This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.

A publishing partnership

OPTICAL SPECTRAL PROPERTIES OF SWIFT BURST ALERT TELESCOPE HARD X-RAY-SELECTED ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI SOURCES

, , , , , and

Published 2010 January 19 © 2010. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.
, , Citation Lisa M. Winter et al 2010 ApJ 710 503 DOI 10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/503

0004-637X/710/1/503

ABSTRACT

The Swift Burst Alert Telescope survey of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) is providing an unprecedented view of local AGNs (〈z〉 ≈ 0.03) and their host galaxy properties. In this paper, we present an analysis of the optical spectra of a sample of 64 AGNs from the nine month survey, detected solely based on their 14–195 keV flux. Our analysis includes both archived spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and our own observations from the 2.1 m Kitt Peak National Observatory telescope. Among our results, we include line ratio classifications utilizing standard emission line diagnostic plots, [O iii] 5007 Å luminosities, and Hβ-derived black hole masses. As in our X-ray study, we find the type 2 sources to be less luminous (in [O iii] 5007 Å and 14–195 keV luminosities) with lower accretion rates than the type 1 sources. We find that the optically classified low-ionization narrow emission line regions, H ii/composite galaxies, and ambiguous sources have the lowest luminosities, while both broad-line and narrow-line Seyferts have similar luminosities. From a comparison of the hard X-ray (14–195 keV) and [O iii] luminosities, we find that both the observed and extinction-corrected [O iii] luminosities are weakly correlated with X-ray luminosity. In a study of the host galaxy properties from both continuum fits and measurements of the stellar absorption indices, we find that the hosts of the narrow-line sources have properties consistent with late-type galaxies.

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

1. INTRODUCTION

The Swift Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) provides an unprecedented opportunity to study the optical properties of an unbiased sample of active galactic nucleus (AGN). Conducting an all-sky mission in the 14–195 keV band, the BAT survey has detected 153 AGNs in the first nine months7 (Tueller et al. 2008; Baumgartner et al. 2008). Since the sources were detected based on 14–195 keV flux, with a flux limit of (2–3) ×  10−11 erg s−1 cm−2, selection effects due to obscuring material are minimal. Due to the unbiased nature of the Swift BAT survey, Suzaku follow-ups of Swift-detected sources led to the identification of a new class of "hidden" AGN (Ueda et al. 2007), heavily obscured (NH > 1023 cm−2) sources that would not likely be identified as AGN based on their optical or soft X-ray (E < 3 keV) properties alone. This class of "hidden" sources was found to comprise 24% of the nine month BAT AGNs (Winter et al. 2009a), making an analysis of the collective optical properties an important piece in understanding the properties of the Swift BAT-detected AGN.

Currently, great progress is being made in collecting and analyzing the multi-wavelength properties of this uniquely selected, very hard X-ray, nine month Swift BAT AGN sample. The collective properties of the 0.3–10 keV X-ray band have been analyzed and presented in Winter et al. (2009a). A comparison of the IR [O iv], optical [O iii], and X-ray 2–10 keV luminosity is presented in Meléndez et al. (2008) for a sample of 40 BAT AGNs. Simultaneous optical-to-X-ray spectral energy distributions are analyzed for 26 of the BAT AGNs in Vasudevan et al. (2009). Additionally, some details of the optical host properties are presented in Winter et al. (2009a) as well as Schawinski et al. (2009). Further, the results a full analysis of the optical colors and morphologies are being compiled in M. Koss et al. (2010, in preparation) and the Spitzer-based IR properties will be presented in Weaver et al. (2009). In this paper, we present an analysis of the optical spectral properties of a sub-sample of the AGN from the BAT nine month catalog.

Since the BAT-detected sources are bright (mV < 16) and nearby (〈z〉 = 0.03), they are easily observable with ground-based facilities. Between published optical spectral analyses, the publicly available Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) spectra, and our own follow-up observations with the Kitt Peak National Observatory's (KPNO) 2.1 m telescope of sources for which optical spectra/analyses were not available, we present the optical emission line properties of 64/153 of the SWIFT BAT AGNs. This sample includes 35 broad-line (55%) and 29 narrow-line (45%) sources, the same ratio as in the total sample. All selected sources were chosen based on positions viewable from the Kitt Peak Observatory. In this way, our sample represents 81% of the non-blazar "northern" BAT AGN sources. As in our X-ray study (Winter et al. 2009a), we exclude the beamed sources due to the different physical mechanisms producing their spectra (i.e., jets). The missing "northern" sources were missed purely due to observation scheduling and poor weather conditions. In the following sections, we describe the observations, data analysis, and finally our results.

2. OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION

For our analysis of the optical spectra of the Swift BAT-detected AGN, we first obtained spectra of our sources that were publicly available from the SDSS. We supplemented this data set with our own observations at the Kitt Peak Observatory. Additionally, we included several of the SDSS observed sources as Kitt Peak targets, in order to compare the results of our analysis from each observatory.

Our Kitt Peak observations were obtained on the 2.1 m telescope as part of MD-TAC time. Over the course of five observing trips, from 2006 August to 2009 April, we used the GoldCam spectrograph to observe the central region of ≈50 objects, including AGN and template galaxies. The AGNs observed were sources for which we could not find archived optical spectra or analyses of optical lines in the literature. The template galaxies (10) were chosen from non-active templates listed in Ho et al. (1997). A majority of the sources were observed with two 30 minute exposures in both the red (grating 35, which covers 4760–7240 Å) and blue (grating 26new, which covers 3660–6140 Å), through a 2'' slit. Both of these gratings have a spectral resolution of 3.3 Å, corresponding to a velocity width of 200 km s−1 at 5007 Å. The exposure times were chosen in order to achieve a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of ≈70 per pixel for the AGN sources and the dispersion relation for both gratings corresponds to ≈1.25 Å pixel−1. However, for some of the faintest sources we used a lower dispersion grating, grating 32, which covered a larger wavelength range than the higher dispersion gratings (4280–9220 Å, at 2.25 Å pixel−1 and which has a spectral resolution of 6.7 Å). We used this grating because of the unknown redshift of many of these sources.

Initial processing of the data proceeded using the standard tasks in IRAF8 to extract the spectra and remove cosmic rays. The spectra were dispersion corrected using comparison observations of the HeNeAr lamp taken at each telescope position. They were then flux calibrated using standard stars, from the spectrophotometric standards compiled by Massey et al. (1988), observed on the same night as the template/AGN. We then added the medium resolution red and blue spectra together to obtain a single medium resolution spectrum for each source.

In addition to the Kitt Peak observations, we include spectra from the SDSS data release 7 (Abazajian et al. 2009). Such spectra were publicly available for 24 of the non-blazar BAT AGN sources. A list of the BAT AGN nine month sources for which we analyzed Kitt Peak/Sloan spectra are listed in Table 1. The KPNO observations (with typical total exposure times of 1 hr in each medium resolution grating) were planned such that we would obtain similar signal-to-noise spectra as the SDSS spectra (S/N ≈75), to provide an easy comparison between both sets of spectra. In total, our sample consists of 64 sources, including 40 spectra from our KPNO observations, 24 with SDSS spectra (four sources having both a KPNO and SDSS spectrum), and 13 with emission-line properties listed in the literature (nine of which also have either a KPNO or SDSS spectrum). Details of the KPNO observations, including the extraction aperture along the slit, are listed in Table 2 for the target AGN sources and in Table 3 for the galaxy template sources. Details of the SDSS observations are listed in Table 4. Based on visual inspections of the AGN spectra, we indicate in the tables which sources display broad lines with a "B." In total, 33 sources (including three with emission-line properties available in the literature), 55% of the sample, exhibit clear broad lines (i.e., broad Hα and Hβ).

Table 1. SWIFT BAT-detected AGNs

Source R.A. (h m s) Decl. (d m s) Redshift E(BV)a Typeb Host Galaxyb Obs.c
Mkn 352 00:59:53.3 +31:49:36.8 0.015 0.06 Sy 1 SA0 Lit.
NGC 788 02:01:06.5 −06:48:55.8 0.014 0.03 Sy 2 SA(s)0/a KPNO
Mkn 1018 02:06:16.0 −00:17:29.2 0.043 0.03 Sy 1.5 S0; merger SDSS
LEDA 138501 02:09:34.3 +52:26:33.0 0.049 0.16 Sy 1   KPNO
Mkn 590 02:14:33.6 −00:46:00.3 0.026 0.04 Sy 1.2 SA(s)a SDSS
NGC 931 02:28:14.5 +31:18:42.1 0.017 0.10 Sy 1.5 Sbc Lit.
2MASX J03181899+6829322 03:18:19.0 +68:29:31.6 0.090 0.72 Sy 1.9   KPNO
NGC 1275 03:19:48.2 +41:30:42.1 0.018 0.16 Sy 2 NLRG Lit.
3C 105 04:07:16.5 +03:42:25.8 0.089 0.48 NLRG   KPNO
3C 111 04:18:21.3 +38:01:35.8 0.049 1.65 Sy 1 N KPNO
2MASX J04440903+2813003 04:44:09.0 +28:13:01.0 0.011 0.85 (Sy 2) S KPNO
MCG −01-13-025 04:51:41.5 −03:48:33.7 0.016 0.04 Sy 1.2 SAB(s)0+ pec KPNO
1RXS J045205.0+493248 04:52:05.0 +49:32:45.0 0.029 0.73 Sy 1   KPNO
NGC 2110 05:52:11.4 −07:27:22.3 0.008 0.38 Sy 2 SAB0- Lit.
MCG +08-11-011 05:54:53.6 +46:26:22.0 0.021 0.22 Sy 1.5 SB0 KPNO
IRAS 05589+2828 06:02:10.7 +28:28:22.1 0.033 0.43 Sy 1   KPNO
Mkn 3 06:15:36.3 +71:02:15.0 0.014 0.19 Sy 2 S0 KPNO
2MASX J06411806+3249313 06:41:18.0 +32:49:31.4 0.048 0.15 Sy 2   KPNO
Mkn 6 06:52:12.2 +74:25:37.0 0.019 0.14 Sy 1.5 SAB0+ KPNO
Mkn 79 07:42:32.8 +49:48:34.8 0.022 0.07 Sy 1.2 SBb KPNO
Mkn 18 09:01:58.4 +60:09:06.2 0.011 0.04 (H II/Ambig.) S? SDSS, KPNO
SDSS J090432.19+553830.1 09:04:32.2 +55:38:30.3 0.037 0.02 (Sy 1.5)   SDSS
SDSS J091129.97+452806.0 09:11:30.0 +45:28:06.0 0.027 0.02 (Sy 2)   SDSS
SDSS J091800.25+042506.2 09:18:00.3 +04:25:06.2 0.156 0.04 (Sy 2)   SDSS
MCG −01-24-012 09:20:46.3 −08:03:22.1 0.020 0.03 Sy 2 SAB(rs)c KPNO
MCG +04-22-042 09:23:43.0 +22:54:32.6 0.033 0.04 Sy 1.2   SDSS, KPNO
Mkn 110 09:25:12.9 +52:17:10.3 0.035 0.01 Sy 1 Pair? SDSS
NGC 3227 10:23:30.6 +19:51:54.0 0.004 0.02 Sy 1.5 SAB(s) pec KPNO, Lit.
Mkn 417 10:49:30.9 +22:57:52.4 0.033 0.03 Sy 2 Sa SDSS, KPNO
NGC 3516 11:06:47.5 +72:34:07.0 0.009 0.04 Sy 1.5 (R)SB(s) KPNO, Lit.
1RXS 112716.6+190914 11:27:16.3 +19:09:20.2 0.106 0.02 Sy 1.8   KPNO
SBS 1136+594 11:39:09.0 +59:11:54.8 0.061 0.01 Sy 1.5   SDSS
UGC 06728 11:45:16.0 +79:40:53.0 0.007 0.10 Sy 1.2 SB0/a KPNO
CGCG 041-020 12:00:57.9 +06:48:23.1 0.036 0.02 (Sy 2)   SDSS
NGC 4051 12:03:09.6 +44:31:52.7 0.002 0.01 Sy 1.5 SAB(rs)bc KPNO, Lit.
Ark 347 12:04:29.7 +20:18:58.4 0.022 0.03 Sy 2 S0: pec SDSS, KPNO
NGC 4102 12:06:23.0 +52:42:39.8 0.003 0.02 LINER SAB(s)b? KPNO, Lit.
NGC 4138 12:09:29.8 +43:41:07.1 0.003 0.01 Sy 1.9 SA(r)0+ Lit.
NGC 4151 12:10:32.6 +39:24:20.6 0.003 0.03 Sy 1.5 (R')SAB(rs)ab KPNO, Lit.
Mkn 766 12:18:26.5 +29:48:46.3 0.013 0.02 Sy 1.5 (R')SB(s)a KPNO
NGC 4388 12:25:46.7 +12:39:42.8 0.009 0.03 Sy 2 SA(s)b SDSS, Lit.
NGC 4395 12:25:48.9 +33:32:48.7 0.001 0.02 Sy 1.8 SA(s)m SDSS, Lit.
NGC 4593 12:39:39.4 −05:20:39.3 0.009 0.03 Sy 1 (R)SB(rs)b KPNO
MCG +09-21-096 13:03:59.5 +53:47:30.1 0.030 0.02 Sy 1   KPNO
NGC 4992 13:09:05.6 +11:38:02.9 0.025 0.03 (LINER) Sa SDSS
NGC 5252 13:38:15.9 +04:32:33.3 0.023 0.03 Sy 1.9 S0 SDSS
NGC 5506 14:13:14.9 −03:12:27.4 0.006 0.06 Sy 1.9 Sa pec SDSS
NGC 5548 14:17:59.6 +25:08:12.7 0.017 0.02 Sy 1.5 (R')SA(s)0/a SDSS, Lit.
Mkn 813 14:27:25.1 +19:49:51.5 0.111 0.03 Sy 1   KPNO
Mkn 841 15:04:01.2 +10:26:16.0 0.036 0.03 Sy 1.5 E KPNO
Mkn 290 15:35:52.4 +57:54:09.5 0.030 0.02 Sy 1 E1? SDSS
Mkn 1498 16:28:04.0 +51:46:31.0 0.055 0.03 Sy 1.9   KPNO
NGC 6240 16:52:58.9 +02:24:03.0 0.025 0.08 Sy 2 I0: pec KPNO
1RXS J174538.1+290823 17:45:38.2 +29:08:22.0 0.111 0.05 (Sy 1)   KPNO
3C 382 18:35:03.4 +32:41:46.8 0.058 0.07 Sy 1   KPNO
NVSS J193013+341047 19:30:13.3 +34:10:47.0 0.063 0.19 (Sy 1.5)   KPNO
1RXS J193347.6+325422d 19:33:47.6 +32:54:22.0 0.030 0.27 (BL COMP)   KPNO
3C 403 19:52:15.8 +02:30:24.5 0.059 0.19 NLRG S0 KPNO
Cygnus A 19:59:28.3 +40:44:02.0 0.056 0.38 Sy 2 S?; Radio gal. KPNO
MCG +04-48-002 20:28:35.1 +25:44:00.0 0.014 0.45 Sy 2 S KPNO
4C +74.26 20:42:37.3 +75:08:02.0 0.104 0.44 Sy 1   KPNO
IGR 21247+5058 21:24:38.1 +50:58:58.0 0.020 2.43 Sy 1   KPNO
RX J2135.9+4728 21:35:55.0 +47:28:23.2 0.025 0.62 Sy 1   KPNO
UGC 11871 22:00:41.4 +10:33:08.7 0.027 0.06 Sy 1.9 Sb KPNO
NGC 7319 22:36:03.5 +33:58:33.0 0.023 0.08 Sy 2 SB(s)bc pec KPNO
3C 452 22:45:48.8 +39:41:15.7 0.081 0.14 NLRG   KPNO
Mkn 926 23:04:43.5 −08:41:08.6 0.047 0.04 Sy 1.5   SDSS

Notes. aMilky Way reddening values, E(BV), obtained from NED. bAGN type and host galaxy type from NED, Tueller et al. (2008), and the results of this paper. For AGN types, optical identifications are listed, where available. Values in parentheses indicate classifications from this paper, where "Sy 1" is a source with broad emission lines and narrow-line emission consistent with a Seyfert and "Sy 2" is a source without broad emission lines and with narrow-line emission consistent with a Seyfert. Sub-classifications were made (i.e., Sy 1.5) following the criteria of Osterbrock (1981) (based upon the ratio of the broad to narrow components of Hα and Hβ). Where "Gal" is indicated, there are no optical emission lines indicative of the presence of an AGN. The optical spectrum looks like a galaxy spectrum. Additional host galaxy classifications were obtained from the LEDA database. Where "?" is indicated, there is no available classification. cObservation type from Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) archive or our Kitt Peak Observations (KPNO). Sources with line ratios that we have obtained in the literature are indicated by (Lit.). dThis source was initially included in the 9 month catalog based on an earlier method of source selection. However, with subsequent analysis it fell below the 4.8σ detection threshold. It is detected above 5σ and included in the 22 month BAT survey.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

Table 2. Details of KPNO Observations

Source Grating UT Date Exp. (s) x (kpc)a y (kpc)a B?b
NGC 788 35 2006 Nov 20 3600 0.53 4.49  
LEDA 138501 26new 2006 Nov 17 1800 1.93 5.53 B
LEDA 138501 35 2006 Nov 19 1800 1.93 7.53 B
3C 111 35 2006 Nov 20 2700 1.90 7.42 B
2MASX J04440903+2813003 26new 2006 Nov 17 3380 0.44 2.25  
2MASX J04440903+2813003 35 2006 Nov 19 3601 0.44 1.71  
MCG −01-13-025 26new 2006 Nov 18 3600 0.62 2.79 B
MCG −01-13-025 35 2006 Nov 19 3601 0.62 2.79 B
1RXS J045205.0+493248 26new 2006 Nov 18 3600 1.13 3.21 B
1RXS J045205.0+493248 35 2006 Nov 20 3600 1.13 4.27 B
2MASX J06411806+3249313 35 2006 Nov 20 5400 1.88 8.71  
Mkn 79 26new 2007 Apr 14 1200 0.87 3.62 B
Mkn 79 35 2007 Apr 15 2401 0.87 3.38 B
Mkn 18 26new 2006 Nov 18 3601 0.43 2.87  
Mkn 18 35 2006 Nov 19 3600 0.43 2.34  
MCG −01-24-012 26new 2007 Apr 14 1200 0.76 3.77  
MCG −01-24-012 35 2007 Apr 15 1199 0.76 2.98  
MCG +04-22-042 26new 2007 Apr 14 1200 1.30 4.32 B
MCG +04-22-042 35 2007 Apr 15 1200 1.30 4.16 B
Mkn 417 35 2006 Nov 20 3600 1.28 5.00  
1RXS J1127166.6+190914 26new 2007 Apr 14 1200 4.19 24.62  
1RXS J1127166+190914 35 2007 Apr 15 2399 4.19 15.32  
UGC06728 26new 2006 Nov 18 3000 0.25 0.81 B
UGC06728 35 2006 Nov 19 3600 0.25 0.89 B
Ark 347 26new 2007 Apr 14 1199 0.87 6.05  
Ark 347 35 2007 Apr 15 1200 0.87 4.45  
NGC 4593 26new 2007 Apr 14 1200 0.35 1.77 B
NGC 4593 35 2007 Apr 15 1200 0.35 2.24 B
MCG +09-21-096 26new 2007 Apr 14 2399 1.17 3.90 B
MGC +09-21-096 35 2007 Apr 15 2400 1.17 4.56 B
Mkn 813 26new 2007 Jun 15 2399 4.40 15.92 B
Mkn 813 35 2007 Jun 17 2700 4.40 12.75 B
Mkn 841 26new 2007 Jun 15 2399 1.42 5.56 B
Mkn 841 35 2007 Jun 17 2700 1.42 4.59 B
Mrk 1498 26new 2007 Jun 16 3600 2.15 8.38  
Mrk 1498 35 2007 Jun 18 3600 2.15 12.31  
NGC 6240 26new 2007 Jun 15 2400 0.96 3.73  
NGC 6240 35 2007 Jun 17 2701 0.96 7.65  
1RXS J174538.1+290823 26new 2007 Apr 14 2400 4.43 17.28 B
1RXS J174538.1+290823 35 2007 Apr 15 3601 4.43 17.86 B
3C 382 26new 2007 Jun 15 3599 2.28 8.88 B
3C 382 35 2007 Jun 17 3601 2.28 27.10 B
3C 382 35 2007 Jun 18 2700 2.28 7.31 B
NVSS J193013+341047 26new 2007 Jun 16 3600 2.48 8.56 B
NVSS J193013+341047 35 2007 Jun 18 3602 2.48 6.60 B
1RXS J193347.6+325422 26new 2007 Jun 15 2399 1.17 3.17 B
1RXS J193347.6+325422 35 2007 Jun 17 2700 1.17 4.27 B
3C 403 26new 2006 Nov 17 3600 2.32 18.93  
3C 403 26new 2006 Nov 18 1918 2.32 10.21  
3C 403 35 2006 Nov 19 3599 2.32 9.05  
3C 403 35 2006 Nov 20 1800 2.32 9.23  
Cyg A 26new 2007 Jun 16 2401 2.21 8.60  
Cyg A 35 2007 Jun 18 2699 2.21 13.76  
MCG +04-48-002 26new 2006 Nov 18 1801 0.54 2.11  
MCG +04-48-002 35 2006 Nov 19 3601 0.54 2.11  
4C +74.26 26new 2007 Jun 16 2400 4.13 11.16 B
4C +74.26 35 2007 Jun 18 2698 4.13 24.36 B
IGR 21247+5058 26new 2007 Jun 15 2400 0.78 3.04 B
IGR 21247+5058 35 2007 Jun 17 2701 0.78 2.86 B
UGC 11871 26new 2006 Nov 17 1800 1.04 4.73  
UGC 11871 26new 2006 Nov 18 1800 1.04 4.36  
UGC 11871 35 2006 Nov 19 1800 1.04 4.84  
UGC 11871 35 2006 Nov 20 1800 1.04 4.35  
NGC 7319 26new 2007 Jun 15 1422 0.88 3.42  
NGC 7319 35 2007 Jun 17 2736 0.88 5.84  
2MASX J03181899+6829322 32 2006 Nov 21 3599 3.57 15.28  
3C 105 32 2006 Nov 21 3599 3.53 10.87  
MCG +08-11-011 32 2008 Dec 4 900 0.80 6.23 B
IRAS 05589+2828 32 2006 Nov 21 1800 1.29 1.79 B
Mkn 3 32 2008 Dec 4 540 0.53 4.10  
Mkn 6 32 2008 Dec 4 900 0.73 5.71 B
NGC 3227 32 2009 Apr 17 900 0.15 0.46 B
NGC 3516 32 2009 Apr 17 900 0.34 1.53 B
NGC 4051 32 2009 Apr 17 900 0.09 0.30  
NGC 4102 32 2009 Apr 17 900 0.11 0.58  
NGC 4151 32 2009 Apr 17 900 0.13 0.43 B
Mrk 766 32 2009 Apr 17 900 0.50 2.29  
NVSS 19013+341047 32 2006 Nov 21 3600 2.48 11.97 B
RX J2135.9+4728 32 2006 Nov 21 3600 0.98 7.31 B
3C 452 32 2006 Nov 21 5401 3.21 18.76  

