an elongated feature along the axis offset from the rest of the lobe. Both lobes deflect away nearly orthogonally from the source axis.

Figure 43.

Figure 43. J1430+5217. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.2 mJy beam−1, peak = 40.2 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1434+5906 (Figure 44). There are two bright and compact hotspots at the extremities along with a swathe of broad emission orthogonal to the source axis mostly seen on one side. A weak core may be present at the location of the faint object in the center.

Figure 44.

Figure 44. J1434+5906. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.15 mJy beam−1, peak = 47.3 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1456+2542 (Figure 45). The map shows an edge-brightened morphology for the source. Neither of the lobes however is found to have a compact hotspot nor is a core or jet seen, suggesting a relic nature for the source. The extended diffuse emission region is resolved out in the new map.

Figure 45.

Figure 45. J1456+2542. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.11 mJy beam−1, peak = 1.16 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1459+2903 (Figure 46). See Figure 46. The core emission is elongated with jet-like extensions on either side of a bright optical ID. Although edge-brightened, no compact hotspots are seen. Much of the extended emission is resolved out in our map.

Figure 46.

Figure 46. J1459+2903. (Top) (left) VLA image at L band and (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.2 mJy beam−1, peak = 8.67 mJy beam−1. (Bottom) (left) VLA image at C band and (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.1 mJy beam−1, peak = 10.1 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1600+2058 (Figure 47). Although the source is edge brightened, the lobes are found to have only relatively weak and recessed emission peaks. Both lobes are narrow with multiple emission peaks. Both off axis emission regions are sharply bounded and there is a clear emission gap between the southern lobe and the core.

Figure 47.

Figure 47. J1600+2058. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.2 mJy beam−1, peak = 6.89 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1606+0000 (Figure 48). Our new map fails to detect any of the extended emission which is distributed skewed with respect to the main source in the FIRST map (see Hodges-Kluck et al. 2010 for a detailed study of this source). Our map reveals a largely well confined source (also seen previously) except along a direction (through the core) that is nearly orthogonal with respect to the source axis. At these locations there are two protrusions on either side that may form the base of the elongated feature seen in the FIRST map.

Figure 48.

Figure 48. J1606+0000. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.2 mJy beam−1, peak = 82.0 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1606+4517 (Figure 49). The edge brightened lobes are found to have compact hotspots at their extremities. The transverse inner extension to the southern lobe has a sharp inner edge. Much of the extended emission seen in the FIRST map is resolved out.

Figure 49.

Figure 49. J1606+4517. (Top) (left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.3 mJy beam−1, peak = 3.21 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1614+2817 (Figure 50). A narrow channel is seen to run through the length of the source, ending in weak and bounded emission peaks at the leading ends. The source is well-bounded with two transverse extensions with only the northern extension orthogonal and centered on the core.

Figure 50.

Figure 50. J1614+2817. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.2 mJy beam−1, peak = 8.02 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1625+2705 (Figure 51). The quite featureless FIRST source is found to have a wealth of structure in our map. Two compact hotspots are seen. The SE hotspot is isolated appearing almost as a background source. The bright core, jet pointing to the farther and stronger SE hotspot reflect the effects of projection in the broad line AGN. A compact isolated hotspot is seen at the SE end along the axis.

Figure 51.

Figure 51. J1625+2705. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.7 mJy beam−1, peak = 28.0 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

J1656+3952 (Figure 52). A classic inversion symmetric structure is revealed for this source. A bright core is seen straddled by two edge-brightened lobes to which it is connected by narrow jets. The two lobes extend away from the source axis in opposite, orthogonal directions.

Figure 52.

Figure 52. J1656+3952. (Left) VLA image at L band, (right) VLA image overlaid on red SDSS image. Lowest contour = 0.2 mJy beam−1, peak = 8.06 mJy beam−1.

