Jonathan Koomey et al 2010 Environ. Res. Lett. 5 014017 doi:10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014017
Jonathan Koomey1, Hashem Akbari, Carl Blumstein, Marilyn Brown, Richard Brown, Chris Calwell, Sheryl Carter, Ralph Cavanagh, Audrey Chang, David Claridge, Paul Craig, Rick Diamond, Joseph H Eto, William Fulkerson, Ashok Gadgil, Howard Geller, José Goldemberg, Chuck Goldman, David B Goldstein, Steve Greenberg, David Hafemeister, Jeff Harris, Hal Harvey, Eric Heitz, Eric Hirst, Holmes Hummel, Dan Kammen, Henry Kelly, Skip Laitner, Mark Levine, Amory Lovins, Gil Masters, James E McMahon, Alan Meier, Michael Messenger, John Millhone, Evan Mills, Steve Nadel, Bruce Nordman, Lynn Price, Joe Romm, Marc Ross, Michael Rufo, Jayant Sathaye, Lee Schipper, Stephen H Schneider, James L Sweeney, Malcolm Verdict, Diana Vorsatz, Devra Wang, Carl Weinberg, Richard Wilk, John Wilson and Ernst Worrell
Show affiliationsThe growing investment by governments and electric utilities in energy efficiency programs highlights the need for simple tools to help assess and explain the size of the potential resource. One technique that is commonly used in this effort is to characterize electricity savings in terms of avoided power plants, because it is easier for people to visualize a power plant than it is to understand an abstraction such as billions of kilowatt-hours. Unfortunately, there is no standardization around the characteristics of such power plants.
In this letter we define parameters for a standard avoided power plant that have physical meaning and intuitive plausibility, for use in back-of-the-envelope calculations. For the prototypical plant this article settles on a 500 MW existing coal plant operating at a 70% capacity factor with 7% T&D losses. Displacing such a plant for one year would save 3 billion kWh/year at the meter and reduce emissions by 3 million metric tons of CO2 per year.
The proposed name for this metric is the Rosenfeld, in keeping with the tradition among scientists of naming units in honor of the person most responsible for the discovery and widespread adoption of the underlying scientific principle in question—Dr Arthur H Rosenfeld.
Issue 1 (January-March 2010)
Received 30 March 2009, accepted for publication 8 June 2009
Published 9 March 2010
A Corrigendum for this article has been published in 2010 Environ. Res. Lett. 5 039801
Jonathan Koomey et al 2010 Environ. Res. Lett. 5 014017
T Müller et al 2008 New J. Phys. 10 073006
Lea F Santos and Lorenza Viola 2008 New J. Phys. 10 083009
J Silva Lobo and R S Ward 2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 482001
Alexander Stotland et al 2008 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 262001
Aldo M. Serenelli et al 2009 ApJ 705 L123
B. Abbott et al 2009 ApJ 706 L203
M Kurka et al 2009 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42 141002
M. Siarkowski et al 2009 ApJ 705 L143
P Maddaloni et al 2009 Meas. Sci. Technol. 20 052001