Notes. aAn estimate of the extraction aperture along the slit in both x and y is given in units of kpc. The x value is calculated as the fixed 2'' slit size, converted to kpc using the redshift to the source. The y value is obtained from the aperture size used to extract the individual spectrum. bB indicates the presence of broad lines (particularly H i Balmer lines) from a visual inspection of the spectra.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

Table 3. Details of KPNO Observations of Template Galaxies

Source Grating UT Date Exp. (s) x (kpc)a y (kpc)a
NGC 205 26new 2006 Nov 17 2101 0.03 0.09
NGC 205 35 2006 Nov 19 1800 0.03 0.19
NGC 221 26new 2006 Nov 18 1800 0.03 0.16
NGC 221 35 2006 Nov 20 1799 0.03 0.15
NGC 628 26new 2006 Nov 17 3600 0.09 0.65
NGC 628 35 2006 Nov 19 1800 0.09 1.01
NGC 1023 26new 2006 Nov 17 1799 0.08 0.67
NGC 1023 35 2006 Nov 20 1800 0.08 0.68
NGC 3384 26new 2006 Nov 17 1799 0.09 0.66
NGC 3884 35 2006 Nov 20 1801 0.09 0.82
NGC 3640 26new 2006 Nov 17 1800 0.16 1.52
NGC 3640 35 2006 Nov 20 1800 0.16 1.91
NGC 4914 26new 2007 Apr 14 1200 0.61 3.01
NGC 4914 35 2007 Apr 15 1200 0.61 3.71
NGC 5308 26new 2007 Jun 16 1801 0.26 1.83
NGC 5308 35 2007 Jun 18 1800 0.26 5.50
NGC 5557 26new 2007 Apr 14 1200 0.42 3.36
NGC 5557 35 2007 Apr 15 1200 0.42 4.21
NGC 5638 26new 2007 Jun 16 1800 0.22 1.77
NGC 5638 35 2007 Jun 18 1800 0.22 5.57
NGC 6654 26new 2007 Jun 16 1800 0.24 1.26
NGC 6654 35 2007 Jun 18 1799 0.24 3.53

Note. aAn estimate of the extraction aperture along the slit in both x and y is given in units of kpc.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Table 4. Details of SDSS Observations

Source UT Date Exp. (s) Plate Tile d (kpc)a B?b
Mkn 1018 2000 Sep 25 2700 404 193 2.53 B
Mkn 590 2003 Jan 8 4200 1073 9328 1.52 B
Mkn 18 2007 Dec 5 4204 1785 1290 0.64  
SDSS J090432.19+553830.1 2000 Dec 29 9000 450 238 2.17 B
SDSS J091129.97+452806.0 2002 Feb 7 4803 832 603 1.58  
SDSS J091800.25+042506.2 2003 Mar 9 3000 991 763 9.40  
MCG +04-22-042 2005 Dec 23 4800 2290 1658 1.94 B
Mkn 110 2001 Dec 9 4803 767 553 2.05 B
Mkn 417 2006 Dec 16 5884 2481 1736 1.94  
SBS 1136+594 2002 May 6 5408 952 724 3.60 B
CGCG 041-020 2005 Jan 15 3100 1622 1147 2.11  
Ark 347 2008 Jan 6 6008 2608 1821 1.29  
NGC 4388 2004 Jun 10 2400 1615 1140 0.52  
NGC 4395 2006 Mar 25 3000 2015 1471 0.06  
NGC 4992 2004 Apr 21 2100 1696 1212 1.46  
NGC 5252 2002 Apr 10 2701 853 624 1.35  
NGC 5506 2002 Apr 14 2646 916 688 0.35  
NGC 5548 2006 May 4 2500 2127 1533 0.99 B
Mkn 290 2002 Mar 14 3904 615 400 1.76 B
Mkn 926 2001 Dec 15 3304 725 503 2.77 B

Notes. aThe diameter of the aperture size for SDSS (3'') in kpc. bB indicates the presence of broad lines (particularly H i Balmer lines) from a visual inspection of the spectra.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

3. DATA ANALYSIS

Analysis of the spectra consisted of three steps: dereddening the spectrum to correct for reddening from the Milky Way, continuum subtraction, and fitting the emission lines. The spectra were dereddenned using the IDL procedure CCM_UNRED from the Goddard IDL Astronomy User's Library. This procedure uses the reddening curve of Cardelli et al. (1989), with RV = 3.1, and the input value of EBV. The Milky Way EBV values (listed in Table 1) were obtained for the Kitt Peak and SDSS observed sources from the NASA Extragalactic Database (NED). Following this step, the spectra were de-redshifted to their rest-frame wavelengths, using the NED redshifts or measured redshift from the [O iii] 5007 Å line. Following the continuum fits (Section 3.1), we measured the emission (Section 3.2) and absorption (Section 3.3) line parameters for prominent spectral features. We then tested for aperture effects by comparing emission line and stellar absorption line measurements with redshift, finding no correlations.

3.1. Continuum Modeling

In order to fit the emission lines as correctly as possible, great care must be taken in modeling the continuum. For an AGN source, we expect the continuum to be a combination of non-thermal emission from the AGN and stellar light from the host galaxy. To model the contribution from stellar light, we used the population synthesis models from the GALAXEV package9 (Bruzual & Charlot 2003) in the 3200–9300 Å range. The spectral resolution of these models (≈3 Å) is directly comparable to that in the SDSS and KPNO samples. We assume that the galaxy light is the sum of bursts of formation at different ages, using stellar populations at three different ages (25, 2500, and 10,000 Myr) to determine whether the host is consistent with a young, intermediate, or old population (or any combination of these three). While a three component stellar model (young, intermediate, old) does not fully describe the spectra of all galaxies, we have found (see the Appendix) that adding more components results in degenerate solutions with different sums of the 10 spectral models in the Bruzual & Charlot instantaneous burst models. We thus use the three component models adopted and recognize that this may not be a fully accurate description of the stellar components of the host galaxies. Additionally, we used three metallicity levels: 0.05 Z (2.5 Z), 0.02 Z (Z), and 0.004 Z ($\frac{1}{5}\, Z_{\odot }$). We use the same code described in Tremonti et al. (2004), which was used to measure the continuum in a sample of 53,000 SDSS galaxies. As described in Tremonti et al. (2004), the best fit is obtained using a nonnegative least-squares fit using the same metallicity for all three of the "age" groups, attenuated by dust (which is modeled as a free parameter). The χ2 values, using different metallicity populations, are compared to find the best-fit metallicity range. We note, however, that these models depend upon necessary assumptions, such as stellar populations created in an instantaneous burst of star formation (see Conroy et al. 2009 for a discussion of many of the associated uncertainties in single stellar population models), which are not physical.

To test the effectiveness of the galaxy continuum fits, we first applied the models to our set of template galaxies obtained at KPNO. The final input to the Tremonti et al. (2004) code is the galaxy's velocity dispersion, a quantity that is unknown for many of our AGN host galaxies. Therefore, we fit each of the templates with a range of dispersion values to obtain the best fit. These values were then compared to the known galaxy parameters, listed in LEDA10 (Paturel et al. 2003). The galaxy type and velocity dispersion, as well as the fitted values, are listed in Table 5. On average, we find that the fitted dispersion velocities (for a Gaussian, FWHM =2.35 × σ) are in agreement with the central velocity dispersions listed in LEDA (〈σM〉 = 132 km s−1, while the LEDA values give 〈vdisp〉 = 159 km s−1). From a comparison of the galaxy type to the light fraction (at 5500 Å) from the young, intermediate, and old stellar populations, there are no obvious contradictions. Our sample includes late spirals through ellipticals and we find that the models suggest the light is dominated by intermediate to old stellar populations in most of the galaxies (this is consistent with the color analysis of the images found by M. Koss et al. 2010, in preparation). In Figure 1, we plot examples of the results of the stellar continuum fitting. We find that the models are particularly accurate at fitting the blue end (below 5000 Å) of the spectra. While the addition of more stellar populations (at different ages) would provide better fits to the spectra, Tremonti et al. (2004) point out that the fits are often degenerate (they use 10 different population ages). Therefore, in an effort to get a broad understanding of the stellar properties of the AGN host galaxy properties, we confine our fits to the young, intermediate, and old populations indicated above.

Figure 1.

Figure 1. KPNO spectra of four template galaxies (black) with the best-fit continuum model (blue) described in Table 5. Using three simple stellar population models (young, intermediate, old), we find that we can replicate the spectra well, particularly in the blue end of the spectrum. Using additional populations at intervening ages, we could better replicate the spectra. However, such fits are degenerate (Tremonti et al. 2004) and we would lose information about the host galaxy, when fitting to our AGN sources (for which the host properties are not well defined).

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 5. Stellar Light Fits to the Galaxy Templates

Galaxy Typea vdispa FWHMb Zb Lfyoungb Lfintermb Lfoldb
NGC 205 E5 pec 40.8 300 0.2 Z 0.02 0.98
NGC 221 cE2 71.8 170 Z 0.05 0.95
NGC 628 SA(s)c 72.2 270 Z 0.07 0.40 0.53
NGC 1023 SB(rs)0- 204.5 300 2.5 Z 0.02 0.98
NGC 3384 SB(s)0- 148.4 300 Z 1.00
NGC 3640 E3 181.6 430 2.5 Z 0.10 0.90
NGC 4914 E+ 223.6 330 2.5 Z 0.46 0.53
NGC 5308 S0- 227.2 370 Z 1.00
NGC 5557 E1 253.0 400 2.5 Z 0.27 0.73
NGC 5638 E1 165.0 270 Z 1.00
NGC 6654 (R')SB(s)0/a 157.8 270 Z 0.05 0.95

Notes. aThe galaxy type was obtained from NED while the central velocity dispersion was found in LEDA. Typical errors on the central velocity dispersion are of the order 5 km s−1. These templates were selected from the non-active galaxy templates listed in Ho et al. (1997). bThe fitted values using the stellar population models of Bruzual & Charlot (2003) include the FWHM (km s−1), metallicity (Z), and light fractions (Lf) at 5500 Å using populations at 25 (young), 2500 (interm), and 10000 (old) Myr. A dash indicates no contribution from the indicated component.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Additionally, we created a grid of test spectra using different combinations of the three stellar populations indicated. Random noise was added to the test spectra, which were then broadened with FWHM =300 km s−1 and an instrumental resolution of 75 km s−1, and reddened using the Charlot & Fall (2000) law. The results of continuum fits to these test spectra are presented in Appendix A. As shown, we find that the velocity dispersion is well determined for our test spectra while the metallicities are not. We can clearly distinguish young stellar populations from the intermediate/old populations, however, there is a degeneracy between the intermediate and old populations when they are combined with the young populations. These degeneracies are taken into account in the following discussions. We also created a grid of test spectra including a power-law contribution similar to that of our sample along with the stellar populations, from which we found no degeneracy between the power law and stellar components (see Appendix A).

In order to subtract a continuum from the KPNO and the SDSS spectra, we modified the galaxy modeling code to include a non-thermal power-law contribution from the AGN ($p_0 \times \lambda ^{p_1}$, where p0 is constrained to range from 0 to 1 and p1 > 0). In our model, separate reddening values were fitted for both the power-law component and the stellar component. Additionally, in our fits we masked out regions near prominent emission line positions (i.e., Hβ, [O iii] λ5007) at a standard width of 500 km s−1 and used a larger width of 7000 km s−1 around Hα. For the broad-line sources (identified as such by visual inspection of the optical spectra), we masked a larger region with a width of 10,000 km s−1 around prominent hydrogen and helium emission features (Hγ, Hδ, Hβ, Hα, He i, and He ii). The results of these fits are presented in Table 6. Average values of p1 for our sources were 0.67, very similar to the power-law slopes found for luminous quasars by Richards et al. (2006), with a range of fitted values from 0 to 2.89. The average value for p0 is 0.47, with values ranging from 0 to 1. As listed in the Table 6, p0 was calculated for the specific flux at 1 Å and has units of 10−17 erg s−1 cm−2 Å−1.

Table 6. Stellar Light Fits to the AGN Sources

Source FWHMa Za p0a p1a Lfpowa Lfyounga Lfinterma Lfolda χ2/dof
KPNO spectra    
NGC 788 200 2.5 Z 1.00 0.77 0.73 0.05 0.09 0.12 10.3
LEDA 138501 400 0.2 Z 0.56 0.37 1.00 1.0
2MASX J03181899+6829322 200 0.2 Z 1.00 17.9
3C 105 170 0.2 Z 1.00 25.3
3C 111 200 2.5 Z 0.32 0.96 1.00 2840
2MASX J04440903+2813003 460 2.5 Z 0.01 1.58 1.00 101
MCG −01-13-025 330 2.5 Z 0.06 0.94 3.0
MCG +04-22-042 260 0.2 Z 1.00 4.9
1RXS J045205.0+493248 460 Z 0.26 0.75 1.00 107
MCG +08-11-011 50 0.2 Z 0.25 0.75 60.1
IRAS 05589+2828 400 2.5 Z 0.00b 1.43 0.78 0.22 30.3
Mkn 3 50 0.2 Z 1.00 85.8
2MASX J06411806+3249313 200 0.2 Z 0.53 0.83 1.00 2.7
Mkn 6 430 0.2 Z 1.00 0.44 0.16 0.84 95.6
Mkn 79 460 Z 1.00 0.51 1.00 3.4
Mkn 18 460 2.5 Z 0.35 0.58 0.08 4.7
MCG −01-24-012 400 Z 1.00 0.02 0.02 0.98 2.5
MCG +04-22-042 260 0.2 Z 1.00 4.9
NGC 3227 50 0.2 Z 0.46 0.26 0.28 15.2
Mkn 417 200 2.5 Z 0.11 1.09 0.98 0.01 0.01 2.8
NGC 3516 50 0.2 Z 0.32 0.68 21.9
1RXS J1127166+190914 270 2.5 Z 0.22 1.06 0.99 0.01 5.0
UGC 6728 460 2.5 Z 1.00 0.32 0.33 0.67 6.1
NGC 4051 300 0.2 Z 1.00 0.54 0.39 0.61 12.5
Ark 347 300 Z 1.00 1.7
NGC 4102 50 0.2 Z 0.28 0.72 21.9
NGC 4151 50 0.2 Z 0.71 0.29 92.7
Mkn 766 360 0.2 Z 1.00 0.45 0.39 0.61 15.4
NGC 4593 460 Z 0.19 0.81 8.2
MCG +09-21-096 230 0.2 Z 1.00 0.8
Mkn 813 460 2.5 Z 1.00 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.68 1.1
Mkn 841 400 Z 0.08 0.62 1.00 2.9
Mkn 1498 460 Z 1.00 1.7
NGC 6240 460 Z 1.00 0.23 0.01 0.99 8.1
1RXS J174538.1+290823 400 0.2 Z 0.00b 2.89 0.94 0.06 3.7
3C 382 460 2.5 Z 0.56 0.00 0.08 0.92 0.3
NVSS J193013+341047 130 0.2 Z 1.00 0.45 0.44 0.10 0.45 2.2
1RXS J193347.6+325422 460 Z 0.00 2.01 1.00 12.9
3C 403 270 2.5 Z 1.00 0.53 0.72 0.09 0.19 1.8
Cygnus A 270 Z 0.56 0.00 0.01 0.99 6.3
MCG +04-48-002 400 2.5 Z 0.29 0.53 0.18 17.3
4C +74.26 430 0.2 Z 1.00 0.52 0.07 0.93 90.6
IGR 21247+5058 230 2.5 Z 1.00 0.61 0.22 0.78 0.4
RX J2135.9+4728 460 0.2 Z 1.00 1.5
UGC 11871 430 0.2 Z 0.00b 1.73 0.77 0.11 0.11 1.1
NGC 7319 460 Z 0.01 1.42 0.93 0.07 0.8
3C 452 200 0.2 Z 1.00 6.1
SDSS spectra    
Mkn 1018 50 0.2 Z 0.02 0.51 0.01 0.99 1.4
Mkn 590 50 2.5 Z 0.17 0.46 0.02 0.98 3.6
Mkn 18 50 0.2 Z 0.22 0.26 0.52 1.4
SDSS J090432.19+553830.1 200 0.2 Z 1.00 0.39 1.00 3.0
SDSS J091129.97+452806.0 50 0.2 Z 0.53 0.70 0.63 0.06 0.31 1.4
SDSS J091800.25+042506.2 330 2.5 Z 1.00 0.09 0.12 0.88 2.4
MCG +04-22-042 460 0.2 Z 0.62 0.51 1.00 7.4
Mkn 110 50 0.2 Z 0.03 0.53 0.03 0.97 11.1
Mkn 417 50 Z 1.00 0.32 0.18 0.03 0.79 2.9
SBS 1136+594 400 0.2 Z 1.00 0.27 1.00 4.9
CGCG 041-020 50 0.2 Z 1.00 0.12 0.01 0.01 0.30 0.67 1.7
Ark 347 50 Z 1.00 0.40 0.12 0.88 6.0
NGC 4388 50 0.2 Z 0.82 0.21 0.01 0.99 19.5
NGC 4395 50 0.2 Z 1.00 0.20 0.23 0.77 15.5
NGC 4992 50 Z 1.00 0.31 0.10 0.90 2.59
NGC 5252 50 Z 1.00 0.37 0.13 0.87 5.2
NGC 5506 50 2.5 Z 0.00b 2.28 0.96 0.04 31.8
NGC 5548 330 Z 1.00 0.54 1.00 4.9
Mkn 290 50 0.2 Z 1.00 0.36 1.00 2.9
Mkn 926 400 Z 1.00 0.41 1.00 14.9

Notes. aThe fitted values using the stellar population models of Bruzual & Charlot (2003) include FWHM (km s−1), metallicity (Z), and light fractions (Lf) at 5500 Å using both a power-law and stellar population models with ages of 25 (young), 2500 (interm), and 10,000 (old) Myr. The values p0 and p1 are the power-law components, defined as $p_0 \times \lambda ^{p_1}$. The constant factor, p0, is constrained to range from 0 to 1 and is the specific flux at 1 Å with units of 10−17 erg s−1 cm−2 Å−1. Where a component's contribution (e.g., power law) was not required in the best fit, a dash is indicated. bFor the indicated sources, the value of p0 < 0.01 but non-negligible. The parameter p0 for the marked sources is 9.9 × 10−5 (IRAS 05589+2828), 4.2 × 10−12 (1RXS J174538.1+290823), 2 × 10−4 (UGC 11871), and 1.6 × 10−7 (NGC 5506).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

As we show in Appendix A, we found no statistical degeneracies between the power-law component and stellar continua based upon our simulations. However, the issue of separating stellar and non-thermal AGN continua is complex. In order to assess the degree of degeneracy in our models, we carefully analyzed the results of our model fits. From our models, 37% of the narrow-line sources (sources in this category tend to be classified as Sy 1.8/1.9 sources by other authors) and 38% of the broad-line sources have contributions of 50% or greater from a power law. We examined the spectra of these sources in the region from 3800 to 4200 Å, which includes the important stellar diagnostic lines of Ca H and K as well as the Hδ absorption. For broad-line sources with high power-law contributions, we find that absorption lines tend to be weak, while [Ne iii] (at 3869 and 3968 Å) and occasionally weaker hydrogen Balmer (Hζ, Hepsilon, Hδ) emission lines are comparatively strong. For the narrow-line sources, sources with strong power-law contributions tend to have weak to no clearly evident absorption features. Nearly half of these narrow-line spectra have either poor fits to the data (χ2 > >1) or no spectral coverage at the blue wavelengths which include important stellar lines like Ca H and K (making the fits less reliable). Therefore, the effects of any degeneracies between power-law and stellar population models are likely small for our purposes (i.e., rough estimates of the continuum).

In Figures 2 and 3, we show examples of the continuum results. Both the original and continuum subtracted spectra are plotted in black with the continuum plotted in blue. For the majority of sources, we find acceptable fits with the stellar + power-law continuum models. Particularly, good fits are obtained for the narrow-line sources. For the broad-line sources, the presence of broad Balmer lines makes it particularly hard to obtain a good fit to the spectrum below ≈4500 Å (see, for example, the spectrum of MCG +04-22-042).

Figure 2.

Figure 2. SDSS spectra of four AGNs, two narrow-line sources (top) and two broad-line sources (bottom), before and after the continnum subtraction (black). The best-fit continuum model is plotted in blue (described in Table 6). The continuum model utilizes three simple stellar population models (young, intermediate, old) along with a power-law model to account for AGN emission.

Standard image High-resolution image
Figure 3.

Figure 3. Best-fit individual components (power-law and stellar components, modulated by reddening) fitted to the spectra shown in Figure 2. The flux is shown in units of 10−17 erg s−1 cm−2  Å−1. The sources shown include NGC 4992 (top left), Mrk 417 (top right), Mkn 1018 (bottom left), and MCG +04–22–042 (bottom right). The combined fit is shown in red, while individual stellar components and the power law are each shown in blue. Masked regions are shown in green. The first three sources have strong galaxy contributions, each dominated by a contribution from an old population. The final source is best fitted with a pure reddened power-law model.

Standard image High-resolution image

To show how the spectra and continuum models for spectra taken at KPNO compare to the SDSS spectra, we plot the KPNO and SDSS spectra + continuum fits for the four sources with spectra from both in Figure 4. We chose to show the region from 3700 to 6200 Å, a region which includes both prominent emission lines (i.e., Hβ and [O iii]) and intrinsic absorption features (Ca H and K, the G Band, Mg ib, and Na iD). Both the SDSS and KPNO spectra of Ark 347 are well fitted with a continuum dominated by an old stellar population at solar metallicity. The KPNO spectrum of Mkn 417 is found to be dominated by a power law, while the SDSS continuum is dominated by a solar metallicity old stellar population. For the broad-line source MCG +04-22-042, neither the KPNO or SDSS spectra are fitted well at the blue end of the spectrum (due to the hydrogen Balmer lines), making it unsurprising that the models do not match.

Figure 4.

Figure 4. SDSS spectra (blue) and KPNO spectra (black) of the four AGN sources with spectra from both sources, focusing on a region (3700–6200 Å) which shows both emission (i.e., Hβ and [O iii]) and intrinsic absorption features. The fitted continuum for each spectrum is shown with the dotted lines. Comparison of the two sets of spectra for each source shows good agreement between the flux measurements and spectral shape.

Standard image High-resolution image

Finally, for Mkn 18, different metallicities (low in the SDSS spectrum and high in the KPNO spectrum) and galaxy contributions are found. However, as our test models showed, the metallicities are not well determined with the continuum models. The young stellar population contributions are similar for both the KPNO and SDSS spectra, leaving the discrepancy in the intermediate and old contributions as a likely effect of the degeneracy we found in our test models between the intermediate and old populations. The difference in the continuum flux between the KPNO and SDSS spectra of Mkn 18 is an extreme case, likely due to the fact that Mkn 18 is highly elliptical and inclined along the E–W direction of the slit in the KPNO observation (15''), while the circular fiber of the SDSS (3'') misses out on this flux.

