This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.

Articles

WIDE COOL AND ULTRACOOL COMPANIONS TO NEARBY STARS FROM Pan-STARRS 1

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and

Published 2014 August 22 © 2014. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Niall R. Deacon et al 2014 ApJ 792 119 DOI 10.1088/0004-637X/792/2/119

0004-637X/792/2/119

ABSTRACT

We present the discovery of 57 wide (>5'') separation, low-mass (stellar and substellar) companions to stars in the solar neighborhood identified from Pan-STARRS 1 (PS1) data and the spectral classification of 31 previously known companions. Our companions represent a selective subsample of promising candidates and span a range in spectral type of K7–L9 with the addition of one DA white dwarf. These were identified primarily from a dedicated common proper motion search around nearby stars, along with a few as serendipitous discoveries from our Pan-STARRS 1 brown dwarf search. Our discoveries include 23 new L dwarf companions and one known L dwarf not previously identified as a companion. The primary stars around which we searched for companions come from a list of bright stars with well-measured parallaxes and large proper motions from the Hipparcos catalog (8583 stars, mostly A–K dwarfs) and fainter stars from other proper motion catalogs (79170 stars, mostly M dwarfs). We examine the likelihood that our companions are chance alignments between unrelated stars and conclude that this is unlikely for the majority of the objects that we have followed-up spectroscopically. We also examine the entire population of ultracool (>M7) dwarf companions and conclude that while some are loosely bound, most are unlikely to be disrupted over the course of ∼10 Gyr. Our search increases the number of ultracool M dwarf companions wider than 300 AU by 88% and increases the number of L dwarf companions in the same separation range by 82%. Finally, we resolve our new L dwarf companion to HIP 6407 into a tight (0farcs13, 7.4 AU) L1+T3 binary, making the system a hierarchical triple. Our search for these key benchmarks against which brown dwarf and exoplanet atmosphere models are tested has yielded the largest number of discoveries to date.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. INTRODUCTION

Wide (≳100 AU) binary companions have long been used as a tool for identifying and studying faint stellar and substellar objects. Such systems are relatively common, with at least 4.4% of solar-type stars having a companion wider than 2000 AU (Tokovinin & Lépine 2012) and ∼25% having companions wider than 100 AU (Raghavan et al. 2010). Indeed, the Sun's closest stellar neighbor, Proxima Centauri, is a ∼15,000 AU common proper motion companion to Alpha Centauri (Innes 1915). These objects are an important population for understanding models of binary star formation. The widest systems may have been formed by capture within a young cluster (Kouwenhoven et al. 2010), a mechanism that has been used to explain the apparent increase in the number of companions per log separation bin at separations over 20,000 AU (Dhital et al. 2010). Another possibility is that these objects formed closer in and were pushed out to wider orbits by three-body interactions (Delgado-Donate et al. 2004; Umbreit et al. 2005; Reipurth & Mikkola 2012). In this scenario the wide companion fraction should be higher for close binary systems. Indeed Law et al. (2010) have found that 45$^{+18}_{-16}$% of wide M dwarf systems were resolved as hierarchical triples with high-resolution imaging.

Wide binaries also provide test cases for characterizing stellar and substellar properties. As these systems likely formed from the same birth cluster, the companions will have the same metallicity and age as their host stars. Hence if one component has these parameters determined, the values can be applied to the other component. For example, wide M dwarf companions to FGK stars have been used as calibrators for spectroscopic determinations of M dwarf metallicity relations (Rojas-Ayala et al. 2010; Mann et al. 2013a, 2014). This "benchmarking" process is even more important for substellar objects as brown dwarfs lack a stable internal energy source and hence exhibit a degeneracy between their mass, luminosity, and age. For substellar companions this degeneracy can be broken using the age of the primary (in combination with the bolometric luminosity derived from their absolute magnitude and spectrum of the secondary) to estimate the radius, mass, and effective temperature of the secondary from evolutionary models. This effective temperature can then be compared to that derived from model fits to the secondary's spectrum, testing the agreement between atmospheric and evolutionary models (e.g., Saumon et al. 2007; Deacon et al. 2012b). There are also a handful of systems where the ultracool14 secondary itself is a binary. Such very rare systems are not simply "age benchmarks" (Liu et al. 2008); since the mass of the secondary is measured dynamically, they provide the opportunity for even more stringent tests of theoretical models (Dupuy et al. 2009).

As a result of their importance, wide substellar companions have been an active area of study in recent years. Many substellar companions have been identified as byproducts of larger searches for brown dwarfs (e.g., Burningham et al. 2009) or by matching known brown dwarfs with catalogs of known stars (e.g., Faherty et al. 2010; Dupuy & Liu 2012). Dedicated large-scale companion searches such as Pinfield et al. (2006) are more rare. A summary of discoveries prior to 2010 is presented in Faherty et al. (2010). Since then wide-field surveys such as Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS; Ahn et al. 2012; see studies by Zhang et al. 2010; Dhital et al. 2010) and WISE (Wright et al. 2010; see work by Luhman et al. 2012; Wright et al. 2013) have been used to identify wide companions to stars. As these surveys are either single epoch or taken over a short period of time, they often require additional data sets, such as Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS; Skrutskie et al. 2006), to allow the identification of companions from their common proper motion with the primary. Hence the ideal tool for identifying wide, low-mass companions to stars is a red-sensitive, wide-field, multi-epoch survey.

Pan-STARRS 1 is a wide-field 1.8 m telescope situated on Haleakala on Maui in the Hawaiian Islands. Run by a consortium of astronomical research institutions, it has been surveying the sky north of δ = −30° since 2010 May. Just over half of the telescope's operating time is reserved for the 3π Survey, a multi-filter, multi-epoch survey of three-fourths of the sky (∼30,000 deg2). The Pan-STARRS 1 photometric system is defined in Tonry et al. (2012) and consists of five filters used for the 3π Survey (gP1, rP1, iP1, zP1, and yP1) as well as an extra-wide wP1 filter specially designed for asteroid searches. It is the yP1 filter, centered on 0.99 microns (δλ = 70 nm), which makes Pan-STARRS 1 ideal for surveying the local population of brown dwarfs. So far over 100 T dwarfs have been identified (Deacon et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2011; M. C. Liu et al., in preparation), many in the early-T regime (Best et al. 2013). Such objects were often missed by previous surveys due to their indistinct colors in the near-infrared compared to background M dwarfs. However, the addition of Pan-STARRS 1 astrometry and far-red optical photometry disentangles them from the much larger number of M dwarfs with similar near-infrared colors.

As a wide-field multi-epoch survey, Pan-STARRS 1 also provides an ideal data set for identifying wide, common proper motion companions to nearby stars. This is a natural extension of our search for nearby field brown dwarfs and involves searching the Pan-STARRS 1 proper motion database for objects moving with a common proper motion to known stars. This approach has already led to the discovery of a wide T4.5 companion to the nearby K dwarf HIP 38939 (Deacon et al. 2012b). Additionally, objects discovered in our field brown dwarf search can be cross-matched with catalogs of nearby stars to serendipitously identify wide multiple systems. In Deacon et al. (2012a), we used this method to identify a wide T5 companion to the M dwarf LHS 2803 (simultaneously found by Mužić et al. 2012). We present here the results of our full search for wide cool and ultracool companions identified using PS1 proper motions.

2. IDENTIFICATION IN PAN-STARRS1 DATA

2.1. Primary Star Selection

To identify objects with proper motion in common with nearby stars, we first began by collating lists of stars to search in. We started with stars from the Hipparcos catalog (van Leeuwen 2007). To limit the contamination by distant background stars in our sample, we included only Hipparcos stars with proper motions above 0farcs1 yr−1 and parallaxes more significant than 5σ (d ≲ 200 pc). This provided us with a relatively complete sample of stars in the solar neighborhood with spectral types A–K. We supplemented this catalog with lower-mass primaries drawn from the LSPM (Lépine & Shara 2005; μ >0farcs15 yr−1, δ > 0°) and rNLTT (Salim & Gould 2003; μ > 0farcs2 yr−1) proper motion catalogs and with the bright M dwarf catalog of Lépine & Gaidos (2011) to which we applied a proper motion cut of μ > 0farcs1 yr−1. See Table 1 for details on the number of primary stars from each input catalog.

Table 1. Summary Information on the Sources for Our Input Primary List

Survey Reference ntotal npasseda  
Hipparcos van Leeuwen (2007) 117955 9466
Lepine & Gaidos Lépine & Gaidos (2011) 8889 5432
bright M dwarfs      
LSPM North Lépine & Shara (2005) 61977 60793
rNLTT Salim & Gould (2003) 36085 31696
Totalb     79593

Notes. aThe number of objects that passed our Galactic latitude, total proper motion, and declination cuts and (for Hipparcos stars) our parallax. bTotal number excluding duplicate appearances of the same object in different catalogs.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

2.2. Selection of Companions from Pan-STARRS 1 Data

Pan-STARRS 1 is an ongoing survey and as such the available data products are constantly evolving. We conducted our search over several iterations of the Pan-STARRS 1 3π database. In all our searches we queried the most up-to-date Pan-STARRS 1 3π database using the Desktop Virtual Observatory software (Magnier et al. 2008). Initially, our search involved combining 2MASS and Pan-STARRS 1 data to calculate proper motions in a similar process to that used by Deacon et al. (2011). For this PS1 + 2MASS search, we required that objects had more than one detection in the yP1 band. PS1 detections were required to have a significance greater than 5σ to be included in the astrometric and photometric solutions of their parent object. We also required that the objects be classified as good quality, point-source detections in both Pan-STARRS 1 and 2MASS.

Since 2012 June, we have used proper motions calculated using Pan-STARRS 1 only data (although 2MASS data is included if a detection is within 1'' of the mean Pan-STARRS 1 position). In these cases, we required that the proper motion measurement of the candidate companion was more significant than 5σ, be calculated from more than seven position measurements, and that the time baseline over which it was calculated be greater than 400 days. Note that the Pan-STARRS 1 survey strategy consists of pairs of observations in the same filter taken ∼25 minutes apart and often two filters will be taken in the same night. Hence our requirement of seven position measurements does not imply seven independent epochs evenly spread across the time baseline of the proper motion calculation.

In the case of the Hipparcos and Lépine & Gaidos (2011) catalogs, distance estimates were available for all our target stars. Hence we searched for companions out to projected separations of 10,000 AU. For the LSPM and rNLTT catalogs, where distance estimates are not available for all the stars, we used a maximum search radius of 20 arcmin. In all cases we made an initial cut on our candidates, requiring that candidates have proper motions that agree with their supposed primaries' proper motions to within 0farcs1 yr−1 in both R.A. and declination. This initial cut uses a tolerance that is much larger than our typical Pan-STARRS 1 proper motion errors of ∼5 mas yr−1. Next, we made much more stringent cuts on proper motion to select only likely companions.

We restricted our search to objects which had proper motion differences compared to their primaries that were less significant than 5σ; here σ is the quadrature sum of the proper motion difference in each axis divided by the total proper motion error in that axis.

Equation (1)

Our typical proper motion errors in Pan-STARRS 1 + 2MASS data are ∼5 mas yr−1. We selected two samples for follow-up observations. In all cases we set a zone of exclusion around the Galactic center |b| < 5° and l < 90 or l > 270.

  • 1.  
    Ultracool companions. Objects with red Pan-STARRS1 colors (zP1yP1 > 0.8 mag) or (yP1J2MASS > 1.8 mag) were selected as candidate ultracool companions. These cuts should only select objects of spectral types M7 or later (Deacon et al. 2011). These targets also had their Pan-STARRS 1 and 2MASS colors inspected to ensure they truly were red objects and had not entered our sample due to erroneous zP1 or yP1 photometry. This involved removing objects with more than one gP1 detection or with blue iP1yP1 colors.Note that two objects (the companions to LSPM J2153+1157 and NLTT 39312) are both close companions that did not meet our zP1yP1 color cut but were selected due to their red yP1J2MASS colors (>1.6) and close proximity (<12'') to their primaries. These were subsequently spectrally typed as ultracool dwarfs. These two objects may have had their photometry affected by the proximity of their primary.This sample yielded a total of 38 new discoveries, one of which (HIP 13589B) was simultaneously discovered by Allen et al. (2012). We have also re-identified and typed the NLTT 22073 system originally identified by Deacon & Hambly (2007) and HIP 78184 B originally proposed as a candidate companion by Pinfield et al. (2006).
  • 2.  
    Bright companions. We selected the brightest of our common proper motion candidates (J2MASS < 15.5 mag) for a poor-weather back-up program for our NASA IRTF SpeX observations regardless of their color. These objects were mostly within an arcminute of the primary, with all having separations smaller than 3'. This resulted in the discovery of 16 new, bright companions and the typing of 26 previously known companions.

2.3. Serendipitous Discoveries

As part of our ongoing search for T dwarfs in Pan-STARRS 1 data (see Deacon et al. 2011 and Liu et al. 2011 for more details), we have been obtaining follow-up near-infrared photometry of Pan-STARRS 1 selected candidates. UKIDSS (Lawrence et al. 2007) or VISTA (Emerson & Sutherland 2010) data were used where available; otherwise our candidate T dwarfs were observed using WFCAM (Casali et al. 2007) on the United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (UKIRT). We then cross-matched all our observed candidates with our combined proper motion catalog from Lépine & Shara (2005), Salim & Gould (2003), and Lépine & Gaidos (2011) with a pairing radius of 20'. Objects that had yP1J2MASS > 2.2 mag were initially selected to be T dwarf candidates. However, if the additional near-IR photometry did not match our yP1JMKO > 2.4 mag and JMKOHMKO < 0.7 mag high priority T dwarf cut, but still met our yP1JMKO > 2.0 mag criterion, those objects were considered to be candidate L dwarfs. Any of these ∼500 candidates that then had proper motions which did not deviate by more than 5σ from their supposed primary stars were selected as candidate L companions for this search.

One of the serendipitous candidates we selected was a possible companion to the late-type high proper motion star NLTT 730. After searching the SIMBAD database, we identified our candidate object as 2MASS J00150206+2959323, a blue L7.5 dwarf found by Kirkpatrick et al. (2010) as a field object. As a blue L benchmark, this is similar to the G 203–50AB system identified by Radigan et al. (2008) although it is substantially wider (5070 AU versus 135 AU). This object is included in our subsequent analysis. In total we selected five serendipitous candidate companions.

Our proper motion companions are reported in Tables 2 and 3. A comparison between their proper motions and photometric distances (see Section 4.1.1) and the proper motions and distances of their primaries are shown in Table 4 for the Hipparcos companions and Table 5 for the companions to M dwarfs. In all our tables, the proper motions from the secondaries come from Pan-STARRS 1 + 2MASS proper motions. Where the object's 2MASS position was not included in the initial astrometric analysis we recalculated the proper motion solution including the 2MASS data. The proper motions and distances for all of our Hipparcos primaries come from van Leeuwen (2007).

3. FOLLOW-UP OBSERVATIONS AND ARCHIVAL DATA

3.1. Infrared Photometry

Where companions have confused or noisy photometry, we have used UKIRT/WFCAM (Casali et al. 2007) to acquire additional near-infrared photometry. These data were reduced at the Cambridge Astronomical Survey Unit using the WFCAM survey pipeline (Irwin et al. 2004; Hodgkin et al. 2009). See Table 6 for the near-infrared photometry of our companions from our UKIRT observations, 2MASS (Skrutskie et al. 2006), UKIDSS (Lawrence et al. 2007), VISTA; (Emerson & Sutherland 2010), pre-release photometry from the UKIRT Hemisphere Survey (UHS; S. Dye et al., in preparation, accessed through the WFCAM Science Archive; Hambly et al. 2008) and Table 7 for mid-infrared photometry from WISE (Wright et al. 2010; Cutri et al. 2012).

3.2. Near-infrared Spectroscopy

To characterize our companions, we obtained 0.8–2.5 μm spectroscopy using the SpeX instrument (Rayner et al. 2003) on the NASA Infrared Telescope (IRTF). To minimize the possibility of observing an unrelated background object due to a non-physical chance alignment with one of our primaries, we preferentially followed-up (i.e., we were more likely to follow-up) companions closer than five arcminutes but did not follow-up all of our candidate companions. In total 115 candidate companions to stars were passed to the IRTF queue, 87 are presented here as true companions, 1 we classify as an unlikely companion, 2 are candidate white dwarf companions not presented in this work, and the remaining 26 were not observed.

Depending on the brightness of the object and the weather conditions, we used either the low-resolution (R ≈ 75–120) single-order prism mode or the moderate-resolution (R ≈ 750–2000) multiple-order cross-dispersed SXD mode. The slit width was chosen to match the seeing and was oriented along the parallactic angle to minimize atmospheric dispersion. The observations were taken in nodded ABBA patterns. The standards were taken contemporaneously with each science target and at similar airmass and sky position. We reduced all our spectra using version 3.4 of the SpeXtool software package (Cushing et al. 2004; Vacca et al. 2003). See Table 8 for details of the exposure times, weather conditions, and standard stars used for each object.

We spectrally classified our objects by visually comparing with the M and L near-infrared standards from Kirkpatrick et al. (2010). Additionally, for our L dwarf companions we measured three flux indices (H2O-J, H2O-H, and CH4-K) from Burgasser et al. (2006) relevant for L dwarfs. We then applied the polynomial relations of Burgasser (2007) to derive spectral types, averaging over the types derived from each index. We note that the CH4-K index does not depend strongly on spectral type earlier than mid-L and hence excluded this from the averaging for objects with this visual classification (see Table 9). Figures 1 and 2 show our early to mid-M dwarf companions to Hipparcos stars, Figure 3 shows our late-M and L dwarf Hipparcos companions, and Figure 4 shows our companions around non-Hipparcos primaries and serendipitous discoveries. Additionally, we observed a number of our primary stars that lacked spectral types in the literature. The spectra for these objects are shown in Figure 5.

For objects with spectral types earlier than M, there are no near-infrared standards so we compared with the spectral library of Cushing et al. (2005) and Rayner et al. (2009), selecting the best comparison spectrum visually. For any of our objects with spectral types earlier than M5, we specifically examined the ∼0.85 μm TiO feature in the Z-band and the Y-band 1 μm FeH feature. For two primaries classified as G dwarfs we also examined the strengths of metal and hydrogen lines. We identified one of our companions (HIP 88728 B) as having blue continua and weak Paschen lines. Hence we classify this object as a DA white dwarf (see Figure 6).

3.3. Optical Spectroscopy

As a number of our primaries were poorly characterized, we obtained optical spectroscopy from both the Kitt Peak Mayall 4 m telescope and the University of Hawaii 2.2 m telescope.

3.3.1. Kitt Peak Mayall 4 m Spectroscopy

On 2013 December 31 UT we obtained optical spectra of NLTT 38389 and NLTT 1011 with the Ritchey–Chretien Spectrograph equipped with the T2KA CCD on the Kitt Peak National Observatory 4 m Mayall telescope. The BL 420 grating was blazed at 7800 Å (first order) with the GG495 order blocking filter. The slit was set at 1farcs5 by 98'', resulting in spectra spanning 6300–8500 Å at a resolving power of ∼3 Å. NLTT 38389 and NLTT 1011 were targeted at airmasses of 1.25 and 1.01 with exposures of 600 s and 240 s, respectively. We also acquired optical spectroscopy for one of our companions (HIP 84840 B) on 2014 May 22 UT with the same set-up at airmass 1.03.. The slit was oriented in the N–S direction for all observations, so slit losses from chromatic dispersion may be non-negligible for NLTT 38389. The spectrophotometric standards HR 3454 (Hamuy et al. 1992) (2013 December 31 UT) and HZ 44 (2014 May 22 UT) were observed at airmasses of 1.15 and 1.0, respectively, for flux calibration. Each 2D image was corrected for bad pixels and cosmic rays, bias subtracted, and flat fielded. After sky subtraction, each spectrum was corrected for throughput losses using our standard star measurements.

3.3.2. University of Hawaii 2.2 m Telescope/SNIFS Spectroscopy

To aid in characterizing the primary stars, we took spectra of GD 280, NLTT 730, LSPM J2153+1157, and NLTT 22073 with the SuperNova Integral Field Spectrograph (Aldering et al. 2002; Lantz 2004) on the University of Hawaii 2.2 m telescope on Mauna Kea on UT 2013 October 19 and December 13–14. SNIFS provides simultaneous coverage from 3200 Å to 9700 Å at a resolution of R ∼ 1000. Integration times varied from 65 to 500 s, depending on the R magnitude. This was sufficient to get reasonable S/N (>70 at 6000 Å) on all targets except GD 280, which had particularly low S/N (∼15) due to patchy cloud cover and a fainter magnitude. The SNIFS pipeline (Bacon et al. 2001) performed basic reduction, including dark, bias, and flat-field corrections, wavelength calibration, sky subtraction, and extraction of the 1D spectrum. We took spectra of the spectrophotometric standards EG 131, Fiege 110, GD 71, Feige 66, and HR 7596 during the night, which were then used to flux calibrate the data and remove telluric lines. Additional information on SNIFS data processing can be found in Lépine et al. (2013) and Mann et al. (2013b).

4. NEW COMMON PROPER MOTION COMPANIONS

In total we have spectrally typed 87 companions to nearby stars of which 56 are new discoveries. Of these, 24 of our new discoveries are L dwarf companions, 1 is a late K, 2 are DA white dwarfs, 23 M7–M9.5 dwarfs, with the remaining 39 being M0–M6.5 dwarfs. Finder charts for our new companions are shown in Figure 7. In addition, we identified one previously known blue L dwarf (2MASS J00150206+2959323, Kirkpatrick et al. 2010) as a companion to an M dwarf (NLTT 730), and a candidate L dwarf companion to an M dwarf (NLTT 35593), which we consider an unlikely companion to its M dwarf primary.

4.1. Companionship Checks

In order to assess whether our candidate companions are merely alignments of unassociated stars, we undertook a test similar to Lépine & Bongiorno (2007). This consisted of taking all the objects in our input lists (Hipparcos, LSPM/rNLTT, and Lépine & Gaidos 2011) and offsetting their positions by two degrees in right ascension. We then searched for common proper motion companions to this list of modified positions. This test should only yield non-physical (coincident) pairings. To accurately reflect the probability of our objects being coincident contaminants, we applied the same cuts that were applied to our initial target sample. As an additional cut to exclude spuriously red objects (which we have excluded from our candidate sample by checking the objects' gP1, rP1, and iP1 magnitudes) we excluded objects with more than one gP1 detection.

In Figure 8, we compare the separation and proper motion differences for our HIP samples and the coincident population. All objects in both our bright and ultracool companion samples that were followed up spectroscopically lie in portions of the plot sparsely populated by coincident pairings. This is likely due to our approach of preferentially following-up closer companions. Figure 9 shows the results for companions to non-Hipparcos primaries and our serendipitous discoveries. Most of our discoveries lie in a completely different area of the plot from the coincident pairings. However, one object, the apparent companion to NLTT 35593, is in a region of the diagram populated by many coincident pairings, and therefore we do not consider it to be a bona-fide companion. Excluding this object, we consider it likely that less than five of our companions to Hipparcos stars will be chance alignments with background stars. For our faint non-Hipparcos primaries, at most, two could be chance alignments. All of these coincident pairs would lie in the lowest proper motion bin of our sample.

4.1.1. Photometric Distance

To further check the companionship of the objects, we derived photometric distances for all of our companions based on their spectral type. For objects of spectral types M6 and later, we derived the absolute magnitudes for our objects using the relations of Dupuy & Liu (2012) in J, H, and K/KS. For earlier-type objects, we used the spectral energy distribution (SED) templates of Kraus & Hillenbrand (2007), who do not quote an rms for their relations. To estimate this we calculated the standard deviation of non-saturated 2MASS photometry of the FGK stars in Valenti & Fischer (2005) about the main sequence. These were found to be 0.25, 0.22, and 0.22 mag in J, H and Ks, respectively. Cruz & Reid (2002) calculated fits to the J-band absolute magnitude as a function of temperature-sensitive spectral features for M dwarfs. They found that the M dwarf population was well-fitted by two relations, one covering early M with an rms of ∼0.2 mag and the other covering late M with an rms of ∼0.35 mag. This latter number is comparable with the 0.39 mag rms on the 2MASS J-band relation of Dupuy & Liu (2012). Hence we use the rms of Dupuy & Liu (2012) for objects of spectral type M5 and later and our calculated rms for earlier-type objects.

