Quick search Find article
Quick search
Find article

Defining a standard metric for electricity savings

Jonathan Koomey1, Hashem Akbari, Carl Blumstein, Marilyn Brown, Richard Brown, Chris Calwell, Sheryl Carter, Ralph Cavanagh, Audrey Chang, David Claridge, Paul Craig, Rick Diamond, Joseph H Eto, William Fulkerson, Ashok Gadgil, Howard Geller, José Goldemberg, Chuck Goldman, David B Goldstein, Steve Greenberg, David Hafemeister, Jeff Harris, Hal Harvey, Eric Heitz, Eric Hirst, Holmes Hummel, Dan Kammen, Henry Kelly, Skip Laitner, Mark Levine, Amory Lovins, Gil Masters, James E McMahon, Alan Meier, Michael Messenger, John Millhone, Evan Mills, Steve Nadel, Bruce Nordman, Lynn Price, Joe Romm, Marc Ross, Michael Rufo, Jayant Sathaye, Lee Schipper, Stephen H Schneider, James L Sweeney, Malcolm Verdict, Diana Vorsatz, Devra Wang, Carl Weinberg, Richard Wilk, John Wilson and Ernst Worrell

Show affiliations


The growing investment by governments and electric utilities in energy efficiency programs highlights the need for simple tools to help assess and explain the size of the potential resource. One technique that is commonly used in this effort is to characterize electricity savings in terms of avoided power plants, because it is easier for people to visualize a power plant than it is to understand an abstraction such as billions of kilowatt-hours. Unfortunately, there is no standardization around the characteristics of such power plants.

In this letter we define parameters for a standard avoided power plant that have physical meaning and intuitive plausibility, for use in back-of-the-envelope calculations. For the prototypical plant this article settles on a 500 MW existing coal plant operating at a 70% capacity factor with 7% T&D losses. Displacing such a plant for one year would save 3 billion  kWh/year at the meter and reduce emissions by 3 million metric tons of CO2 per year.

The proposed name for this metric is the Rosenfeld, in keeping with the tradition among scientists of naming units in honor of the person most responsible for the discovery and widespread adoption of the underlying scientific principle in question—Dr Arthur H Rosenfeld.


PACS

89.60.-k Environmental studies

84.70.+p High-current and high-voltage technology: power systems; power transmission lines and cables

Subjects

Electronics and devices

Environmental and Earth science

Dates

Issue 1 (January-March 2010)

Received 30 March 2009, accepted for publication 8 June 2009

Published 9 March 2010


A Corrigendum for this article has been published in 2010 Environ. Res. Lett. 5 039801


  1. Defining a standard metric for electricity savings

    Jonathan Koomey et al 2010 Environ. Res. Lett. 5 014017

  2. Towards a guided atom interferometer based on a superconducting atom chip

    T Müller et al 2008 New J. Phys. 10 073006

  3. Advantages of randomization in coherent quantum dynamical control

    Lea F Santos and Lorenza Viola 2008 New J. Phys. 10 083009

  4. Skyrmion multi-walls

    J Silva Lobo and R S Ward 2009 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 482001

  5. The mesoscopic conductance of disordered rings, its random matrix theory and the generalized variable range hopping picture

    Alexander Stotland et al 2008 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 262001

  6. New Solar Composition: The Problem with Solar Models Revisited

    Aldo M. Serenelli et al 2009 ApJ 705 L123

  7. ERRATUM: "Beating the Spin-Down Limit on Gravitational Wave Emission from the Crab Pulsar" (2008, ApJ, 683, L45)

    B. Abbott et al 2009 ApJ 706 L203

  8. Two-photon double ionization of Ne by free-electron laser radiation: a kinematically complete experiment

    M Kurka et al 2009 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42 141002

  9. Plasma Heating in the Very Early Phase of Solar Flares

    M. Siarkowski et al 2009 ApJ 705 L143

  10. Optical comb generators for laser frequency measurement

    P Maddaloni et al 2009 Meas. Sci. Technol. 20 052001

Related review articles

What's this?
View review articles related to this research to gain an insight into the key trends in this subject area. Related review articles are selected based on PACS/MSC codes, and are no more than three years old.

  1. Radioactive waste policy and legislation: 50 years on from the 1960 Act

View by subject




Export






Please login to access our web services, or create an account if you don't yet have one.

You must have cookies enabled in your web browser to be able to login.

Username
Password

Forgotten your password? Get a new one here.