3.2. Emission-line Fitting

To measure the properties of the emission lines in the KPNO and SDSS spectra (including the FWHM and flux of each line), we adopted two separate methods for the narrow-line and broad-line spectra. For the narrow-line spectra, we first measured the prominent lines in two distinct regions, the regions surrounding Hβ and Hα. At the blue end of the spectrum, we fixed the positions of the Hγ, Hβ, and [O iii] lines (λ4959 and λ5007), requiring that the velocity offset and FWHM of the lines remain the same for all of the lines measured, and fit for the flux and equivalent width. For spectra whose wavelength range includes [O ii] λ3727, an important diagnostic for distinguishing low-ionization narrow emission line regions (LINERs; Heckman 1980), we include this line in the fits to the blue end of the spectrum. Additionally, we followed the same procedure to fit the prominent emission lines surrounding and including Hα, [O i] λ6300, [N ii] λ6548, [N ii] λ6584, [S ii] λ6716, and [S ii] λ6731. The intensities of the [N ii] lines are fixed such that the λ6548 line is at a 1:2.98 ratio with the λ6584 line, as dictated by atomic physics. For all of the narrow-line fits, the FWHM was corrected for the instrumental resolution (200 km s−1 at 5007 Å for the KPNO spectra and 75 km s−1 for the SDSS spectra) and we placed the restriction that the FWHM values have a lower limit of 50 km s−1and an upper limit of 1000 km s−1. The results are recorded in Table 7. In Table 8, we include the intensity ratios for additional weaker lines (i.e., Hδ, [N i], He i) measured in the spectra.

Table 7. Emission-line Properties For Strong Lines (Narrow-line Sources)

Source FWHMbluea [O ii] λ3727b Hγ λ4340b Hβ λ4861.3b [O iii] λ4959b [O iii] λ5007b log F(Hα)
  FWHMreda [O i] λ6300b [N ii] λ6548b [N ii] λ6583b [S ii] λ6716b [S ii] λ6731b  
KPNO spectra
NGC 788 674.2 ± 30.6 ... ... 1.82 ± 0.65 2.31 ± 0.76 3.79 ± 1.53  
  177.7 ± 5.0 0.81 ± 0.22 0.44 1.33 0.95 0.92 −13.29
2MASX J03181899+6829322 144.8 ± 1.5 ... 0.14 ± 0.01 0.37 ± 0.01 1.06 ± 0.01 2.93 ± 0.03  
  50.0c 0.09 ± 0.01 0.14 0.43 ± 0.01 0.35 ± 0.02 0.26 ± 0.02 −14.09
3C 105 243.6 ± 2.1 ... ... 0.13 ± 0.01 0.74 ± 0.01 2.49 ± 0.04  
  50.0c 0.22 ± 0.01 0.57 ± 0.01 1.71 ± 0.03 0.34 ± 0.02 0.57 ± 0.02 −14.10
2MASX J04440903+2813003 299.4 ± 1.4 ... 0.05 0.15 0.21 0.60  
  160.5 ± 0.5 −0.13 0.45 1.34 0.52 0.47 −13.17
Mkn 3 410.5 ± 0.5 ... 0.08 0.15 0.69 2.21 ± 0.01  
  153.5 ± 2.8 0.24 0.40 1.20 ± 0.01 0.27 0.35 −11.65
2MASX J06411806+3249313 216.0 ± 1.8 ... 0.18 ± 0.04 0.32 ± 0.01 1.25 ± 0.02 3.65 ± 0.05  
  233.9 ± 5.2 0.24 ± 0.01 0.13 0.40 ± 0.01 0.26 ± 0.01 0.22 ± 0.01 −13.97
Mkn18 478.0 ± 31.7 1.79 ± 0.99 0.23 ± 0.02 0.55 ± 0.11 0.41 ± 0.06 0.69 ± 0.18  
  33.3 ± 24.8 0.10 0.33 ± 0.05 0.45 ± 0.08 0.18 ± 0.03 0.19 ± 0.02 −12.72
MCG −01-24-012 541.7 ± 23.6 0.64 ± 0.02 0.07 0.48 ± 0.05 1.05 ± 0.13 2.02 ± 0.35  
  301.9 ± 10.4 0.19 0.31 ± 0.01 0.67 ± 0.02 0.34 0.17 ± 0.07 −13.14
Mkn 417 107.8 ± 3.1 ... 0.10 ± 0.05 0.27 ± 0.01 0.83 ± 0.01 1.97 ± 0.02  
  50.0c 0.23 ± 0.01 0.27 0.83 ± 0.01 0.32 ± 0.01 0.31 ± 0.01 −13.76
1RXS J1127166+190914 169.3 ± 1.5 ... ... 0.41 ± 0.03 1.35 ± 0.13 3.99 ± 1.00  
  442.5 ± 21.0 0.25 0.42 ± 0.02 0.86 ± 0.02 0.37 0.21 ± 0.01 −13.03
Ark 347 166.3 ± 9.4 0.56 ± 0.03 0.14 ± 0.00 0.59 ± 0.05 1.49 ± 0.28 3.60 ± 1.58  
  355.4 ± 5.1 0.3 ± 0.01 0.22 ± 0.12 1.11 ± 0.45 0.54 ± 0.03 0.54 ± 0.05 −13.08
NGC 4102 262.2 ± 50.5 ... ... 0.29 ± 1.96 0.14 ± 1.77 0.39 ± 2.21  
  334.6 ± 4.6 0.09 ± 0.17 0.41 ± 0.14 0.93 ± 0.02 0.15 ± 0.14 0.16 ± 0.15 −12.25
Mkn 1498 321.3 ± 16.8 1.14 ± 0.08 0.50 ± 0.02 1.35 ± 0.25 2.47 ± 0.47 5.69 ± 2.62  
  256.3 ± 18.3 0.05 0.19 0.26 ± 0.10 0.14 0.11 ± 0.00 −13.18
NGC 6240 425.1 ± 23.8 0.35 ± 0.01 0.02 0.11 ± 0.01 0.06 ± 0.01 0.20 ± 0.01  
  377.4 ± 1.4 0.27 0.33 1.00 0.36 0.52 −12.73
3C 403 134.6 ± 4.2 0.21 ± 0.03 0.10 ± 0.02 0.32 ± 0.02 1.30 ± 0.03 3.69 ± 0.05  
  50.0c 0.16 0.32 0.96 ± 0.01 0.30 ± 0.01 0.29 ± 0.01 −13.87
Cygnus A 115.8 ± 3.1 0.98 ± 0.01 0.12 0.27 ± 0.01 0.92 ± 0.01 2.68 ± 0.03  
  320.4 ± 6.5 0.26 0.59 1.77 ± 0.01 0.51 0.43 −13.04
MCG +04-48-002 186.0 ± 5.9 1.05 ± 0.05 0.18 0.60 ± 0.02 0.27 ± 0.00 0.72 ± 0.02  
  197.6 ± 16.0 0.19 0.57 ± 0.03 0.85 ± 0.28 1.00 ± 0.06 0.76 ± 0.03 −12.99
UGC 11871 50.0c 0.22 0.05 0.14 0.16 0.31 ± 0.01  
  279.1 ± 6.7 0.08 0.24 0.67 0.22 0.20 −12.25
NGC 7319 285.0 ± 20.1 2.34 ± 0.09 0.17 ± 0.03 0.66 ± 0.10 1.21 ± 0.10 2.18 ± 0.16  
  239.9 ± 3.6 0.42 ± 0.04 0.60 ± 0.01 1.81 ± 0.03 0.80 ± 0.02 0.55 ± 0.02 −13.68
3C 452 235.1 ± 7.3 ... ... 0.14 ± 0.01 0.36 ± 0.02 0.98 ± 0.03  
  50.0c 0.21 ± 0.01 0.32 ± 0.01 0.95 ± 0.03 0.27 ± 0.02 0.20 ± 0.03 −14.22
SDSS spectra
Mkn 18 91.8 ± 1.1 ... 0.08 0.20 0.09 0.29  
  117.2 ± 0.7 0.05 0.15 0.44 ± 0.01 0.20 0.16 −12.98
SDSS J091129.97+452806.0 140.9 ± 3.4 ... 0.05 ± 0.01 0.12 ± 0.01 0.29 ± 0.01 0.90 ± 0.02  
  118.0 ± 2.3 0.10 ± 0.01 0.24 ± 0.00 0.72 ± 0.02 0.29 ± 0.01 0.23 ± 0.01 −14.49
SDSS J091800.25+042506.2 176.2 ± 0.8 0.56 ± 0.01 0.08 0.25 1.00 ± 0.01 3.02 ± 0.03  
  187.7 ± 1.4 0.18 0.22 0.66 ± 0.01 0.22 ± 0.01 0.20 −14.08
Mkn 417 196.3 ± 6.4 0.43 ± 0.02 0.07 ± 0.00 0.24 ± 0.01 1.08 ± 0.18 2.95 ± 1.19  
  228.8 ± 7.2 0.20 0.20 0.62 ± 0.05 0.23 ± 0.01 0.23 ± 0.01 −13.02
CGCG 041-020 133.9 ± 2.0 0.25 ± 0.01 0.07 0.18 ± 0.01 0.26 ± 0.01 0.73 ± 0.01  
  120.5 ± 1.4 0.09 ± 0.01 0.23 0.68 ± 0.01 0.25 ± 0.01 0.22 ± 0.01 −13.96
Ark 347 225.6 ± 5.0 0.5 0.07 0.27 0.91 ± 0.03 2.46 ± 0.07  
  171.7 ± 0.7 0.11 0.39 1.18 0.30 0.28 −13.27
NGC 4388 188.3 ± 0.4 ... 0.10 0.34 ± 0.02 1.12 ± 0.16 2.67 ± 0.66  
  280.7 ± 3.8 0.12 ± 0.01 0.11 ± 0.03 0.53 ± 0.10 0.19 ± 0.05 0.26 ± 0.03 −12.33
NGC 4395 270.7 ± 0.5 ... 0.11 0.31 0.74 ± 0.01 2.07 ± 0.03  
  248.2 ± 0.6 0.19 0.07 0.21 0.13 0.16 −12.81
NGC 4992 113.5 ± 5.1 1.42 ± 0.70 0.34 ± 0.04 0.28 ± 0.11 0.31 ± 0.48 1.30 ± 2.15  
  106.9 ± 4.0 0.87 ± 0.39 0.86 ± 0.31 2.06 ± 2.96 0.59 ± 0.60 0.30 ± 0.22 −14.32
NGC 5252 186.0 ± 0.9 ... 0.10 0.24 0.52 ± 0.01 1.57 ± 0.02  
  211.9 ± 1.0 0.34 ± 0.01 0.32 0.95 ± 0.01 0.45 ± 0.01 0.41 ± 0.01 −13.32
NGC 5506 289.1 ± 0.6 ... 0.04 0.17 ± 0.01 0.43 ± 0.03 1.24 ± 0.24  
  333.8 ± 7.0 0.12 0.27 ± 0.01 0.70 ± 0.06 0.14 ± 0.02 0.12 ± 0.03 −11.99

Notes. aThe FWHM of the lines, in km s−1, are tied together for all of the narrow emission lines listed in this table. bRatio of the intensity of the indicated line to the intensity of Hα. The units of the Hα flux are erg s−1 cm−2. Where errors are not indicated, the errors are on the order of 10−3. cIndicated FWHM of the lines was fixed to the narrow velocity value of 50 km s−1.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Table 8. Emission-line Fluxes For Weaker Lines (Narrow-line Sources)

Source [Ne iii] λ3869a [O iii] λ4363a He ii λ4686a [N i] λ5199a
  He i λ5876a [Fe vii] λ6087a [O i] λ6363a [Fe x] λ6375a [Ar iii] λ7136a
NGC 788 ... ... ... −14.13 ± 0.16 −14.09 ± 0.12
  −14.28 ± 0.14 −14.72 ± 0.22 −15.03 ± 0.31 ... −14.71 ± 0.24
2MASX J03181899+6829322 ... −14.02 ± 0.16 −14.87 ± 0.18 −15.69 ± 0.34 −15.75 ± 0.39
  ... −15.62 ± 0.32 −16.50 ± 0.78 −14.96 ± 0.20 −15.87 ± 0.54
3C 105 ... ... ... ... −15.84 ± 0.43
  ... −15.29 ± 0.24 ... −15.24 ± 0.27 −14.60 ± 0.15
2MASX J04440903+2813003 ... ... ... −14.71 ± 0.15 −13.85 ± 0.06
  ... ... ... ... ...
Mkn 3 ... ... −13.22 ± 0.22 ... −13.17 ± 0.14
  −13.40 ± 0.16 −13.55 ± 0.19 −12.82 ± 0.10 −13.83 ± 0.29 −12.75 ± 0.09
2MASX J06411806+3249313 ... ... −14.64 ± 0.26 −15.37 ± 0.33 −15.71 ± 0.39
  −15.46 ± 0.29 −15.37 ± 0.27 −15.08 ± 0.22 −15.65 ± 0.39 −15.14 ± 0.28
Mkn 18 −14.19 ± 0.17 −14.29 ± 0.16 −15.14 ± 0.37 −14.84 ± 0.25 −14.32 ± 0.20
  −14.40 ± 0.21 ... ... ... −14.33 ± 0.13
MCG −01-24-012 −14.27 ± 0.16 −15.46 ± 0.55 −14.85 ± 0.24 −14.90 ± 0.23 −14.98 ± 0.31
  −14.82 ± 0.27 −15.31 ± 0.46 −15.06 ± 0.26 −15.13 ± 0.28 ...
Mkn 417 ... ... ... −15.77 ± 0.54 −15.08 ± 0.23
  −14.99 ± 0.20 ... −15.01 ± 0.20 −16.35 ± 0.70 −15.10 ± 0.26
1RXS J1127166+190914 ... ... ... −14.66 ± 0.18 −14.69 ± 0.17
  ... −14.82 ± 0.19 −14.67 ± 0.17 −14.68 ± 0.18 ...
Ark 347 −14.02 ± 0.16 −14.74 ± 0.30 −14.83 ± 0.31 −14.51 ± 0.20 −14.44 ± 0.26
  −14.25 ± 0.24 −14.39 ± 0.28 −14.68 ± 0.23 −15.56 ± 0.54 −14.49 ± 0.18
NGC 4102 ... ... −13.76 ± 0.25 ... −13.82 ± 0.20
  ... −16.20 ± 1.17 ... −15.04 ± 0.68 −14.05 ± 0.27
Mkn 1498 −13.78 ± 0.09 −14.36 ± 0.15 −14.15 ± 0.11 −14.21 ± 0.12 −15.01 ± 0.36
  −14.87 ± 0.41 −15.35 ± 0.66 −15.23 ± 0.37 −15.54 ± 0.49 −14.61 ± 0.23
NGC 6240 −14.24 ± 0.26 −14.46 ± 0.29 −15.27 ± 0.54 ... −13.82 ± 0.19
  ... ... −13.86 ± 0.11 ... ...
3C 403 −14.56 ± 0.23 −16.38 ± 0.92 −15.31 ± 0.39 −14.91 ± 0.25 −14.87 ± 0.23
  −15.07 ± 0.20 −15.07 ± 0.17 −15.19 ± 0.19 −15.16 ± 0.19 −14.52 ± 0.18
Cygnus A −13.55 ± 0.10 −14.20 ± 0.17 −14.24 ± 0.15 −14.11 ± 0.12 −14.01 ± 0.17
  −14.74 ± 0.39 −14.87 ± 0.42 −14.12 ± 0.11 −14.79 ± 0.22 −14.14 ± 0.13
MCG +04-48-002 ... −15.03 ± 0.37 −14.82 ± 0.26 ... −14.32 ± 0.14
  −14.40 ± 0.14 ... ... ... −14.95 ± 0.22
UGC 11871 −14.06 ± 0.14 −14.68 ± 0.24 −14.90 ± 0.29 −14.63 ± 0.20 −14.31 ± 0.32
  −14.44 ± 0.32 −15.89 ± 0.90 −14.43 ± 0.15 ... −14.60 ± 0.23
NGC 7319 −13.98 ± 0.22 −14.45 ± 0.31 −14.87 ± 0.42 −14.83 ± 0.37 −14.29 ± 0.30
  −14.68 ± 0.42 −14.88 ± 0.47 −14.52 ± 0.18 −15.69 ± 0.57 −14.76 ± 0.25
3C 452 ... ... ... ... ...
  ... ... ... ... −14.79 ± 0.20
Mkn 18 −14.64 ± 0.15 −14.43 ± 0.12 −15.23 ± 0.28 −15.35 ± 0.32 −14.99 ± 0.23
  −14.50 ± 0.14 ... −15.04 ± 0.27 −16.29 ± 0.79 −14.85 ± 0.24
SDSS J091129.97+452806.0 −15.53 ± 0.24 −16.02 ± 0.36 −16.44 ± 0.53 −16.11 ± 0.40 −16.31 ± 0.48
  −15.75 ± 0.27 −16.52 ± 0.57 ... ... −16.20 ± 0.48
SDSS J091800.25+042506.2 −14.70 ± 0.08 −15.50 ± 0.18 −15.35 ± 0.16 −15.27 ± 0.15 −15.57 ± 0.20
  −15.73 ± 0.24 −15.96 ± 0.30 −15.36 ± 0.17 −16.22 ± 0.43 −15.36 ± 0.18
Mkn 417 −14.26 ± 0.08 −15.10 ± 0.16 −14.93 ± 0.14 −14.82 ± 0.13 −15.30 ± 0.22
  −15.25 ± 0.20 −15.37 ± 0.25 −14.80 ± 0.13 −15.76 ± 0.36 −14.88 ± 0.15
CGCG 041-020 −15.30 ± 0.20 −15.47 ± 0.23 −15.78 ± 0.33 −15.79 ± 0.34 −15.84 ± 0.37
  −15.79 ± 0.36 −16.00 ± 0.45 ... −15.95 ± 0.44 ...
Ark 347 −14.00 ± 0.07 −14.69 ± 0.12 −14.73 ± 0.13 −14.38 ± 0.10 −14.88 ± 0.17
  −14.65 ± 0.14 −14.34 ± 0.11 −14.73 ± 0.16 −15.28 ± 0.29 −14.26 ± 0.11
NGC 4388 −13.65 ± 0.06 −14.18 ± 0.08 −14.30 ± 0.08 −14.06 ± 0.07 −14.55 ± 0.11
  −14.28 ± 0.09 −14.55 ± 0.12 −14.07 ± 0.08 −15.30 ± 0.25 −13.86 ± 0.07
NGC 4395 −13.55 ± 0.07 −14.04 ± 0.08 −14.05 ± 0.08 −14.10 ± 0.08 −14.74 ± 0.12
  −14.37 ± 0.09 −15.19 ± 0.17 −14.07 ± 0.08 −15.61 ± 0.26 −14.18 ± 0.08
NGC 4992 −15.43 ± 0.25 −15.75 ± 0.34 ... −15.78 ± 0.38 −15.81 ± 0.42
  −16.89 ± 0.90 −15.94 ± 0.49 −15.82 ± 0.44 ... ...
NGC 5252 −13.98 ± 0.08 −14.67 ± 0.13 −14.81 ± 0.17 −14.77 ± 0.16 −14.72 ± 0.16
  −15.08 ± 0.24 −15.40 ± 0.37 −14.28 ± 0.12 −15.18 ± 0.30 −14.74 ± 0.19
NGC 5506 −13.81 ± 0.07 ... −14.57 ± 0.11 −14.19 ± 0.08 −14.31 ± 0.09
  −14.12 ± 0.07 −14.74 ± 0.14 −14.00 ± 0.07 −15.82 ± 0.44 −13.74 ± 0.07

Note. aLogarithm of the intensity of the indicated line.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

For the broad-line sources, two complications arise which prevent us from performing the same analysis as for the narrow-line sources. First, greater uncertainties exist in the continuum measurements. Second, the lines cannot be fitted by simple Gaussians with the same widths. While the hydrogen Balmer lines of many of the broad-line sources show asymmetries, we chose to fit both Hα and Hβ with a combination of narrow and broad Gaussians. To ensure the uniform measurements of the lines in our spectra, we used an automated process which focused on fitting lines in a narrow region surrounding both the Hβ and Hα lines, separately.

In the Hβ region, defined as the region from 4600 to 5200 Å, we fit a combination of three narrow Gaussians to [O iii] 5007 Å. The use of three Gaussians allowed us to reproduce the shape more robustly, since this line often shows extended wings. The narrow-line shapes, particularly the widths of these lines, were applied to the narrow He ii 4686 Å, Hβ 4861 Å, and [O iii] 4959 Å lines. Both the flux and velocity offsets of each line were allowed to vary. The continuum was fitted with a linear function in a region unaffected by the prominent lines. Finally, these fitted narrow components were combined with a broad Hβ line, which was modeled with a single broad Gaussian component, and re-fitted. The use of essentially a narrow and broad Gaussian allows us to estimate the flux and width of each component, important in estimating the black hole mass (based on the FWHM in the broad component) and emission-line ratios (which depend on the ratio of the narrow lines). Results of these fits are included in Table 9, including the measured continuum flux at 5100 Å. The recorded values of FWHM for the narrow component apply to the strongest narrow-line component of the three Gaussians used to fit the [O iii] 5007 Å line.