Next, we calculated absolutes magnitude from the Kraus & Hillenbrand (2007) or Dupuy & Liu (2012) relations and compared these with the object's 2MASS photometry, or if available VISTA, UKIDSS, or UKIRT photometry, producing a distance estimate for each filter. Where non-2MASS near-infrared photometry was available for an object in a particular filter, we used this instead of 2MASS, making use of the Dupuy & Liu (2012) MKO relations for ultracool dwarfs and converting to the 2MASS system using the transformations of Carpenter (2001) for comparisons to the Kraus & Hillenbrand (2007) SEDs. We calculated the errors in distance caused by an uncertainty in spectral type, by the rms of the fits, and by the error on the 2MASS photometry. We then calculated the weighted mean of these distance estimates, weighting only by our measurement errors, i.e., the quadrature sum of the error in the photometric measurements and the propagated error in spectral typing. We then calculated a final error on this distance based on the quadrature sum of the photometric error, intrinsic scatter, and propagated error in spectral type for each band. Hence the final quoted error includes both the effects of measurement errors and the rms intrinsic scatter about the photometric relations. The calculated photometric distances are shown in Tables 4 and 5. Note that our white dwarf companion (HIP 88728 B), which was saturated in Pan-STARRS 1, is not resolved in plate images.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. IRTF/SpeX spectra for our Hipparcos companions with spectral types from M0.5 to M4. Spectra taken with SpeX SXD mode have been Gaussian smoothed to R = 200. For the SXD spectra note that the noisy gaps at 1.4 μm and 1.8 μm are caused by the order boundaries.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 2.

Figure 2. IRTF/SpeX spectra for our Hipparcos companions with spectral types from M5 to M6.5. Spectra taken with SpeX SXD mode have been Gaussian smoothed to R = 200.

Standard image High-resolution image

We also calculated photometric distances for our primaries that lacked trigonometric parallaxes. For primaries with measured spectral types, we applied a similar process as for our secondaries. Where there were no literature spectral distances we used relations from Lépine (2005) and the errors in those distances were calculated in the same way as for the secondaries. For our two white dwarf primaries we used the photometric distance relations of Limoges et al. (2013). For this we assumed a DA spectral type and a mass of 0.6 M. Limoges et al. (2013) quote a photometric distance error of 15 pc for their sample with approximate distances of 30 pc. Hence we assume errors of 50% for our white dwarf photometric distances. It appears that most of our companions have photometric distances that are in good agreement with the distances to their primaries. This is shown in Figure 10.

4.2. Spectral Types and Ages of the Primaries

4.2.1. Spectral Types

We searched the literature for information on our primary stars. While many had spectral types either from previous measurements, 32 were unclassified. For primaries with no published spectral type we have obtained where possible near-infrared or optical spectroscopic observations (see Sections 3.2 and 3.3). These objects are shown in Figures 5 and 11. For objects with no spectral type from the literature or that were not observed as part of our follow-up program, we used the V − J to spectral type relation of Lépine & Gaidos (2011). For our non-Hipparcos primaries, we use the MV magnitudes listed in Lépine & Shara (2005) and Salim & Gould (2003) along with J magnitudes from 2MASS. For the single object that was too blue for this relation to be valid (HIP 111657), we used the primary's 2MASS photometry and the SED of Kraus & Hillenbrand (2007) to estimate spectral type. Tables 10 and 11 show details of our primary stars.

For objects observed with SNIFS, spectral types for NLTT 730, LSPM J2153+1157, and NLTT 22073 were determined following the methods outlined in Lépine et al. (2013). Specifically, we measured the strengths of the TiO and CaH features and then compared to stars from Reid et al. (1995). We also matched each spectrum by eye to templates from Bochanski et al. (2007) using the IDL spectral typing suite of Covey et al. (2007). Metallicities were determined following the methods of Mann et al. (2013a), which provide empirical relations between visible-wavelength features and metallicities for late-K to mid-M dwarfs. Errors in metallicities were calculated considering both errors in the Mann et al. (2013a) calibration and measurement errors. We classified NLTT 1011 using our Mayall Telescope data and the Covey et al. (2007) HAMMER indices, resulting in a type of K5. Our other Kitt Peak targets, NLTT 38489 and HIP 84840 B, were visually compared to the spectral templates of Bochanski et al. (2007) with best matches of M3 and M4, respectively; these subtypes were confirmed by index measurements using the method of Lépine et al. (2013) for NLTT 38489, while HIP 84840 B was classified as an M3.5. We adopt our visual comparisons along with a spectral typing error of half a subclass for these two objects. None of our observed objects showed emission in Hα. One of our SNIFS targets, GD 280, was listed as a candidate white dwarf by Giclas et al. (1967). Our spectrum shows clear Balmer line absorption; hence we classify it as a DA white dwarf. We do not have a spectrum for LSPM J0241+2553. The resulting spectral types and metallicities for the objects observed with SNIFS are listed in Table 11 and the spectra are shown in Figure 11.

4.2.2. Age Estimates

Twenty-three of our primary stars have age estimates listed in the literature. For remaining objects with no published ages, we used archival Ca H and K emission and where this was found, applied the age–activity relation of Mamajek & Hillenbrand (2008). The majority of our primaries had no such data, and the only object that did had no age derived from such emission in the literature. For the remaining 54 objects with no Ca H and K measurements, we set an approximate upper age limit of ∼10 Gyr based on their disk-like kinematics.

To set a lower limit for the handful of M-dwarf primaries where we had an optical spectrum, we used the object's lack of Hα and the activity lifetime of West et al. (2008). Here we used the 1σ lower limit for the activity age, taking into account that our spectral types have an uncertainty of 0.5 spectral types. For all our objects without Hα or Ca H and K data, we searched the ROSAT Faint Source catalog (Voges et al. 2000) with a matching radius of 30''. We identified four objects as having weak X-ray emission; the rest we assumed that the flux was below the limiting flux quoted by Schmitt et al. (1995). We then used the distances to these objects along with the counts to flux conversion of Schmitt et al. (1995) to estimate the X-ray luminosity. We converted this to the X-ray to bolometric luminosity ratio (Rx) using an Lbol calculated from Tycho photometry (Hog et al. 2000), the color relations of Mamajek et al. (2002), and the bolometric corrections of Pecaut & Mamajek (2013). This was then applied to the age-to-X-ray activity relation of Mamajek & Hillenbrand (2008) to obtain lower age limits. Note that this X-ray relation has not been calibrated beyond mid-K spectral types, hence we used the objects' lack of X-ray emission to set a lower age limit of 300 Myr for objects of this spectral type. This is the age below which low mass stars show significant X-ray emission (Shkolnik et al. 2009).

5. DISCUSSION

5.1. Comparison with the Field Ultracool Wide Binary Population

Our sample contains 24 new L-dwarf companions to main sequence stars (including the previously typed but unrecognized L7 companion to NLTT 730 but not the unlikely L2 companion to NLTT 35593). Additionally we identified 21 new wide M-dwarf companions with spectral types of M7 or later and typed two previously proposed companions.

In order to study the wide ultracool (spectral type ⩾M7) binary population, we compiled a list of wide ultracool companions to stars (see Table 12). We began with the compilation of Faherty et al. (2010; excluding the companion to NLTT 20346 that Dupuy & Liu 2012 concluded was not physically related due to its high proper motion difference from its primary) and added spectroscopically confirmed objects from the literature discovered since then. We do not include objects that have been identified as candidate binaries but that lack spectral types such as from the studies of Deacon et al. (2009), Dhital et al. (2010), and Smith et al. (2014). Figure 12 shows the spectral type of the secondary plotted against the projected separation (rAU). At first glance, there is an apparent scarcity of T dwarf companions wider than 3000 AU. In fact, this is due to previous efforts focusing on identifying close companions and from the known population being drawn from a series of heterogeneous surveys. Figure 13 shows a histogram comparing the combined contribution of this work, Deacon et al. (2012b) and Deacon et al. (2012a) to the total number of companions. This paper's contribution is most significant beyond log10rAU = 3.5 where we have doubled the population of L dwarf companions. In total we have increased the wide (>300 AU) L dwarf companion population by 82% and doubled the number of ultracool M dwarf companions in the same range. While the L dwarf population exhibits an approximately flat distribution in log10rAU, the T dwarf companion population peaks between log10rAU = 3.0 and 3.5. However, any claim of a preferred separation for T dwarf companions (or of a log-flat distribution for L dwarfs) should be treated with caution as the sample is drawn from a disparate set of surveys. Similarly the apparent cut-off above 10,000 AU is likely due to incompleteness in surveys (including our own) and the difficulty of disentangling the widest binaries from coincident alignments from field stars. In a future paper we aim to take the final results of our survey, model our selection biases, and determine the true separation distribution of the ultracool companion population.

In order to determine the stability of the population of systems containing a wide, ultracool companion, we estimated the total mass of each system. Where an object had a mass quoted in the literature, we used that value. For known L and T dwarfs with no quoted mass estimates and our new L and T companions, we used a value of 0.075 M, in essence making our total mass estimates for these systems upper limits. For A–M stars with no mass in the literature, we converted their spectral type to mass using the relations of Kraus & Hillenbrand (2007).15 The results are plotted in Figure 14 along with the maximum separation versus total mass relations suggested by Close et al. (2003) and Reid et al. (2001). It is clear that a substantial number of late-type companions lie outside both of these suggested maximum boundaries and are hence loosely bound. Dhital et al. (2010) used a simple model of interactions in the Galactic disk (based on Weinberg et al. 1987) to calculate the typical maximum separation for a given system age and total mass. This is also plotted in Figure 14 for a number of different ages. It is clear that, though loosely bound, very few of the widest systems would be disrupted over the lifetime of the Galactic disk.

5.2. Interesting Individual Systems

5.2.1. HIP 6407Bab

We initially classified HIP 6407B as an L0 based on visual comparison to standards. However, the object has significantly stronger water absorption features suggestive of an object two or three subtypes later. As this may result from the contribution of an unresolved additional component, we observed this object on 2013 October 14 UT at the Keck II telescope using the facility near-infrared camera NIRC2 with laser guide star adaptive optics (LGS AO; Wizinowich et al. 2006; van Dam et al. 2006). We kept the LGS centered in NIRC2's narrow field-of-view camera while we obtained dithered images of the target in the YNIRC2, JMKO, HMKO, and CH4s bandpassess. The wavefront sensor recorded flux from the LGS equivalent to a V ≈ 9.6–9.8 mag star. The primary star HIP 6407 was used as the tip-tilt reference star, and the lower bandwidth sensor monitoring this source recorded flux equivalent to a R ≈ 7.6 mag star. Our procedure for reducing and analyzing Keck LGS data is described in detail in our previous work (e.g., Liu et al. 2006; Dupuy et al. 2010). To summarize briefly, we measure binary parameters by fitting three-component Gaussians to determine the position and flux of each binary component, and we derive uncertainties by computing the scatter among individual dithered images. We used the NIRC2 astrometric calibration from Yelda et al. (2010), which includes a correction for the nonlinear distortion of the camera and has a pixel scale of 9.952 ± 0.002 mas per pixel and an orientation for the detector's +y axis of +0fdg252 ± 0fdg009 east of north. We resolved HIP 6407B as a 0farcs131 (7.4 AU) binary. Table 13 gives the binary parameters we measured in each bandpass along with the weighted average of the separation (ρ) and position angle (P.A.) values. Given the objects' separation and maximum total mass of 0.16 M (as it consists of two substellar objects), the likely period of this system is >300 yr, making it a poor mass–age benchmark.

Table 2. Summary Information on Our Wide Companions

Object WDS Position SpT SpT yP1 J2MASS dprimary Separation Separation Metallicityk Age
Designation (Eq. = J2000 Ep. = 2010.0) Primary Secondary (mag) (mag) (pc) ('') (AU) (dex) (Gyr)
HIP search companions          
HIP 2397 B ... 00 30 24.94 +22 44 47.1 K5 L0.5 16.606 ± 0.008 14.586 ± 0.038 [33.9$_{-1.3}^{+1.4}$] 117.1 3970 ... 0.5–∼10y
HIP 6217 C ... 01 19 44.74 +00 06 18.5 K0 M9.5 16.859 ± 0.009 15.441 ± 0.060 [$70.9_{-11.7}^{+14.0}$] 27.4 2767 ... 0.4–∼10y1
HIP 6407 B ... 01 22 16.99 +03 31 22.0 G5 L1+T3l 17.527 ± 0.027 15.471 ± 0.046 [57.2$_{-3.0}^{+3.3}$] 44.9 2570 ... 0.5–∼10y
HIP 9269 B‡ ... 01 59 10.98 +33 12 27.8 G5 L6 18.266 ± 0.031 15.956 ± 0.088 [25.0$_{-0.4}^{+0.3}$] 52.1 1300 0.15 2.2–10.2i
HIP 10033 B ... 02 09 10.58 −02 19 19.0 F8 M5 15.14 ± 0.003 13.761 ± 0.027 [69.7$_{-3.1}^{+3.4}$] 42.9 2990 −0.08 2.7–3.7j
HIP 11161 B ... 02 23 36.59 +52 40 05.9 F5 L1.5 18.785 ± 0.067 16.636 ± 0.161 [69.3$_{-3.6}^{+4.1}$] 47.7 3300 −0.23 0.5–2.4j
HIP 13589 B* ... 02 55 07.10 +21 36 21.1 G0 M7.5 17.098 ± 0.009 14.928 ± 0.034 [72.8$_{-4.0}^{+4.6}$] 49.2 3580 ... 0.4–∼10y
HIP 26653 B ... 05 39 49.51 +52 53 58.3 G5 L5 16.905 ± 0.012 14.756 ± 0.044 [$18.8_{-3.1}^{+3.7}$] 27.0 753 −0.07 1.1–9.3i
                    −0.1 1.6–13.8j
HIP 32728 B ... 06 49 30.59 +36 26 26.0 G0 M6.5 16.060 ± 0.006 14.508 ± 0.031 [46.6$_{-2.6}^{+2.9}$] 94.3 4400 ... 0.3–∼10y
HIP 37283 B† 07394+5032 B 07 39 32.03 +50 31 07.3 F5 M6 14.214 ± 0.002 12.797 ± 0.027 [45.5$_{-1.2}^{+1.2}$] 106.1 4830 −0.1 0.4–2.1j
HIP 46984 B ... 09 34 33.18 +03 34 07.0 F8 M4 14.521 ± 0.002 13.285 ± 0.027 [74.7$_{-6.9}^{+8.6}$] 37.5 2800 ... 0.4–∼10y
HIP 49046 B† 10004+2716 B 10 00 35.71 +27 17 06.7 M0 M6.5 14.482 ± 0.002 13.022 ± 0.022 [34.7$_{-2.3}^{+2.6}$] 136.1 4720 ... 0.3–∼10z
HIP 51877 B ... 10 35 54.72 +36 55 41.0 G5 M9.5 16.935 ± 0.008 15.205 ± 0.063 [$57.4_{-9.6}^{+11.5}$] 17.6 954 0.22u 2.4–7.5i
HIP 52463 B† 10435–1852 B 10 43 26.65 −18 52 18.2 G4 M5 15.043 ± 0.003 13.703 ± 0.024 [74.2$_{-4.5}^{+5.2}$] 43.5 3230 0.14 1.0–4.9j
HIP 55666 B‡ ... 11 24 23.43 −05 54 09.8 F5 M5.5 14.533 ± 0.037 12.674 ± 0.024 [49.8$_{-1.5}^{+1.5}$] 37.2 1850 0.14 3.6–5.1j
HIP 58918 B† 12049+3437 B 12 04 52.15 +34 37 23.2 K1 M7 15.849 ± 0.004 14.471 ± 0.03 [55.8$_{-5.1}^{+6.2}$] 20.0 1110 ... 0.1–∼10y
HIP 59310 B† 12101+1859 B 12 10 09.79 +18 58 07.9 K5 M7 15.252 ± 0.002 13.691 ± 0.027 [44.4$_{-2.8}^{+3.2}$] 82.1 3650 ... 0.2–∼10y
HIP 59933 B ... 12 17 36.41 +14 27 11.7 F8 L1 18.111 ± 0.032 16.101 ± 0.088 [57.0$_{-2.4}^{+2.7}$] 38.1 2170 0.03 0.3–2.5j
HIP 60501 B† 12241+0357 B 12 24 09.68 +03 56 03.3 M0 M5 12.876 ± 0.022 11.378 ± 0.027 [56.6$_{-6.0}^{+7.6}$] 37.1 2100 ... 0.3–∼10z
HIP 60987 B†c 12300–0601 B 12 30 01.60 −06 01 23.7 F2 K7 ... ... [61.9$_{-2.3}^{+2.4}$] ∼5 ∼300 −0.12 1.3–2.4j
HIP 60987 C† 12300–0601 C 12 30 00.68 −06 01 17.9 F2 M3 12.553 ± 0.001 11.402 ± 0.028 [61.9$_{-2.3}^{+2.4}$] 19.0 1170 −0.12 2.0j
HIP 63506 Cf 13008+4213 C 13 00 50.27 +42 14 47.6 M0 L1 16.999 ± 0.008 15.15 ± 0.042 [42.5$_{-3.9}^{+4.7}$] 132.8 5640 ... 0.3–∼10z
HIP 65706 B† 13284+3005 B 13 28 20.77 +30 03 17.0 K7 M7 15.016 ± 0.003 13.315 ± 0.022 [51.1$_{-4.0}^{+4.8}$] 52.6 2690 ... 0.3–∼10z
HIP 65780 Cf 13291+1128 C 13 29 06.09 +11 27 52.2 K0 M5 14.327 ± 0.001 13.580 ± 0.002h [58.0$_{-3.3}^{+3.7}$] 16.0 928 ... 0.5–∼10y
HIP 70623 B† 14268–0511 B 14 26 45.74 −05 10 20.9 K0 M5.5 13.619 ± 0.003 12.191 ± 0.026 [72.6$_{-4.7}^{+5.5}$] 41.9 3040 0.46 3.3–6.0i
HIP 75310 B ... 15 23 10.01 −10 28 58.4 G5 M5 14.668 ± 0.003 13.291 ± 0.032 [66.9$_{-5.1}^{+6.0}$] 22.9 1530 −0.22 6.3–9.3j
HIP 76456 B ... 15 36 56.27 +29 59 31.1 F5 M6.5 14.753 ± 0.002 13.300 ± 0.031 [36.8$_{-0.6}^{+0.6}$] 36.1 1330 −0.25 0.4–2.2j
HIP 76641 B ... 15 38 59.53 +43 52 17.2 G5 M3.5 12.158 ± 0.001 10.817 ± 0.018 [82.1$_{-4.7}^{+5.3}$] 42.1 3460 ... 0.4–∼10y
HIP 78184 Bm 15578+5916 B 15 57 55.32 +59 14 25.3 M0 M9 16.219 ± 0.024 14.32 ± 0.031 [31.4$_{-1.3}^{+1.4}$] 121.8 3820 ... 0.3–∼10z
HIP 78859 B† 16059+3500 B 16 05 49.62 +34 59 53.9 G0 M5 13.57 ± 0.009 12.258 ± 0.021 [57.2$_{-2.1}^{+2.3}$] 42.6 2440 ... 0.7–∼10y
HIP 78916 B ... 16 06 32.22 +22 53 34.5 G0 M8 16.694 ± 0.008 15.227 ± 0.043 [92.9$_{-9.2}^{+11.5}$] 35.5 3294 ... 0.4–∼10y
HIP 78923 B ... 16 06 38.65 +34 06 19.3 G5 M8 15.565 ± 0.004 14.052 ± 0.048 [46.1$_{-1.7}^{+1.8}$] 15.5 714 −0.1j 0.4–4.0j
HIP 79180 B† 16097+6550 B 16 09 42.06 +65 49 18.1 K7 M5 15.315 ± 0.003 13.941 ± 0.022 [74.7$_{-3.4}^{+3.7}$] 29.0 2170 ... 0.3–∼10z
HIP 80258 B† 16231+3650 B 16 23 09.09 +36 50 50.2 K3 M4 14.487 ± 0.004 13.113 ± 0.021 [63.7$_{-7.5}^{+9.6}$] 54.9 3500 ... 0.1–∼10y
HIP 81910 B ... 16 43 49.50 −26 48 40.2 G2 M6 13.852 ± 0.025 12.44 ± 0.024 [46.4$_{-0.8}^{+0.9}$] 26.7 1240 0.19 4.0–5.8j
HIP 82233 B ... 16 48 03.98 −15 57 56.7 G2 M5.5 13.198 ± 0.009 11.889 ± 0.024 [42.1$_{-1.2}^{+1.3}$] 30.4 1280 −0.05 0.7–4.7j
HIP 83651 B† 17058+0458 B 17 05 49.00 +04 57 24.8 K5 M3 12.529 ± 0.052 10.599 ± 0.024 [50.9$_{-4.2}^{+4.9}$] 28.9 1470 ... 0.1–∼10y
HIP 84840 B2 ... 17 20 22.02 +20 17 01.1 G1.5 M4 13.852 ± 0.007 12.508 ± 0.024 [$112_{-15}^{+19}$] 16.9 1890 ... 0.1–∼10y
HIP 85365 B ... 17 26 22.29 −05 02 11.2 F3 L5.5 18.55 ± 0.045 16.693 ± 0.168 [30.1$_{-0.2}^{+0.2}$] 294.1 8850 −0.09 1.6–1.9j
HIP 86722 B†b 17433+2137 B 17 43 15.32 +21 36 04.2 K0 M5.5 12.971 ± 0.018 11.511 ± 0.025 [22.7$_{-0.5}^{+0.4}$] 22.8 520 −0.33 3.0–11.8j
HIP 88728 B ... 18 06 50.92 +08 52 24.0 F5 DA 12.571 ± 0.019 10.269 ± 0.097 [$40.4_{-1.1}^{+1.2}$] 9.6 316 −0.1o 1.5–∼10y
HIP 90273 B† 18251+3016 B 18 25 11.57 +30 16 43.2 K7 M3.5 12.891 ± 0.054 11.56 ± 0.022 [55.4$_{-7.3}^{+10.0}$] 26.9 1490 ... 0.3–∼10z
HIP 90869 B ... 18 32 11.05 −26 29 45.1 G2 M2 12.428 ± 0.042 11.101 ± 0.029 [56.4$_{-3.0}^{+3.4}$] 17.5 990 −0.46 5.3–10.8j
                    1.9–5.7k  
HIP 93967 B ... 19 07 56.43 −15 14 16.3 F9 M3.5 14.529 ± 0.007 13.357 ± 0.03 [122.1$_{-19.6}^{+29.0}$] 22.2 2710 ... 0.2–∼10y
HIP 97168 B† 19450+5136 B 19 44 59.38 +51 35 31.3 G4 M5.5 14.997 ± 0.004 13.679 ± 0.027 [97.5$_{-10.4}^{+13.1}$] 12.6 1230 ... 0.1–∼10y
HIP 98535 C‡f 20011+4816 E 20 01 02.17 +48 16 27.8 F5 M5.5 14.763 ± 0.065 13.252 ± 0.031 [60.0$_{-3.3}^{+3.8}$] 61.7 3700 −0.02 0.6–13.2j
HIP 102582 B† 20473+1052 B 20 47 16.75 +10 51 45.1 K2 M5 13.256 ± 0.001 11.963 ± 0.033 [31.3$_{-1.3}^{+1.4}$] 14.7 459 ... 0.2–∼10y
HIP 103199 B† 20547+3046 B 20 54 33.60 +30 45 40.6 G5 M3.5 13.161 ± 0.01 11.817 ± 0.027 [59.5$_{-4.3}^{+5.1}$] 10.9 650 ... 0.2–∼10y
HIP 105202 B† 21187+0857 B 21 18 42.31 +08 56 45.0 F5 M4 13.456 ± 0.019 12.124 ± 0.024 [41.8$_{-1.3}^{+1.4}$] 89.4 3740 −0.29 0.6–2.9j
HIP 106551 B ... 21 34 45.17 +38 31 00.1 K3III M5 14.597 ± 0.01 13.224 ± 0.025 [71.0$_{-2.1}^{+2.2}$] 66.1 4690 ... ⩽10aa
HIP 108822 B† 22028+1207 B 22 02 48.15 +12 07 05.0 K7 M3 12.079 ± 0.002 10.622 ± 0.022 [44.4$_{-6.1}^{+8.5}$] 31.8 1410 ... 0.3–∼10z
HIP 109454 B ... 22 10 27.58 +30 48 28.1 F5 M3 13.729 ± 0.116 12.422 ± 0.026 [100.9$_{-5.8}^{+6.5}$] 18.2 1840 −0.19 1.4–2.1j
HIP 111657 B† 22371+1159 B 22 37 08.65 +11 58 53.0 K7 M4 11.978 ± 0.041 10.587 ± 0.032 [41.9$_{-3.0}^{+3.3}$] 7.8 330 ... 0.3–∼10z
HIP 112422 B‡b 22463+3319 C 22 46 18.57 +33 19 30.5 K2 L1.5 17.776 ± 0.021 16.023 ± 0.113 [65.4$_{-6.6}^{+8.3}$] 16.0 1040 ... 0.1–∼10*y
HIP 114424 B ... 23 10 22.08 −07 48 54.7 G0 M5.5 13.089 ± 0.001 11.595 ± 0.026 [35.1$_{-0.9}^{+1.1}$] 42.0 1480 0.08 0.6–4.5j
                    0.06 3.7–11.7i
HIP 114456 B†‡a 23108+4531 C 23 10 54.78 +45 30 43.8 K0 M5 12.371 ± 0.003 10.844 ± 0.021 [24.3$_{-0.3}^{+0.3}$] 50.4 1220 0.19 2.1–9.6k
HIP 115819 B ... 23 27 49.76 +04 51 00.1 K5 M8 16.865 ± 0.022 15.095 ± 0.034 [65.7$_{-8.2}^{+11.0}$] 30.4 2000 ... 0.2–∼10y
HIP 116052 B† 23309+2747 B 23 30 52.38 +27 46 32.3 G5 M3.5 13.718 ± 0.002 12.361 ± 0.019 [49.6$_{-2.3}^{+2.5}$][] 26.8 1330 ... 0.3–∼10y
Companions to faint non-HIP primaries          
NLTT 1011 B ... 00 19 32.68 +40 18 55.4 K7 L2 17.615 ± 0.015 15.544 ± 0.059 68.2$_{-6.5}^{+6.6}$ 58.5 3990 ... 0.3–∼10z
GD 280 B ... 01 54 58.13 +48 19 59.1 DA M9 17.624 ± 0.013 16.034 ± 0.082 $77_{-26}^{+35}$ 63.4 4882 ... <10aa
NLTT 8245 B ... 02 33 23.52 +65 45 47.6 M0 M7 16.465 ± 0.007 14.922 ± 0.052 $53.0_{-7.5}^{+8.7}$ 10.6 562 ... 0.3–∼10z
LSPM J0241+2553 B ... 02 41 51.51 +25 53 43.4 WD L1 19.074 ± 0.05 17.027 ± 0.180 $69_{-23}^{+35}$ 31.2 2153 ... <10aa
HD 253662 B ... 06 13 53.35 +15 14 04.4 G8IV L0.5 17.691 ± 0.02 15.961 ±.0082 >62.3 20.1 >1252 ... <10aa
LSPMJ0632+5053 B ... 06 32 48.55 +50 53 33.6 G2 L1.5 18.86 ± 0.04 16.383 ± 0.108 95.0$_{-13.9}^{+16.3}$ 47.4 4499 ... 0.2–∼10y
NLTT 18587 B ... 07 54 13.38 +37 21 42.6 M2 M7.5 18.03 ± 0.026 16.894 ± 0.199 $132_{-31}^{+40}$ 92.4 12200 ... 0.3–∼1z
NLTT 19109 B ... 08 11 59.00 −08 58 01.6 M4 M8.5 18.36 ± 0.044 16.933 ± 0.170 $132_{-36}^{+49}$ 7.5 362 ... 0.3–∼10z
NLTT 22073 Bg ... 09 33 37.11 −27 52 45.4 M2 M7.5 16.303 ± 0.007 14.671 ± 0.037 29.9$_{-6.9}^{+12.7}$ 26 776 ... 0.4–∼10x
NLTT 23716 B ... 10 13 17.05 −06 01 22.9 K7 M8 15.884 ± 0.006 14.300 ± 0.036 $48.2_{-6.8}^{+7.9}$ 15.0 723 ... 0.3–∼10z
NLTT 26746 B ... 11 15 01.22 +16 07 00.8 M4 L4 18.36 ± 0.06 16.403 ± 0.118 41.0$_{-10.3}^{+12.2}$ 18.0 661 ... 0.3–∼10z
NLTT 29395 B ... 12 03 02.61 +58 06 02.4 M3 M8 17.397 ± 0.013 15.810 ± 0.080 $56.4_{-13.0}^{+16.9}$ 11.9 671 ... 0.3–∼10z
NLTT 30510 B ... 12 22 18.59 +36 43 48.1 M2 M9.5 17.716 ± 0.016 15.971 ± 0.080 $49.1_{-11.3}^{+14.8}$ 19.6 962 ... 0.3–∼10z
NLTT 31450 B ... 12 39 49.19 +32 09 03.1 M4 L6 18.34 ± 0.03 16.135 ± 0.105 34.6$_{-8.7}^{+10.3}$ 12.3 487 ... 0.3–∼10z
PMI 13410+0542 B ... 13 41 02.39 +05 42 48.8 M1 L4 18.00 ± 0.02 16.187 ± 0.143 51.3$_{-11.8}^{+21.7}$ 9.4 484 ... 0.3–∼10z
PMI 13518+4157 B ... 13 51 47.41 +41 57 47.4 M2.5 L1.5 17.17 ± 0.01 15.081 ± 0.032 43.1$_{-8.8}^{+9.9}$ 21.6 613 ... 0.3–∼10z
NLTT 38489 B ... 14 48 46.28 +56 10 57.8 M4 M9 18.62 ± 0.04 16.64 ± 0.143 62.3$_{-17.0}^{+23.3}$ 6.7 418 ... 1.2–∼10x
NLTT 39312 B ... 15 05 59.27 +33 39 30.2 M2 M8 17.768 ± 0.018 16.09 ± 0.096 140.9$_{-32.7}^{+42.6}$ 5.1 713 ... 0.3–∼10z
LSPM J1627+3328 B ... 16 27 01.44 +33 28 21.4 K7 M9 16.386 ± 0.018 14.362 ± 0.083 38.0$_{-5.4}^{+6.3}$ 9.0 341 ... 0.3–∼10z
NLTT 44368 B ... 17 11 57.29 +54 30 43.8 M3 L1.5 16.754 ± 0.016 14.736 ± 0.058 55.0$_{-11.3}^{+12.7}$ 90.2 7760 ... 0.3–∼10z
LSPM J1717+5925 B ... 17 17 30.94 +59 25 30.2 G6 M9 18.043 ± 0.015 16.580 ± 0.168 108.0$_{-26.4}^{+34.8}$ 14.4 1555 ... 0.2–∼10y
NLTT 52268 B ... 21 51 07.23 +30 45 54.7 M3 M9 16.67 ± 0.03 14.945 ± 0.052 37.3$_{-8.7}^{+11.3}$ 14.7 549 ... 0.3–∼10z
LSPM J2153+1157 B ... 21 53 46.92 +11 57 46.4 M3 M7 16.005 ± 0.004 14.403 ± 0.038 36.2$_{-8.4}^{+10.9}$ 11.3 408 ... 0.3–∼10z
PM I22118−1005 B ... 22 11 41.25 −10 08 20.8 M2 L1.5 17.412 ± 0.010 15.246 ± 0.049 37.4$_{-7.7}^{+8.6}$ 204.5 8892 ... 0.3–∼10z
NLTT 55219 B ... 22 54 28.58 +22 02 56.1 M2 L5.5 18.791 ± 0.039 16.313 ± 0.122 44.7$_{-10.4}^{+13.5}$ 9.7 432 ... 0.3–∼10z
Serendipitous Companion Discoveries          
NLTT 730 B ... 00 15 02.40 +29 59 29.8 M4 L7.5pd 18.37 ± 0.06 16.16 ± 0.08 21.7$_{-5.3}^{+8.1}$ 233.6 5070 ... 3–∼10z
NLTT 27966 B ... 11 36 39.44 +48 52 43.0 M5 L4 18.48 ± 0.05 16.155 ± 0.103 39.6$_{-10.2}^{+13.3}$ 15.9 630 ... 0.3–∼10z
LSPMJ1336+2541 B ... 13 36 24.89 +25 40 37.2 M3 L4 19.45 ± 0.09 16.863 ± 0.16 60.7$_{-13.9}^{+15.7}$ 121.7 8793 ... 0.3–∼10z
HIP 73169 Be ... 14 57 11.35 −06 19 27.4 M0 L2.5 18.42 ± 0.09 16.007 ± 0.09 [27.3$_{-6.3}^{+8.3}$] 29.1 796 ... 0.3–∼10z
PM I23492+3458 B ... 23 49 15.11 +34 58 55.3 M2 L9 18.80 ± 0.04 16.298 ± 0.105 30.7$_{-6.3}^{+7.1}$ 34.9 949 ... 0.3–∼10z
Unlikely Companions          
NLTT 35593 B ... 13 54 34.92−06 07 34.3 M2 L2 18.56 ± 0.03 16.299 ± 0.114 63.0$_{-14.6}^{+19.1}$ 1105.8 69706 ... 0.3–∼10'z