Standard image High-resolution image

4. DISCUSSION

Although a persistent structure associated with extended radio galaxies is that of two lobes straddling an elliptical galaxy (often also associated with a radio core), deviations from the radio axis are common. These deviations are most often associated with the diffuse lobes, although jets are also found to show sharp bends. The sample of 52 sources observed with the VLA and which forms the data presented herein is a subset of the 100 low axial-ratio FIRST radio sources compiled by Cheung (2007) that were chosen to be candidates for XRG morphologies (Cheung et al. 2009), displaying recognized signs of X-shapes. The sample has also been observed in the optical and spectra and redshifts have been obtained for most (Landt et al. 2010). The redshift range for this subsample is 0.05–0.8. The new VLA observations were aimed at obtaining structural details. Our analysis of follow-up high resolution observations of these sources, selected on the basis of their low axial ratios, provides an excellent opportunity to (1) examine the types of different structural distortions in radio galaxies, (2) examine their occurrence rates and, most importantly, (3) determine the fraction that might be classified as a genuine X-shaped radio source. The observed properties of the sources are given in Table 1 and derived properties in Table 2.

Table 2.  Derived Source Properties

Name Lproja fcoreb
  (kpc) (%)
Sources with "Bends From Inner Ends"
J0045+0021
J0113+0106 950 0.28
J0211–0920 0.12
J0702+5002 110 1.8
J0846+3956 $\lt 1$
J0859–0433 370
J0917+0523 650
J0924+4233 250 0.92
J0941–0143 280 $\lt 0.2$
J1005+1154 140 0.41
J1054+5521
J1202+4915 0.49
J1206+3812 700 1.4
J1207+3352 88 3.7
J1210–0341 150 0.11
J1211+4539
J1227–0742
J1309–0012 650
J1310+5458 210 4.9
J1406–0154 $\lt 0.03$
J1434+5906 350 $\lt 0.6$
J1456+2542 370 $\lt 0.2$
J1459+2903 1.9
J1600+2058 200 1.3
J1606+4517 540
Sources with "Bends From Outer Ends"
J0821+2922 $\lt 1.4$
J0845+4031 340 1.8
J1135–0737 740
J1253+3435 0.39
J1342+2547 390 2.4
J1348+4411 190 0.39
J1430+5217 280 1.5
J1656+3952 5.5
Other Sources
J0001–0033 140 3.3
J0049+0059 280 0.46
J0143–0119 5.2
J0144–0830 120 $\lt 1$
J0145–0159 120 $\lt 0.2$
J0813+4347 130 3.6
J1008+0030 71 13.
J1015+5944 400 2.2
J1043+3131 28 4.5
J1111+4050 60 6.5
J1227+2155 $\lt 0.2$
J1228+2642 170 $\lt 0.2$
J1327–0203 160 1.8
J1345+5233 $\lt 1$
J1406+0657 270 $\lt 3$
J1408+0225 6.3
J1606+0000 44 2.3
J1614+2817 83 1.7
J1625+2705 300 5.3

Notes.

aProjected size in kiloparsecs. bCore fraction in percent, L band.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

4.1. Classifying Radio Lobe Distortions

Although several sources appear, in the imaging of the new VLA data, to have well-resolved structures, in a significant number of new high resolution images the diffuse large-scale radio emission, which is seen in the FIRST images presented by (Cheung 2007), is completely resolved out (e.g., J0143–0119). Among the well-imaged sources the new observations reveal structural distortions where lobe deviations appear to occur at "strategic" locations in the radio galaxy, either from the outer lobe ends (with or without hotspots) and extending away from the radio axis at large angles or from the inner lobe ends closer to the host galaxy. In each case the off-axis emission appears connected and a continuation of one of the two individual radio lobes. The deviations in the two lobes are mostly inversion symmetric (about the center or host galaxy or radio core). In a small fraction of sources the off-axis emission in the central part is in the form of a common band of emission running through the host galaxy or radio core. A few radio galaxies have jets seen to be bent into an "integral" (gradual "S") sign shape.

