Koji Nagata 2008 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 155308 doi:10.1088/1751-8113/41/15/155308
Koji Nagata
Show affiliationsRecently, it has been shown that an explicit local realistic model for the values of a correlation function, given in a two-setting Bell experiment (two-setting model), works only for the specific set of settings in the given experiment, but cannot construct a local realistic model for the values of a correlation function, given in a continuous-infinite settings Bell experiment (infinite-setting model), even though there exist two-setting models for all directions in space. Hence, the two-setting model does not have the property which the infinite-setting model has. Here, we show that an explicit two-setting model cannot construct a local realistic model for the values of a correlation function, given in an only discrete-three settings Bell experiment (three-setting model), even though there exist two-setting models for the three measurement directions chosen in the given three-setting experiment. Hence, the two-setting model does not have the property which the three-setting model has.
03.67.Lx Quantum computation architectures and implementations
03.65.Ta Foundations of quantum mechanics; measurement theory
81P15 Quantum measurement theory
81P68 Quantum computation and quantum cryptography (See also 68Q05, 94A60)
Issue 15 (18 April 2008)
Received 20 December 2007, in final form 13 February 2008
Published 2 April 2008
Koji Nagata 2008 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 155308
G Boulousis et al 2008 Nanotechnology 19 255301
J Thirumalai et al 2008 Nanotechnology 19 395703
T Irisawa et al 2009 New J. Phys. 11 113031
Jin Xie et al 2009 J. Micromech. Microeng. 19 125029
K Boukheddaden et al 2007 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 106201
A K Gangopadhyay et al 2007 Nanotechnology 18 485606
Hui Dong et al 2009 Supercond. Sci. Technol. 22 125022
Youngnam Cho et al 2009 Nanotechnology 20 275102
D-H Tsai et al 2007 Nanotechnology 18 365201