Notes.[] Denotes distance from trigonometric parallax; all other distances are photometric. † Previously known in the Washington Double Star Catalog. ‡ Additional possibly spurious companion in the system in the Washington Double Star Catalog. * Simultaneously discovered by Allen et al. (2012). aOur object appears in the Washington Double Star Catalog as component C due to a spurious companion listed as B. bPrimary is itself a close double listed as Aa and Ab in the Washington Double Star Catalog. cThe companion was identified as a visual double during IRTF acquisition; due to saturation, it does not appear in our PS1 catalog. Position is taken from VISTA image. dSpectral type from Kirkpatrick et al. (2010). We identify this object as a companion to NLTT 730. eWhile HIP 73169 appears in the Hipparcos catalog, its parallax measurement was too low significance for it to be included in our input Hipparcos sample. Hence it appears in our sample of other primaries due to it being a nearby M dwarf in the proper motion catalog of Salim & Gould (2003). fPrimary is itself a binary with a listing in the Washington Double Star Catalog. Our companion is component C. gPreviously identified by Deacon & Hambly (2007) as a binary pair. The secondary is also known as SIPS 0933−2752 hThe 2MASS photometry is only an upper limit; photometry taken from UKIDSS Lawrence et al. (2007). iValenti & Fischer (2005). jCasagrande et al. (2011). kMetallicity definition depends on source; metallicities from i are [M/H] while those from j are [Fe/H]. lEstimated spectral types from spectral deblending. See Section 5.2.1. mPreviously identified as a candidate companion by Pinfield et al. (2006). oMetallicity from Lee et al. (2011). wRobinson et al. (2007). xThis work, minimum age calculated from lack of activity and the activity lifetimes of West et al. (2008), approximate maximum age from disk-like kinematics. yThis work, minimum age calculated from limiting X-ray flux and the relations of Mamajek & Hillenbrand (2008), approximate maximum age from disk-like kinematics. zThis work, minimum age is that from Shkolnik et al. (2009) for objects with no X-ray emission, approximate maximum age from disk-like kinematics. aaThis work, approximate maximum age from disk-like kinematics. 1 Object primary is a spectroscopic binary. 2 Previously identified in Lépine & Bongiorno (2007).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2 3

Table 3. PS1 Data of Our Wide Companions

Object Position SpT gP1 rP1 iP1 zP1 yP1
(Eq. = J2000 Ep. = 2010.0) (mag) (mag) (mag) (mag) (mag)
HIP search companions  
HIP 2397 B 00 30 24.94 +22 44 47.1 L0.5 ... ... 19.085 ± 0.013 17.49 ± 0.022 16.606 ± 0.008
HIP 6217 C 01 19 44.74 +00 06 18.5 M9.5 21.656 ± 0.11 21.076 ± 0.071 18.6 ± 0.019 17.444 ± 0.007 16.859 ± 0.009
HIP 6407 B 01 22 16.99 +03 31 22.0 L1+T3d ... ... 20.094 ± 0.042 18.534 ± 0.015 17.527 ± 0.027
HIP 9269 B‡ 01 59 10.98 +33 12 27.8 L6 ... ... ... ... 18.266 ± 0.031
HIP 10033 B 02 09 10.58 −02 19 19.0 M5 19.709 ± 0.017 18.297 ± 0.007 16.456 ± 0.003 15.54 ± 0.003 15.14 ± 0.003
HIP 11161 B 02 23 36.59 +52 40 05.9 L1.5 ... ... 21.24 ± 0.095 19.475 ± 0.051 18.785 ± 0.067
HIP 13589 B* 02 55 07.10 +21 36 21.1 M7.5 ... ... ... 18.003 ± 0.012 17.098 ± 0.009
HIP 26653 05 39 49.51 +52 53 58.3 L5 ... 20.542 ± 0.043 ... 17.719 ± 0.011 16.905 ± 0.012
HIP 32728 B 06 49 30.59 +36 26 26.0 M6.5 ... 21.26 ± 0.08 18.057 ± 0.006 16.721 ± 0.007 16.060 ± 0.006
HIP 37283 B† 07 39 32.03 +50 31 07.3 M6 18.985 ± 0.01 17.622 ± 0.006 15.593 ± 0.002 14.639 ± 0.001 14.214 ± 0.002
HIP 46984 B 09 34 33.18 +03 34 07.0 M4 18.199 ± 0.006 17.038 ± 0.004 15.444 ± 0.003 14.848 ± 0.002 14.521 ± 0.002
HIP 49046 B† 10 00 35.71 +27 17 06.7 M6.5 20.127 ± 0.021 18.7 ± 0.007 16.282 ± 0.002 15.138 ± 0.002 14.482 ± 0.002
HIP 51877 B 10 35 54.72 +36 55 41.0 M9.5 ... 20.23 ± 0.039 19.207 ± 0.011 17.801 ± 0.004 16.935 ± 0.008
HIP 52463 B 10 43 26.65 −18 52 18.2 M5 19.576 ± 0.018 18.25 ± 0.02 16.599 ± 0.011 15.479 ± 0.001 15.043 ± 0.003
HIP 55666 B‡ 11 24 23.43 −05 54 09.8 M5.5 ... ... ... ... 14.533 ± 0.037
HIP 58918 B† 12 04 52.15 +34 37 23.2 M7 21.445 ± 0.092 20.122 ± 0.026 17.623 ± 0.006 16.491 ± 0.004 15.849 ± 0.004
HIP 59310 B† 12 10 09.79 +18 58 07.9 M7 21.021 ± 0.052 19.579 ± 0.012 17.077 ± 0.005 15.88 ± 0.002 15.252 ± 0.002
HIP 59933 B 12 17 36.41 +14 27 11.7 L1 ... ... ... 19.079 ± 0.025 18.111 ± 0.032
HIP 60501 B† 12 24 09.68 +03 56 03.3 M5 17.074 ± 0.004 15.814 ± 0.002 14.207 ± 0.038 13.313 ± 0.001 12.876 ± 0.022
HIP 60987 B†c 12 30 01.60 −06 01 23.7 K7          
HIP 60987 C† 12 30 00.68 −06 01 17.9 M3 15.395 ± 0.005 14.336 ± 0.001 ... 12.825 ± 0.001 12.553 ± 0.001
HIP 63506 C‡ 13 00 50.27 +42 14 47.6 L1 ... 22.019 ± 0.122 19.49 ± 0.014 17.964 ± 0.007 16.999 ± 0.008
HIP 65706 B† 13 28 20.77 +30 03 17.0 M7 ... ... ... ... 15.016 ± 0.003
HIP 65780 Cf 13 29 06.09 +11 27 52.2 M5 18.523 ± 0.001 17.393 ± 0.001 15.669 ± 0.001 14.724 ± 0.001 14.327 ± 0.001
HIP 70623 C† 14 26 45.74 −05 10 20.9 M5.5 17.424 ± 0.008 16.233 ± 0.013 14.762 ± 0.061 13.981 ± 0.001 13.619 ± 0.003
HIP 75310 B 15 23 10.01 −10 28 58.4 M5 20.018 ± 0.062 ... 15.647 ± 0.003 15.055 ± 0.003 14.668 ± 0.003
HIP 76456 B† 15 36 56.27 +29 59 31.1 M6.5 19.827 ± 0.017 19.027 ± 0.006 16.513 ± 0.002 15.343 ± 0.002 14.753 ± 0.002
HIP 76641 B 15 38 59.53 +43 52 17.2 M3.5 ... ... 17.225 ± 0.036 13.026 ± 0.001 12.158 ± 0.001
HIP 78184 B 15 57 55.32 +59 14 25.3 M9 ... 21.043 ± 0.054 18.642 ± 0.014 17.167 ± 0.013 16.219 ± 0.024
HIP 78859 B† 16 05 49.62 +34 59 53.9 M5 16.9 ± 0.004 15.633 ± 0.024 14.422 ± 0.004 13.832 ± 0.009 13.57 ± 0.009
HIP 78916 B 16 06 32.22 +22 53 34.5 M8 22.05 ± 0.16 19.694 ± 0.021 18.506 ± 0.009 17.354 ± 0.006 16.694 ± 0.008
HIP 78923 B 16 06 38.65 +34 06 19.3 M8 ... ... 17.219 ± 0.006 16.187 ± 0.002 15.565 ± 0.004
HIP 79180 B† 16 09 42.06 +65 49 18.1 M5 20.008 ± 0.02 18.815 ± 0.013 16.718 ± 0.003 15.985 ± 0.003 15.315 ± 0.003
HIP 80258 B† 16 23 09.09 +36 50 50.2 M4 18.321 ± 0.062 16.993 ± 0.023 15.497 ± 0.002 14.782 ± 0.111 14.487 ± 0.004
HIP 81910 B 16 43 49.50 −26 48 40.2 M6 ... 17.478 ± 0.068 15.494 ± 0.012 14.678 ± 0.344 13.852 ± 0.025
HIP 82233 B 16 48 03.98 −15 57 56.7 M5.5 ... 15.693 ± 0.003 14.218 ± 0.001 ... 13.198 ± 0.009
HIP 83651 B† 17 05 49.00 +04 57 24.8 M3 14.977 ± 0.001 13.978 ± 0.035 12.809 ± 0.07 12.018 ± 0.001 12.529 ± 0.052
HIP 84840 B 17 20 22.02 +20 17 01.1 M4 17.489 ± 0.019 16.272 ± 0.008 14.869 ± 0.002 14.126 ± 0.014 13.852 ± 0.007
HIP 85365 B 17 26 22.29 −05 02 11.2 L5.5 ... ... 21.606 ± 0.13 19.547 ± 0.05 18.55 ± 0.045
HIP 86722 B† 17 43 15.32 +21 36 04.2 M5.5 ... ... ... 14.184 ± 0.003 12.971 ± 0.018
HIP 88728 B 18 06 50.92 +08 52 24.0 DA ... 14.377 ± 0.203 ... 13.66 ± 0.002 12.571 ± 0.019
HIP 90273 B 18 25 11.57 +30 16 43.2 M3.5 16.348 ± 0.003 15.307 ± 0.294 13.905 ± 0.066 13.117 ± 0.004 12.891 ± 0.054
HIP 90869 B 18 32 11.05 −26 29 45.1 M2 15.375 ± 0.024 14.156 ± 0.026 ... 12.443 ± 0.001 12.428 ± 0.042
HIP 93967 B 19 07 56.43 −15 14 16.3 M3.5 17.723 ± 0.023 ... 15.433 ± 0.028 14.75 ± 0.027 14.529 ± 0.007
HIP 97168 B 19 44 59.38 +51 35 31.3 M5.5 18.5 ± 0.014 17.241 ± 0.009 16.081 ± 0.007 15.38 ± 0.007 14.997 ± 0.004
HIP 98535 Cf 20 01 02.17 +48 16 27.8 M5.5 19.513 ± 0.046 ... 16.077 ± 0.031 15.183 ± 0.057 14.763 ± 0.065
HIP 102582 B† 20 47 16.75 +10 51 45.1 M5 17.437 ± 0.003 16.140 ± 0.003 14.408 ± 0.001 13.601 ± 0.002 13.256 ± 0.001
HIP 103199 B† 20 54 33.60 +30 45 40.6 M3.5 16.513 ± 0.004 ... 15.03 ± 0.912 13.415 ± 0.005 13.161 ± 0.01
HIP 105202 B† 21 18 42.31 +08 56 45.0 M4 17.221 ± 0.097 15.867 ± 0.031 14.41 ± 0.01 13.718 ± 0.002 13.456 ± 0.019
HIP 106551 B 21 34 45.17 +38 31 00.1 M5 19.019 ± 0.056 17.677 ± 0.034 15.958 ± 0.01 14.979 ± 0.01 14.597 ± 0.01
HIP 108822 B† 22 02 48.15 +12 07 05.0 M3 15.019 ± 0.007 13.995 ± 0.185 13.459 ± 0.451 12.478 ± 0.092 12.079 ± 0.002
HIP 109454 B 22 10 27.58 +30 48 28.1 M3 16.605 ± 0.004 ... ... 13.895 ± 0.002 13.729 ± 0.116
HIP 111657 B† 22 37 08.65 +11 58 53.0 M4 15.678 ± 0.011 14.389 ± 0.015 14.477 ± 0.337 ... 11.978 ± 0.041
HIP 112422 B‡b 22 46 18.57 +33 19 30.5 L1.5 ... ... 19.899 ± 0.041 18.907 ± 0.016 17.776 ± 0.021
HIP 114424 B†‡ 23 10 22.08 −07 48 54.7 M5.5 ... 16.296 ± 0.004 14.444 ± 0.004 13.548 ± 0.076 13.089 ± 0.001
HIP 114456 B†‡a 23 10 54.78 +45 30 43.8 M5 17.26 ± 0.054 ... 14.055 ± 0.001 13.063 ± 0.001 12.371 ± 0.003
HIP 115819 B 23 27 49.76 +04 51 00.1 M8 ... ... 19.272 ± 0.023 ... 16.865 ± 0.022
HIP 116052 B‡ 23 30 52.38 +27 46 32.3 M3.5 ... ... ... 14.013 ± 0.02 13.718 ± 0.002
Companions to faint non-HIP primaries  
NLTT 1011 B 00 19 32.68 +40 18 55.4 L2 ... ... 20.203 ± 0.034 18.651 ± 0.013 17.615 ± 0.015
GD 280 01 54 58.13 +48 19 59.1 M9 ... ... 19.915 ± 0.017 18.524 ± 0.017 17.624 ± 0.013
NLTT 8245 02 33 23.52 +65 45 47.6 M7 ... ... 18.689 ± 0.015 17.362 ± 0.005 16.465 ± 0.007
LSPM J0241+2553 02 41 51.51 +25 53 43.4 L1 ... ... 21.357 ± 0.132 19.986 ± 0.065 19.074 ± 0.05
HD 253662 06 13 53.35 +15 14 04.4 L0.5 ... 21.39 ± 0.109 20.306 ± 0.073 18.692 ± 0.022 17.691 ± 0.02
LSPMJ0632+5053 B 06 32 48.55 +50 53 33.6 L1.5 ... ... ... 19.86 ± 0.12 18.86 ± 0.04
NLTT 18587 07 54 13.38 +37 21 42.6 M7.5 ... ... 20.507 ± 0.057 18.879 ± 0.019 18.03 ± 0.026
NLTT 19109 08 11 59.00 −08 58 01.6 M8.5 ... ... 20.679 ± 0.042 19.193 ± 0.023 18.36 ± 0.044
NLTT 22073 B 09 33 37.11 −27 52 45.4 M7.5 ... 21.185 ± 0.047 18.619 ± 0.007 17.115 ± 0.006 16.303 ± 0.007
NLTT 23716 10 13 17.05 −06 01 22.9 M8 22.289 ± 0.221 ... 17.995 ± 0.006 16.703 ± 0.005 15.884 ± 0.006
NLTT 26746 B 11 15 01.22 +16 07 00.8 L4 ... ... 21.23 ± 0.07 19.43 ± 0.05 18.36 ± 0.06
NLTT 29395 12 03 02.61 +58 06 02.4 M8 ... ... 19.605 ± 0.018 18.181 ± 0.008 17.397 ± 0.013
NLTT 30510 12 22 18.59 +36 43 48.1 M9.5 ... ... 20.371 ± 0.064 18.657 ± 0.014 17.716 ± 0.016
NLTT 31450 B 12 39 49.19 +32 09 03.1 L6 ... ... 20.8 ± 0.09 19.29 ± 0.02 18.34 ± 0.03
PMI 13410+0542 B 13 41 02.39 +05 42 48.8 L4 ... 21.5 ± 0.2 20.10 ± 0.05 18.92 ± 0.03 18.00 ± 0.02
PMI 13518+4157 B 13 51 47.41 +41 57 47.4 L1.5 ... 21.64 ± 0.13 19.636 ± 0.018 18.190 ± 0.009 17.17 ± 0.01
NLTT 38489 B 14 48 46.28 +56 10 57.8 M9 ... ... 20.88 ± 0.05 19.52 ± 0.04 18.62 ± 0.04
NLTT 39312 B 15 05 59.27 +33 39 30.2 M8 ... ... 19.588 ± 0.018 18.476 ± 0.017 17.768 ± 0.018
LSPM J1627+3328 B 16 27 01.44 +33 28 21.4 M9 ... ... 18.94 ± 0.16 17.32 ± 0.03 16.386 ± 0.018
NLTT 44368 B 17 11 57.29 +54 30 43.8 L1.5 ... 21.28 ± 0.07 ... 17.688 ± 0.011 16.754 ± 0.016
LSPM J1717+5925 B 17 17 30.94 +59 25 30.2 M9 ... ... 20.232 ± 0.053 18.890 ± 0.013 18.043 ± 0.015
NLTT 52268 B 21 51 07.23 +30 45 54.7 M9 ... ... 19.08 ± 0.01 17.63 ± 0.01 16.67 ± 0.03
LSPM J2153+1157 B 21 53 46.92 +11 57 46.4 M7 22.28 ± 0.08 20.90 ± 0.03 18.149 ± 0.005 16.787 ± 0.003 16.005 ± 0.004
PM I22118−1005 B 22 11 41.25 −10 08 20.8 L1.5 ... 22.28 ± 0.14 19.77 ± 0.02 18.347 ± 0.010 17.412 ± 0.010
NLTT 55219 B 22 54 28.58 +22 02 56.1 L5.5 ... ... ... 19.665 ± 0.04 18.791 ± 0.039
Serendipitous Companion Discoveries  
NLTT 730 B 00 15 02.40 +29 59 29.8 L7.5pd ... ... 21.63 ± 0.11 19.49 ± 0.04 18.37 ± 0.06
NLTT 27966 B 11 36 39.44 +48 52 43.0 L4 ... ... 21.06 ± 0.13 19.52 ± 0.03 18.48 ± 0.05
LSPMJ1336+2541 B 13 36 24.89 +25 40 37.2 L4 ... ... 22.19 ± 0.16 20.21 ± 0.07 19.45 ± 0.09
HIP 73169 Be 14 57 11.35 −06 19 27.4 L2.5 ... ... 20.55 ± 0.18 19.06 ± 0.02 18.42 ± 0.09
PM I23492+3458 B 23 49 15.11 +34 58 55.3 L9 ... ... ... 19.99 ± 0.04 18.80 ± 0.04
Unlikely Companions  
NLTT 35593 B 13 54 34.92−06 07 34.3 L2 ... ... 20.74 ± 0.12 19.37 ± 0.11 18.56 ± 0.03