Table 9. Emission-line Properties For Strong Blue Lines (Broad-line Sources)

Source FWHM (km s−1) Na [O iii] λ4959a [O iii] λ5007a B FWHM (km s−1) Ba F5100 Å
KPNO spectra
3C 111 214.6 ± 0.4 −12.70 −11.97 −11.54 4960.5 ± 1.6 −11.55 −13.90 ± 0.05
MCG −01-13-025 656.3 ± 666.1 −13.76 −13.32 −13.02 8162.8 ± 288.6 −13.11 ± 0.01 −14.63 ± 0.02
1RXS J045205.0+493248 374.1 ± 4.8 −13.01 ± 0.01 −12.48 ± 0.01 −12.04 ± 0.01 7402.1 ± 21.7 −12.36 −14.33 ± 0.01
MCG +08-11-011 986.1 ± 20.5 −12.15 ± 0.07 −11.71 ± 0.07 −11.24 ± 0.07 3762.3 ± 28.6 −11.61 −13.60 ± 0.02
IRAS 05589+2828 563.2 ± 33.5 −12.87 ± 0.33 −12.81 ± 0.33 −12.36 ± 0.33 5564.9 ± 15.1 −12.34 −14.40 ± 0.01
Mkn 6 750.1 ± 212.0 −12.41 ± 0.53 −11.97 −11.52 ± 0.00 4757.8 ± 69.5 −12.19 ± 0.01 −13.89 ± 0.02
Mkn 79 1078.6 ± 96.9 −13.11 ± 0.04 −12.56 ± 0.02 −12.09 ± 0.02 3940.9 ± 54.4 −12.55 ± 0.01 −14.66 ± 0.03
MCG +04-22-042 1486.6 −12.72 ± 0.20 −12.73 ± 0.20 −12.26 ± 0.20 2951.4 ± 62.5 −12.43 ± 0.01 −14.49 ± 0.02
NGC 3227 1445.1 −12.67 ± 0.57 −12.11 −11.64 3737.2 ± 61.2 −12.17 ± 0.01 −13.98 ± 0.01
NGC 3516 315.4 ± 57.7 −13.53 −12.48 −12.04 5294.9 ± 100.3 −12.18 ± 0.01 −13.88 ± 0.01
UGC 6728 327.9 ± 612.0 −12.80 −13.13 −12.75 2308.3 ± 79.6 −12.68 ± 0.02 −14.47 ± 0.01
NGC 4051 1445.1 −12.52 ± 0.18 −12.36 ± 0.18 −11.87 ± 0.18 1498.9 ± 35.3 −12.29 ± 0.02 −14.05 ± 0.01
NGC 4151 626.3 ± 26.5 −11.40 ± 0.08 −11.00 −10.51 2653.5   −13.41 ± 0.04
Mkn 766 939.1 ± 24.5 −12.66 ± 0.02 −12.26 ± 0.02 −11.78 ± 0.02 2422.6 ± 59.0 −12.68 ± 0.01 −14.43 ± 0.02
NGC 4593 1486.6 −13.12 ± 0.55 −12.71 ± 0.54 −12.48 ± 0.54 5966.3 ± 390.7 −12.40 ± 0.04 −14.15 ± 0.01
MCG +09-21-096 485.5 ± 351.2 −13.87 ± 0.00 −13.51 −13.06 ± 0.00 5412.3 ± 115.8 −12.93 ± 0.01 −14.94 ± 0.01
Mkn 813 1486.6 −13.82 ± 0.25 −13.51 ± 0.24 −13.15 ± 0.24 7072.1 ± 207.9 −12.98 ± 0.01 −14.94 ± 0.01
Mkn 841 1486.6 −13.23 ± 0.96 −12.68 −12.24 ± 0.00 4957.7 ± 87.3 −12.47 ± 0.01 −14.61 ± 0.02
1RXS J174538.1+290823 1001.7 ± 36.4 −13.71 ± 0.03 −13.19 ± 0.03 −12.75 ± 0.03 9998.0 −13.68 ± 0.01 −15.52 ± 0.02
3C 382 361.6 ± 259.8 0.00 −14.63 ± 0.76 −14.19 ± 0.84 9998.0 −14.02 ± 0.08 −15.62 ± 0.02
NVSS J193013+341047 1366.4 ± 579.9 −13.43 ± 0.74 −12.81 ± 0.74 −12.35 4999.5 ± 204.5 −13.32 ± 0.02 −15.17 ± 0.30
1RXS J193347.6+325422 157.4 ± 36.0 −13.08 −12.93 ± 0.98 −12.40 ± 0.99 3979.2 ± 32.3 −12.36 −14.51 ± 0.04
4C+74.26 1428.6 ± 814.2 −13.39 ± 0.20 −12.66 ± 0.17 −12.31 ± 0.17 9099.9 ± 108.5 −11.90 −13.80
IGR 21247+5058 734.2 ± 356.9 −14.22 ± 0.41 −13.93 ± 0.41 −13.40 ± 0.41 2322.7 ± 162.1 −13.66 ± 0.04 −15.72 ± 0.02
RX J2135.9+4728 1486.6 −14.58 ± 0.74 −14.05 ± 0.74 −13.54 ± 0.74 5047.7 ± 385.9 −14.11 ± 0.03 −15.71 ± 0.01
SDSS spectra
Mkn 1018 693.8 ± 100.3 −13.91 ± 0.09 −13.39 ± 0.09 −12.91 ± 0.09 5857.6 ± 130.7 −13.19 ± 0.01 −14.64 ± 0.01
Mkn 590 779.9 ± 137.8 −13.59 ± 0.04 −12.91 ± 0.04 −12.46 ± 0.04 5402.8 ± 130.3 −13.40 ± 0.01 −14.70 ± 0.01
SDSS J090432.19+553830.1 200.2 ± 5.8 −13.52 ± 0.03 −13.35 ± 0.03 −12.87 ± 0.03 5694.8 ± 44.1 −13.25 −15.15 ± 0.01
MCG +04-22-042 318.7 ± 7.3 −12.56 ± 0.01 −12.67 ± 0.01 −12.21 ± 0.01 3780.2 ± 23.5 −12.41 −14.41 ± 0.02
Mkn 110 483.3 ± 11.50 −13.09 ± 0.19 −12.64 ± 0.19 −12.17 ± 0.19 3332.8 ± 21.1 −13.21 −15.28 ± 0.03
SBS 1136+594 1498.1 −13.45 ± 0.02 −12.87 ± 0.01 −12.39 3955.4 ± 24.9 −12.76 −14.79 ± 0.01
NGC 5548 247.1 ± 15.1 −12.74 ± 0.02 −12.14 ± 0.02 −11.69 ± 0.02 7736.2 ± 76.3 −12.45 −14.39 ± 0.01
Mkn 290 659.8 ± 24.0 −13.18 ± 0.58 −12.60 ± 0.58 −12.13 4343.8 ± 37.0 −12.61 −14.54 ± 0.02
Mkn 926 1331.7 ± 30.3 −13.05 ± 0.01 −12.53 ± 0.01 −12.05 ± 0.01 6993.6 ± 93.4 −13.11 ± 0.01 −14.83 ± 0.01

Note. aThe logarithm of the indicated lines are given in erg s−1 cm−2, where HβN indicates the narrow component of Hβ and HβB indicates the broad component. The limits on the velocity offsets of the lines were ±1000 km s−1. Where error bars are not listed, they are on the order of 10−3.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

In the Hα region, defined as the region from 6200 to 6900 Å, we used the narrow [O i] 6300 Å line to define the initial guess for the velocity offset of the measured lines and the set FWHM of a single Gaussian component. The offset velocities and fluxes of the remaining narrow Hα line, [N ii] lines, and [S ii] lines were allowed to vary. However, the intensities of the [N ii] lines are fixed such that the λ6548 line is at a 1:2.98 ratio with the λ6584 line. A linear continuum was fitted in a region unaffected by the emission lines. The narrow lines were added to a single broad Gaussian for broad Hα and re-fitted. Results from these fits are recorded in Table 10. Examples of fits to both the Hβ and Hα regions are shown in Figure 5. The largest uncertainties involved in these fits are associated with the measurements of Hα and the two [N ii] lines, which are blended in our broad-line spectra, particularly for a source such as MCG +04-22-042.

Figure 5.

Figure 5. Fits to the Hβ and Hα regions of the broad-line spectra of SDSS J090432.19+553830.1 (top), Mkn 841 (middle), and MCG +04-22-042 (bottom). The narrow components are shown in blue, while the total fit (broad + narrow lines) is shown in red.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 10. Emission-line Properties For Strong Red Lines (Broad-line Sources)

Source FWHM (km s−1) Na [N ii] λ6583a [S ii] λ6716a [S ii] λ6731a B FWHM (km s−1) Ba
KPNO spectra
3C111 481.1 ± 2.4 −12.14 −12.81 −12.93 −12.98 4589.8 ± 0.5 −11.23
MCG -01-13-025 888.8 ± 70.9 −13.21 ± 0.01 −13.20 −13.58 ± 0.03 −13.48 ± 0.02 6381.7 ± 27.7 −12.55
1RXS J045205.0+493248 310.2 ± 2.0 −12.48 −12.68 −13.08 −13.09 5706.2 ± 2.1 −11.88
MCG +08-11-011 766.1 ± 19.6 −11.51 −11.60 −12.35 −12.19 4214.3 ± 9.3 −11.20
IRAS 05589+2828 785.1 ± 67.6 −12.49 −12.85 −13.85 ± 0.02 −13.86 ± 0.03 5416.2 ± 7.1 −12.11
Mkn 6 848.2 ± 25.5 −11.97 −12.26 −12.60 −12.45 6800.9 ± 15.1 −11.51
Mkn 79 395.5 ± 38.5 −12.66 −12.74 −13.36 ± 0.01 −13.45 ± 0.01 3660.3 ± 5.5 −12.08
MCG +04-22-042 365.4 ± 30.9 −12.57 −13.84 −13.48 −13.54 2328.1 ± 3.1 −11.90
NGC 3227 601.4 ± 26.7 −12.04 ± 0.01 −11.93 −12.55 ± 0.01 −12.55 ± 0.01 3452.9 ± 16.4 −11.73
NGC 3516 528.1 ± 182.4 −12.46 ± 0.59 −11.27 ± 0.93 −13.62 ± 0.97 −13.70 ± 0.97 4418.8 ± 11.2 −11.56
UGC 6728 207.2 ± 55.8 −12.34 0.00 −13.92 −13.88 1288.1 ± 1.7 −12.00
NGC 4051 227.5 ± 42.5 −11.97 −12.59 −12.91 −12.93 1627.3 ± 8.3 −11.80
NGC 4151 488.3 ± 5.8 −11.12 −11.22 −11.80 −11.73 4745.8 ± 7.8 −11.06
Mkn 766 511.1 ± 35.8 −12.10 ± 0.04 −12.46 ± 0.04 −13.17 ± 0.05 −13.15 ± 0.05 2327.3 ± 13.2 −12.17 ± 0.01
NGC 4593 427.8 ± 198.5 −13.34 ± 0.71 −13.17 ± 0.71 −13.28 ± 0.71 −13.27 ± 0.71 8259.5 ± 62.3 −12.41
MCG +09-21-096 394.0 ± 39.5 −13.54 ± 0.07 0.00 −13.79 ± 0.07 −13.83 ± 0.07 5104.7 ± 15.8 −12.42
Mkn 813 0.0 −13.77 ± 0.03 0.00 −14.39 ± 0.06 −14.35 ± 0.06 6495.0 ± 21.9 −12.50
Mkn 841 120.2 ± 19.6 −12.8 −13.20 −13.41 ± 0.01 −13.55 ± 0.01 4190.3 ± 7.8 −12.12
1RXS J174538.1+290823 590.2 ± 72.2 −14.46 ± 0.19 −14.22 ± 0.19 −13.83 ± 0.05 −14.07 ± 0.07 7303.9 ± 48.7 −12.93
3C382 0.0 −15.34 ± 0.79 −15.01 ± 0.77 −15.01 ± 0.77 −15.14 ± 0.78 1315.8 ± 996.1 −14.84 ± 0.21
NVSS J193013+341047 624.9 ± 28.4 −12.87 ± 0.02 −13.15 ± 0.02 −13.71b −13.79b 5282.8 ± 15.7 −12.50
1RXS J193347.6+325422 789.8 ± 23.9 −12.11 ± 0.83 −12.36 ± 0.83 −14.09 ± 0.94 −14.39 ± 0.93 3269.9 ± 3.5 −11.97
4C+74.26 1486.6 ± 0.0 −12.83 ± 0.01 −12.56 −13.25 ± 0.13 −13.24 ± 0.12 9998.0 −11.44
IGR 21247+5058 295.1 ± 292.0 −13.28 ± 0.99 0.00 −14.62 ± 0.99 −14.69 ± 0.99 2122.0 ± 9.0 −12.69
RX J2135.9+4728 620.0 ± 99.8 −13.59 ± 0.17 −13.72 ± 0.17 −14.53 ± 0.17 −14.58 ± 0.18 4475.1 ± 33.2 −13.19
SDSS spectra
Mkn 1018 457.0 ± 69.7 −13.46 ± 0.20 −13.24 ± 0.20 −13.87 ± 0.20 −13.91 ± 0.20 4847.3 ± 28.2 −12.67
Mkn 590 566.0 ± 22.7 −13.00 −12.99b −13.76b −13.75b 6850.3 ± 43.0 −12.79
SDSS J090432.19+553830.1 342.8 ± 12.7 −12.95 −13.25 −13.71 −13.77 5190.9 ± 10.4 −12.71
MCG +04-22-042 354.1 ± 21.4 −12.21 ± 0.01 −12.81 −13.36 ± 0.01 −13.42 ± 0.01 3059.7 ± 8.0 −11.94
Mkn 110 362.1 ± 3.2 −12.47 −13.05 −13.41 −13.46 3069.7 ± 6.8 −12.47
SBS 1136+594 245.6 ± 10.0 −12.92 −14.06 −13.84 −13.92 3846.5 ± 8.7 −12.35
NGC 5548 587.4 ± 14.3 −12.37b −12.61b −13.07b −13.13b 6736.0 ± 18.5 −11.92
Mkn 290 349.2 ± 24.1 −12.70 ± 0.01 −13.11 −13.59 ± 0.01 −13.65 ± 0.01 4480.0 ± 13.9 −12.21
Mkn 926 529.8 ± 6.6 −12.68 −12.75b −13.14b −13.14b 8292.8 ± 20.3 −12.33

Notes. aThe logarithm of the indicated lines are given in erg s−1 cm−2, where HαN indicates the narrow component of Hα and HαB indicates the broad component. The [N ii] λ6548 line, not shown in the table, was fixed to a ratio of 1:2.98 with [N ii] λ6583. Where error bars are not included, they are on the order of 10−3. bThe indicated value is a lower limit.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

Additionally, weaker lines that are also present in the spectra were measured by manually selecting a continuum region surrounding the selected emission feature. The fluxes of each of these measured lines are included in Table 11. Where broad lines were present and clearly separable from a narrow component, the indicated flux is for the narrow component.

Table 11. Emission-line Properties For Weaker Narrow Lines (Broad-line Sources)

Source [O ii] λ3727a [Ne iii] λ3869a [Ne iii] λ3968a Hδ 4101a Hγ 4340a [O iii] λ4363a He ii λ4686a
  [N i] λ5199a He i λ5876a [Fe vii] λ6087a [O i] λ6300a [O i] λ6363a [Fe x] λ6375a [Ar iii] λ7136a
KPNO spectra
LEDA 138501 −13.86 ± 0.08 −13.57 ± 0.08 −13.66 ± 0.12 −12.76 ± 0.10 −13.39 ± 0.06 −13.36 ± 0.05 −13.96 ± 0.09
  ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
3C 111 ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
  ... ... −12.85 ± 0.14 −13.01 ± 0.17 −13.78 ± 0.18 ...  
MCG −01-13-025 −13.23 ± 0.17 ... ... ... ...  ⋅⋅⋅   ⋅⋅⋅ ...
  −14.44 ± 0.19 ... ... −13.49 ± 0.05 −13.74 ± 0.05 ... ...
1RXS J045205.0+493248 −12.37 ± 0.07 −12.59 ± 0.12 ... ... −13.19 ± 0.10 −12.48 ± 0.08 −14.12 ± 0.18
  −14.46 ± 0.09 ... ... −13.05 ± 0.04 −13.60 ± 0.07 ... −14.21 ± 0.07
MCG +08-11-011 ... ... ... ... −11.61 ± 0.03 −12.40 ± 0.05 −13.03 ± 0.06
  −13.32 ± 0.08 −12.32 ± 0.04 −13.32 ± 0.10 −12.41 ± 0.04 −12.69 ± 0.05 ... −13.13 ± 0.10
IRAS 05589+2828 ... ... ... ... −12.49 ± 0.10 −12.84 ± 0.15 −13.58 ± 0.06
  ... −14.00 ± 0.03 ... −14.15 ± 0.06 −14.08 ± 0.07 −15.83 ± 0.18 ...
Mkn 6 ... ... ... ... −12.49 ± 0.09 −13.00 ± 0.11 −13.66 ± 0.10
  −14.19 ± 0.09 ... ... −12.61 ± 0.05 −13.39 ± 0.10 ... −13.92 ± 0.15
Mkn 79 −12.87 ± 0.11 −12.97 ± 0.14 −13.11 ± 0.23 −12.63 ± 0.21 −12.72 ± 0.07 −13.02 ± 0.09 −13.36 ± 0.11
  −14.25 ± 0.19 −13.77 ± 0.06 −13.71 ± 0.05 −13.41 ± 0.03 −13.87 ± 0.06 −13.87 ± 0.05 −13.86 ± 0.08
MCG +04-22-042 −12.95 ± 0.10 −13.06 ± 0.10 −12.79 ± 0.12 −12.35 ± 0.11 −12.29 ± 0.06 −12.90 ± 0.08 −12.59 ± 0.07
  ... −12.77 ± 0.04 −13.74 ± 0.05 −13.76 ± 0.05 −13.46 ± 0.06 ... −14.32 ± 0.08
NGC 3227 ... ... ... ... −12.19 ± 0.06 −13.01 ± 0.09 −13.69 ± 0.11
  −13.79 ± 0.07 ... ... −12.66 ± 0.04 −12.87 ± 0.07 ... −12.98 ± 0.08
NGC 3516 ... ... ... ... −12.07 ± 0.12  ⋅⋅⋅   ⋅⋅⋅ ...
  ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
UGC 6728 −13.35 ± 0.15 −13.49 ± 0.14 −13.13 ± 0.15 −12.88 ± 0.13 −12.64 ± 0.08 −13.43 ± 0.12 −13.36 ± 0.11
  ... −13.42 ± 0.07 ... −14.02 ± 0.04 −14.65 ± 0.07 ... ...
NGC 4051 ... ... ... ... −12.54 ± 0.11 −13.41 ± 0.17 −13.55 ± 0.10
  ... −13.18 ± 0.07 −13.75 ± 0.08 −13.05 ± 0.06 −12.93 ± 0.07 ... −14.04 ± 0.06
NGC 4151 ... ... ... ... −11.64 ± 0.06 −11.86 ± 0.06 −12.60 ± 0.07
  −12.63 ± 0.06 −12.35 ± 0.08 −12.22 ± 0.06 −11.67 ± 0.03 −12.04 ± 0.05 ... −12.17 ± 0.03
Mkn 766 ... ... ... ... −13.06 ± 0.14  ⋅⋅⋅   ⋅⋅⋅ −13.92 ± 0.10
  ... −13.37 ± 0.09 −13.83 ± 0.10 −13.42 ± 0.08 −13.58 ± 0.12 ... −13.90 ± 0.06
NGC 4593 −12.85 ± 0.15 −12.99 ± 0.14 ... −12.26 ± 0.21 −12.21 ± 0.11 −12.55 ± 0.11 ...
  ... −12.10 ± 0.08 −13.10 ± 0.12 −13.75 ± 0.08 −13.31 ± 0.07 ... ...
MCG +09-21-096 −13.23 ± 0.07 −13.64 ± 0.12 ... ... −13.35 ± 0.15 −12.69 ± 0.12 ...
  ... −12.62 ± 0.05 ... −13.88 ± 0.06 −14.14 ± 0.10 ... ...
Mkn 813 −14.39 ± 0.16 −13.69 ± 0.14 −14.33 ± 0.15 −12.88 ± 0.06 −13.23 ± 0.06 −13.50 ± 0.07 −14.62 ± 0.12
  ... −12.54 ± 0.06 ... −13.88 ± 0.05 −14.15 ± 0.10 ... ...
Mkn 841 −13.06 ± 0.08 −13.06 ± 0.09 −13.44 ± 0.15 −12.79 ± 0.15 −13.16 ± 0.08 −12.90 ± 0.08 −13.52 ± 0.11
  −14.35 ± 0.14 −12.52 ± 0.08 −14.23 ± 0.17 −14.30 ± 0.07 ... ... −13.97 ± 0.16
1RXS J174538.1+290823 −13.26 ± 0.06 −13.62 ± 0.09 −14.06 ± 0.09 −14.37 ± 0.13 −13.90 ± 0.10 −13.92 ± 0.10 −14.66 ± 0.09
  −15.11 ± 0.09            
NVSS J193013+341047 −13.10 ± 0.10 −13.18 ± 0.13 −13.63 ± 0.24 −13.79 ± 0.25 −13.59 ± 0.13 −13.37 ± 0.11 −14.03 ± 0.14
  ...            
1RXS J193347.6+325422 ... −12.77 ± 0.13 −12.68 ± 0.12 −12.40 ± 0.10 −12.37 ± 0.04 −12.81 ± 0.05 ...
  −14.68 ± 0.05 −14.63 ± 0.10 −14.81 ± 0.13 −13.75 ± 0.06 −14.41 ± 0.10 ... ...
4C +74.26 ... ... ... ... −11.97 ± 0.07 ... ...
  ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
IGR 21247+5058 ... ... ... −14.01 ± 0.24 −13.87 ± 0.19  ⋅⋅⋅   ⋅⋅⋅ ...
  ... −13.73 ± 0.19 −14.68 ± 0.10 −14.84 ± 0.12 −14.58 ± 0.10 −15.26 ± 0.15 ...
RX J2135.9+4728 ... ... ... ... ...  ⋅⋅⋅   ⋅⋅⋅ −15.26 ± 0.10
  ... −14.61 ± 0.11 −14.09 ± 0.10 −14.72 ± 0.08 −15.48 ± 0.12 −15.65 ± 0.18 ...
SDSS spectra
Mkn 1018 −13.61 ± 0.06 −14.48 ± 0.09 ... ... ...  ⋅⋅⋅   ⋅⋅⋅ ...
  ... ... ... −14.57 ± 0.08 ... ... ...
Mkn 590 −13.42 ± 0.16 −13.28 ± 0.15 ... ... −13.30 ± 0.18 −13.62 ± 0.13 ...
  ... ... −13.97 ± 0.12 −13.54 ± 0.06 −14.24 ± 0.13 ... −14.53 ± 0.07
SDSS J090432.19+553830.1 −13.23 ± 0.04 −13.87 ± 0.10 ... −14.67 ± 0.09 −14.03 ± 0.06 −13.68 ± 0.09 −14.91 ± 0.08
  −15.35 ± 0.12 −14.17 ± 0.10 ... −14.16 ± 0.05 −14.66 ± 0.10 ... −14.88 ± 0.07
MCG +04-22-042 −13.01 ± 0.02 −12.99 ± 0.08 −12.68 ± 0.11 −12.25 ± 0.06 −12.25 ± 0.05 −12.88 ± 0.07 −13.55 ± 0.12
  ... −12.63 ± 0.06 −13.58 ± 0.07 −13.76 ± 0.06 −14.89 ± 0.12 −13.51 ± 0.07 −14.51 ± 0.07
Mkn 110 −12.87 ± 0.04 −13.16 ± 0.05 −13.42 ± 0.08 −13.53 ± 0.12 −13.29 ± 0.10 −13.24 ± 0.09 −14.03 ± 0.07
  −14.44 ± 0.12 −14.03 ± 0.06 −14.45 ± 0.06 −13.25 ± 0.02 −13.66 ± 0.03 ... −14.28 ± 0.04
SBS 1136+594 −13.17 ± 0.06 −13.32 ± 0.05 −13.46 ± 0.09 −13.84 ± 0.09 −13.48 ± 0.05 −13.02 ± 0.04 −14.02 ± 0.09
  ... −13.11 ± 0.03 −15.07 ± 0.10 −14.05 ± 0.03 −14.55 ± 0.06 −14.68 ± 0.09 −15.09 ± 0.09
NGC 5548 ... −12.50 ± 0.05 −13.05 ± 0.10 −13.43 ± 0.08 −12.91 ± 0.08 −12.67 ± 0.07 −13.57 ± 0.09
  ... −13.59 ± 0.07 −13.17 ± 0.05 −12.98 ± 0.03 −13.52 ± 0.06 ... −14.24 ± 0.06
Mkn 290 −13.35 ± 0.07 −13.14 ± 0.07 −13.42 ± 0.12 −14.09 ± 0.06 −13.72 ± 0.07 −13.45 ± 0.06 −13.86 ± 0.07
  ... −12.66 ± 0.06 −13.87 ± 0.06 −13.85 ± 0.05 −14.47 ± 0.09 −15.02 ± 0.14 −14.62 ± 0.07
Mkn 926 −12.55 ± 0.03 −13.01 ± 0.05 −13.48 ± 0.08 −13.52 ± 0.11 −13.20 ± 0.08 −13.35 ± 0.11 −13.90 ± 0.14
  −13.77 ± 0.07 −14.20 ± 0.10 ... −13.06 ± 0.03 −13.84 ± 0.06 ... −14.22 ± 0.05

Note. aThe logarithm of the flux for each indicated line is given in units of erg s−1 cm−2.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

3.3. Stellar Absorption Features

As an alternate method of determining ages of the host galaxies from the stellar continuum fits, we measure the strength of stellar absorption features directly from the non-galaxy continuum subtracted (both with and without subtraction of the AGN non-thermal component) spectra of our sources. This method is analogous to the work measuring Lick-indices by Worthey & Ottaviani (1997). However, instead of broadening our spectra to the velocity dispersion of the Lick/IDS spectral library (9 Å), we follow the procedure outlined in Kauffmann et al. (2003b) for SDSS spectra, which instead compares the measured indices to the Bruzual & Charlot (2003) stellar models. For further details on the SDSS analysis, along with a comparison of the measured indices with additional high resolution stellar libraries, see the discussion in Kauffmann et al. (2003b).