These off-axis deviations to radio galaxy structures, which otherwise exhibit basic twin-lobe morphologies, represent influences that need to be understood. Of course, effects of projection also enter and need to be considered in understanding the origin of the distortions. In an early study, Leahy & Williams (1984) noted and categorized the different kinds of distortions found in the well-studied 3CR radio galaxy sample and attempted to relate them with thermal halo gas associated with host galaxies at the centers as well as with any previous beam-activity episodes experienced by the AGN. However, lobe deviations seen originating from the outer ends of radio galaxies, far from the host galaxy influence, may have different underlying physical mechanisms at work. In the case of radio sources with a single broad swathe of emission at the centers that appear as a central band of emission a mechanism independent of the ongoing activity has also been proposed (e.g., Merritt & Ekers 2002).

4.2. The Nature of Low Axial Ratio Sources

Examination of the higher resolution images in conjunction with low resolution images allows us to gain insights into factors that may be causing deviations from the simple classical twin-lobe structure (thereby rendering a low axial ratio to the sources at low resolution) that is expected in the beam model. Our advantage in this exercise is that we have a fairly large sample of radio galaxies, all of which were selected in a uniform manner from a single survey and all of which have now been imaged at higher resolution with a similar setup (in frequency and array) allowing us to also note the occurrence rate of different types of structures responsible for the low axial ratios. We have chosen three categories for classifying the structures of the 52 radio sources: sources where the non-collinear structures are caused by features originating at the inner ends of lobes, outer ends of lobes and the third category which includes the rest where neither condition holds.

Among the 52 low-axial-ratio sources, there are 25 sources where the deviating structures originate at the inner ends of lobes and eight where the origin appears to be at the outer ends of lobes (see Table 1). The remaining 19 have structures that remain unclassified in this respect. In nearly all of the 33 sources with off-axis deviations connected to the individual lobes (whether at the inner ends or outer ends) the distortions are in opposite directions except in one case, J1434+5906 (with lobe extension at the inner end), where the deviant emission is mostly on one side. The sample sources are predominantly edge-brightened FR-II type and only seven source morphologies are either of FR-I type or blends of multiple radio sources or remain unclear.

Among the 19 radio sources that fall in neither category there are some for which the data do not allow for classifying their low-axial ratio structures (e.g., J0001–0033, J0049+0059, J0143–0119, J0145–0159, J0813+4347, J1227–0742, J1227+2155, and J1228+2642). In these cases we will need to pursue further, higher, resolution imaging.

Among the 19 sources there are 11 sources where there is a possibility of an independent transverse feature centered on the host (J0144–0830, J1008+0030, J1015+5944, J1043+3131, J1327–0203, J1345+5233, J1406+0657, J1408+0225, J1606+0000, J1614+2817, and J1625+2705). In all these sources there is extended transverse emission seen either in the FIRST image (but not imaged in our high resolution maps) or in our maps which cannot be traced to either of the two lobes in the radio galaxy. Given the lack of association of this extended emission with the radio galaxy components (whether individual lobes or hotspots as seen in the two groups discussed above) we consider these 11 sources as potential candidates for "genuine" XRGs, although better imaging would help clarify the nature of the extended emission in these sources further.

4.3. Characteristics of Sources Identified with Inner-end and Outer-end Lobe Deviations

Having classified the different types of deviations that are revealed when low-axial ratio sources are imaged at higher resolution, we attempt to characterize the properties of sources in the two groups, one with sources having inner-end deviations and the other with sources having outer-end deviations (see Table 1 for the two groups of sources listed separately). For this we have used different measures and associations like the projected physical separation (where possible) between the locations of deflections in each lobe, the fractional extents of the deflections, the presence or absence of a radio core, fractional core flux, whether the sources have FR-I, FR-II or hybrid-type structures and the presence of broad emission lines in the optical spectra (where available).

Among the 25 sources where the deviations occur at the inner ends of lobes, we have measured structural parameters (from radio maps) for 19. For the remainder, the exercise was hampered by the absence of a core and host galaxy or poor quality of the radio image (see Table 1). The variety in radio structures lead to the following inferences.