Notes. † Previously known in the Washington Double Star Catalog. ‡ Additional possibly spurious companion in the system in the Washington Double Star Catalog. * Simultaneously discovered by Allen et al. (2012). aOur object appears in the Washington Double Star Catalog as component C due to a spurious companion listed as B. bPrimary is itself a close double listed as Aa and Ab in the Washington Double Star Catalog. cThe companion was identified as visual double during IRTF acquisition, due to saturation, it does not appear in our PS1 catalog, position is taken from VISTA image. dSpectral type from Kirkpatrick et al. (2010). We identify this object as a companion to NLTT 730. eWhile HIP 73169 appears in the Hipparcos catalog, its parallax measurement was too low-significance for it to be included in our input Hipparcos sample. Hence it appears in our sample of other primaries due to it being a nearby M dwarf in the proper motion catalog of Salim & Gould (2003). fPrimary is itself a binary with a listing in the Washington Double Star Catalog. Our companion is component C. gPreviously identified by Deacon & Hambly (2007) as a binary pair. The secondary is also known as SIPS 0933−2752.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

Table 4. Astrometric Data on Our Data of Our Multiple Systems

Object d μαcos δ μδ dμαcos δ dμδ dμ Projected Projected
Separation Separation
(pc) ('' yr−1) ('' yr−1) nσ nσ nσ ('') (AU)
HIP 2397 [33.9$_{-1.3}^{+1.4}$] 0.186 ± 0.001 −0.185 ± 0.001 3.2 2.1 3.8 117.1 3970
HIP 2397B 39.2$^{+7.6}_{-6.4}$ 0.2 ± 0.004 −0.176 ± 0.004          
HIP 6217 [101$^{+18}_{-13}$] 0.119 ± 0.001 0.030 ± 0.001 1.94 1.94 2.74 27.4 2767
HIP 6217 B 70.9$^{+14.0}_{-11.7}$ 0.111 ± 0.004 0.022 ± 0.004          
HIP 6407 [57.2$_{-3.0}^{+3.3}$] 0.046 ± 0.001 −0.159 ± 0.001 2.1 2.7 3.4 44.9 2570
HIP 6407B 53.6$^{+10.5}_{-8.8}$ 0.03 ± 0.008 −0.138 ± 0.008          
HIP 9269 [25.0$_{-0.4}^{+0.3}$] 0.244 ± 0.001 −0.352 ± 0.001 0.1 0.5 0.5 52.1 1300
HIP 9269B 27.8$^{+5.4}_{-4.5}$ 0.243 ± 0.011 −0.347 ± 0.011          
HIP 10033 [69.7$_{-3.1}^{+3.4}$] −0.093 ± 0.001 −0.046 ± 0.001 2.9 2.6 3.9 42.9 2990
HIP 10033B 89.5$^{+17.3}_{-14.5}$ −0.114 ± 0.007 −0.027 ± 0.007          
HIP 11161 [69.3$_{-3.6}^{+4.1}$] −0.081 ± 0.001 −0.061 ± 0.001 0.4 0.6 0.7 47.7 3300
HIP 11161B 83.6$^{+16.3}_{-13.6}$ −0.079 ± 0.005 −0.058 ± 0.005          
HIP 13589 [72.8$_{-4.0}^{+4.6}$] 0.148 ± 0.001 −0.097 ± 0.001 0.5 1.7 1.8 49.2 3580
HIP 13589B 64.6$^{+12.5}_{-10.5}$ 0.15 ± 0.005 −0.089 ± 0.005          
HIP 26653 27.9$^{+0.8}_{-0.7}$ −0.013 ± 0.001 −0.142 ± 0.001 2.91 2.94 4.66 27.0 753
HIP 26653 B 18.8$^{+3.7}_{-3.1}$ −0.001 ± 0.004 −0.157 ± 0.004          
HIP 32728 [46.6$_{-2.6}^{+2.9}$] 0.191 ± 0.001 −0.14 ± 0.001 0.2 0.9 1.0 94.3 4400
HIP 32728B 67.1$^{+13.4}_{-11.2}$ 0.188 ± 0.016 −0.13 ± 0.011          
HIP 37283 [45.5$_{-1.2}^{+1.2}$] −0.08 ± 0.001 −0.061 ± 0.001 1.4 0.6 1.6 106.1 4830
HIP 37283B 34.6$^{+7.4}_{-6.1}$ −0.087 ± 0.005 −0.058 ± 0.005          
HIP 46984 [74.7$_{-6.9}^{+8.6}$] 0.026 ± 0.002 0.108 ± 0.002 1.6 1.8 2.4 37.5 2800
HIP 46984B 111.9$^{+22.4}_{-18.6}$ 0.032 ± 0.004 0.101 ± 0.003          
HIP 49046 [34.7$_{-2.3}^{+2.6}$] −0.015 ± 0.002 0.119 ± 0.001 1.5 1.1 1.9 136.1 4720
HIP 49046B 33.3$^{+6.7}_{-5.6}$ −0.008 ± 0.005 0.113 ± 0.005          
HIP 51877 54.2$^{+2.3}_{-2.1}$ −0.063 ± 0.001 −0.122 ± 0.001 0.50 0.33 0.60 17.6 954
HIP 51877 B 57.4$^{+11.5}_{-9.6}$ −0.066 ± 0.006 −0.124 ± 0.006          
HIP 52463 [74.2$_{-4.5}^{+5.2}$] −0.07 ± 0.001 0.083 ± 0.001 1.1 2.2 2.4 43.5 3230
HIP 52463B 84.6$^{+16.9}_{-14.1}$ −0.064 ± 0.006 0.096 ± 0.006          
HIP 55666 [49.8$_{-1.5}^{+1.5}$] −0.085 ± 0.001 −0.093 ± 0.001 0.2 2.3 2.3 37.2 1850
HIP 55666B 42.2$^{+8.3}_{-6.9}$ −0.087 ± 0.009 −0.074 ± 0.009          
HIP 58918 [55.8$_{-5.1}^{+6.2}$] −0.297 ± 0.002 0.018 ± 0.001 1.1 2.9 3.1 20.0 1110
HIP 58918B 61.9$^{+12.3}_{-10.2}$ −0.289 ± 0.007 0.038 ± 0.007          
HIP 59310 [44.4$_{-2.8}^{+3.2}$] −0.157 ± 0.002 −0.041 ± 0.001 2.8 2.7 3.9 82.1 3650
HIP 59310B 42.4$^{+8.4}_{-7.0}$ −0.144 ± 0.004 −0.053 ± 0.004          
HIP 59933 [57.0$_{-2.4}^{+2.7}$] −0.103 ± 0.001 −0.036 ± 0.001 2.0 1.0 2.3 38.1 2170
HIP 59933B 67.8$^{+13.6}_{-11.3}$ −0.088 ± 0.007 −0.029 ± 0.007          
HIP 60501 [56.6$_{-6.0}^{+7.6}$] −0.012 ± 0.002 −0.134 ± 0.001 1.6 0.7 1.8 37.1 2100
HIP 60501B 30.8$^{+6.0}_{-5.0}$ −0.001 ± 0.006 −0.13 ± 0.006          
HIP 60987 [61.9$_{-2.3}^{+2.4}$] −0.108 ± 0.001 −0.068 ± 0.001 1.0 1.5 1.8 19.0 1170
HIP 60987C 64.6$^{+12.9}_{-10.8}$ −0.104 ± 0.004 −0.074 ± 0.004          
HIP 63506 [42.5$_{-3.9}^{+4.7}$] −0.396 ± 0.002 0.026 ± 0.002 0.5 0.0 0.5 132.8 5640
HIP 63506 C 45.0$^{+9.0}_{-7.5}$ −0.401 ± 0.009 0.026 ± 0.009          
HIP 65706 [51.1$_{-4.0}^{+4.8}$] −0.186 ± 0.002 −0.185 ± 0.001 2.2 2.3 3.2 52.6 2690
HIP 65706B 34.4$^{+6.8}_{-5.7}$ −0.176 ± 0.004 −0.175 ± 0.004          
HIP 65780 [58.0$_{-3.3}^{+3.7}$] −0.193 ± 0.001 −0.218 ± 0.001 1.56 1.51 2.2 16.0 928
HIP 65780 C 60.8$^{+11.9}_{-9.9}$ −0.179 ± 0.009 −0.204 ± 0.009          
HIP 70623 [72.6$_{-4.7}^{+5.5}$] −0.152 ± 0.001 −0.148 ± 0.001 0.4 1.7 1.8 41.9 3040
HIP 70623 C 33.1$^{+6.5}_{-5.4}$ −0.154 ± 0.003 −0.142 ± 0.003          
HIP 75310 [66.9$_{-5.1}^{+6.0}$] −0.025 ± 0.001 −0.154 ± 0.001 0.3 0.3 0.4 22.9 1530
HIP 75310B 71.8$^{+14.3}_{-12.0}$ −0.023 ± 0.004 −0.153 ± 0.004          
HIP 76456 [36.8$_{-0.6}^{+0.6}$] 0.089 ± 0.001 −0.057 ± 0.001 0.3 1.8 1.9 36.1 1330
HIP 76456B 41.6$^{+8.3}_{-6.9}$ 0.09 ± 0.004 −0.064 ± 0.004          
HIP 76641 [82.1$_{-4.7}^{+5.3}$] −0.104 ± 0.001 0.031 ± 0.001 1.7 0.7 1.8 42.1 3460
HIP 76641B 41.6$_{-9.6}^{+13.4}$ −0.11 ± 0.004 0.028 ± 0.004          
HIP 78184 [31.4$_{-1.3}^{+1.4}$] −0.296 ± 0.001 0.202 ± 0.002 1.6 1.5 2.2 121.8 3820
HIP 78184B 40.3$^{+7.9}_{-6.6}$ −0.285 ± 0.006 0.213 ± 0.006          
HIP 78859 [57.2$_{-2.1}^{+2.3}$] −0.06 ± 0.001 −0.252 ± 0.001 1.2 0.6 1.4 42.6 2440
HIP 78859B 44.9$^{+8.7}_{-7.3}$ −0.056 ± 0.003 −0.254 ± 0.003          
HIP 78916 [92.9$_{-9.2}^{+11.5}$] −0.098 ± 0.0010 0.092 ± 0.0010 2.9 0.6 3.0 35.5 3294
HIP 78916 B 70.6$^{+13.8}_{-11.6}$ −0.080 ± 0.006 0.095 ± 0.006          
HIP 78923 [46.1$_{-1.7}^{+1.8}$] −0.301 ± 0.0010 0.184 ± 0.0010 1.9 3.2 3.7 15.5 714
HIP 78923 B 44.5$^{+8.8}_{-7.3}$ −0.315 ± 0.007 0.206 ± 0.007          
HIP 79180 [74.7$_{-3.4}^{+3.7}$] 0.092 ± 0.001 −0.258 ± 0.001 0.9 1.6 1.9 29.0 2170
HIP 79180B 93.7$^{+18.7}_{-15.6}$ 0.096 ± 0.005 −0.265 ± 0.004          
HIP 80258 [63.7$_{-7.5}^{+9.6}$] −0.181 ± 0.002 0.144 ± 0.002 2.2 2.4 3.3 54.9 3500
HIP 80258B 103$^{+21}_{-17}$ −0.173 ± 0.003 0.135 ± 0.003          
HIP 81910 [46.4$_{-0.8}^{+0.9}$] −0.02 ± 0.001 −0.103 ± 0.001 0.6 1.5 1.6 26.7 1240
HIP 81910B 31.3$^{+6.1}_{-5.1}$ −0.023 ± 0.007 −0.093 ± 0.007          
HIP 82233 [42.1$_{-1.2}^{+1.3}$] 0.076 ± 0.001 −0.092 ± 0.001 1.4 2.6 3.0 30.4 1280
HIP 82233B 29.7$^{+5.9}_{-4.9}$ 0.085 ± 0.006 −0.075 ± 0.006          
HIP 83651 [50.9$_{-4.2}^{+4.9}$] −0.142 ± 0.002 0.136 ± 0.002 1.6 1.7 2.4 28.9 1470
HIP 83651B 53.8$^{+10.8}_{-9.0}$ −0.149 ± 0.003 0.13 ± 0.003          
HIP 84840 [$112_{-15}^{+19}$] −0.051 ± 0.001 −0.174 ± 0.001 0.6 1.9 2.0 16.9 1890
HIP 84840B 77.9$_{-13.0}^{+15.6}$ −0.049 ± 0.003 −0.168 ± 0.003          
HIP 85365 [30.1$_{-0.2}^{+0.2}$] −0.092 ± 0.001 −0.043 ± 0.001 0.8 3.8 3.9 294.1 8850
HIP 85365B 34.7$^{+6.8}_{-5.7}$ −0.087 ± 0.006 −0.019 ± 0.006          
HIP 86722 [22.7$_{-0.5}^{+0.4}$] −0.123 ± 0.001 −0.62 ± 0.001 1.7 1.2 2.1 22.8 520
HIP 86722B 25.7$^{+5.0}_{-4.2}$ −0.112 ± 0.007 −0.628 ± 0.007          
HIP 88728 [$40.4_{-1.1}^{+1.2}$] 0.040 ± 0.001 −0.150 ± 0.001 0.6 3.3 3.4 9.6 316
HIP 88728B ... 0.036 ±0.005 −0.133 ± 0.005          
HIP 90273 [55.4$_{-7.3}^{+10.0}$] 0.006 ± 0.002 0.257 ± 0.003 2.5 0.8 2.7 26.9 1490
HIP 90273B 59.5$^{+11.8}_{-9.8}$ 0.016 ± 0.003 0.26 ± 0.003          
HIP 90869 [56.4$_{-3.0}^{+3.4}$] −0.144 ± 0.001 −0.122 ± 0.001 2.5 0.1 2.5 17.5 990
HIP 90869B 83.6$^{+16.9}_{-14.1}$ −0.134 ± 0.004 −0.121 ± 0.004          
HIP 93967 [122.1$_{-19.6}^{+29.0}$] −0.146 ± 0.002 −0.276 ± 0.001 0.3 0.1 0.3 22.2 2710
HIP 93967B 135.1$^{+26.9}_{-22.4}$ −0.145 ± 0.005 −0.275 ± 0.005          
HIP 97168 [97.5$_{-10.4}^{+13.1}$] 0.127 ± 0.001 0.136 ± 0.001 0.6 3.1 3.2 12.6 1230
HIP 97168B 72.9$^{+14.3}_{-12.0}$ 0.124 ± 0.004 0.149 ± 0.004          
HIP 98535 [60.0$_{-3.3}^{+3.8}$] −0.113 ± 0.001 −0.095 ± 0.001 0.2 1.9 1.9 61.7 3700
HIP 98535C 56.0$^{+11.0}_{-9.2}$ −0.114 ± 0.005 −0.086 ± 0.005          
HIP 102582 [31.3$_{-1.3}^{+1.4}$] 0.091 ± 0.0020 −0.592 ± 0.0010 0.5 1.8 1.9 14.7 459
HIP 102582 B 40.7$^{+7.9}_{-6.6}$ 0.093 ± 0.005 −0.583 ± 0.005          
HIP 103199 [59.5$_{-4.3}^{+5.1}$] 0.15 ± 0.001 0.057 ± 0.001 3.1 2.3 3.8 10.9 650
HIP 103199B 73.6$^{+14.7}_{-12.3}$ 0.135 ± 0.005 0.046 ± 0.005          
HIP 105202 [41.8$_{-1.3}^{+1.4}$] 0.144 ± 0.001 −0.041 ± 0.001 0.9 0.3 1.0 89.4 3740
HIP 105202B 64.1$^{+12.8}_{-10.7}$ 0.147 ± 0.003 −0.04 ± 0.003          
HIP 106551 [71.0$_{-2.1}^{+2.2}$] 0.116 ± 0.001 0.095 ± 0.001 0.9 0.8 1.2 66.1 4690
HIP 106551B 67.9$^{+13.2}_{-11.0}$ 0.119 ± 0.004 0.092 ± 0.004          
HIP 108822 [44.4$_{-6.1}^{+8.5}$] −0.025 ± 0.004 −0.354 ± 0.004 3.6 1.2 3.8 31.8 1410
HIP 108822B 53.1$^{+10.7}_{-8.9}$ −0.046 ± 0.004 −0.347 ± 0.004          
HIP 109454 [100.9$_{-5.8}^{+6.5}$] −0.069 ± 0.001 −0.091 ± 0.001 0.4 1.9 1.9 18.2 1840
HIP 109454B 109.7$^{+22.0}_{-18.3}$ −0.072 ± 0.005 −0.081 ± 0.005          
HIP 111657 [41.9$_{-3.0}^{+3.3}$] −0.248 ± 0.002 −0.187 ± 0.002 2.4 2.5 3.5 7.8 330
HIP 111657B 34.9$^{+7.0}_{-5.8}$ −0.259 ± 0.004 −0.176 ± 0.004          
HIP 112422 [65.4$_{-6.6}^{+8.3}$] 0.148 ± 0.002 0.031 ± 0.001 1.6 1.1 1.9 16.0 1040
HIP 112422B 64.7$^{+12.6}_{-10.5}$ 0.168 ± 0.012 0.044 ± 0.012          
HIP 114424 [35.1$_{-0.9}^{+1.1}$] 0.138 ± 0.001 −0.136 ± 0.001 2.0 0.0 2.0 42.0 1480
HIP 114424B 26.3$^{+5.2}_{-4.3}$ 0.146 ± 0.004 −0.136 ± 0.004          
HIP 114456 [24.3$_{-0.3}^{+0.3}$] −0.087 ± 0.001 −0.287 ± 0.001 2.2 2.7 3.5 50.4 1220
HIP 114456B 23.9$^{+4.6}_{-3.9}$ −0.097 ± 0.005 −0.3 ± 0.005          
HIP 115819 [65.7$_{-8.2}^{+11.0}$] 0.441 ± 0.003 0.181 ± 0.002 0.9 2.4 2.5 30.4 2000
HIP 115819B 64.0$^{+12.5}_{-10.5}$ 0.435 ± 0.006 0.196 ± 0.006          
HIP 116052 [49.6$_{-2.3}^{+2.5}$] −0.137 ± 0.001 −0.133 ± 0.001 0.2 1.0 1.0 26.8 1330
HIP 116052 B 87.2$^{+17.5}_{-14.6}$ −0.136 ± 0.004 −0.129 ± 0.004          

Notes. nσ is the number of standard deviations the proper motions differ by. [...] denotes distance from trigonometric parallax; all other distances are photometric.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2 3