Two particularly important indicators of the age of a stellar population were used extensively in galaxy studies using SDSS spectra (Kauffmann et al. 2003a, 2003b; Gallazzi et al. 2005; Kewley et al. 2006). These are the 4000 Å break (measured with Dn(4000)) and the equivalent width of Hδ absorption (measured with HδA). Among these, the 4000 Å break, or Ca ii break, is observed as a discontinuity in the optical spectrum, caused mainly by the presence of absorption features from metals below 4000 Å. Since the opacity of metals in young, hot stars is low, this feature is weak in young stellar populations and strong in old populations. As a measurement of the Ca ii break, we use the definition of Balogh et al. (1999) to compute

Equation (1)

While strong Ca ii breaks indicate old populations, strong equivalent widths of Hδ absorption indicate a recent burst of star formation within 0.1–1 Gyr (Worthey & Ottaviani 1997). Therefore, we measure

Equation (2)

where FI is the flux of the line within the bandpass of the feature (4122.25–4083.50) and FC is the flux in a pseudo-continuum. The pseudo-continuum is defined as the line drawn through the average of the flux in the continuum immediately blueward (λλ 4041.60–4079.75) and redward (λλ 4128.50–4161.00) of the Hδ absorption feature.

Half of the spectra show an Hδ emission line (10 narrow-line sources and 16 broad-line sources), while emission from [Ne iii] 3869 Å is often present in the pseudo-continuum from which Dn(4000) is measured. For the narrow-line sources in our sample, we subtracted the measured narrow lines before calculating these age indicators. Such a calculation is not straight forward for the broad-line sources, where broad emission features are often present in the region containing HδA (with Hδ emission) and Dn(4000) (including [Ne iii] + H7 λ3968 Å and Hδ). In Figure 6, we plot examples of spectra for both narrow and broad-line sources, where stellar absorption features are seen.

Figure 6.

Figure 6. Spectra, with errors, in the regions where Dn(4000) and HδA are measured for representative narrow line (top two panels) and broad line (bottom two panels) sources. Absorption lines of Ca ii H and K and Hδ are indicated with dashed lines. For the narrow-line sources, emission lines in the spectra were subtracted.

Standard image High-resolution image

In Figure 7, we plot HδA versus Dn(4000) for our sources, excluding broad-line sources with prominent Hδ emission. We plot the values measured both after subtracting the power-law continuum (Table 6; top plot) and from the original dereddened spectrum (bottom plot). From each of these measurements, the Dn(4000) break does not change appreciably whether or not the power-law component is subtracted, with a median value of 1.26 for narrow-line sources and 0.91 for broad-line sources when the power law is subtracted and 1.41 (narrow) and 0.92 (broad) without the subtraction. The HδA values are affected, however, for the narrow-line sources with median values of 0.81 (narrow) and −2.15 (broad) with the power law subtracted and 1.73 (narrow) and −2.15 (broad) without the subtraction. To test whether any aperture effects influenced our measurements, we plotted each of these diagnostic measurements against redshift. With no correlation in either HδA or Dn(4000) with z, we conclude that there are no obvious aperture effects to be accounted for in our measurements.

Figure 7.

Figure 7. Two age indicators, HδA which measures recent bursts of star formation and Dn(4000) which measures the Ca ii break and is sensitive to old stellar populations. The circles represent narrow-line sources and the triangles represent broad-line sources. In the top plot, we show the values measured after subtracting out the power-law components (Table 6). The bottom plot shows the values measured directly from the spectra. In both plots, the box in the upper left hand corner shows the area where young stellar populations had significant (≳30%) contributions in our test galaxy spectra (see Appendix A, Figure 19).

Standard image High-resolution image

The majority of the narrow-line sources occupy the area expected from our stellar population model tests, discussed in Appendix A and plotted in Figure 19. The broad-line sources, however, occupy a region with considerably lower values of HδA. This is true even for sources where an Hδ emission line is not seen in the spectrum (as for the sources plotted). From visual inspection of the Hδ region of our sources, we find that unlike the narrow-line sources, we cannot clearly identify an Hδ absorption feature in any of the broad-line sources. In most cases, we see emission features that are often broad. The low values of HδA measurements for broad-line sources are therefore a likely effect of emission in this region.

In addition to these stellar age diagnostics, we measured additional absorption indices for common stellar absorption features. These values were measured using the same method as used for the HδA index, first subtracting the emission-line spectra for the narrow-line sources and subtracting the power-law component for all of the sources. Bandpasses and continuum ranges are defined in Worthey et al. (1994) and Worthey & Ottaviani (1997). In Table 12, we present the stellar age indicators (Dn(4000) and HδA) along with six metallicity indicators, chosen to sample indices sensitive to several different elements (i.e., C, N, Ca, Mg, Fe). Two of these indices are combinations of other indices, defined in González (1993):

Equation (3)

We use the modified form of [MgFe]', defined by Thomas et al. (2003) as

Equation (4)

Table 12. Measurements of Intrinsic Stellar Absorption

Source Dn(4000) A (Å) CN1 (mag) Ca 4227 (Å) C2 4668 (Å) Mgb (Å) [MgFe]' (Å) 〈Fe〉 (Å)
KPNO spectra
NGC 788 ... ... ... ... −24.12 ± 0.80 −8.50 ± 0.14 13.61 ± 0.06 −7.05 ± 0.11
LEDA 138501 0.88 ± 0.00 −3.25 ± 0.16 0.11 ± 0.00 0.24 ± 0.09 −2.62 ± 0.19 −0.09 ± 0.12 0.69 ± 0.17 −0.25 ± 0.09
2MASX J03181899+6829322 ... ... −0.52 ± 0.02 −0.36 ± 0.68 −4.64 ± 0.45 2.33 ± 0.30 ... 2.19 ± 0.20
3C 105 ... ... ... ... 3.63 ± 0.48 3.89 ± 0.26 3.66 ± 0.16 3.52 ± 0.18
3C 111 ... ... ... ... 21.49 ± 0.08 −210.88 ± 92.86 ... −98.29 ± 46.43
2MASX J04440903+2813003 ... −0.22 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.04 ± 0.00 −0.21 ± 0.00 −0.14 ± 0.00 0.16 −0.10 ± 0.00
MCG −01-13-025 1.51 ± 0.01 −2.15 ± 0.25 0.09 ± 0.01 1.05 ± 0.12 5.14 ± 0.17 4.21 ± 0.17 4.32 ± 0.09 3.20 ± 0.13
MCG +04-22-042 0.86 ± 0.00 −12.30 ± 0.18 0.21 ± 0.00 0.02 ± 0.09 −10.97 ± 0.20 −1.49 ± 0.33 2.96 ± 0.47 −0.26 ± 0.23
1RXS J045205.0+493248 0.78 ± 0.00 −0.30 ± 0.06 0.12 ± 0.00 −0.28 ± 0.04 0.08 ± 0.09 1.25 ± 0.05 0.30 ± 0.16 1.17 ± 0.04
MCG +08-11-011 ... −10.93 ± 0.83 −0.05 ± 0.01 0.09 ± 0.19 −5.44 ± 0.25 0.71 ± 0.13 ... 0.37 ± 0.09
IRAS 05589+2828 ... ... ... 0.51 ± 0.12 −5.46 ± 0.08 −0.06 ± 0.06 ... 0.07 ± 0.04
Mkn 3 ... ... 0.32 ± 0.23 −3.18 ± 2.17 −7.11 ± 0.84 8.09 ± 0.26 ... 4.24 ± 0.22
2MASX J06411806+3249313 ... ... ... ... −0.09 ± 0.05 −0.12 ± 0.02 0.10 −0.09 ± 0.01
Mkn 6 ... −6.79 ± 1.60 −0.00 ± 0.02 −0.18 ± 0.26 −1.34 ± 0.29 0.88 ± 0.13 ... 0.18 ± 0.10
Mkn 79 0.84 ± 0.01 −14.85 ± 0.30 0.32 ± 0.01 0.48 ± 0.15 −8.12 ± 0.30 1.85 ± 0.43 ... 1.73 ± 0.32
Mkn 18 1.10 ± 0.01 2.14 ± 0.20 −0.02 ± 0.01 0.39 ± 0.10 2.11 ± 0.18 2.15 ± 0.21 2.03 ± 0.11 1.80 ± 0.15
MCG −01-24-012 1.37 ± 0.04 0.09 ± 0.99 −0.03 ± 0.02 1.50 ± 0.36 1.99 ± 0.49 3.66 ± 0.45 2.52 ± 0.22 2.81 ± 0.32
MCG +04-22-042 0.86 ± 0.00 −12.30 ± 0.18 0.21 ± 0.00 0.02 ± 0.09 −10.97 ± 0.20 −1.49 ± 0.33 2.96 ± 0.47 −0.26 ± 0.23
NGC 3227 ... ... ... −0.52 ± 0.38 −3.08 ± 0.37 1.50 ± 0.17 ... 1.20 ± 0.13
Mkn 417 ... ... ... ... −0.41 ± 0.04 −0.26 ± 0.01 0.30 −0.20 ± 0.01
NGC 3516 ... ... −0.18 ± 0.04 −0.32 ± 0.39 2.92 ± 0.34 1.99 ± 0.16 2.40 ± 0.12 1.97 ± 0.12
1RXS J1127166+190914 ... 0.16 ± 0.07 0.01 ± 0.00 −0.08 ± 0.02 −0.03 ± 0.03 −0.16 ± 0.01 0.07 −0.14 ± 0.01
UGC 6728 0.91 ± 0.01 −9.14 ± 0.26 0.16 ± 0.01 0.52 ± 0.12 −8.25 ± 0.24 −1.08 ± 0.28 2.58 ± 0.34 −0.59 ± 0.20
NGC 4051 ... ... ... −0.58 ± 0.47 −2.30 ± 0.44 0.12 ± 0.21 ... 0.71 ± 0.15
Ark 347 1.63 ± 0.04 −3.75 ± 0.62 0.09 ± 0.02 0.13 ± 0.28 5.35 ± 0.36 3.64 ± 0.39 4.25 ± 0.21 3.16 ± 0.28
NGC 4102 ... ... ... 0.44 ± 0.50 1.96 ± 0.44 2.19 ± 0.19 1.97 ± 0.17 1.82 ± 0.14
NGC 4151 ... ... ... −0.33 ± 0.15 −8.56 ± 0.20 2.17 ± 0.09 ... 0.83 ± 0.07
Mkn 766 ... ... 0.16 ± 0.04 −1.20 ± 0.54 −8.12 ± 0.57 −0.34 ± 0.26 0.54 ± 1.56 0.20 ± 0.20
NGC 4593 0.91 ± 0.01 −5.95 ± 0.38 0.17 ± 0.01 −0.32 ± 0.21 −0.38 ± 0.42 1.13 ± 0.63 ... 1.40 ± 0.45
MCG +09-21-096 0.97 ± 0.01 −2.84 ± 0.29 0.03 ± 0.01 0.52 ± 0.17 −3.00 ± 0.31 1.74 ± 0.40 ... 1.39 ± 0.30
Mkn 813 0.86 ± 0.01 −1.16 ± 0.26 0.06 ± 0.01 0.17 ± 0.14 0.93 ± 0.33 0.37 ± 0.45 0.43 ± 0.42 0.07 ± 0.36
Mkn 841 0.83 ± 0.00 −6.04 ± 0.27 0.19 ± 0.01 −0.07 ± 0.17 −5.94 ± 0.29 0.54 ± 0.50 ... 0.60 ± 0.36
Mkn 1498 0.92 ± 0.02 −9.97 ± 0.72 0.20 ± 0.02 0.26 ± 0.34 −7.18 ± 0.61 2.34 ± 0.72 ... 1.70 ± 0.63
NGC 6240 1.40 ± 0.06 −0.85 ± 1.18 0.04 ± 0.03 1.10 ± 0.58 2.55 ± 0.72 6.07 ± 0.76 3.39 ± 0.32 3.26 ± 0.57
1RXS J174538.1+290823 0.79 ± 0.01 −3.20 ± 0.32 0.15 ± 0.01 0.18 ± 0.17 3.18 ± 0.38 0.59 ± 0.31 0.86 ± 0.47 −0.05 ± 0.25
3C 382 1.11 ± 0.04 −0.99 ± 1.56 0.09 ± 0.05 −0.88 ± 0.86 2.24 ± 1.15 1.45 ± 1.65 1.33 ± 1.30 0.28 ± 1.79
NVSS J193013+341047 0.51 ± 0.03 −28.46 ± 3.36 0.38 ± 0.08 3.40 ± 1.29 −19.33 ± 2.24 −2.59 ± 1.76 9.52 ± 1.61 −6.34 ± 1.97
1RXS J193347.6+325422 0.84 ± 0.00 −6.62 ± 0.09 0.19 ± 0.00 −0.12 ± 0.05 −2.95 ± 0.30 0.06 ± 0.16 ... −0.01 ± 0.16
3C 403 0.72 ± 0.02 3.35 ± 1.19 −0.25 ± 0.03 0.55 ± 0.68 −14.05 ± 3.19 −22.14 ± 1.97 17.25 ± 1.38 −20.44 ± 5.88
Cygnus A 0.95 ± 0.03 −5.58 ± 1.22 0.14 ± 0.04 −0.68 ± 0.58 −4.52 ± 0.72 10.01 ± 0.86 ... 5.46 ± 1.58
MCG +04-48-002 1.14 ± 0.01 4.75 ± 0.31 −0.09 ± 0.01 0.39 ± 0.14 1.65 ± 0.22 2.44 ± 0.12 1.89 ± 0.10 1.93 ± 0.09
4C +74.26 0.86 ± 0.00 −0.75 ± 0.04 0.05 ± 0.00 0.11 ± 0.03 1.14 ± 0.06 −0.14 ± 0.20 ... −0.20 ± 0.15
IGR 21247+5058 1.02 ± 0.01 1.02 ± 0.26 −0.01 ± 0.01 0.11 ± 0.12 1.12 ± 0.19 0.10 ± 0.15 0.21 ± 0.33 −0.01 ± 0.11
RX J2135.9+4728 ... ... 0.35 ± 0.90 2.56 ± 5.61 −1.30 ± 1.42 0.59 ± 0.99 ... 0.97 ± 0.56
UGC 11871 1.08 ± 0.00 −0.75 ± 0.06 0.01 ± 0.00 −0.07 ± 0.03 −0.03 ± 0.05 −0.41 ± 0.13 0.11 −0.28 ± 0.09
NGC 7319 1.03 ± 0.01 0.40 ± 0.19 −0.02 ± 0.01 0.07 ± 0.09 −0.52 ± 0.14 −0.71 ± 0.14 0.55 −0.47 ± 0.10
3C 452 ... ... ... ... 5.30 ± 0.54 1.20 ± 0.41 2.83 ± 0.31 1.75 ± 0.26
SDSS spectra
Mkn 1018 0.96 ± 0.00 −1.92 ± 0.12 0.05 ± 0.00 0.33 ± 0.07 1.93 ± 0.18 1.98 ± 0.11 1.86 ± 0.08 1.65 ± 0.09
Mkn 590 1.17 ± 0.00 −3.76 ± 0.13 0.17 ± 0.00 0.88 ± 0.06 5.25 ± 0.16 3.77 ± 0.10 4.20 ± 0.06 3.05 ± 0.07
Mkn 18 1.20 ± 0.00 3.08 ± 0.16 −0.03 ± 0.00 0.58 ± 0.09 2.64 ± 0.22 2.11 ± 0.13 2.32 ± 0.09 1.98 ± 0.10
SDSS J090432.19+553830.1 0.88 ± 0.00 −4.24 ± 0.20 0.15 ± 0.01 0.59 ± 0.11 0.98 ± 0.27 2.43 ± 0.18 1.50 ± 0.14 2.19 ± 0.14
SDSS J091129.97+452806.0 0.99 ± 0.00 −0.30 ± 0.05 0.01 ± 0.00 −0.13 ± 0.03 −0.72 ± 0.06 −0.39 ± 0.03 0.53 −0.38 ± 0.02
SDSS J091800.25+042506.2 1.52 ± 0.02 0.32 ± 0.47 0.06 ± 0.01 0.69 ± 0.27 4.51 ± 0.48 4.55 ± 0.28 4.22 ± 0.16 3.46 ± 0.20
MCG +04-22-042 0.78 ± 0.00 −11.76 ± 0.12 0.21 ± 0.00 −0.30 ± 0.06 −9.96 ± 0.18 −1.13 ± 0.11 2.33 ± 0.19 −0.09 ± 0.08
Mkn 110 0.72 ± 0.00 −15.51 ± 0.21 0.34 ± 0.01 0.47 ± 0.10 −8.30 ± 0.26 0.60 ± 0.14 0.54 ± 0.87 −0.53 ± 0.11
Mkn 417 1.69 ± 0.02 0.64 ± 0.28 0.05 ± 0.01 1.22 ± 0.14 7.15 ± 0.27 5.53 ± 0.17 5.88 ± 0.09 4.30 ± 0.12
SBS 1136+594 0.85 ± 0.00 −6.08 ± 0.13 0.15 ± 0.00 0.13 ± 0.07 −9.36 ± 0.20 −0.48 ± 0.12 2.00 ± 0.24 −0.39 ± 0.11
CGCG 041-020 1.48 ± 0.01 0.91 ± 0.25 −0.02 ± 0.01 1.08 ± 0.13 5.05 ± 0.27 3.36 ± 0.16 3.99 ± 0.10 2.98 ± 0.12
Ark 347 2.24 ± 0.02 −1.51 ± 0.27 0.11 ± 0.01 1.33 ± 0.12 7.42 ± 0.24 4.86 ± 0.14 5.79 ± 0.08 4.27 ± 0.10
NGC 4388 1.11 ± 0.01 2.97 ± 0.35 0.07 ± 0.01 −2.10 ± 0.19 −3.03 ± 0.38 3.83 ± 0.18 ... 2.41 ± 0.13
NGC 4395 0.92 ± 0.01 4.20 ± 0.33 0.08 ± 0.01 −0.19 ± 0.17 −10.31 ± 0.46 1.10 ± 0.22 ... 0.08 ± 0.17
NGC 4992 −1.25 ± 0.51 4.54 ... ... ... ... ... ...
NGC 5252 2.06 ± 0.02 −0.14 ± 0.27 0.13 ± 0.01 1.48 ± 0.13 7.47 ± 0.26 5.85 ± 0.15 6.05 ± 0.09 4.14 ± 0.12
NGC 5506 1.27 ± 0.01 −1.54 ± 0.14 0.18 ± 0.01 −0.54 ± 0.15 −4.09 ± 0.32 3.11 ± 0.15 ... 1.17 ± 0.12
NGC 5548 0.80 ± 0.00 −1.42 ± 0.17 0.14 ± 0.01 0.47 ± 0.10 −2.45 ± 0.26 2.63 ± 0.16 ... 0.95 ± 0.12
Mkn 290 0.86 ± 0.00 −3.98 ± 0.14 0.11 ± 0.00 0.16 ± 0.08 −4.78 ± 0.21 0.06 ± 0.13 ... 0.19 ± 0.10
Mkn 926 0.79 ± 0.00 −4.54 ± 0.16 0.25 ± 0.00 0.18 ± 0.09 2.80 ± 0.24 5.02 ± 0.14 3.26 ± 0.09 2.85 ± 0.12

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

Additionally, to better understand our results, we also measured these stellar absorption indices for a sample of test spectra created from the stellar population models used for the continuum fits. We discuss these results, where we used different combinations of stellar ages and metallicities, in Appendix A. Of the additional stellar absorption indices recorded in Table 12, Hδ emission could affect the value measured for CN1. Additionally, He ii 4686 Å is within the range of C2 4668 and [N i] 5199 Å is within the range of Mgb. Since [N i] 5199 Å is weak in our broad-line sources, we expect little error in our Mgb measurements. In Figure 8, we plot various metallicity indicators and the age indicator Dn(4000) versus the metallicity indicator Mgb for our target sources. Comparing with our results from the test spectra, it appears that C2 4668 is the most affected by "contaminating" emission features. The narrow-line sources should be unaffected, however, since we have subtracted the emission components from their spectra.

Figure 8.

Figure 8. Selection of stellar absorption indices indicating stellar age (Dn(4000)) or metallicity of the populations vs. the metallicity indicator Mgb. The circles represent narrow-line sources and the triangles represent broad-line sources. In the top left plot, we show a line representing the division in Dn(4000) between populations with a significant contribution from young stars (≳30%), as determined in Figure 19.

Standard image High-resolution image

Based on a comparison of the plots in Figure 8 with the test spectra values, we find that the [MgFe]' versus Mgb and 〈Fe〉 versus Mgb plots are the best indicators of the metallicity of the stellar populations. However, the only clear result is that we do not find old, high-metallicity (2.5 Z) populations within our sample (all of the old population test spectra have Mgb ≲2, as determined from the Dn(4000) versus Mgb plot). Since there is little difference in the parameter space occupied by solar and low-metallicity populations, we cannot discern anything more from our measured stellar absorption indices.

4. EMISSION-LINE CLASSIFICATION

Emission-line diagnostic plots, utilizing the optical line ratios of [O iii] λ5007/Hβ, [N ii] λ6583/Hα, [S ii] λλ6716, 6731/Hα, [O iii] λ5007/[O ii] λ3727, and [O i] λ6300/Hα, are an empirical method of separating Seyferts, LINERs, and star-forming galaxies (Baldwin et al. 1981; Veilleux & Osterbrock 1987). The chosen line ratios (1) have small wavelength separations, so that the effects of reddening are minimal, and (2) distinguish between photoionization from O and B stars (H ii objects) and a non-thermal power-law continuum (AGNs). In order to construct these diagnostic diagrams for our Swift BAT AGNs, we first corrected the line ratios for reddening.

To correct our line ratios for extinction, we use the line ratio of the strongest narrow Balmer lines (Hα/Hβ) along with the Cardelli et al. (1989) reddening curve. The effect of reddening is represented as

Equation (5)

where I(λ) is the intrinsic flux, F(λ) is the observed flux, and f(λ) is from the reddening curve. We assume an intrinsic Hα/Hβ ratio ($\frac{I({\rm H}\alpha)}{I({\rm H}\beta)}$) of 3.1 for our sources, assuming that they are dominated by the underlying AGN. Additionally, we assume that RV = 3.1 and therefore E(BV) = (2.5/3.1)c. For 11 of the spectra from KPNO or SDSS, we find that the ratio of Hα/Hβ is less than the assumed intrinsic value, for which we do not apply a reddening correction [E(BV) = 0]. The corrected line ratios, along with values found in the literature for an additional 13 sources, are shown in Table 13.