  • 1.  
    All 25 sources with inner-end deviations (Table 1) have FR-II morphologies.
  • 2.  
    Within the limits of sensitivity more often than not the transverse deviations on the two sides are unequal in extent.
  • 3.  
    Emission gaps between the location where the transverse deviation occurs and the cores are common. Fourteen out of 19 show distinct inner edges to the deviations which are also separated by recognizable or significant gaps (see Table 1 for the sources that show sharp edges). The physical extents of the gaps are at most 60 kpc from the center of the host galaxy.
  • 4.  
    In sources with clear hotspots on the two sides, we detect no discernible correlation or anti-correlation between the presence of a stronger hotspot on one side and the size of the gap or extent of the off-axis emission on that side.
  • 5.  
    In five cases (0211–0920, 0702+5002, 0859–0433, 0941–0143, and 1054+5521) the transverse deviations extend to as much or more than their respective lobe extents, at least on one side. In three cases (J0702+5002, J0859–0433, and 0941–0143) both transverse deviations have fractional extents exceeding unity. It may be noted that our measurements of the wing extents is mostly based on the lower resolution FIRST survey images.

The fact that the inner-end deviations are not collinear and centered on the host and are instead separated by clear gaps implies that they may not be representing visible lobes created in a previous activity epoch or even channels left behind in a previous epoch and which are now made visible by new lobe plasma that has flowed into them.

We have also measured the position angles of the major axes of the host elliptical galaxies for a few of the sources in this group. The purpose was to examine if sources with inner-end deviations adhered to the same tendency of the radio axis being closer to the host major axis as shown by XRGs (Capetti et al. 2002; Saripalli & Subrahmanyan 2009) and the subset of 3CR radio galaxies with central distortions to the lobes (Saripalli & Subrahmanyan 2009). With the prevalence of central lobe distortions in radio galaxy samples and the adherence to the same correlation in radio-optical axes as shown by the much longer winged XRGs the latter authors had suggested a generic physical mechanism like deflection of backflows by thermal gaseous halos (Leahy & Williams 1984) rather than jet axis flips as the mechanism that may be causing the commonly seen small-extent central distortions as well as the more extreme ones seen in XRGs. For large angle flips in jet axis to be the responsible mechanism it would require axis flips to be commonly occurring and would need the jet axis to flip from minor axis to the major axis (see discussion of the contending XRG models by Saripalli & Subrahmanyan 2009).

Measurements were possible for sources whose hosts were bright; values have been noted only for those that were clearly non-circular in appearance. For a total of eight sources it was possible to measure the major axis position angle (we used the ELLIPSE task in IRAF). For each of the sources we also measured the position angle of the radio axis. The axes were defined by the line joining the core and the hotspots in each of the lobes; where the core was not seen the axis was defined to be the line between the (likely) host galaxy and hotspots. For this group of galaxies the radio axes are within $20^\circ $ of their respective host major axes in six out of eight sources. This correspondence between host major axis and radio axis is consistent with that found previously for a subsample of 3CR radio galaxies with off-axis and inversion symmetric lobe distortions (Saripalli & Subrahmanyan 2009) suggesting the possibility of a generic mechanism like backflow deflection underlying commonly seen off-axis lobe distortions as well as possibly also in the more extreme XRGs.

For the smaller sample of eight sources having outer-end deviations, all of which have FR-II morphologies, this exercise was possible only for two sources and in both cases the radio axes are within $30^\circ $ of the host major axes.

Three out of eight outer-end deviation sources (J0845+4031, J1253+3435, and J1430+5217) show structures in their lobes that may be attributed to a drift or rotation in axis. In J0845+4031 each lobe has corresponding emission peaks and trailing emission in opposing directions that form a clear "S" with the inner peaks forming an axis with the core. In J1253+3435 the edge-brightened lobes have twin or extended hotspots at the lobe ends accompanied by sharp-edged oppositely extending lobe emission, whereas in J1430+5217 there are several emission peaks and collimated extensions on either side indicating axis change besides the nearly transverse twin-hotspots at the lobe ends and oppositely extended trailing lobe emission. In the "neither" category of sources, no source shows signs of axis rotation. Interestingly 1 one of the 25 inner-end deviation sources (J1207+3352) shows circumstantial evidence of axis rotation.

Two of the "inner-end" deviation sources, J0924+4233 and J1459+2903, show clear signs that the AGN beam activity has in the past ceased and restarted; their structures display an inner-double source embedded within a large pair of outer lobes that are devoid of compact hotspots.