Table 5. The Data of Our Non-Hipparcos and Serendipitous Pairs

Object distance μαcos δ μδ dμαcos δ dμδ dμ Projected Projected
Separation Separation
(pc) ('' yr−1) ('' yr−1) nσ nσ nσ ('') (AU)
Other Companion Discoveries
NLTT 1011 68.2$_{-6.5}^{+6.6}$a −0.076 ± 0.008f −0.192 ± 0.008 0.08 0.43 0.44 58.5 3990
NLTT 1011B 46.1$^{+9.3}_{-7.7}$b −0.077 ± 0.007 −0.197 ± 0.007          
GD 280 77$^{+35}_{-26}$ 0.171 ± 0.008 −0.059 ± 0.008f 0.32 0.53 0.62 63.4 4882
GD 280 B 82.3$^{+16.7}_{-13.9}$ 0.174 ± 0.005 −0.054 ± 0.005          
NLTT 8245 53.0$^{+8.7}_{-7.5}$ −0.096 ± 0.008 −0.164 ± 0.008f 0.42 0.21 0.47 10.6 562
NLTT 8245 B 72.9$^{+14.6}_{-12.2}$ −0.092 ± 0.005 −0.162 ± 0.005          
LSPM J0241+2553 69$^{+35}_{-23}$ −0.032 ± 0.008 −0.158 ± 0.008f 1.41 0.70 1.58 31.2 2153
LSPM J0241+2553 B 93.1$^{+20.2}_{-16.62}$ −0.048 ± 0.008 −0.150 ± 0.008          
HD 253662 >62.3 0.020 ± 0.001 −0.157 ± 0.001i 0.20 0.50 0.54 20.1 >1252
HD 253662 B 67.2$^{+13.7}_{-11.4}$ −0.022 ± 0.010 −0.162 ± 0.010          
LSPM J0632+5053 95.0$_{-13.9}^{+16.3}$a 0.035 ± 0.008f −0.154 ± 0.008 2.1 1.2 2.4 47.4 4499
LSPM J0632+5053 B 85.3$^{+16.7}_{-14.0}$b 0.054 ± 0.004 −0.143 ± 0.004          
NLTT 18587 132$^{+40}_{-31}$ 0.167 ± 0.008 −0.089 ± 0.008f 1.06 0.09 2.37 92.4 12200
NLTT 18587 B 158$^{+36}_{-29}$ 0.155 ± 0.008 −0.0.88 ± 0.008          
NLTT 19109 48.2$^{+7.9}_{-6.8}$ 0.035 ± 0.008 −0.181 ± 0.008g 1.59 1.9 2.48 7.5 362
NLTT 19109 B 127$^{+25}_{-21}$ 0.050 ± 0.005 −0.163 ± 0.005          
NLTT 22073 29.9$_{-6.9}^{+12.7}$c −0.315 ± 0.008 0.16 ± 0.008g 1.1 1.5 1.8 26 776
NLTT 22073 B 62.2$^{+12.4}_{-10.4}$ −0.301 ± 0.014 0.141 ± 0.014          
NLTT 23716 48.2$^{+7.9}_{-6.8}$ 0.054 ± 0.005 −0.286 ± 0.005h 1.41 1.41 1.99 15.0 723
NLTT 23716 B 47.5$^{+9.3}_{-7.8}$ 0.063 ±.004 −0.277 ± 0.004          
NLTT 26746 41.0$_{-10.3}^{+12.2}$d −0.251 ± 0.008f −0.147 ± 0.008 1.22 0.87 1.5 18.0 661
NLTT 26746 B 42.5$^{+8.3}_{-6.9}$b −0.235 ± 0.01 −0.136 ± 0.01          
NLTT 29395 56.4$^{+16.9}_{-13.0}$ −0.182 ± 0.008 −0.115 ± 0.008f 2.01 0.78 2.16 11.9 671
NLTT 29395 B 96.0$^{+19.5}_{-16.2}$ −0.164 ± 0.004 −0.108 ± 0.004          
NLTT 30510 49.1$^{+14.8}_{-11.3}$ 0.215 ± 0.008 −0.067 ± 0.008 f 0.4 0.2.5 2.53 19.6 962
NLTT 30510 B 88.8$^{+18.1}_{-15.0}$ 0.219 ± 0.006 −0.042 ± 0.006          
NLTT 31450 34.6$_{-8.7}^{+10.3}$d −0.034 ± 0.008f −0.202 ± 0.008 −0.03 1.75 1.75 12.3 487
NLTT 31450 B 27.2$^{+5.3}_{-4.4}$b −0.034 ± 0.01 −0.18 ± 0.01          
PMI 13410+0542 51.3$_{-11.8}^{+21.7}$c 0.047 ± 0.008g −0.014 ± 0.008 1.7 1.8 2.5 9.4 484
PMI 13410+0542 B 44.3$^{+8.7}_{-7.2}$ 0.062 ± 0.004 −0.030 ± 0.004          
PMI 13518+4157 43.1$_{-8.8}^{+9.9}$d −0.059 ± 0.008g −0.058 ± 0.008 0.7 0.6 1.0 21.6 613
PMI 13518+4157 B 39.6$^{+7.9}_{-6.6}$ −0.05 ± 0.009 −0.065 ± 0.009          
NLTT 38489 62.3$_{-17.0}^{+23.3}$a −0.147 ± 0.008f 0.183 ± 0.008 0.7 1.4 1.6 6.7 418
NLTT 38489 B 128$^{+25}_{-21}$b −0.141 ± 0.004 0.170 ± 0.004          
NLTT 39312 141$_{-33}^{+43}$a −0.025 ± 0.008f −0.347 ± 0.008 4.3 1.2 4.4 5.1 713
NLTT 39312 B 124$^{+24}_{-20}$ 0.09 ± 0.02 −0.32 ± 0.02          
LSPM J1627+3328 38.0$_{-5.4}^{+6.3}$c −0.171 ± 0.008f −0.014 ± 0.008 3.29 −1.64 3.67 9.0 341
LSPM J1627+3328 49.9$^{+9.7}_{-8.1}$ −0.140 ± 0.005 −0.030 ± 0.005          
NLTT 44368 55.0$_{-11.3}^{+12.7}$d −0.056 ± 0.008f 0.215 ± 0.008 0.33 −0.37 0.49 90.2 7760
NLTT 44368 B 35.3$^{+6.9}_{-5.8}$b −0.053 ± 0.006 0.211 ± 0.006          
LSPM J1717+5925 108$_{-26}^{+35}$d −0.085 ± 0.008i −0.143 ± 0.008 1.8 1.6 2.4 14.4 1555
LSPM J1717+5925 B 119$^{+27}_{-22}$ −0.101 ± 0.004 −0.157 ± 0.004          
NLTT 52268 37.3$_{-8.7}^{+11.3}$a 0.16 ± 0.008 −0.089 ± 0.008f 0.5 0.2 0.6 14.7 549
NLTT 52268 B 55.6$^{+10.8}_{-9.1}$ 0.155 ± 0.006 −0.087 ± 0.006          
LSPM J2153+1157 36.2$_{-8.4}^{+10.9}$a −0.093 ± 0.008f −0.128 ± 0.008 0.8 0.8 1.2 11.3 408
LSPM J2153+1157 B 58.1$^{+11.4}_{-9.5}$ −0.085 ± 0.006 −0.136 ± 0.006          
PM I22118−1005 37.4$_{-7.7}^{+8.6}$d 0.028 ± 0.008g −0.25 ± 0.008 1.6 0.9 1.9 204.5 8892
PM I22118−1005 B 43.9$^{+8.8}_{-7.3}$ 0.05 ± 0.011 −0.262 ± 0.010          
NLTT 55219 44.7$_{-10.4}^{+13.5}$a 0.324 ± 0.008f 0.16 ± 0.008 0.9 3.1 3.2 9.7 432
NLTT 55219 B 40.0$^{+7.8}_{-6.5}$ 0.35 ± 0.03 0.26 ± 0.03          
Serendipitous Companion Discoveries
NLTT 730 21.7$_{-5.3}^{+8.1}$d 0.375 ± 0.008f −0.234 ± 0.008 0.5 1.58 1.66 233.6 5070
NLTT 730 B 23.7$^{+4.6}_{-3.9}$b 0.381 ± 0.009 −0.215 ± 0.009          
NLTT 27966 39.6$_{-10.2}^{+13.3}$a −0.153 ± 0.008f 0.182 ± 0.008 −0.79 0.42 0.89 15.9 630
NLTT 27966 B 42.3$^{+8.2}_{-6.9}$b −0.164 ± 0.011 0.188 ± 0.011          
LSPMJ1336+2541 60.7$_{-13.9}^{+15.7}$d −0.157 ± 0.008f 0.057 ± 0.008 2.1 2.8 3.5 121.7 8793
LSPM J1336+2541 B 63.2$^{+12.4}_{-10.3}$b −0.177 ± 0.005 0.031 ± 0.005          
HIP 73169 [27.3$_{-6.3}^{+8.3}$e] −0.267 ± 0.007 −0.076 ± 0.007 0.5 0.42 0.65 29.1 796
HIP 73169 B 50.7$^{+9.9}_{-8.3}$b −0.261 ± 0.009 −0.081 ± 0.009          
PM I23492+3458 30.7$_{-6.3}^{+7.1}$d −0.011 ± 0.008f −0.108 ± 0.008 1.0 1.0 1.4 34.9 949
PM I23492+3458 B 23.3$^{+4.5}_{-3.8}$b −0.002 ± 0.005 −0.099 ± 0.005          
Unlikely companions
NLTT 35593 63.0$_{-14.6}^{+19.1}$a −0.184 ± 0.005h −0.055 ± 0.005 1.76 −0.34 1.79 1105.8 69706
NLTT 35593 B 65.5$^{+12.8}_{-10.7}$b −0.162 ± 0.011 −0.059 ± 0.011          

Notes. nσ is the number of standard deviations the proper motions differ by. [...] Denotes distance from trigonometric parallax; all other distances are photometric. aPhotometric distance from Lépine (2005). bPhotometric distance from 2MASS magnitudes and Dupuy & Liu (2012). cPhotometric distance from Lépine & Gaidos (2011). dPhotometric distance from spectral type and spectrophotometric relations of Kraus & Hillenbrand (2007). eTrigonometric parallax from van Leeuwen (2007). fProper motion from Lépine & Shara (2005). gProper motion from Lépine & Gaidos (2011). hProper motion from Salim & Gould (2003). iProper motion from Hog et al. (2000).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

Table 6. The IR Data of Our Secondaries

Object Y J H K/Ks Source
(mag) (mag) (mag) (mag)
HIP search companions
HIP 2397 B ... 14.586 ± 0.038* 13.975 ± 0.048* >13.181* 2MASS
  ... 14.552 ± 0.012 13.912 ± 0.011 ... UKIRT
HIP 6217 B   15.441 ± 0.060* 14.731 ± 0.081* 14.423 ± 0.079* 2MASS
  ... ... ... 14.461 ± 0.009 UKIDSS
HIP 6407 B ... 15.471 ± 0.046 14.651 ± 0.061 14.402 ± 0.08 2MASS
  16.442 ± 0.008 15.345 ± 0.005 14.738 ± 0.006 14.203 ± 0.006 UKIDSS
HIP 9269 B ... 15.956 ± 0.088* 14.99 ± 0.096* 14.317 ± 0.085* 2MASS
  ... 16.126 ± 0.017 15.082 ± 0.014 14.298 ± 0.019 UKIRT
HIP 10033 B ... 13.761 ± 0.027 13.185 ± 0.031 12.929 ± 0.033 2MASS
  ... 13.746 ± 0.013 13.245 ± 0.011 ... UKIRT
HIP 11161 B ... 16.636 ± 0.161* 15.77 ± 0.173 15.392 ± 0.195* 2MASS
  ... 16.512 ± 0.019 15.862 ± 0.017 15.25 ± 0.028 UKIRT
HIP 13589 B ... 14.928 ± 0.034 14.275 ± 0.037 13.838 ± 0.046 2MASS
  ... 14.794 ± 0.034 14.226 ± 0.012 ... UKIRT
HIP 26653 B   14.756 ± 0.044* 13.91 ± 0.042* 13.322 ± 0.029* 2MASS
HIP 32728 B ... 14.508 ± 0.031 13.933 ± 0.038 13.509 ± 0.035 2MASS
HIP 37283 B ... 12.797 ± 0.027 12.234 ± 0.03 11.943 ± 0.024 2MASS
HIP 46984 B ... 13.285 ± 0.027* 12.745 ± 0.024 12.483 ± 0.027* 2MASS
  13.794 ± 0.002 13.215 ± 0.002 12.767 ± 0.002 12.463 ± 0.002 UKIDSS
HIP 49046 B ... 13.022 ± 0.022 12.418 ± 0.024 12.038 ± 0.021 2MASS
  ... 12.930 ± 0.092 ... ... UKIRT
HIP 51877 B   15.205 ± 0.063* 14.510 ± 0.062* 13.988 ± 0.052* 2MASS
HIP 52463 B ... 13.703 ± 0.024 13.117 ± 0.027 12.801 ± 0.031 2MASS
HIP 55666 B ... 12.674 ± 0.024 12.108 ± 0.024 11.746 ± 0.019 2MASS
  13.322 ± 0.002 12.581 ± 0.001 12.103 ± 0.003 11.762 ± 0.002 VISTA
HIP 58918 B ... 14.471 ± 0.03* 13.899 ± 0.044 13.524 ± 0.023 2MASS
HIP 59310 B ... 13.691 ± 0.027 13.052 ± 0.033 12.692 ± 0.024 2MASS
HIP 59933 B ... 16.101 ± 0.088* 15.162 ± 0.075* 14.616 ± 0.084 2MASS
  17.126 ± 0.015 15.995 ± 0.008 15.218 ± 0.009 14.62 ± 0.01 UKIDSS
HIP 60501 B ... 11.378 ± 0.027 10.792 ± 0.024 10.453 ± 0.023 2MASS
  11.916 ± 0.001 11.309 ± 0.001 10.979 ± 0.001 10.554 ± 0.001 UKIDSS
HIP 60987 B ... ... ... 10.869 ± 0.001 VISTA†
HIP 60987 C ... 11.402 ± 0.028* 10.81 ± 0.029 10.592 ± 0.024 2MASS
  11.782 ± 0.001 11.267 ± 0.001 10.7497 ± 0.001 10.488 ± 0.001 VISTA
HIP 63506 C ... 15.15 ± 0.042 14.426 ± 0.045 14.006 ± 0.047 2MASS
HIP 65706 B ... 13.315 ± 0.022 12.642 ± 0.026 12.297 ± 0.024 2MASS
  14.011 ± 0.002 13.246 ± 0.001 12.693 ± 0.001 12.258 ± 0.002 UKIDSS
HIP 65780 C ... >12.717 >12.197 12.007 ± 0.034* 2MASS
  13.580 ± 0.002 12.937 ± 0.001 12.404 ± 0.002 12.044 ± 0.002 UKIDSS
HIP 70623 C ... 12.191 ± 0.026 11.506 ± 0.023 11.224 ± 0.019 2MASS
  ... 12.039 ± 0.001 11.541 ± 0.001 11.233 ± 0.001 VISTA
HIP 75310 B ... 13.291 ± 0.032* 12.724 ± 0.03 12.51 ± 0.027 2MASS
HIP 76456 B ... 13.300 ± 0.031* 12.762 ± 0.028* 12.43 ± 0.029* 2MASS
  13.973 ± 0.002 13.240 ± 0.002 12.809 ± 0.002 12.397 ± 0.002 UKIDSS
HIP 76641 B ... 10.817 ± 0.018 10.176 ± 0.016 9.919 ± 0.014 2MASS
HIP 78184 B ... 14.32 ± 0.031 13.607 ± 0.035 13.122 ± 0.03 2MASS
  ... 14.252 ± 0.022 13.615 ± 0.037 13.091 ± 0.028 UKIRT
HIP 78859 B ... 12.258 ± 0.021 11.694 ± 0.02 11.496 ± 0.02 2MASS
  ... 12.214 ± 0.010 11.734 ± 0.010 ... UKIRT
HIP 78916 B ... 15.227 ± 0.043* 14.542 ± 0.045 14.193 ± 0.053 2MASS
  ... 15.148 ± 0.0179 14.603 ± 0.028 ... UKIRT
HIP 78923 B ... 14.052 ± 0.048* 13.566 ± 0.051* 13.28 ± 0.041* 2MASS
  ... 14.136 ± 0.011 13.621 ± 0.11 ... UKIRT
HIP 79180 B ... 13.941 ± 0.022 13.361 ± 0.027 12.965 ± 0.033 2MASS
HIP 80258 B ... 13.113 ± 0.021 12.556 ± 0.023 12.28 ± 0.021 2MASS
  ... 13.101 ± 0.016 12.562 ± 0.010 ... UKIRT
HIP 81910 B ... 12.44 ± 0.024* 11.887 ± 0.026 11.526 ± 0.025 2MASS
  ... 12.400 ± 0.010 11.858 ± 0.010 ... UKIRT
HIP 82233 B ... 11.889 ± 0.024 11.288 ± 0.021 11.043 ± 0.023 2MASS
  ... 11.874 ± 0.011 11.366 ± 0.010 ... UKIRT
HIP 83651 B ... 10.599 ± 0.024 10.057 ± 0.024 9.771 ± 0.021 2MASS
  ... 10.734 ± 0.010 10.877 ± 0.011 ... UKIRT
HIP 84840 B ... 12.508 ± 0.022 11.901 ± 0.023 11.685 ± 0.018 2MASS
  ... 12.491 ± 0.019 11.950 ± 0.010 ... UKIRT
HIP 85365 B ... 16.693 ± 0.168* 15.471 ± 0.118 >14.664 2MASS
  ... 16.184 ± 0.010 ... 14.718 ± 0.010 VISTA
HIP 86722 B ... 11.511 ± 0.025 11.016 ± 0.021 10.7 ± 0.019 2MASS
  ... 11.506 ± 0.015 11.089 ± 0.01 ... UKIRT
HIP 88728 B ... 10.269 ± 0.097* 10.043 ± 0.047* 9.876 ± 0.057* 2MASS
  ... 11.103 ± 0.019 10.965 ± 0.018 10.953 ± 0.027 UKIRT
HIP 90273 B ... 11.56 ± 0.022 11.019 ± 0.022 10.731 ± 0.018 2MASS
  ... 11.495 ± 0.010 11.012 ± 0.018 ... UKIRT
HIP 90869 B ... 11.101 ± 0.029* 10.569 ± 0.027 10.358 ± 0.023 2MASS
  ... 11.071 ± 0.10 10.818 ± 0.010 ... UKIRT
HIP 93967 B ... 13.357 ± 0.03 12.74 ± 0.025 12.525 ± 0.019 2MASS
  ... 13.24 ± 0.02 12.751 ± 0.02 ... UKIRT
HIP 97168 B ... 13.679 ± 0.027* 13.212 ± 0.026* 13.012 ± 0.033* 2MASS
  ... 13.784 ± 0.014 13.332 ± 0.014 ... UKIRT
HIP 98535 C ... 13.252 ± 0.031 12.724 ± 0.031 12.445 ± 0.032 2MASS
  ... 13.223 ± 0.010 12.752 ± 0.010 ... UKIRT
HIP 102582 B ... 11.963 ± 0.033* 11.494 ± 0.034 11.232 ± 0.032* 2MASS
  ... 11.972 ± 0.015 11.551 ± 0.010 ... UKIRT
HIP 103199 B ... 11.817 ± 0.027* 11.229 ± 0.024* 10.997 ± 0.019* 2MASS
  12.378 ± 0.014 11.850 ± 0.18 11.307 ± 0.010 11.250 ± 0.010 UKIRT
HIP 105202 B ... 12.124 ± 0.024 11.53 ± 0.022 11.246 ± 0.023 2MASS
  ... 12.0337 ± 0.010 11.571 ± 0.014 ... UKIRT
HIP 106551 B ... 13.224 ± 0.025* 12.606 ± 0.03 12.287 ± 0.022 2MASS
  ... 13.211 ± 0.010 12.630 ± 0.010 ... UKIRT
HIP 108822 B ... 10.622 ± 0.022 10.051 ± 0.021 9.821 ± 0.02 2MASS
  ... 10.805 ± 0.020 10.650 ± 0.010 ... UKIRT
HIP 109454 B ... 12.422 ± 0.026* 11.863 ± 0.032 11.62 ± 0.02 2MASS
  ... 12.452 ± 0.01 11.904 ± 0.017 ... UKIRT
HIP 111657 B ... 10.587 ± 0.032* 10.028 ± 0.034* 9.73 ± 0.027* 2MASS
  ... 10.583 ± 0.010 10.545 ± 0.016 ... UKIRT
HIP 112422 B ... 16.023 ± 0.113* 15.111 ± 0.103* 14.651 ± 0.093* 2MASS
  17.171 ± 0.022 16.016 ± 0.017 15.251 ± 0.015 ... UKIRT
HIP 114424 B ... 11.595 ± 0.026 10.976 ± 0.022 10.663 ± 0.022 2MASS
  ... 11.483 ± 0.010 11.185 ± 0.010 ... UKIRT
HIP 114456 B ... 10.844 ± 0.021* 10.227 ± 0.028* 9.896 ± 0.024* 2MASS
  ... 10.840 ± 0.014 10.446 ± 0.010 ... UKIRT
HIP 115819 B ... 15.095 ± 0.034 14.357 ± 0.029 13.974 ± 0.045 2MASS
  15.844 ± 0.007 14.965 ± 0.005 14.370 ± 0.004 13.907 ± 0.005 UKIDSS
HIP 116052 B ... 12.361 ± 0.019 11.79 ± 0.024 11.512 ± 0.025 2MASS
  ... 12.332 ± 0.019 11.793 ± 0.010 ... UKIRT
Companions to faint non-HIP primaries
NLTT 1011 ... 15.544 ± 0.059 14.928 ± 0.069 14.318 ± 0.066 2MASS
GD 280 B   16.034 ± 0.082 14.993 ± 0.09 14.547 ± 0.08 2MASS
NLTT 8245 B   14.922 ± 0.052* 14.221 ± 0.068* 13.812 ± 0.056* 2MASS
LSPM J0241+2553 B   17.027 ± 0.180 16.028 ± 0.180 15.331 ± 0.149 2MASS
HD 253662 B   15.961 ± 0.082* 15.182 ± 0.087* 14.506 ± 0.095* 2MASS
  16.511 ± 0.009 15.653 ± 0.007 ... ... UKIDSS
LSPM J0632+5053 B ... 16.383 ± 0.108 15.421 ± 0.133 15.171 ± 0.122 2MASS
  ... 16.612 ± 0.027 15.864 ± 0.022 ... UKIRT
NLTT 18587 B   16.894 ± 0.199 15.921 ± 0.215 >15.221 2MASS‡
NLTT 19109 B   16.933 ± 0.17* 15.89 ± 0.169* 15.463 ± 0.21* 2MASS
  ... 16.512 ± 0.017 ... 15.679 ± 0.026 VISTA
NLTT 22073 B ... 14.671 ± 0.037 14.070 ± 0.044 13.696 ± 0.049 2MASS
NLTT 23716 B   14.300 ± 0.036* 13.716 ± 0.035* 13.348 ± 0.028* 2MASS
  15.085 ± 0.005 14.225 ± 0.003 13.713 ± 0.004 13.309 ± 0.005 VISTA
NLTT 26746 B ... 16.403 ± 0.118* 15.224 ± 0.092 14.555 ± 0.105 2MASS
  17.377 ± 0.015 16.056 ± 0.008 15.295 ± 0.0090 14.61 ± 0.008 UKIDSS
NLTT 29395 B   15.81 ± 0.08* 15.133 ± 0.076* 14.781 ± 0.091* 2MASS
NLTT 30510 B   15.971 ± 0.08* 15.267 ± 0.095 14.854 ± 0.09 2MASS
NLTT 31450 B ... 16.135 ± 0.105* 15.048 ± 0.095* 14.331 ± 0.092* 2MASS
  ... 16.004 ± 0.21 15.081 ± 0.023 ... UKIRT
PMI 13410+0542 B ... 16.187 ± 0.143* 15.128 ± 0.131* 14.799 ± 0.138* 2MASS
  17.349 ± 0.017 16.125 ± 0.009 15.358 ± 0.008 14.727 ± 0.008 UKIDSS
PMI 13518+4157 B ... 15.081 ± 0.032 14.352 ± 0.049 13.851 ± 0.04 2MASS
NLTT 38489 B ... 16.64 ± 0.143* 15.789 ± 0.176* 15.481 ± 0.154* 2MASS
  ... 16.717 ± 0.031 16.147 ± 0.037 ... UKIRT
NLTT 39312 B ... 16.09 ± 0.096* 15.573 ± 0.118* >13.601 2MASS
  ... 16.277 ± 0.035 16.006 ± 0.045 ... UKIRT
LSPM J1627+3328 B ... 14.362 ± 0.083* 13.742 ± 0.066* 13.417 ± 0.055* 2MASS
  ... 14.730 ± 0.012 14.052 ± 0.011 ... UKIRT
NLTT 44368 B ... 14.736 ± 0.058 13.907 ± 0.064 13.467 ± 0.049* 2MASS
  ... 14.637 ± 0.013 13.993 ± 0.012 ... UKIRT
LSPM J1717+5925 B ... 16.580 ± 0.168* 15.934 ± 0.174* 15.581 ± 0.255* 2MASS
  ... 16.509 ± 0.018 ... ... UHS
NLTT 52268 B ... 14.945 ± 0.052* 14.29 ± 0.05 13.839 ± 0.05 2MASS
  ... 14.950 ± 0.02 14.295 ± 0.015 ... UKIRT
LSPM J2153+1157 B ... 14.403 ± 0.038* 13.785 ± 0.044* 13.427 ± 0.045* 2MASS
  ... 14.450 ± 0.011 13.834 ± 0.011 13.368 ± 0.011 UKIRT
PM I22118−1005 B ... 15.246 ± 0.049 14.69 ± 0.063 14.051 ± 0.052 2MASS
NLTT 55219 B ... 16.313 ± 0.122* 15.469 ± 0.137* 14.778 ± 0.145* 2MASS
  ... 16.612 ± 0.028 15.769 ± 0.024 ... UKIRT
Serendipitous Companion Discoveries
NLTT 730 B ... 16.16 ± 0.08 15.23 ± 0.08 14.48 ± 0.07 2MASS
  ... 16.16 ± 0.03 15.22 ± 0.03 ... UKIRT
NLTT 27966 B ... 16.155 ± 0.103 15.27 ± 0.11 14.58 ± 0.082 2MASS
  17.308 ± 0.044 16.106 ± 0.019 15.283 ± 0.018 ... UKIRT
LSPM J1336+2541 B ... 16.863 ± 0.16 16.017 ± 0.172 15.713 ± 0.2 2MASS
  18.228 ± 0.033 16.935 ± 0.017 16.122 ± 0.018 15.478 ± 0.016 UKIDSS
HIP 73169 B ... 16.007 ± 0.09* 15.047 ± 0.083 14.36 ± 0.081 2MASS
  17.223 ± 0.033 15.929 ± 0.02 15.054 ± 0.015 14.446 ± 0.016 VISTA
PM I23492+3458 B ... 16.298 ± 0.105 15.45 ± 0.112 15.008 ± 0.127 2MASS
  ... 16.387 ± 0.029 15.472 ± 0.021 ... UKIRT
Unlikely companions
NLTT 35593 B ... 16.299 ± 0.114 15.408 ± 0.117 14.737 ± 0.098 2MASS
  17.468 ± 0.02 16.227 ± 0.01 15.469 ± 0.011 14.876 ± 0.011 VISTA

Notes. † Object saturated in VISTA data. * Object has a confusion flag (ccflag) set in this filter. ‡ Photometry from the 2MASS reject table.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2 3

