Tomoaki Nogawa and Takehisa Hasegawa 2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 478002 doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/47/478002
Tomoaki Nogawa1 and Takehisa Hasegawa2
Show affiliationsWe discuss the nature of the two-stage percolation transition on the enhanced binary tree in order to explain the disagreement in the estimation of the second transition probability between the one in our recent paper (2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 145001) and the other in the comment to it from Baek et al (2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 478001). We point out some reasons that the finite size scaling analysis used by them is not proper for the enhanced tree due to its nonamenable nature, which is verified by some numerical results.
05.50.+q Lattice theory and statistics (Ising, Potts, etc.)
82B80 Numerical methods (Monte Carlo, series resummation, etc.) (See also 65-XX, 81T80)
Issue 47 (27 November 2009)
Received 4 August 2009
Published 4 November 2009
Tomoaki Nogawa and Takehisa Hasegawa 2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 478002
Gary D. Schmidt et al. 2001 ApJ 553 823
T Roman et al 2009 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 474219
2001 Class. Quantum Grav. 18
S. M. Khairul Alam and Barbara S. Ryden 2002 ApJ 570 610
T David et al 2005 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38 2407
N Lacević and S C Glotzer 2003 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15 S2437
Chang-Pu Sun 1987 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 20 L1157
Yuri Babanov et al 2009 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 190 012030
D M Gitman and V G Kupriyanov 2007 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 10071