Table 13. Dereddened Emission-line Properties

Sourcea Hα/Hβ E(BV)int [O iii]/Hβ [O i]/Hα [N ii]/Hα [S ii]/Hα [O iii]/[O ii]
KPNO spectra
NGC 788 0.55 ... 2.08 0.81 1.33 1.87 ...
2MASX J03181899+6829322 2.70 ... 7.92 0.09 0.43 0.61 ...
3C 105 7.69 0.92 17.07 0.11 0.77 0.39 ...
3C 111 (B) 3.60 0.15 14.01 0.10 0.19 0.27 ...
2MASX J04440903+2813003 6.67 0.77 3.63 −0.07 0.68 0.48 ...
MCG −01-13-025 (B) 3.50 0.12 5.38 0.43 0.93 0.86 1.39
1RXS J045205.0+493248 (B) 3.43 0.10 9.22 0.17 0.57 0.45 1.89
MCG +08-11-011(B) 4.38 0.35 7.72 0.07 0.59 0.25 ...
IRAS 05589+2828 (B) 2.42 ... 3.26 0.01 0.43 0.09 ...
Mkn 3 6.67 0.77 13.37 0.13 0.61 0.30 ...
2MASX J06411806+3249313 3.12 0.01 11.39 0.24 0.40 0.48 ...
Mkn 6 (B) 2.74 ... 7.82 0.17 0.51 0.57 ...
Mkn 79 (B) 2.80 ... 10.58 0.08 0.83 0.36 6.10
Mkn 18 1.82 ... 1.25 0.10 0.45 0.37 0.39
MCG −01-24-012 2.08 ... 4.21 0.19 0.67 0.51 3.16
MCG +04-22-042 (B) 1.42 ... 2.89 0.02 0.05 0.23 5.57
NGC 3227 (B) 4.21 0.31 10.19 0.13 1.00 0.46 ...
Mkn 417 3.70 0.18 7.13 0.20 0.71 0.53 ...
NGC 3516 (B) 11.66 1.34 25.72 ... 4.81 0.04 ...
1RXS J1127166+190914 2.44 ... 9.73 0.25 0.86 0.58 ...
UGC 6728 (B) 2.89 ... 1.13 0.01 ... 0.06 3.96
NGC 4051 (B) 3.50 0.12 4.35 0.07 0.22 0.20 ...
Ark 347 1.69 ... 6.10 0.25 1.11 1.08 6.43
NGC 4102 3.45 0.11 1.33 0.08 0.85 0.28 ...
NGC 4151 (B) 1.90 ... 7.70 0.18 0.80 0.46 ...
Mkn 766 (B) 3.67 0.17 7.45 0.04 0.37 0.15 ...
NGC 4593 (B) 0.60 ... 4.33 0.39 1.46 2.30 2.33
MCG +09-21-096 (B) 2.14 ... 6.57 0.38 ... 1.08 1.49
Mkn 813(B) 1.13 ... 4.74 0.07 ... 0.50 17.55
Mkn 841 (B) 2.99 ... 9.86 0.09 0.36 ... 6.67
Mkn 1498 0.74 ... 4.21 0.05 0.26 0.25 4.99
NGC 6240 9.09 1.09 1.59 0.12 0.39 0.32 0.16
1RXS J174538.1+290823 (B) 0.18 ... 9.23 0.33 1.73 6.72 3.28
3C 382 (B) ... ... ... 0.41 2.13 3.70 ...
NVSS J193013+341047 (B) 3.63 0.16 11.74 0.09 0.46 0.23 4.72
1RXS J193347.6+325422 (B) 9.33 1.11 4.16 ... 0.21 0.01 ...
3C 403 3.12 0.01 11.52 0.16 0.95 0.59 17.40
Cygnus A 3.70 0.18 9.70 0.23 1.51 0.79 2.20
MCG +04-48-002 1.67 ... 1.20 0.19 0.85 1.76 0.69
4C +74.26 (B) 3.63 0.16 11.53 0.41 1.62 ... ...
IGR 21247+5058 (B) 8.80 1.06 5.81 ... ... 0.03 ...
RX J2135.9+4728 (B) 9.82 1.17 9.64 0.04 0.27 0.07 ...
UGC 11871 7.14 0.84 1.99 0.04 0.32 0.19 0.51
NGC 7319 1.52 ... 3.30 0.42 1.81 1.35 0.93
3C 452 7.14 0.84 6.30 0.11 0.45 0.21 ...
SDSS spectra
Mkn 1018 (B) 2.82 ... 9.91 0.12 1.66 0.74 5.00
Mkn 590(B) 3.97 0.25 13.10 0.18 0.81 0.28 6.68
Mkn 18 5.00 0.48 1.36 0.03 0.29 0.23 ...
SDSS J090432.19+553830.1 (B) 3.75 0.19 4.34 0.05 0.42 0.27 1.83
SDSS J091129.97+452806.0 8.33 1.00 6.62 0.05 0.30 0.20 ...
SDSS J091800.25+042506.2 4.00 0.26 11.70 0.15 0.53 0.33 3.96
MCG +04-22-042 (B) 2.25 ... 2.22 0.02 0.25 0.13 6.22
Mkn 110(B) 4.10 0.28 7.98 0.12 0.21 0.17 3.61
Mkn 417 4.17 0.30 11.84 0.18 0.64 0.48 4.80
SBS 1136+594 (B) 3.38 0.09 11.42 0.10 0.07 0.20 5.53
CGCG 041-020 5.56 0.59 3.77 0.06 0.41 0.27 1.44
Ark 347 3.70 0.18 8.91 0.10 1.01 0.49 4.05
NGC 4388 2.94 ... 7.85 0.12 0.53 0.45 ...
NGC 4395 3.23 0.04 6.64 0.18 0.20 0.28 ...
NGC 4992 3.57 0.14 4.56 0.78 1.82 0.78 0.77
NGC 5252 4.17 0.30 6.30 0.27 0.73 0.65 ...
NGC 5506 5.88 0.65 6.73 0.07 0.40 0.14 ...
NGC 5548(B) 2.34 ... 11.23 0.20 0.57 0.38 ...
Mkn 290(B) 3.02 ... 11.15 0.07 0.39 0.24 16.56
Mkn 926 (B) 2.37 ... 10.08 0.30 0.85 0.69 3.17
Spectra from the literature
MRK 352b (B) 0.95 ... 18.25 0.007 0.28 0.007 ...
NGC 931c (B) 6.17 0.70 2.29 0.04 0.21 0.32 ...
NGC 1275b 4.16b 0.30 14.88b 1.37 1.36 1.38 ...
NGC 2110d 3.24 0.04 4.79 0.37 1.29 1.12 ...
NGC 3227b (B) 2.90b ... 5.91b 0.23 1.33 0.68 ...
NGC 3516b (B) 2.31 ... 9.28 0.15 1.31 0.70 ...
NGC 4051b (B) 3.30 0.06 4.50 0.14 0.64 0.36 ...
NGC 4102b 8.33 1.00 0.99 0.041 0.92 0.31 ...
NGC 4138b 3.66 0.17 5.94 0.33 1.47 1.32 ...
NGC 4151b (B) 3.40 0.09 11.56 0.22 0.68 0.54 ...
NGC 4388b 5.69 0.61 11.15 0.16 0.57 0.61 ...
NGC 4395b 2.12 ... 6.22 0.36 0.44 0.96 ...
NGC 5548b (B) 1.28 ... 10.09 0.36 0.88 0.66 ...

Notes. aSources with broad-lines (approximately Sy 1–Sy 1.5) are indicated with a (B). bHo et al. (1997). cVeilleux & Osterbrock (1987). dKewley et al. (2001).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

In Figure 9, we plot the distribution of E(BV) for the narrow and broad-line sources. Excluding the few outlying observations with measured values of E(BV)>1.0, we find that the broad-line sources have a lower average value than the narrow-line sources and a smaller range of values. We find the average value of E(BV) = 0.08 with a standard deviation of 0.11 for broad-line sources and an average value of E(BV) = 0.29 with a standard deviation of 0.33 for narrow-line sources. The results of a Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K–S) comparison test show that it is unlikely that the values are drawn from the same distribution with the maximum difference between the cumulative distributions (D) of 0.375 and a corresponding probability of 0.016. This probability is less, but still low, when the outlying points are included (D = 0.301 and P = 0.067). Thus, the narrow lines in type 2 objects are more extincted.

Figure 9.

Figure 9. Distributions of E(BV) for the narrow-line (left) and broad-line (right) sources. The average value and standard deviation are much smaller for the broad-line sources, as expected from the unified model.

Standard image High-resolution image

We classify our sources as H ii galaxies, composites (COMPs), Seyferts, or LINERs using the classification criteria based on the analysis of the emission-line properties of 85224 SDSS galaxies presented in Kewley et al. (2006). These criteria include a theoretical "maximum starburst line" from Kewley et al. (2001), shown as a solid line in the diagrams in Figure 10, which represents a boundary between H ii galaxies and AGNs. Additionally, in the [O iii]/Hβ versus [N ii]/Hα diagram, a dashed line shows the empirical division between pure star-forming galaxies and Seyfert-H ii composites from Kauffmann et al. (2003a). Finally, empirically derived divisions between LINERs and Seyferts, from Kewley et al. (2006), are shown in the [O iii]/Hβ versus [S ii]/Hα, [O iii]/Hβ versus [O i]/Hα, and [O iii]/[O ii] versus [O i]/Hα diagnostic plots. The emission-line diagnostic plots are shown in Figure 10 and the classifications are shown in Table 14.

Figure 10.

Figure 10. Emission-line diagrams showing narrow-line (circles) and broad-line (triangles) sources from the KPNO or SDSS spectra that we have analyzed, as well as values extracted from the literature (square). The diagnostic lines separating H ii galaxies from AGNs are shown in red (Kewley et al. 2001). In the [O iii]/Hβ vs. [N ii]/Hα diagnostic plot, the dashed blue line represents the division between H ii galaxies and composites from Kauffmann et al. (2003a). The blue dashed lines on the remaining plots represent the division between Seyferts and LINERs from Kewley et al. (2006).

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 14. Classification

Source [N ii]/Hα [S ii]/Hα [O i]/Hα [O iii]/[O ii] Class
KPNO spectra
NGC 788 AGN LINER LINER ... LINER
2MASX J03181899+6829322 AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
3C 105 AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
3C 111 (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
2MASX J04440903+2813003 AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
MCG −01-13-025 (B) AGN Seyfert LINER LINER Ambig.
1RXS J045205.0+493248 (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert
MCG +08-11-011 (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
IRAS 05589+2828 (B) AGN H ii H ii ... Ambig.
Mkn 3 AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
2MASX J06411806+3249313 AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
Mkn 6 (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
Mkn 79 (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert
Mkn 18 COMP H ii LINER LINER Ambig.
MCG −01-24-012 AGN Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert
MCG +04-22-042 (B) H ii H ii H ii Seyfert Ambig.
NGC 3227 (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
Mkn 417 AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
NGC 3516 (B) AGN Seyfert ... ... Seyfert
1RXS J1127166+190914 AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
UGC 6728 (B) ... H ii H ii H ii H ii
NGC 4051 (B) COMP Seyfert Seyfert ... Ambig.
Ark 347 AGN LINER Seyfert Seyfert (Seyfert)
NGC 4102 AGN H ii Seyfert ... Ambig.
NGC 4151 (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
Mkn 766 (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
NGC 4593 (B) AGN Seyfert LINER Seyfert Ambig.
MCG +09-21-096 (B) ... LINER Seyfert LINER Ambig.
Mkn 813 (B) ... Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert
Mkn 841 (B) AGN ... Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert
Mkn 1498 AGN Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert
NGC 6240 COMP H ii LINER H ii Ambig.
1RXS J174538.1+290823 (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert
3C 382 (B) ... ... ... ... ...
NVSS J193013+341047 (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert
1RXS J193347.6+325422 (B) COMP H ii ... ... COMP
3C 403 AGN Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert
Cygnus A AGN Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert
MCG +04-48-002 AGN LINER LINER LINER LINER
4C +74.26 (B) AGN ... Seyfert ... Seyfert
IGR 21247+5058 (B) ... H ii ... ... H ii (?)
RX J2135.9+4728 (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
UGC 11871 COMP H ii H ii H ii COMP
NGC 7319 AGN LINER LINER LINER LINER
3C 452 AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
SDSS spectra
Mkn 1018 (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert
Mkn 590 (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert
Mkn 18 H ii H ii H ii ... HII
SDSS J090432.19+553830.1 (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert
SDSS J091129.97+452806.0 AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
SDSS J091800.25+042506.2 AGN Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert
MCG +04-22-042 (B) H ii H ii H ii Seyfert Ambig.
Mkn110 (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert
Mkn 417 AGN Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert
SBS 1136+594 (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert
CGCG 041-020 AGN Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert
Ark 347 AGN Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert
NGC 4388 AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
NGC 4395 AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
NGC 4992 AGN Seyfert LINER LINER (LINER)
NGC 5252 AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
NGC 5506 AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
NGC 5548 (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
Mkn 290 (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert
Mkn 926 (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert
Spectra from the literature
MRK 352a (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
NGC 931b (B) H ii H ii H ii ... H ii
NGC 1275a AGN Seyfert LINER ... Ambig.
NGC 2110c AGN LINER LINER ... LINER
NGC 3227a (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
NGC 3516a (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
NGC 4051a (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
NGC 4102a AGN H ii H ii ... Ambig.
NGC 4138a AGN LINER Seyfert ... Ambig.
NGC 4151a (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
NGC 4388a AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
NGC 4395a AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert
NGC 5548a (B) AGN Seyfert Seyfert ... Seyfert

Notes. Parenthesis are placed around classifications where the probable class is noted despite the fact that not all of the criteria point to the same class. This is discussed within the text. The symbol (B) indicates broad-line sources (i.e., approximately Sy 1–1.5). aHo et al. (1997). bVeilleux & Osterbrock (1987). cKewley et al. (2001).

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset images: 1 2

Based on these classifications of the narrow-line sources (circles and a few squares (values from the literature) in Figure 10), 25 spectra are consistent with Seyferts, one spectrum corresponds to an H ii object, five spectra are consistent with LINERs, one is a composite, and six are ambiguous. Among these, we classify the Ark 347 KPNO spectrum as a Seyfert and NGC 4992 as a LINER. For each of these sources, the Veilleux & Osterbrock (1987) diagram including the [S ii]/Hα ratio is the only diagram with a classification inconsistent with the other classification plots. Errors in this measurement ([S ii]/Hα) could easily place the spectra within the Seyfert or LINER classification, respectively.

The LINER sources include NGC 788, NGC 2110, NGC 4992, MCG +04-48-002, and NGC 7319. Of these, NGC 4992 is classified as a possible X-ray bright optically normal galaxy (XBONG) by Masetti et al. (2006), and MCG +04-48-002 was previously classified as a starburst/H ii galaxy with a hidden Sy 2 nucleus (Masetti et al. 2006) (in their spectrum the [O i] λ6300 line was not detected). All but one of the classified LINERs (NGC 4992) have ratios of Hα/Hβ < 3.1.

The spectra classified as starburst/H ii galaxy and composite, respectively, are the SDSS spectrum of Mkn 18 and UGC 11871. Finally, the six ambiguous sources include: two spectra with COMP/LINER properties (the KPNO spectrum of Mkn 18 and NGC 6240, a luminous infrared galaxy known to show contributions from both the AGN and starbursts; Sanders et al. 1988), two spectra with Seyfert/H ii (both the KPNO and literature spectra of NGC 4102), and two spectra with Seyfert/LINER properties (NGC 1275, which is in the middle of a strong emission nebulae associated with the cooling flow in the Perseus cluster, and NGC 4138). In general, there is good agreement between classifications of sources with multiple spectra. Both Mkn 417 and Ark 347 spectra indicate a Seyfert and the NGC 4102 spectra show an ambiguous source between Seyfert/H ii. While the Mkn 18 classifications are not the same, they both point to having at least some H ii-like emission-line ratios (particularly [S ii]/Hα).

While it is clear that broad-line sources are Seyfert 1s, it is of interest to examine how they would be classified based on their narrow-line ratios. If the predictions of the unified model are true then, if the broad-line region is absorbed out, the narrow-line ratios should classify these objects as Seyferts also. We find, much to our surprise, that a significant fraction of the broad-line objects have narrow-line ratios which lie outside the AGN region based on the Kewley et al. (2006) classifications. While the majority (75%) of broad-line sources have narrow-line ratios consistent with classification as Seyferts (30 spectra), some (in particular NGC 931, 1RXSJ193347.6+325422, UGC 6728, and IGR21247+5058) are not, being classified as composites or H ii sources, though Hα and the [N ii] lines were too heavily blended to separate for the latter two. Additionally, seven spectra (including the KPNO and SDSS spectra of MCG +04–22–042) have ambiguous classifications. There is good agreement between classifications of sources with multiple spectra (i.e., MCG +04–22–042, NGC 4151, NGC 3227, NGC 3516). The source NGC 4051, classified as ambiguous from the KPNO spectrum due to the [N ii]/Hα diagram result showing a COMP, should more likely be classified as a Seyfert (as in the spectrum analyzed in the literature).

Therefore, the Swift BAT AGN optical classifications are mostly Seyferts. There are a total of 29 individual narrow-line sources represented, and of these, about 66% are Seyferts, 16% LINERs, 13% ambiguous, 3% composites, and 3% H ii galaxies. Of the 35 broad-line sources, about 75% are Seyferts, 14% are ambiguous, and 11% are composites or H ii galaxies. We find no broad-line sources with narrow emission consistent with LINERs.

Since we are studying in this paper the optical properties of a hard X-ray-detected sample, it is useful to make a comparison with optically selected samples, in particular the recent results of the SDSS. In this comparison, we find that the optically selected emission-line sources from the 85224 SDSS galaxy sample of Kewley et al. (2006) consist of very different percentages of the various classification categories than our hard X-ray selected sample. The SDSS sample consists of 75% star-forming/H ii galaxies, 3% Seyferts, 7% LINERs, 7% composites, and 8% ambiguous. It is no surprise, that the majority of our 14–195 keV X-ray sample consists of the much more energetic (across multiple bands) Seyferts. However, comparing the SDSS results solely with our narrow-line sources, we are finding far fewer LINERs than we might expect. In the optically selected SDSS sample, the LINER class contains more than twice the number of sources as Seyferts, while we are finding four times as many Seyferts as LINERs among the narrow-line sources.

There are a few possibilities as to why the hard X-ray sample selects fewer LINERs. The most obvious reason could be that LINERs are less luminous X-ray sources (we discuss this further in Section 6). Indeed, Kewley et al. (2006) did find that LINERs had substantially lower reddening corrected [O iii] 5007 Å luminosities than Seyferts. If L[O iii] is an indicator of bolometric luminosity and scales with the Swift BAT luminosity, we may simply not be detecting many LINERs with BAT because their X-ray fluxes are below the current detection threshold. Further, studies such as the Chandra snapshot analysis of Terashima & Wilson (2003) also find LINERs as less luminous than Seyferts in X-rays. Also, based on the nuclear X-ray luminosities of local LINER sources determined from the Chandra analysis of Flohic et al. (2006), the typical local LINER would have a BAT flux far below the flux detection limit of the Swift survey.

It is also possible that LINERs are more absorbed in the X-rays. In Winter et al. (2009a), we have shown that the more X-ray absorbed (i.e., highest neutral hydrogen column density) sources have lower X-ray luminosities, on average. If this is the case, we would expect to find a higher number of LINERs as Swift BAT detects more heavily absorbed and less luminous sources. In support of this possibility, the average value of the X-ray-derived NH = 6 × 1023 cm−2 of our LINERs is high (Winter et al. 2009a). This is in contrast, however, to the optical reddening, where we noted that the ratio Hα/Hβ is below the accepted value for AGN (3.1) and the theoretically expected value for case B recombination (2.85) for most of our LINERs. Kewley et al. (2006) also found this in 45% of their LINER sample, which could be the result of a higher nebular temperature (Osterbrock 1989) or shocks. In these cases, it is unclear how to relate the optical Balmer decrement to the X-ray-derived column density.

With lower luminosities than typical AGN sources and emission-line ratios potentially indicating a shock origin, it is possible that LINERs are typically not powered by accretion processes. As Flohic et al. (2006) show, many LINERs do not have any detected X-ray emission. Further, recent work by the SAURON team (Sarzi et al. 2009) and SEAGAL collaboration (Cid Fernandes et al. 2009) shows further indication that the majority of LINERs are not powered by AGN but instead by evolved stellar populations. Therefore, we would expect to detect few LINERs in the Swift BAT band.

5. ADDITIONAL DIAGNOSTIC LINES

Comparisons of the intensities of multiple emission lines from the same ion provide important diagnostics of the gas in which they are produced. In the optical range probed by our spectra, the relative population and therefore intensity of [S ii] λ6716/λ6731 depends on the density of the gas (with only a slight dependence on temperature of the order T1/2e). The [O iii] λ4363 emission line comes from a different upper energy level than the λ4959 and λ5007 lines, where the relative rates of excitation to these upper levels is strongly dependent on temperature. An equation relating the ratio of the [O iii] lines to temperature and density is given in Osterbrock (1989) as

Equation (6)

In Figure 11, we plot the reddening corrected flux ratios for both of these diagnostics ([S ii] and [O iii]). While both intensity ratios do not necessarily probe the same regions of the narrow-line region, this figure is useful in illustrating the range of values measured for our sample. One of the results of our analysis is that the ratio of [S ii] λ6716/λ6731 is similar for both the broad and narrow-line sources. Using a K–S comparison test, we find that both distributions are likely to be drawn from the same population with D = 0.22 and P = 0.50. The average and standard deviations of these values are 1.12 and 0.27 for the narrow-line sources and 1.09 and 0.23 for the broad-line sources. These values of the ratio of [S ii] λ6716/λ6731 correspond to electron densities of Ne ≈ 103 cm−3 (assuming Te = 104 K as in Figure 6.2 of Peterson 1997). These results are consistent with average narrow-line region densities of 2000 cm−3 found by Koski (1978). Thus, the hard X-ray-detected Swift BAT AGNs have the same densities as optically selected AGNs in this region (which produces the [S ii] emission), regardless of whether broad lines are present.

Figure 11.

Figure 11. Top: comparison of the ratio of intensities of [S ii] λ6716/λ6731 vs. the ratio of [O iii] (λ4959 + λ5007)/λ4363 for the narrow-line (circle) and broad-line (triangle) sources. A K–S test shows that the ratios of [S ii] (an indicator of density) are likely from the same population, while the [O iii]-temperature diagnostic is not. In the bottom plot, we show the average diagnostic value for the narrow (horizontal blue line) and broad (horizontal red line) line sources vs. density for values of constant temperature. This diagnostic points to a much higher temperature for the broad-line sources, if the densities are low. If the densities are high in this O+2 emission region for broad-line sources (106 cm−3Ne ≲ 107 cm−3) and low (Ne ≲ 104cm−3) for narrow-line sources, the temperatures are similar.

Standard image High-resolution image

The temperature sensitive diagnostic [O iii] (λ4959 + λ5007)/λ4363 clearly is not the same for the narrow and broad-line sources. The K–S comparison test yields a P-value of 0.000. The average and standard deviation of [O iii] (λ4959 + λ5007)/λ4363 is 166.0 and 193.0 for the narrow-line sources and 14.53 and 12.71 for the broad-line sources. To better illustrate what these values mean, in Figure 11 we also plot the relationship of the [O iii] temperature diagnostic versus electron density for fixed temperatures. The average values of both the narrow and broad-line sources are indicated with a horizontal line. In the low density limit (Ne < 104 cm−3), the average temperature of the [O iii] emitting gas is approximately 10,000 K for narrow-line sources and 50,000 K for broad-line sources. Typical temperatures for narrow-line regions are between 10,000–25,000 K, with an average value of 16,000 K reported in Koski (1978).