Table 7. The WISE Data of Our Companions

Object W1 W2 W3 W4 Note
(mag) (mag) (mag) (mag)
HIP search companions
HIP 2397 B 13.077 ± 0.026 12.818 ± 0.027 12.167 8.924 ± 0.409  
HIP 6217 B 14.154 ± 0.03* 13.836 ± 0.042* >12.790 >8.943  
HIP 6407 B 13.91 ± 0.027* 13.584 ± 0.035* >12.375 >9.305  
HIP 9269 B 13.486 ± 0.026* 13.265 ± 0.033* >12.573* 9.119 ± 0.473  
HIP 10033 B 12.597 ± 0.023* 12.33 ± 0.023* 12.578 ± 0.337* >9.229  
HIP 11161 B 15.173 ± 0.043* 15.274 ± 0.111* >12.738* >9.179  
HIP 13589 B 13.572 ± 0.026* 13.295 ± 0.035* >12.558* >9.002  
HIP 26653 B ... ... ... ...  
HIP 32728 B 13.326 ± 0027 13.133 ± 0.033 >12.04 >9.08  
HIP 37283 B 11.631 ± 0.024* 11.425 ± 0.021* 11.101 ± 0.105 9.329  
HIP 46984 B 12.313 ± 0.025* 12.129 ± 0.024* 12.3 ± 0.4 >8.6  
HIP 49046 B 11.777 ± 0.025 11.582 ± 0.023 11.424 ± 0.145 8.916  
HIP 51877 B ... ... ... ...  
HIP 52463 B 12.595 ± 0.025* 12.44 ± 0.025* 12.1 ± 0.3 >8.9  
HIP 55666 B 11.525 ± 0.023* 11.289 ± 0.023* 11.463 ± 0.176 9.097  
HIP 58918 B 13.252 ± 0.025* 12.954 ± 0.029* >12.284 >9.101  
HIP 59310 B 12.400 ± 0.024 12.198 ± 0.024* 12.232 ± 0.310 >8.855  
HIP 59933 B 14.271 ± 0.031* 13.939 ± 0.048* >12.707 >8.876  
HIP 60501 B 10.281 ± 0.023 10.12 ± 0.022* 10.038 ± 0.067 8.39 ± 0.325  
HIP 60987 B ... ... ... ...
HIP 60987 C 10.434 ± 0.022* 10.279 ± 0.019* 10.167 ± 0.066>8.887    
HIP 63506 C 13.696 ± 0.027 13.405 ± 0.031 >12.498 >9.324  
HIP 65706 B 12.007 ± 0.024* 11.799 ± 0.023* 11.697 ± 0.162 >9.243  
HIP 65780 C ... ... ... ...
HIP 70623 C 11.06 ± 0.022* 10.921 ± 0.021* 10.851 ± 0.084 >8.628  
HIP 75310 B 12.181 ± 0.025* 11.984 ± 0.024* 11.342 ± 0.178 >8.493  
HIP 76456 B 12.139 ± 0.023* 11.867 ± 0.022* 11.525 ± 0.100* >8.974  
HIP 76641 B 9.776 ± 0.023* 9.676 ± 0.021* 9.5590.024 9.362 ± 0.360  
HIP 78184 B 12.8 ± 0.023 12.516 ± 0.022 12.403 ± 0.153 >9.755  
HIP 78859 B 11.285 ± 0.022* 11.086 ± 0.021* 11.038 ± 0.059 >9.703  
HIP 78916 B ... ... ... ...
HIP 78923 B ... ... ... ...
HIP 79180 B 12.746 ± 0.023* 12.558 ± 0.022* 12.241 ± 0.157 >9.305  
HIP 80258 B 12.078 ± 0.024 11.884 ± 0.024* 12.218 ± 0.248 >9.435  
HIP 81910 B 11.143 ± 0.025* 11.011 ± 0.025* 10.793 ± 0.147* >8.691  
HIP 82233 B 10.855 ± 0.023* 10.661 ± 0.02* 10.588 ± 0.092 >8.774  
HIP 83651 B 9.631 ± 0.024* 9.495 ± 0.021* 9.387 ± 0.033 9.004 ± 0.428  
HIP 84840 B 11.45 ± 0.023* 11.294 ± 0.021* 11.376 ± 0.105* >9.348  
HIP 85365 B 13.875 ± 0.03 13.643 ± 0.044 >12.394 >9.059  
HIP 86722 B 10.517 ± 0.024* 10.253 ± 0.022* 9.908 ± 0.041* 9.376 ± 0.54  
HIP 88728 B ... ... ... ...  
HIP 90273 B 10.523 ± 0.023* 10.361 ± 0.021* 10.208 ± 0.048 9.386 ± 0.513  
HIP 90869 B 10.148 ± 0.022* 10.012 ± 0.020* 10.089 ± 0.064 8.217 ± 0.288  
HIP 93967 B 12.331 ± 0.023* 12.137 ± 0.026 >11.605 >8.52  
HIP 97168 B ... ... ... ...
HIP 98535 C 12.14 ± 0.023* 11.917 ± 0.021* 12.603 ± 0.321 >9.516  
HIP 102582 B 11.059 ± 0.025* 10.795 ± 0.026* 10.771 ± 0.096 >9.105  
HIP 103199 B 10.855 ± 0.056* 10.644 ± 0.041* 10.61 ± 0.107 >9.209  
HIP 105202 B 11.046 ± 0.024* 10.865 ± 0.021* 10.583 ± 0.08 >9.01  
HIP 106551 B ... ... ... ...
HIP 108822 B 9.708 ± 0.024* 9.564 ± 0.020* 9.461 ± 0.032 8.63 ± 0.276  
HIP 109454 B 11.5 ± 0.025* 11.233 ± 0.022* 11.171 ± 0.111 >9.279  
HIP 111657 B 9.566 ± 0.050* 9.371 ± 0.038* 9.259 ± 0.05 8.819 ± 0.517  
HIP 112422 B ... ... ... ...
HIP 114424 B 10.418 ± 0.023* 10.213 ± 0.020* 10.154 ± 0.062 >8.394  
HIP 114456 B 9.685 ± 0.023* 9.511 ± 0.020* 9.299 ± 0.025* 8.744 ± 0.242  
HIP 115819 B 13.511 ± 0.026* 13.184 ± 0.033* 12.42 ± 0.467 8.425 ± 0.313  
HIP 116052 B 11.324 ± 0.025* 11.135 ± 0.023* 10.925 ± 0.091 >9.236  
Companions to faint non-HIP primaries
NLTT 1011 13.762 ± 0.026 13.414 ± 0.032* >12.3 >8.7  
GD 280 B 14.396 ± 0.032 14.149 ± 0.052 >12.794 >9.206  
NLTT 8245 B ... ... ... ...
LSPM J0241+2553 B 14.994 ± 0.044 14.826 ± 0.093 12.301 ± 0.396 >8.97  
HD 253662 B ... ... ... ...  
LSPM J0632+5053 B 14.94 ± 0.038* 14.757 ± 0.078 >12.814 >9.183  
NLTT 18587 B 15.096 ± 0.043 14.828 ± 0.085 >12.008 >9.129  
NLTT 19109 B ... ... ... ...
NLTT 22073 B 13.295 ± 0.027* 13.000 ± 0.030* >12.224 >8.756  
NLTT 23716 B ... ... ... ...
NLTT 26746 B 14.058 ± 0.029* 13.871 ± 0.045 >12.715 >8.755  
NLTT 29395 B ... ... ... ...
NLTT 30510 B 14.546 ± 0.032* 14.247 ± 0.051* >12.617 >8.982  
NLTT 31450 B ... ... ... ...
PM I13410+0542 ... ... ... ...
PM I13518+4157 13.556 ± 0.026* 13.222 ± 0.029 12.46 ± 0.31 >9.328  
NLTT 38489 B ... ... ... ...
NLTT 39312 B ... ... ... ...
LSPM J1627+3328 B ... ... ... ...
NLTT 44368 B 12.951 ± 0.026 12.692 ± 0.025 12.054 ± 0.15 >8.934  
LSPM J1717+5925 B ... ... ... ...
NLTT 52268 B ... ... ... ...
LSPM J2153+1157 B ... ... ... ...
PM I22118−1005 B 13.571 ± 0.027 13.335 ± 0.036 >11.969 >8.984  
NLTT 55219 B ... ... ... ...
Serendipitous Companion Discoveries
NLTT 730 B 13.69 ± 0.03 13.38 ± 0.04 11.7 ± 0.2 >9.011  
NLTT 27966 B 14.204 ± 0.028 13.853 ± 0.042 >12.773 >9.18  
LSPM J1336+2541 B 14.844 ± 0.034 14.553 ± 0.06 >12.869 >8.916  
HIP 73169 B 13.988 ± 0.027* 13.678 ± 0.035* 12.692 ± 0.409 >9.423  
PM I23492+3458 B 14.036 ± 0.028* 13.396 ± 0.032* 12.311 ± 0.305 >8.985  
Unlikely companions
NLTT 35593 B 14.44 ± 0.03 14.287 ± 0.052 >12.517 >9.277  

Notes. * Has contaminated photometry in at least one WISE band. † Too close to their primary to have an independent photometry measurement in WISE.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

Table 8. Log of Spectroscopic Observations

Object Date tint Conditions Seeing Slit Mode Resolution Airmass Standard
(UT) (s) ('') ('') λ/Δλ
HIP search companions
HIP 2397 B 2012 Jul 5 360 cloudy 1.5 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.12 HD 222749
HIP 6217 B 2013 Dec 11 360 cloudy 1.3 0.5 × 15 prism 120 1.30 HD 13936
HIP 6407 B 2012 Jul 6 480 clear 1.3 0.3 × 15 prism 200 1.37 HD 219545
HIP 9269 B 2011 Dec 2 1440 thin clouds 0.4 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.156 HD 23452
HIP 10033 B 2012 Oct 25 720 cloudy 0.5 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.14 HD 13936
HIP 11161 B 2012 Oct 28 720 thin clouds 0.8 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.202 HD 21038
HIP 13589 B 2012 Jul 8 480 clear >1 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.44 HD 19600
HIP 26653 B 2014 Jan 18 120 clear 0.6 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.34 HD 32090
HIP 32728 B 2013 Apr 3 360 clear 0.7 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.05 HD 56386
HIP 37283 B 2012 Nov 16 240 thin clouds 0.4 0.8 × 15 SXD 750 1.18 HD 63586
HIP 46984 B 2013 Apr 5 480 clouds 0.5 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.21 HD 101369
HIP 49046 B 2012 Nov 16 360 thin clouds 0.6 0.8 × 15 SXD 750 1.04 HD 89239
HIP 51877 B 2014 Jan 17 180 clear 0.5 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.10 HD 71906
HIP 52463 B 2013 Apr 3 360 clear 0.7 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.28 HD 90606
HIP 55666 B 2011 Apr 20 80 clear 0.5 0.5 × 15 prism 120 1.509 HD 97585
HIP 58918 B 2013 Apr 16 360 clouds 0.5 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.14 HD 105388
HIP 59310 B 2013 Apr 16 360 clouds 0.5 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.04 HD 105388
HIP 59933 B 2011 Mar 31 480 clear 0.3 0.5 × 15 prism 120 1.08 HD 10538
HIP 60501 B 2011 Apr 20 80 clear 0.5 0.5 × 15 prism 120 1.208 HD 109309
HIP 60987 B 2013 Apr 16 360 cloudy 0.4 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.14 HD 101060
HIP 60987 C 2013 Apr 16 360 cloudy 0.4 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.16 HD 101060
HIP 63506 C 2013 Jan 26 360 clear 0.7 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.083 HD 109615
HIP 65706 B 2012 Apr 30 180 fog 1.5 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.4 HD 116960
HIP 65780 C 2013 Jul 14 180 clear 0.9 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.73 HD 116960
HIP 70623 C 2012 Jul 7 720 clear 0.5 0.5 × 15 SXD 1200 1.11 HD 132072
HIP 75310 B 2013 Apr 17 720 clear 0.7 0.8 × 15 SXD 750 1.30 HD 144425
HIP 76456 B 2013 Apr 5 120 cloudy 0.8 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.26 HD 40739
HIP 76641 B 2013 Apr 3 90 clear 0.9 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.3 HD 136831
HIP 78184 B 2011 Mar 31 160 clear 0.3 0.5 × 15 prism 120 1.37 HD 145127
HIP 78859 B 2012 Aug 10 180 clear 0.5 0.5 × 15 SXD 1200 1.40 q Her
HIP 78916 B 2013 Jul 13 180 clear 0.5 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.07 HD 165029
HIP 78923 B 2013 Jul 13 180 clear 0.5 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.14 HD 145647
HIP 79180 B 2013 Apr 3 360 clear 0.9 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.44 HD 172728
HIP 80258 B 2012 Aug 10 50 thin clouds 0.4 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.2 26 Ser
HIP 81910 B 2011 Apr 20 80 clear 0.5 0.5 × 15 prism 120 1.485 HD 145127
HIP 82233 B 2011 Apr 20 80 clear 0.5 0.5 × 15 prism 120 1.276 HD 148968
HIP 83651 B 2012 Jul 11 100 thin clouds 0.9 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.1 HD 159008
HIP 85365 B 2012 Jul 7 600 clear 0.5 0.8 × 15 SXD 750 1.25 HD 159415
HIP 86722 B 2011 Apr 20 80 clear 0.5 0.5 × 15 prism 120 1.006 HD 165029
HIP 88728 B 2012 Jul 6 20 clear 1.3 0.3 × 15 prism 200 1.23 HD 165029
HIP 90273 B 2013 Nov 8 200 cloudy 1.3 0.3 × 15 prism 200 1.17 HD 174567
HIP 90869 B 2012 Aug 10 80 clear 0.3 0.5 × 15 SXD 1200 1.51 HD 184533
HIP 93967 B 2011 Oct 14 300 cloudy 1.0 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.28 HD 182678
HIP 97168 B 2012 Jul 6 40 clear 1.3 0.3 × 15 prism 200 1.15 HD 199217
HIP 98535 C 2012 Jul 6 120 clear 1.3 0.3 × 15 prism 200 1.14 HD 199217
HIP 102582 B 2013 Jul 13 60 clear 0.5 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.08 HD 192538
HIP 103199 B 2012 Jul 6 120 clear 1.3 0.3 × 15 prism 200 1.046 HD 210501
HIP 105202 B 2012 Jul 6 150 clear 1.3 0.3 × 15 prism 200 1.043 HD 210501
HIP 106551 B 2012 Aug 11 240 clear 0.7 0.5 × 15 prism 120 1.245 HD199312
HIP 108822 B 2012 Aug 11 80 clear 0.7 0.5 × 15 prism 120 1.247 HD 210501
HIP 109454 B 2011 Oct 15 1440 clear 0.6 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.04 HD 210501
HIP 111657 B 2012 Oct 2 240 cloudy 0.8 0.8 × 15 SXD 750 1.19 HD 210501
HIP 112422 B 2012 Oct 7 540 thin cloud 0.9 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.03 HD 210501
HIP 114424 B 2012 Jul 7 140 clear 0.5 0.5 × 15 prism 120 1.163 HD 218639
HIP 114456 B 2012 Oct 2 90 cloudy 0.7 0.8 × 15 SXD 750 1.24 HD 219290
HIP 115819 B 2012 Jul 6 240 clear 1.3 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.198 HD 203769
HIP 116052 B 2012 Oct 25 420 cloudy 0.6 0.8 × 15 SXD 750 1.01 HD 210501
Non-Hipparcos Companions
NLTT 1011 B 2013 Sep 23 720 clear 0.6 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.04 HD 210501
GD 280 B 2013 Dec 11 720 cloudy 1.2 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.30 HD 15090
NLTT 8245 B 2014 Jan 19 180 clear 0.7 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.51 HD 10897
LSPM J0241+2553 B 2014 Jan 18 960 clear 0.6 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.22 HD 22401
HD 253662 B 2014 Jan 18 360 clear 0.6 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.13 HD 43583
LSPM J0632+5053 B 2013 Apr 4 480 clear 0.7 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.30 HD 248790
NLTT 18587 B 2014 Jan 19 960 clear 0.7 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.07 HD 58296
NLTT 19109 B 2014 Jan 18 240 clear 0.6 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.35 HD 73687
NLTT 22073 B 2013 Nov 23 160 clear 1.1 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.49 HD 87727
NLTT 23716 B 2014 Jan 19 80 clear 0.7 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.12 HD 79108
NLTT 26746 B 2011 Mar 31 480 clear 0.3 0.5 × 15 prism 120 1.05 HD 105388
NLTT 29395 B 2014 Jan 19 360 clear 0.7 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.28 HD 128039
NLTT 30510 B 2014 Jan 19 240 clear 0.7 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.05 HD 109615
NLTT 31450 B 2011 Mar 31 480 clear 0.3 0.5 × 15 prism 120 1.03 HD 105388
PMI 13410+0542 B 2013 Jul 13 360 clear 0.9 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.12 HD 116960
PMI 13518+4157 B 2013 Jul 13 360 clear 0.9 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.14 HD 116960
NLTT 38489 B 2013 Apr 18 720 clear 0.5 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.45 HD 143187
NLTT 39312 B 2013 Jul 13 360 clear 0.9 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.18 HD 136831
LSPM J1627+3328 B 2013 Apr 17 360 cloudy 0.7 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.12 HD 145647
NLTT 44368 B 2013 Apr 16 360 thin clouds 0.7 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.27 HD 199217
LSPM J1717+5925 B 2013 Jul 12 1200 clear 1.0 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.45 HD 179933
NLTT 52268 B 2013 Jul 12 120 clear 0.8 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.08 HD 210501
LSPM J2153+1157 B 2013 Jul 12 180 clear 0.8 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.10 HD 210501
PM I22118−1005 B 2013 Jul 12 720 clear 0.8 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.18 HD 203769
NLTT 55219 B 2013 Jul 12 720 clear 0.8 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.04 HD 210501
Serendipitous Companion Discoveries
NLTT 27966 B 2012 Jun 7 360 clear 1.0 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.16 HD 99966
LSPM J1336+2541 B 2012 Jul 8 960 clear 0.9 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.06 HD 116960
HIP 73169 B 2012 Jul 6 960 clear 1.0 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.30 HD 116960
PM 23492+3458 B 2012 Jul 7 720 clear 0.6 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.31 HD 203030
Unlikely companions
NLTT 35593 B 2013 Apr 18 360 clear 0.5 0.8 × 15 prism 75 1.40 HD 116960
Primary Stars
NLTT 730 2013 Sep 23 180 clear 0.7 0.8 × 15 SXD 750 1.03 HD 210501
LSPMJ0632+5053 2013 Apr 17 90 patchy cloud 0.7 0.3 × 15 SXD 2000 1.24 HD 39250
NLTT 26746 2012 Jul 5 280 clear 1.2 0.3 × 15 SXD 2000 1.30 HD 99966
NLTT 27966 2012 Jul 5 720 clear 1.2 0.3 × 15 SXD 2000 1.56 HD 101060
NLTT 31450 2012 Jul 5 240 clear 0.8 0.3 × 15 SXD 2000 1.30 HD 118214
LSPMJ1336+2541 2013 Jul 12 90 clear 1.0 0.3 × 15 SXD 2000 1.10 HD 109691
PM I13518+4157 2013 Jul 12 90 clear 1.0 0.3 × 15 SXD 2000 1.06 HD 123233
HIP 83651 2013 Apr 17 90 cloudy 0.7 0.8 × 15 SXD 750 1.11 HD 167163
HIP 84840 2013 Apr 16 180 cloudy 0.8 0.3 × 15 SXD 2000 1.07 HD 165029
NLTT 44368 2013 Jul 12 90 clear 0.8 0.3 × 15 SXD 2000 1.32 HD 199217
HIP 97168 2013 Apr 17 90 cloudy 0.7 0.8 × 15 SXD 750 1.20 HD 197291
HIP 108822 2013 Jul 12 90 clear 1.0 0.3 × 15 SXD 2000 1.08 HD 210501
PM I22118−1005 2013 Jul 12 90 clear 1.0 0.3 × 15 SXD 2000 1.25 HD 203893
PM I23492+3458 2013 Jul 12 90 clear 1.0 0.3 × 15 SXD 2000 1.31 HD 219290

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

We performed spectral decomposition analysis on HIP 6407B using the method described in Section 5.2 of Dupuy & Liu (2012). Briefly, we started with all possible pairs of the 178 IRTF/SpeX prism spectra from the library of Burgasser et al. (2010). For each template pairing, we determined the scale factors needed to minimize the rms deviation from our observed spectrum. We then computed the χ2 of our Keck LGS AO flux ratios in J, H, and CH4s bands compared to the flux ratios computed for each pairing. We excluded pairings that significantly disagreed with our measured flux ratios, p2) < 0.05, and examined the remaining best pairings to determine the component spectral types. Our final spectral types of L1.0 ± 0.5 and T3 ± 1 account for the full range of spectral templates that gave equally good fits to our combined light spectrum. We estimated the flux ratio in the K band as well as flux ratios in the 2MASS photometric system by taking the mean and rms of each flux ratio among the ensemble of best-fit template pairings. Figure 15 shows the best match to our spectrum, which is provided by the templates.

The best match to our spectrum is provided by the templates DENIS-P J170548.3−051645 (L1; Burgasser et al. 2010; Allers & Liu 2013) and SDSS J120602.51+281328.7 (T3; Chiu et al. 2006; Burgasser et al. 2010) scaled to each other by the magnitudes shown in the lower panel of Figure 15, giving magnitude differences of dJ = 2.26 ± 0.05 mag and dH = 2.51 ± 0.05 mag. We adopt spectral types of L1 ± 1 and T3 ± 1 for the components of HIP 6407B based on the typical uncertainty in infrared types for L dwarfs and the range of good matching templates for the secondary. Note that the template library from Burgasser et al. (2010) nominally only includes objects later than L0, which barely encompasses the spectral type of the proposed primary component. However, Figure 15 shows that the L1 template gives a very good match to the data, so the primary is not likely to be of much earlier type.

5.2.2. HIP 70623 (HD 126614)

HIP 70623 (HD 126614) is a K0 star with an Msin i = 0.38 MJup giant planet in a 3.41 yr orbit (Howard et al. 2010). There is also an additional M dwarf component in the system with a separation of 0farcs5 (Howard et al. 2010) detected by adaptive optics imaging. The wide M5.5 companion we recover was identified by Gould & Chaname (2004) as a companion but has no previously published spectral type. Despite this object being identified as a companion before the Howard et al. (2010) identification of the closer companion, it has the designation HIP 70623/HD 126614 C.

5.2.3. HIP 115819 (VZ Piscium)

VZ Piscium is a marginal-contact eclipsing binary with a period of 0.261 days (Hrivnak et al. 1995) classified as a W-UMa type variable. As angular momentum transfer to additional components can tighten an inner binary and lead to contact, Rucinski et al. (2007) observed VZ Piscium as part of an adaptive optics search for companions to contact binaries. We have identified an M8 companion at a separation of 30''. This fell outside the 36'' × 36'' field of view of Rucinski et al. (2007). Note that Qian et al. (2004) suggest a closer companion to the binary may be causing a variation in the light curve with a period of ∼25 yr. However, no close companion was identified by Rucinski et al. (2007), and our companion is too wide to introduce such a short period variation.

5.2.4. HIP 103199 (HD 335289)

HIP 103199 (spectral type G5) is listed as runaway star by Tetzlaff et al. (2011). This is based on an estimated age of ∼46 ± 23 Myr and the star's space motion. Fujii & Portegies Zwart (2011) hypothesize that such objects are the result of a three-body interaction that results in the formation of a runaway star and a close binary. HIP 103199 has a wide (⩾646 AU) binary companion found by Lépine & Bongiorno 2007, which we classify as M3.5. We converted our UKIRT photometry to the CIT system using the conversions of Carpenter (2001) in order to calculate the properties of the companion using evolutionary models. Using the Hipparcos distance to the primary of 59.5$^{+5.1}_{-4.3}$ pc, we derive an absolute K-band magnitude of 7.42 ± 0.18 mag for the companion. Using the evolutionary models of Baraffe et al. (1998) and the spectral-type–effective temperature scale of Kenyon & Hartmann (1995), we derive K-band absolute magnitudes of 6.18 ± 0.25 mag at 50 Myr and 7.16 ± 0.17 mag at 300 Myr for an M3.5 where the quoted error is calculated from our half-subtype classification uncertainty. Based on this we suggest that the companion to HIP 103199 (HD 335289) is not overluminous due to youth, and it is likely that this system is not as young as suggested by Tetzlaff et al. (2011).

5.2.5. HIP 60987 B/C

During the spectroscopic observations of our companion to HIP 60987 (spectral type M3, separation 19''), we identified that the primary itself was a visual double. A spectrum of this other companion (spectral type K7, separation ∼5'') was also obtained. As both companions had previous listings in the Washington Double Star catalog, we used the previously existing designations for the companions.

5.2.6. NLTT 38489 A/B

The companion to NLTT 38489 stands out as having a photometric distance that is in particularly poor agreement with its primary. However, this object is only 6farcs7 away from its primary. Hence the photometry used to estimate the companion's photometric distance may be unreliable.

5.2.7. LSPM J0241+2553 A/B

We do not have a spectrum for LSPM J0241+2553 A. To characterize this object we examined its reduced proper motion diagram placement compared to Figure 4 of Limoges et al. (2013) and concluded that this object was likely a white dwarf.

Figure 3.

Figure 3. IRTF/SpeX spectra for our ultracool Hipparcos companions with spectral types of M7 or later. Spectra taken with SpeX SXD mode have been Gaussian smoothed to R = 200. Note that HIP 6407 B was resolved as being an L1+T3 binary itself. See Section 5.2.1 for details.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 4.

