M A Kabir et al 2004 Fluid Dyn. Res. 35 391 doi:10.1016/j.fluiddyn.2004.09.001
M A Kabir1, M M K Khan1,3 and M A Bhuiyan2
Show affiliationsThe flow in a channel, when obstructed with a geometry at the entry, can be forward, reverse or stagnant depending on the position of the obstruction. There are several parameters that influence the flow inside and around the test channel. The most dominant parameters that influence the flow phenomena are the shapes and sizes of obstruction geometry and the gap (g) between the obstruction and the entry of the test channel. Influence of these flow parameters were investigated using velocity measurement and flow visualization images. The velocity measurement and the flow visualization provided the quantitative and qualitative information, respectively. The velocity measurements were carried out for different shapes of obstruction geometries at a fixed velocity of 0.24 m/s which is equivalent to a Reynolds number of 6000. The flat plate produced the maximum reverse flow reaching 20% of the incoming channel velocity, while the circular geometry produced the minimum reverse flow. However, the circular geometry produced the maximum forward flow equal to 90% of the incoming velocity while the flat plate produced the minimum forward flow. For a rectangular shaped obstruction, it was found that the shorter after-body length (l/b = 0.32) produced the maximum reverse flow. The influence of the gap on the velocity ratio was also investigated for flat plate obstruction geometry and is presented here. The flow visualization pictures showing the flow pattern inside and around the test channel are also presented and discussed.
47.60.-i Flow phenomena in quasi-one-dimensional systems
Issue 6 (December 2004)
M A Kabir et al 2004 Fluid Dyn. Res. 35 391
Chiang-Mei Chen et al 2002 Class. Quantum Grav. 19 347
A Faure et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 192 012016
W A M Wan Mohamed and J N Petzing 2009 Metrologia 46 315
P Kidkhunthod and A C Barnes 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 190 012076
J A J Steen et al 2006 Nanotechnology 17 1464
N. F. H. Tothill et al. 2009 ApJS 185 98
Lawrence W Townsend 2001 J. Radiol. Prot. 21 5
A Kawabata 2007 Rep. Prog. Phys. 70 219
Dale L Bailey et al 2004 Phys. Med. Biol. 49 N21