Steve Plater 2009 Environ. Res. Lett. 4 044004 doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/4/044004
Steve Plater
Show affiliationsThe UK government has announced the introduction from April 2010 of a feed-in tariff (FIT) for renewable energy, and initiated a consultation on its design. This paper compares three possible variants of a UK FIT for rooftop photovoltaic (PV) arrays, on the basis of calculated income and array cost payback time, and for three locations (north, central and southern England) and various levels of household electricity consumption. This modelling is based on an FIT rate equivalent to Germany's. It concludes that an FIT which paid only for PV electricity surplus to on-site needs, and exported to the grid, would mean a simple payback time too long to make array purchase appealing. Preferable would be either export to the grid of all PV electricity for FIT payment; or a lower FIT rate for electricity used on-site, plus full FIT for any surplus exported. The latter would involve significantly lower costs in feed-in tariff payments. Finally, the effect of the UK government's illustrative FIT rate for consultation is examined for the same locations and annual consumption levels.
Issue 4 (October-December 2009)
Received 4 March 2009, accepted for publication 30 September 2009
Published 16 October 2009
Steve Plater 2009 Environ. Res. Lett. 4 044004
M. W. Auger et al. 2009 ApJ 705 1099
Kaitlin M. Kratter et al. 2010 ApJ 710 1375
Ian Dobbs-Dixon et al. 2010 ApJ 710 1395
A I Shiklomanov and R B Lammers 2009 Environ. Res. Lett. 4 045015
Ethan A.-N. Deneault 2009 ApJ 705 1215
N. L. Tsintsadze and L. N. Tsintsadze 2009 EPL 88 35001
Richard M. Plotkin et al. 2008 The Astronomical Journal 135 2453
Charles-Etienne Bisaillon et al 2008 Phys. Med. Biol. 53 N237
G. V. Dedkov and A. A. Kyasov 2007 EPL 78 44005