Figure 4. IRTF/SpeX spectra for our ultracool companions discovered serendipitously or by searching for wide companions to faint non-Hipparcos primaries.

Standard image High-resolution image

5.2.8. HD 253662 A/B

HD 253662 A is listed in SIMBAD as a G8 subgiant. We estimated this object's photometric distance using the same mechanism as for other photometric distances using the G8 spectral type, the object's 2MASS magnitudes, and the absolute magnitudes quoted in Kraus & Hillenbrand (2007). As this object is a subgiant and hence more luminous than the dwarfs used to calibrate the Kraus & Hillenbrand (2007) absolute magnitudes, we quote our 1σ lower error bound as a minimum distance.

5.2.9. The Possible Companion to NLTT 35593

The candidate companion to NLTT 35593 has a very similar photometric distance (65.8$\pm _{10.7}^{12.8}$ pc) to its primary (63.0$\pm _{14.6}^{19.1}$ pc). However, its wide separation (1106'') puts it in a region similar to that in Figure 9 that is populated by chance alignments. Hence we consider it unlikely to be a bona-fide companion. Radial velocity or parallax measurements will be required to assess whether it is a true binary.

Table 9. Spectroscopic Classification of Our L Dwarf Companions

Object SpT(Visual) H2O_J SpT(H2O_J) H2O_H SpT(H2O_H) CH4_K SpT(CH4_K) SpT(Final)
Type
HIP search companions
HIP 6407B L0 0.831 L3.3 0.776 L3.6 1.002 L4.3 L1+T5c
HIP 2397B L0 0.935 L0.6 0.846 L0.8 1.053 L2.3 L0.5
HIP 59933B L1.5 0.922 L0.9 0.838 L1.1 1.042 L2.8 L1
HIP 63506 C L1a 0.909 L1.2 0.82 L1.8 1.025 L3.5 L1
HIP 85365B L5 0.752 L5.7 0.701 L6.5 0.965 L5.6 L5.5
HIP 9269B L6 0.752 L5.7 0.781 L3.3 0.978 L5.2 L6
HIP 11161B L1.5 0.900 L1.4 0.834 L1.2 1.01 L4.0 L1.5
HIP 112422B L2 0.809 L4.0 0.837 L1.1 1.028 L3.3 L1.5
Companions to faint non-HIP primaries
NLTT 1011B L1.5 0.843 L2.9 0.763 L4.0 1.01 L4.2 L2
NLTT 55219Bb L2 0.793 L4.5 0.707 L6.3 0.943 L6.3 L5.5
PM I22118−1005 B L1.5 0.906 L1.3 0.806 L2.3 1.03 L3.1 L1.5
PM I13410+0542B L4 0.852 L2.7 0.734 L5.2 1.115 M9.3 L4
PM I13518+4157B L1.5 0.882 L1.8 0.829 L1.4 0.985 L4.9 L1.5
LSPM J0241+2553 B L1.5 0.922 L0.9 0.841 L0.9 1.064 L1.8 L1
HD 253662 B L1.5 0.942 L0.5 0.0866 L0.0 1.060 L2.0 L0.5
LSPM J0632+5053B L2 0.919 L1.0 0.846 L0.7 0.999 L4.4 L1.5
NLTT 26746B L4 0.786 L4.7 0.721 L5.7 1.031 L3.2 L4
NLTT 31450B L6 0.829 L3.4 0.784 L3.2 1.057 L2.1 L6
NLTT 44368B L1.5 0.899 L1.4 0.834 L1.2 1.038 L2.9 L1.5
LSPM J1717+5925 B L1.5 0.953 L0.3 0.850 L0.6 1.042 L2.8 L1
Serendipitous companion discoveries
NLTT 27966B L4 0.771 L5.1 0.718 L5.9 1.011 L4.0 L4
LSPM J1336+2541B L4 0.848 L2.8 0.718 L5.9 0.964 L5.6 L4
HIP 73169B L2.5 0.87 L2.2 0.787 L3.1 1.059 L2.0 L2.5
PM 23492+3458B L9 0.615 L9.7 0.63 L9.0 0.79 L9.7 L9
Unlikely discoveries
NLTT 35593B L2 0.878 L2.0 0.796 L2.8 1.049 L2.5 L2

Notes. aNo good standard comparison was found; the best match in the SpeX prism library was the L1 2MASSWJ143928.4+192915 (Burgasser et al. 2004). bNo good standard comparison was found; the best match in the SpeX prism library was the L5.5 2MASS J17502484–0016151 (Kendall et al. 2007). cUsing spectral decomposition we determined that HIP 6407B is likely itself a double consisting of an L1 and a T5. We later resolved this companion as a tight binary itself. See Section 5.2.1 for more details.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Table 10. Data on Our Hipparcos Stars

Object SpT RV Hp B − V [M/H]k [Fe/H]e Age vtan U V W
(km s−1) (mag) (mag) (dex) (dex) (Gyr) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1) (km s−1)
HIP 2397 K5a ... 9.34 0.93 ... ... 0.5–∼10y 42.2 ... ... ...
HIP 6217 K0a ... 9.116 0.754 ... ... 0.4–∼10y* 58.5 ... ... ...
HIP 6407 G5a ... 8.74 0.64 ... −0.084u 0.5–∼10y 44.9 ... ... ...
HIP 9269 G5a −35.3 ± 0.1d 7.29 0.77 0.15 ... 2.2–10.2k 50.7 −10.9 15.8 −57.5
HIP 10033 F8a −12.9f 7.24 0.5 ... −0.08 2.7–3.7e 34.3 −35.8 6.4 −4.4
HIP 11161 F5a −41.7f 8.03 0.42 ... −0.23 0.5–2.4e 33.2 −45.1 −17.8 −22.2
HIP 13589 F8a ... 8.8 0.66 ... ... 0.4–∼10y 61.0 ... ... ...
HIP 26653 G5q 12.51 ± 0.45r 7.987 0.764   −0.07 1.1–9.3e* 18.9 19.0 −9.1 −8.3
  ... ... ... ... −0.1 ... 1.6–13.8k        
HIP 32728 G0a ... 9.09 0.66 ... ... 0.3–∼10y 52.3 ... ... ...
HIP 37283 F5a 7.0f 7.0 0.47 ... −0.1 0.4–2.1e 21.7 17.0 −6.6 −13.7
HIP 46984 F8a ... 8.81 0.52 ... ... 0.4–∼10y 39.3 ... ... ...
HIP 49046 M0a ... 11.31 1.37 ... ... 0.3–∼10z 19.7 ... ... ...
HIP 51877 G5a −46.68 ± 0.25t 8.606 0.724 ... 0.22u 2.4–7.5s 17.7 −17.0 −32.1 −45.9
HIP 52463 G4a 12.9 ± 0.2f 8.82 0.64 ... 0.14 1.0–4.9e 38.4 37.4 −2.1 15.4
HIP 55666 F5a −29.3f 7.06 0.54 ... −0.08 3.6–5.1e 29.8 5.9 −3.9 −41.2
HIP 58918 K1a ... 10.79 1.02 ... ... 0.1–∼10y 78.7 ... ... ...
HIP 59310 K5a ... 10.19 1.1 ... ... 0.2–∼10y 34.1 ... ... ...
HIP 59933 F8a −3.4f 8.28 0.54 ... 0.03 0.3–2.5e 29.4 19.1 −20.7 −9.1
HIP 60501 M0a ... 10.72 1.58 ... ... 0.3–∼10z 36.1 ... ... ...
HIP 60987 F2a ... 7.45 0.43 ... −0.12 1.3–2.4e 37.4 ... ...  
HIP 63506 M0a ... 11.37 1.58 ... ... 0.3–∼10z 79.9 ... ... ...
HIP 65706 K7b ... 11.22 1.58 ... ... 0.3–∼10z 63.6 ... ...  
HIP 65780 K0a 8.64 0.82 ... ... ... 0.5–∼10y 80.0 ... ... ...
HIP 70623 K0l ... 8.96 0.81 0.46 ... 3.3–6.0k 73.0 ... ... ...
HIP 75310 G5a 17.3 ± 3.9f 8.52 0.64 ... −0.22 6.3–9.3e 49.5 −26.6 −43.2 −13.4
HIP 76456 F5a −15.7f 6.56 0.433 ... −0.25 0.4–2.2e 18.4 −21.3 11.0 3.0
HIP 76641 G5a ... 8.78 0.658 ... ... 0.4–∼10y 42.1 ... ... ...
HIP 78184 M0a ... 10.42 1.27 ... ... 0.3–∼10z 53.3 ... ... ...
HIP 78859 G0a ... 8.16 0.57 ... ... 0.7–∼10y 70.3 ... ... ...
HIP 78916 G0a ... 8.86 0.599 ... ... 0.4–∼10y 59.1 ... ... ...
HIP 78923 G5a 1.2 ± 0.2f 8.69 0.677 ... ... 0.4–4.0e 77.2 57.7 −20.5 46.9
HIP 79180 K7a −26.2 ± 0.5h 9.38 0.74 ... ... 0.3–∼10z 97.0 −99.3 −12.8 −8.1
HIP 80258 K3a ... 10.85 0.97 ... ... 0.1–∼10y 69.9 ... ... ...
HIP 81910 G2a 47.9f 6.86 0.67 0.16 0.19 4.0–5.8e 23.0 −46.7 −25.4 −0.5
  ... ... ... ... ... ... 3.2–5.0k        
HIP 82233 G2a 57.4f 7.55 0.57 ... −0.05 0.7–4.7e 23.9 −62.0 −2.2 −4.0
  ... ... ... ... ... ... 3.8–12.0w        
HIP 83651 K5m ... 10.6 1.21 ... ... 0.1–∼10y 47.5 ... ... ...
HIP 84840 G1.5m ... 10.0 0.80 ... ... 0.1–∼10y 20.3 ... ... ...
HIP 85365 F3a 0.4f 4.62 0.38 ... −0.09 1.6–1.9e* 14.6 −1.9 −12.0 8.1
HIP 86722 K0a 26.5f 7.64 0.75 ... −0.33 3.0–11.8e* 67.8 −68.1 −25.8 0.3
HIP 88728 F5a 16.2 ± 0.5 7.08 0.51 ... −0.1x 1.5–∼10y 29.6 −29.7 −6.32 −14.8
HIP 90273 K7b ... 11.87 1.51 ... ... 0.3–∼10z 67.5 ... ... ...
HIP 90869 G2a 31.0f 8.07 0.58 ... −0.46 5.3–10.8e 50.4 −38.9 −41.8 15.6
  ... ... ... ... ... ... 1.9–5.7k        
HIP 93967 F9a ... 9.74 0.61 ... ... 0.2–∼10y 180.5 ... ... ...
HIP 97168 G4m ... 10.51 0.88 ... ... 0.1–∼10y 85.9 ... ...  
HIP 98535 F5a −4.9f 8.16 0.77 ... −0.02 10.6–13.16e 42.0 −38.5 −12.0 12.9
HIP 102582 K2a 61.3 ± 9.8o 9.86 1.032 ... ... 0.2–∼10y 88.9 −74.9 −4.1 −77.6
HIP 103199 G5a ... 9.82 0.84 ... ... 0.2–∼10y 45.2 ... ... ...
HIP 105202 F5a −1.1f 7.38 0.49 ... −0.29 0.6–2.9e 29.6 15.9 −6.6 −24.2
HIP 106551 K3IIIa −68.1 ± 0.1i 5.04 1.09 ... ... ⩽10aa 50.3 −23.4 43.3 −39.9
HIP 108822 K7m ... 12.11 0.0 ... ... 0.3–∼10z 74.8 ... ... ...
HIP 109454 F5a 6.6f 8.05 0.41 ... −0.19 1.4–2.1e 54.7 −52.9 −1.8 −15.4
HIP 111657 K7c ... 10.69 1.27 ... ... 0.3–∼10z 61.6 ... ... ...
HIP 112422 K2a ... 10.33 0.94 ... ... 0.1–∼10y* 46.8 ... ... ...
HIP 114424 G0a 1.7f 7.45 0.6 0.06 0.08 0.6–4.5e 32.3 9.1 −25.3 −18.0
  ... ... ... ... ... ... 3.7–11.7k        
HIP 114456 K0a ... 7.12 0.75 0.19 ... 2.1–9.6k 34.6 ... ... ...
HIP 115819 K5a −4.3 ± 1.8j 10.45 1.27 ... ... 0.2–∼10y 148.5 146.8 −7.8 −21.6
HIP 116052 G5a ... 9.33 0.8 ... ... 0.3–∼10y 44.9 ... ... ...

Notes. aSIMBAD. bEstimated from V − J color and the relations of Lépine & Gaidos (2011). cEstimated from 2MASS photometry and the SEDs of Kraus & Hillenbrand (2007). dMaldonado et al. (2010). eCasagrande et al. (2011), quoted age is the 16–84 percentile range. fNordstrom et al. (2004). gEvans (1967). hLatham et al. (2002). iMassarotti et al. (2008). jBilir et al. (2005). kValenti & Fischer (2005). lHoward et al. (2010). mThis work. nLatham (2004). oDawson & De Robertis (2005). pWielen et al. (2000). qMontes et al. (2001). rWhite et al. (2007). sIsaacson & Fischer (2010); note the age quoted in the source does not give a range of values. We obtained a range of values by taking the quoted age and applying the 0.25 dex scatter to the age–activity relation found by Mamajek & Hillenbrand (2008). tChubak & Marcy (2011). uRobinson et al. (2007). vRamírez et al. (2009). wCalculated from the Mamajek & Hillenbrand (2008) Ca H&K activity to age relation using the activity measurement of Arriagada (2011). xMetallicity from Lee et al. (2011). yThis work; minimum age calculated from limiting X-ray flux and the relations of Mamajek & Hillenbrand (2008); approximate maximum age from disk-like kinematics. zThis work; minimum age is that from Shkolnik et al. (2009) for objects with no X-ray emission; approximate maximum age from disk-like kinematics. aaThis work; approximate maximum age from disk-like kinematics. bbGontcharov (2006).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

Table 11. Data on Our other Primary Stars

Object SpT V V − J Distance μαcos δ μδ Age [M/H] vtan
(mag.) (mag.) (pc.) (as yr−1) (as yr−1) (Gyr) (dex) (km s−1)
Other Companion Discoveries    
NLTT 1011 K5b 11.13 2.0 68.2$_{-6.5}^{+6.6}$ −0.076 −0.192 0.3–∼10i ... 66.8
GD 280 DAb 16.69 0.02 77$^{+35}_{-26}$ 0.169 −0.055 <10k ...  
NLTT 8245 M0c 12.63 2.98 53.0$^{+8.7}_{-7.5}$ −0.093 −0.164 0.3–∼10i ... 47.4
LSPM J0241+2553 WDl 18.19 1.19 69$^{+35}_{-23}$ −0.037 −0.153 <10k ...  
HD 253662 G8IVd 9.92 1.36 >62.3 −0.013 −0.164 0.3–<10k ...  
LSPM J0632+5053 G2b 9.87 1.26 95.0$_{-13.9}^{+16.3}$ 0.035 −0.154 0.2–∼10g ... 71.1
NLTT 18587 M2c 16.07 3.56 132$^{+40}_{-31}$ 0.177 −0.109 0.3–∼10i ... 130
NLTT 19109 M4c 17.8 4.33 132$^{+49}_{-36}$ 0.035 −0.165 0.3–∼10i ... 106
NLTT 22073 M2b 12.51 3.43 29.9$_{-6.9}^{+12.7}$ −0.315 0.16 0.4–∼10h 0.06b 50.1
NLTT 23716 K7c 11.84 2.70 48.2$^{+7.9}_{-6.8}$ 0.060 −0.277 0.3–∼10i ... 64.8
NLTT 26746 M4b 15.68 4.55 41.0$_{-10.3}^{+12.2}$ −0.251 −0.147 0.3–∼10i ... 56.5
NLTT 29395 M3c 15.00 3.87 56.4$^{+16.9}_{-13.0}$ 0.165 −0.112 0.3–∼10i ... 53.3
NLTT 30510 M2c 14.17 3.66 49.1$^{+14.8}_{-11.3}$ 0.218 −0.390 0.3–∼10i ... 104
NLTT 31450 M4b 14.93 4.15 34.6$_{-8.7}^{+10.3}$ −0.034 −0.202 0.3–∼10i ... 33.6
PMI 13410+0542 M1c 13.13 3.21 51.3$_{-11.8}^{+21.7}$ 0.047 −0.014 0.3–∼10i ... 11.9
PMI 13518+4157 M2.5b 13.93 4.04 43.1$_{-8.8}^{+9.9}$ −0.059 −0.058 0.3–∼10i ... 16.9
NLTT 38489 M3b 16.05 4.22 62.3$_{-17.0}^{+23.3}$ −0.147 0.183 1.2–∼10h ... 69.3
NLTT 39312 M2c 16.37 3.63 141$_{-33}^{+43}$ −0.025 −0.347 0.3–∼10i ... 232.4
LSPM J1627+3328 K7d 11.55 2.73 38.0$_{-5.4}^{+6.3}$ −0.171 −0.014 0.3–∼10i ... 30.9
NLTT 44368 M3b 13.17 2.78 55.0$_{-11.2}^{+12.7}$ −0.056 0.215 0.3–∼10i ... 57.9
LSPM J1717+5925 G6f 10.52 1.36 108$_{-26}^{+35}$ −0.090 −0.15 0.2–∼10g ... 89.5
NLTT 52268 M3c 14.36 3.97 37.3$_{-8.7}^{+11.3}$ 0.16 −0.089 0.3–∼10i ... 32.4
LSPM J2153+1157 M1.5b 13.9 3.82 36.2$_{-8.4}^{+10.9}$ −0.093 −0.128 0.3–∼10i 0.26b 27.1
PM I22118−1005 M2b 12.87 3.25 37.4$_{-7.7}^{+8.6}$ 0.028 −0.25 0.3–∼10i ... 44.6
NLTT 55219 M2c 13.93 3.65 44.7$_{-10.4}^{+13.5}$ 0.324 0.16 0.3–∼10i ... 76.6
Serendipitous Companion Discoveries    
NLTT 730 M4b 15.46 4.37 21.7$_{-5.3}^{+8.1}$ 0.375 −0.234 3–∼10i −0.15b 84.2
NLTT 27966 M5b 16.53 4.51 39.6$_{-10.2}^{+13.3}$ −0.153 0.182 0.3–∼10i ... 31.7
LSPM J1336+2541 M3b 14.73 3.55 60.7$_{-13.9}^{+15.7}$ −0.157 0.057 0.3–∼10i ... 48.1
HIP 73169 M0e 11.96 3.01 27.3$_{-6.3}^{+8.3}$ −0.267 −0.076 0.3–∼10i ... 36.0
PM I23492+3458 M2b 12.73 3.6 30.7$_{-6.3}^{+7.1}$ −0.011 −0.108 0.3–∼10i ... 15.8
Unlikely Companions    
NLTT 35593 M2c 14.57 3.6 63.0$_{-14.6}^{+19.1}$ −0.1837 −0.0548 0.3–∼10i ... 57.3

Notes. aApproximate spectral type based on 2MASS photometry and the SEDs from Kraus & Hillenbrand (2007). bThis work. cBased on V − J color and the relations presented in Lépine & Gaidos (2011). dSIMBAD. eGray et al. (2006). fHovhannisyan et al. (2009). gThis work; minimum age calculated from limiting X-ray flux and the relations of Mamajek & Hillenbrand (2008); approximate maximum age from disk-like kinematics. hThis work; minimum age calculated from lack of activity and the activity lifetimes of West et al. (2008); approximate maximum age from disk-like kinematics. iThis work; minimum age is that from Shkolnik et al. (2009) for objects with no X-ray emission; approximate maximum age from disk-like kinematics. jNo 2MASS photometry; approximate V − J calculated from optical photometry by Lépine & Shara (2005). kThis work; approximate maximum age from disk-like kinematics. lThis work; based on reduced proper motion diagram placement.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Table 12. Known Companions with Spectral Type M7 or Later that have Projected Separations of 100 AU or More