If the temperature of the narrow-line region in the type 1s and 2s is different, this would be a violation of the unified model. However, if the densities are different, this might be due to geometrical effects wherein the dense regions in type 2s are blocked from our view or have very high reddening values. However, there is uncertainty in the measurement of [O iii] (λ4959 + λ5007)/λ4363 associated specifically with the measurement of the faint [O iii] λ4363 line, which is just 1% of the bright λ4959 and λ5007 lines. We note that it is particularly hard to measure this line in the broad-line sources where Hγλ4340 may be producing a tilted pseudo-continuum.

The result of broad-line sources having lower values of [O iii] (λ4959 + λ5007)/λ4363 than narrow-line sources has been noted before and is attributed to broad-line sources having stronger λ4363 emission (Osterbrock 1978). Instead of a higher temperature in the narrow-line regions of broad-line sources, Osterbrock (1978) suggests densities of 106–107cm−3 in broad-line sources and ≲105 cm−3 in narrow-line sources. To reconcile these high densities with lower densities derived in the S+ emission region, the narrow-line region must consist of a range of densities, among which low densities are found in low-ionization regions. Under this interpretation, the temperatures of the narrow-line region producing O+2 are the same for broad and narrow-line sources, provided the densities differ in this higher ionization region.

6. [O iii] AND HARD X-RAY LUMINOSITIES

A fundamental property of an AGN is its power, measured through luminosity. In Figure 12, we plot the distributions of both the observed and extinction-corrected [O iii] 5007 Å luminosities for both our narrow-line and broad-line sources. For sources with multiple measurements, we averaged the values together to obtain a single measurement of observed and extinction-corrected luminosity per source (these values are included in Table 15). We find that the extinction corrections do not significantly change the luminosity measurements, with the corrected values being on average 1.1 (broad-line sources) and 1.3 (narrow-line sources) times larger than the observed luminosities.

Figure 12.

Figure 12. Histograms of the [O iii] 5007 Å emission-line luminosity for the narrow-line (Seyferts: blue; LINERs: green; others: hatched) and broad-line (red) sources, showing both the observed (obs, top plots) and extiction-corrected (corr, bottom plots) luminosities. The broad-line sources are more luminous on average than the narrow-line sources, in both the observed and extinction-corrected luminosities. The mean value for the extinction-corrected luminosity distribution of broad-line sources is log L[O iii] = 41.79, while the narrow-line sources have a mean value of log L[O iii] = 40.82.

Standard image High-resolution image

Table 15. Mass and Luminosity

Source λLλa Mb L[O iii](Obs)c L[O iii](Corr)c Mreverbb M2MASSb
NGC 788     40.84 ± 0.15 41.50 ± 0.15   8.51
Mkn 1018 43.61 ± 0.01 8.25 ± 0.02 41.64 ± 0.09 41.68 ± 0.09   8.94
Mkn 590 43.12 ± 0.01 7.94 ± 0.03 41.66 ± 0.04 41.66 ± 0.04 7.68 ± 0.06 8.87
2MASX J03181899+6829322     41.59 41.64    
3C 105     41.50 ± 0.01 41.50 ± 0.01   7.79
3C 111 44.47 ± 0.05 8.54 ± 0.03 43.12 43.12    
2MASX J04440903+2813003     40.00 40.00    
MCG −01-13-025 42.77 ± 0.02 8.12 ± 0.04 40.67 40.67   8.06
1RXS J045205.0+493248 43.59 ± 0.01 8.45 ± 0.01 42.17 ± 0.01 42.17 ± 0.01    
MCG +08-11-011 44.02 ± 0.02 8.07 ± 0.02 42.67 ± 0.07 42.67 ± 0.07    
IRAS 05589+2828 43.63 ± 0.01 8.22 ± 0.01 41.97 ± 0.33 42.06 ± 0.33    
Mkn 3     42.24 42.24   8.48
2MASX J06411806+3249313     41.24 ± 0.01 41.24 ± 0.01    
Mkn 6 43.66 ± 0.02 8.09 ± 0.02 42.31 42.36   8.24
Mkn 79 43.03 ± 0.03 7.62 ± 0.03 41.89 ± 0.02 41.93 ± 0.02 7.72 ± 0.10 8.42
Mkn 18     40.18 ± 0.05 40.19 ± 0.05   7.45
SDSS J090432.19+553830.1 42.99 ± 0.01 7.91 ± 0.01 41.56 ± 0.03 41.56 ± 0.03   7.70
SDSS J091129.97+452806.0     39.61 ± 0.01 39.61 ± 0.01   7.53
SDSS J091800.25+042506.2     42.10 42.10   8.57
MCG −01-24-012     41.04 ± 0.07 41.19 ± 0.07   7.16
MCG +04-22-042 43.63 ± 0.02 7.88 ± 0.01 42.07 ± 0.20 42.37 ± 0.20   8.49
Mkn 110 42.81 ± 0.03 7.36 ± 0.02 42.22 ± 0.19 42.22 ± 0.19 7.40 ± 0.09 7.80
NGC 3227 42.19 ± 0.01 7.15 ± 0.02 40.83 40.83 7.63 ± 0.17 7.83
Mkn 417     41.32 ± 0.08 41.32 ± 0.08   8.04
NGC 3516 43.00 ± 0.01 7.86 ± 0.02 41.13 41.13 7.63 ± 0.13 8.13
1RXS J1127166+190914     42.92 ± 0.10 43.01 ± 0.10   9.00
SBS 1136+594 43.78 ± 0.01 8.00 ± 0.01 42.48 42.48   7.53
UGC 6728 42.15 ± 0.01 6.71 ± 0.03 40.16 40.19   6.81
CGCG 041-020     40.30 ± 0.01 40.30 ± 0.01   8.46
NGC 4051 41.67 ± 0.01 6.10 ± 0.03 40.14 ± 0.18 40.14 ± 0.18 6.28 ± 0.15 7.27
Ark 347     41.29 ± 0.09 41.37 ± 0.09   8.12
NGC 4102     39.52 ± 0.82 39.52 ± 0.82    
NGC 4151 42.62 ± 0.04 7.07 ± 0.02 41.81 41.99 7.12 ± 0.13 7.69
Mkn 766 42.78 ± 0.02 7.06 ± 0.03 41.73 ± 0.02 41.73 ± 0.02   7.85
NGC 4388     41.24 ± 0.10 41.26 ± 0.10   8.53
NGC 4395     38.79 ± 0.01 38.79 ± 0.01   5.30
NGC 4593 42.75 ± 0.01 7.83 ± 0.07 40.71 ± 0.54 41.33 ± 0.54 6.99 ± 0.06 8.61
MCG +09-21-096 43.01 ± 0.01 7.88 ± 0.02 41.18 41.32    
NGC 4992     39.88 ± 0.42 39.88 ± 0.42   8.56
NGC 5252     40.89 ± 0.01 40.89 ± 0.01   8.64
NGC 5506     40.96 ± 0.08 40.96 ± 0.08   7.77
NGC 5548 43.04 ± 0.01 8.21 ± 0.02 42.03 ± 0.02 42.14 ± 0.02 7.83 ± 0.01 8.42
Mkn 813 44.16 ± 0.01 8.69 ± 0.03 42.24 ± 0.24 42.63 ± 0.24    
Mkn 841 43.51 ± 0.02 8.05 ± 0.02 42.17 42.19   8.15
Mkn 290 43.42 ± 0.02 7.90 ± 0.02 42.12 42.13   7.68
Mkn 1498     42.34 ± 0.16 42.89 ± 0.16   8.59
NGC 6240     40.64 ± 0.02 40.64 ± 0.02    
1RXS J174538.1+290823 43.59 ± 0.02 8.70 ± 0.01 42.65 ± 0.03 43.73 ± 0.03   8.75
3C 382 42.91 ± 0.02 8.36 ± 0.01 40.63 ± 0.84 40.63 ± 0.84   9.22
NVSS J193013+341047 43.43 ± 0.30 8.02 ± 0.19 42.54 42.54    
1RXS J193347.6+325422 43.44 ± 0.04 7.83 ± 0.03 41.84 ± 0.99 41.84 ± 0.99    
3C 403     41.53 ± 0.01 41.53 ± 0.01    
Cyg A     42.18 42.18    
MCG +04-48-002     40.44 ± 0.01 40.67 ± 0.01    
4C +74.26 45.25 ± 0.00 9.45 ± 0.01 43.03 ± 0.17 43.03 ± 0.17   9.00
IGR 21247+5058 41.88 ± 0.02 6.58 ± 0.07 40.49 ± 0.41 40.49 ± 0.41    
RX J2135.9+4728 42.08 ± 0.01 7.35 ± 0.08 40.54 ± 0.74 40.54 ± 0.74    
UGC 11871     41.38 ± 0.01 41.38 ± 0.01   8.34
NGC 7319     40.65 ± 0.03 40.92 ± 0.03   8.54
3C 452     40.89 ± 0.01 40.89 ± 0.01   8.54
Mkn 926 43.51 ± 0.01 8.36 ± 0.02 42.58 ± 0.01 42.69 ± 0.01   8.95

Notes. aλLλ is derived from the power-law continuum flux at 5100 Å and is the logarithm of the luminosity in units of erg s−1. bIndicated masses are the logarithm of the mass in solar masses. cThe logarithm of [O iii] 5007 Å luminosity is in units of erg s−1, including the observed luminosity (obs) and the extinction-corrected values (corr) using values of E(BV) recorded in Table 13. Where errors are not indicated, they are of the order of 10−3.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

The mean value for the distribution of extinction-corrected luminosity for the broad-line sources is log L[O iii] = 41.79 with a standard deviation of 0.90, while the narrow-line sources have a mean value of log L[O iii] = 40.82 with a standard deviation of 1.16. The results of a K–S comparison test suggest that these values are not drawn from a single population (D = 0.49 and P = 0.001). Therefore, the broad-line sources appear to be more luminous than the narrow-line sources, on average. This is also true of the observed luminosities (the averages and standard deviations are 41.76, 0.79 (broad-line sources) and 40.87, 1.08 (narrow-line sources)) and therefore not an effect of incorrect reddening corrections. If the [O iii] 5007 Å emission line is indeed an estimator of the AGN power (assuming that the contamination from star formation is not great), these results agree with our X-ray results for the BAT AGNs. Namely, Winter et al. (2009a) showed that the unobscured X-ray sources (presumably optical broad-line sources) in the sample were also intrinsically more luminous.

In Section 4, we described that previous optical and X-ray studies find LINERs as less luminous than Seyferts. Comparing the extinction-corrected [O iii] luminosities for the narrow-line sources, we confirm these results with our unbiased hard X-ray-detected sample. We find Seyferts have an average value of log L[O iii] = 41.55 with a standard deviation of 0.85, LINERs have an average value of log L[O iii] = 40.73 with a standard deviation of 0.60, and sources in other categories (including ambiguous classifications, H ii galaxies, and composites) have an average value of log L[O iii] = 40.33 with a standard deviation of 0.65. Of particular importance, we find that the narrow-line Seyferts have luminosities consistent with those of broad-line sources.

Further, we find that the hard X-ray luminosities (in the 14–195 keV band) show these same trends. To illustrate these results, we plot the distribution of hard X-ray luminosity for our sources in Figure 13. For the narrow-line sources, we find that the Seyferts have an average value of log L14 − 195 keV = 43.87 with a standard deviation of 0.94, LINERs have an average value of log L14 − 195 keV = 43.50 with a standard deviation of 0.16, and sources in other categories have an average value of log L14 − 195 keV = 42.69 with a standard deviation of 0.98. Once again, the H ii/composites/ambiguous sources have the lowest luminosities while the Seyferts are most luminous. Also, the X-ray luminosities of the narrow-line Seyferts are consistent with those of the broad-line sources (which have an average value of log L14 − 195 keV = 43.74 with a standard deviation of 0.74).

Figure 13.

Figure 13. Distributions of the 14–195 keV luminosity for broad-line (left) and narrow-line (right) sources. The narrow-line classifications are represented as Seyferts (white), LINERs (black), and either ambiguous/H ii galaxies/composites (hatched). The Seyferts are the most luminous of the narrow-line sources, both in the hard X-ray band and the optical (indicated by the [O iii] 5007 Å luminosities). While the broad-line sources have an average X-ray luminosity higher than the narrow-line sources, the distribution of luminosities for narrow-line Seyferts is the same as for the broad-line sources as a whole.

Standard image High-resolution image

Based on X-ray surveys, several studies had found the fraction of obscured sources to increase at lower 2–10 keV luminosities, including those by Ueda et al. (2003) and Steffen et al. (2003), as well as our own study of the Swift sources (Winter et al. 2009a). Based on an optically selected sample, Diamond-Stanic et al. (2009) also found differences in the distributions of 2–10 keV and [O iii] λ5007 luminosities for Sy 1s and Sy 2s in the revised Shapley-Ames sample (Sandage & Tammann 1987). A clear explanation for the differences in the X-ray-selected samples is that the lowest luminosity X-ray sources, which tend to be absorbed sources, are not optical Seyferts, as found in our current study. In an optically defined sample, we would expect both the obscured and unobscured Seyferts to have the same luminosity distributions. However, in this same optically selected sample Diamond-Stanic et al. (2009) find that the [O iv] λ25.89 μm line, an indicator of bolometric luminosity (Meléndez et al. 2008), does not show this difference in distributions between Sy 1s and Sy 2s. It is unclear how to interpret these results. Since the study of Diamond-Stanic et al. (2009) consists of only sources for which multi-wavelength luminosity measurements are available (18 Seyfert 1s and 71 Seyfert 2s), it is potentially biased (considering that X-ray surveys find equal numbers of absorbed and unabsorbed sources) compared to the Swift sample. However, the Diamond-Stanic et al. (2009) sample also includes a high percentage of Compton-thick sources (20%), which the Swift sample is currently not finding (due to the low X-ray flux in the BAT band of Compton-thick sources).

Since the hard X-ray luminosities are at high enough energies to cut through much of the gas and dust around the AGN, they are a good estimate of the bolometric luminosity. In lieu of these measurements, the optical [O iii] luminosities are often used as a measurement of the AGN total power. Further, in support of using the [O iii] luminosities as a proxy for the bolometric luminosity, Heckman et al. (2005) found a relationship between the observed hard X-ray (3–20 keV) and observed [O iii] luminosities for a sample of AGN in the RXTE slew survey. However, the results from a sample of Swift BAT AGN dispute the claim that [O iii] luminosities are good estimates of bolometric luminosity. Meléndez et al. (2008) found that [O iii] was not well correlated with the hard X-ray (14–195 keV).

With our larger and more uniformly measured extinction-corrected [O iii] sample than in the Meléndez et al. (2008) sample (drawn from the 3 month Swift catalog; Markwardt et al. 2005), we tested for a correlation between the BAT and [O iii] luminosities. In Figure 14(a), we plot the results of our comparison. We find weak linear correlations between the 14–195 keV and [O iii] luminosities for the broad and narrow-line sources. Using the ordinary least-squares (OLS) bisector method (Isobe et al. 1986)), we found L[O iii](corr) ∝ L1.16±0.1314 − 195 keV and R2 = 0.34 (P ≈ 0.005) for the broad-line sources and L[O iii](corr) ∝ L1.16±0.2414 − 195 keV and R2 = 0.42 (P ≈ 0.002) for the narrow-line sources. Here, R2 is the correlation coefficient. As further illustrated in the ratio of optical/hard X-ray luminosity in Figure 14(b), there is a great deal of scatter in these relationships (e.g., more than 2 mag at log L14 − 195 keV). Our results support those of Meléndez et al. (2008), showing that even the reddening corrected L[O iii] is affected by extinction. This effect is most pronounced for the narrow-line sources, which show the greatest amount of scatter.

Figure 14.

Figure 14. Relationship between observed (top) and reddening corrected (bottom) [O iii] 5007 Å luminosities and the 14–195 keV Swift BAT luminosities (left) and the ratio of these luminosities vs. the Swift BAT luminosity (right). In the plots, broad-line sources are indicated with red triangles, while the narrow-line sources are indicated with blue circles. As the left plots show, L[O iii] is not well correlated with the hard X-ray luminosity. The lines indicate the weak correlations seen for the Seyfert 1s ((corrected) R2 = 0.35) and narrow-line sources ((corrected) R2 = 0.38). In the right-hand plots, it is clear that there is a great deal of scatter in the optical/X-ray ratio for a given X-ray luminosity.

Standard image High-resolution image

As shown in Rigby et al. (2009), at high levels of absorption the luminosities measured in the Swift BAT band are affected by extinction. Using models from Matt et al. (2000), they show the difference between the emergent and input BAT flux at a variety of column densities. For column densities less than 1023 cm−2, this effect is minimal (⩽4%). Since none of our targets are Compton thick (NH < 1024 cm−2 in the Swift sample; see Winter et al. 2009b for Suzaku observations of heavily obscured sources confirming their Compton-thin nature), the effects on our sample are confined to a factor of ≈10%–20% for the highest column density sources (25% of the narrow-line sources). Even with this level of scatter introduced in the BAT luminosities, clearly the scatter seen in the narrow-line sources in Figure 14 is not accounted for by a 20% underestimate in BAT luminosity.

7. MASS AND ACCRETION RATE ESTIMATES

For each of the broad-line spectra, we were able to derive the mass of the central black hole using the FWHM of the broad component of Hβ and the continuum luminosity at 5100 Å. The continuum luminosity at 5100 Å was computed from a power-law continuum fit to the Hβ region. We calculated the Hβ masses using our measurements in Table 9 and Equation (5) from Vestergaard & Peterson (2006). The computed values of extinction-corrected λLλ (5100 Å) and M are included in Table 15. At the resolution of our spectra, we found that the Hβ line is often more complicated than a simple combination of narrow and broad Gaussian profiles. Additional structure or asymmetries are seen in a number of sources, making our measurements an approximation of the broad Hβ line FWHM (see Figure 5 for example fits).

To test how our values of M compare with other mass estimates, we plot our values versus reverberation mapping masses and masses derived from the stellar K-band light from Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) photometry in Figure 15. The mass estimates from reverberation mapping were obtained for nine sources from Peterson et al. (2004) and are listed in Table 15. As shown, our Hβ-derived masses are in good agreement with the reverberation mapping results (with the exception of NGC 4593). There are no systematic offsets between the two methods.

Figure 15.

Figure 15. Comparisons of the Hβ-derived masses from the FWHM of the broad component of Hβ and λLλ(5100 Å) and two additional mass estimates. The first comparison is with reverberation mapping masses, largely from Peterson et al. (2004). We find good agreement between the Hβ masses and this more direct mass measurement. The second comparison is with masses derived from the 2MASS K-band stellar magnitudes (Mushotzky et al. 2008; Winter et al. 2009a). We also find a correlation between these two mass measurements (IR and Hβ derived), indicated by the bolder dashed line. The additional dashed lines on the second plot represent values with (from the top to bottom most line) 10× difference, 2× difference, 1:1 correspondence, 1/2 difference, or 1/10 difference.

Standard image High-resolution image

Not surprisingly, there are larger differences between the IR-derived and Hβ-derived masses. The 2MASS Ks-band-derived masses (Mushotzky et al. 2008; Winter et al. 2009a; Vasudevan et al. 2009) were calculated by subtracting the central luminosity of a point source (the size of the 2MASS PSF). This presumed AGN luminosity was subtracted from the integrated luminosity of the galaxy to determine the luminosity of the stellar bulge. The relation defined by Novak et al. (2006) was then used to convert the bulge luminosity to stellar mass. Approximately 40% of the mass estimates from the 2MASS Ks band and Hβ are within a factor of 2 of each other. A greater majority of the IR masses are higher (typically, by up to a factor of 10).

Despite the fact that the 2MASS Ks-band-derived masses are a less accurate mass determination than those using reverberation mapping or the Hβ FWHM method, we find that the 2MASS and Hβ FWHM masses are linearly correlated. Using the OLS bisector method, we find

Equation (7)

with R2 = 0.56. This is encouraging since the 2MASS-derived measurements are the only uniform estimates that we have for the narrow-line and broad-line sources. Therefore, we use the 2MASS-derived masses to compare estimated masses, and later accretion rates, between all of our sources. Unlike our comparison of luminosities (log L[O iii]), we find that the 2MASS-derived masses show a great probability (from the K–S test) of the narrow and broad-line masses being derived from the same population (D = 0.21 and P = 0.71). The mean and standard deviations of log(MIR/M) are 8.07 and 0.83 (narrow-line sources) and 8.19 and 0.62 (broad-line sources). With the more accurate Hβ FWHM method, we find that the average mass of our sources (based on the broad-line sources) is log M/M= 7.87 with a standard deviation of 0.66. The range of masses, as shown in Figure 15, is consistent with those found in other AGN surveys. For example, our values are consistent with the range, 106–7 × 109M, found by Woo & Urry (2002) in a sample of 377 AGNs. Our values are also similar to those of nearby PG QSOs derived from H-band host magnitudes (Veilleux et al. 2009).

Since the masses of our narrow and broad-line sources are similar while the average narrow-line source luminosities are lower, we expect the values of L[O iii]/LEdd to differ. The [O iii] λ5007 luminosity is often used as an estimate of the bolometric luminosity of AGN, particularly for sources detected in the SDSS (see Heckman et al. 2004). Typical bolometric corrections for extinction-corrected [O iii] luminosities are expected to be between 600 and 800 for Seyfert 1s (Kauffmann & Heckman 2009). There are, however, problems with using L[O iii] as an estimate of bolometric luminosity. In the previous section, we showed that the hard X-ray luminosities, which are less affected by contamination from star formation and extinction, are not well correlated with L[O iii], particularly for the narrow-line sources. Despite these problems, the ratio of L[O iii]/LEdd allows us to compare a rough estimate of the accretion rates of our broad and narrow sources, which we can also compare with the more robust values we obtained in our X-ray study. In Figure 16, we plot the results (where LEdd is defined as 1.38 × 1038(M/M) and the mass is obtained from the 2MASS measurements). We find, as expected, that the ratio of L[O iii]/LEdd is lower for the narrow-line sources, with the average and standard deviations corresponding to 10−5.25±0.81 (narrow) and 10−4.61±0.85 (broad). Since only three LINERs and two H ii/composite/ambiguous sources have available 2MASS-derived masses, we cannot test whether sources in these categories have lower L[O iii]/LEdd values than Seyferts.

Figure 16.

Figure 16. Distributions of L[O iii]/LEdd for the narrow-line (Seyferts: blue, LINERs: green) and broad-line (red) sources. The [O iii] 5007 Å luminosity scales with the bolometric luminosity, making the ratio L[O iii]/LEdd an indicator of the accretion rate. While the ratio of L[O iii]/LEdd is lower for the narrow-line sources, a comparison of the accretion rates depends greatly on the bolometric corrections, which are determined from the spectral energy distributions and are not well known, particularly for the narrow-line sources. Only two of the H ii/ambiguous/other sources have masses available to calculate L[O iii]/LEdd. The average value for these sources is low, with log L[O iii]/LEdd = −5.4, but not as low as the value for the three LINERs with available mass measurements (−5.9).