4.4. Physical Implications

Whether the transverse structures originate at the inner ends or outer ends of lobes can have quite different physical significance. Transverse structures originating at the inner ends of lobes are also seen in several known XRGs. Given the observational characteristics displayed by XRGs (described in Section 1; Saripalli & Subrahmanyan 2009) the axis-flip model would require the axis to mostly flip from host minor axis direction to near host major-axis direction, would require the minor mergers responsible for axis flips or drifts to also displace the galaxy by several tens of kiloparsecs and for the relic emission to remain visible when often there is a deficit of relic radio galaxies, for the relic lobes to always have edge-darkened (FR-I) morphology and for the active main lobes to mostly have FR-II morphology. Where as the prevalence of inner-end distortions to radio galaxies (although less pronounced in lateral extent than in the more extreme wings in XRGs), the continuum of properties related to orientations of radio axis and optical axis (Saripalli & Subrahmanyan 2009) between the two populations of radio galaxies, the presence of X-ray halos with major axis close to host major axis (Kraft et al. 2005; Hodges-Kluck et al. 2010), the mostly FR-II morphology of the main lobes, the clear connection seen between the off axis distortions and individual lobes, the separation between the off axis features and the often sharp inner edges to the off axis emission all are more simply explained via models that suggest backflowing lobe synchrotron plasma getting deflected in the thermal halos associated with the host galaxies (Capetti et al. 2002; Saripalli & Subrahmanyan 2009; Hodges-Kluck & Reynolds 2011). In the case of off-axis emission connected to outer ends of lobes the wings might represent relic synchrotron plasma deposited in outer lobe regions as the jets drifted in position angle, perhaps in a precessing beam.

Neither of the two physical mechanisms can be supported at present via evidence other than circumstantial but simulations have been carried out for the former mechanism (Capetti et al. 2002; Hodges-Kluck & Reynolds 2011) as well as for reproducing the inner-lobe deviations via radio axis precession where effects of projection and light-travel time differences play a major role (Gong et al. 2011). It is nevertheless important to identify such sources that may be used as test-beds for mechanisms such as backflow deflection and radio axis rotation that are fundamental to understanding the AGN central engine and stability of its black hole spin axis.

5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

We have analyzed 1.4 and 5 GHz archival VLA continuum data on a sample of 52 FIRST radio sources selected on the basis of low-axial ratio radio structures. Our primary results are as follow.

  • 1.  
    The exercise has allowed examination of features that contribute to off-axis emission in radio sources that is not expected to naturally arise in the standard beam model for radio galaxies.
  • 2.  
    Our higher resolution imaging has aided in characterizing low-axial radio sources into ones where the off-axis emission is traced to individual radio lobes and ones where it instead appears as a common swathe of emission through the center and across the source axis.
  • 3.  
    A large fraction of the sample (60%) constitutes sources where the off-axis emission is traced to individual lobes.
  • 4.  
    Eleven sources (20% of our sample) have been identified as potentially genuine XRG candidates. Although the parent sample from which the 52-source subsample (used here) has been drawn is itself drawn from those FIRST fields that had "sufficient dynamic range in the images to be able to see extended low surface brightness wings" (Cheung 2007), we cannot discount sources with even fainter extended wings that FIRST survey may have missed.

The implications of these results for the predicted gravitational wave background are discussed in Roberts et al. (2015).

The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation, operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc. Funding for the SDSS and SDSS-II has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Japanese Monbukagakusho, the Max Planck Society, and the Higher Education Funding Council for England. The SDSS web site is http://www.sdss.org/. D.H.R. gratefully acknowledges the support of the William R. Kenan, Jr. Charitable Trust. We thank Anand Sahay who assisted in the derivation of host galaxy position angles. The anonymous referee is thanked for helpful comments that led to an improved presentation.

Facilities: VLA (data archives, project codes: AB808, AC406, AC4450, AC572, AC818, AD100, AF91, AF918, AG143B, AJ250, AL252, AM67, AM222, AM364, AO80, AO80D, AP326, AR123, VC35).

Please wait… references are loading.
10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/7