Object Position Separation SpT SpT Companion Mass Age References
(J2000) (AU) ('') Companion Primary (M) (Gyr)
2MASS J1258+4013 B 12 58 37.98 +40 14 01.7 6700 63 M7 M6 0.086–0.105 1–5 1
GG Tau Bb 04 32 30.31 +17 31 29.9 o 210 1.5 M7 K7+M0.5+M5 0.038–0.05 0.01–0.02 2
HD 65216 B 07 53 42.55 −63 38 51.5p 253 7.0 M7 G5 0.09 3–6 3
C       L2   0.078    
η Tel B 19 22 51.26 −54 25 30.7 190 4.2 M7/8 A0V <0.04 0.0017–0.025a 4
G121−42 B 12 00 32.92 +20 48 51.3q 5916 204.0 M7 M4 <0.085 4.0–5.0 5
USco 1602−2401 16 02 51.17 −24 01 50.5 1000 7.0 M7.5 K4 0.029–0.067 0.010–0.013k 65
TWA 5 B 11 31 55.4 -34 36 29 100 2.0 M8 M1.5 ∼0.02 0.01–0.3 6
LP 213−68 Ba 10 47 12.65 +40 26 43.7r 230 14 M8 M6.5 0.080–0.101 ... 7, 8
Bb       L1   0.068–0.090    
HII 1348 B 03 47 18.04 +24 23 25.73t 132 1.1 M8 K5* 0.053–0.055 0.100–0.125 73
BD+13 1727 B 07 39 43.86 +13 05 07.1 380 10.5 M8+L0.5 K5 ... ... 9
V1428 Aql B 19 16 57.62 +05 09 02.2r 400 75 M8 M3 ... ... 10
LP 655−23 B 04 30 51.58 -08 49 00.8 450 20 M8 M4 0.082–0.090 1–8 11, 12
2MASS J0126-5022 B 01 27 02.83 −50 23 21.1 5100 82.0 M8 M6.5 0.062–0.100b >0.2b 13, 14
HD 221356 B 23 31 01.616 −04 06 19.39 11900 452 M8 F8 0.088 5.5–8 11
C       L3   0.072    
HD 221356 D 23 31 30.95 −04 05 23.4 2050 12.13 L1 F8+M8+L3 0.073–0.085 2.5–7.9 29
G 266−33 B 00 03 42.27 −28 22 41.0 2610 66.0 M8 G8 0.1–0.103 0.9–1.4 5
G 63−23 B 13 20 41.59 +09 57 50.6 6445 169.0 M8 K5 0.083–0.093 0.5–3.0 5
NLTT 29131 B 11 58 24.04 −01 22 45.5 3490 26.8 M8v M4 ... ... 77
LSPM J1202+0742 Cx 12 01 59.65 +07 35 53.6 27200 446 M8v M0y+M1y ... ... 77
SDSS J163126.17+294847.1 B 16 31 26.17 +29 48 36.9r 756 10.1 M8 M5.5 ... ... 15
ULAS J132835.49+080819.5 B 13 28 34.69 +08 08 18.9 1250 11.9 M6 M8.5w ... ... 77
LSPM J2010+0632 B 20 10 35.39 +06 34 36.7 2100 143 M8.5 M3.5 ... ... 16
HD 212168 C 22 26 44.3 −75 03 42 6070 265 M8.5 G0 0.09–0.1 ... 17
APMPM J2354−3316 C 23 54 09.29 -33 16 26.6r 2200 8.0 M8.5 DA+M4 0.10 ∼1.8 18
USco 1612−1800 16 12 48.97 −18 00 49.6 430 3.0 M8.5 M3 0.019–0.042 0.010–0.013k 65
2MASS J00301179−3740483 B 00 30 06.26 -37 39 48.3r 89 4450 DA M9 0.07–0.08 >1.9 75
USco1610−1913 B 16 10 32.33 −19 13 08.67 840 5.8 M9 K7 0.017–0.027 0.010–0.013k 65
HIP 77900 B 15 54 30.47 −27 19 57.51 3200 21.8 M9 B6 0.017–0.027 0.010–0.013k 65
GSC 08047−00232 C 01 52 14.63 -52 19 30.0o 200 3.2 M9 M0.5+K3 0.015–0.035c 0.01–0.04 19
NLTT 22980 B 09 56 13.13 +01 45 14.3r 2980 30.4 M9 M2 ... ... 15
HR 6037 B 16 17 04.35 −67 56 26.3 366.0 6.7 M9 A6 0.42–0.82 0.2–0.4 20
SR 12 C 16 27 19.51 −24 41 40.4u 1100 8 M9m K4+M2.5 0.012–0.015 ∼0.002 70
GSC 06214−210 B 16 21 54.67 −20 43 11.3t 320 12.9 M9.5n K5 0.012–0.016 ∼0.005 69
G216−7 C 22 37 32.556 +39 22 39.81 634 33.6 M9.5 M3.5+M3.5 0.06–0.08 1–10 21
LEHPM 494 B 00 21 05.90 −42 44 43.3r 1800 78 M9.5 M6 0.075–0.083 2–10 11
DENIS J0551−4434 B 05 51 46.05 −44 34 11.0o 220 2.2 L0 M8.5 ∼0.06o 0.1–10 22
Denis-P J1347–7610 B 13 47 59.11 −76 10 05.4r 418 16.8 L0 M0 ... 0.2–1.4 23
HD 89744 B 10 22 14.89 +41 14 26.7r 2460 63 L0 F7 0.077–0.080 1.5–3 24
NLTT 2274 B 00 41 54.54 +13 41 35.5 483.0 23.0 L0 M4 0.081–0.083 4.5–10.0 5
LP 312−49 B 08 58 36.97 +27 10 50.8 801 15.4 L0 M4 ... ... 15
SDSS J130432.93+090713.7 B 13 04 33.16 +09 07 06.9 374 7.6 L0 M4.5 ... ... 15
SDSS J163814.32+321133.5 B 16 38 17.31 +32 11 44.1 2420 46.0 L0 M4 ... ... 15
1RXS J235133.3+312720 B 23 51 33.48 +31 27 22.9t 120 2.4 L0 M2 0.026–0.038 0.05–0.15 71
GJ 1048 B 02 35 59.93 −23 31 20.5r 250 11.9 L1 K2 0.055–0.075 0.6–2 25
AB Pic B 06 19 12.94 −58 03 20.9s 275 5.5 L1 K2 ∼0.01 ∼0.03e 26
G124–62 Ba 14 41 37.167 −09 45 59.0r 1496 44.0 L1 dM4.5e 0.054–0.082 0.5–0.8 27
Bb       L1f   0.054–0.082    
GQ Lup B 15 49 12.09 −35 39 03.9s 103 0.7 L1 K7 0.010–0.020g <0.002 28
ROX 42B b 16 10 31.98 −19 13 04.4t 140 1.8 L1m M1 0.006–0.014 0.0015–0.003 68, 79
G 255−24 B 13 32 45.31 +74 59 44.2 9710 38.3 L2 K8 ... 0.2–10.0 30
2MASS J05254550−7425263 B 05 25 38.76 −74 26 00.8 2000 44 L2 M3 0.06–0.075 1.0–10.0 31
G196–3 B 10 04 20.67 +50 22 59.6r 300 16.2 L2 M2.5 0.015–0.04 0.06–0.3 32
Gl 618.1 B 16 20 26.147 −04 16 31.55 1090 35 L2.5 M0 0.06–0.079 0.5–12 24
HD 106906 b 12 17 52.53 −55 58 27.3t 650 7.1 L2.5 F5 0.003–0.007 0.013–0.015k 66
G 63−33 B 13 20 44.27 +04 09 04.5 2010 66 L3 K2 0.079–0.081 3.3–5.1 5
G 73−26 B 02 07 35.60 +13 55 56.3 2774 73 L3 M2 0.079–0.081 3.0–4.0 5/15
eta Cancri B 08 32 31.87 +20 27 00.0 15020 164 L3.5 K3III 0.063–0.082 2.2–6.1 15
G 171−58 B 00 25 03.65 +47 59 19.1 9200 218 L4 F8 0.045–0.083 1.8–3.5 5
G 200−28 B 14 16 59.78 +50 06 26.4 25700 570 L4 G5 0.077–0.078 7.0–12.0 5
LHS 5166 B 10 18 18.74 +59 09 53.7r 160 8.43 L4 M4.5 0.055–0.075 2.6–8 27
1RXS J1609−2105 b 16 09 30.37 −21 04 56.9t 330 2.2 L4l M0 0.009–0.016 0.010–0.013k 67
GJ 1001 B 00 04 34.85 −40 44 05.9 180 18.6 L4.5 M4 0.060.075 1–10 33, 34, 35
C       L4.5   0.060.075    
Gl 417 Bab 11 12 25.674 +35 48 13.17r 2000 90.0 L4.5+L6g G0+G0 0.02–0.05‡ 0.08–0.3 34, 36
G203–50 B 17 11 45.59 +40 28 57.8r 135 6.4 L5.0 M4.5 0.051–0.074 1–5 37
GJ 499 B 13 05 41.07 +20 46 39.4 1360 516 L5 K5+M4 ... 3.5–10.0 30
G 259−20 B 17 43 08.60 +85 26 59.4 650 30 L5 M2.5 ... ... 16
LP 261–75 B 09 51 05.49 +35 58 02.1r 450 13.0 L6 M4.5 0.019–0.025 0.1–0.2 38
2MASS J01303563−4445411 B 01 30 35.80 -44 45 41.4 130 3.28 L6 M9 0.032–0.076 0.25–0.8 39
HD 203030 B 21 18 58.97 +26 13 46.1s 487 11.0 L7.5 G8 0.012–0.031 0.13–0.4 42
Gl 337 CD 09 12 14.69 +14 59 39.69r 43 L8+ ⩾ L8 G8+K1 0.04–0.074‡ 0.6–3.4 24, 43  
Gl 584 C 15 23 22.63 +30 14 56.2r 3600 194 L8 G1 0.045–0.075 1–2.5 44
HD 46588 B 06 46 27.56 +79 35 04.5r 1420 79.2 L9 F7 0.045–0.072 1.3–4.3 45
epsilon Indi Ba 22 04 10.52 −56 46 57.7r 1460 402.0 T1 K5 0.060–0.073i ∼5h 46, 47
Bb       T6   0.047–0.060h 0.5–7.0z  
2MASS J111806.99−064007.8 B 11 18 07.130 −06 40 15.82 650 7.7 T2 M4.5 0.06–0.07–6.0 ... 48
HN Peg B 21 44 28.47 +14 46 07.8r 795 43 T2.5 G0 0.012–0.030 0.1–0.5 49
GU Psc B 01 12 36.48 +17 04 31.8 2000 41.97 T3.5 M3 0.07–0.13 0.009–0.013 76
HIP 38939 B 07 58 01.61 −25 39 01.4 1630 88 T4.5 K4 0.018–0.058 0.3–2.8 50
LSPM J1459+0851 B 14 59 35.30 +08 57 51.6 21500 365 T4.5 DA 0.064–0.075 4–10 74
LHS 2803 B 13 48 02.90 −13 44 07.1 1400 67.6 T5 M4.5 0.068–0.081 3.5–10 51, 31
HD 118865 B 13 39 43.79 +01 04 36.4 9200 148 T5 F5 ... 1.5–4.9 52
HIP 73786 B 15 04 57.66 +05 38 00.8 1230 63.8 T6 K5 ... >1.6 53, 54
LHS 302 B 11 22 54.73 +25 50 21.5 4500 265 T6 M5 ... ... 55
G 204−39 B 17 58 05.46 +46 33 09.9r 2685 198 T6.5 M3 0.02–0.035 0.5–3.0 5
Gl 570 D 14 57 14.96 −21 21 47.8r 1500 258 T7 K4+M1.5+M3 0.03–0.07 2–5 56
HD 3651 B 00 39 18.91 +21 15 16.8r 480 43 T7.5 K0 0.018–0.058j 0.7–4.7 49, 57
SDSS J1416+30 B 14 16 23.94 +13 48 36.3 45–135 9.0 T7.5 L6p 0.03–0.04 ∼10 58, 59, 60
LHS 2907 B 14 23 20.86 +01 16 38.1 2680 156 T8 G1 0.019–0.047 2.3–14.4 16, 61
LHS 6176 B 09 50 47.28 +01 17 34.3 1400 52 T8 M4 ... >3.5 16, 52
Wolf 1130 B 20 05 20.38 +54 24 33.9 3000 188.5 T8 sd M1.5+DA 0.020–0.050 >2 72
Ross 458 C 13 00 41.73 +12 21 14.7 1162 102 T8.5 M0.5+M7 0.005–0.0014 <1.0 62
ξ UMa E 11 18 38.70 +31 25 37.9 4100 510 T8.5 F9+G0† 0.014–0.038 4.0–8.0 63
Wolf 940 B 21 46 38.83 −00 10 38.7 400 32 T8.5 M4 0.02–0.032 3.5–6 64
WD 0806–661 08 07 14.68 −66 18 48.7 2500 130 >Y0 DQ 0.03–0.10 1.2–2 78

Notes. Based on Table 1 from Faherty et al. (2010). This only contains objects that are spectrally confirmed companions. We do not include untyped candidate companions but make an exception for the Y dwarf companion to WD 0806−661 (Luhman et al. 2011), which is too faint in the near-infrared for spectral confirmation. aBinks & Jeffries (2014). bArtigau et al. (2009). cChauvin et al. (2005b). eMass calculated by Faherty et al. (2010), Faherty private communication. eSong et al. (2003). fReid et al. (2008). gBurgasser et al. (2005). hMarois et al. (2007). iKing et al. (2010). jLiu et al. (2007). kPecaut et al. (2012). lLafrenière et al. (2010). mBowler et al. (2014). nBowler et al. (2011). oPosition from SIMBAD. pPosition from Washington Double Star Catalogue. qPosition from Webb et al. (1999). rPosition from 2MASS. sPosition from Faherty et al. (2009). tPosition calculated using the position of the primary and the separation and position angle quoted in the discovery paper. uPosition of primary; discovery paper does not quote a position angle so calculation of the secondary's position is not possible. vWest et al. (2008). wZhang et al. (2010). xThis object is listed in Smith et al. (2014) as a companion to both components of the LSPM J1202+0742 system (the N and S components). We call it LSPM J1202+0742 C. ySpectral type estimated from 2MASS photometry and empirical SEDs for Kraus & Hillenbrand (2007). zLiu et al. (2010). † Both of these components of ξ UMa are themselves spectroscopic binaries. * The primary star is a spectroscopic binary. ‡ This mass estimate was based on the spectrophotometric properties of the object before it was determined to be an unresolved binary. References. (1) Radigan et al. (2009); (2) White et al. (1999); (3) Mugrauer et al. (2007); (4) Lowrance et al. (2000); (5) Faherty et al. (2010); (6) Lowrance et al. (1999); (7) Gizis et al. (2000); (8) Close et al. (2003); (9) Cruz et al. (2007); (10) van Biesbroeck (1944); (11) Caballero (2007); (12) Cruz et al. (2003); (13) Artigau et al. (2007); (14) Deacon & Hambly (2007); (15) Zhang et al. (2010); (16) Luhman et al. (2012); (17) Caballero & Montes (2012); (18) Scholz et al. (2004); (19) Neuhaeuser & Guenther (2004); (20) Huélamo et al. (2010); (21) Kirkpatrick et al. (2001); (22) Billères et al. (2005); (23) Phan-Bao et al. (2008); (24) Wilson et al. (2001); (25) Gizis et al. (2001); (26) Chauvin et al. (2005a); (27) Seifahrt et al. (2005); (28) Neuhaeuser et al. (2005); (29) Gauza et al. (2012); (30) Gomes et al. (2013); (31) Mužić et al. (2012); (32) Rebolo (1998); (33) Golimowski et al. (2004); (34) Kirkpatrick et al. (1999); (35) Martín (1999); (36) Bouy et al. (2003); (37) Radigan et al. (2008); (38) Reid & Walkowicz (2006); (39) Dhital et al. (2011); (40) Faherty et al. (2011); (41) Dupuy & Liu (2012); (42) Metchev & Hillenbrand (2006); (43) Burgasser et al. (2005); (44) Kirkpatrick et al. (2000); (45) Loutrel et al. (2011); (46) Scholz et al. (2003); (47) McCaughrean et al. (2004); (48) Reylé et al. (2013); (49) Luhman et al. (2007); (50) Deacon et al. (2012b); (51) Deacon et al. (2012a); (52) Burningham et al. (2013); (53) Scholz (2010a); (54) Murray et al. (2011); (55) Kirkpatrick et al. (2011); (56) Burgasser et al. (2000); (57) Mugrauer et al. (2006); (58) Scholz (2010b); (59) Burningham et al. (2010); (60) Bowler et al. (2009); (61) Pinfield et al. (2012); (62) Goldman et al. (2010); (63) Burningham et al. (2013); (64) Burningham et al. (2009); (65) Aller et al. (2013); (66) Bailey et al. (2014); (67) Lafrenière et al. (2008); (68) Kraus et al. (2014); (69) Ireland et al. (2011); (70) Kuzuhara et al. (2011); (71) Bowler et al. (2012); (72) Mace et al. (2013); (73) Geissler et al. (2012); (74) Day-Jones et al. (2011); (75) Day-Jones et al. (2008); (76) Naud et al. (2014); (77) Smith et al. (2014); (78) (Luhman et al. 2011); (79) (Currie et al. 2014). References. (1) Radigan et al. (2009); (2) White et al. (1999); (3) Mugrauer et al. (2007); (4) Lowrance et al. (2000); (5) Faherty et al. (2010); (6) Lowrance et al. (1999); (7) Gizis et al. (2000); (8) Close et al. (2003); (9) Cruz et al. (2007); (10) van Biesbroeck (1944); (11) Caballero (2007); (12) Cruz et al. (2003); (13) Artigau et al. (2007); (14) Deacon & Hambly (2007); (15) Zhang et al. (2010); (16) Luhman et al. (2012); (17) Caballero & Montes (2012); (18) Scholz et al. (2004); (19) Neuhaeuser & Guenther (2004); (20) Huélamo et al. (2010); (21) Kirkpatrick et al. (2001); (22) Billères et al. (2005); (23) Phan-Bao et al. (2008); (24) Wilson et al. (2001); (25) Gizis et al. (2001); (26) Chauvin et al. (2005a); (27) Seifahrt et al. (2005); (28) Neuhaeuser et al. (2005); (29) Gauza et al. (2012); (30) Gomes et al. (2013); (31) Mužić et al. (2012); (32) Rebolo (1998); (33) Golimowski et al. (2004); (34) Kirkpatrick et al. (1999); (35) Martín (1999); (36) Bouy et al. (2003); (37) Radigan et al. (2008); (38) Reid & Walkowicz (2006); (39) Dhital et al. (2011); (40) Faherty et al. (2011); (41) Dupuy & Liu (2012); (42) Metchev & Hillenbrand (2006); (43) Burgasser et al. (2005); (44) Kirkpatrick et al. (2000); (45) Loutrel et al. (2011); (46) Scholz et al. (2003); (47) McCaughrean et al. (2004); (48) Reylé et al. (2013); (49) Luhman et al. (2007); (50) Deacon et al. (2012b); (51) Deacon et al. (2012a); (52) Burningham et al. (2013); (53) Scholz (2010a); (54) Murray et al. (2011); (55) Kirkpatrick et al. (2011); (56) Burgasser et al. (2000); (57) Mugrauer et al. (2006); (58) Scholz (2010b); (59) Burningham et al. (2010); (60) Bowler et al. (2009); (61) Pinfield et al. (2012); (62) Goldman et al. (2010); (63) Burningham et al. (2013); (64) Burningham et al. (2009); (65) Aller et al. (2013); (66) Bailey et al. (2014); (67) Lafrenière et al. (2008); (68) Kraus et al. (2014); (69) Ireland et al. (2011); (70) Kuzuhara et al. (2011); (71) Bowler et al. (2012); (72) Mace et al. (2013); (73) Geissler et al. (2012); (74) Day-Jones et al. (2011); (75) Day-Jones et al. (2008); (76) Naud et al. (2014); (77) Smith et al. (2014); (78) (Luhman et al. 2011); (79) (Currie et al. 2014).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: Typeset image Typeset image Typeset image

Table 13. Keck LGS AO Observations of HIP 6407Bab on 2013 October 13 UT

Filter ρ P.A. Δm
(mas) (°) (mag)
YNIRC2 129.7 ± 2.7 48.4 ± 1.2 2.13 ± 0.06
JMKO 125.1 ± 1.6 51.1 ± 1.4 2.26 ± 0.05
HMKO 125.9 ± 1.0 51.3 ± 0.4 2.51 ± 0.05
CH4s 122.4 ± 2.9 50.3 ± 1.3 2.34 ± 0.05
weighted mean 125.8 ± 0.8 51.0 ± 0.4  ⋅⋅⋅

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

6. CONCLUSIONS

We have presented 57 newly discovered companions to known nearby stars, with 24 of these being previously unknown L dwarf companions. With the addition of spectral classification of previously known objects, we have characterized a total of 88 wide, common proper motion companions to nearby stars. We have increased the sample of late M companions with projected separations greater than ∼300 AU by 88% and increased the number of L dwarf companions in the same separation range by 82%. Examination of our discoveries and the previously known wide ultracool companion population indicates that although many of the systems are loosely bound, they are unlikely to be distrupted over several Gyr. This paper provides a large sample of wide ultracool companions to stars, which are excellent laboratories for testing models of substellar evolution and atmospheres. Additionally our late-type companions provide an opportunity to extend metallicity determinations for M dwarfs to cooler temperatures (Mann et al. 2014).

Figure 5.

Figure 5. IRTF/SpeX spectra for the primaries of our companions that had no spectral type in the literature. These spectra were taken with SpeX SXD mode and have been Gaussian smoothed to R = 200.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 6.

Figure 6. IRTF/SpeX spectra for our white dwarf Hipparcos companions. The wavelengths of the Paschen lines are also shown.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 7.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 7.
Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 7.

Figure 7. yP1 finder charts for our companions. Note that some regions are masked due to chip gaps and PS1 detector artifacts. Also note that some of the higher proper motion stars appear elongated due to these images being stacks of individual observations spread over the PS1 survey period.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 8.

Figure 8. Our bright M (left column) and ultracool (right column) dwarf companions to Hipparcos stars (red stars) compared to a population of coincident objects (black dots). The coincident objects were generated using a method similar to that of Lépine & Bongiorno (2007) by offsetting the positions of primary stars in our input file and then searching for companions around these positions. The significance of the proper motion difference is the quadrature sum of the proper motion difference in each axis divided by the total proper motion error on that axis (see Equation (1)). Both of our samples lie in areas of the plot that are sparsely populated by coincident pairings.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 9.

Figure 9. Our ultracool dwarf companions to faint non-HIP primaries (denoted by red stars) compared to a coincident population of objects (black dots). See Figure 8 caption for more details on the process. It appears one object, the apparent companion NLTT 35593 (μ = 0farcs19 yr−1), lies in a region inhabited by many coincident pairings. Hence, despite the pair's similar photometric distances, we consider this to be an unlikely companion, i.e., one which should be confirmed through other means.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 10.

Figure 10. Plot of the photometric distances to our secondaries compared to the distances to the primaries. Points plotted in red have trigonometric parallaxes for their primaries, those in blue have photometric distance estimates. Note that one of our objects (HD 253662) is a known subgiant and hence our quoted photometric distance is a lower limit.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 11.

Figure 11. Optical spectroscopy of our primary stars and one companion. Left: spectra taken with SNIFS on the University of Hawaii 88 inch telescope on Mauna Kea. Right: spectra taken with the Ritchey–Chretien Spectrograph on the Mayall 4 m telescope on Kitt Peak. The spectra for GD 280 A and LSPM J2153+1157 A were both noisy and so have been Gaussian smoothed to R = 300 to make their spectral features clearer. Note that the feature in the SNIFS spectra at 5200 Å is due to the boundary between the SNIFS red and blue channels. Note that the 7490–7700 Å region is strongly affected by tellurics.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 12.

Figure 12. Field ultracool binary population (secondary component M7 or later). The y-axis shows the ultracool companion spectral type, which is 0 at M0, 10 at L0, and 20 at T0. The blue dots represent previously identified objects, solid red stars are companions from our Hipparcos search, and open red stars are our companions from other sources. Our two T dwarf discoveries from Deacon et al. (2012b) (a Hipparcos companion) and Deacon et al. (2012a) (a serendipitous companion discovery) are also plotted here.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 13.

Figure 13. Histograms showing the projected separations of the wide (>100 AU) companion population. The top panel shows M7, M8, and M9 dwarfs; the middle panel L dwarfs; and the lower panel T dwarfs. For each spectral bin, the open histogram is the total population and the solid histogram is the contribution from our PS1-based efforts (this paper; Deacon et al. 2012a, 2012b).

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 14.

Figure 14. Total mass vs. separation for binary systems with at least one ultracool dwarf component from the literature and from our discoveries. The plot symbols are the same as Figure 12. In cases where we did not have an estimated mass for a substellar companion, we used a mass of 0.075 M. Hence these are upper limits on the total mass. All other masses are derived from the literature or from the spectral type to mass relation from Kraus & Hillenbrand (2007). The dotted line represents the approximate maximum separation (equivalent to vesc = 0.57 km s−1) suggested by Close et al. (2003) while the dashed line is the suggested log-normal maximum separation suggested by Reid et al. (2001). The three solid lines are the typical separations beyond which a binary is expected to be broken up by interactions in the Galactic disk over the course of 2, 5, and 10 Gyr (Dhital et al. 2010).

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 15.

Figure 15. Upper panel: the spectral decomposition of HIP 6407B. The best match was the combination of the L1 dwarf DENIS-P J170548.3−051645 (Burgasser et al. 2010; Allers & Liu 2013) and the T3 dwarf SDSS J120602.51+281328.7 (Chiu et al. 2006; Burgasser et al. 2010). Middle panel: the resulting flux ratios between the two objects. Lower panel: Keck LGS AO images from which we derive astrometry and flux ratios with contours drawn at logarithmic intervals. Images have been rotated such that north is up.

Standard image High-resolution image

The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys (PS1) have been made possible through contributions of the Institute for Astronomy, the University of Hawaii, the Pan-STARRS Project Office, the Max-Planck Society and its participating institutes, the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, Heidelberg and the Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching, The Johns Hopkins University, Durham University, the University of Edinburgh, Queen's University Belfast, the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, the Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network Incorporated, the National Central University of Taiwan, the Space Telescope Science Institute, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under grant No. NNX08AR22G issued through the Planetary Science Division of the NASA Science Mission Directorate, the National Science Foundation under grant No. AST-1238877, the University of Maryland, and Eotvos Lorand University (ELTE). The authors thank Bill Golisch, Dave Griep, and Eric Volqardsen for assisting with the IRTF observations. This research has benefited from the SpeX Prism Spectral Libraries, maintained by Adam Burgasser, at http://www.browndwarfs.org/spexprism. This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation. This research has benefited from the M, L, and T dwarf compendium housed at DwarfArchives.org and maintained by Chris Gelino, Davy Kirkpatrick, and Adam Burgasser. M.C.L. and E.A.M. were supported by NSF grants AST09-09222 (awarded to M.C.L.) and AST-0709460 (awarded to E.A.M.). E.A.M. was also supported by AFRL Cooperative Agreement FA9451-06-2-0338. This publication makes use of data products from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, which is a joint project of the University of California, Los Angeles, and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The United Kingdom Infrared Telescope is operated by the Joint Astronomy Centre on behalf of the Science and Technology Facilities Council of the U.K. This paper makes use of observations processed by the Cambridge Astronomy Survey Unit (CASU) at the Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge. The authors thank Mike Irwin and the team at CASU for making the reduced WFCAM data available promptly and Tim Carroll, Thor Wold, Jack Ehle and Watson Varricatt for assisting with UKIRT observations. This research has made use of the SIMBAD database, operated at CDS, Strasbourg, France. The VISTA Data Flow System pipeline processing and science archive are described in Irwin et al. (2004) and Hambly et al. (2008). We have used data from the first data release. This paper makes use of the Topcat software package (Taylor 2005). This research has made use of the Washington Double Star Catalog maintained at the U.S. Naval Observatory. We thank Luca Casagrande, Jackie Faherty, Adam Kraus, Eddie Schlafly, and Josh Schlieder for helpful discussions and our referee Sébastien Lépine for many helpful comments which improved the manuscript. Finally, the authors wish to recognize and acknowledge the very significant cultural role and reverence that the summit of Mauna Kea has always had within the indigenous Hawaiian community. We are most fortunate to have the opportunity to conduct observations from this mountain.

Facilities: IRTF (SpeX) - Infrared Telescope Facility, PS1 - Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System Telescope #1 (Pan-STARRS), UKIRT (WFCAM) - United Kingdom Infrared Telescope, UH:2.2m (SNIFS) - University of Hawaii 2.2 meter Telescope

Footnotes

  • 14 

    A term typically used to mean objects of spectral type M7 or later. These may be free-floating planetary mass objects, brown dwarfs, or very low-mass stars, depending on the spectral type and age of the object.

  • 15 

    For the LSPM J1202+0742 ABC system (Smith et al. 2014), we estimated the spectral type of the brighter component based on their V − J color (M0, LSPM J1202+0742N) or 2MASS photometry (M1, LSPM J1202+0742S). We then used these to determine the total mass of the system.

Please wait… references are loading.
10.1088/0004-637X/792/2/119