Standard image High-resolution image

For the broad-line sources, our estimate of the average accretion rate (Lbol/LEdd), assuming a bolometric correction of 600, is 0.015 with the 2MASS-derived masses or 0.034 with the Hβ FWHM-derived masses. Based on our X-ray analysis (Winter et al. 2009a), the 2MASS-derived masses, and an assumed 2–10 keV bolometric correction of 35 for unabsorbed sources (Barger et al. 2005), we estimate an X-ray-derived accretion rate of 0.040. Therefore, there is very good agreement between the optical and X-ray-derived accretion rates, in an average sense. Unfortunately, with increased uncertainty in the bolometric corrections, it is more difficult to determine these values for the narrow-line/Sy 2 sources.

8. HOST GALAXY PROPERTIES

Since the Swift BAT-detected AGNs are relatively close (〈z〉 ≈ 0.03) and bright, intrinsic stellar absorption features are seen in the majority of the spectra we analyzed. This allows us to determine some of the properties of the host galaxies of our target AGN. To do this, we have employed two particular methods to analyze the intrinsic stellar absorption features—one using continuum fits and the other measuring stellar absorption indices. We note, however, that the sampling of the host galaxy populations for the BAT-detected AGN is not uniform, but a function of the aperture size (2''–3''), distance to the source, and both the size and orientation of the host galaxy within the slit. It is our intent, in this paper, to determine basic conclusions about the stellar populations from the optical spectra. More detailed information on the host galaxies of this sample, including star formation rates from Spitzer follow-ups and colors from an analysis of ground-based optical imaging data, will be presented by our collaborators.

The first method we used to obtain information about the AGN host galaxy populations was the continuum model fitting described in Section 3.1. For each of our sources, we fit the continuum with a combination of a power law (representing the non-thermal continuum) and a combination of a young, intermediate, and old single stellar population model, utilizing three different metallicities. We then created a grid of test cases to test the ability of the continuum models to accurately describe the host galaxy spectrum, finding that metallicities could not be determined but that young stellar populations are clearly distinguished between both the intermediate and old stellar populations (see Appendix A). There is a degree of degeneracy between the intermediate and old populations as well which occurs when these populations are in combination with other populations (for example, a model of 50% intermediate and 50% young populations can be equally well modeled with a best-fit continuum model that is a combination of young, intermediate, and old populations).

The main result of our continuum model fits is that the majority of the Swift BAT AGN in our sample have either a weak or no contribution from young stellar populations and are dominated by intermediate/old populations. Of the sources with continuum light dominated by stellar populations, only one source has 50% or more of their light dominated by a young (25 Myr) population—NGC 4151, whose host galaxy is a barred spiral (Sab) with a ring of star formation. This is in contrast with the 15 sources with 50% dominated by intermediate (2500 Myr) populations and the 23 with 50% or more dominated by old (10,000 Myr) populations. To these results, however, we must add the caveat that we measured the continua with very simplified models. It is also possible that degeneracies between the power-law and young stellar component exist.

Still, the result of the BAT AGN hosts being largely composed of intermediate to old populations, is supported further through an analysis of the HδA and Dn(4000) stellar absorption indices. These age sensitive indicators, the former sensitive to recent starbursts and the latter to an indicator of old populations through measurement of the Ca ii break, reveal few sources (six total) in the region of the HδADn(4000) parameter space occupied by systems with significant contributions from young stellar populations (≳30%). Due to contamination of the absorption features from AGN emission lines (i.e., [Ne iii] λ3869 and Hδ), this result is based largely on the obscured sources.

Based on an SDSS study by Kauffmann et al. (2003a), low-luminosity narrow-line AGNs are hosted in old galaxies (as indicated by Dn(4000)). This is consistent with the results of our study. Additionally, we find that the distribution of our narrow-line sources in the HδADn(4000) plot is consistent with the location of "strong" AGN in the SDSS sample (Figure 17 in Kauffmann et al. 2003a). Since their definition of strong (3.85 × 1040 erg s−1 in [O iii] λ5007) includes the majority of our sources, this shows that our results are consistent with the SDSS results. As shown in Kauffmann et al. (2003a), the values of Dn(4000) for our narrow-line sources are indicative of normal late-type galaxies. This is also consistent with our analysis of the morphologies of the nine month sample AGNs, as listed in NED. In Winter et al. (2009a), we had shown that the hosts of our sources (both Sy 1 and Sy 2 sources) were mostly spirals and irregulars.

Another result from the Kauffmann et al. (2003a) study is a connection between the age distribution of host galaxies and the [O iii] luminosity of the AGN. In Figure 17, we plot each of the stellar age indicators (HδA and Dn(4000)) versus the extinction-corrected [O iii] luminosity and the ratio L[O iii]/LEdd for both the narrow and broad-line AGNs. The top plots of this figure are comparable to Figure 12 of Kauffmann et al. (2003a, whose L[O iii] measurements are in units of L). We find no direct correlation between either of these stellar absorption indices and either [O iii] luminosity or accretion rate (R2 ≲ 0.1). Since our sources include only the equivalents of SDSS "strong" AGN, it is not surprising that we do not see a correlation. Our sample does not include weak AGNs, which tend to have older populations (associated with early-type galaxies).

Figure 17.

Figure 17. Two age indicators, HδA which measures recent bursts of star formation and Dn(4000) which measures the Ca ii break and is sensitive to old stellar populations vs. the reddening corrected [O iii] 5007 Å luminosity and L[O iii]/LEdd for the narrow-line (circles) and broad-line (triangles) sources.

Standard image High-resolution image

Finally, we find a possible indication that the host galaxies of broad and narrow-line sources may be different. Namely, we see differences in the metallicity indicator Mgb. Applying the K–S test, we find a P-value of 0.01, indicating that the populations are likely different. For the broad-line sources, we find an average value of 0.84 with a standard deviation of 1.65 in Mgb. The narrow-line sources have a much higher average Mgb measurement of 1.96 with a standard deviation of 2.27. Based on our simulations, lower values of Mgb also correspond to younger populations (see the top left panel of Figure 20). Therefore, there is a degeneracy between age and metallicity such that the result of broad-line sources having lower values of Mgb could indicate their hosts as either having a larger contribution from a younger population or from a lower metallicity than the hosts of narrow-line sources.

9. CONCLUSIONS

AGN surveys are typically dominated by two selection effects: (1) dilution by starlight from the host galaxy and (2) obscuration by dust and gas in the host galaxy and/or the AGN itself (see Hewett & Foltz 1994; Mushotzky 2004). For these reasons, an unbiased AGN sample is difficult to define. The Swift's BAT AGN survey provides one of the first truly unbiased (to all but the highest column densities) samples of local AGNs.

Since the BAT-detected sources are nearby, 〈z〉 = 0.03 (Tueller et al. 2008), they are excellent targets for multi-wavelength follow-ups. In this paper, we presented the optical spectral properties from sources detected in the first nine months of the survey. Our analysis includes both the emission-line properties of the AGN as well as the host properties revealed from intrinsic stellar absorption features. The sample includes 40 spectra taken at the 2.1 m KPNO telescope, 24 archived SDSS spectra, and the emission-line properties of 13 sources presented in the literature. In total, this sample covers 81% of the Swift BAT AGN sources viewable from KPNO. It is comprised of 55% broad-line sources and 45% narrow-line sources, in the same ratio as the total Swift sample.

With our unbiased AGN sample, it is important to compile the fundamental properties of the sources both as a test to our current understanding of AGN and as a comparison to more biased methods of detection (e.g., optical surveys). Using standard emission line diagnostic plots, we find that the majority of our hard X-ray-detected sources are optically Seyferts (66% of narrow-line and 75% of broad-line sources). This contrasts with the optically selected SDSS sample examined by Kewley et al. (2006), which includes a large (75%) fraction of H ii galaxies with few Seyferts (3%). Since H ii galaxies are less luminous than Seyferts in the X-ray band (Ranalli et al. 2003), it is not surprising that our hard X-ray flux limited sample detects the more luminous local sources, which are Seyferts. In the same sense, the optical SDSS sample detects more LINERs, which are also less luminous sources than Seyferts, than we find in the Swift BAT sample. In particular, we classify 16% of the narrow-line sources as LINERs and none of the broad-line sources.

One of the most fundamental properties of a black hole is its mass. Under the unified AGN model, we expect to find no difference in the mass distribution between the broad and narrow-line sources. Indeed, we find the distributions of our 2MASS-derived masses statistically consistent with being drawn from the same population. Comparing 2MASS-derived masses with a more accurate determination from the FWHM of Hβ in broad-line sources, we find the masses from both methods are well correlated. The average value of our hard X-ray-detected sources is 〈M/M〉 = 107.87±0.66, with a range of values consistent with those found in previous studies of AGNs (Woo & Urry 2002) and nearby PG QSOs (Veilleux et al. 2009).

Determinations of the reddening from the ratio of narrow Hα/Hβ, as well as gas densities and temperatures in the narrow-line regions from diagnostic emission lines of the same ion, are also consistent with both the unified model and previous results from optical studies. Under the unified model, we expect narrow-line sources to have heavier extinction (assuming the extinction is on the nuclear/galactic scale and not simply from the torus), while other narrow-line region properties like density and temperature to be the same for narrow and broad-line sources. As expected, we find the average distribution of reddening values [E(BV)] higher in the narrow-line sources. In our calculations of the gas density in the S+ emission region, we find the same electron densities of Ne ≈ 103 cm−3 for broad and narrow-line sources. Superficially, the O+2 region appears at a higher temperature for the broad-line sources. However, as discussed in Osterbrock (1978), a likely explanation is that the narrow and broad-line sources both have similar temperatures (we find Te ≈ 10,000 K), but in the broad-line sources we are able to probe [O iii] λ4363 emitting gas into denser regions of the narrow-line region.

Based on the results of our X-ray study of our unbiased AGN sample, we suspect that the distributions of luminosities of the Swift AGN conflict with the unified model. Namely, our X-ray results (Winter et al. 2009a) showed that the absorbed/type 2 AGNs (X-ray absorbed/optically narrow-line sources, including optically classified Sy 2s, LINERs, and H ii galaxies) have lower absorption corrected 2–10 keV luminosities and accretion rates. These same trends are found among the optically derived luminosities and accretion rates. Specifically, we find average extinction-corrected 5007 Å [O iii] luminosities of 1041.74±0.93 erg s−1 and 1040.94±1.00 erg s−1 and ratios of L[O iii]/LEdd of 10−4.61±0.85 and 10−5.25±0.81, respectively, for broad and narrow-line sources. Contrary to the results of Heckman et al. (2005), but in agreement with Meléndez et al. (2008), we find that the 14–195 keV BAT luminosities are only weakly correlated with [O iii] luminosity for broad and narrow-line sources.

Seemingly, the result of narrow-line sources having lower luminosities and possibly accretion rates (depending on the bolometric corrections) poses a challenge to the unified model. On closer inspection, we find that the narrow-line sources with optical classifications as Seyferts have similar X-ray and optical luminosities to their broad-line, Seyfert 1 counterparts. Instead, it is the sources optically classified as LINERs and H ii/composite/ambiguous sources which have lower luminosities. While these sources are clearly detected AGN based on their X-ray properties, modification of the unified model to include a luminosity dependence is clearly required to link these fainter non-Seyfert sources with the Seyfert 1s and 2s.

Finally, through our continuum model fits and measurements of stellar absorption indices, we can make a few general comments on the host galaxy properties of our sources. We find that the stellar ages of the hosts include small contributions from young populations (0.25 Gyr). The populations are more consistent with intermediate/old (2.5–10 Gyr) populations. Comparing with the results drawn from the SDSS survey, we find that our narrow-line sources have the same properties as the "strong" narrow-line AGN from Kauffmann et al. (2003a). Therefore, their stellar absorption properties (from the Ca ii break and Hδ absorption) are like those of late-type galaxies. This is also consistent with the NED morphologies of our sources (both Sy 1s and Sy 2s), which are mostly spirals and irregulars (Winter et al. 2009a).

The authors greatly thank Christy Tremonti for use of her analysis codes and discussions on how to modify them for application to our AGN sources. L.W. acknowledges support by NASA grant NNX08AC14G. Also, she acknowledges support through NASA grant HST-HF-51263.01-A, through a Hubble Fellowship from the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Incorporated, under NASA contract NAS5-26555. S.V. acknowledges support from a Senior Award from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and thanks the host institution, MPE Garching, where some of this work was performed. K.T.L. acknowledges support from the NASA Postdoctoral Program Fellowship (NNH 06CC03B). The Kitt Peak National Observatory observations were obtained using MD-TAC time as part of the thesis of L.W. at the University of Maryland (for programs 0322 and 0107) and M.K. (program 0295). Kitt Peak National Observatory, National Optical Astronomy Observatory, is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA) under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.

Facilities: Swift () - Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission, KPNO:2.1m () - Kitt Peak National Observatory's 2.1 meter Telescope, Sloan () - Sloan Digital Sky Survey Telescope

APPENDIX A: GALAXY CONTINUUM SPECTRAL FITS

In this section, we detail additional tests that we conducted to test the accuracy of the galaxy continuum fits. As explained in Section 3.1, we used a grid of single stellar age population models (Bruzual & Charlot 2003) with three different ages (25, 2500, and 10,000 Myr) and at three different metallicities (2.5 Z, Z, and 0.2 Z) to fit the continua of our AGN and template galaxy spectra. In order to test the accuracy of these models, we constructed a grid of test spectra, broadening the sources by assuming FWHM =300 km s−1 (σ ≈ 128 km s−1) and adding both random noise and reddening (τ = 1.5) to the stellar population models used in the continuum fits. This grid of models includes a young, intermediate, and old population, as well as the following combinations: 50% young + 50% intermediate, 50% young + 50% old, 50% intermediate + 50% old, and 33% young + 33% intermediate + 33% old. In Figure 18, we plot several of these test spectra.

Figure 18.

Figure 18. Several of the test spectra created by broadening combinations of the stellar population models to a velocity dispersion of 300 km s−1, adding random noise, and the effects of reddening. From top to bottom, plotted are a young, 50% young + 50% intermediate, 50% young + 50% old, 33% young + 33% intermediate + 33% old, and 50% intermediate + 50% old population. Notice, there is very little difference between the 50% young + 50% intermediate and 50% young + 50% old populations. We specifically plot the region surrounding the 4000 Å break, a region with prominent intrinsic absorption features.

Standard image High-resolution image

Assuming an error of 10% in the flux, we fit each of the test spectra with the model spectra used to fit the continua of our target spectra. The results of these fits are shown in Table 16. Our results show that the velocity dispersions are accurately measured by the models in all cases. The metallicities, however, are not since all of our test spectra have solar metallicity but a range of values are found from the fitting process. We also find that the young stellar population component is measured well, though its contribution is underestimated by up to about 20%. Finally, we find that there is a degeneracy between the intermediate and old populations when they are found in combination with the young population. This is well illustrated in Figure 18, where there is little difference between the 50% young + 50% intermediate and 50% young + 50% old spectra. We do, however, find that a 100% intermediate population is distinguishable from a 100% old population. Therefore, the main conclusion that we draw from our test spectra is that our continuum model fits can clearly distinguish between young and intermediate/old populations. See Kauffmann et al. (2003b) for more detailed investigations used to study the SDSS host galaxies.

Table 16. Stellar Light Fits to the Test Spectra

Test Spectrum FWHMa Za Lfyounga Lfinterma Lfolda
25 Myr (Y) 300 0.2 Z 0.89 0.00 0.11
2500 Myr (I) 330 2.5 Z 0.00 1.00 0.00
10000 Myr (O) 300 Z 0.00 0.00 1.00
0.5 × (Y + I) 300 0.2 Z 0.41 0.28 0.30
0.5 × (Y + O) 300 Z 0.32 0.68 0.00
0.5 × (I + O) 330 2.5 Z 0.00 1.00 0.00
0.33 × (Y + I + O) 300 Z 0.19 0.81 0.00

Note. aThe fitted values using the stellar population models of Bruzual & Charlot (2003) include FWHM (km s−1), metallicity (Z), and light fractions (Lf) at 5500 Å  using populations at 25 (young or Y), 2500 (interm or I), and 10,000 (old or O) Myr.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

In a similar manner, we also created test spectra to look for degeneracies between the stellar continuum and power-law component. To accomplish this, we used the same set of test galaxy models as above. For each of these test spectra, we added a power-law component with an index (p1) set to the average value determined from fits to our AGN sources (0.67). We constrained the values such that the light fraction from both the stellar light and power law contributed 50% of the light at 5500 Å. Results of these fits are presented in Table 17. We find that there is no obvious degeneracy between any of the stellar population models and the power-law component (at least at this power-law index). The average fitted power-law index, 0.74, is slightly higher than the true value while the fitted fraction of light contributed from the power law tends to be slightly lower than the true value (most of the values are between 0.41 and 0.45 instead of 0.50). Generally, we find that the fitted values are consistent with the input parameters.

Table 17. Best-fit Power-law + Stellar Light Fits to the Test Spectra

Source FWHMa Za p0a p1a Lfpowa Lfyounga Lfinterma Lfolda
25 Myr (Y) + pow 300 Z 9.3 × 10−4 0.77 0.42 0.58 0.00 0.00
2500 Myr (I) + pow 300 Z 3.3 × 10−3 0.66 0.44 0.00 0.56 0.00
10000 Myr (O) + pow 300 Z 4.6 × 10−4 0.87 0.45 0.00 0.09 0.46
0.5 × (Y + I) + pow 300 Z 8.5 × 10−4 0.79 0.41 0.30 0.24 0.05
0.5 × (Y + O) + pow 300 Z 4.2 × 10−2 0.41 0.61 0.20 0.00 0.19
0.5 × (I + O) + pow 300 Z 6.2 × 10−4 0.83 0.44 0.00 0.29 0.28
0.33 × (Y + I + O) + pow 300 Z 3.8 × 10−4 0.87 0.41 0.19 0.20 0.20

Note. aThe fitted values using the stellar population models of Bruzual & Charlot (2003) include FWHM (km s−1), metallicity (Z), and light fractions (Lf) at 5500 Å using both a power-law and stellar population models with ages of: 25 (young), 2500 (interm), and 10,000 (old) Myr. The values p0 and p1 are the power-law components, defined as $p_0 \times \lambda ^{p_1}$. The constant factor, p0, is constrained to range from 0 to 1.

Download table as:  ASCIITypeset image

In addition to testing the accuracy of the continuum fits, we also used our grid of test galaxy spectra (excluding a power-law contribution) to interpret the results of measurements of stellar absorption indices in our target spectra. In addition to using the grid of solar models we described above, we created grids of populations with metallicities 2.5 and 0.20 times solar abundance. For all of these sources, we measured the stellar absorption indices in the same manner as for our target spectra (see Section 3.3). In this way, we can use our test spectra, which are of approximately the same signal to noise as our target spectra, to understand the results of an analysis of the stellar absorption indices.

In Figure 19, we plot the HδA index versus Dn(4000) for our test spectra. As we described in Section 3.3, these two indices are commonly used as indicators of the age of stellar populations. As the plot shows, metallicity of the stellar population models does not have a large effect on these stellar absorption indices. Further, as expected, there is a clear dependence on age, where populations with a significant (33% or higher) contribution from a young population have both the highest values of HδA, associated with recent bursts of star formation, and the lowest values of Dn(4000), which indicates the strength of the Ca ii break. We find that the populations with significant contributions of young populations have HδA > 2 and Dn(4000) <1.2.

Figure 19.

Figure 19. Stellar absorption index HδA vs. the Dn(4000) index for the test spectra. Both are commonly used as age indicators of a stellar population. In the plot, our test spectra, consisting of combinations of single stellar population models, are shown for three metallicities: 0.2 Z (triangle), Z (circle), and 2.5 Z (square). We find that metallicity has little effect on the values of these stellar absorption indices, as expected. We also find that populations with significant contributions from young populations (33% or higher) fall within a small parameter space on the plot, toward the upper left hand corner.

Standard image High-resolution image

In Figure 20, we plot additional stellar absorption indices often used as metallicity indicators (as well as the Ca ii break age indicator) for the test galaxy spectra. Each metallicity is represented with a different color, with the same grid of different stellar population components mentioned above. We point out that, as shown in the Dn(4000) versus Mgb plot, the populations with significant contributions from young stars (<1.2) tend to have lower values of Mgb (≲3). Distinctions between intermediate/old higher metallicity (Z and 2.5 Z) and low-metallicity (0.2 Z) populations are seen in the C24668 versus Mgb, [MgFe] versus Mgb and 〈Fe〉 versus Mgb plots—where higher values in x and y parameters are seen for the higher metallicity populations. For young populations of any metallicity, it is more difficult to distinguish between different metallicity populations.

Figure 20.

Figure 20. Measured stellar absorption indices vs. the Mgb stellar absorption index for the test spectra. With the exception of Dn(4000), which is an age indicator, the remaining plotted indices are sensitive to abundances of metals in the population. In the plot, our test spectra, consisting of combinations of single stellar population models, are shown for three metallicities: 0.2 Z (yellow), Z (black), and 2.5 Z (green). The line in the top left plot indicates the division between young populations (below the line) and older populations (see Figure 19).

Standard image High-resolution image

APPENDIX B: NOTES ON INDIVIDUAL SPECTRA

In this section, we include notes on the emission-line spectra of the sources examined. These notes particularly relate to peculiarities in the spectra or the fitting procedure for sources indicated.

For 10 broad-line sources (or ≈1/3 of the broad-line sources), absorption lines from the Na iD doublet λλ5890, 5896 are seen. These absorption features are seen in Mkn 1018, Mkn 590, MCG −01-13-025, Mrk 6, SDSS J090432.19+553830.1, NGC 3227, NGC 3516, NGC 4593, MCG +09-21-096, NGC 5548, and RX J2135.9+4728. In the spectrum of MCG +09-21-096, the absorption line is embedded in a broad He i (FWHM ≈2270 km s−1) emission line. The Na iD doublet was also detected (by eye) in nine narrow-line sources: NGC 788, Mkn 18, SDSS J091129.97+452806.0, SDSS J091800.25+042506.2, Ark 347, NGC 4102, NGC 6240, UGC 11871, and NGC 7319.

Additionally, there are notes on the following broad-line sources.

LEDA 138501. Hβ has a "red" wing.

MCG −01-13-025, Mrk 1018, NGC 3227. Strong intrinsic absorption lines are seen in the spectra of these broad-line sources. He i is seen in absorption for both sources.

IRAS 05589+2828. There is a clear broad component to He ii λ4686. Hβ has a red wing.

MCG +04-22-042. There is a clear broad component to He ii λ4686.

SBS 1136+594. There is a clear broad component to He ii λ4686.

UGC 6728. Two narrow emission lines are present for each of the [O iii] emission lines (at 4959 Å and 5007 Å).

NGC 4593. Two narrow emission lines are present for each of the [O iii] emission lines (at 4959 Å and 5007 Å).

MCG +09-21-096. The profiles of the broad Balmer lines are complex, with broad "boxy" shapes (including Hδ, Hγ, Hβ, and Hα).

Mrk 813. Hβ is blended with the nearby [O iii] emission lines.

4C +74.26. Hβ is extremely broad and blended with the nearby [O iii] emission lines at this resolution.

Narrow-line sources Mkn 18. Both the KPNO and SDSS spectra show an additional broad component to Hα of approximately 370 km s−1.

Ark 347. The Hα region is quite complex. Six distinct narrow lines are seen in the region including [N ii] λ6548, Hα, and [N ii] λ6583. The measured wavelengths of these lines are 6546.72 ± 0.17, 6555.7 ± 0.34, 6563.25 ± 0.19, 6570.23 ± 0.08, 6582.42 ± 0.20, and 6591.70 ± 0.09 Å.

Footnotes

Please wait… references are loading.
10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/503